| Select teams |
 |
Sacramento Republic |
(this season in the league) |
Seasonal match statistics |
| GP | W | D | L | ||
| Home | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| Away | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | |
| Total | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
| PPG (Home): | 1.67 | |
| PPG (Away): | 2.50 | |
| Points per game: | 2.14 |
Sacramento R.'s progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 10 Mar | Sacramento R. |
2 - 2
1-0 Trevor Amann (28) 1-1 Seth Casiple (42) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Trevor Amann (77) 2-2 Colin Shutler (90) |
Orange County | + | - | - | 1-1 | stats |
| 16 Mar | Miami FC |
0 - 1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Trevor Amann (59) |
Sacramento R. | - | + | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 23 Mar | Indy Eleven |
1 - 1
0-1 Callum Chapman-Page (o.g.) (31) 1-1 Augustine Williams (34) |
Sacramento R. | - | - | - | 1-1 | stats |
| 31 Mar | Sacramento R. |
1 - 0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Jonathan Ricketts (87) |
Memphis | - | + | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 7 Apr | Colorado S. |
0 - 2
0-1 Trevor Amann (5) 0-2 R. Cicerone (26) |
Sacramento R. | - | + | - | 0-2 | stats |
| 14 Apr | Sacramento R. |
1 - 1
1-0 R. López (33) --------------------------------------- 1-1 P. Seagrist (64) |
FC Tulsa | - | - | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 21 Apr | Orange County |
0 - 2
0-1 Trevor Amann (1) 0-2 A. Sanchez (25) |
Sacramento R. | - | + | - | 0-2 | stats |
| Filter Sacramento Republic results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 28 Apr | Sacramento R. | h2h | Loudoun Utd | 1.67 | 0.33 | |
| 5 May | Phoenix Rising | h2h | Sacramento R. | 1.20 | 2.50 | |
| 11 May | Rhode Island | h2h | Sacramento R. | 0.75 | 2.50 | |
| 26 May | Sacramento R. | h2h | Birmingham L. | 1.67 | 1.40 | |
| 2 Jun | Sacramento R. | h2h | Tampa Bay | 1.67 | 1.67 | |
| 9 Jun | Monterey Bay | h2h | Sacramento R. | 2.33 | 2.50 | |
| 16 Jun | Sacramento R. | h2h | Oakland Roots | 1.67 | 1.00 | |
| 23 Jun | FC Tulsa | h2h | Sacramento R. | 0.50 | 2.50 | |
| 30 Jun | Sacramento R. | h2h | Hartford A. | 1.67 | 1.50 | |
| 4 Jul | Sacramento R. | h2h | Las Vegas L. | 1.67 | 1.00 | |
| 7 Jul | New Mexico | h2h | Sacramento R. | 3.00 | 2.50 | |
| 14 Jul | Sacramento R. | h2h | North Carolina | 1.67 | 0.00 | |
| 21 Jul | Oakland Roots | h2h | Sacramento R. | 1.00 | 2.50 | |
| 27 Jul | Detroit City | h2h | Sacramento R. | 3.00 | 2.50 | |
| 4 Aug | Sacramento R. | h2h | Pittsburgh | 1.67 | 1.00 | |
| 11 Aug | Louisville City | h2h | Sacramento R. | 3.00 | 2.50 | |
| 15 Aug | Sacramento R. | h2h | El Paso | 1.67 | 0.33 | |
| 25 Aug | Sacramento R. | h2h | San Antonio | 1.67 | 1.33 | |
| 7 Sep | Charleston | h2h | Sacramento R. | 3.00 | 2.50 | |
| 15 Sep | Sacramento R. | h2h | Phoenix Rising | 1.67 | 1.33 | |
| 22 Sep | Las Vegas L. | h2h | Sacramento R. | 1.50 | 2.50 | |
| 29 Sep | Sacramento R. | h2h | New Mexico | 1.67 | 1.75 | |
| 6 Oct | San Antonio | h2h | Sacramento R. | 2.00 | 2.50 | |
| 10 Oct | Sacramento R. | h2h | Monterey Bay | 1.67 | 1.75 | |
| 13 Oct | Memphis | h2h | Sacramento R. | 0.75 | 2.50 | |
| 20 Oct | El Paso | h2h | Sacramento R. | 0.25 | 2.50 | |
| 27 Oct | Sacramento R. | h2h | Colorado S. | 1.67 | 0.00 | |
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.36 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
| Dates based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| CURRENT SEQUENCES | Home | Away | Total |
| Consecutive wins | - | 2 | 1 |
| Consecutive draws | 1 | - | - |
| Consecutive defeats | - | - | - |
| No win | 1 | - | - |
| No draw | - | 2 | 1 |
| No defeat | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 1 goal scored or more | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 1 goal conceded or more | 1 | - | - |
| No goal scored | - | - | - |
| No goal conceded | - | 2 | 1 |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | - | - | - |
| GF+GA under 2.5 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 2 goals scored or more | - | 2 | 1 |
Comparison with league average
|
Sacramento R. (7 matches) compared to league average
Sacramento R. at home (3 matches) compared to league average at home
Sacramento R. away (4 matches) compared to league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Sacramento R. | |
