USA - USL Championship
Stats ▼
Other divisions ▼
Team ▼
Birmingham Legion
Charleston Battery
Colorado Springs
Detroit City
El Paso Locomotive
Hartford Athletic
Indy Eleven
Las Vegas Lights
Lexington
Loudoun United
Louisville City
Miami FC
Monterey Bay
New Mexico United
North Carolina
Oakland Roots
Orange County
Phoenix Rising
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
Rhode Island
Sacramento Republic
San Antonio
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Tulsa Roughnecks
San Antonio vs Birmingham Legion
Membership Simulator:
Select another match
▼
North Carolina vs Miami FC [1:0]
El Paso Locomotive vs Rhode Island [2:2]
Detroit City vs Louisville City [0:1]
Indy Eleven vs Tulsa Roughnecks [2:1]
Colorado Springs vs Hartford Athletic [0:2]
San Antonio vs Birmingham Legion [0:0]
Monterey Bay vs Sacramento Republic [1:0]
Orange County vs Charleston Battery [2:2]
Phoenix Rising vs Oakland Roots [3:3]
Loudoun United vs Tampa Bay Rowdies [2:2]
Pittsburgh Riverhoun vs Las Vegas Lights [1:0]
New Mexico United vs Lexington [2:1]
San Antonio
0
0
Birmingham Legion
San Antonio
vs
Birmingham Legion
0
0
Match result analysis
San Antonio after 30 matches
| drew | 7 / 30 |
|
23% |
| did not score | 11 / 30 |
|
37% |
| clean sheet | 8 / 30 |
|
27% |
Birmingham Legion after 30 matches
| drew | 12 / 30 |
|
40% |
| did not score | 8 / 30 |
|
27% |
| clean sheet | 4 / 30 |
|
13% |
?
The tables above feature a summary of match outcomes and events in the context of each team's seasonal stats in the league
Points Per Game (PPG)
| Home | 1.53 |
|
1.07 | Away |
| Total | 1.33 |
|
0.90 | Total |
Team Stats vs League Average
San Antonio (AT HOME)
vs league average
% Failed To Score
20%
23%
% Clean sheets
33%
31%
% Defeats
40%
29%
% Scored first
47%
51%
Birmingham Legion (AWAY)
vs league average
% Failed To Score
20%
31%
Scored per game
1.53
1.19
% Clean sheets
13%
23%
% Wins
20%
29%
San Antonio (TOTAL)
vs league average
Conceded per game
1.27
1.35
% Clean sheets
27%
27%
% Failed To Score
37%
27%
% Scored first
37%
46%
Birmingham Legion (TOTAL)
vs league average
% Wins
17%
37%
% Clean sheets
13%
27%
Contextual averages
| San Antonio | AVG | Birmingham Legion | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (home matches) | (away matches) | |||
| Played | 15 | 15 | Played | |
| Avg Scored | 1.53 | 1.67 | 1.80 | Avg Conceded |
| Avg Conceded | 1.13 | 1.33 | 1.53 | Avg Scored |
| Avg Total Goals (GF+GA) | 2.67 | 3.00 | 3.33 | Avg Total Goals (GF+GA) |
| Scoring Rate | 80% | 83% | 87% | Conceding Rate |
| Conceding Rate | 67% | 73% | 80% | Scoring Rate |
| Clean sheets | 33% | 27% | 20% | Failed to score |
| Failed to score | 20% | 17% | 13% | Clean sheets |
| Scored in both halves | 20% | 33% | 47% | Conceded in both halves |
| Conceded in both halves | 20% | 27% | 33% | Scored in both halves |
| Scored first | 47% | 50% | 53% | Conceded first |
| Conceded first | 47% | 43% | 40% | Scored first |
| Leading at HT | 33% | 40% | 47% | Losing at HT |
| Losing at HT | 20% | 17% | 13% | Leading at HT |
| AVG minute GF | 48' | 48' | 48' | AVG minute GA |
| AVG minute GA | 48' | 48' | 48' | AVG minute GF |
| GF+GA > 0.5 | 93% | 93% | 93% | GF+GA > 0.5 |
| GF+GA > 1.5 | 67% | 73% | 80% | GF+GA > 1.5 |
| GF+GA > 2.5 | 53% | 57% | 60% | GF+GA > 2.5 |
| GF+GA > 3.5 | 27% | 33% | 40% | GF+GA > 3.5 |
| GF+GA > 4.5 | 13% | 20% | 27% | GF+GA > 4.5 |
| GF+GA > .55 | 7% | 13% | 20% | GF+GA > .55 |
| Both teams scored | 53% | 63% | 73% | Both teams scored |
| GF+GA > 0.5 at HT | 67% | 77% | 87% | GF+GA > 0.5 at HT |
| GF+GA > 1.5 at HT | 40% | 43% | 47% | GF+GA > 1.5 at HT |
| GF+GA > 2.5 at HT | 7% | 17% | 27% | GF+GA > 2.5 at HT |
Comparison with league average
