China pr - League One
2026 ▼
Estadísticas ▼
Últimos resultados
Partidos
Tablas de Forma
Goles
Descanso
Tiempos
Estadísticas del Primer Gol
Cuadrícula de Resultados
Tablas Local y Visitante
Tablas por Fecha
Tabla ampliada
Índice de Rendimiento de Puntos
Análisis de la Recta Final
Puntos Proyectados
Goles Totales
Rangos de Goles
Goles Promedio
Marcados vs Encajados
Márgenes de Goles
Duraciones con Ventaja
Rachas Actuales
Empates (Remontadas)
Ligas ▼
China PR - league-one: Goles
Membership Simulator:
Goles Marcados + Encajados
| Teams (Total) ↕ | GP ↕ | Avg ↕ | 0.5+ ↕ | 1.5+ ↕ | 2.5+ ↕ | 3.5+ ↕ | 4.5+ ↕ | 5.5+ ↕ | BTS ↕ | CS ↕ | FTS ↕ | WTN ↕ | LTN ↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foshan Nashi FC | 29 | 3.34 | 97% | 83% | 59% | 45% | 34% | 14% | 59% | 14% | 31% | 10% | 28% |
| Changchun Yatai | 29 | 3.14 | 100% | 86% | 69% | 38% | 14% | 7% | 69% | 17% | 14% | 17% | 14% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 29 | 3.10 | 93% | 83% | 55% | 31% | 21% | 17% | 76% | 14% | 17% | 7% | 10% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 29 | 2.97 | 97% | 79% | 62% | 34% | 17% | 7% | 52% | 14% | 38% | 10% | 34% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 29 | 2.93 | 97% | 86% | 55% | 31% | 14% | 7% | 62% | 31% | 10% | 28% | 7% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 29 | 2.86 | 93% | 79% | 66% | 31% | 14% | 3% | 48% | 34% | 24% | 28% | 17% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 29 | 2.79 | 97% | 69% | 52% | 24% | 17% | 14% | 55% | 31% | 17% | 28% | 14% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 29 | 2.72 | 97% | 79% | 48% | 28% | 14% | 7% | 45% | 31% | 28% | 28% | 24% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 29 | 2.69 | 90% | 76% | 48% | 28% | 14% | 3% | 62% | 17% | 31% | 7% | 21% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 29 | 2.55 | 79% | 62% | 45% | 31% | 17% | 10% | 41% | 45% | 34% | 24% | 14% |
| Yanbian Longding | 29 | 2.48 | 86% | 72% | 48% | 24% | 10% | 3% | 52% | 31% | 31% | 17% | 17% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 29 | 2.41 | 90% | 66% | 45% | 21% | 17% | 3% | 52% | 28% | 31% | 17% | 21% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 29 | 2.41 | 86% | 62% | 45% | 28% | 10% | 7% | 55% | 24% | 34% | 10% | 21% |
| Nanjing City | 29 | 2.34 | 93% | 72% | 38% | 17% | 7% | 3% | 52% | 24% | 31% | 17% | 24% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 29 | 2.00 | 86% | 52% | 28% | 21% | 10% | 3% | 45% | 48% | 21% | 34% | 7% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 29 | 1.93 | 83% | 59% | 38% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 45% | 31% | 41% | 14% | 24% |
| Foshan Nashi FC | 8 | 3.88 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 63% | 63% | 25% | 63% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 13% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 8 | 3.38 | 100% | 88% | 63% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 38% | 25% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 8 | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 88% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 13% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 8 | 3.00 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 50% | 13% | 50% | 0% | 38% |
| Nanjing City | 8 | 2.88 | 88% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 38% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 25% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 8 | 2.50 | 100% | 63% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 63% | 25% | 13% | 25% | 13% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 8 | 2.50 | 88% | 75% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 63% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 13% |
| Yanbian Longding | 8 | 2.50 | 100% | 75% | 50% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| Changchun Yatai | 8 | 2.38 | 100% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 63% | 25% | 13% | 25% | 13% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 8 | 2.38 | 100% | 75% | 50% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 8 | 2.25 | 100% | 75% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 50% | 13% | 38% | 13% | 38% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 8 | 2.25 | 75% | 63% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 63% | 25% | 38% | 0% | 13% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 8 | 2.00 | 88% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 38% | 25% | 50% | 13% | 38% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 8 | 1.88 | 75% | 63% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 13% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 8 | 1.75 | 75% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 38% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 8 | 1.50 | 100% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 63% | 25% | 63% | 25% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 3.40 | 100% | 93% | 80% | 40% | 20% | 7% | 60% | 7% | 33% | 7% | 33% |
