 |
White City Woodville |
(this season in the league) |
White City W.'s progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 25 Feb | White City W. |
0 - 3
0-1 Hamish Gow (3) 0-2 S. Tantari (5) --------------------------------------- 0-3 Fabian Barbiero (90) |
NE MetroStars | + | - | + | 0-2 | stats |
| 2 Mar | A. Olympic |
1 - 5
0-1 S. Goode (16) 0-2 Yudai Koike (35) --------------------------------------- 0-3 S. Goode (52) 0-4 S. Goode (62) 1-4 L. Overall (71) 1-5 C. Shearer (90) |
White City W. | + | - | - | 0-2 | stats |
| 8 Mar | White City W. |
2 - 3
0-1 D. Pollock (16) 0-2 D. Pollock (44) --------------------------------------- 1-2 S. Goode (59) 2-2 Michael Jakobsen (59) 2-3 J. Rideout (64) |
South Adelaide | + | - | - | 0-2 | stats |
| 22 Mar | Adelaide City |
0 - 1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 J. Konstandopoulos (88) |
White City W. | - | + | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 30 Mar | White City W. |
1 - 0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 L. Stolinski (84) |
Adelaide Comets | - | + | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 6 Apr | White City W. |
0 - 3
0-1 A. Hussein (12) --------------------------------------- 0-2 Omid Musawi (73) 0-3 L. Smith (85) |
Para Hills | + | - | + | 0-1 | stats |
| 20 Apr | Adelaide Raider |
3 - 2
1-0 Katsuyoshi Kimishima (15) pen. 2-0 P. Radice (22) --------------------------------------- 2-1 J. Konstandopoulos (58) pen. 2-2 C. Shearer (80) 3-2 F. Busasa (83) |
White City W. | + | - | - | 2-0 | stats |
| 25 Apr | White City W. |
2 - 2
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Marc Marino (56) 1-1 F. Niyonkuru (70) 1-2 J. Barresi (76) 2-2 J. Clark (90) |
Campbelltown | + | - | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 4 May | Modbury Jets |
2 - 1
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Jesse Francesca (85) 2-0 J. Hernandez (90) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Yudai Koike (98) |
White City W. | + | - | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 11 May | White City W. |
2 - 2
1-0 Y. Koike (22) 1-1 H. Crawford (28) --------------------------------------- 2-1 M. Falco (79) 2-2 L. Jovanovic (90) |
Adelaide Utd | + | - | - | 1-1 | stats |
| 18 May | Croydon Kings |
2 - 3
1-0 L. Klimek (10) --------------------------------------- 2-0 T. Visser (49) 2-1 Michael Jakobsen (74) 2-2 M. Maio (86) 2-3 N. Beric (89) |
White City W. | + | - | - | 1-0 | stats |
| Filter White City Woodville results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 25 May | NE MetroStars | h2h | White City W. | 2.20 | 1.80 | |
| 1 Jun | White City W. | h2h | A. Olympic | 0.83 | 1.33 | |
| 7 Jun | South Adelaide | h2h | White City W. | 0.20 | 1.80 | |
| 15 Jun | White City W. | h2h | Adelaide City | 0.83 | 1.00 | |
| 21 Jun | Adelaide Comets | h2h | White City W. | 1.83 | 1.80 | |
| 28 Jun | Para Hills | h2h | White City W. | 1.17 | 1.80 | |
| 13 Jul | White City W. | h2h | Adelaide Raider | 0.83 | 1.80 | |
| 20 Jul | Campbelltown | h2h | White City W. | 1.60 | 1.80 | |
| 27 Jul | White City W. | h2h | Modbury Jets | 0.83 | 2.20 | |
| 3 Aug | Adelaide Utd | h2h | White City W. | 0.67 | 1.80 | |
| 9 Aug | White City W. | h2h | Croydon Kings | 0.83 | 0.83 | |
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.35 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
Run-in overview | ||||||
|
Of their 11 remaining matches in the Australian NPL South Australia league, White City W. will be playing more matches away (6) than at home (5).
Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, White City W.'s remaining home matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining away matches.
White City W.'s opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 1.43 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that White City Woodville will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 1.28 Points Per Game at home in the league. | ||||||
| View opponents PPG values for all teams | ||||||
| Dates based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
White City W. (11 matches) compared to league average
White City W. at home (6 matches) compared to league average at home
White City W. away (5 matches) compared to league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| White City Woodville goals statistics indicate an average of 1.73 goals scored per game so far this season, which is lower than the average number of 1.80 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in the league. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
White City W. | |
| Leading & trailing stats (total) | (this season in the league) |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 4 / 11 | 36% |
| Opponent scored first | 7 / 11 | 64% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 1 / 11 | 9% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 5 / 11 | 45% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 9.1 min. | 10% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 43.2 min. | 48% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 37.7 min. | 42% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, White City Woodville have been in the lead for an average duration of 9.1 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 37.7 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
White City W. | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | (this season in the league) |
| Matches played | 11 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 6 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 2 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 67% |
| EQUALIZING (total) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 10 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 5 |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 8 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 9 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
White City Woodville have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 67% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 33%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 10 times that White City W.'s opponents have taken the lead, White City W. have managed to score an equalizer on 5 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 50%.
