| Home | Away | Total | |
| Played | 15 | 17 | 32 |
| Points Per Game | 1.73 | 1.35 | 1.53 |
| Select Favourite Stats | |||
| View Favourite Stats for all teams | |||
 |
Elva |
(this season in the league) |
Elva's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 7 Mar | FC Tallinn |
1:1
--------------------------------------- 1-0 N.A (66) 1-1 Kevon Evans (70) |
Elva | - | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 12 Mar | Maardu |
0:3
0-1 Karl Johann Haabma (22) 0-2 Kevin Burov (38) --------------------------------------- 0-3 Kristo Pldsaar (88) |
Elva | + | + | - | 0-2 |
|
| 21 Mar | Elva |
3:2
1-0 Jasper Reilson (36) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Fjodor Rodionov (62) 2-1 Kristo Pldsaar (75) 3-1 Kevin Burov (80) 3-2 Artjom Timakov (82) |
Levadia B | + | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 3 Apr | Elva |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Dominic Laaneots (68) |
Viimsi | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| 9 Apr | Tallinna Kalev |
2:1
0-1 Andre Paju (6) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Arseni Gusarov (81) 2-1 Vadim Mihhailov (89) |
Elva | + | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| 19 Apr | Elva |
1:3
1-0 Karl Johann Haabma (22) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Kert Tomingas (48) 1-2 Sten Ove Mihelson (72) 1-3 Artsemi Radomski (85) |
Nomme Utd B | + | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 23 Apr | Flora B |
3:2
1-0 Karl-Tristan Lorenz (18) 1-1 John-Paul Mbuthia (27) 1-2 John-Paul Mbuthia (32) --------------------------------------- 2-2 Jaron Silm (46) 3-2 Kregor Kalvik (88) |
Elva | + | - | - | 1-2 |
|
| 27 Apr | Tartu Welco |
3:3
1-0 Kenlou Laasner (10) 2-0 Erki Mttus (17) 3-0 Mark William Mugra (28) 3-1 Karl Johann Haabma (38) --------------------------------------- 3-2 Kristo Pldsaar (57) 3-3 Kevin Burov (70) |
Elva | + | - | - | 3-1 |
|
| 2 May | Elva |
2:4
0-1 Ibrahim Jabir (13) 0-2 Kaspar Sarapuu (18) 1-2 Andre Paju (19) 1-3 Ibrahim Jabir (31) --------------------------------------- 2-3 John-Paul Mbuthia (82) 2-4 Ibrahim Jabir (86) |
Nomme Kalju B | + | - | - | 1-3 |
|
| 7 May | Elva |
2:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Ron Neltsas (52) 2-0 Ron Neltsas (87) |
FC Tallinn | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| 16 May | Nomme Utd B |
1:0
1-0 Artjom Truuvrt (35) |
Elva | - | - | + | 1-0 |
|
| 24 May | Elva |
3:1
1-0 Jasper Reilson (29) 1-1 Arseni Gusarov (32) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Jacob Kleinsmith (64) 3-1 Kevon Evans (89) |
Tallinna Kalev | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 28 May | Levadia B |
1:3
0-1 Georg Lani (4) 0-2 Veiko Ktt (20) --------------------------------------- 1-2 N.A (59) 1-3 John-Paul Mbuthia (83) |
Elva | + | - | - | 0-2 |
|
| 1 Jun | Elva |
0:2
0-1 Kenlou Laasner (39) pen. --------------------------------------- 0-2 Sten Marten Viira (89) |
Tartu Welco | - | - | + | 0-1 |
|
| 11 Jun | Elva |
4:3
0-1 Maksim Tserezov (11) 0-2 Veiko Ktt (o.g.) (14) 1-2 Ruuben Jaagant (22) 1-3 Manucho (42) --------------------------------------- 2-3 Ron Neltsas (69) 3-3 Dominic Laaneots (73) 4-3 Ron Neltsas (81) |
Maardu | + | - | - | 1-3 |
|
| 18 Jun | Elva |
0:1
0-1 Nevil Krimm (43) |
Viimsi | - | - | + | 0-1 |
|
| 22 Jun | Elva |
0:3
0-1 Andero Kaares (44) --------------------------------------- 0-2 Maksim Kalimullin (51) 0-3 Artjom Jakovenko (59) |
Flora B | + | - | + | 0-1 |
|
| 5 Jul | Nomme Kalju B |
2:2
1-0 Chinemerem Godwin (26) pen. 2-0 Chinemerem Godwin (32) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Jasper Kanter (72) 2-2 Jasper Kanter (90) |
Elva | + | - | - | 2-0 |
|
| 11 Jul | FC Tallinn |
0:3
0-1 Nikita Salamatov (o.g.) (37) 0-2 Rikardo Jagodinskis (45) --------------------------------------- 0-3 John-Paul Mbuthia (63) |
Elva | + | + | - | 0-2 |
|
| 16 Jul | Viimsi |
1:3
0-1 Rasmus Lindme (23) 0-2 Karl Johann Haabma (30) --------------------------------------- 1-2 Oscar Ollik (69) 1-3 John-Paul Mbuthia (90) |
Elva | + | - | - | 0-2 |
|
| 1 Aug | Levadia B |
2:2
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Kevin Burov (47) 1-1 Maksim Gussev (58) 2-1 Aleksander Svedovski (88) 2-2 John-Paul Mbuthia (90) |
Elva | + | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 8 Aug | Elva |
2:1
1-0 John-Paul Mbuthia (17) 2-0 Ruuben Jaagant (38) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Andre Songisepp (87) |
Tartu Welco | + | - | - | 2-0 |
|
| 15 Aug | Tallinna Kalev |
1:0
1-0 Arseni Gusarov (26) |
Elva | - | - | + | 1-0 |
|
| 20 Aug | Elva |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Andre Paju (54) |
Maardu | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| 24 Aug | Elva |
0:0
|
Flora B | - | + | + | 0-0 |
|
| 3 Sep | Nomme Utd B |
0:1
0-1 Kevin Burov (8) |
Elva | - | + | - | 0-1 |
|
| 6 Sep | Elva |
1:0
1-0 Peeter Alev (31) |
Nomme Kalju B | - | + | - | 1-0 |
|
| 10 Sep | Viimsi |
5:0
1-0 N.A (11) 2-0 Nevil Krimm (14) 3-0 N.A (20) --------------------------------------- 4-0 Krister Milk (71) 5-0 N.A (80) |
Elva | + | - | + | 3-0 |
|
| 13 Sep | Flora B |
1:2
0-1 Rasmus Lindme (31) 1-1 Jasper Kanter (o.g.) (43) --------------------------------------- 1-2 Peeter Alev (46) |
