China pr - Super League
2026 ▼
Estadísticas ▼
Últimos resultados
Partidos
Tablas de Forma
Goles
Descanso
Tiempos
Estadísticas del Primer Gol
Cuadrícula de Resultados
Tablas Local y Visitante
Tablas por Fecha
Tabla ampliada
Índice de Rendimiento de Puntos
Análisis de la Recta Final
Puntos Proyectados
Goles Totales
Rangos de Goles
Goles Promedio
Marcados vs Encajados
Márgenes de Goles
Duraciones con Ventaja
Rachas Actuales
Empates (Remontadas)
Ligas ▼
China PR - super-league: Goles
Membership Simulator:
Goles Marcados + Encajados
| Teams (Total) ↕ | GP ↕ | Avg ↕ | 0.5+ ↕ | 1.5+ ↕ | 2.5+ ↕ | 3.5+ ↕ | 4.5+ ↕ | 5.5+ ↕ | BTS ↕ | CS ↕ | FTS ↕ | WTN ↕ | LTN ↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yunnan Yukun | 29 | 4.03 | 97% | 90% | 79% | 55% | 38% | 28% | 76% | 17% | 10% | 14% | 7% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 29 | 3.90 | 100% | 90% | 72% | 59% | 34% | 10% | 72% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% |
| Zhejiang | 29 | 3.62 | 97% | 93% | 69% | 52% | 41% | 10% | 66% | 14% | 24% | 10% | 21% |
| Shandong Taishan | 29 | 3.59 | 100% | 90% | 69% | 45% | 31% | 14% | 72% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 29 | 3.41 | 97% | 86% | 55% | 52% | 28% | 14% | 72% | 14% | 17% | 10% | 14% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 29 | 3.31 | 97% | 83% | 62% | 48% | 28% | 14% | 62% | 7% | 34% | 3% | 31% |
| Beijing Guoan | 29 | 3.21 | 93% | 83% | 62% | 34% | 24% | 21% | 62% | 38% | 7% | 31% | 0% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 29 | 3.21 | 100% | 76% | 66% | 41% | 21% | 10% | 55% | 10% | 34% | 10% | 34% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 29 | 3.10 | 100% | 79% | 55% | 31% | 21% | 14% | 59% | 14% | 28% | 14% | 28% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 29 | 3.07 | 100% | 76% | 59% | 41% | 21% | 3% | 62% | 31% | 7% | 31% | 7% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 29 | 2.97 | 97% | 69% | 52% | 31% | 24% | 14% | 55% | 24% | 24% | 21% | 21% |
| Shanghai Port | 29 | 2.97 | 97% | 79% | 62% | 38% | 17% | 3% | 69% | 21% | 14% | 17% | 10% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 29 | 2.76 | 90% | 76% | 55% | 21% | 14% | 10% | 62% | 17% | 31% | 7% | 21% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 29 | 2.55 | 93% | 72% | 48% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 55% | 34% | 17% | 28% | 10% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 29 | 2.41 | 86% | 76% | 34% | 28% | 14% | 3% | 59% | 28% | 28% | 14% | 14% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 29 | 2.24 | 90% | 66% | 31% | 24% | 10% | 3% | 55% | 31% | 24% | 21% | 14% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 8 | 5.13 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 88% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 13% |
| Zhejiang | 8 | 4.75 | 100% | 100% | 88% | 75% | 75% | 38% | 75% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 8 | 4.25 | 100% | 88% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 63% | 25% | 13% | 25% | 13% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 8 | 4.00 | 100% | 88% | 75% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 63% | 13% | 25% | 13% | 25% |
| Shandong Taishan | 8 | 3.88 | 100% | 100% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 75% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 8 | 3.88 | 88% | 88% | 63% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 88% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 8 | 3.63 | 88% | 75% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 75% | 13% | 25% | 0% | 13% |
| Beijing Guoan | 8 | 3.50 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 38% | 38% | 50% | 50% | 13% | 38% | 0% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 8 | 3.25 | 100% | 88% | 75% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| Shanghai Port | 8 | 3.00 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 63% | 38% | 13% | 25% | 0% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 8 | 2.88 | 88% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 38% | 13% | 63% | 0% | 50% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 8 | 2.88 | 100% | 88% | 63% | 38% | 0% | 0% | 75% | 0% | 25% | 0% | 25% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 8 | 2.63 | 100% | 75% | 50% | 38% | 0% | 0% | 63% | 38% | 0% | 38% | 0% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 8 | 2.25 | 88% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 63% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 13% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 8 | 2.25 | 88% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 50% | 50% | 13% | 38% | 0% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 8 | 1.88 | 75% | 63% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 38% | 38% | 50% | 13% | 25% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 14 | 4.21 | 100% | 93% | 79% | 64% | 43% | 14% | 71% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% |