San Antonio (15 home matches) vs league average AT HOME
| (home matches) | San Antonio | League |
|---|
| points per game |
1.53
|
|
1.59 |
| % Wins |
47%
|
|
44% |
| % Draws |
13%
|
|
26% |
| % Defeats |
40%
|
|
29% |
| Goals scored per game |
1.53
|
|
1.51 |
| Goals conceded per game |
1.13
|
|
1.19 |
| % Clean sheets |
33%
|
|
31% |
| % Failed To Score |
20%
|
|
23% |
| % Won To Nil |
27%
|
|
23% |
| % Lost To Nil |
13%
|
|
15% |
| % Team scored first |
47%
|
|
51% |
| % Opponent scored first |
47%
|
|
41% |
| Average minute scored first |
41
|
|
31 |
| Average minute conceded first |
32
|
|
32 |
| Lead-defending rate |
78%
|
|
64% |
| Equalizing rate |
40%
|
|
49% |
| % Time leading |
26%
|
|
30% |
| % Time level in goals |
55%
|
|
49% |
| % Time trailing |
19%
|
|
21% |
| PPG when scored first |
2.29
|
|
2.33 |
| PPG when conceded first |
0.86
|
|
0.77 |
| Total goals per game |
2.67
|
|
2.70 |
| % over 1.5 goals |
67%
|
|
73% |
| % over 2.5 goals |
53%
|
|
51% |
| % over 3.5 goals |
27%
|
|
29% |
| % both teams scored |
53%
|
|
54% |
Birmingham Legion (15 away matches) vs league average AWAY
| (away matches) | Birmingham Legion | League |
|---|
| points per game |
1.07
|
|
1.15 |
| % Wins |
20%
|
|
29% |
| % Draws |
47%
|
|
26% |
| % Defeats |
33%
|
|
44% |
| Goals scored per game |
1.53
|
|
1.19 |
| Goals conceded per game |
1.80
|
|
1.51 |
| % Clean sheets |
13%
|
|
23% |
| % Failed To Score |
20%
|
|
31% |
| % Won To Nil |
7%
|
|
15% |
| % Lost To Nil |
13%
|
|
23% |
| % Team scored first |
40%
|
|
41% |
| % Opponent scored first |
53%
|
|
51% |
| Average minute scored first |
15
|
|
32 |
| Average minute conceded first |
37
|
|
31 |
| Lead-defending rate |
23%
|
|
51% |
| Equalizing rate |
58%
|
|
36% |
| % Time leading |
22%
|
|
21% |
| % Time level in goals |
49%
|
|
49% |
| % Time trailing |
29%
|
|
30% |
| PPG when scored first |
0.83
|
|
1.98 |
| PPG when conceded first |
1.25
|
|
0.50 |
| Total goals per game |
3.33
|
|
2.70 |
| % over 1.5 goals |
80%
|
|
73% |
| % over 2.5 goals |
60%
|
|
51% |
| % over 3.5 goals |
40%
|
|
29% |
| % both teams scored |
73%
|
|
54% |
Goal times
San Antonio
Total
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (Total) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-15 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 9 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 16 | 41% | |
| GA | 18 | 47% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 23 | 59% | |
| GA | 20 | 53% |
| AVERAGE MINUTES (Total) | |
|---|---|
| Avg. minute goals scored | 50 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 47 |
Birmingham Legion
Total
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (Total) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-15 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 12 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 12 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 9 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 16 | 44% | |
| GA | 28 | 56% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 20 | 56% | |
| GA | 22 | 44% |
| AVERAGE MINUTES (Total) | |
|---|---|
| Avg. minute goals scored | 50 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 47 |
San Antonio
Home
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (Home) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-15 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 10 | 43% | |
| GA | 8 | 47% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 13 | 57% | |
| GA | 9 | 53% |
| AVERAGE MINUTES (Home) | |
|---|---|
| Avg. minute goals scored | 48 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 48 |
Birmingham Legion
Away
