Visual table |
Seasonal streaks | ||||||||||||||
|
|
FC Tokyo |
(regular season) |
Seasonal match statistics |
| GP | W | D | L | ||
| Home | 19 | 8 | 4 | 7 | |
| Away | 19 | 5 | 7 | 7 | |
| Total | 38 | 13 | 11 | 14 |
FC Tokyo's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Results
Comparison with league average
|
FC Tokyo (38 matches) vs league average
FC Tokyo at home (19 matches) vs league average at home
FC Tokyo away (19 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
| |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 16 / 38 | 42% | |
| Opponent scored first | 19 / 38 | 50% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 6 / 38 | 16% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 7 / 38 | 18% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 16.1 min. | 18% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 54.4 min. | 60% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 19.5 min. | 22% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, FC Tokyo have been in the lead for an average duration of 16.1 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 19.5 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 38 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 20 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 7 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 65% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 23 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 9 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 39% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 12 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 18 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability
FC Tokyo have taken the lead 20 times and have conceded an equalizer on 7 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 65% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 35%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 23 times that FC Tokyo's opponents have taken the lead, FC Tokyo have managed to score an equalizer on 9 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 39%.
|
| |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 9 / 19 | 47% | |
| Opponent scored first | 9 / 19 | 47% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 3 / 19 | 16% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 4 / 19 | 21% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 14.3 min. | 16% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 52.9 min. | 59% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 22.7 min. | 25% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, FC Tokyo have been in the lead for an average duration of 14.3 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 22.7 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 19 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 12 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 4 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 67% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 11 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 4 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 36% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 7 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 11 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, FC Tokyo have taken the lead 12 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 67% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 33%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 11 times that FC Tokyo's opponents have taken the lead when FC Tokyo were playing at home, FC Tokyo have managed to score an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 36%.
|
| |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 7 / 19 | 37% | |
| Opponent scored first | 10 / 19 | 53% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 3 / 19 | 16% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 3 / 19 | 16% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 17.8 min. | 20% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 55.9 min. | 62% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 16.3 min. | 18% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, FC Tokyo have been in the lead for an average duration of 17.8 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 16.3 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 19 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 8 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 3 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 62% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 12 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 5 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 42% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 5 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 7 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, FC Tokyo have taken the lead 8 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 62% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 38%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 12 times that FC Tokyo's opponents have taken the lead when FC Tokyo were playing away, FC Tokyo have managed to score an equalizer on 5 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 42%.
Results table
FC Tokyo stats rank the team in 11th position in the the league table with 50 points, 2 points behind Cerezo Osaka and 2 points above Avispa Fukuoka. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 23 | 18 | 41 |
| GF per match | 1.21 | 0.95 | 1.08 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 26 | 22 | 48 |
| GA per match | 1.37 | 1.16 | 1.26 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.58 | 2.11 | 2.34 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 95% | 89% | 92% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 68% | 58% | 63% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 53% | 32% | 42% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 32% | 21% | 26% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 11% | 11% | 11% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 47% | 47% | 47% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 21% | 16% | 18% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 11% | 0% | 5% |
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 26% | 32% | 29% |
| Won-to-nil | 21% | 21% | 21% |
| Failed to score | 37% | 42% | 39% |
| Lost-to-nil | 32% | 32% | 32% |
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 63% | 58% | 61% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 32% | 32% | 32% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 47% | 47% | 47% |
| Scored in both halves | 16% | 21% | 18% |
| Both teams scored | 42% | 37% | 39% |
| Conceding Rate | 74% | 68% | 71% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 32% | 32% | 32% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 58% | 58% | 58% |
| Conceded in both halves | 16% | 21% | 18% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 63% | 58% | 61% |
| GF over 1.5 | 37% | 26% | 32% |
| GF over 2.5 | 21% | 11% | 16% |
| GF over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 74% | 68% | 71% |
| GA over 1.5 | 37% | 37% | 37% |
| GA over 2.5 | 21% | 11% | 16% |
| GA over 3.5 | 5% | 0% | 3% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in FC Tokyo matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 5% | 11% | 8% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 26% | 32% | 29% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 16% | 26% | 21% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 21% | 11% | 16% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 21% | 11% | 16% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 11% | 11% | 11% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 32% | 42% | 37% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 37% | 37% | 37% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 32% | 21% | 26% |