| Shandong Taishan | 14 | 3.71 | 100% | 100% | 79% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 86% | 14% | 0% | 14% | 0% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 14 | 3.71 | 100% | 86% | 79% | 57% | 29% | 14% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 29% | 7% |
| Zhejiang | 14 | 3.71 | 93% | 86% | 64% | 57% | 57% | 14% | 64% | 21% | 21% | 14% | 14% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 15 | 3.53 | 100% | 80% | 73% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 73% | 7% | 20% | 7% | 20% |
| Beijing Guoan | 14 | 3.29 | 100% | 86% | 64% | 36% | 21% | 21% | 64% | 36% | 0% | 36% | 0% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 14 | 3.14 | 93% | 71% | 57% | 50% | 29% | 14% | 50% | 14% | 43% | 7% | 36% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 15 | 3.13 | 100% | 67% | 53% | 33% | 20% | 20% | 53% | 27% | 20% | 27% | 20% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 15 | 3.13 | 100% | 73% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 60% | 27% | 13% | 27% | 13% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 14 | 3.07 | 100% | 79% | 64% | 43% | 21% | 0% | 64% | 36% | 0% | 36% | 0% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 3.07 | 93% | 80% | 47% | 47% | 20% | 7% | 60% | 27% | 20% | 20% | 13% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 15 | 3.00 | 93% | 80% | 67% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 73% | 27% | 7% | 20% | 0% |
| Shanghai Port | 14 | 2.64 | 93% | 86% | 57% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 64% | 29% | 14% | 21% | 7% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 15 | 2.53 | 93% | 73% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 60% | 33% | 13% | 27% | 7% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 15 | 2.47 | 87% | 67% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 47% | 27% | 40% | 13% | 27% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 15 | 2.13 | 87% | 80% | 27% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 60% | 33% | 20% | 20% | 7% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 15 | 4.33 | 93% | 93% | 80% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 87% | 7% | 13% | 0% | 7% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 14 | 3.79 | 100% | 93% | 64% | 57% | 36% | 21% | 86% | 0% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 3.60 | 100% | 87% | 67% | 53% | 27% | 7% | 73% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| Zhejiang | 15 | 3.53 | 100% | 100% | 73% | 47% | 27% | 7% | 67% | 7% | 27% | 7% | 27% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 15 | 3.47 | 100% | 93% | 67% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 73% | 0% | 27% | 0% | 27% |
| Shandong Taishan | 15 | 3.47 | 100% | 80% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 13% | 60% | 13% | 27% | 13% | 27% |
| Shanghai Port | 15 | 3.27 | 100% | 73% | 67% | 53% | 27% | 7% | 73% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| Beijing Guoan | 15 | 3.13 | 87% | 80% | 60% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 60% | 40% | 13% | 27% | 0% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 14 | 3.07 | 93% | 86% | 71% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 79% | 7% | 21% | 0% | 14% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 14 | 3.07 | 100% | 86% | 57% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 57% | 0% | 43% | 0% | 43% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 15 | 3.07 | 100% | 73% | 53% | 40% | 20% | 7% | 60% | 27% | 13% | 27% | 13% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 14 | 2.86 | 100% | 71% | 57% | 43% | 14% | 0% | 36% | 14% | 50% | 14% | 50% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 14 | 2.79 | 93% | 71% | 50% | 29% | 29% | 7% | 57% | 21% | 29% | 14% | 21% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 14 | 2.71 | 86% | 71% | 43% | 36% | 29% | 7% | 57% | 21% | 36% | 7% | 21% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 14 | 2.07 | 93% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 36% | 43% | 29% | 36% | 21% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 14 | 1.93 | 86% | 57% | 29% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 29% | 36% | 14% | 21% |
| ... | |||||||||||||
| Promedio de liga | 95.7% | 80.2% | 58.2% | 38.8% | 23.7% | 11.2% | 63.4% | 20.5% | 20.5% | 16.2% | 16.2% | ||
| Promedio de liga | 93.0% | 79.7% | 59.4% | 44.5% | 28.1% | 17.2% | 63.3% | 21.1% | 22.7% | 14.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Promedio de liga | 95.7% | 80.2% | 58.2% | 38.8% | 23.7% | 11.2% | 63.4% | 25.0% | 15.9% | 20.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Promedio de liga | 95.7% | 80.2% | 58.2% | 38.8% | 23.7% | 11.2% | 63.4% | 15.9% | 25.0% | 11.6% | 20.7% | ||
LISTANDO SOLO 5 EQUIPOS
La versión para Miembros muestra la tabla completa para los usuarios conectados.