| Leading & trailing stats (total) | (this season in the league) |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 7 / 7 | 100% |
| Opponent scored first | 0 / 7 | 0% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 3 / 7 | 43% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 0 / 7 | 0% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 38.4 min. | 43% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 51.6 min. | 57% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 0.0 min. | 0% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Sacramento Republic have been in the lead for an average duration of 38.4 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 0.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Sacramento R. | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | (this season in the league) |
| Matches played | 7 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 8 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 4 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 50% |
| EQUALIZING (total) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 0 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 0 |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 2 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 0 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability
Sacramento Republic have taken the lead 8 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).
|
Sacramento R. | |
| Leading & trailing stats (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 3 / 3 | 100% |
| Opponent scored first | 0 / 3 | 0% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 1 / 3 | 33% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 0 / 3 | 0% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 20.3 min. | 23% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 69.7 min. | 77% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 0.0 min. | 0% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Sacramento R. have been in the lead for an average duration of 20.3 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 0.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Sacramento R. | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| Matches played | 3 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 4 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 3 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 25% |
| EQUALIZING (home) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 0 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 0 |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 0 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 0 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Sacramento R. have taken the lead 4 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 25% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 75%).
|
Sacramento R. | |
| Leading & trailing stats (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 4 / 4 | 100% |
| Opponent scored first | 0 / 4 | 0% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 2 / 4 | 50% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 0 / 4 | 0% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 52.0 min. | 58% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 38.0 min. | 42% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 0.0 min. | 0% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Sacramento R. have been in the lead for an average duration of 52.0 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 0.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Sacramento R. | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| Matches played | 4 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 4 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 1 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 75% |
| EQUALIZING (away) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 0 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 0 |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 2 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 0 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Sacramento R. have taken the lead 4 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 75% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 25%).
The home/away result view table is only displayed for leagues set up to have each team play no more than twice against each opponent (one match at home and one match away) during the season.