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (Away) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-15 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 10 | 43% | |
| GA | 16 | 59% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 13 | 57% | |
| GA | 11 | 41% |
| AVERAGE MINUTES (Away) | |
|---|---|
| Avg. minute goals scored | 48 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 48 |
Goal Differences by time segment
Goal Differences by time segment (TOTAL)
San Antonio Goal Difference (TOTAL)
Birmingham Legion Goal Difference (TOTAL)
+10
0
-10
-3
+3
-1
-6
+2
-9
+2
-4
-1
+1
+2
+1
0-15
16-30
31-45
46-60
61-75
76-90
Goal Differences by time segment (HOME vs AWAY)
San Antonio Goal Difference (AT HOME)
Birmingham Legion Goal Difference (AWAY)
+8
0
-8
+1
+4
-1
-3
+2
-7
+3
-1
+1
+2
+1
0-15
16-30
31-45
46-60
61-75
76-90
Leading and Trailing
San Antonio
Home
| OPENING GOALS (Home) | Matches | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Team scored first | 7 / 15 | 47% | |
| No goal scored | 1 / 15 | 7% | |
| Opponent scored first | 7 / 15 | 47% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (Home) | Matches | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Team was leading at HT | 5 / 15 | 33% | |
| Team and Opponent level at HT | 7 / 15 | 47% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 3 / 15 | 20% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (Home) | per match | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Average minutes leading | 23.7 min. | 26% | |
| Average minutes level in goals | 49.7 min. | 55% | |
| Average minutes trailing | 16.7 min. | 19% | |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (Home) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals giving the lead | 9 | ||
| Equalizer goals conceded | 2 | ||
| Lead-defending rate | 78% | ||
| EQUALIZING (Home) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals giving lead to opponent | 10 | ||
| Equalizer goals scored | 4 | ||
| Equalizing rate | 40% | ||
Birmingham Legion
Away
| OPENING GOALS (Away) | Matches | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Team scored first | 6 / 15 | 40% | |
| No goal scored | 1 / 15 | 7% | |
| Opponent scored first | 8 / 15 | 53% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (Away) | Matches | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Team was leading at HT | 2 / 15 | 13% | |
| Team and Opponent level at HT | 6 / 15 | 40% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 7 / 15 | 47% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (Away) | per match | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Average minutes leading | 19.6 min. | 22% | |
| Average minutes level in goals | 44.4 min. | 49% | |
| Average minutes trailing | 26.0 min. | 29% | |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (Away) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals giving the lead | 13 | ||
| Equalizer goals conceded | 10 | ||
| Lead-defending rate | 23% | ||
| EQUALIZING (Away) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals giving lead to opponent | 12 | ||
| Equalizer goals scored | 7 | ||
| Equalizing rate | 58% | ||
Results table
San Antonio
Birmingham Legion
| Home | Away | Opponent | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louisville City | 1:1 | 4:2 | ||
| 4:0 | Charleston Battery | 0:0 | 2:1 | |
| 1:1 | 2:0 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 1:1 | |
| 1:3 | 0:0 | Sacramento Republic | 1:0 | |
| 0:1 | 4:2 | New Mexico United | ||
| North Carolina | 1:1 | 2:3 | ||
| Hartford Athletic | 1:4 | 1:0 | ||
| 2:0 | Pittsburgh Riverhoun | 1:1 | 2:0 | |
| 2:5 | Loudoun United | 1:3 | 0:1 | |
| 5:2 | 1:2 | El Paso Locomotive | 3:1 | |
