Membership Simulator:
Tulsa Roughnecks
2
0
San Antonio
Tulsa Roughnecks
vs
San Antonio
Lead durations (90 minutes of regular time)
Match result analysis
Tulsa Roughnecks after 30 matches
San Antonio after 30 matches
Points Per Game (PPG)
| Home |
2.20 |
|
1.13 |
Away |
| Total |
1.90 |
|
1.33 |
Total |
Team Stats vs League Average
Tulsa Roughnecks (AT HOME)
vs league average
San Antonio (AWAY)
vs league average
Tulsa Roughnecks (TOTAL)
vs league average
San Antonio (TOTAL)
vs league average
Contextual averages
| Tulsa Roughnecks |
AVG |
San Antonio |
| (home matches) |
|
(away matches) |
| Played |
15 |
|
15 |
Played |
|
| Avg Scored |
1.93 |
1.67 |
1.40 |
Avg Conceded |
| Avg Conceded |
0.93 |
1.00 |
1.07 |
Avg Scored |
| Avg Total Goals (GF+GA) |
2.87 |
2.67 |
2.47 |
Avg Total Goals (GF+GA) |
|
| Scoring Rate |
93% |
87% |
80% |
Conceding Rate |
| Conceding Rate |
60% |
53% |
47% |
Scoring Rate |
|
| Clean sheets |
40% |
47% |
53% |
Failed to score |
| Failed to score |
7% |
13% |
20% |
Clean sheets |
|
| Scored in both halves |
40% |
33% |
27% |
Conceded in both halves |
| Conceded in both halves |
13% |
17% |
20% |
Scored in both halves |
|
| Scored first |
60% |
57% |
53% |
Conceded first |
| Conceded first |
40% |
33% |
27% |
Scored first |
|
| Leading at HT |
33% |
37% |
40% |
Losing at HT |
| Losing at HT |
33% |
27% |
20% |
Leading at HT |
|
| AVG minute GF |
56' |
51' |
45' |
AVG minute GA |
| AVG minute GA |
43' |
48' |
53' |
AVG minute GF |
|
| GF+GA > 0.5 |
100% |
90% |
80% |
GF+GA > 0.5 |
| GF+GA > 1.5 |
73% |
67% |
60% |
GF+GA > 1.5 |
| GF+GA > 2.5 |
47% |
43% |
40% |
GF+GA > 2.5 |
| GF+GA > 3.5 |
20% |
23% |
27% |
GF+GA > 3.5 |
| GF+GA > 4.5 |
20% |
20% |
20% |
GF+GA > 4.5 |
| GF+GA > .55 |
13% |
13% |
13% |
GF+GA > .55 |
|
| Both teams scored |
53% |
50% |
47% |
Both teams scored |
|
| GF+GA > 0.5 at HT |
80% |
77% |
73% |
GF+GA > 0.5 at HT |
| GF+GA > 1.5 at HT |
27% |
23% |
20% |
GF+GA > 1.5 at HT |
| GF+GA > 2.5 at HT |
20% |
13% |
7% |
GF+GA > 2.5 at HT |
Comparison with league average
Tulsa Roughnecks (15 home matches) vs league average AT HOME
| (home matches) |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
League |
| points per game |
2.20
|
|
1.59 |
| % Wins |
67%
|
|
44% |
| % Draws |
20%
|
|
26% |
| % Defeats |
13%
|
|
29% |
| Goals scored per game |
1.93
|
|
1.51 |
| Goals conceded per game |
0.93
|
|
1.19 |
| % Clean sheets |
40%
|
|
31% |
| % Failed To Score |
7%
|
|
23% |
| % Won To Nil |
40%
|
|
23% |
| % Lost To Nil |
7%
|
|
15% |
| % Team scored first |
60%
|
|
51% |
| % Opponent scored first |
40%
|
|
41% |
| Average minute scored first |
35
|
|
31 |
| Average minute conceded first |
31
|
|
32 |
| Lead-defending rate |
77%
|
|
64% |
| Equalizing rate |
80%
|
|
49% |
| % Time leading |
35%
|
|
30% |
| % Time level in goals |
44%
|
|
49% |
| % Time trailing |
21%
|
|
21% |
| PPG when scored first |
2.78
|
|
2.33 |
| PPG when conceded first |
1.33
|