| Changchun Yatai | 15 | 3.13 | 100% | 80% | 67% | 33% | 20% | 13% | 60% | 33% | 7% | 33% | 7% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 15 | 3.07 | 93% | 67% | 60% | 33% | 20% | 20% | 60% | 33% | 13% | 27% | 7% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 14 | 3.00 | 86% | 79% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 7% | 71% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 0% |
| Foshan Nashi FC | 15 | 3.00 | 93% | 80% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 7% | 60% | 13% | 33% | 7% | 27% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 14 | 2.93 | 93% | 79% | 71% | 36% | 7% | 7% | 50% | 43% | 14% | 36% | 7% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 15 | 2.87 | 87% | 80% | 53% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 80% | 13% | 20% | 0% | 7% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 14 | 2.71 | 93% | 71% | 50% | 29% | 21% | 7% | 64% | 29% | 14% | 21% | 7% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 14 | 2.64 | 93% | 86% | 43% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 50% | 50% | 7% | 43% | 0% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 14 | 2.50 | 86% | 64% | 36% | 29% | 21% | 14% | 50% | 43% | 21% | 29% | 7% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 14 | 2.43 | 93% | 79% | 36% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 36% | 43% | 29% | 36% | 21% |
| Yanbian Longding | 14 | 2.43 | 86% | 71% | 50% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 57% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% |
| Nanjing City | 15 | 2.33 | 93% | 73% | 40% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 27% | 20% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 14 | 2.21 | 100% | 50% | 29% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 36% | 57% | 7% | 57% | 7% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 15 | 2.07 | 80% | 53% | 47% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 15 | 1.93 | 87% | 60% | 33% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 47% | 33% | 33% | 20% | 20% |
| Foshan Nashi FC | 14 | 3.71 | 100% | 86% | 64% | 57% | 43% | 21% | 57% | 14% | 29% | 14% | 29% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 14 | 3.36 | 100% | 86% | 57% | 36% | 21% | 21% | 71% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 15 | 3.20 | 100% | 87% | 67% | 40% | 20% | 7% | 73% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| Changchun Yatai | 14 | 3.14 | 100% | 93% | 71% | 43% | 7% | 0% | 79% | 0% | 21% | 0% | 21% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 15 | 3.00 | 100% | 80% | 60% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 53% | 20% | 27% | 20% | 27% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 15 | 2.80 | 93% | 80% | 60% | 27% | 20% | 0% | 47% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 27% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 14 | 2.79 | 93% | 71% | 43% | 36% | 14% | 14% | 71% | 7% | 29% | 0% | 21% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 15 | 2.60 | 73% | 60% | 53% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 33% | 47% | 47% | 20% | 20% |
| Yanbian Longding | 15 | 2.53 | 87% | 73% | 47% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 47% | 33% | 33% | 20% | 20% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 14 | 2.50 | 100% | 71% | 43% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 50% | 29% | 21% | 29% | 21% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 14 | 2.50 | 93% | 64% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 7% | 43% | 21% | 43% | 14% | 36% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 15 | 2.40 | 93% | 73% | 47% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 53% | 7% | 47% | 0% | 40% |
| Nanjing City | 14 | 2.36 | 93% | 71% | 36% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 57% | 14% | 36% | 7% | 29% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 15 | 2.13 | 87% | 60% | 40% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 40% | 27% | 47% | 13% | 33% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 14 | 1.93 | 79% | 57% | 43% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 43% | 29% | 50% | 7% | 29% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 1.80 | 73% | 53% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 53% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 7% |
| ... | |||||||||||||
| Promedio de liga | 91.4% | 72.8% | 50.0% | 27.6% | 14.7% | 6.9% | 54.3% | 27.2% | 27.2% | 18.5% | 18.5% | ||
| Promedio de liga | 91.4% | 67.2% | 40.6% | 27.3% | 17.2% | 4.7% | 49.2% | 29.7% | 29.7% | 21.1% | 21.1% | ||
| Promedio de liga | 91.4% | 72.8% | 50.0% | 27.6% | 14.7% | 6.9% | 54.3% | 32.8% | 21.6% | 24.1% | 12.9% | ||
| Promedio de liga | 91.4% | 72.8% | 50.0% | 27.6% | 14.7% | 6.9% | 54.3% | 21.6% | 32.8% | 12.9% | 24.1% | ||
LISTANDO SOLO 5 EQUIPOS
La versión para Miembros muestra la tabla completa para los usuarios conectados.
