Membership Simulator:
Charleston Battery
2
1
Birmingham Legion
Charleston Battery
vs
Birmingham Legion
Lead durations (90 minutes of regular time)
Match result analysis
Charleston Battery after 30 matches
Birmingham Legion after 30 matches
Points Per Game (PPG)
| Home |
2.53 |
|
1.07 |
Away |
| Total |
2.07 |
|
0.90 |
Total |
Team Stats vs League Average
Charleston Battery (AT HOME)
vs league average
Birmingham Legion (AWAY)
vs league average
Charleston Battery (TOTAL)
vs league average
Birmingham Legion (TOTAL)
vs league average
Contextual averages
| Charleston Battery |
AVG |
Birmingham Legion |
| (home matches) |
|
(away matches) |
| Played |
15 |
|
15 |
Played |
|
| Avg Scored |
2.67 |
2.23 |
1.80 |
Avg Conceded |
| Avg Conceded |
0.93 |
1.23 |
1.53 |
Avg Scored |
| Avg Total Goals (GF+GA) |
3.60 |
3.47 |
3.33 |
Avg Total Goals (GF+GA) |
|
| Scoring Rate |
100% |
93% |
87% |
Conceding Rate |
| Conceding Rate |
67% |
73% |
80% |
Scoring Rate |
|
| Clean sheets |
33% |
27% |
20% |
Failed to score |
| Failed to score |
0% |
7% |
13% |
Clean sheets |
|
| Scored in both halves |
67% |
57% |
47% |
Conceded in both halves |
| Conceded in both halves |
13% |
23% |
33% |
Scored in both halves |
|
| Scored first |
73% |
63% |
53% |
Conceded first |
| Conceded first |
27% |
33% |
40% |
Scored first |
|
| Leading at HT |
67% |
57% |
47% |
Losing at HT |
| Losing at HT |
7% |
10% |
13% |
Leading at HT |
|
| AVG minute GF |
47' |
48' |
48' |
AVG minute GA |
| AVG minute GA |
51' |
50' |
48' |
AVG minute GF |
|
| GF+GA > 0.5 |
100% |
97% |
93% |
GF+GA > 0.5 |
| GF+GA > 1.5 |
93% |
87% |
80% |
GF+GA > 1.5 |
| GF+GA > 2.5 |
80% |
70% |
60% |
GF+GA > 2.5 |
| GF+GA > 3.5 |
40% |
40% |
40% |
GF+GA > 3.5 |
| GF+GA > 4.5 |
33% |
30% |
27% |
GF+GA > 4.5 |
| GF+GA > .55 |
13% |
17% |
20% |
GF+GA > .55 |
|
| Both teams scored |
67% |
70% |
73% |
Both teams scored |
|
| GF+GA > 0.5 at HT |
87% |
87% |
87% |
GF+GA > 0.5 at HT |
| GF+GA > 1.5 at HT |
60% |
53% |
47% |
GF+GA > 1.5 at HT |
| GF+GA > 2.5 at HT |
20% |
23% |
27% |
GF+GA > 2.5 at HT |
Comparison with league average
Charleston Battery (15 home matches) vs league average AT HOME
| (home matches) |
Charleston Battery |
League |
| points per game |
2.53
|
|
1.59 |
| % Wins |
80%
|
|
44% |
| % Draws |
13%
|
|
26% |
| % Defeats |
7%
|
|
29% |
| Goals scored per game |
2.67
|
|
1.51 |
| Goals conceded per game |
0.93
|
|
1.19 |
| % Clean sheets |
33%
|
|
31% |
| % Failed To Score |
0%
|
|
23% |
| % Won To Nil |
33%
|
|
23% |
| % Lost To Nil |
0%
|
|
15% |
| % Team scored first |
73%
|
|
51% |
| % Opponent scored first |
27%
|
|
41% |
| Average minute scored first |
27
|
|
31 |
| Average minute conceded first |
26
|
|
32 |
| Lead-defending rate |
75%
|
|
64% |
| Equalizing rate |
83%
|
|
49% |
| % Time leading |
53%
|
|
30% |
| % Time level in goals |
38%
|
|
49% |
| % Time trailing |
9%
|
|