|
0.77 |
| Total goals per game |
2.87
|
|
2.70 |
| % over 1.5 goals |
73%
|
|
73% |
| % over 2.5 goals |
47%
|
|
51% |
| % over 3.5 goals |
20%
|
|
29% |
| % both teams scored |
53%
|
|
54% |
San Antonio (15 away matches) vs league average AWAY
| (away matches) |
San Antonio |
League |
| points per game |
1.13
|
|
1.15 |
| % Wins |
27%
|
|
29% |
| % Draws |
33%
|
|
26% |
| % Defeats |
40%
|
|
44% |
| Goals scored per game |
1.07
|
|
1.19 |
| Goals conceded per game |
1.40
|
|
1.51 |
| % Clean sheets |
20%
|
|
23% |
| % Failed To Score |
53%
|
|
31% |
| % Won To Nil |
0%
|
|
15% |
| % Lost To Nil |
33%
|
|
23% |
| % Team scored first |
27%
|
|
41% |
| % Opponent scored first |
53%
|
|
51% |
| Average minute scored first |
14
|
|
32 |
| Average minute conceded first |
24
|
|
31 |
| Lead-defending rate |
44%
|
|
51% |
| Equalizing rate |
40%
|
|
36% |
| % Time leading |
14%
|
|
21% |
| % Time level in goals |
55%
|
|
49% |
| % Time trailing |
31%
|
|
30% |
| PPG when scored first |
2.00
|
|
1.98 |
| PPG when conceded first |
0.75
|
|
0.50 |
| Total goals per game |
2.47
|
|
2.70 |
| % over 1.5 goals |
60%
|
|
73% |
| % over 2.5 goals |
40%
|
|
51% |
| % over 3.5 goals |
27%
|
|
29% |
| % both teams scored |
47%
|
|
54% |
Goal times
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (Total) |
| 0-15 |
GF |
7 |
|
|
| GA |
4 |
|
|
| 16-30 |
GF |
5 |
|
|
| GA |
3 |
|
|
| 31-45 |
GF |
8 |
|
|
| GA |
8 |
|
|
| 46-60 |
GF |
7 |
|
|
| GA |
6 |
|
|
| 61-75 |
GF |
7 |
|
|
| GA |
4 |
|
|
| 76-90 |
GF |
16 |
|
|
| GA |
5 |
|
|
| 1st Half |
GF |
20 |
|
40% |
| GA |
15 |
|
50% |
| 2nd Half |
GF |
30 |
|
60% |
| GA |
15 |
|
50% |
| AVERAGE MINUTES (Total) |
| Avg. minute goals scored |
55 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded |
48 |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (Total) |
| 0-15 |
GF |
5 |
|
|
| GA |
8 |
|
|
| 16-30 |
GF |
7 |
|
|
| GA |
8 |
|
|
| 31-45 |
GF |
4 |
|
|
| GA |
2 |
|
|
| 46-60 |
GF |
7 |
|
|
| GA |
5 |
|
|
| 61-75 |
GF |
7 |
|
|
| GA |
8 |
|
|
| 76-90 |
GF |
9 |
|
|
| GA |
7 |
|
|
| 1st Half |
GF |
16 |
|
41% |
| GA |
18 |
|
47% |
| 2nd Half |
GF |
23 |
|
59% |
| GA |
20 |
|
53% |
| AVERAGE MINUTES (Total) |
| Avg. minute goals scored |
50 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded |
47 |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (Home) |
| 0-15 |
GF |
3 |
|
|
| GA |
3 |
|
|
| 16-30 |
GF |
3 |
|
|
| GA |
0 |
|
|
| 31-45 |
GF |
4 |
|
|
| GA |
7 |
|
|
| 46-60 |
GF |
6 |
|
|
| GA |
0 |
|
|
| 61-75 |
GF |
3 |
|
|
| GA |
2 |
|
|
| 76-90 |
GF |
10 |
|
|
| GA |
2 |
|
|
| 1st Half |
GF |
10 |
|
34% |
| GA |
10 |
|
71% |
| 2nd Half |
GF |
19 |
|
66% |
| GA |
4 |
|
29% |
| AVERAGE MINUTES (Home) |
| Avg. minute goals scored |
56 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded |
43 |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (Away) |
| 0-15 |
GF |
2 |
|
|
| GA |
6 |
|
|
| 16-30 |
GF |
4 |
|
|
| GA |
4 |
|
|
| 31-45 |
