Membership Simulator:
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
1
2
Charleston Battery
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
vs
Charleston Battery
Lead durations (90 minutes of regular time)
Match result analysis
Pittsburgh Riverhoun after 30 matches
Charleston Battery after 30 matches
Points Per Game (PPG)
| Home |
1.87 |
|
1.60 |
Away |
| Total |
1.47 |
|
2.07 |
Total |
Team Stats vs League Average
Pittsburgh Riverhoun (AT HOME)
vs league average
Charleston Battery (AWAY)
vs league average
Pittsburgh Riverhoun (TOTAL)
vs league average
Charleston Battery (TOTAL)
vs league average
Contextual averages
| Pittsburgh Riverhoun |
AVG |
Charleston Battery |
| (home matches) |
|
(away matches) |
| Played |
15 |
|
15 |
Played |
|
| Avg Scored |
1.20 |
1.20 |
1.20 |
Avg Conceded |
| Avg Conceded |
0.80 |
1.13 |
1.47 |
Avg Scored |
| Avg Total Goals (GF+GA) |
2.00 |
2.33 |
2.67 |
Avg Total Goals (GF+GA) |
|
| Scoring Rate |
80% |
83% |
87% |
Conceding Rate |
| Conceding Rate |
53% |
63% |
73% |
Scoring Rate |
|
| Clean sheets |
47% |
37% |
27% |
Failed to score |
| Failed to score |
20% |
17% |
13% |
Clean sheets |
|
| Scored in both halves |
27% |
13% |
0% |
Conceded in both halves |
| Conceded in both halves |
13% |
23% |
33% |
Scored in both halves |
|
| Scored first |
60% |
57% |
53% |
Conceded first |
| Conceded first |
33% |
37% |
40% |
Scored first |
|
| Leading at HT |
33% |
23% |
13% |
Losing at HT |
| Losing at HT |
7% |
23% |
40% |
Leading at HT |
|
| AVG minute GF |
50' |
49' |
47' |
AVG minute GA |
| AVG minute GA |
60' |
50' |
39' |
AVG minute GF |
|
| GF+GA > 0.5 |
93% |
93% |
93% |
GF+GA > 0.5 |
| GF+GA > 1.5 |
73% |
73% |
73% |
GF+GA > 1.5 |
| GF+GA > 2.5 |
27% |
43% |
60% |
GF+GA > 2.5 |
| GF+GA > 3.5 |
7% |
20% |
33% |
GF+GA > 3.5 |
| GF+GA > 4.5 |
0% |
3% |
7% |
GF+GA > 4.5 |
| GF+GA > .55 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
GF+GA > .55 |
|
| Both teams scored |
40% |
53% |
67% |
Both teams scored |
|
| GF+GA > 0.5 at HT |
53% |
57% |
60% |
GF+GA > 0.5 at HT |
| GF+GA > 1.5 at HT |
20% |
30% |
40% |
GF+GA > 1.5 at HT |
| GF+GA > 2.5 at HT |
7% |
17% |
27% |
GF+GA > 2.5 at HT |
Comparison with league average
Pittsburgh Riverhoun (15 home matches) vs league average AT HOME
| (home matches) |
Pittsburgh Riverhoun |
League |
| points per game |
1.87
|
|
1.59 |
| % Wins |
53%
|
|
44% |
| % Draws |
27%
|
|
26% |
| % Defeats |
20%
|
|
29% |
| Goals scored per game |
1.20
|
|
1.51 |
| Goals conceded per game |
0.80
|
|
1.19 |
| % Clean sheets |
47%
|
|
31% |
| % Failed To Score |
20%
|
|
23% |
| % Won To Nil |
40%
|
|
23% |
| % Lost To Nil |
13%
|
|
15% |
| % Team scored first |
60%
|
|
51% |
| % Opponent scored first |
33%
|
|
41% |
| Average minute scored first |
41
|
|
31 |
| Average minute conceded first |
49
|
|
32 |
| Lead-defending rate |
80%
|
|
64% |
| Equalizing rate |
50%
|
|
49% |
| % Time leading |
31%
|
|
30% |
| % Time level in goals |