Información de Membresía de SoccerSTATS.com
Goles Marcados + Encajados (Primera Parte)
| Teams (Total) ↕ | GP ↕ | Avg ↕ | 0.5+ ↕ | 1.5+ ↕ | 2.5+ ↕ | 3.5+ ↕ | 4.5+ ↕ | 5.5+ ↕ | BTS ↕ | CS ↕ | FTS ↕ | WTN ↕ | LTN ↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 29 | 1.62 | 76% | 52% | 17% | 7% | 7% | 3% | 34% | 45% | 45% | 21% | 21% |
| Changchun Yatai | 29 | 1.55 | 76% | 52% | 17% | 7% | 3% | 0% | 31% | 45% | 48% | 21% | 24% |
| Foshan Nashi FC | 29 | 1.52 | 83% | 45% | 17% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 14% | 28% | 76% | 10% | 59% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 29 | 1.38 | 72% | 41% | 21% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 28% | 52% | 48% | 24% | 21% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 29 | 1.34 | 83% | 38% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 34% | 62% | 17% | 45% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 29 | 1.34 | 69% | 45% | 17% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 28% | 59% | 45% | 28% | 14% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 29 | 1.31 | 76% | 48% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 76% | 31% | 52% | 7% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 29 | 1.21 | 69% | 28% | 14% | 7% | 3% | 0% | 17% | 62% | 52% | 31% | 21% |
| Yanbian Longding | 29 | 1.17 | 76% | 34% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 52% | 52% | 28% | 28% |
| Nanjing City | 29 | 1.14 | 83% | 28% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 45% | 55% | 28% | 38% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 29 | 1.10 | 62% | 34% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 48% | 69% | 10% | 31% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 29 | 1.07 | 59% | 28% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 10% | 69% | 62% | 28% | 21% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 29 | 1.00 | 66% | 28% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 59% | 59% | 24% | 24% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 29 | 0.97 | 62% | 24% | 7% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 72% | 52% | 34% | 14% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 29 | 0.90 | 62% | 17% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10% | 62% | 66% | 24% | 28% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 29 | 0.83 | 52% | 24% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10% | 76% | 62% | 28% | 14% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 14 | 1.71 | 71% | 57% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 43% | 57% | 29% | 29% | 0% |
| Changchun Yatai | 15 | 1.60 | 73% | 53% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 20% | 53% | 53% | 27% | 27% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 1.60 | 93% | 47% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 27% | 60% | 20% | 53% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 15 | 1.53 | 80% | 47% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 47% | 40% | 27% | 20% |
| Nanjing City | 15 | 1.33 | 87% | 40% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 40% | 47% | 27% | 33% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 14 | 1.29 | 79% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 71% | 29% | 50% | 7% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 14 | 1.21 | 57% | 43% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 79% | 50% | 36% | 7% |
| Foshan Nashi FC | 15 | 1.20 | 67% | 47% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 40% | 80% | 7% | 47% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 15 | 1.20 | 73% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 53% | 47% | 27% | 20% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 14 | 1.14 | 71% | 29% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 29% | 36% | 64% | 7% | 36% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 14 | 1.14 | 64% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 14% | 64% | 57% | 29% | 21% |
| Yanbian Longding | 14 | 1.14 | 86% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 43% | 57% | 29% | 43% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 15 | 1.13 | 73% | 33% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 60% | 53% | 33% | 27% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 14 | 0.86 | 50% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 86% | 57% | 36% | 7% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 15 | 0.73 | 53% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 67% | 73% | 20% | 27% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 14 | 0.57 | 43% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 71% | 79% | 14% | 21% |
| Foshan Nashi FC | 14 | 1.86 | 100% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 14% | 14% | 71% | 14% | 71% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 15 | 1.53 | 80% | 47% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 27% | 33% | 60% | 13% | 40% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 15 | 1.53 | 73% | 40% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 13% | 67% | 47% | 40% | 20% |