GF |
0 |
|
|
| GA |
0 |
|
|
| 46-60 |
GF |
2 |
|
|
| GA |
3 |
|
|
| 61-75 |
GF |
2 |
|
|
| GA |
4 |
|
|
| 76-90 |
GF |
6 |
|
|
| GA |
4 |
|
|
| 1st Half |
GF |
6 |
|
38% |
| GA |
10 |
|
48% |
| 2nd Half |
GF |
10 |
|
63% |
| GA |
11 |
|
52% |
| AVERAGE MINUTES (Away) |
| Avg. minute goals scored |
53 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded |
45 |
Goal Differences by time segment
Goal Differences by time segment (TOTAL)
Tulsa Roughnecks Goal Difference (TOTAL)
San Antonio Goal Difference (TOTAL)
Goal Differences by time segment (HOME vs AWAY)
Tulsa Roughnecks Goal Difference (AT HOME)
San Antonio Goal Difference (AWAY)
Leading and Trailing
| OPENING GOALS (Home) |
Matches |
| Team scored first |
9 / 15
|
|
60% |
| No goal scored |
0 / 15
|
|
0% |
| Opponent scored first |
6 / 15
|
|
40% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (Home) |
Matches |
| Team was leading at HT |
5 / 15
|
|
33% |
| Team and Opponent level at HT |
5 / 15
|
|
33% |
| Opponent was leading at HT |
5 / 15
|
|
33% |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (Home) |
per match |
| Average minutes leading |
31.5 min. |
|
35% |
| Average minutes level in goals |
39.4 min. |
|
44% |
| Average minutes trailing |
19.1 min. |
|
21% |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (Home) |
| Goals giving the lead |
13 |
| Equalizer goals conceded |
3 |
| Lead-defending rate |
|
|
77% |
| EQUALIZING (Home) |
| Goals giving lead to opponent |
10 |
| Equalizer goals scored |
8 |
| Equalizing rate |
|
|
80% |
| OPENING GOALS (Away) |
Matches |
| Team scored first |
4 / 15
|
|
27% |
| No goal scored |
3 / 15
|
|
20% |
| Opponent scored first |
8 / 15
|
|
53% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (Away) |
Matches |
| Team was leading at HT |
3 / 15
|
|
20% |
| Team and Opponent level at HT |
6 / 15
|
|
40% |
| Opponent was leading at HT |
6 / 15
|
|
40% |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (Away) |
per match |
| Average minutes leading |
12.6 min. |
|
14% |
| Average minutes level in goals |
49.7 min. |
|
55% |
| Average minutes trailing |
27.7 min. |
|
31% |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (Away) |
| Goals giving the lead |
9 |
| Equalizer goals conceded |
5 |
| Lead-defending rate |
|
|
44% |
| EQUALIZING (Away) |
| Goals giving lead to opponent |
10 |
| Equalizer goals scored |
4 |
| Equalizing rate |
|
|
40% |
Results table
Tulsa Roughnecks
San Antonio
| Home |
Away |
Opponent |
Home |
Away |
|
1:1 |
Louisville City
|
|
|
|
|
Charleston Battery
|
|
4:0 |
|
Tulsa Roughnecks
|
1:1 |
2:0 |
| 1:0 |
0:1 |
Sacramento Republic
|
1:3 |
0:0 |
| 5:2 |
0:1 |
New Mexico United
|
0:1 |
4:2 |
| 0:1 |
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
|
1:1 |
Hartford Athletic
|
|
|
|
|
Pittsburgh Riverhoun
|
2:0 |
|
| 3:2 |
|
Loudoun United
|
|
2:5 |
| 1:1 |
1:1 |
El Paso Locomotive
|
5:2 |
1:2 |
| 2:0 |
1:1 |
San Antonio
|
|
| 1:1 |
0:1 |
Phoenix Rising