59%
|
|
49% |
| % Time trailing |
10%
|
|
21% |
| PPG when scored first |
2.67
|
|
2.33 |
| PPG when conceded first |
0.60
|
|
0.77 |
| Total goals per game |
2.00
|
|
2.70 |
| % over 1.5 goals |
73%
|
|
73% |
| % over 2.5 goals |
27%
|
|
51% |
| % over 3.5 goals |
7%
|
|
29% |
| % both teams scored |
40%
|
|
54% |
Charleston Battery (15 away matches) vs league average AWAY
| (away matches) |
Charleston Battery |
League |
| points per game |
1.60
|
|
1.15 |
| % Wins |
47%
|
|
29% |
| % Draws |
20%
|
|
26% |
| % Defeats |
33%
|
|
44% |
| Goals scored per game |
1.47
|
|
1.19 |
| Goals conceded per game |
1.20
|
|
1.51 |
| % Clean sheets |
13%
|
|
23% |
| % Failed To Score |
27%
|
|
31% |
| % Won To Nil |
7%
|
|
15% |
| % Lost To Nil |
20%
|
|
23% |
| % Team scored first |
40%
|
|
41% |
| % Opponent scored first |
53%
|
|
51% |
| Average minute scored first |
19
|
|
32 |
| Average minute conceded first |
34
|
|
31 |
| Lead-defending rate |
78%
|
|
51% |
| Equalizing rate |
38%
|
|
36% |
| % Time leading |
35%
|
|
21% |
| % Time level in goals |
41%
|
|
49% |
| % Time trailing |
23%
|
|
30% |
| PPG when scored first |
2.67
|
|
1.98 |
| PPG when conceded first |
0.88
|
|
0.50 |
| Total goals per game |
2.67
|
|
2.70 |
| % over 1.5 goals |
73%
|
|
73% |
| % over 2.5 goals |
60%
|
|
51% |
| % over 3.5 goals |
33%
|
|
29% |
| % both teams scored |
67%
|
|
54% |
Goal times
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
Total
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (Total) |
| 0-15 |
GF |
6 |
|
|
| GA |
3 |
|
|
| 16-30 |
GF |
4 |
|
|
| GA |
2 |
|
|
| 31-45 |
GF |
6 |
|
|
| GA |
5 |
|
|
| 46-60 |
GF |
3 |
|
|
| GA |
5 |
|
|
| 61-75 |
GF |
9 |
|
|
| GA |
5 |
|
|
| 76-90 |
GF |
4 |
|
|
| GA |
8 |
|
|
| 1st Half |
GF |
16 |
|
50% |
| GA |
10 |
|
36% |
| 2nd Half |
GF |
16 |
|
50% |
| GA |
18 |
|
64% |
| AVERAGE MINUTES (Total) |
| Avg. minute goals scored |
47 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded |
56 |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (Total) |
| 0-15 |
GF |
11 |
|
|
| GA |
5 |
|
|
| 16-30 |
GF |
10 |
|
|
| GA |
3 |
|
|
| 31-45 |
GF |
11 |
|
|
| GA |
5 |
|
|
| 46-60 |
GF |
12 |
|
|
| GA |
5 |
|
|
| 61-75 |
GF |
10 |
|
|
| GA |
9 |
|
|
| 76-90 |
GF |
8 |
|
|
| GA |
5 |
|
|
| 1st Half |
GF |
32 |
|
52% |
| GA |
13 |
|
41% |
| 2nd Half |
GF |
30 |
|
48% |
| GA |
19 |
|
59% |
| AVERAGE MINUTES (Total) |
| Avg. minute goals scored |
44 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded |
49 |
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
Home
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (Home) |
| 0-15 |
GF |
3 |
|
|
| GA |
1 |
|
|
| 16-30 |
GF |
2 |
|
|
| GA |
0 |
|
|
| 31-45 |
GF |
3 |
|
|
| GA |
3 |
|
|
| 46-60 |
GF |
2 |
|
|
| GA |
2 |
|
|
| 61-75 |
GF |
6 |
|
|
| GA |
2 |
|
|
| 76-90 |
GF |
2 |
|
|
| GA |
4 |
|
|
| 1st Half |
GF |
8 |
|
44% |
| GA |
4 |
|
33% |
| 2nd Half |
GF |
10 |
|
56% |
| GA |
8 |
|
67% |