| Changchun Yatai | 14 | 1.50 | 79% | 50% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 43% | 36% | 43% | 14% | 21% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 15 | 1.47 | 80% | 47% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 15 | 1.33 | 73% | 47% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 80% | 33% | 53% | 7% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 15 | 1.27 | 73% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 20% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 14 | 1.21 | 64% | 36% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 57% | 57% | 21% | 21% |
| Yanbian Longding | 15 | 1.20 | 67% | 47% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 60% | 47% | 27% | 13% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 14 | 1.07 | 71% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 43% | 64% | 14% | 36% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 14 | 1.07 | 71% | 21% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 57% | 57% | 29% | 29% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 1.07 | 73% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 20% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 15 | 1.07 | 53% | 40% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 60% | 73% | 13% | 27% |
| Nanjing City | 14 | 0.93 | 79% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 50% | 64% | 29% | 43% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 14 | 0.79 | 57% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 64% | 71% | 21% | 29% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 14 | 0.50 | 29% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 93% | 71% | 21% | 0% |
| ... | |||||||||||||
| Promedio de liga | 70.3% | 35.3% | 11.6% | 2.6% | 1.3% | 0.4% | 19.4% | 55.2% | 55.2% | 25.4% | 25.4% | ||
| Promedio de liga | 70.3% | 35.3% | 11.6% | 2.6% | 1.3% | 0.4% | 19.4% | 55.6% | 54.7% | 25.9% | 25.0% | ||
| Promedio de liga | 70.3% | 35.3% | 11.6% | 2.6% | 1.3% | 0.4% | 19.4% | 54.7% | 55.6% | 25.0% | 25.9% | ||
LISTANDO SOLO 5 EQUIPOS
La versión para Miembros muestra la tabla completa para los usuarios conectados.
Información de Membresía de SoccerSTATS.com
Goles Marcados + Encajados (Segunda Parte)
| Teams (Total) ↕ | GP ↕ | Avg ↕ | 0.5+ ↕ | 1.5+ ↕ | 2.5+ ↕ | 3.5+ ↕ | 4.5+ ↕ | 5.5+ ↕ | BTS ↕ | CS ↕ | FTS ↕ | WTN ↕ | LTN ↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foshan Nashi FC | 29 | 1.83 | 86% | 45% | 31% | 14% | 3% | 3% | 28% | 38% | 48% | 24% | 34% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 29 | 1.79 | 86% | 48% | 31% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 34% | 48% | 31% | 34% | 17% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 29 | 1.72 | 83% | 52% | 24% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 38% | 31% | 48% | 14% | 31% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 29 | 1.62 | 76% | 48% | 21% | 14% | 3% | 0% | 34% | 48% | 41% | 24% | 17% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 29 | 1.62 | 72% | 45% | 24% | 14% | 3% | 3% | 28% | 38% | 62% | 10% | 34% |
| Changchun Yatai | 29 | 1.59 | 83% | 41% | 31% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 38% | 41% | 38% | 24% | 21% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 29 | 1.52 | 83% | 38% | 28% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 55% | 41% | 38% | 24% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 29 | 1.52 | 76% | 38% | 24% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 31% | 45% | 48% | 21% | 24% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 29 | 1.52 | 79% | 45% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 55% | 41% | 34% | 21% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 29 | 1.48 | 66% | 45% | 21% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 28% | 55% | 52% | 21% | 17% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 29 | 1.31 | 72% | 38% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 62% | 45% | 34% | 17% |
| Yanbian Longding | 29 | 1.31 | 72% | 34% | 17% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 17% | 59% | 52% | 31% | 24% |
| Nanjing City | 29 | 1.21 | 76% | 24% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 14% | 48% | 62% | 24% | 38% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 29 | 1.10 | 62% | 31% | 14% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 52% | 69% | 14% | 31% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 29 | 1.07 | 59% | 31% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 52% | 66% | 10% | 24% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 29 | 1.03 | 62% | 24% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 66% | 48% | 28% | 10% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 14 | 1.93 | 71% | 57% | 29% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 43% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 7% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 15 | 1.87 | 80% | 47% | 40% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 33% | 53% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| Foshan Nashi FC | 15 | 1.80 | 87% | 47% | 27% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 27% | 33% | 53% | 20% | 40% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 1.80 | 87% | 53% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 27% | 53% | 13% | 40% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 14 | 1.71 | 86% | 43% | 36% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 57% | 21% | 43% | 7% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 14 | 1.57 | 71% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 29% | 64% | 36% | 36% | 7% |
