| REMOVE ADS - Enjoy an ad-free experience on SoccerSTATS.com and show your support: become a Member! | More info |
| Select teams |
 |
North Carolina Courage W |
(this season in the league) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N. Carolina W's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Results
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 23 Jun | N. Carolina W | h2h | Chicago RS W | 2.67 | 1.83 | |
| 29 Jun | Washington S. W | h2h | N. Carolina W | 2.29 | 0.00 | |
| 7 Jul | N. Carolina W | h2h | R. Louisville W | 2.67 | 1.17 | |
| 26 Aug | Seattle Reign W | h2h | N. Carolina W | 1.33 | 0.00 | |
| 1 Sep | N. Carolina W | h2h | KC Current W | 2.67 | 2.00 | |
| 9 Sep | San Diego W. W | h2h | N. Carolina W | 1.83 | 0.00 | |
| 14 Sep | N. Carolina W | h2h | Bay FC W | 2.67 | 1.00 | |
| 21 Sep | R. Louisville W | h2h | N. Carolina W | 1.33 | 0.00 | |
| 29 Sep | Chicago RS W | h2h | N. Carolina W | 0.86 | 0.00 | |
| 5 Oct | N. Carolina W | h2h | San Diego W. W | 2.67 | 0.50 | |
| 12 Oct | N. Carolina W | h2h | Angel City W | 2.67 | 1.14 | |
| 20 Oct | Bay FC W | h2h | N. Carolina W | 0.86 | 0.00 | |
| 2 Nov | N. Carolina W | h2h | Washington S. W | 2.67 | 2.00 | |
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.40 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
| Dates based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| CURRENT SEQUENCES | Home | Away | Total |
| Consecutive wins | - | - | - |
| Consecutive draws | 1 | - | 1 |
| Consecutive defeats | - | 7 | - |
| No win | 1 | 7 | 3 |
| No draw | - | 7 | - |
| No defeat | 6 | - | 1 |
| 1 goal scored or more | - | - | - |
| 1 goal conceded or more | - | 7 | - |
| No goal scored | 1 | 4 | 3 |
| No goal conceded | 5 | - | 1 |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | - | - | - |
| GF+GA under 2.5 | 5 | 1 | 2 |
| 2 goals scored or more | - | - | - |
Comparison with league average
|
N. Carolina W (13 matches) compared to league average
N. Carolina W at home (6 matches) compared to league average at home
N. Carolina W away (7 matches) compared to league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
N. Carolina W | |
| Leading & trailing stats (total) | (this season in the league) |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 5 / 13 | 38% |
| Opponent scored first | 7 / 13 | 54% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 4 / 13 | 31% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 5 / 13 | 38% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 20.7 min. | 23% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 40.7 min. | 45% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 28.6 min. | 32% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, North Carolina Courage W have been in the lead for an average duration of 20.7 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 28.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
N. Carolina W | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | (this season in the league) |
| Matches played | 13 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 5 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 0 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 100% |
| EQUALIZING (total) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 8 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 1 |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 12% |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 7 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 7 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability
North Carolina Courage W have taken the lead 5 times and have conceded an equalizer on 0 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 100% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 0%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 8 times that N. Carolina W's opponents have taken the lead, N. Carolina W have managed to score an equalizer on 1 instance, translating into an equalizing rate of 12%.
|
N. Carolina W | |
| Leading & trailing stats (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 5 / 6 | 83% |
| Opponent scored first | 0 / 6 | 0% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 4 / 6 | 67% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 0 / 6 | 0% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 44.8 min. | 50% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 45.2 min. | 50% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 0.0 min. | 0% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, N. Carolina W have been in the lead for an average duration of 44.8 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 0.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
N. Carolina W | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| Matches played | 6 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 5 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 0 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 100% |
| EQUALIZING (home) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 0 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 0 |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 5 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 1 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, N. Carolina W have taken the lead 5 times and have conceded an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 100% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 0%).
|
N. Carolina W | |
| Leading & trailing stats (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 0 / 7 | 0% |
| Opponent scored first | 7 / 7 | 100% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 0 / 7 | 0% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 5 / 7 | 71% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 0.0 min. | 0% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 36.9 min. | 41% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 53.1 min. | 59% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, N. Carolina W have been in the lead for an average duration of 0.0 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 53.1 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
N. Carolina W | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| Matches played | 7 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 0 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 0 |
| EQUALIZING (away) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 8 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 1 |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 12% |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 2 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 6 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 8 times that N. Carolina W's opponents have taken the lead when N. Carolina W were playing away, N. Carolina W have managed to score an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away equalizing rate of 12%.