Información de Membresía de SoccerSTATS.com
Goles Marcados + Encajados (Primera Parte)
| Teams (Total) ↕ | GP ↕ | Avg ↕ | 0.5+ ↕ | 1.5+ ↕ | 2.5+ ↕ | 3.5+ ↕ | 4.5+ ↕ | 5.5+ ↕ | BTS ↕ | CS ↕ | FTS ↕ | WTN ↕ | LTN ↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yunnan Yukun | 29 | 1.90 | 86% | 45% | 31% | 14% | 10% | 3% | 24% | 45% | 45% | 31% | 31% |
| Shandong Taishan | 29 | 1.76 | 90% | 48% | 28% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 45% | 45% | 34% | 34% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 29 | 1.72 | 79% | 59% | 31% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 38% | 41% | 41% | 21% | 21% |
| Zhejiang | 29 | 1.62 | 86% | 48% | 21% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 28% | 38% | 48% | 24% | 34% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 29 | 1.45 | 69% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 48% | 59% | 17% | 28% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 29 | 1.41 | 72% | 41% | 17% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 14% | 45% | 69% | 17% | 41% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 29 | 1.38 | 76% | 34% | 24% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 48% | 52% | 24% | 28% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 29 | 1.38 | 83% | 45% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 38% | 66% | 21% | 48% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 29 | 1.34 | 66% | 41% | 17% | 7% | 3% | 0% | 24% | 48% | 62% | 14% | 28% |
| Shanghai Port | 29 | 1.14 | 66% | 34% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 59% | 52% | 24% | 17% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 29 | 1.07 | 72% | 28% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10% | 69% | 48% | 41% | 21% |
| Beijing Guoan | 29 | 1.00 | 62% | 31% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 79% | 52% | 41% | 14% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 29 | 1.00 | 52% | 28% | 17% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 76% | 55% | 28% | 7% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 29 | 1.00 | 66% | 31% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 66% | 48% | 31% | 14% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 29 | 0.97 | 59% | 31% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 62% | 72% | 21% | 31% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 29 | 0.83 | 62% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 66% | 59% | 28% | 21% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 14 | 2.00 | 79% | 64% | 50% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 14% |
| Shandong Taishan | 14 | 1.86 | 86% | 57% | 29% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 50% | 43% | 36% | 29% |
| Zhejiang | 14 | 1.64 | 79% | 50% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 21% | 57% | 43% | 36% | 21% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 14 | 1.57 | 79% | 43% | 36% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 29% | 43% | 50% | 21% | 29% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 14 | 1.57 | 86% | 50% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 50% | 43% | 36% | 29% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 1.40 | 73% | 33% | 27% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 53% | 47% | 27% | 20% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 14 | 1.29 | 64% | 36% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 64% | 64% | 29% | 29% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 15 | 1.27 | 73% | 47% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 53% | 53% | 27% | 27% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 15 | 1.13 | 60% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 80% | 47% | 40% | 7% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 15 | 1.13 | 60% | 40% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 60% | 67% | 20% | 27% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 15 | 1.13 | 60% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 13% | 67% | 60% | 27% | 20% |
| Shanghai Port | 14 | 1.07 | 64% | 36% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 57% | 57% | 21% | 21% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 15 | 1.07 | 73% | 27% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 67% | 53% | 40% | 27% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 15 | 1.07 | 80% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 47% | 53% | 27% | 33% |
| Beijing Guoan | 14 | 1.00 | 64% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 79% | 50% | 43% | 14% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 15 | 0.87 | 67% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 73% | 40% | 40% | 7% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 15 | 2.20 | 87% | 40% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 47% | 27% | 33% |
| Shandong Taishan | 15 | 1.67 | 93% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 40% | 47% | 33% | 40% |