| AVERAGE MINUTES (Home) |
| Avg. minute goals scored |
50 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded |
60 |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (Away) |
| 0-15 |
GF |
6 |
|
|
| GA |
3 |
|
|
| 16-30 |
GF |
2 |
|
|
| GA |
3 |
|
|
| 31-45 |
GF |
4 |
|
|
| GA |
2 |
|
|
| 46-60 |
GF |
6 |
|
|
| GA |
2 |
|
|
| 61-75 |
GF |
2 |
|
|
| GA |
4 |
|
|
| 76-90 |
GF |
2 |
|
|
| GA |
4 |
|
|
| 1st Half |
GF |
12 |
|
55% |
| GA |
8 |
|
44% |
| 2nd Half |
GF |
10 |
|
45% |
| GA |
10 |
|
56% |
| AVERAGE MINUTES (Away) |
| Avg. minute goals scored |
39 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded |
47 |
Goal Differences by time segment
Goal Differences by time segment (TOTAL)
Pittsburgh Riverhoun Goal Difference (TOTAL)
Charleston Battery Goal Difference (TOTAL)
Goal Differences by time segment (HOME vs AWAY)
Pittsburgh Riverhoun Goal Difference (AT HOME)
Charleston Battery Goal Difference (AWAY)
Leading and Trailing
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
Home
| OPENING GOALS (Home) |
Matches |
| Team scored first |
9 / 15
|
|
60% |
| No goal scored |
1 / 15
|
|
7% |
| Opponent scored first |
5 / 15
|
|
33% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (Home) |
Matches |
| Team was leading at HT |
5 / 15
|
|
33% |
| Team and Opponent level at HT |
9 / 15
|
|
60% |
| Opponent was leading at HT |
1 / 15
|
|
7% |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (Home) |
per match |
| Average minutes leading |
27.7 min. |
|
31% |
| Average minutes level in goals |
53.1 min. |
|
59% |
| Average minutes trailing |
9.2 min. |
|
10% |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (Home) |
| Goals giving the lead |
10 |
| Equalizer goals conceded |
2 |
| Lead-defending rate |
|
|
80% |
| EQUALIZING (Home) |
| Goals giving lead to opponent |
6 |
| Equalizer goals scored |
3 |
| Equalizing rate |
|
|
50% |
| OPENING GOALS (Away) |
Matches |
| Team scored first |
6 / 15
|
|
40% |
| No goal scored |
1 / 15
|
|
7% |
| Opponent scored first |
8 / 15
|
|
53% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (Away) |
Matches |
| Team was leading at HT |
6 / 15
|
|
40% |
| Team and Opponent level at HT |
7 / 15
|
|
47% |
| Opponent was leading at HT |
2 / 15
|
|
13% |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (Away) |
per match |
| Average minutes leading |
31.9 min. |
|
35% |
| Average minutes level in goals |
37.3 min. |
|
41% |
| Average minutes trailing |
20.9 min. |
|
23% |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (Away) |
| Goals giving the lead |
9 |
| Equalizer goals conceded |
2 |
| Lead-defending rate |
|
|
78% |
| EQUALIZING (Away) |
| Goals giving lead to opponent |
8 |
| Equalizer goals scored |
3 |
| Equalizing rate |
|
|
38% |
Results table
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
Charleston Battery
| Home |
Away |
Opponent |
Home |
Away |
| 0:2 |
0:0 |
Louisville City
|
1:2 |
4:1 |
| 1:2 |
2:1 |
Charleston Battery