| San Antonio | 0:0 | |||
| 1:2 | 1:0 | Phoenix Rising | 3:3 | |
| 3:1 | 1:0 | Orange County | 4:4 | |
| 0:0 | Rhode Island | 0:1 | 1:1 | |
| 1:1 | Detroit City | 1:1 | 2:2 | |
| 3:2 | 1:0 | Colorado Springs | 0:1 | |
| 0:1 | 2:3 | Lexington | ||
| Indy Eleven | 0:1 | 2:1 | ||
| 1:0 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 1:4 | 2:2 | |
| 1:2 | 1:2 | Oakland Roots | 0:1 | |
| 1:2 | Miami FC | 2:3 | 1:2 | |
| 1:0 | 0:0 | Monterey Bay | ||
| 0:0 | Birmingham Legion | |||
| 3:0 | 1:1 | Las Vegas Lights | ||
Goal statistics
San Antonio
Birmingham Legion
| Home | Total | Total | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | 39 | Scored (GF) | 36 | 23 |
| 1.53 | 1.30 | Avg GF | 1.20 | 1.53 |
| 17 | 38 | Conceded (GA) | 50 | 27 |
| 1.13 | 1.27 | Avg GA | 1.67 | 1.80 |
| 2.67 | 2.57 | Avg GF+GA | 2.87 | 3.33 |
| 93% | 87% | GF+GA > 0.5 | 93% | 93% |
| 67% | 63% | GF+GA > 1.5 | 70% | 80% |
| 53% | 47% | GF+GA > 2.5 | 47% | 60% |
| 27% | 27% | GF+GA > 3.5 | 37% | 40% |
| 13% | 17% | GF+GA > 4.5 | 23% | 27% |
| 7% | 10% | GF+GA > .55 | 10% | 20% |
| 67% | 70% | GF+GA > 0.5 at HT | 77% | 87% |
| 40% | 30% | GF+GA > 1.5 at HT | 40% | 47% |
| 7% | 7% | GF+GA > 2.5 at HT | 20% | 27% |
Teams scoring vs league average
Home scoring averages (per match)
(A) San Antonio scored at home
1.53
(B) Birmingham Legion conceded away
1.80
(A) (B) average
League Avg home scoring
1.67
1.51
Away scoring averages (per match)
(A) San Antonio conceded at home
1.13
(B) Birmingham Legion scored away
1.53
(A) (B) average
League Avg away scoring
1.33
1.19
Goals scored + conceded per match
(A) San Antonio at home
2.67
(B) Birmingham Legion away
3.33
(A) (B) average
stats.league_avg_goals_match
3.00
2.70
Home scoring rate averages
(A) San Antonio scoring rate at home
80%
(B) Birmingham Legion conceding rate away
87%
(A) (B) average
stats.league_home_scoring_rate
83%
78%
Away scoring rate averages
(A) San Antonio conceding rate at home
67%
(B) Birmingham Legion scoring rate away
80%
(A) (B) average
stats.league_away_scoring_rate
73%
69%
Over 1.5 goals (scored + conceded)
(A) San Antonio over 1.5 at home
67%
(B) Birmingham Legion over 1.5 away
80%
(A) (B) average
League Avg over 1.5
73%
73%
Over 2.5 goals (scored + conceded)
(A) San Antonio over 2.5 at home
53%
(B) Birmingham Legion over 2.5 away
60%
(A) (B) average
League Avg over 2.5
57%
51%
Over 3.5 goals (scored + conceded)
(A) San Antonio over 3.5 at home
27%
(B) Birmingham Legion over 3.5 away
40%
(A) (B) average
League Avg over 3.5
33%
29%
Both-Teams-Scored (BTS) matches
(A) San Antonio BTS matches at home
53%
(B) Birmingham Legion BTS matches away
73%
(A) (B) average
stats.league_avg_bts
63%
54%
Home vs Away Stats
San Antonio
Birmingham Legion
(home matches)
(away matches)
15
Played
15
Goals For per match
1.53
1.53
Clean sheets
33%
13%
Won-to-nil
27%
7%
Scoring Rate
80%
80%
Scored in both halves
20%
33%
Scored first
47%
40%
Leading at HT
33%
13%
Goals Against per match
1.13
1.80
Failed to score
20%
20%
Lost-to-nil
13%
13%
Conceding Rate
67%
87%
Conceded in both halves
20%
47%
Conceded first
47%
53%
Losing at HT
20%
47%
Scorelines
San Antonio
Birmingham Legion
Home vs Away distribution
San Antonio
Birmingham Legion
| Home | Away | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57% | 43% | % Points | 41% | 59% |
| 59% | 41% | stats.pct_scored | 36% | 64% |
| 45% | 55% | stats.pct_conceded | 46% | 54% |
Scoring rates
San Antonio
Birmingham Legion
| Home | Total | Total | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80% | 63% | Scoring Rate | 73% | 80% |
| 47% | 40% | Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 50% | 60% |
| 53% | 43% | Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 47% | 53% |
