| Home | Away | Total | |
| Played | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Points Per Game | 3.00 | 1.00 | 1.67 |
| Select Favourite Stats | |||
| View Favourite Stats for all teams | |||
 |
Xelaju |
(this season in the league) |
Seasonal match statistics |
| GP | W | D | L | W D L % | ||
| Home | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Away | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Total | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| PPG (Home): | 3.00 | |
| PPG (Away): | 1.00 | |
| PPG (Total): | 1.67 |
Xelaju's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 25 Jul | San Pedro |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Germn guila (58) |
Xelaju | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 4 Aug | Xelaju |
3:1
1-0 Steven Crdenas (21) --------------------------------------- 2-0 C. Cruz (o.g.) (61) 3-0 Angel Lopez (78) 3-1 Diego Ruiz (86) |
Aurora | + | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 8 Aug | Malacateco |
2:2
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Alessandro Canales (57) 1-1 Kevin Ruiz (73) 1-2 Harim Quezada (89) 2-2 N. Andrade (90) pen. |
Xelaju | + | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 23 Aug | Municipal |
2:0
1-0 Jonathan Franco (24) --------------------------------------- 2-0 C. Archila (80) pen. |
Xelaju | - | - | + | 1-0 |
|
| 31 Aug | Xelaju |
4:1
1-0 R. Alvarez (25) --------------------------------------- 2-0 Yilton Daz (47) 3-0 Yair Jan (68) pen. 4-0 Oscar Mejia (80) 4-1 Julio Cruz (90) |
Mixco | + | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 6 Sep | Marquense |
0:4
0-1 Yair Jan (13) 0-2 Diego Casas (39) 0-3 Yair Jan (44) --------------------------------------- 0-4 Steven Crdenas (80) |
Xelaju | + | + | - | 0-3 |
|
| Filter Xelaju results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 11 Sep | Xelaju vs Coban Imperial | 3.00 | 0.25 | |||
| 13 Sep | Guastatoya vs Xelaju | 2.00 | 1.00 | |||
| 20 Sep | Suchitepequez vs Xelaju | 1.25 | 1.00 | |||
| 24 Sep | Xelaju vs Antigua GFC | 3.00 | 1.50 | |||
| 27 Sep | Xelaju vs Comunicaciones | 3.00 | 0.50 | |||
| 4 Oct | Xelaju vs San Pedro | 3.00 | 0.33 | |||
| 7 Oct | Aurora vs Xelaju | 2.25 | 1.00 | |||
| 11 Oct | Xelaju vs Malacateco | 3.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 14 Oct | Antigua GFC vs Xelaju | 3.00 | 1.00 | |||
| 18 Oct | Xelaju vs Municipal | 3.00 | 2.00 | |||
| 25 Oct | Mixco vs Xelaju | 2.50 | 1.00 | |||
| 1 Nov | Xelaju vs Marquense | 3.00 | 1.80 | |||
| 4 Nov | Coban Imperial vs Xelaju | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| 8 Nov | Xelaju vs Guastatoya | 3.00 | 1.40 | |||
| 15 Nov | Xelaju vs Suchitepequez | 3.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 22 Nov | Comunicaciones vs Xelaju | 1.50 | 1.00 | |||
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.33 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
Run-in overview | ||||||
|
Of their 16 remaining matches in the league, Xelaju will be playing more matches at home (9) than away (7).
Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, Xelaju's remaining away matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining home matches.
Xelaju's opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 0.86 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that Xelaju will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 1.93 Points Per Game at home in the league. | ||||||
| View opponents PPG values for all teams | ||||||
| Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
Xelaju (6 matches) vs league average
Xelaju at home (2 matches) vs league average at home
Xelaju away (4 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Xelaju goals statistics indicate an average of 2.17 goals scored per game so far this season, which is higher than the average number of 1.36 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in Guatemala - Liga Nacional - Apertura. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Xelaju | |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 3 / 6 | 50% | |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 6 | 50% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 3 / 6 | 50% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 1 / 6 | 17% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 35.3 min. | 39% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 35.7 min. | 40% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 19.0 min. | 21% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Xelaju have been in the lead for an average duration of 35.3 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 19.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Xelaju | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 6 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 4 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 1 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 75% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 3 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 1 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 33% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 8 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 3 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
Xelaju have taken the lead 4 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a lead-defending rate of 75% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 25%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 3 times that Xelaju's opponents have taken the lead, Xelaju have managed to score an equalizer on 1 instance, translating into an equalizing rate of 33%.