21% |
| PPG when scored first |
2.64
|
|
2.33 |
| PPG when conceded first |
2.25
|
|
0.77 |
| Total goals per game |
3.60
|
|
2.70 |
| % over 1.5 goals |
93%
|
|
73% |
| % over 2.5 goals |
80%
|
|
51% |
| % over 3.5 goals |
40%
|
|
29% |
| % both teams scored |
67%
|
|
54% |
Birmingham Legion (15 away matches) vs league average AWAY
| (away matches) |
Birmingham Legion |
League |
| points per game |
1.07
|
|
1.15 |
| % Wins |
20%
|
|
29% |
| % Draws |
47%
|
|
26% |
| % Defeats |
33%
|
|
44% |
| Goals scored per game |
1.53
|
|
1.19 |
| Goals conceded per game |
1.80
|
|
1.51 |
| % Clean sheets |
13%
|
|
23% |
| % Failed To Score |
20%
|
|
31% |
| % Won To Nil |
7%
|
|
15% |
| % Lost To Nil |
13%
|
|
23% |
| % Team scored first |
40%
|
|
41% |
| % Opponent scored first |
53%
|
|
51% |
| Average minute scored first |
15
|
|
32 |
| Average minute conceded first |
37
|
|
31 |
| Lead-defending rate |
23%
|
|
51% |
| Equalizing rate |
58%
|
|
36% |
| % Time leading |
22%
|
|
21% |
| % Time level in goals |
49%
|
|
49% |
| % Time trailing |
29%
|
|
30% |
| PPG when scored first |
0.83
|
|
1.98 |
| PPG when conceded first |
1.25
|
|
0.50 |
| Total goals per game |
3.33
|
|
2.70 |
| % over 1.5 goals |
80%
|
|
73% |
| % over 2.5 goals |
60%
|
|
51% |
| % over 3.5 goals |
40%
|
|
29% |
| % both teams scored |
73%
|
|
54% |
Goal times
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (Total) |
| 0-15 |
GF |
11 |
|
|
| GA |
5 |
|
|
| 16-30 |
GF |
10 |
|
|
| GA |
3 |
|
|
| 31-45 |
GF |
11 |
|
|
| GA |
5 |
|
|
| 46-60 |
GF |
12 |
|
|
| GA |
5 |
|
|
| 61-75 |
GF |
10 |
|
|
| GA |
9 |
|
|
| 76-90 |
GF |
8 |
|
|
| GA |
5 |
|
|
| 1st Half |
GF |
32 |
|
52% |
| GA |
13 |
|
41% |
| 2nd Half |
GF |
30 |
|
48% |
| GA |
19 |
|
59% |
| AVERAGE MINUTES (Total) |
| Avg. minute goals scored |
44 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded |
49 |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (Total) |
| 0-15 |
GF |
7 |
|
|
| GA |
4 |
|
|
| 16-30 |
GF |
6 |
|
|
| GA |
12 |
|
|
| 31-45 |
GF |
3 |
|
|
| GA |
12 |
|
|
| 46-60 |
GF |
4 |
|
|
| GA |
8 |
|
|
| 61-75 |
GF |
7 |
|
|
| GA |
6 |
|
|
| 76-90 |
GF |
9 |
|
|
| GA |
8 |
|
|
| 1st Half |
GF |
16 |
|
44% |
| GA |
28 |
|
56% |
| 2nd Half |
GF |
20 |
|
56% |
| GA |
22 |
|
44% |
| AVERAGE MINUTES (Total) |
| Avg. minute goals scored |
50 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded |
47 |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (Home) |
| 0-15 |
GF |
5 |
|
|
| GA |
2 |
|
|
| 16-30 |
GF |
8 |
|
|
| GA |
0 |
|
|
| 31-45 |
GF |
7 |
|
|
| GA |
3 |
|
|
| 46-60 |
GF |
6 |
|
|
| GA |
3 |
|
|
| 61-75 |
GF |
8 |
|
|
| GA |
5 |
|
|
| 76-90 |
GF |
6 |
|
|
| GA |
1 |
|
|
| 1st Half |
GF |
20 |
|
50% |
| GA |
5 |
|
36% |
| 2nd Half |
GF |
20 |
|
50% |
| GA |
9 |
|
64% |
| AVERAGE MINUTES (Home) |
| Avg. minute goals scored |
47 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded |
51 |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (Away) |
| 0-15 |
GF |
4 |
|
|
| GA |
0 |
|
|
| 16-30 |
GF |
4 |
|
|
| GA |
7 |
|
|
| 31-45 |
GF |
2 |
|
|
| GA |
9 |
|
|
| 46-60 |
GF |
4 |
|
|
| GA |
5 |
|
|
| 61-75 |
GF |
5 |
|
|
| GA |
3 |
|
|
| 76-90 |
GF |
4 |
|
|
| GA |
3 |
|
|
| 1st Half |
GF |
10 |
|
43% |
| GA |
16 |
|
59% |
| 2nd Half |
GF |
13 |
|
57% |
| GA |
11 |
|
41% |
| AVERAGE MINUTES (Away) |
| Avg. minute goals scored |
48 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded |
48 |
Goal Differences by time segment
Goal Differences by time segment (TOTAL)
Charleston Battery Goal Difference (TOTAL)
Birmingham Legion Goal Difference (TOTAL)
Goal Differences by time segment (HOME vs AWAY)
Charleston Battery Goal Difference (AT HOME)
Birmingham Legion Goal Difference (AWAY)
Leading and Trailing
| OPENING GOALS (Home) |
Matches |
| Team scored first |
11 / 15
|
|
73% |
| No goal scored |
0 / 15
|
|
0% |
| Opponent scored first |
4 / 15
|
|
27% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (Home) |
Matches |
| Team was leading at HT |
10 / 15
|
|
67% |
| Team and Opponent level at HT |
4 / 15
|
|
27% |
| Opponent was leading at HT |
1 / 15
|
|
7% |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (Home) |
per match |
| Average minutes leading |
47.7 min. |
|
53% |
| Average minutes level in goals |
34.5 min. |
|
38% |
| Average minutes trailing |
7.8 min. |
|
9% |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (Home) |
| Goals giving the lead |
16 |
| Equalizer goals conceded |
4 |
| Lead-defending rate |
|
|
75% |
| EQUALIZING (Home) |
| Goals giving lead to opponent |
6 |
| Equalizer goals scored |
5 |
| Equalizing rate |
|
|
83% |
| OPENING GOALS (Away) |
Matches |
| Team scored first |
6 / 15
|
|
40% |
| No goal scored |
1 / 15
|
|
7% |
| Opponent scored first |
8 / 15
|
|
53% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (Away) |
Matches |
| Team was leading at HT |
2 / 15
|
|
13% |
| Team and Opponent level at HT |
6 / 15
|
|
40% |
| Opponent was leading at HT |
7 / 15
|
|
47% |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (Away) |
per match |
| Average minutes leading |
19.6 min. |
|
22% |
| Average minutes level in goals |
44.4 min. |
|
49% |
| Average minutes trailing |
26.0 min. |
|
29% |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (Away) |
| Goals giving the lead |
13 |
| Equalizer goals conceded |
10 |
| Lead-defending rate |
|
|
23% |
| EQUALIZING (Away) |
| Goals giving lead to opponent |
12 |
| Equalizer goals scored |
7 |
| Equalizing rate |
|
|
58% |
Results table
Charleston Battery
Birmingham Legion
| Home |
Away |
Opponent |
Home |
Away |
| 1:2 |
4:1 |
Louisville City
|
1:1 |
4:2 |
|
Charleston Battery
|
0:0 |
2:1 |
|
|
Tulsa Roughnecks
|
|
1:1 |
|
1:0 |
Sacramento Republic
|
1:0 |
|
|
1:2 |
New Mexico United
|
|
|
| 1:0 |
2:1 |