| 20% | 20% | Scored in both halves | 23% | 33% |
| 53% | 50% | Both teams scored | 67% | 73% |
| 67% | 73% | Conceding Rate | 87% | 87% |
| 40% | 47% | Conceding Rate 1st-H. | 63% | 73% |
| 47% | 50% | Conceding Rate 2nd-H. | 53% | 60% |
| 20% | 23% | Conceded in both halves | 30% | 47% |
Scored + Conceded per match
San Antonio
Birmingham Legion
| Home | Total | Total | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7% | 13% | Total = 0 | 7% | 7% |
| 27% | 23% | Total = 1 | 23% | 13% |
| 13% | 17% | Total = 2 | 23% | 20% |
| 27% | 20% | Total = 3 | 10% | 20% |
| 13% | 10% | Total = 4 | 13% | 13% |
| 13% | 17% | Total = 5+ | 23% | 27% |
| 33% | 37% | Total = 0 or 1 | 30% | 20% |
| 40% | 37% | Total = 2 or 3 | 33% | 40% |
| 27% | 27% | Total = 4+ | 37% | 40% |
Goals scored / Goals conceded
San Antonio
Birmingham Legion
| Home | Total | Total | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80% | 63% | GF over 0.5 | 73% | 80% |
| 33% | 33% | GF over 1.5 | 30% | 47% |
| 27% | 20% | GF over 2.5 | 13% | 20% |
| 7% | 7% | GF over 3.5 | 3% | 7% |
| 7% | 7% | GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% |
| 67% | 73% | GA over 0.5 | 87% | 87% |
| 40% | 37% | GA over 1.5 | 43% | 60% |
| 7% | 10% | GA over 2.5 | 23% | 20% |
| 0% | 7% | GA over 3.5 | 13% | 13% |
| 0% | 0% | GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% |
No goal scored / conceded
San Antonio
Birmingham Legion
| Home | Total | Total | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33% | 27% | Clean sheets | 13% | 13% |
| 27% | 13% | Won-to-nil | 7% | 7% |
| 20% | 37% | Failed to score | 27% | 20% |
| 13% | 23% | Lost-to-nil | 20% | 13% |
Goal margins
San Antonio
Birmingham Legion
Margins (at home)
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| L | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Margins (away)
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| L | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Margins (total)
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| L | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
Margins (total)
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| L | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
Trends
San Antonio
- San Antonio's Points Per Game when conceding first is at 0.80, which is 29% better than the league average of 0.62.
- San Antonio's average goals conceded per match is at 1.27, which is 6% better than the league average of 1.35.
- San Antonio have conceded the opening goal in 47% of their 15 home matches.
- San Antonio's team-scored-first rate is at 37%, which is 21% worse than the league average of 46%.
- San Antonio's team-conceded-first rate is at 50%, which is 8% worse than the league average of 46%.
- San Antonio's average goals conceded in the first 15 minutes is at 0.27, which is 47% worse than the league average of 0.18.
Birmingham Legion
- Birmingham Legion's Points Per Game when conceding first is at 0.89, which is 44% better than the league average of 0.62.
- Birmingham Legion's equalizing rate is at 48%, which is 15% better than the league average of 42%.
- Birmingham Legion have lost their last 2 matches.
- 56% of Birmingham Legion's conceded goals occurred in the first half.
- Birmingham Legion has a low ranking in the Points table.
- Birmingham Legion's Points Per Game when scoring first is at 0.90, which is 59% worse than the league average of 2.17.
- Birmingham Legion's lead-defending rate is at 28%, which is 52% worse than the league average of 58%.
- Birmingham Legion's average goals conceded in the first half is at 0.93, which is 49% worse than the league average of 0.63.
- Birmingham Legion have scored 64% of their goals away.