|
|
|
|
Tulsa Roughnecks
|
|
|
|
|
Sacramento Republic
|
|
1:0 |
| 1:0 |
|
New Mexico United
|
|
1:2 |
| 0:2 |
1:1 |
North Carolina
|
1:0 |
2:1 |
| 1:0 |
1:2 |
Hartford Athletic
|
4:2 |
1:2 |
|
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
|
2:1 |
1:2 |
| 2:2 |
2:1 |
Loudoun United
|
4:1 |
1:1 |
|
|
El Paso Locomotive
|
|
0:2 |
|
2:0 |
San Antonio
|
4:0 |
|
| 0:0 |
|
Phoenix Rising
|
4:1 |
|
| 1:1 |
|
Orange County
|
|
2:2 |
| 2:0 |
0:1 |
Rhode Island
|
2:0 |
1:0 |
| 2:0 |
0:0 |
Detroit City
|
1:1 |
1:3 |
|
1:0 |
Colorado Springs
|
5:0 |
|
|
|
Lexington
|
|
|
| 2:1 |
1:0 |
Indy Eleven
|
2:1 |
1:3 |
| 2:1 |
2:1 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies
|
2:1 |
1:3 |
|
0:2 |
Oakland Roots
|
3:3 |
|
| 1:1 |
3:1 |
Miami FC
|
3:0 |
1:0 |
|
0:3 |
Monterey Bay
|
|
|
| 2:0 |
1:1 |
Birmingham Legion
|
2:1 |
0:0 |
| 1:0 |
|
Las Vegas Lights
|
|
|
Goal statistics
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
Charleston Battery
| Home |
Total |
|
Total |
Away |
| 18 |
32 |
Scored (GF) |
62 |
22 |
| 1.20 |
1.07 |
Avg GF |
2.07 |
1.47 |
| 12 |
28 |
Conceded (GA) |
32 |
18 |
| 0.80 |
0.93 |
Avg GA |
1.07 |
1.20 |
| 2.00 |
2.00 |
Avg GF+GA |
3.13 |
2.67 |
| 93% |
90% |
GF+GA > 0.5 |
97% |
93% |
| 73% |
70% |
GF+GA > 1.5 |
83% |
73% |
| 27% |
33% |
GF+GA > 2.5 |
70% |
60% |
| 7% |
7% |
GF+GA > 3.5 |
37% |
33% |
| 0% |
0% |
GF+GA > 4.5 |
20% |
7% |
| 0% |
0% |
GF+GA > .55 |
7% |
0% |
| 53% |
67% |
GF+GA > 0.5 at HT |
73% |
60% |
| 20% |
17% |
GF+GA > 1.5 at HT |
50% |
40% |
| 7% |
3% |
GF+GA > 2.5 at HT |
23% |
27% |
Teams scoring vs league average
Home scoring averages (per match)
(A) Pittsburgh Riverhoun scored at home
1.20
(B) Charleston Battery conceded away
1.20
(A) (B) average
League Avg home scoring
Away scoring averages (per match)
(A) Pittsburgh Riverhoun conceded at home
0.80
(B) Charleston Battery scored away
1.47
(A) (B) average
League Avg away scoring
Goals scored + conceded per match
(A) Pittsburgh Riverhoun at home
2.00
(B) Charleston Battery away
2.67
(A) (B) average
stats.league_avg_goals_match
Home scoring rate averages
(A) Pittsburgh Riverhoun scoring rate at home
80%
(B) Charleston Battery conceding rate away
87%
(A) (B) average
stats.league_home_scoring_rate
Away scoring rate averages
(A) Pittsburgh Riverhoun conceding rate at home
53%
(B) Charleston Battery scoring rate away
73%
(A) (B) average
stats.league_away_scoring_rate
Over 1.5 goals (scored + conceded)
(A) Pittsburgh Riverhoun over 1.5 at home
73%
(B) Charleston Battery over 1.5 away
73%
(A) (B) average
League Avg over 1.5
Over 2.5 goals (scored + conceded)
(A) Pittsburgh Riverhoun over 2.5 at home
27%
(B) Charleston Battery over 2.5 away
60%
(A) (B) average
League Avg over 2.5
Over 3.5 goals (scored + conceded)
(A) Pittsburgh Riverhoun over 3.5 at home
7%
(B) Charleston Battery over 3.5 away
33%
(A) (B) average
League Avg over 3.5
Both-Teams-Scored (BTS) matches
(A) Pittsburgh Riverhoun BTS matches at home