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 4 | 6 | 10 |
| GF per match | 1.33 | 1.50 | 1.43 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| GA per match | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.57 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.33 | 1.75 | 2.00 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 67% | 75% | 71% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 33% | 0% | 14% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 33% | 0% | 14% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 67% | 75% | 71% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 33% | 75% | 57% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 0% | 0% | 0% |
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 33% | 75% | 57% |
| Won-to-nil | 33% | 75% | 57% |
| Failed to score | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Lost-to-nil | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-Half | 67% | 75% | 71% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-Half | 67% | 25% | 43% |
| Scored in both halves | 33% | 0% | 14% |
| Both teams scored | 67% | 25% | 43% |
| Conceding Rate | 67% | 25% | 43% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 33% | 25% | 29% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 67% | 0% | 29% |
| Conceded in both halves | 33% | 0% | 14% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF over 1.5 | 33% | 50% | 43% |
| GF over 2.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 67% | 25% | 43% |
| GA over 1.5 | 33% | 0% | 14% |
| GA over 2.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Sacramento R. matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 33% | 25% | 29% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 33% | 75% | 57% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 33% | 0% | 14% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 33% | 25% | 29% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 33% | 75% | 57% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 33% | 0% | 14% |
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Away wins | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sacramento R. have obtained as many one-goal margin wins as wins with a margin of 2 goals or more (2 wins for each). | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 33% | 67% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 2.50 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored (GF) | 40% | 60% | ||
| % Goals conceded (GA) | 75% | 25% | ||
| League average (% goals) | 51% | 49% | ||
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 1 | 2 | 3 | 43% |
| Drawing at HT | 2 | 2 | 4 | 57% |
| Losing at HT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Total | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
Goal times
|
Sacramento R. |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 7 | 70% | |
| GA | 2 | 50% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 3 | 30% | |
| GA | 2 | 50% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 37 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 58 |
|
Sacramento R. |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 2 | 50% | |
| GA | 1 | 33% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 2 | 50% | |
| GA | 2 | 67% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 56 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 65 |
|
Sacramento R. |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 5 | 83% | |
| GA | 1 | 100% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 1 | 17% | |
| GA | 0 | 0% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 24 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 34 |
Sacramento R. scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Sacramento R. score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 0-2 so far (2 times). |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This season in the league |
| Sacramento R. have been undefeated in their last 7 matches. Sacramento R. have scored in each of their last 7 matches. Sacramento R. have been undefeated in their last 4 away matches. |
|
|
FC Tulsa |
(this season in the league) |
Seasonal match statistics |
| GP | W | D | L | ||
| Home | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Away | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| PPG (Home): | 0.50 | |
| PPG (Away): | 1.33 | |
| Points per game: | 1.00 |
FC Tulsa's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 17 Mar | Las Vegas L. |
1 - 3
0-1 Stefan Stojanovic (11) 0-2 Phillip Goodrum (25) --------------------------------------- 0-3 Milo Yosef (56) 1-3 Riki Alba (60) |
FC Tulsa | + | - | - | 0-2 | stats |
| 31 Mar | Orange County |
1 - 0
1-0 Sofiane Djeffal (27) |
FC Tulsa | - | - | + | 1-0 | stats |
| 6 Apr | FC Tulsa |
3 - 3
1-0 Stefan Stojanovic (1) 1-1 R. Cabral (39) pen. 1-2 R. Cabral (42) --------------------------------------- 2-2 E. Laszo (50) 3-2 A. Souahy (57) 3-3 Dariusz Formella (73) pen. |
Phoenix Rising | + | - | - | 1-2 | stats |
| 14 Apr | Sacramento R. |
1 - 1
1-0 R. López (33) --------------------------------------- 1-1 P. Seagrist (64) |
FC Tulsa | - | - | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 20 Apr | FC Tulsa |
1 - 4
0-1 M. Myers (9) 0-2 Juan Torres (31) 1-2 J. Portillo (37) pen. 1-3 Nick Markanich (41) --------------------------------------- 1-4 M. Myers (84) |
Charleston | + | - | - | 1-3 | stats |
| Filter FC Tulsa results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 28 Apr | El Paso | h2h | FC Tulsa | 0.25 | 1.33 | |
| 4 May | Birmingham L. | h2h | FC Tulsa | 3.00 | 1.33 | |
| 12 May | FC Tulsa | h2h | Pittsburgh | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 18 May | Tampa Bay | h2h | FC Tulsa | 1.67 | 1.33 | |
| 25 May | FC Tulsa | h2h | Oakland Roots | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 1 Jun | Loudoun Utd | h2h | FC Tulsa | 2.00 | 1.33 | |