North Carolina
|
1:1 |
2:3 |
| 4:2 |
1:2 |
Hartford Athletic
|
1:4 |
1:0 |
| 2:1 |
1:2 |
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
|
1:1 |
2:0 |
| 4:1 |
1:1 |
Loudoun United
|
1:3 |
0:1 |
|
0:2 |
El Paso Locomotive
|
3:1 |
|
| 4:0 |
|
San Antonio
|
|
0:0 |
| 4:1 |
|
Phoenix Rising
|
|
3:3 |
|
2:2 |
Orange County
|
|
4:4 |
| 2:0 |
1:0 |
Rhode Island
|
0:1 |
1:1 |
| 1:1 |
1:3 |
Detroit City
|
1:1 |
2:2 |
| 5:0 |
|
Colorado Springs
|
0:1 |
|
|
|
Lexington
|
|
|
| 2:1 |
1:3 |
Indy Eleven
|
0:1 |
2:1 |
| 2:1 |
1:3 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies
|
1:4 |
2:2 |
| 3:3 |
|
Oakland Roots
|
0:1 |
|
| 3:0 |
1:0 |
Miami FC
|
2:3 |
1:2 |
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
|
|
| 2:1 |
0:0 |
Birmingham Legion
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas Lights
|
|
|
Goal statistics
Charleston Battery
Birmingham Legion
| Home |
Total |
|
Total |
Away |
| 40 |
62 |
Scored (GF) |
36 |
23 |
| 2.67 |
2.07 |
Avg GF |
1.20 |
1.53 |
| 14 |
32 |
Conceded (GA) |
50 |
27 |
| 0.93 |
1.07 |
Avg GA |
1.67 |
1.80 |
| 3.60 |
3.13 |
Avg GF+GA |
2.87 |
3.33 |
| 100% |
97% |
GF+GA > 0.5 |
93% |
93% |
| 93% |
83% |
GF+GA > 1.5 |
70% |
80% |
| 80% |
70% |
GF+GA > 2.5 |
47% |
60% |
| 40% |
37% |
GF+GA > 3.5 |
37% |
40% |
| 33% |
20% |
GF+GA > 4.5 |
23% |
27% |
| 13% |
7% |
GF+GA > .55 |
10% |
20% |
| 87% |
73% |
GF+GA > 0.5 at HT |
77% |
87% |
| 60% |
50% |
GF+GA > 1.5 at HT |
40% |
47% |
| 20% |
23% |
GF+GA > 2.5 at HT |
20% |
27% |
Teams scoring vs league average
Home scoring averages (per match)
(A) Charleston Battery scored at home
2.67
(B) Birmingham Legion conceded away
1.80
(A) (B) average
League Avg home scoring
Away scoring averages (per match)
(A) Charleston Battery conceded at home
0.93
(B) Birmingham Legion scored away
1.53
(A) (B) average
League Avg away scoring
Goals scored + conceded per match
(A) Charleston Battery at home
3.60
(B) Birmingham Legion away
3.33
(A) (B) average
stats.league_avg_goals_match
Home scoring rate averages
(A) Charleston Battery scoring rate at home
100%
(B) Birmingham Legion conceding rate away
87%
(A) (B) average
stats.league_home_scoring_rate
Away scoring rate averages
(A) Charleston Battery conceding rate at home
67%
(B) Birmingham Legion scoring rate away
80%
(A) (B) average
stats.league_away_scoring_rate
Over 1.5 goals (scored + conceded)
(A) Charleston Battery over 1.5 at home
93%
(B) Birmingham Legion over 1.5 away
80%
(A) (B) average
League Avg over 1.5
Over 2.5 goals (scored + conceded)
(A) Charleston Battery over 2.5 at home
80%
(B) Birmingham Legion over 2.5 away
60%
(A) (B) average
League Avg over 2.5
Over 3.5 goals (scored + conceded)
(A) Charleston Battery over 3.5 at home
40%
(B) Birmingham Legion over 3.5 away
40%
(A) (B) average
League Avg over 3.5
Both-Teams-Scored (BTS) matches
(A) Charleston Battery BTS matches at home
67%