|
1:2 |
1:0 |
| 1:0 |
2:1 |
Orange County
|
3:1 |
1:0 |
|
|
Rhode Island
|
|
0:0 |
|
|
Detroit City
|
|
1:1 |
| 3:0 |
2:0 |
Colorado Springs
|
3:2 |
1:0 |
| 3:0 |
0:2 |
Lexington
|
0:1 |
2:3 |
|
2:1 |
Indy Eleven
|
|
|
| 1:0 |
|
Tampa Bay Rowdies
|
1:0 |
|
| 1:2 |
1:1 |
Oakland Roots
|
1:2 |
1:2 |
|
2:2 |
Miami FC
|
1:2 |
|
| 2:1 |
2:3 |
Monterey Bay
|
1:0 |
0:0 |
| 1:1 |
|
Birmingham Legion
|
0:0 |
|
| 4:3 |
1:4 |
Las Vegas Lights
|
3:0 |
1:1 |
Goal statistics
Tulsa Roughnecks
San Antonio
| Home |
Total |
|
Total |
Away |
| 29 |
50 |
Scored (GF) |
39 |
16 |
| 1.93 |
1.67 |
Avg GF |
1.30 |
1.07 |
| 14 |
30 |
Conceded (GA) |
38 |
21 |
| 0.93 |
1.00 |
Avg GA |
1.27 |
1.40 |
| 2.87 |
2.67 |
Avg GF+GA |
2.57 |
2.47 |
| 100% |
100% |
GF+GA > 0.5 |
87% |
80% |
| 73% |
77% |
GF+GA > 1.5 |
63% |
60% |
| 47% |
40% |
GF+GA > 2.5 |
47% |
40% |
| 20% |
20% |
GF+GA > 3.5 |
27% |
27% |
| 20% |
17% |
GF+GA > 4.5 |
17% |
20% |
| 13% |
7% |
GF+GA > .55 |
10% |
13% |
| 80% |
77% |
GF+GA > 0.5 at HT |
70% |
73% |
| 27% |
20% |
GF+GA > 1.5 at HT |
30% |
20% |
| 20% |
17% |
GF+GA > 2.5 at HT |
7% |
7% |
Teams scoring vs league average
Home scoring averages (per match)
(A) Tulsa Roughnecks scored at home
1.93
(B) San Antonio conceded away
1.40
(A) (B) average
League Avg home scoring
Away scoring averages (per match)
(A) Tulsa Roughnecks conceded at home
0.93
(B) San Antonio scored away
1.07
(A) (B) average
League Avg away scoring
Goals scored + conceded per match
(A) Tulsa Roughnecks at home
2.87
(B) San Antonio away
2.47
(A) (B) average
stats.league_avg_goals_match
Home scoring rate averages
(A) Tulsa Roughnecks scoring rate at home
93%
(B) San Antonio conceding rate away
80%
(A) (B) average
stats.league_home_scoring_rate
Away scoring rate averages
(A) Tulsa Roughnecks conceding rate at home
60%
(B) San Antonio scoring rate away
47%
(A) (B) average
stats.league_away_scoring_rate
Over 1.5 goals (scored + conceded)
(A) Tulsa Roughnecks over 1.5 at home
73%
(B) San Antonio over 1.5 away
60%
(A) (B) average
League Avg over 1.5
Over 2.5 goals (scored + conceded)
(A) Tulsa Roughnecks over 2.5 at home
47%
(B) San Antonio over 2.5 away
40%
(A) (B) average
League Avg over 2.5
Over 3.5 goals (scored + conceded)
(A) Tulsa Roughnecks over 3.5 at home
20%
(B) San Antonio over 3.5 away
27%
(A) (B) average
League Avg over 3.5
Both-Teams-Scored (BTS) matches
(A) Tulsa Roughnecks BTS matches at home
53%
(B) San Antonio BTS matches away
47%
(A) (B) average
stats.league_avg_bts
Home vs Away Stats
Tulsa Roughnecks
San Antonio
(home matches)
(away matches)
Scorelines
Tulsa Roughnecks
San Antonio
| HT home |
| 1:0 |
5 |
|
33% |
| 0:0 |
3 |
|
20% |
| 0:1 |
3 |
|
20% |
| 1:2 |
2 |
|
13% |
| 1:1 |
1 |
|
7% |
| 2:2 |
1 |
|
7% |
| HT away |
| 1:0 |
5 |
|
33% |
| 0:0 |
4 |
|
27% |
| 0:1 |
3 |
|
20% |
| 2:0 |
1 |
|
7% |
| 1:1 |
1 |
|
7% |
| 2:2 |
1 |
|
7% |
Home vs Away distribution
Tulsa Roughnecks
San Antonio
| Home |
Away |
|
Home |