40%
(B) Charleston Battery BTS matches away
67%
(A) (B) average
stats.league_avg_bts
Home vs Away Stats
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
Charleston Battery
(home matches)
(away matches)
Scorelines
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
Charleston Battery
| HT home |
| 0:0 |
7 |
|
47% |
| 1:0 |
4 |
|
27% |
| 1:1 |
2 |
|
13% |
| 0:1 |
1 |
|
7% |
| 2:1 |
1 |
|
7% |
| HT away |
| 0:0 |
6 |
|
40% |
| 0:1 |
3 |
|
20% |
| 4:0 |
1 |
|
7% |
| 0:2 |
1 |
|
7% |
| 0:3 |
1 |
|
7% |
| 1:1 |
1 |
|
7% |
| 2:1 |
1 |
|
7% |
| 1:2 |
1 |
|
7% |
Home vs Away distribution
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
Charleston Battery
| Home |
Away |
|
Home |
Away |
| 64% |
36% |
% Points |
61% |
39% |
| 56% |
44% |
stats.pct_scored |
65% |
35% |
| 43% |
57% |
stats.pct_conceded |
44% |
56% |
Scoring rates
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
Charleston Battery
| Home |
Total |
|
Total |
Away |
| 80% |
73% |
Scoring Rate |
87% |
73% |
| 47% |
47% |
Scoring Rate 1st-H. |
67% |
53% |
| 60% |
47% |
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. |
70% |
53% |
| 27% |
20% |
Scored in both halves |
50% |
33% |
| 40% |
43% |
Both teams scored |
67% |
67% |
| 53% |
60% |
Conceding Rate |
77% |
87% |
| 27% |
33% |
Conceding Rate 1st-H. |
30% |
27% |
| 40% |
37% |
Conceding Rate 2nd-H. |
53% |
60% |
| 13% |
10% |
Conceded in both halves |
7% |
0% |
Scored + Conceded per match
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
Charleston Battery
| Home |
Total |
|
Total |
Away |
| 7% |
10% |
Total = 0 |
3% |
7% |
| 20% |
20% |
Total = 1 |
13% |
20% |
| 47% |
37% |
Total = 2 |
13% |
13% |
| 20% |
27% |
Total = 3 |
33% |
27% |
| 7% |
7% |
Total = 4 |
17% |
27% |
| 0% |
0% |
Total = 5+ |
20% |
7% |
| 27% |
30% |
Total = 0 or 1 |
17% |
27% |
| 67% |
63% |
Total = 2 or 3 |
47% |
40% |
| 7% |
7% |
Total = 4+ |
37% |
33% |
Goals scored / Goals conceded
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
Charleston Battery
| Home |
Total |
|
Total |
Away |
| 80% |
73% |
GF over 0.5 |
87% |
73% |
| 40% |
30% |
GF over 1.5 |
67% |
53% |
| 0% |
3% |
GF over 2.5 |
33% |
20% |
| 0% |
0% |
GF over 3.5 |
17% |
0% |
| 0% |
0% |
GF over 4.5 |
3% |
0% |
| 53% |
60% |
GA over 0.5 |
77% |
87% |
| 27% |
30% |
GA over 1.5 |
20% |
20% |
| 0% |
3% |
GA over 2.5 |
7% |
7% |
| 0% |
0% |
GA over 3.5 |
3% |
7% |
| 0% |
0% |
GA over 4.5 |
0% |
0% |
No goal scored / conceded
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
Charleston Battery
| Home |
Total |
|
Total |
Away |
| 47% |
40% |
Clean sheets |
23% |
13% |
| 40% |
30% |
Won-to-nil |
20% |
7% |
| 20% |
27% |
Failed to score |
13% |
27% |
| 13% |
17% |
Lost-to-nil |
10% |
20% |
Goal margins
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
Charleston Battery
Trends
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
- Pittsburgh Riverhoun has a high ranking in the Form for the last 8 matches table.