Elva | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 19 Sep | Elva |
1:1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Osvald Toome (52) 1-1 Jasper Reilson (82) |
FC Tallinn | - | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 9 Oct | Tartu Welco |
4:0
1-0 Uku Malki (44) --------------------------------------- 2-0 Enrico Veensalu (46) 3-0 Henri Kblik (66) 4-0 Andreas Kiivit (90) |
Elva | + | - | + | 1-0 |
|
| 18 Oct | Nomme Kalju B |
0:0
|
Elva | - | + | + | 0-0 |
|
| Filter Elva results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 25 Oct | Elva vs Levadia B | 1.73 | 1.29 | |||
| 29 Oct | Maardu (pp.) Elva | 1.80 | 1.35 | |||
| 1 Nov | Elva vs Tallinna Kalev | 1.73 | 1.00 | |||
| 8 Nov | Elva vs Nomme Utd B | 1.73 | 0.94 | |||
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.26 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
Run-in overview | ||||||
|
Of their 4 remaining matches in the league, Elva will be playing more matches at home (3) than away (1).
Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, Elva's remaining away matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining home matches.
Elva's opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 1.08 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that Elva will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 1.80 Points Per Game at home in the league. | ||||||
| View opponents PPG values for all teams | ||||||
| Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
Elva (32 matches) vs league average
Elva at home (15 matches) vs league average at home
Elva away (17 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Elva goals statistics indicate an average of 1.47 goals scored per game so far this season, which is lower than the average number of 1.79 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in Estonia - Esiliiga. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Elva | |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 16 / 32 | 50% | |
| Opponent scored first | 14 / 32 | 44% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 11 / 32 | 34% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 11 / 32 | 34% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 26.4 min. | 29% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 41.2 min. | 46% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 22.4 min. | 25% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Elva have been in the lead for an average duration of 26.4 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 22.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Elva | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 32 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 21 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 7 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 67% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 18 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 7 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 39% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 19 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 23 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
Elva have taken the lead 21 times and have conceded an equalizer on 7 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 67% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 33%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 18 times that Elva's opponents have taken the lead, Elva have managed to score an equalizer on 7 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 39%.
|
Elva | |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 8 / 15 | 53% | |
| Opponent scored first | 6 / 15 | 40% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 4 / 15 | 27% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 5 / 15 | 33% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 22.2 min. | 25% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 45.7 min. | 51% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 22.1 min. | 25% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Elva have been in the lead for an average duration of 22.2 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 22.1 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Elva | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 15 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 11 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 3 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 73% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 7 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 2 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 29% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 8 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 11 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Elva have taken the lead 11 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 73% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 27%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 7 times that Elva's opponents have taken the lead when Elva were playing at home, Elva have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 29%.