Away |
| 58% |
42% |
% Points |
57% |
43% |
| 58% |
42% |
stats.pct_scored |
59% |
41% |
| 47% |
53% |
stats.pct_conceded |
45% |
55% |
Scoring rates
Tulsa Roughnecks
San Antonio
| Home |
Total |
|
Total |
Away |
| 93% |
93% |
Scoring Rate |
63% |
47% |
| 60% |
53% |
Scoring Rate 1st-H. |
40% |
33% |
| 73% |
70% |
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. |
43% |
33% |
| 40% |
30% |
Scored in both halves |
20% |
20% |
| 53% |
60% |
Both teams scored |
50% |
47% |
| 60% |
67% |
Conceding Rate |
73% |
80% |
| 47% |
40% |
Conceding Rate 1st-H. |
47% |
53% |
| 27% |
40% |
Conceding Rate 2nd-H. |
50% |
53% |
| 13% |
13% |
Conceded in both halves |
23% |
27% |
Scored + Conceded per match
Tulsa Roughnecks
San Antonio
| Home |
Total |
|
Total |
Away |
| 0% |
0% |
Total = 0 |
13% |
20% |
| 27% |
23% |
Total = 1 |
23% |
20% |
| 27% |
37% |
Total = 2 |
17% |
20% |
| 27% |
20% |
Total = 3 |
20% |
13% |
| 0% |
3% |
Total = 4 |
10% |
7% |
| 20% |
17% |
Total = 5+ |
17% |
20% |
| 27% |
23% |
Total = 0 or 1 |
37% |
40% |
| 53% |
57% |
Total = 2 or 3 |
37% |
33% |
| 20% |
20% |
Total = 4+ |
27% |
27% |
Goals scored / Goals conceded
Tulsa Roughnecks
San Antonio
| Home |
Total |
|
Total |
Away |
| 93% |
93% |
GF over 0.5 |
63% |
47% |
| 47% |
37% |
GF over 1.5 |
33% |
33% |
| 33% |
23% |
GF over 2.5 |
20% |
13% |
| 13% |
10% |
GF over 3.5 |
7% |
7% |
| 7% |
3% |
GF over 4.5 |
7% |
7% |
| 60% |
67% |
GA over 0.5 |
73% |
80% |
| 27% |
30% |
GA over 1.5 |
37% |
33% |
| 7% |
3% |
GA over 2.5 |
10% |
13% |
| 0% |
0% |
GA over 3.5 |
7% |
13% |
| 0% |
0% |
GA over 4.5 |
0% |
0% |
No goal scored / conceded
Tulsa Roughnecks
San Antonio
| Home |
Total |
|
Total |
Away |
| 40% |
33% |
Clean sheets |
27% |
20% |
| 40% |
33% |
Won-to-nil |
13% |
0% |
| 7% |
7% |
Failed to score |
37% |
53% |
| 7% |
7% |
Lost-to-nil |
23% |
33% |
Goal margins
Tulsa Roughnecks
San Antonio
Margins (total)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4+ |
| W |
10 | 2 |
4 | 0 |
| L |
4 | 1 |
0 | 0 |
Trends
Tulsa Roughnecks
- Tulsa Roughnecks have been undefeated in their last 4 matches.
- Tulsa Roughnecks have won their last 3 home matches.
- Tulsa Roughnecks have kept a clean sheet in their last 3 home matches.
- Tulsa Roughnecks have been undefeated in their last 11 home matches.
- Tulsa Roughnecks have scored 32% of their goals after the 75th minute.
- 8 consecutive match where Tulsa Roughnecks have scored.
- Tulsa Roughnecks has a high ranking in the Defence for the last 8 matches table.
- Tulsa Roughnecks's equalizing rate is at 74%, which is 76% better than the league average of 42%.
- Tulsa Roughnecks's Points Per Game when conceding first is at 0.92, which is 48% better than the league average of 0.62.
- Tulsa Roughnecks's average goals scored after the 75th minute is at 0.53, which is 79% better than the league average of 0.30.
- Tulsa Roughnecks have conceded the opening goal in 40% of their 15 home matches.