| 9 Jun | FC Tulsa | h2h | San Antonio | 0.50 | 1.33 | |
| 20 Jun | FC Tulsa | h2h | Miami FC | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 23 Jun | FC Tulsa | h2h | Sacramento R. | 0.50 | 2.50 | |
| 5 Jul | Colorado S. | h2h | FC Tulsa | 0.33 | 1.33 | |
| 14 Jul | Monterey Bay | h2h | FC Tulsa | 2.33 | 1.33 | |
| 21 Jul | FC Tulsa | h2h | Memphis | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 27 Jul | FC Tulsa | h2h | Indy Eleven | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 4 Aug | San Antonio | h2h | FC Tulsa | 2.00 | 1.33 | |
| 10 Aug | FC Tulsa | h2h | Orange County | 0.50 | 2.00 | |
| 15 Aug | New Mexico | h2h | FC Tulsa | 3.00 | 1.33 | |
| 18 Aug | Memphis | h2h | FC Tulsa | 0.75 | 1.33 | |
| 24 Aug | Detroit City | h2h | FC Tulsa | 3.00 | 1.33 | |
| 1 Sep | FC Tulsa | h2h | Colorado S. | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 7 Sep | Phoenix Rising | h2h | FC Tulsa | 1.20 | 1.33 | |
| 12 Sep | FC Tulsa | h2h | Las Vegas L. | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 15 Sep | FC Tulsa | h2h | Louisville City | 0.50 | 2.00 | |
| 21 Sep | Rhode Island | h2h | FC Tulsa | 0.75 | 1.33 | |
| 29 Sep | Oakland Roots | h2h | FC Tulsa | 1.00 | 1.33 | |
| 6 Oct | FC Tulsa | h2h | El Paso | 0.50 | 0.33 | |
| 9 Oct | North Carolina | h2h | FC Tulsa | 1.20 | 1.33 | |
| 13 Oct | FC Tulsa | h2h | New Mexico | 0.50 | 1.75 | |
| 19 Oct | FC Tulsa | h2h | Hartford A. | 0.50 | 1.50 | |
| 26 Oct | FC Tulsa | h2h | Monterey Bay | 0.50 | 1.75 | |
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.38 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
| Dates based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| CURRENT SEQUENCES | Home | Away | Total |
| Consecutive wins | - | - | - |
| Consecutive draws | - | 1 | - |
| Consecutive defeats | 1 | - | 1 |
| No win | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| No draw | 1 | - | 1 |
| No defeat | - | 1 | - |
| 1 goal scored or more | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1 goal conceded or more | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| No goal scored | - | - | - |
| No goal conceded | - | - | - |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 2 | - | 1 |
| GF+GA under 2.5 | - | 2 | - |
| 2 goals scored or more | - | - | - |
Comparison with league average
|
FC Tulsa (5 matches) compared to league average
FC Tulsa at home (2 matches) compared to league average at home
FC Tulsa away (3 matches) compared to league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
FC Tulsa | |
| Leading & trailing stats (total) | (this season in the league) |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 2 / 5 | 40% |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 5 | 60% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 1 / 5 | 20% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 4 / 5 | 80% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 26.6 min. | 30% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 26.8 min. | 30% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 36.6 min. | 41% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, FC Tulsa have been in the lead for an average duration of 26.6 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 36.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
FC Tulsa | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | (this season in the league) |
| Matches played | 5 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 3 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 2 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 33% |
| EQUALIZING (total) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 4 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 2 |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 3 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 4 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability
FC Tulsa have taken the lead 3 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 33% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 67%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 4 times that FC Tulsa's opponents have taken the lead, FC Tulsa have managed to score an equalizer on 2 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 50%.
|
FC Tulsa | |
| Leading & trailing stats (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 1 / 2 | 50% |
| Opponent scored first | 1 / 2 | 50% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 0 / 2 | 0% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 2 / 2 | 100% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 27.0 min. | 30% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 18.5 min. | 21% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 44.5 min. | 49% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, FC Tulsa have been in the lead for an average duration of 27.0 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 44.5 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
FC Tulsa | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| Matches played | 2 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 2 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 2 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 0% |
| EQUALIZING (home) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 2 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 1 |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 1 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 3 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, FC Tulsa have taken the lead 2 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 0% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 100%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 2 times that FC Tulsa's opponents have taken the lead when FC Tulsa were playing at home, FC Tulsa have managed to score an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a home equalizing rate of 50%.
