Visual table |
Seasonal streaksOutcome Surprise-LevelMore information on the calculation of the Outcome surprise-level is outlined in the following blog article: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Omiya Ardija |
(regular season) |
Seasonal match statistics |
| GP | W | D | L | ||
| Home | 19 | 15 | 2 | 2 | |
| Away | 19 | 10 | 8 | 1 | |
| Total | 38 | 25 | 10 | 3 |
Omiya Ardija's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Results
Comparison with league average
|
Omiya Ardija (38 matches) compared to league average
Omiya Ardija at home (19 matches) compared to league average at home
Omiya Ardija away (19 matches) compared to league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
| |
| Leading & trailing stats (total) | (regular season) |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 29 / 38 | 76% | |
| Opponent scored first | 6 / 38 | 16% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at half-time | 20 / 38 | 53% | |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 5 / 38 | 13% | |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 36.4 min. | 40% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 46.1 min. | 51% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 7.5 min. | 8% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Omiya Ardija have been in the lead for an average duration of 36.4 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 7.5 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (total) | (regular season) |
| Matches played | 38 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 37 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 12 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 68% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 7 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 4 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 57% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 31 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 13 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability
Omiya Ardija have taken the lead 37 times and have conceded an equalizer on 12 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 68% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 32%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 7 times that Omiya Ardija's opponents have taken the lead, Omiya Ardija have managed to score an equalizer on 4 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 57%.
|
| |
| Leading & trailing stats (home) | (regular season) |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 15 / 19 | 79% | |
| Opponent scored first | 4 / 19 | 21% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at half-time | 10 / 19 | 53% | |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 3 / 19 | 16% | |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 39.3 min. | 44% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 42.8 min. | 48% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 7.9 min. | 9% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Omiya Ardija have been in the lead for an average duration of 39.3 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 7.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (home) | (regular season) |
| Matches played | 19 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 21 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 6 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 71% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 4 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 2 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 21 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 8 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Omiya Ardija have taken the lead 21 times and have conceded an equalizer on 6 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 71% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 29%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 4 times that Omiya Ardija's opponents have taken the lead when Omiya Ardija were playing at home, Omiya Ardija have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 50%.
|
| |
| Leading & trailing stats (away) | (regular season) |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 14 / 19 | 74% | |
| Opponent scored first | 2 / 19 | 11% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at half-time | 10 / 19 | 53% | |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 2 / 19 | 11% | |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 33.5 min. | 37% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 49.4 min. | 55% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 7.1 min. | 8% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Omiya Ardija have been in the lead for an average duration of 33.5 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 7.1 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (away) | (regular season) |
| Matches played | 19 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 16 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 6 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 62% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 3 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 2 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 67% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 10 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 5 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Omiya Ardija have taken the lead 16 times and have conceded an equalizer on 6 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 62% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 38%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 3 times that Omiya Ardija's opponents have taken the lead when Omiya Ardija were playing away, Omiya Ardija have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 67%.