|
Xelaju | |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 2 / 2 | 100% | |
| Opponent scored first | 0 / 2 | 0% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 2 / 2 | 100% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 0 / 2 | 0% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 67.0 min. | 74% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 23.0 min. | 26% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 0.0 min. | 0% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Xelaju have been in the lead for an average duration of 67.0 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 0.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Xelaju | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 2 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 2 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 0 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 100% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 0 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 0 | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 5 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 2 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Xelaju have taken the lead 2 times and have conceded an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 100% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 0%).
|
Xelaju | |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 1 / 4 | 25% | |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 4 | 75% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 1 / 4 | 25% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 1 / 4 | 25% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 19.5 min. | 22% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 42.0 min. | 47% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 28.5 min. | 32% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Xelaju have been in the lead for an average duration of 19.5 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 28.5 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Xelaju | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 4 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 2 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 1 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 50% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 3 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 1 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 33% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 3 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 1 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Xelaju have taken the lead 2 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 3 times that Xelaju's opponents have taken the lead when Xelaju were playing away, Xelaju have managed to score an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away equalizing rate of 33%.
Results table
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 7 | 6 | 13 |
| GF per match | 3.50 | 1.50 | 2.17 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| GA per match | 1.00 | 1.25 | 1.17 |
| GF + GA per match | 4.50 | 2.75 | 3.33 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 100% | 75% | 83% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 100% | 50% | 67% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 100% | 50% | 67% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 50% | 0% | 17% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 100% | 50% | 67% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 0% | 25% | 17% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 0% | 25% | 17% |
| Xelaju over 2.5 stats indicate a 67% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is higher than the league average value of 45% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in Guatemala - Liga Nacional - Apertura. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 0% | 25% | 17% |
| Won-to-nil | 0% | 25% | 17% |
| Failed to score | 0% | 50% | 33% |
| Lost-to-nil | 0% | 50% | 33% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 100% | 50% | 67% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 100% | 25% | 50% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 100% | 50% | 67% |
| Scored in both halves | 100% | 25% | 50% |
| Both teams scored | 100% | 25% | 50% |
| Conceding Rate | 100% | 75% | 83% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 0% | 25% | 17% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 100% | 75% | 83% |
| Conceded in both halves | 0% | 25% | 17% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 100% | 50% | 67% |
| GF over 1.5 | 100% | 50% | 67% |
| GF over 2.5 | 100% | 25% | 50% |
| GF over 3.5 | 50% | 25% | 33% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 100% | 75% | 83% |
| GA over 1.5 | 0% | 50% | 33% |
| GA over 2.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Xelaju matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 0% | 25% | 17% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 0% | 25% | 17% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 50% | 0% | 17% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 0% | 25% | 17% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 0% | 25% | 17% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 100% | 50% | 67% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Away wins | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Home & Away wins | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
A majority of Xelaju's wins have been obtained with a margin of 2 goals or more (3 wins), while 0 of their wins had a one-goal margin. |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 60% | 40% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | |
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 3.00 |
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.00 |
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | +2.00 |
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 54% | 46% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 29% | 71% | ||
| League average | 65% | 35% | ||
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 2 | 1 | 3 | 50% |
| Drawing at HT | 0 | 2 | 2 | 33% |
| Losing at HT | 0 | 1 | 1 | 17% |
| Total | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
Xelaju |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 5 | 38% | |
| GA | 1 | 14% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 8 | 62% | |
| GA | 6 | 86% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 55 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 69 |
|
Xelaju |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 2 | 29% | |
| GA | 0 | 0% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 5 | 71% | |
| GA | 2 | 100% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 54 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 88 |
|
Xelaju |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 3 | 50% | |
| GA | 1 | 20% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 3 | 50% | |
| GA | 4 | 80% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 56 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 62 |
Xelaju scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| This season in the league |
|
Xelaju have won their last 2 matches. View comments for all teams |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsMatch total goals stats
Match total goals statsMatch total goals stats (last 8 matches)
Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)Match total goals stats (at home)
Match total goals stats (at home)Match total goals stats (away)
Match total goals stats (away)Example
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