|
White City W. | |
| Leading & trailing stats (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 2 / 6 | 33% |
| Opponent scored first | 4 / 6 | 67% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 0 / 6 | 0% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 3 / 6 | 50% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 3.8 min. | 4% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 42.5 min. | 47% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 43.7 min. | 49% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, White City W. have been in the lead for an average duration of 3.8 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 43.7 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
White City W. | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| Matches played | 6 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 3 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 2 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 33% |
| EQUALIZING (home) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 6 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 3 |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 1 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 5 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, White City W. have taken the lead 3 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 33% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 67%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 6 times that White City W.'s opponents have taken the lead when White City W. were playing at home, White City W. have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 50%.
|
White City W. | |
| Leading & trailing stats (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 2 / 5 | 40% |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 5 | 60% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 1 / 5 | 20% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 2 / 5 | 40% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 15.4 min. | 17% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 44.0 min. | 49% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 30.6 min. | 34% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, White City W. have been in the lead for an average duration of 15.4 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 30.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
White City W. | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| Matches played | 5 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 3 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 0 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 100% |
| EQUALIZING (away) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 4 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 2 |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 7 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 4 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, White City W. have taken the lead 3 times and have conceded an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 100% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 0%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 4 times that White City W.'s opponents have taken the lead when White City W. were playing away, White City W. have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 50%.
Results table
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 7 | 12 | 19 |
| GF per match | 1.17 | 2.40 | 1.73 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 13 | 8 | 21 |
| GA per match | 2.17 | 1.60 | 1.91 |
| GF + GA per match | 3.33 | 4.00 | 3.64 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 83% | 80% | 82% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 83% | 80% | 82% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 50% | 60% | 55% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 17% | 60% | 36% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 20% | 9% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 67% | 60% | 64% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 50% | 40% | 45% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| White City Woodville over 2.5 stats indicate a 82% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is higher than the league average value of 68% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in the league. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 17% | 20% | 18% |
| Won-to-nil | 17% | 20% | 18% |
| Failed to score | 33% | 0% | 18% |
| Lost-to-nil | 33% | 0% | 18% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 67% | 100% | 82% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-Half | 17% | 20% | 18% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-Half | 67% | 100% | 82% |
| Scored in both halves | 17% | 20% | 18% |
| Both teams scored | 50% | 80% | 64% |
| Conceding Rate | 83% | 80% | 82% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 67% | 40% | 55% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 83% | 80% | 82% |
| Conceded in both halves | 67% | 40% | 55% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 67% | 100% | 82% |
| GF over 1.5 | 50% | 60% | 55% |
| GF over 2.5 | 0% | 40% | 18% |
| GF over 3.5 | 0% | 20% | 9% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 20% | 9% |
| GA over 0.5 | 83% | 80% | 82% |
| GA over 1.5 | 83% | 60% | 73% |
| GA over 2.5 | 50% | 20% | 36% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in White City W. matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 17% | 20% | 18% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 33% | 20% | 27% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 33% | 0% | 18% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 17% | 60% | 36% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 17% | 20% | 18% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 33% | 20% | 27% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 50% | 60% | 55% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Away wins | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Home & Away wins | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
|
A majority of White City W.'s wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (3 wins), while 1 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more. A majority of White City W.'s defeats had a one-goal margin (3 defeats), while 2 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more. |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 36% | 64% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | ||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 0.83 | |||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.80 | |||
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | -0.97 | |||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored (GF) | 37% | 63% | ||
| % Goals conceded (GA) | 62% | 38% | ||
| League average (% goals) | 43% | 57% | ||
| Matches played at home have accounted for only 36% of White City W.'s total points and only 37% of the goals they have scored so far this season in the league. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9% |
| Drawing at HT | 3 | 2 | 5 | 45% |
| Losing at HT | 3 | 2 | 5 | 45% |
| Total | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
White City W. |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 3 | 17% | |
| GA | 9 | 43% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 15 | 83% | |
| GA | 12 | 57% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 68 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 51 |
|
White City W. |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 1 | 14% | |
| GA | 6 | 46% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 6 | 86% | |
| GA | 7 | 54% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 66 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 49 |
|
White City W. |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 2 | 18% | |
| GA | 3 | 38% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 9 | 82% | |
| GA | 5 | 62% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 69 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 53 |
White City W. scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This season in the league |
| 82% of White City W.'s matches had over 2.5 goals scored in total. 84% of White City W.'s goals have been scored in the second half. White City W. have scored in each of their last 5 away matches. White City W. have conceded 2 goals or more in each of their last 6 matches. White City W. have conceded 2 goals or more in each of their last 3 home matches. White City W. have scored 44% of their goals after the 75th minute. 33% of White City W.'s conceded goals occurred after the 75th minute. |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsTotal match goals stats
Total match goals stats (last 8 matches)
Total match goals stats (at home)
Total match goals stats (away)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