- Pittsburgh Riverhoun's clean sheet rate is at 40%, which is 51% better than the league average of 27%.
- Pittsburgh Riverhoun's average goals conceded per match is at 0.93, which is 31% better than the league average of 1.35.
- Pittsburgh Riverhoun's Points Per Game when conceding first is at 0.45, which is 27% worse than the league average of 0.62.
- Pittsburgh Riverhoun's average goals scored per match is at 1.07, which is 21% worse than the league average of 1.35.
- Pittsburgh Riverhoun's average goals scored after the 75th minute is at 0.13, which is 55% worse than the league average of 0.30.
Charleston Battery
- Charleston Battery has a high ranking in the Points table.
- Charleston Battery is leading the Offence table.
- Charleston Battery has a high ranking in the Offence for the last 8 matches table.
- Charleston Battery's Points Per Game when conceding first is at 1.33, which is 115% better than the league average of 0.62.
- Charleston Battery's average goals scored per match is at 2.07, which is 53% better than the league average of 1.35.
- Charleston Battery's average goals scored in the first 15 minutes is at 0.37, which is 102% better than the league average of 0.18.
- Charleston Battery's clean sheet rate is at 23%, which is 12% worse than the league average of 27%.
Points
|
GP |
Pts |
|
Louisville City
|
30
|
73
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
30
|
62
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
30
|
57
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
30
|
48
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
30
|
48
|
|
North Carolina
|
30
|
45
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
30
|
44
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
30
|
44
|
|
Loudoun United
|
30
|
42
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
30
|
41
|
|
San Antonio
|
30
|
40
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
30
|
40
|
|
Orange County
|
30
|
39
|
|
Rhode Island
|
30
|
38
|
|
Detroit City
|
30
|
37
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
30
|
37
|
|
Lexington
|
30
|
36
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
30
|
35
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
30
|
34
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
30
|
32
|
|
Miami FC
|
30
|
30
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
30
|
29
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
30
|
27
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
30
|
27
|
Form for the last 8 matches
|
GP |
Pts |
|
Louisville City
|
8
|
22
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
8
|
16
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
8
|
15
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
8
|
15
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
8
|
15
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
8
|
15
|
|
Rhode Island
|
8
|
14
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
8
|
13
|
|
North Carolina
|
8
|
12
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
8
|
11
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
8
|
11
|
|
San Antonio
|
8
|
10
|
|
Miami FC
|
8
|
10
|
|
Orange County
|
8
|
10
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
8
|
9
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
8
|
9
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
8
|
8
|
|
Detroit City
|
8
|
8
|
|
Loudoun United
|
8
|
8
|
|
Lexington
|
8
|
8
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
8
|
7
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
8
|
6
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
8
|
5
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
8
|
4
|
at Home
|
GP |
Pts |
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
39
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
38
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
33
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
29
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
28
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
27
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
25
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
25
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
24
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
24
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
24
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
23
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
23
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
23
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
23
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
22
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
22
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
21
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
20
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
19
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
19
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
15
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
15
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
11
|
Away
|
GP |
Pts |
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
34
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
24
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
24
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
23
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
23
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
23
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
21
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
18
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
18
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
18
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
17
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
17
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
16
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
16
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
15
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
15
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
15
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
14
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
14
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
12
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
11
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
10
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
8
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
7
|
Offence
|
GP |
GF |
|
Charleston Batt
|
30
|
62
|
|
Louisville City
|
30
|
56
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
30
|
50
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
30
|
48
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
30
|
48
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
30
|
47
|
|
Loudoun United
|
30
|
45
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
30
|
45
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
30
|
44
|
|
Orange County
|
30
|
44
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
30
|
44
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
30
|
43
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
30
|
42
|
|
North Carolina
|
30
|
40
|
|
San Antonio
|
30
|
39
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
30
|
36
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
30
|
35
|
|
Detroit City
|
30
|
33
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
30
|
32
|
|
Lexington
|
30
|
31
|
|
Miami FC
|
30
|
29
|
|
Rhode Island
|
30
|
29
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
30
|
27
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
30
|
23
|
Defence
|
GP |
GA |
|
Louisville City
|
30
|
19
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
30
|
27
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
30
|
28
|
|
Rhode Island
|
30
|
29
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
30
|
30
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
30
|
32
|
|
Detroit City
|
30
|
35
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
30
|
36
|
|
San Antonio
|
30
|
38
|
|
North Carolina
|
30
|
39
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
30
|
41
|
|
Lexington
|
30
|
42
|
|
Miami FC
|
30
|
44
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
30
|
45
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
30
|
45
|
|
Orange County
|
30
|
45
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
30
|
47
|
|
Loudoun United
|
30
|
48
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
30
|
48
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
30
|
50
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
30
|
50
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