Points
| GP | Pts | |
|---|---|---|
| Louisville City | 30 | 73 |
| Charleston Batt | 30 | 62 |
| Tulsa Roughneck | 30 | 57 |
| Sacramento Repu | 30 | 48 |
| New Mexico Unit | 30 | 48 |
| North Carolina | 30 | 45 |
| Hartford Athlet | 30 | 44 |
| Pittsburgh Rive | 30 | 44 |
| Loudoun United | 30 | 42 |
| El Paso Locomot | 30 | 41 |
| San Antonio | 30 | 40 |
| Phoenix Rising | 30 | 40 |
| Orange County | 30 | 39 |
| Rhode Island | 30 | 38 |
| Detroit City | 30 | 37 |
| Colorado Spring | 30 | 37 |
| Lexington | 30 | 36 |
| Indy Eleven | 30 | 35 |
| Tampa Bay Rowdi | 30 | 34 |
| Oakland Roots | 30 | 32 |
| Miami FC | 30 | 30 |
| Monterey Bay | 30 | 29 |
| Birmingham Legi | 30 | 27 |
| Las Vegas Light | 30 | 27 |
Form for the last 8 matches
| GP | Pts | |
|---|---|---|
| Louisville City | 8 | 22 |
| Pittsburgh Rive | 8 | 16 |
| Charleston Batt | 8 | 15 |
| Tulsa Roughneck | 8 | 15 |
| Hartford Athlet | 8 | 15 |
| New Mexico Unit | 8 | 15 |
| Rhode Island | 8 | 14 |
| Tampa Bay Rowdi | 8 | 13 |
| North Carolina | 8 | 12 |
| Phoenix Rising | 8 | 11 |
| Sacramento Repu | 8 | 11 |
| San Antonio | 8 | 10 |
| Miami FC | 8 | 10 |
| Orange County | 8 | 10 |
| El Paso Locomot | 8 | 9 |
| Indy Eleven | 8 | 9 |
| Oakland Roots | 8 | 8 |
| Detroit City | 8 | 8 |
| Loudoun United | 8 | 8 |
| Lexington | 8 | 8 |
| Colorado Spring | 8 | 7 |
| Birmingham Legi | 8 | 6 |
| Monterey Bay | 8 | 5 |
| Las Vegas Light | 8 | 4 |
at Home
| GP | Pts | |
|---|---|---|
| Louisville City | 15 | 39 |
| Charleston Batt | 15 | 38 |
| Tulsa Roughneck | 15 | 33 |
| Orange County | 15 | 29 |
| Pittsburgh Rive | 15 | 28 |
| North Carolina | 15 | 27 |
| Sacramento Repu | 15 | 25 |
| New Mexico Unit | 15 | 25 |
| Lexington | 15 | 24 |
| Loudoun United | 15 | 24 |
| Indy Eleven | 15 | 24 |
| El Paso Locomot | 15 | 23 |
| San Antonio | 15 | 23 |
| Rhode Island | 15 | 23 |
| Colorado Spring | 15 | 23 |
| Detroit City | 15 | 22 |
| Monterey Bay | 15 | 22 |
| Hartford Athlet | 15 | 21 |
| Tampa Bay Rowdi | 15 | 20 |
| Phoenix Rising | 15 | 19 |
| Las Vegas Light | 15 | 19 |
| Miami FC | 15 | 15 |
| Oakland Roots | 15 | 15 |
| Birmingham Legi | 15 | 11 |
Away
| GP | Pts | |
|---|---|---|
| Louisville City | 15 | 34 |
| Tulsa Roughneck | 15 | 24 |
| Charleston Batt | 15 | 24 |
| Sacramento Repu | 15 | 23 |
| Hartford Athlet | 15 | 23 |
| New Mexico Unit | 15 | 23 |
| Phoenix Rising | 15 | 21 |
| North Carolina | 15 | 18 |
| Loudoun United | 15 | 18 |
| El Paso Locomot | 15 | 18 |
| Oakland Roots | 15 | 17 |
| San Antonio | 15 | 17 |
| Pittsburgh Rive | 15 | 16 |
| Birmingham Legi | 15 | 16 |
| Rhode Island | 15 | 15 |
| Detroit City | 15 | 15 |
| Miami FC | 15 | 15 |
| Tampa Bay Rowdi | 15 | 14 |
| Colorado Spring | 15 | 14 |
| Lexington | 15 | 12 |
| Indy Eleven | 15 | 11 |
| Orange County | 15 | 10 |
| Las Vegas Light | 15 | 8 |
| Monterey Bay | 15 | 7 |
Offence
| GP | GF | |
|---|---|---|
| Charleston Batt | 30 | 62 |
| Louisville City | 30 | 56 |
| Tulsa Roughneck | 30 | 50 |
| Hartford Athlet | 30 | 48 |
| Phoenix Rising | 30 | 48 |