Results table
N. Carolina W stats rank the team in 7th position in the the league table with 16 points, 1 point behind Chicago RS W and 1 point above R. Louisville W. The above table shows N. Carolina W results against each league opponent. The tables below provide additional statistics regarding N. Carolina W's season in the league. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 10 | 3 | 13 |
| GF per match | 1.67 | 0.43 | 1.00 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 1 | 14 | 15 |
| GA per match | 0.17 | 2.00 | 1.15 |
| GF + GA per match | 1.83 | 2.43 | 2.15 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 83% | 100% | 92% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 33% | 57% | 46% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 17% | 57% | 38% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 17% | 14% | 15% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 17% | 14% | 15% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 17% | 0% | 8% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 67% | 71% | 69% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 17% | 29% | 23% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 0% | 29% | 15% |
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 83% | 0% | 38% |
| Won-to-nil | 67% | 0% | 31% |
| Failed to score | 17% | 57% | 38% |
| Lost-to-nil | 0% | 57% | 31% |
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 83% | 43% | 62% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-Half | 67% | 14% | 38% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-Half | 33% | 29% | 31% |
| Scored in both halves | 17% | 0% | 8% |
| Both teams scored | 17% | 43% | 31% |
| Conceding Rate | 17% | 100% | 62% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 0% | 71% | 38% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 17% | 71% | 46% |
| Conceded in both halves | 0% | 43% | 23% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 83% | 43% | 62% |
| GF over 1.5 | 33% | 0% | 15% |
| GF over 2.5 | 17% | 0% | 8% |
| GF over 3.5 | 17% | 0% | 8% |
| GF over 4.5 | 17% | 0% | 8% |
| GA over 0.5 | 17% | 100% | 62% |
| GA over 1.5 | 0% | 57% | 31% |
| GA over 2.5 | 0% | 29% | 15% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 14% | 8% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in N. Carolina W matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 17% | 0% | 8% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 50% | 43% | 46% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 17% | 0% | 8% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 0% | 43% | 23% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 17% | 14% | 15% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 67% | 43% | 54% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 17% | 43% | 31% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 17% | 14% | 15% |
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Away wins | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
|
A majority of N. Carolina W's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (3 wins), while 2 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more. A majority of N. Carolina W's defeats had a one-goal margin (5 defeats), while 2 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more. |
||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 100% | 0% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 2.67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored (GF) | 77% | 23% | ||
| % Goals conceded (GA) | 7% | 93% | ||
| League average (% goals) | 57% | 43% | ||
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 4 | 0 | 4 | 31% |
| Drawing at HT | 2 | 2 | 4 | 31% |
| Losing at HT | 0 | 5 | 5 | 38% |
| Total | 6 | 7 | 13 | |
Goal times
|
N. Carolina W |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 6 | 46% | |
| GA | 8 | 53% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 7 | 54% | |
| GA | 7 | 47% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 52 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 47 |
|
N. Carolina W |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 5 | 50% | |
| GA | 0 | 0% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 5 | 50% | |
| GA | 1 | 100% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 52 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 65 |
|
N. Carolina W |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 1 | 33% | |
| GA | 8 | 57% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 2 | 67% | |
| GA | 6 | 43% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 50 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 46 |
N. Carolina W scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The N. Carolina W score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 1-0 so far (3 times). The N. Carolina W score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-0 so far (3 times). |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This season in the league |
| N. Carolina W have kept a clean sheet in 5 of their 6 home matches. N. Carolina W conceded at least one goal in each of their 7 away matches. 100% of N. Carolina W's points have been earned at home. N. Carolina W have scored 77% of their goals at home. 93% of N. Carolina W's conceded goals were conceded away. N. Carolina W have lost each of their 7 away matches. N. Carolina W have lost their last 7 away matches. N. Carolina W have failed to score in their last 4 away matches. N. Carolina W have kept a clean sheet in their last 5 home matches. N. Carolina W have scored 31% of their goals after the 75th minute. |
|
|
Chicago Red Stars W |
(this season in the league) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago RS W's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Results
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 23 Jun | N. Carolina W | h2h | Chicago RS W | 2.67 | 1.83 | |
| 29 Jun | San Diego W. W | h2h | Chicago RS W | 1.83 | 1.83 | |
| 6 Jul | Chicago RS W | h2h | Houston Dash W | 0.86 | 1.17 | |
| 24 Aug | R. Louisville W | h2h | Chicago RS W | 1.33 | 1.83 | |
| 1 Sep | Angel City W | h2h | Chicago RS W | 0.80 | 1.83 | |
| 8 Sep | Chicago RS W | h2h | Orlando Pride W | 0.86 | 2.00 | |
| 14 Sep | Portland T. W | h2h | Chicago RS W | 2.17 | 1.83 | |
| 22 Sep | Chicago RS W | h2h | San Diego W. W | 0.86 | 0.50 | |
| 29 Sep | Chicago RS W | h2h | N. Carolina W | 0.86 | 0.00 | |
| 5 Oct | Houston Dash W | h2h | Chicago RS W | 0.86 | 1.83 | |
