| Home | Away | Total | |
| Played | 11 | 11 | 22 |
| Points Per Game | 0.64 | 0.27 | 0.45 |
| Select Favourite Stats | |||
| View Favourite Stats for all teams | |||
 |
HamKam W |
(this season in the league) |
HamKam W's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 22 Mar | HamKam W |
1 - 1
1-0 N/A (31) --------------------------------------- 1-1 N/A (55) |
Fyllingsdalen W | - | - | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 30 Mar | Arna-Bjornar W |
2 - 0
1-0 Ada Henschien (8) 2-0 Linnea Slen (24) |
HamKam W | - | - | + | 2-0 | stats |
| 12 Apr | HamKam W |
0 - 2
0-1 N/A (16) --------------------------------------- 0-2 Ida Holm Neset (54) |
Viking FK W | - | - | + | 0-1 | stats |
| 20 Apr | KIL/Hemne W |
2 - 1
1-0 N/A (26) 1-1 N/A (36) --------------------------------------- 2-1 N/A (80) |
HamKam W | + | - | - | 1-1 | stats |
| 26 Apr | HamKam W |
0 - 2
0-1 N/A (22) --------------------------------------- 0-2 N/A (63) |
Odd W | - | - | + | 0-1 | stats |
| 4 May | Haugesund W |
0 - 2
0-1 N/A (32) --------------------------------------- 0-2 N/A (79) |
HamKam W | - | + | - | 0-1 | stats |
| 10 May | HamKam W |
0 - 3
0-1 Andrine Mo (26) --------------------------------------- 0-2 Marie Seim (60) 0-3 Karen Vistnes (79) |
Asane W | + | - | + | 0-1 | stats |
| 25 May | Start W |
1 - 0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 N/A (53) |
HamKam W | - | - | + | 0-0 | stats |
| 8 Jun | Molde W |
1 - 0
1-0 N/A (31) |
HamKam W | - | - | + | 1-0 | stats |
| 15 Jun | HamKam W |
0 - 2
0-1 N/A (11) --------------------------------------- 0-2 N/A (75) |
Aalesund W | - | - | + | 0-1 | stats |
| 22 Jun | TIL 2020 W |
4 - 0
1-0 N/A (26) --------------------------------------- 2-0 N/A (59) 3-0 N/A (74) 4-0 N/A (90) |
HamKam W | + | - | + | 1-0 | stats |
| 2 Aug | HamKam W |
3 - 0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 N/A (65) 2-0 N/A (74) 3-0 N/A (90) |
KIL/Hemne W | + | + | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 9 Aug | HamKam W |
1 - 3
0-1 N/A (41) --------------------------------------- 0-2 N/A (59) 0-3 N/A (76) 1-3 N/A (90) |
Molde W | + | - | - | 0-1 | stats |
| 16 Aug | Odd W |
2 - 0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Kjolholdt S. (69) 2-0 Kjolholdt S. (75) |
HamKam W | - | - | + | 0-0 | stats |
| 23 Aug | HamKam W |
1 - 0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Kjolholdt S. (52) |
Start W | - | + | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 31 Aug | Fyllingsdalen W |
3 - 2
1-0 Kjolholdt S. (35) 2-0 Kjolholdt S. (39) 2-1 Kjolholdt S. (45) --------------------------------------- 2-2 Kjolholdt S. (50) 3-2 Kjolholdt S. (87) |
HamKam W | + | - | - | 2-1 | stats |
| 7 Sep | HamKam W |
0 - 1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Kjolholdt S. (75) |
Haugesund W | - | - | + | 0-0 | stats |
| 14 Sep | Aalesund W |
4 - 0
1-0 Casandra Lthcke (24) --------------------------------------- 2-0 Nodland I. (81) 3-0 Sunde K. (85) 4-0 Nodland I. (90) |
HamKam W | + | - | + | 1-0 | stats |
| 20 Sep | HamKam W |
0 - 4
0-1 Halbmayr H. (10) 0-2 Maren Nvdal Mjelde (26) 0-3 Vilde Vedeler (42) --------------------------------------- 0-4 Vilde Vedeler (53) |
Arna-Bjornar W | + | - | + | 0-3 | stats |
| 4 Oct | Viking FK W |
2 - 1
1-0 Lundhaug D. (38) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Hem L. (51) 2-1 Kjolholdt M. (53) |
HamKam W | + | - | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 12 Oct | HamKam W |
1 - 4
0-1 Martinussen S. (3) 0-2 Skall E. (9) 0-3 Birkelund I. (23) --------------------------------------- 1-3 H. Thorhallsson (60) 1-4 Veglo V. (71) |
TIL 2020 W | + | - | - | 0-3 | stats |
| 18 Oct | Asane W |
4 - 0
1-0 Mathilde Sangolt (27) 2-0 M. Jensen (39) --------------------------------------- 3-0 Sangolt M. (56) 4-0 Haaland S. (88) |
HamKam W | + | - | + | 2-0 | stats |
| Filter HamKam W results | ||||||||
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
HamKam W (22 matches) vs league average
HamKam W at home (11 matches) vs league average at home
HamKam W away (11 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HamKam W goals statistics indicate an average of 0.59 goals scored per game so far this season, which is lower than the average number of 1.61 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in Norway - 1. Division Women. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
HamKam W | |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 4 / 22 | 18% | |
| Opponent scored first | 18 / 22 | 82% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 2 / 22 | 9% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 14 / 22 | 64% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 6.6 min. | 7% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 38.1 min. | 42% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 45.3 min. | 50% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, HamKam W have been in the lead for an average duration of 6.6 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 45.3 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
HamKam W | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 22 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 4 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 1 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 75% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 21 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 3 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 14% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 6 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 25 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
HamKam W have taken the lead 4 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a lead-defending rate of 75% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 25%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 21 times that HamKam W's opponents have taken the lead, HamKam W have managed to score an equalizer on 3 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 14%.