| Zhejiang | 15 | 1.60 | 93% | 47% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 20% | 53% | 13% | 47% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 14 | 1.57 | 71% | 57% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 29% | 64% | 0% | 36% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 15 | 1.53 | 80% | 47% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 27% | 73% | 7% | 53% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 14 | 1.50 | 93% | 43% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 21% | 79% | 14% | 71% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 14 | 1.50 | 64% | 50% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 43% | 71% | 7% | 36% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 1.47 | 80% | 53% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 47% | 47% | 27% | 27% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 15 | 1.20 | 73% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 53% | 53% | 27% | 27% |
| Shanghai Port | 15 | 1.20 | 67% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 60% | 47% | 27% | 13% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 14 | 1.14 | 64% | 43% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 57% | 57% | 21% | 21% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 14 | 1.07 | 71% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 71% | 43% | 43% | 14% |
| Beijing Guoan | 15 | 1.00 | 60% | 33% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 80% | 53% | 40% | 13% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 14 | 0.86 | 43% | 29% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 71% | 64% | 14% | 7% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 14 | 0.79 | 57% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 64% | 79% | 21% | 36% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 14 | 0.57 | 43% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 86% | 64% | 29% | 7% |
| ... | |||||||||||||
| Promedio de liga | 71.6% | 37.9% | 15.9% | 3.9% | 1.3% | 0.4% | 19.4% | 54.5% | 54.5% | 26.1% | 26.1% | ||
| Promedio de liga | 71.6% | 37.9% | 15.9% | 3.9% | 1.3% | 0.4% | 19.4% | 58.6% | 50.4% | 30.2% | 22.0% | ||
| Promedio de liga | 71.6% | 37.9% | 15.9% | 3.9% | 1.3% | 0.4% | 19.4% | 50.4% | 58.6% | 22.0% | 30.2% | ||
LISTANDO SOLO 5 EQUIPOS
La versión para Miembros muestra la tabla completa para los usuarios conectados.
Información de Membresía de SoccerSTATS.com
Goles Marcados + Encajados (Segunda Parte)
| Teams (Total) ↕ | GP ↕ | Avg ↕ | 0.5+ ↕ | 1.5+ ↕ | 2.5+ ↕ | 3.5+ ↕ | 4.5+ ↕ | 5.5+ ↕ | BTS ↕ | CS ↕ | FTS ↕ | WTN ↕ | LTN ↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Guoan | 29 | 2.21 | 93% | 59% | 41% | 24% | 3% | 0% | 38% | 48% | 21% | 41% | 14% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 29 | 2.17 | 93% | 69% | 31% | 14% | 7% | 3% | 34% | 38% | 34% | 31% | 28% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 29 | 2.14 | 93% | 66% | 31% | 17% | 7% | 0% | 38% | 34% | 34% | 28% | 28% |
| Zhejiang | 29 | 2.00 | 93% | 59% | 31% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 31% | 31% | 45% | 24% | 38% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 29 | 1.97 | 93% | 55% | 24% | 17% | 3% | 3% | 31% | 45% | 31% | 38% | 24% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 29 | 1.97 | 90% | 59% | 31% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 48% | 28% | 34% | 17% | 24% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 29 | 1.90 | 86% | 52% | 34% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 41% | 21% | 52% | 7% | 38% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 29 | 1.83 | 90% | 52% | 28% | 7% | 3% | 3% | 31% | 38% | 41% | 28% | 31% |
| Shandong Taishan | 29 | 1.83 | 90% | 55% | 28% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 38% | 41% | 31% | 31% | 21% |
| Shanghai Port | 29 | 1.83 | 86% | 52% | 34% | 7% | 3% | 0% | 41% | 45% | 28% | 31% | 14% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 29 | 1.76 | 86% | 55% | 21% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 38% | 31% | 45% | 17% | 31% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 29 | 1.72 | 79% | 55% | 24% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 38% | 45% | 38% | 24% | 17% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 29 | 1.69 | 86% | 52% | 21% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 62% | 31% | 48% | 17% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 29 | 1.69 | 79% | 55% | 17% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 28% | 31% | 62% | 10% | 41% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 29 | 1.41 | 76% | 31% | 21% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 24% | 45% | 55% | 21% | 31% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 29 | 1.28 | 79% | 31% | 10% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 52% | 52% | 31% | 31% |
| Beijing Guoan | 14 | 2.29 | 100% | 64% | 43% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 36% | 43% | 21% | 43% | 21% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 15 | 2.27 | 100% | 67% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 53% | 13% | 33% | 13% | 33% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 14 | 2.21 | 93% | 71% | 29% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 14% | 43% | 50% | 36% | 43% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 14 | 2.14 | 100% | 64% | 36% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 50% | 29% | 50% | 29% |