|
Elva | |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 8 / 17 | 47% | |
| Opponent scored first | 8 / 17 | 47% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 7 / 17 | 41% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 6 / 17 | 35% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 30.1 min. | 33% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 37.2 min. | 41% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 22.7 min. | 25% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Elva have been in the lead for an average duration of 30.1 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 22.7 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Elva | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 17 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 10 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 4 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 60% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 11 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 5 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 45% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 11 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 12 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Elva have taken the lead 10 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 60% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 40%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 11 times that Elva's opponents have taken the lead when Elva were playing away, Elva have managed to score an equalizer on 5 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 45%.
Results table
Elva stats rank the team in 3rd position in the Estonia - Esiliiga table with 49 points, 5 points behind Viimsi and 1 point above Flora B. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 21 | 26 | 47 |
| GF per match | 1.40 | 1.53 | 1.47 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 21 | 27 | 48 |
| GA per match | 1.40 | 1.59 | 1.50 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.80 | 3.12 | 2.97 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 93% | 94% | 94% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 67% | 76% | 72% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 47% | 71% | 59% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 33% | 47% | 41% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 20% | 18% | 19% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 13% | 6% | 9% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 67% | 82% | 75% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 27% | 53% | 41% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 13% | 18% | 16% |
| Elva over 2.5 stats indicate a 59% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is lower than the league average value of 69% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in Estonia - Esiliiga. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 33% | 24% | 28% |
| Won-to-nil | 27% | 18% | 22% |
| Failed to score | 27% | 29% | 28% |
| Lost-to-nil | 20% | 24% | 22% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 73% | 71% | 72% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 47% | 53% | 50% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 53% | 53% | 53% |
| Scored in both halves | 27% | 35% | 31% |
| Both teams scored | 47% | 53% | 50% |
| Conceding Rate | 67% | 76% | 72% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 40% | 47% | 44% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 47% | 47% | 47% |
| Conceded in both halves | 20% | 18% | 19% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 73% | 71% | 72% |
| GF over 1.5 | 40% | 53% | 47% |
| GF over 2.5 | 20% | 29% | 25% |
| GF over 3.5 | 7% | 0% | 3% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 67% | 76% | 72% |
| GA over 1.5 | 40% | 41% | 41% |
| GA over 2.5 | 27% | 24% | 25% |
| GA over 3.5 | 7% | 12% | 9% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 6% | 3% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Elva matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 7% | 6% | 6% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 27% | 18% | 22% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 20% | 6% | 12% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 13% | 24% | 19% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 13% | 29% | 22% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 20% | 18% | 19% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 33% | 24% | 28% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 33% | 29% | 31% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 33% | 47% | 41% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Away wins | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Home & Away defeats | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
|
A majority of Elva's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (8 wins), while 6 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more. A majority of Elva's defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (6 defeats), while 5 of their defeats had a one-goal margin. |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 53% | 47% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | |
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.73 |
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.35 |
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | +0.38 |
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 45% | 55% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 44% | 56% | ||
| League average | 51% | 49% | ||
|
Matches played at home have accounted for 53% of Elva's total points and only 45% of the goals they have scored so far this season in Estonia - Esiliiga. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 4 | 7 | 11 | 34% |
| Drawing at HT | 6 | 4 | 10 | 31% |
| Losing at HT | 5 | 6 | 11 | 34% |
| Total | 15 | 17 | 32 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
Elva |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 10 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 9 | ||
| GA | 10 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 9 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 11 | ||
| GA | 11 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 22 | 47% | |
| GA | 23 | 48% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 25 | 53% | |
| GA | 25 | 52% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 51 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 50 |
|
Elva |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 8 | 38% | |
| GA | 10 | 48% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 13 | 62% | |
| GA | 11 | 52% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 56 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 50 |
|
Elva |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 14 | 54% | |
| GA | 13 | 48% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 12 | 46% | |
| GA | 14 | 52% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 47 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 49 |
Elva scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Elva score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 1-0 so far (3 times).
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| This season in the league |
|
Elva failed to keep a clean sheet in 10 of their 15 home matches. Elva failed to keep a clean sheet in 13 of their 17 away matches. Elva have scored in 12 of their 17 away matches. View comments for all teams |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsMatch total goals stats
Match total goals statsMatch total goals stats (last 8 matches)
Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)Match total goals stats (at home)
Match total goals stats (at home)Match total goals stats (away)
Match total goals stats (away)Example
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
