Visual table |
Seasonal streaks | |||||||||||||||||
 |
Giravanz Kitakyushu |
(regular season) |
Seasonal match statistics |
| GP | W | D | L | ||
| Home | 19 | 8 | 4 | 7 | |
| Away | 19 | 9 | 1 | 9 | |
| Total | 38 | 17 | 5 | 16 |
G. Kitakyushu's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Results
Comparison with league average
|
G. Kitakyushu (38 matches) vs league average
G. Kitakyushu at home (19 matches) vs league average at home
G. Kitakyushu away (19 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
G. Kitakyushu | |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 22 / 38 | 58% | |
| Opponent scored first | 15 / 38 | 39% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 12 / 38 | 32% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 8 / 38 | 21% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 27.1 min. | 30% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 43.2 min. | 48% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 19.7 min. | 22% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Giravanz Kitakyushu have been in the lead for an average duration of 27.1 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 19.7 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
G. Kitakyushu | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 38 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 25 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 8 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 68% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 22 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 6 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 27% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 15 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 11 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability
Giravanz Kitakyushu have taken the lead 25 times and have conceded an equalizer on 8 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 68% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 32%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 22 times that G. Kitakyushu's opponents have taken the lead, G. Kitakyushu have managed to score an equalizer on 6 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 27%.
|
G. Kitakyushu | |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 9 / 19 | 47% | |
| Opponent scored first | 9 / 19 | 47% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 3 / 19 | 16% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 6 / 19 | 32% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 19.1 min. | 21% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 49.1 min. | 55% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 21.8 min. | 24% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, G. Kitakyushu have been in the lead for an average duration of 19.1 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 21.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
G. Kitakyushu | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 19 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 11 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 3 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 73% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 12 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 5 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 42% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 3 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 3 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, G. Kitakyushu have taken the lead 11 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 73% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 27%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 12 times that G. Kitakyushu's opponents have taken the lead when G. Kitakyushu were playing at home, G. Kitakyushu have managed to score an equalizer on 5 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 42%.
|
G. Kitakyushu | |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 13 / 19 | 68% | |
| Opponent scored first | 6 / 19 | 32% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 9 / 19 | 47% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 2 / 19 | 11% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 35.1 min. | 39% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 37.3 min. | 41% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 17.6 min. | 20% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, G. Kitakyushu have been in the lead for an average duration of 35.1 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 17.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
G. Kitakyushu | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 19 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 14 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 5 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 64% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 10 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 1 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 10% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 12 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 8 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, G. Kitakyushu have taken the lead 14 times and have conceded an equalizer on 5 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 64% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 36%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 10 times that G. Kitakyushu's opponents have taken the lead when G. Kitakyushu were playing away, G. Kitakyushu have managed to score an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away equalizing rate of 10%.
Results table
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 19 | 27 | 46 |
| GF per match | 1.00 | 1.42 | 1.21 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 18 | 23 | 41 |
| GA per match | 0.95 | 1.21 | 1.08 |
| GF + GA per match | 1.95 | 2.63 | 2.29 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 95% | 100% | 97% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 63% | 63% | 63% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 32% | 53% | 42% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 5% | 32% | 18% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 0% | 16% | 8% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 53% | 63% | 58% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 16% | 16% | 16% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 5% | 5% | 5% |
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 37% | 26% | 32% |
| Won-to-nil | 32% | 26% | 29% |
| Failed to score | 21% | 26% | 24% |
| Lost-to-nil | 16% | 26% | 21% |
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 79% | 74% | 76% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 26% | 53% | 39% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 53% | 42% | 47% |
| Scored in both halves | 0% | 21% | 11% |
| Both teams scored | 47% | 47% | 47% |
| Conceding Rate | 63% | 74% | 68% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 37% | 16% | 26% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 47% | 68% | 58% |
| Conceded in both halves | 21% | 11% | 16% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 79% | 74% | 76% |
| GF over 1.5 | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| GF over 2.5 | 0% | 21% | 11% |
| GF over 3.5 | 0% | 5% | 3% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 63% | 74% | 68% |
| GA over 1.5 | 26% | 26% | 26% |
| GA over 2.5 | 5% | 16% | 11% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 5% | 3% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in G. Kitakyushu matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 5% | 0% | 3% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 32% | 37% | 34% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 32% | 11% | 21% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 26% | 21% | 24% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 5% | 16% | 11% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 0% | 16% | 8% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 37% | 37% | 37% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 58% | 32% | 45% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 5% | 32% | 18% |
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Away wins | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Home & Away defeats | 13 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
|
A majority of G. Kitakyushu's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (10 wins), while 7 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more. A majority of G. Kitakyushu's defeats had a one-goal margin (13 defeats), while 3 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more. |
||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 50% | 50% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 41% | 59% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 44% | 56% | ||
| League average | 55% | 45% | ||
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 3 | 9 | 12 | 32% |
| Drawing at HT | 10 | 8 | 18 | 47% |
| Losing at HT | 6 | 2 | 8 | 21% |
| Total | 19 | 19 | 38 | |
Goal times
|
G. Kitakyushu |
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 13 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 13 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 17 | 37% | |
| GA | 13 | 32% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 29 | 63% | |
| GA | 28 | 68% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 50 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 55 |
|
G. Kitakyushu |
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 6 | 32% | |
| GA | 8 | 44% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 13 | 68% | |
| GA | 10 | 56% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 54 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 50 |
|
G. Kitakyushu |
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 9 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 11 | 41% | |
| GA | 5 | 22% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 16 | 59% | |
| GA | 18 | 78% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 47 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 58 |
G. Kitakyushu scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The G. Kitakyushu score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 1-0 so far (4 times).