| 12 Oct | Chicago RS W | h2h | Gotham FC W | 0.86 | 1.86 | |
| 20 Oct | Washington S. W | h2h | Chicago RS W | 2.29 | 1.83 | |
| 3 Nov | Chicago RS W | h2h | KC Current W | 0.86 | 2.00 | |
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.50 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
| Dates based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| CURRENT SEQUENCES | Home | Away | Total |
| Consecutive wins | - | - | - |
| Consecutive draws | - | 1 | 1 |
| Consecutive defeats | 2 | - | - |
| No win | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| No draw | 7 | - | - |
| No defeat | - | 1 | 1 |
| 1 goal scored or more | 1 | 6 | 2 |
| 1 goal conceded or more | 7 | 5 | 12 |
| No goal scored | - | - | - |
| No goal conceded | - | - | - |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 1 | 4 | 2 |
| GF+GA under 2.5 | - | - | - |
| 2 goals scored or more | - | 1 | 1 |
Comparison with league average
|
Chicago RS W (13 matches) compared to league average
Chicago RS W at home (7 matches) compared to league average at home
Chicago RS W away (6 matches) compared to league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Chicago RS W | |
| Leading & trailing stats (total) | (this season in the league) |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 5 / 13 | 38% |
| Opponent scored first | 8 / 13 | 62% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 4 / 13 | 31% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 6 / 13 | 46% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 23.8 min. | 26% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 32.8 min. | 36% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 33.5 min. | 37% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Chicago Red Stars W have been in the lead for an average duration of 23.8 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 33.5 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Chicago RS W | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | (this season in the league) |
| Matches played | 13 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 7 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 2 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 71% |
| EQUALIZING (total) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 10 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 4 |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 40% |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 7 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 7 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability
Chicago Red Stars W have taken the lead 7 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 71% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 29%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 10 times that Chicago RS W's opponents have taken the lead, Chicago RS W have managed to score an equalizer on 4 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 40%.
|
Chicago RS W | |
| Leading & trailing stats (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 2 / 7 | 29% |
| Opponent scored first | 5 / 7 | 71% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 2 / 7 | 29% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 5 / 7 | 71% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 15.7 min. | 17% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 28.4 min. | 32% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 45.9 min. | 51% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Chicago RS W have been in the lead for an average duration of 15.7 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 45.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Chicago RS W | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| Matches played | 7 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 3 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 1 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 67% |
| EQUALIZING (home) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 5 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 0 |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 0% |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 5 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 6 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Chicago RS W have taken the lead 3 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 67% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 33%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 5 times that Chicago RS W's opponents have taken the lead when Chicago RS W were playing at home, Chicago RS W have managed to score an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 0%.
|
Chicago RS W | |
| Leading & trailing stats (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 3 / 6 | 50% |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 6 | 50% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 2 / 6 | 33% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 1 / 6 | 17% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 33.2 min. | 37% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 37.8 min. | 42% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 19.0 min. | 21% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Chicago RS W have been in the lead for an average duration of 33.2 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 19.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Chicago RS W | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| Matches played | 6 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 4 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 1 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 75% |
| EQUALIZING (away) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 5 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 4 |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 80% |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 2 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 1 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Chicago RS W have taken the lead 4 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 75% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 25%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 5 times that Chicago RS W's opponents have taken the lead when Chicago RS W were playing away, Chicago RS W have managed to score an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 80%.