(B) Birmingham Legion BTS matches away
73%
(A) (B) average
stats.league_avg_bts
Home vs Away Stats
Charleston Battery
Birmingham Legion
(home matches)
(away matches)
Scorelines
Charleston Battery
Birmingham Legion
| HT home |
| 2:0 |
4 |
|
27% |
| 1:0 |
3 |
|
20% |
| 0:0 |
2 |
|
13% |
| 1:1 |
2 |
|
13% |
| 2:1 |
2 |
|
13% |
| 3:0 |
1 |
|
7% |
| 0:1 |
1 |
|
7% |
| HT away |
| 1:0 |
4 |
|
27% |
| 1:1 |
3 |
|
20% |
| 0:0 |
2 |
|
13% |
| 0:1 |
2 |
|
13% |
| 2:1 |
2 |
|
13% |
| 3:1 |
1 |
|
7% |
| 2:2 |
1 |
|
7% |
Home vs Away distribution
Charleston Battery
Birmingham Legion
| Home |
Away |
|
Home |
Away |
| 61% |
39% |
% Points |
41% |
59% |
| 65% |
35% |
stats.pct_scored |
36% |
64% |
| 44% |
56% |
stats.pct_conceded |
46% |
54% |
Scoring rates
Charleston Battery
Birmingham Legion
| Home |
Total |
|
Total |
Away |
| 100% |
87% |
Scoring Rate |
73% |
80% |
| 80% |
67% |
Scoring Rate 1st-H. |
50% |
60% |
| 87% |
70% |
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. |
47% |
53% |
| 67% |
50% |
Scored in both halves |
23% |
33% |
| 67% |
67% |
Both teams scored |
67% |
73% |
| 67% |
77% |
Conceding Rate |
87% |
87% |
| 33% |
30% |
Conceding Rate 1st-H. |
63% |
73% |
| 47% |
53% |
Conceding Rate 2nd-H. |
53% |
60% |
| 13% |
7% |
Conceded in both halves |
30% |
47% |
Scored + Conceded per match
Charleston Battery
Birmingham Legion
| Home |
Total |
|
Total |
Away |
| 0% |
3% |
Total = 0 |
7% |
7% |
| 7% |
13% |
Total = 1 |
23% |
13% |
| 13% |
13% |
Total = 2 |
23% |
20% |
| 40% |
33% |
Total = 3 |
10% |
20% |
| 7% |
17% |
Total = 4 |
13% |
13% |
| 33% |
20% |
Total = 5+ |
23% |
27% |
| 7% |
17% |
Total = 0 or 1 |
30% |
20% |
| 53% |
47% |
Total = 2 or 3 |
33% |
40% |
| 40% |
37% |
Total = 4+ |
37% |
40% |
Goals scored / Goals conceded
Charleston Battery
Birmingham Legion
| Home |
Total |
|
Total |
Away |
| 100% |
87% |
GF over 0.5 |
73% |
80% |
| 80% |
67% |
GF over 1.5 |
30% |
47% |
| 47% |
33% |
GF over 2.5 |
13% |
20% |
| 33% |
17% |
GF over 3.5 |
3% |
7% |
| 7% |
3% |
GF over 4.5 |
0% |
0% |
| 67% |
77% |
GA over 0.5 |
87% |
87% |
| 20% |
20% |
GA over 1.5 |
43% |
60% |
| 7% |
7% |
GA over 2.5 |
23% |
20% |
| 0% |
3% |
GA over 3.5 |
13% |
13% |
| 0% |
0% |
GA over 4.5 |
0% |
0% |
No goal scored / conceded
Charleston Battery
Birmingham Legion
| Home |
Total |
|
Total |
Away |
| 33% |
23% |
Clean sheets |
13% |
13% |
| 33% |
20% |
Won-to-nil |
7% |
7% |
| 0% |
13% |
Failed to score |
27% |
20% |
| 0% |
10% |
Lost-to-nil |
20% |
13% |
Goal margins
Charleston Battery
Birmingham Legion
Trends
Charleston Battery
- Charleston Battery have been undefeated in their last 14 home matches.
- Charleston Battery has a high ranking in the Points table.
- Charleston Battery has a high ranking in the at Home table.
- Charleston Battery is leading the Offence table.
- Charleston Battery has a high ranking in the Offence for the last 8 matches table.