San Antonio
- San Antonio's Points Per Game when conceding first is at 0.80, which is 29% better than the league average of 0.62.
- San Antonio's average goals conceded per match is at 1.27, which is 6% better than the league average of 1.35.
- San Antonio have lost their last 4 away matches.
- San Antonio have failed to score in their last 4 away matches.
- San Antonio's team-scored-first rate is at 37%, which is 21% worse than the league average of 46%.
- San Antonio's team-conceded-first rate is at 50%, which is 8% worse than the league average of 46%.
- San Antonio's average goals conceded in the first 15 minutes is at 0.27, which is 47% worse than the league average of 0.18.
Points
|
GP |
Pts |
|
Louisville City
|
30
|
73
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
30
|
62
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
30
|
57
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
30
|
48
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
30
|
48
|
|
North Carolina
|
30
|
45
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
30
|
44
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
30
|
44
|
|
Loudoun United
|
30
|
42
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
30
|
41
|
|
San Antonio
|
30
|
40
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
30
|
40
|
|
Orange County
|
30
|
39
|
|
Rhode Island
|
30
|
38
|
|
Detroit City
|
30
|
37
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
30
|
37
|
|
Lexington
|
30
|
36
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
30
|
35
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
30
|
34
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
30
|
32
|
|
Miami FC
|
30
|
30
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
30
|
29
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
30
|
27
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
30
|
27
|
Form for the last 8 matches
|
GP |
Pts |
|
Louisville City
|
8
|
22
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
8
|
16
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
8
|
15
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
8
|
15
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
8
|
15
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
8
|
15
|
|
Rhode Island
|
8
|
14
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
8
|
13
|
|
North Carolina
|
8
|
12
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
8
|
11
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
8
|
11
|
|
San Antonio
|
8
|
10
|
|
Miami FC
|
8
|
10
|
|
Orange County
|
8
|
10
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
8
|
9
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
8
|
9
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
8
|
8
|
|
Detroit City
|
8
|
8
|
|
Loudoun United
|
8
|
8
|
|
Lexington
|
8
|
8
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
8
|
7
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
8
|
6
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
8
|
5
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
8
|
4
|
at Home
|
GP |
Pts |
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
39
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
38
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
33
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
29
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
28
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
27
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
25
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
25
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
24
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
24
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
24
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
23
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
23
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
23
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
23
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
22
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
22
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
21
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
20
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
19
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
19
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
15
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
15
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
11
|
Away
|
GP |
Pts |
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
34
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
24
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
24
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
23
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
23
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
23
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
21
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
18
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
18
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
18
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
17
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
17
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
16
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
16
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
15
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
15
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
15
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
14
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
14
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
12
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
11
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
10
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
8
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
7
|
Offence
|
GP |
GF |
|
Charleston Batt
|
30
|
62
|
|
Louisville City
|
30
|
56
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
30
|
50
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
30
|
48
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
30
|
48
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
30
|
47
|
|
Loudoun United
|
30
|
45
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
30
|
45
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
30
|
44
|
|
Orange County
|
30
|
44
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
30
|
44
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
30
|
43
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
30
|
42
|
|
North Carolina
|
30
|
40
|
|
San Antonio
|
30
|
39
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
30
|
36
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
30
|
35
|
|
Detroit City
|
30
|
33
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
30
|
32
|
|
Lexington
|
30
|
31
|
|
Miami FC
|
30
|
29
|
|
Rhode Island
|
30
|
29
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
30
|
27
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
30
|
23
|
Defence
|
GP |
GA |
|
Louisville City
|
30
|
19
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
30
|
27
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
30
|
28
|
|
Rhode Island
|
30
|
29
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
30
|
30
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
30
|
32
|
|
Detroit City
|
30
|
35
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
30
|
36
|
|
San Antonio
|
30
|
38
|
|
North Carolina
|
30
|
39
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
30
|
41
|
|
Lexington
|
30
|
42
|
|
Miami FC
|
30
|
44
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
30
|
45
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
30
|
45
|
|
Orange County
|
30
|
45
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
30
|
47
|
|
Loudoun United
|
30
|
48
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
30
|
48
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
30
|
50
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
30
|
50