| Changchun Yatai | 15 | 1.53 | 87% | 33% | 27% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 53% | 33% | 40% | 20% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 14 | 1.36 | 71% | 43% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 14% | 71% | 43% | 43% | 14% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 14 | 1.36 | 86% | 29% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 29% | 64% | 21% | 50% | 7% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 15 | 1.33 | 73% | 40% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 40% | 53% | 13% | 27% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 15 | 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 53% | 53% | 20% | 20% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 14 | 1.29 | 64% | 43% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 50% | 50% | 14% | 14% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 14 | 1.29 | 71% | 36% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 21% |
| Yanbian Longding | 14 | 1.29 | 64% | 43% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 71% | 43% | 36% | 7% |
| Nanjing City | 15 | 1.00 | 73% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 60% | 60% | 33% | 33% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 15 | 0.80 | 53% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 67% | 67% | 20% | 20% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 14 | 2.14 | 93% | 64% | 36% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 43% | 21% | 43% | 14% | 36% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 15 | 1.87 | 80% | 53% | 33% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 53% | 27% | 40% | 7% | 20% |
| Foshan Nashi FC | 14 | 1.86 | 86% | 43% | 36% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 29% | 43% | 43% | 29% | 29% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 15 | 1.73 | 87% | 53% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 47% | 33% | 33% | 20% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 14 | 1.71 | 93% | 50% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 43% | 29% | 36% | 21% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 14 | 1.71 | 86% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 36% | 43% | 21% | 29% |
| Changchun Yatai | 14 | 1.64 | 79% | 50% | 36% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 29% | 43% | 7% | 21% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 14 | 1.43 | 57% | 36% | 29% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 21% | 50% | 71% | 7% | 29% |
| Nanjing City | 14 | 1.43 | 79% | 29% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 21% | 36% | 64% | 14% | 43% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 14 | 1.43 | 71% | 43% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 36% | 71% | 7% | 43% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 15 | 1.33 | 80% | 33% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 53% | 60% | 33% | 40% |
| Yanbian Longding | 15 | 1.33 | 80% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 13% | 47% | 60% | 27% | 40% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 15 | 1.07 | 73% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 60% | 53% | 33% | 27% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 15 | 1.07 | 60% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 60% | 67% | 20% | 27% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 15 | 0.87 | 53% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 53% | 80% | 7% | 33% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 0.73 | 40% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 67% | 73% | 7% | 13% |
| ... | |||||||||||||
| Promedio de liga | 74.6% | 39.2% | 21.6% | 7.3% | 1.7% | 0.9% | 26.3% | 49.6% | 49.6% | 24.1% | 24.1% | ||
| Promedio de liga | 74.6% | 39.2% | 21.6% | 7.3% | 1.7% | 0.9% | 26.3% | 54.7% | 44.4% | 29.3% | 19.0% | ||
| Promedio de liga | 74.6% | 39.2% | 21.6% | 7.3% | 1.7% | 0.9% | 26.3% | 44.4% | 54.7% | 19.0% | 29.3% | ||
LISTANDO SOLO 5 EQUIPOS
La versión para Miembros muestra la tabla completa para los usuarios conectados.
Información de Membresía de SoccerSTATS.com
Ambos Equipos Marcan
No Logró Marcar
Porterías a Cero
Marcó en Ambas Partes
Resumen de la temporada
Impacto del Primer Gol y Retención de Ventaja
Local marcó primero:
47.8%
Ningún gol marcado:
8.6%
Visitante marcó primero:
43.5%
Minuto prom. local marcó primero: 34.0 min.
Minuto prom. vis. marcó primero: 27.3 min.
Puntos Por Partido tras marcar primero: 2.28
Puntos Por Partido tras encajar primero: 0.50
Tasa de defensa de ventaja local:
65.5%
Tasa de defensa de ventaja visitante:
51.5%
Tasa de empate local:
48.5%
Tasa de empate visitante:
34.5%
Duración de ventaja local:
26.2%
Equipos empatados a goles:
49.5%
Duración de ventaja visitante:
24.3%
Access Denied
Your current synced membership level is: None
The full Export feature for this table is available with a Supporter Membership.