| El Paso Locomot | 30 | 47 |
| Loudoun United | 30 | 45 |
| New Mexico Unit | 30 | 45 |
| Indy Eleven | 30 | 44 |
| Orange County | 30 | 44 |
| Sacramento Repu | 30 | 44 |
| Tampa Bay Rowdi | 30 | 43 |
| Oakland Roots | 30 | 42 |
| North Carolina | 30 | 40 |
| San Antonio | 30 | 39 |
| Birmingham Legi | 30 | 36 |
| Colorado Spring | 30 | 35 |
| Detroit City | 30 | 33 |
| Pittsburgh Rive | 30 | 32 |
| Lexington | 30 | 31 |
| Miami FC | 30 | 29 |
| Rhode Island | 30 | 29 |
| Monterey Bay | 30 | 27 |
| Las Vegas Light | 30 | 23 |
Defence
| GP | GA | |
|---|---|---|
| Louisville City | 30 | 19 |
| Sacramento Repu | 30 | 27 |
| Pittsburgh Rive | 30 | 28 |
| Rhode Island | 30 | 29 |
| Tulsa Roughneck | 30 | 30 |
| Charleston Batt | 30 | 32 |
| Detroit City | 30 | 35 |
| Hartford Athlet | 30 | 36 |
| San Antonio | 30 | 38 |
| North Carolina | 30 | 39 |
| New Mexico Unit | 30 | 41 |
| Lexington | 30 | 42 |
| Miami FC | 30 | 44 |
| El Paso Locomot | 30 | 45 |
| Monterey Bay | 30 | 45 |
| Orange County | 30 | 45 |
| Colorado Spring | 30 | 47 |
| Loudoun United | 30 | 48 |
| Phoenix Rising | 30 | 48 |
| Birmingham Legi | 30 | 50 |
| Las Vegas Light | 30 | 50 |
| Tampa Bay Rowdi | 30 | 50 |
| Indy Eleven | 30 | 52 |
| Oakland Roots | 30 | 52 |
Offence for the last 8 matches
| GP | GF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tampa Bay Rowdi | 8 | 19 |
| Charleston Batt | 8 | 17 |
| Oakland Roots | 8 | 17 |
| Hartford Athlet | 8 | 16 |
| New Mexico Unit | 8 | 14 |
| Rhode Island | 8 | 13 |
| San Antonio | 8 | 13 |
| Tulsa Roughneck | 8 | 13 |
| Louisville City | 8 | 11 |
| Pittsburgh Rive | 8 | 11 |
| Sacramento Repu | 8 | 11 |
| El Paso Locomot | 8 | 10 |
| Loudoun United | 8 | 10 |
| Orange County | 8 | 10 |
| Phoenix Rising | 8 | 10 |
| Indy Eleven | 8 | 9 |
| Birmingham Legi | 8 | 8 |
| Detroit City | 8 | 8 |
| Lexington | 8 | 8 |
| Miami FC | 8 | 7 |
| Colorado Spring | 8 | 6 |
| North Carolina | 8 | 6 |
| Las Vegas Light | 8 | 5 |
| Monterey Bay | 8 | 4 |
Defence for the last 8 matches
| GP | GA | |
|---|---|---|
| Louisville City | 8 | 1 |
| Tulsa Roughneck | 8 | 5 |
| Rhode Island | 8 | 6 |
| Miami FC | 8 | 7 |
| North Carolina | 8 | 7 |
| Pittsburgh Rive | 8 | 7 |
| Phoenix Rising | 8 | 8 |
| Charleston Batt | 8 | 9 |
| Hartford Athlet | 8 | 9 |
| Detroit City | 8 | 10 |
| Sacramento Repu | 8 | 10 |
| San Antonio | 8 | 10 |
| Las Vegas Light | 8 | 11 |
| New Mexico Unit | 8 | 11 |
| Orange County | 8 | 11 |
| Indy Eleven | 8 | 12 |
| Birmingham Legi | 8 | 13 |
| El Paso Locomot | 8 | 13 |
| Lexington | 8 | 14 |
| Loudoun United | 8 | 14 |
| Monterey Bay | 8 | 16 |
| Tampa Bay Rowdi | 8 | 16 |
| Colorado Spring | 8 | 17 |
| Oakland Roots | 8 | 18 |
Offence at Home
| GP | GF | |
|---|---|---|
| Charleston Batt | 15 | 40 |
| El Paso Locomot | 15 | 31 |
| Louisville City | 15 | 30 |
| Orange County | 15 | 30 |
| Tulsa Roughneck | 15 | 29 |
| Indy Eleven | 15 | 27 |
| Phoenix Rising | 15 | 27 |
| Loudoun United | 15 | 26 |
| New Mexico Unit | 15 | 26 |
| Tampa Bay Rowdi | 15 | 26 |
| North Carolina | 15 | 24 |