30
|
50
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
30
|
52
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
30
|
52
|
Offence for the last 8 matches
|
GP |
GF |
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
8
|
19
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
8
|
17
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
8
|
17
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
8
|
16
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
8
|
14
|
|
Rhode Island
|
8
|
13
|
|
San Antonio
|
8
|
13
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
8
|
13
|
|
Louisville City
|
8
|
11
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
8
|
11
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
8
|
11
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
8
|
10
|
|
Loudoun United
|
8
|
10
|
|
Orange County
|
8
|
10
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
8
|
10
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
8
|
9
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
8
|
8
|
|
Detroit City
|
8
|
8
|
|
Lexington
|
8
|
8
|
|
Miami FC
|
8
|
7
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
8
|
6
|
|
North Carolina
|
8
|
6
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
8
|
5
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
8
|
4
|
Defence for the last 8 matches
|
GP |
GA |
|
Louisville City
|
8
|
1
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
8
|
5
|
|
Rhode Island
|
8
|
6
|
|
Miami FC
|
8
|
7
|
|
North Carolina
|
8
|
7
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
8
|
7
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
8
|
8
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
8
|
9
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
8
|
9
|
|
Detroit City
|
8
|
10
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
8
|
10
|
|
San Antonio
|
8
|
10
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
8
|
11
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
8
|
11
|
|
Orange County
|
8
|
11
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
8
|
12
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
8
|
13
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
8
|
13
|
|
Lexington
|
8
|
14
|
|
Loudoun United
|
8
|
14
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
8
|
16
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
8
|
16
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
8
|
17
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
8
|
18
|
Offence at Home
|
GP |
GF |
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
40
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
31
|
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
30
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
30
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
29
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
27
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
27
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
26
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
26
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
26
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
24
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
23
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
23
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
21
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
20
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
19
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
18
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
18
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
16
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
15
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
15
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
14
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
13
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
13
|
Defence at Home
|
GP |
GA |
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
8
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
9
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
12
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
12
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
13
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
14
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
14
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
14
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
14
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
16
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
17
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
17
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
19
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
19
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
20
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
21
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
22
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
23
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
23
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
23
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
23
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
23
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
26
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
26
|
Offence Away
|
GP |
GF |
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
29
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
27
|
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
26
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
23
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
22
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
21
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
21
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
21
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
20
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
19
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
19
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
17
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
17
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
16
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
16
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
16
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
15
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
14
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
14
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
14
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
13
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
11
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
9
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
8
|
Defence Away
|
GP |
GA |
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
11
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
14
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
16
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
16
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
18
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
20
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
20
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
21
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
21
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
22
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
22
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
22
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
22
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
23
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
24
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
24
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
25
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
25
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
26
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
26
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
27
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
33
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
33
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
33
|
Season summary
360 matches played / 360100.0%
Total goals: 972
Goals per match: 2.70
First Goal Impact & Lead Retention
Home team scored first:51.4%
Away team scored first:41.4%
Avg minute home team scored first: 30.7 min.
Avg minute away team scored first: 31.5 min.
Points Per Game after scoring first: 2.17
Points Per Game after conceding first: 0.62
Lead-defending rate at home:63.9%
Lead-defending rate away:51.5%
Equalizing rate at home:48.5%
Equalizing rate away:36.1%
Home team lead duration:29.8%
Teams level in goals:49.1%
Away team lead duration:21.1%