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
30
|
50
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
30
|
52
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
30
|
52
|
Offence for the last 8 matches
|
GP |
GF |
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
8
|
19
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
8
|
17
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
8
|
17
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
8
|
16
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
8
|
14
|
|
Rhode Island
|
8
|
13
|
|
San Antonio
|
8
|
13
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
8
|
13
|
|
Louisville City
|
8
|
11
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
8
|
11
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
8
|
11
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
8
|
10
|
|
Loudoun United
|
8
|
10
|
|
Orange County
|
8
|
10
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
8
|
10
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
8
|
9
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
8
|
8
|
|
Detroit City
|
8
|
8
|
|
Lexington
|
8
|
8
|
|
Miami FC
|
8
|
7
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
8
|
6
|
|
North Carolina
|
8
|
6
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
8
|
5
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
8
|
4
|
Defence for the last 8 matches
|
GP |
GA |
|
Louisville City
|
8
|
1
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
8
|
5
|
|
Rhode Island
|
8
|
6
|
|
Miami FC
|
8
|
7
|
|
North Carolina
|
8
|
7
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
8
|
7
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
8
|
8
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
8
|
9
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
8
|
9
|
|
Detroit City
|
8
|
10
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
8
|
10
|
|
San Antonio
|
8
|
10
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
8
|
11
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
8
|
11
|
|
Orange County
|
8
|
11
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
8
|
12
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
8
|
13
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
8
|
13
|
|
Lexington
|
8
|
14
|
|
Loudoun United
|
8
|
14
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
8
|
16
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
8
|
16
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
8
|
17
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
8
|
18
|
Offence at Home
|
GP |
GF |
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
40
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
31
|
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
30
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
30
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
29
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
27
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
27
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
26
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
26
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
26
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
24
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
23
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
23
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
21
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
20
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
19
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
18
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
18
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
16
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
15
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
15
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
14
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
13
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
13
|
Defence at Home
|
GP |
GA |
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
8
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
9
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
12
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
12
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
13
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
14
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
14
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
14
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
14
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
16
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
17
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
17
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
19
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
19
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
20
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
21
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
22
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
23
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
23
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
23
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
23
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
23
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
26
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
26
|
Offence Away
|
GP |
GF |
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
29
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
27
|
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
26
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
23
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
22
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
21
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
21
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
21
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
20
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
19
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
19
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
17
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
17
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
16
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
16
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
16
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
15
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
14
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
14
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
14
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
13
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
11
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
9
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
8
|
Defence Away
|
GP |
GA |
|
Louisville City
|
15
|
11
|
|
Sacramento Repu
|
15
|
14
|
|
Pittsburgh Rive
|
15
|
16
|
|
Tulsa Roughneck
|
15
|
16
|
|
Charleston Batt
|
15
|
18
|
|
North Carolina
|
15
|
20
|
|
Rhode Island
|
15
|
20
|
|
New Mexico Unit
|
15
|
21
|
|
San Antonio
|
15
|
21
|
|
El Paso Locomot
|
15
|
22
|
|
Hartford Athlet
|
15
|
22
|
|
Miami FC
|
15
|
22
|
|
Monterey Bay
|
15
|
22
|
|
Detroit City
|
15
|
23
|
|
Orange County
|
15
|
24
|
|
Tampa Bay Rowdi
|
15
|
24
|
|
Loudoun United
|
15
|
25
|
|
Phoenix Rising
|
15
|
25
|
|
Indy Eleven
|
15
|
26
|
|
Lexington
|
15
|
26
|
|
Birmingham Legi
|
15
|
27
|
|
Colorado Spring
|
15
|
33
|
|
Las Vegas Light
|
15
|
33
|
|
Oakland Roots
|
15
|
33
|
Season summary
360 matches played / 360100.0%
Total goals: 972
Goals per match: 2.70
First Goal Impact & Lead Retention
Home team scored first:51.4%
Away team scored first:41.4%
Avg minute home team scored first: 30.7 min.
Avg minute away team scored first: 31.5 min.
Points Per Game after scoring first: 2.17
Points Per Game after conceding first: 0.62
Lead-defending rate at home:63.9%
Lead-defending rate away:51.5%
Equalizing rate at home:48.5%
Equalizing rate away:36.1%
Home team lead duration:29.8%
Teams level in goals:49.1%
Away team lead duration:21.1%