Results table
Omiya Ardija stats rank the team in 1st position in the the league table with 85 points, 12 points above FC Imabari. The above table shows Omiya Ardija results against each league opponent. The tables below provide additional statistics regarding Omiya Ardija's season in the league. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 44 | 28 | 72 |
| GF per match | 2.32 | 1.47 | 1.89 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 18 | 14 | 32 |
| GA per match | 0.95 | 0.74 | 0.84 |
| GF + GA per match | 3.26 | 2.21 | 2.74 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 100% | 84% | 92% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 84% | 68% | 76% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 53% | 37% | 45% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 37% | 21% | 29% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 32% | 11% | 21% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 5% | 0% | 3% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 74% | 63% | 68% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 26% | 21% | 24% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 16% | 5% | 11% |
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 42% | 47% | 45% |
| Won-to-nil | 42% | 32% | 37% |
| Failed to score | 5% | 16% | 11% |
| Lost-to-nil | 5% | 0% | 3% |
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 95% | 84% | 89% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-Half | 58% | 58% | 58% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-Half | 79% | 58% | 68% |
| Scored in both halves | 42% | 32% | 37% |
| Both teams scored | 53% | 53% | 53% |
| Conceding Rate | 58% | 53% | 55% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 32% | 11% | 21% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 37% | 47% | 42% |
| Conceded in both halves | 11% | 5% | 8% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 95% | 84% | 89% |
| GF over 1.5 | 63% | 42% | 53% |
| GF over 2.5 | 47% | 16% | 32% |
| GF over 3.5 | 21% | 5% | 13% |
| GF over 4.5 | 5% | 0% | 3% |
| GA over 0.5 | 58% | 53% | 55% |
| GA over 1.5 | 26% | 16% | 21% |
| GA over 2.5 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| GA over 3.5 | 5% | 0% | 3% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Omiya Ardija matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 0% | 16% | 8% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 16% | 16% | 16% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 32% | 32% | 32% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 16% | 16% | 16% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 5% | 11% | 8% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 32% | 11% | 21% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 16% | 32% | 24% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 47% | 47% | 47% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 37% | 21% | 29% |
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 6 | 4 | 5 | 0 |
| Away wins | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 12 | 6 | 7 | 0 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
|
A majority of Omiya Ardija's wins have been obtained with a margin of 2 goals or more (13 wins), while 12 of their wins had a one-goal margin. A majority of Omiya Ardija's defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (2 defeats), while 1 of their defeats had a one-goal margin. |
||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 55% | 45% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 2.47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 2.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored (GF) | 61% | 39% | ||
| % Goals conceded (GA) | 56% | 44% | ||
| League average (% goals) | 54% | 46% | ||
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 10 | 10 | 20 | 53% |
| Drawing at HT | 6 | 7 | 13 | 34% |
| Losing at HT | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13% |
| Total | 19 | 19 | 38 | |
Goal times
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 9 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 11 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 10 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 16 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 20 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 30 | 42% | |
| GA | 11 | 34% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 42 | 58% | |
| GA | 21 | 66% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 53 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 55 |
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 10 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 12 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 17 | 39% | |
| GA | 7 | 39% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 27 | 61% | |
| GA | 11 | 61% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 54 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 54 |
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 13 | 46% | |
| GA | 4 | 29% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 15 | 54% | |
| GA | 10 | 71% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 52 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 56 |
Omiya Ardija scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Omiya Ardija score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-1 so far (4 times). |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Nagano Parceiro |
(regular season) |
Seasonal match statistics |
| GP | W | D | L | ||
| Home | 19 | 6 | 6 | 7 | |
| Away | 19 | 1 | 10 | 8 | |
| Total | 38 | 7 | 16 | 15 |
Nagano Parceiro's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Results
Comparison with league average
|
Nagano Parceiro (38 matches) compared to league average
Nagano Parceiro at home (19 matches) compared to league average at home
Nagano Parceiro away (19 matches) compared to league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
| |
| Leading & trailing stats (total) | (regular season) |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 12 / 38 | 32% | |
| Opponent scored first | 23 / 38 | 61% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at half-time | 9 / 38 | 24% | |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 11 / 38 | 29% | |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 16.1 min. | 18% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 47.0 min. | 52% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 26.9 min. | 30% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Nagano Parceiro have been in the lead for an average duration of 16.1 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 26.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (total) | (regular season) |
| Matches played | 38 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 18 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 11 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 39% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 28 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 13 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 46% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 13 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 18 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability
Nagano Parceiro have taken the lead 18 times and have conceded an equalizer on 11 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 39% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 61%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 28 times that Nagano Parceiro's opponents have taken the lead, Nagano Parceiro have managed to score an equalizer on 13 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 46%.
|
| |
| Leading & trailing stats (home) | (regular season) |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 7 / 19 | 37% | |
| Opponent scored first | 10 / 19 | 53% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at half-time | 5 / 19 | 26% | |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 5 / 19 | 26% | |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 20.7 min. | 23% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 48.8 min. | 54% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 20.5 min. | 23% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Nagano Parceiro have been in the lead for an average duration of 20.7 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 20.5 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (home) | (regular season) |
| Matches played | 19 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 12 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 6 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 50% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 12 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 5 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 42% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 7 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 6 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Nagano Parceiro have taken the lead 12 times and have conceded an equalizer on 6 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 12 times that Nagano Parceiro's opponents have taken the lead when Nagano Parceiro were playing at home, Nagano Parceiro have managed to score an equalizer on 5 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 42%.