| Zhejiang | 14 | 2.07 | 86% | 57% | 43% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 43% | 36% | 29% | 21% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 15 | 2.00 | 93% | 53% | 20% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 33% | 40% | 33% | 33% | 27% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 15 | 2.00 | 87% | 60% | 33% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 13% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 15 | 1.93 | 80% | 60% | 33% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 20% | 13% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 14 | 1.86 | 86% | 50% | 36% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 21% | 57% | 7% | 43% |
| Shandong Taishan | 14 | 1.86 | 100% | 57% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 43% | 7% | 43% | 7% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 1.67 | 80% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 40% | 33% | 47% | 13% | 27% |
| Shanghai Port | 14 | 1.57 | 71% | 50% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 36% | 64% | 29% | 36% | 0% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 14 | 1.50 | 86% | 50% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 79% | 21% | 64% | 7% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 15 | 1.40 | 80% | 33% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 47% | 47% | 27% | 27% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 15 | 1.40 | 73% | 40% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 40% | 67% | 13% | 40% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 15 | 1.27 | 80% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 47% | 53% | 27% | 33% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 14 | 2.29 | 100% | 71% | 36% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 57% | 21% | 21% | 21% | 21% |
| Beijing Guoan | 15 | 2.13 | 87% | 53% | 40% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 40% | 53% | 20% | 40% | 7% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 2.13 | 93% | 67% | 33% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 53% | 33% | 20% | 27% | 13% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 15 | 2.13 | 87% | 67% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 53% | 20% | 40% | 7% | 27% |
| Shanghai Port | 15 | 2.07 | 100% | 53% | 47% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 47% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 27% |
| Henan Songshan Longm | 14 | 2.00 | 86% | 71% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 36% | 21% | 57% | 7% | 43% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 15 | 1.93 | 87% | 53% | 33% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 47% | 20% | 47% | 7% | 33% |
| Zhejiang | 15 | 1.93 | 100% | 60% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 20% | 53% | 20% | 53% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 14 | 1.93 | 93% | 57% | 29% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 29% | 50% | 29% | 43% | 21% |
| Dalian Yingbo | 15 | 1.87 | 87% | 53% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 27% |
| Shandong Taishan | 15 | 1.80 | 80% | 53% | 27% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 40% | 53% | 20% | 33% |
| Qingdao West Coast | 14 | 1.57 | 71% | 29% | 29% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 29% | 43% | 57% | 14% | 29% |
| Shenzhen Peng City | 14 | 1.50 | 86% | 50% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 29% | 64% | 14% | 50% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 14 | 1.50 | 79% | 50% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 29% | 50% | 43% | 29% | 21% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 14 | 1.36 | 79% | 36% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 64% | 50% | 43% | 29% |
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 14 | 1.14 | 79% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 57% | 57% | 36% | 36% |
| ... | |||||||||||||
| Promedio de liga | 87.1% | 53.4% | 26.7% | 13.4% | 2.2% | 0.9% | 33.6% | 39.7% | 39.7% | 26.7% | 26.7% | ||
| Promedio de liga | 87.1% | 53.4% | 26.7% | 13.4% | 2.2% | 0.9% | 33.6% | 42.2% | 37.1% | 29.3% | 24.1% | ||
| Promedio de liga | 87.1% | 53.4% | 26.7% | 13.4% | 2.2% | 0.9% | 33.6% | 37.1% | 42.2% | 24.1% | 29.3% | ||
LISTANDO SOLO 5 EQUIPOS
La versión para Miembros muestra la tabla completa para los usuarios conectados.
Información de Membresía de SoccerSTATS.com
Ambos Equipos Marcan
No Logró Marcar
Porterías a Cero
Marcó en Ambas Partes
Resumen de la temporada
Impacto del Primer Gol y Retención de Ventaja
Local marcó primero:
56.5%
Ningún gol marcado:
4.3%
Visitante marcó primero:
39.2%
Minuto prom. local marcó primero: 29.2 min.
Minuto prom. vis. marcó primero: 33.3 min.
Puntos Por Partido tras marcar primero: 2.07
Puntos Por Partido tras encajar primero: 0.70
Tasa de defensa de ventaja local:
58.0%
Tasa de defensa de ventaja visitante:
54.3%
Tasa de empate local:
45.7%
Tasa de empate visitante:
42.0%
Duración de ventaja local:
32.9%
Equipos empatados a goles:
46.5%
Duración de ventaja visitante:
20.6%
Access Denied
Your current synced membership level is: None
The full Export feature for this table is available with a Supporter Membership.