| Sacramento Repu | 15 | 23 |
| San Antonio | 15 | 23 |
| Hartford Athlet | 15 | 21 |
| Lexington | 15 | 20 |
| Monterey Bay | 15 | 19 |
| Detroit City | 15 | 18 |
| Pittsburgh Rive | 15 | 18 |
| Miami FC | 15 | 16 |
| Colorado Spring | 15 | 15 |
| Rhode Island | 15 | 15 |
| Las Vegas Light | 15 | 14 |
| Birmingham Legi | 15 | 13 |
| Oakland Roots | 15 | 13 |
Defence at Home
| GP | GA | |
|---|---|---|
| Louisville City | 15 | 8 |
| Rhode Island | 15 | 9 |
| Detroit City | 15 | 12 |
| Pittsburgh Rive | 15 | 12 |
| Sacramento Repu | 15 | 13 |
| Charleston Batt | 15 | 14 |
| Colorado Spring | 15 | 14 |
| Hartford Athlet | 15 | 14 |
| Tulsa Roughneck | 15 | 14 |
| Lexington | 15 | 16 |
| Las Vegas Light | 15 | 17 |
| San Antonio | 15 | 17 |
| North Carolina | 15 | 19 |
| Oakland Roots | 15 | 19 |
| New Mexico Unit | 15 | 20 |
| Orange County | 15 | 21 |
| Miami FC | 15 | 22 |
| Birmingham Legi | 15 | 23 |
| El Paso Locomot | 15 | 23 |
| Loudoun United | 15 | 23 |
| Monterey Bay | 15 | 23 |
| Phoenix Rising | 15 | 23 |
| Indy Eleven | 15 | 26 |
| Tampa Bay Rowdi | 15 | 26 |
Offence Away
| GP | GF | |
|---|---|---|
| Oakland Roots | 15 | 29 |
| Hartford Athlet | 15 | 27 |
| Louisville City | 15 | 26 |
| Birmingham Legi | 15 | 23 |
| Charleston Batt | 15 | 22 |
| Phoenix Rising | 15 | 21 |
| Sacramento Repu | 15 | 21 |
| Tulsa Roughneck | 15 | 21 |
| Colorado Spring | 15 | 20 |
| Loudoun United | 15 | 19 |
| New Mexico Unit | 15 | 19 |
| Indy Eleven | 15 | 17 |
| Tampa Bay Rowdi | 15 | 17 |
| El Paso Locomot | 15 | 16 |
| North Carolina | 15 | 16 |
| San Antonio | 15 | 16 |
| Detroit City | 15 | 15 |
| Orange County | 15 | 14 |
| Pittsburgh Rive | 15 | 14 |
| Rhode Island | 15 | 14 |
| Miami FC | 15 | 13 |
| Lexington | 15 | 11 |
| Las Vegas Light | 15 | 9 |
| Monterey Bay | 15 | 8 |
Defence Away
| GP | GA | |
|---|---|---|
| Louisville City | 15 | 11 |
| Sacramento Repu | 15 | 14 |
| Pittsburgh Rive | 15 | 16 |
| Tulsa Roughneck | 15 | 16 |
| Charleston Batt | 15 | 18 |
| North Carolina | 15 | 20 |
| Rhode Island | 15 | 20 |
| New Mexico Unit | 15 | 21 |
| San Antonio | 15 | 21 |
| El Paso Locomot | 15 | 22 |
| Hartford Athlet | 15 | 22 |
| Miami FC | 15 | 22 |
| Monterey Bay | 15 | 22 |
| Detroit City | 15 | 23 |
| Orange County | 15 | 24 |
| Tampa Bay Rowdi | 15 | 24 |
| Loudoun United | 15 | 25 |
| Phoenix Rising | 15 | 25 |
| Indy Eleven | 15 | 26 |
| Lexington | 15 | 26 |
| Birmingham Legi | 15 | 27 |
| Colorado Spring | 15 | 33 |
| Las Vegas Light | 15 | 33 |
| Oakland Roots | 15 | 33 |
Season summary
First Goal Impact & Lead Retention
Home team scored first:
51.4%
No goal scored:
7.2%
Away team scored first:
41.4%
Avg minute home team scored first: 30.7 min.
Avg minute away team scored first: 31.5 min.
Points Per Game after scoring first: 2.17
Points Per Game after conceding first: 0.62
Lead-defending rate at home:
63.9%
Lead-defending rate away:
51.5%
Equalizing rate at home:
48.5%
Equalizing rate away:
36.1%
Home team lead duration:
29.8%
Teams level in goals:
49.1%
Away team lead duration:
21.1%