Results table
Chicago RS W stats rank the team in 6th position in the the league table with 17 points, 6 points behind Portland T. W and 1 point above N. Carolina W. The above table shows Chicago RS W results against each league opponent. The tables below provide additional statistics regarding Chicago RS W's season in the league. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 8 | 10 | 18 |
| GF per match | 1.14 | 1.67 | 1.38 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 12 | 7 | 19 |
| GA per match | 1.71 | 1.17 | 1.46 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.86 | 2.83 | 2.85 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 71% | 100% | 85% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 57% | 67% | 62% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 29% | 17% | 23% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 14% | 0% | 8% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 14% | 0% | 8% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 100% | 67% | 85% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 43% | 33% | 38% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 0% | 0% | 0% |
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 0% | 17% | 8% |
| Won-to-nil | 0% | 17% | 8% |
| Failed to score | 43% | 0% | 23% |
| Lost-to-nil | 43% | 0% | 23% |
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 57% | 100% | 77% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-Half | 29% | 50% | 38% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-Half | 57% | 83% | 69% |
| Scored in both halves | 29% | 33% | 31% |
| Both teams scored | 57% | 83% | 69% |
| Conceding Rate | 100% | 83% | 92% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 71% | 33% | 54% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 57% | 50% | 54% |
| Conceded in both halves | 29% | 0% | 15% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 57% | 100% | 77% |
| GF over 1.5 | 43% | 67% | 54% |
| GF over 2.5 | 14% | 0% | 8% |
| GF over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 100% | 83% | 92% |
| GA over 1.5 | 43% | 33% | 38% |
| GA over 2.5 | 14% | 0% | 8% |
| GA over 3.5 | 14% | 0% | 8% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Chicago RS W matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 29% | 0% | 15% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 14% | 33% | 23% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 29% | 50% | 38% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 14% | 17% | 15% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 14% | 0% | 8% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 29% | 0% | 15% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 43% | 83% | 62% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 29% | 17% | 23% |
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Away wins | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
|
A majority of Chicago RS W's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (3 wins), while 2 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more. A majority of Chicago RS W's defeats had a one-goal margin (4 defeats), while 2 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more. |
||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 35% | 65% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 0.86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.83 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored (GF) | 44% | 56% | ||
| % Goals conceded (GA) | 63% | 37% | ||
| League average (% goals) | 57% | 43% | ||
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 2 | 2 | 4 | 31% |
| Drawing at HT | 0 | 3 | 3 | 23% |
| Losing at HT | 5 | 1 | 6 | 46% |
| Total | 7 | 6 | 13 | |
Goal times
|
Chicago RS W |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 7 | 39% | |
| GA | 9 | 47% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 11 | 61% | |
| GA | 10 | 53% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 56 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 50 |
|
Chicago RS W |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 3 | 38% | |
| GA | 7 | 58% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 5 | 62% | |
| GA | 5 | 42% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 64 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 48 |
|
Chicago RS W |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 4 | 40% | |
| GA | 2 | 29% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 6 | 60% | |
| GA | 5 | 71% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 49 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 52 |
Chicago RS W scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Chicago RS W score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 0-1 so far (2 times). The Chicago RS W score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-2 so far (2 times). |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This season in the league |
| Chicago RS W failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 12 matches. Chicago RS W conceded at least one goal in each of their 7 home matches. Chicago RS W have failed to score in 3 of their 7 home matches. Chicago RS W have scored in each of their 6 away matches. 65% of Chicago RS W's points have been earned away. 63% of Chicago RS W's conceded goals were conceded at home. Chicago RS W have lost 5 of their 7 home matches. Chicago RS W have scored in each of their last 6 away matches. Chicago RS W failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 7 home matches. Chicago RS W have scored 33% of their goals after the 75th minute. 32% of Chicago RS W's conceded goals occurred after the 75th minute. |
|
More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 89 matches played in the league, a total of 239 goals have been scored (2.69 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including the league results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded. |
| The number of matches included in the regular season may differ depending on the way each league is structured. For most national leagues, the stats above relate to the selected league competition in the regular season, excluding playoff matches. Some leagues include additional rounds of matches, for which dedicated group tables may be featured on this page. When such group tables are displayed on the main league page, the stats above also include the matches related to those tables. |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