|
| |
| Leading & trailing stats (away) | (regular season) |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 5 / 19 | 26% | |
| Opponent scored first | 13 / 19 | 68% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at half-time | 4 / 19 | 21% | |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 6 / 19 | 32% | |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 11.5 min. | 13% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 45.2 min. | 50% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 33.3 min. | 37% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Nagano Parceiro have been in the lead for an average duration of 11.5 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 33.3 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (away) | (regular season) |
| Matches played | 19 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 6 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 5 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 17% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 16 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 8 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 6 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 12 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Nagano Parceiro have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 5 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 17% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 83%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 16 times that Nagano Parceiro's opponents have taken the lead when Nagano Parceiro were playing away, Nagano Parceiro have managed to score an equalizer on 8 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 50%.
Results table
Nagano Parceiro stats rank the team in 18th position in the the league table with 37 points, 2 points behind Nara Club and 5 points above YSCC. The above table shows Nagano Parceiro results against each league opponent. The tables below provide additional statistics regarding Nagano Parceiro's season in the league. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 24 | 20 | 44 |
| GF per match | 1.26 | 1.05 | 1.16 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 24 | 33 | 57 |
| GA per match | 1.26 | 1.74 | 1.50 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.53 | 2.79 | 2.66 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 89% | 95% | 92% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 84% | 89% | 87% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 42% | 37% | 39% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 26% | 21% | 24% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 11% | 21% | 16% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 11% | 5% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 63% | 68% | 66% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 37% | 26% | 32% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 5% | 11% | 8% |
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 16% | 11% | 13% |
| Won-to-nil | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| Failed to score | 37% | 21% | 29% |
| Lost-to-nil | 26% | 16% | 21% |
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 63% | 79% | 71% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-Half | 37% | 37% | 37% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-Half | 42% | 47% | 45% |
| Scored in both halves | 16% | 5% | 11% |
| Both teams scored | 58% | 74% | 66% |
| Conceding Rate | 84% | 89% | 87% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 42% | 47% | 45% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 53% | 74% | 63% |
| Conceded in both halves | 11% | 32% | 21% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 63% | 79% | 71% |
| GF over 1.5 | 37% | 16% | 26% |
| GF over 2.5 | 21% | 11% | 16% |
| GF over 3.5 | 5% | 0% | 3% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 84% | 89% | 87% |
| GA over 1.5 | 37% | 47% | 42% |
| GA over 2.5 | 5% | 26% | 16% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 11% | 5% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Nagano Parceiro matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 11% | 5% | 8% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 42% | 53% | 47% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 16% | 16% | 16% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 16% | 0% | 8% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 11% | 21% | 16% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 16% | 11% | 13% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 58% | 68% | 63% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 26% | 21% | 24% |
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Away wins | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 7 | 6 | 2 | 0 |
|
A majority of Nagano Parceiro's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (4 wins), while 3 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more. A majority of Nagano Parceiro's defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (8 defeats), while 7 of their defeats had a one-goal margin. |
||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 65% | 35% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 0.68 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored (GF) | 55% | 45% | ||
| % Goals conceded (GA) | 42% | 58% | ||
| League average (% goals) | 54% | 46% | ||
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 5 | 4 | 9 | 24% |
| Drawing at HT | 9 | 9 | 18 | 47% |
| Losing at HT | 5 | 6 | 11 | 29% |
| Total | 19 | 19 | 38 | |
Goal times
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 10 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 13 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 13 | ||
| GA | 11 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 18 | 41% | |
| GA | 24 | 42% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 26 | 59% | |
| GA | 33 | 58% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 53 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 51 |
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 10 | 42% | |
| GA | 11 | 46% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 14 | 58% | |
| GA | 13 | 54% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 50 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 49 |
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 8 | 40% | |
| GA | 13 | 39% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 12 | 60% | |
| GA | 20 | 61% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 56 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 52 |
Nagano Parceiro scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Nagano Parceiro score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-1 so far (8 times). |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tables overview | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||