The G. Kitakyushu score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-0 so far (4 times).
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Nagano Parceiro |
(regular season) |
Seasonal match statistics |
| GP | W | D | L | ||
| Home | 19 | 6 | 5 | 8 | |
| Away | 19 | 3 | 3 | 13 | |
| Total | 38 | 9 | 8 | 21 |
Nagano Parceiro's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Results
Comparison with league average
|
Nagano Parceiro (38 matches) vs league average
Nagano Parceiro at home (19 matches) vs league average at home
Nagano Parceiro away (19 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Nagano Parceiro | |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 12 / 38 | 32% | |
| Opponent scored first | 23 / 38 | 61% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 6 / 38 | 16% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 15 / 38 | 39% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 15.9 min. | 18% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 42.7 min. | 47% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 31.4 min. | 35% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Nagano Parceiro have been in the lead for an average duration of 15.9 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 31.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Nagano Parceiro | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 38 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 14 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 5 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 64% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 28 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 7 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 25% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 8 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 24 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability
Nagano Parceiro have taken the lead 14 times and have conceded an equalizer on 5 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 64% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 36%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 28 times that Nagano Parceiro's opponents have taken the lead, Nagano Parceiro have managed to score an equalizer on 7 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 25%.
|
Nagano Parceiro | |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 7 / 19 | 37% | |
| Opponent scored first | 11 / 19 | 58% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 3 / 19 | 16% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 8 / 19 | 42% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 19.6 min. | 22% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 39.1 min. | 43% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 31.4 min. | 35% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Nagano Parceiro have been in the lead for an average duration of 19.6 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 31.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Nagano Parceiro | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 19 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 9 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 3 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 67% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 13 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 5 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 38% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 4 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 8 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Nagano Parceiro have taken the lead 9 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 67% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 33%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 13 times that Nagano Parceiro's opponents have taken the lead when Nagano Parceiro were playing at home, Nagano Parceiro have managed to score an equalizer on 5 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 38%.
|
Nagano Parceiro | |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 5 / 19 | 26% | |
| Opponent scored first | 12 / 19 | 63% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 3 / 19 | 16% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 7 / 19 | 37% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 12.2 min. | 14% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 46.3 min. | 51% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 31.5 min. | 35% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Nagano Parceiro have been in the lead for an average duration of 12.2 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 31.5 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Nagano Parceiro | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 19 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 5 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 2 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 60% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 15 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 2 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 13% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 4 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 16 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Nagano Parceiro have taken the lead 5 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 60% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 40%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 15 times that Nagano Parceiro's opponents have taken the lead when Nagano Parceiro were playing away, Nagano Parceiro have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 13%.
Results table
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 18 | 11 | 29 |
| GF per match | 0.95 | 0.58 | 0.76 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 24 | 33 | 57 |
| GA per match | 1.26 | 1.74 | 1.50 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.21 | 2.32 | 2.26 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 95% | 89% | 92% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 63% | 63% | 63% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 37% | 42% | 39% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 21% | 21% | 21% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 5% | 11% | 8% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 5% | 3% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 74% | 58% | 66% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 26% | 26% | 26% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 11% | 5% | 8% |
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 26% | 21% | 24% |
| Won-to-nil | 21% | 11% | 16% |
| Failed to score | 26% | 63% | 45% |
| Lost-to-nil | 21% | 53% | 37% |
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 74% | 37% | 55% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 42% | 21% | 32% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 37% | 26% | 32% |
| Scored in both halves | 5% | 11% | 8% |
| Both teams scored | 53% | 26% | 39% |
| Conceding Rate | 74% | 79% | 76% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 58% | 47% | 53% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 32% | 63% | 47% |
| Conceded in both halves | 16% | 32% | 24% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 74% | 37% | 55% |
| GF over 1.5 | 16% | 11% | 13% |
| GF over 2.5 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| GF over 3.5 | 0% | 5% | 3% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 74% | 79% | 76% |
| GA over 1.5 | 32% | 58% | 45% |
| GA over 2.5 | 16% | 21% | 18% |
| GA over 3.5 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 5% | 3% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Nagano Parceiro matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 5% | 11% | 8% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 32% | 26% | 29% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 26% | 21% | 24% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 16% | 21% | 18% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 16% | 11% | 13% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 5% | 11% | 8% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 37% | 37% | 37% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 42% | 42% | 42% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 21% | 21% | 21% |
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Away wins | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Away defeats | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
| Home & Away defeats | 10 | 7 | 2 | 2 |
|
A majority of Nagano Parceiro's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (7 wins), while 2 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more. A majority of Nagano Parceiro's defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (11 defeats), while 10 of their defeats had a one-goal margin. |
||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 66% | 34% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 0.63 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 62% | 38% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 42% | 58% | ||
| League average | 55% | 45% | ||
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 3 | 3 | 6 | 16% |
| Drawing at HT | 8 | 9 | 17 | 45% |
| Losing at HT | 8 | 7 | 15 | 39% |
| Total | 19 | 19 | 38 | |
Goal times
|
Nagano Parceiro |
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 11 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 15 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 13 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 13 | 45% | |
| GA | 25 | 44% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 16 | 55% | |
| GA | 32 | 56% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 48 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 51 |
|
Nagano Parceiro |
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 8 | 44% | |
| GA | 13 | 54% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 10 | 56% | |
| GA | 11 | 46% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 49 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 45 |
|
Nagano Parceiro |
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 5 | 45% | |
| GA | 12 | 36% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 6 | 55% | |
| GA | 21 | 64% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 47 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 55 |
Nagano Parceiro scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Nagano Parceiro score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 1-1 so far (4 times).
The Nagano Parceiro score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 2-0 so far (4 times).
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Tables overview | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