- Charleston Battery is leading the Offence at Home table.
- Charleston Battery's Points Per Game when conceding first is at 1.33, which is 115% better than the league average of 0.62.
- Charleston Battery's average goals scored per match is at 2.07, which is 53% better than the league average of 1.35.
- Charleston Battery's average goals scored in the first 15 minutes is at 0.37, which is 102% better than the league average of 0.18.
- Charleston Battery's clean sheet rate is at 23%, which is 12% worse than the league average of 27%.
Birmingham Legion
- Birmingham Legion's Points Per Game when conceding first is at 0.89, which is 44% better than the league average of 0.62.
- Birmingham Legion's equalizing rate is at 48%, which is 15% better than the league average of 42%.
- Birmingham Legion have lost their last 2 matches.
- 56% of Birmingham Legion's conceded goals occurred in the first half.
- Birmingham Legion has a low ranking in the Points table.
- Birmingham Legion's Points Per Game when scoring first is at 0.90, which is 59% worse than the league average of 2.17.
- Birmingham Legion's lead-defending rate is at 28%, which is 52% worse than the league average of 58%.
- Birmingham Legion's average goals conceded in the first half is at 0.93, which is 49% worse than the league average of 0.63.
- Birmingham Legion have scored 64% of their goals away.
Points
|
GP |
Pts |
|
Louisville City
|
30
|
73
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
30
|
62
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
30
|
57
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
30
|
48
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
30
|
48
|
|
North Carolina
|
30
|
45
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
30
|
44
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
30
|
44
|
|
Loudoun United
|
30
|
42
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
30
|
41
|
|
San Antonio
|
30
|
40
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
30
|
40
|
|
Orange County
|
30
|
39
|
|
Rhode Island
|
30
|
38
|
|
Detroit City
|
30
|
37
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
30
|
37
|
|
Lexington
|
30
|
36
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
30
|
35
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
30
|
34
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
30
|
32
|
|
Miami FC
|
30
|
30
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
30
|
29
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
30
|
27
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
30
|
27
|
Form for the last 8 matches
|
GP |
Pts |
|
Louisville City
|
8
|
22
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
8
|
16
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
8
|
15
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
8
|
15
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
8
|
15
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
8
|
15
|
|
Rhode Island
|
8
|
14
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
8
|
13
|
|
North Carolina
|
8
|
12
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
8
|
11
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
8
|
11
|
|
San Antonio
|
8
|
10
|
|
Miami FC
|
8
|
10
|
|
Orange County
|
8
|
10
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
8
|
9
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
8
|
9
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
8
|
8
|
|
Detroit City
|
8
|
8
|
|
Loudoun United
|
8
|
8
|
|
Lexington
|
8
|
8
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
8
|
7
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
8
|
6
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
8
|
5
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
8
|
4
|
at Home
|
GP |
Pts |
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
39
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
38
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
33
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
29
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
28
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
27
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
25
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
25
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
24
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
24
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
24
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
23
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
23
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
23
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
23
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
22
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
22
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
21
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
20
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
19
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
19
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
15
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
15
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
11
|
Away
|
GP |
Pts |
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
34
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
24
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
24
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
23
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
23
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
23
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
21
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
18
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
18
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
18
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
17
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
17
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
16
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
16
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
15
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
15
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
15
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
14
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
14
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
12
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
11
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
10
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
8
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
7
|
Offence
|
GP |
GF |
|
Charleston Batt
|
30
|
62
|
|
Louisville City
|
30
|
56
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
30
|
50
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
30
|
48
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
30
|
48
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
30
|
47
|
|
Loudoun United
|
30
|
45
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
30
|
45
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
30
|
44
|
|
Orange County
|
30
|
44
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
30
|
44
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
30
|
43
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
30
|
42
|
|
North Carolina
|
30
|
40
|
|
San Antonio
|
30
|
39
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
30
|
36
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
30
|
35
|
|
Detroit City
|
30
|
33
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
30
|
32
|
|
Lexington
|
30
|
31
|
|
Miami FC
|
30
|
29
|
|
Rhode Island
|
30
|
29
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
30
|
27
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
30
|
23
|
Defence
|
GP |
GA |
|
Louisville City
|
30
|
19
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
30
|
27
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
30
|
28
|
|
Rhode Island
|
30
|
29
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
30
|
30
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
30
|
32
|
|
Detroit City
|
30
|
35
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
30
|
36
|
|
San Antonio
|
30
|
38
|
|
North Carolina
|
30
|
39
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
30
|
41
|
|
Lexington
|
30
|
42
|
|
Miami FC
|
30
|
44
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
30
|
45
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
30
|
45
|
|
Orange County
|
30
|
45
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
30
|
47
|
|
Loudoun United
|
30
|
48
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
30
|
48
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
30
|
50
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
30
|
50