|
HamKam W | |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 3 / 11 | 27% | |
| Opponent scored first | 8 / 11 | 73% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 1 / 11 | 9% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 7 / 11 | 64% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 7.9 min. | 9% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 35.2 min. | 39% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 46.9 min. | 52% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, HamKam W have been in the lead for an average duration of 7.9 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 46.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
HamKam W | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 11 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 3 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 1 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 67% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 8 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 0 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 0% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 4 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 13 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, HamKam W have taken the lead 3 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 67% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 33%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 8 times that HamKam W's opponents have taken the lead when HamKam W were playing at home, HamKam W have managed to score an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 0%.
|
HamKam W | |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 1 / 11 | 9% | |
| Opponent scored first | 10 / 11 | 91% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 1 / 11 | 9% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 7 / 11 | 64% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 5.3 min. | 6% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 41.1 min. | 46% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 43.6 min. | 48% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, HamKam W have been in the lead for an average duration of 5.3 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 43.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
HamKam W | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 11 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 1 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 0 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 100% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 13 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 3 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 23% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 2 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 12 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, HamKam W have taken the lead 1 time and have conceded an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 100% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 0%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 13 times that HamKam W's opponents have taken the lead when HamKam W were playing away, HamKam W have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 23%.
Results table
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 7 | 6 | 13 |
| GF per match | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.59 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 22 | 25 | 47 |
| GA per match | 2.00 | 2.27 | 2.14 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.64 | 2.82 | 2.73 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 82% | 82% | 82% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 45% | 55% | 50% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 27% | 36% | 32% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 73% | 82% | 77% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 18% | 36% | 27% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 18% | 9% | 14% |
| HamKam W over 2.5 stats indicate a 50% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is lower than the league average value of 61% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in Norway - 1. Division Women. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 18% | 9% | 14% |
| Won-to-nil | 18% | 9% | 14% |
| Failed to score | 55% | 64% | 59% |
| Lost-to-nil | 55% | 64% | 59% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 45% | 36% | 41% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 9% | 27% | 18% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 36% | 27% | 32% |
| Scored in both halves | 0% | 18% | 9% |
| Both teams scored | 27% | 27% | 27% |
| Conceding Rate | 82% | 91% | 86% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 64% | 73% | 68% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 82% | 73% | 77% |
| Conceded in both halves | 64% | 55% | 59% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 45% | 36% | 41% |
| GF over 1.5 | 9% | 18% | 14% |
| GF over 2.5 | 9% | 0% | 5% |
| GF over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 82% | 91% | 86% |
| GA over 1.5 | 64% | 73% | 68% |
| GA over 2.5 | 36% | 36% | 36% |
| GA over 3.5 | 18% | 27% | 23% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in HamKam W matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 18% | 18% | 18% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 36% | 27% | 32% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 18% | 18% | 18% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 18% | 27% | 23% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 9% | 9% | 9% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 18% | 18% | 18% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 55% | 45% | 50% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 27% | 36% | 32% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Away wins | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| Away defeats | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Home & Away defeats | 6 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
|
A majority of HamKam W's wins have been obtained with a margin of 2 goals or more (2 wins), while 1 of their wins had a one-goal margin. A majority of HamKam W's defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (12 defeats), while 6 of their defeats had a one-goal margin. |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 70% | 30% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | |
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 0.64 |
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 0.27 |
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | +0.37 |
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 54% | 46% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 47% | 53% | ||
| League average | 56% | 44% | ||
|
Matches played at home have accounted for 70% of HamKam W's total points and 54% of the goals they have scored so far this season in Norway - 1. Division Women. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9% |
| Drawing at HT | 3 | 3 | 6 | 27% |
| Losing at HT | 7 | 7 | 14 | 64% |
| Total | 11 | 11 | 22 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
HamKam W |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 10 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 4 | 31% | |
| GA | 22 | 47% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 9 | 69% | |
| GA | 25 | 53% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 58 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 49 |
|
HamKam W |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 1 | 14% | |
| GA | 11 | 50% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 6 | 86% | |
| GA | 11 | 50% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 66 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 43 |
|
HamKam W |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 3 | 50% | |
| GA | 11 | 44% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 3 | 50% | |
| GA | 14 | 56% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 49 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 54 |
HamKam W scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The HamKam W score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 0-2 so far (3 times).
The HamKam W score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 4-0 so far (3 times).
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| This season in the league |
| HamKam W have lost their last 7 matches. HamKam W have failed to win in their last 7 matches. HamKam W failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 7 matches. HamKam W failed to keep a clean sheet in 9 of their 11 home matches. HamKam W have failed to score in 6 of their 11 home matches. HamKam W failed to keep a clean sheet in 10 of their 11 away matches. 70% of HamKam W's points have been earned at home. HamKam W have conceded the opening goal in 18 of their 22 matches. HamKam W were losing at half-time in 14 of their 22 matches. HamKam W have lost 18 of their 22 matches. HamKam W have lost 8 of their 11 home matches. HamKam W have lost 10 of their 11 away matches. HamKam W have lost their last 3 home matches. HamKam W have lost their last 8 away matches. HamKam W have failed to win in their last 8 away matches. HamKam W have conceded 2 goals or more in each of their last 5 matches. HamKam W have conceded 2 goals or more in each of their last 6 away matches. |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsMatch total goals stats
Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)
Match total goals stats (at home)
Match total goals stats (away)
Example
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