|
FC Tulsa | |
| Leading & trailing stats (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 1 / 3 | 33% |
| Opponent scored first | 2 / 3 | 67% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 1 / 3 | 33% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 2 / 3 | 67% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 26.3 min. | 29% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 32.3 min. | 36% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 31.3 min. | 35% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, FC Tulsa have been in the lead for an average duration of 26.3 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 31.3 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
FC Tulsa | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| Matches played | 3 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 1 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 0 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 100% |
| EQUALIZING (away) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 2 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 1 |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 2 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 1 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, FC Tulsa have taken the lead 1 time and have conceded an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 100% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 0%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 2 times that FC Tulsa's opponents have taken the lead when FC Tulsa were playing away, FC Tulsa have managed to score an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away equalizing rate of 50%.
The home/away result view table is only displayed for leagues set up to have each team play no more than twice against each opponent (one match at home and one match away) during the season.
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| GF per match | 2.00 | 1.33 | 1.60 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 7 | 3 | 10 |
| GA per match | 3.50 | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| GF + GA per match | 5.50 | 2.33 | 3.60 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 100% | 67% | 80% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 100% | 33% | 60% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 100% | 33% | 60% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 100% | 0% | 40% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 50% | 0% | 20% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 100% | 33% | 60% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 100% | 0% | 40% |
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Won-to-nil | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Failed to score | 0% | 33% | 20% |
| Lost-to-nil | 0% | 33% | 20% |
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 100% | 67% | 80% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-Half | 100% | 33% | 60% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-Half | 50% | 67% | 60% |
| Scored in both halves | 50% | 33% | 40% |
| Both teams scored | 100% | 67% | 80% |
| Conceding Rate | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 100% | 67% | 80% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 100% | 33% | 60% |
| Conceded in both halves | 100% | 0% | 40% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 100% | 67% | 80% |
| GF over 1.5 | 50% | 33% | 40% |
| GF over 2.5 | 50% | 33% | 40% |
| GF over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GA over 1.5 | 100% | 0% | 40% |
| GA over 2.5 | 100% | 0% | 40% |
| GA over 3.5 | 50% | 0% | 20% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in FC Tulsa matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 0% | 33% | 20% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 0% | 33% | 20% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 0% | 33% | 20% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 100% | 0% | 40% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 0% | 33% | 20% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 0% | 33% | 20% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 100% | 33% | 60% |
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Away wins | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 20% | 80% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 0.50 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored (GF) | 50% | 50% | ||
| % Goals conceded (GA) | 70% | 30% | ||
| League average (% goals) | 51% | 49% | ||
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 0 | 1 | 1 | 20% |
| Drawing at HT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Losing at HT | 2 | 2 | 4 | 80% |
| Total | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Goal times
|
FC Tulsa |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 4 | 50% | |
| GA | 7 | 70% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 4 | 50% | |
| GA | 3 | 30% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 38 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 44 |
|
FC Tulsa |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 2 | 50% | |
| GA | 5 | 71% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 2 | 50% | |
| GA | 2 | 29% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 36 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 46 |
|
FC Tulsa |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 2 | 50% | |
| GA | 2 | 67% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 2 | 50% | |
| GA | 1 | 33% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 39 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 40 |
FC Tulsa scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This season in the league |
| (no featured indicator for the team so far) |
|
More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 78 matches played in the league, a total of 214 goals have been scored (2.74 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including the league results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded. |
| The number of matches included in the regular season may differ depending on the way each league is structured. For most national leagues, the stats above relate to the selected league competition in the regular season, excluding playoff matches. Some leagues include additional rounds of matches, for which dedicated group tables may be featured on this page. When such group tables are displayed on the main league page, the stats above also include the matches related to those tables. |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