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
30
|
50
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
30
|
52
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
30
|
52
|
Offence for the last 8 matches
|
GP |
GF |
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
8
|
19
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
8
|
17
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
8
|
17
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
8
|
16
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
8
|
14
|
|
Rhode Island
|
8
|
13
|
|
San Antonio
|
8
|
13
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
8
|
13
|
|
Louisville City
|
8
|
11
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
8
|
11
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
8
|
11
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
8
|
10
|
|
Loudoun United
|
8
|
10
|
|
Orange County
|
8
|
10
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
8
|
10
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
8
|
9
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
8
|
8
|
|
Detroit City
|
8
|
8
|
|
Lexington
|
8
|
8
|
|
Miami FC
|
8
|
7
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
8
|
6
|
|
North Carolina
|
8
|
6
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
8
|
5
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
8
|
4
|
Defence for the last 8 matches
|
GP |
GA |
|
Louisville City
|
8
|
1
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
8
|
5
|
|
Rhode Island
|
8
|
6
|
|
Miami FC
|
8
|
7
|
|
North Carolina
|
8
|
7
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
8
|
7
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
8
|
8
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
8
|
9
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
8
|
9
|
|
Detroit City
|
8
|
10
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
8
|
10
|
|
San Antonio
|
8
|
10
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
8
|
11
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
8
|
11
|
|
Orange County
|
8
|
11
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
8
|
12
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
8
|
13
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
8
|
13
|
|
Lexington
|
8
|
14
|
|
Loudoun United
|
8
|
14
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
8
|
16
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
8
|
16
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
8
|
17
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
8
|
18
|
Offence at Home
|
GP |
GF |
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
40
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
31
|
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
30
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
30
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
29
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
27
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
27
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
26
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
26
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
26
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
24
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
23
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
23
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
21
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
20
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
19
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
18
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
18
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
16
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
15
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
15
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
14
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
13
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
13
|
Defence at Home
|
GP |
GA |
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
8
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
9
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
12
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
12
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
13
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
14
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
14
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
14
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
14
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
16
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
17
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
17
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
19
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
19
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
20
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
21
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
22
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
23
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
23
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
23
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
23
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
23
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
26
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
26
|
Offence Away
|
GP |
GF |
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
29
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
27
|
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
26
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
23
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
22
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
21
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
21
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
21
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
20
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
19
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
19
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
17
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
17
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
16
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
16
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
16
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
15
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
14
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
14
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
14
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
13
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
11
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
9
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
8
|
Defence Away
|
GP |
GA |
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
11
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
14
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
16
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
16
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
18
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
20
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
20
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
21
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
21
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
22
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
22
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
22
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
22
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
23
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
24
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
24
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
25
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
25
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
26
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
26
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
27
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
33
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
33
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
33
|
Season summary
360 matches played / 360100.0%
Total goals: 972
Goals per match: 2.70
First Goal Impact & Lead Retention
Home team scored first:51.4%
Away team scored first:41.4%
Avg minute home team scored first: 30.7 min.
Avg minute away team scored first: 31.5 min.
Points Per Game after scoring first: 2.17
Points Per Game after conceding first: 0.62
Lead-defending rate at home:63.9%
Lead-defending rate away:51.5%
Equalizing rate at home:48.5%
Equalizing rate away:36.1%
Home team lead duration:29.8%
Teams level in goals:49.1%
Away team lead duration:21.1%