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Away wins | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Away defeats | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
|
A majority of FC Tokyo's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (9 wins), while 4 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more. FC Tokyo have conceded as many one-goal margin defeats as defeats with a margin of 2 goals or more (7 defeats for each). |
||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 56% | 44% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 56% | 44% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 54% | 46% | ||
| League average | 55% | 45% | ||
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 3 | 3 | 6 | 16% |
| Drawing at HT | 12 | 13 | 25 | 66% |
| Losing at HT | 4 | 3 | 7 | 18% |
| Total | 19 | 19 | 38 | |
Goal times
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 13 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 19 | ||
| GA | 14 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 12 | 29% | |
| GA | 15 | 31% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 29 | 71% | |
| GA | 33 | 69% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 61 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 58 |
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 13 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 6 | 26% | |
| GA | 9 | 35% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 17 | 74% | |
| GA | 17 | 65% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 67 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 54 |
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 6 | 33% | |
| GA | 6 | 27% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 12 | 67% | |
| GA | 16 | 73% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 53 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 63 |
FC Tokyo scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The FC Tokyo score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 1-0 so far (3 times).
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Machida Zelvia |
(regular season) |
Seasonal match statistics |
| GP | W | D | L | ||
| Home | 19 | 9 | 3 | 7 | |
| Away | 19 | 8 | 6 | 5 | |
| Total | 38 | 17 | 9 | 12 |
Machida Zelvia's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Results
Comparison with league average
|
Machida Zelvia (38 matches) vs league average
Machida Zelvia at home (19 matches) vs league average at home
Machida Zelvia away (19 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
| |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 23 / 38 | 61% | |
| Opponent scored first | 12 / 38 | 32% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 15 / 38 | 39% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 5 / 38 | 13% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 29.1 min. | 32% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 47.9 min. | 53% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 12.9 min. | 14% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Machida Zelvia have been in the lead for an average duration of 29.1 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 12.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 38 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 28 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 11 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 61% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 18 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 6 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 33% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 18 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 9 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability
Machida Zelvia have taken the lead 28 times and have conceded an equalizer on 11 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 61% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 39%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 18 times that Machida Zelvia's opponents have taken the lead, Machida Zelvia have managed to score an equalizer on 6 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 33%.
|
| |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 11 / 19 | 58% | |
| Opponent scored first | 7 / 19 | 37% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 10 / 19 | 53% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 3 / 19 | 16% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 34.4 min. | 38% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 40.6 min. | 45% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 15.0 min. | 17% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Machida Zelvia have been in the lead for an average duration of 34.4 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 15.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 19 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 13 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 4 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 69% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 9 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 2 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 22% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 11 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 5 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Machida Zelvia have taken the lead 13 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 69% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 31%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 9 times that Machida Zelvia's opponents have taken the lead when Machida Zelvia were playing at home, Machida Zelvia have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 22%.
|
| |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 12 / 19 | 63% | |
| Opponent scored first | 5 / 19 | 26% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 5 / 19 | 26% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 2 / 19 | 11% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 23.8 min. | 26% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 55.3 min. | 61% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 10.8 min. | 12% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Machida Zelvia have been in the lead for an average duration of 23.8 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 10.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 19 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 15 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 7 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 53% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 9 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 4 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 44% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 7 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 4 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Machida Zelvia have taken the lead 15 times and have conceded an equalizer on 7 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 53% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 47%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 9 times that Machida Zelvia's opponents have taken the lead when Machida Zelvia were playing away, Machida Zelvia have managed to score an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 44%.
Results table
Machida Zelvia stats rank the team in 6th position in the the league table with 60 points, 4 points behind Vissel Kobe and 1 point above Urawa RD. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 26 | 26 | 52 |
| GF per match | 1.37 | 1.37 | 1.37 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 18 | 20 | 38 |
| GA per match | 0.95 | 1.05 | 1.00 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.32 | 2.42 | 2.37 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 95% | 89% | 92% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 68% | 58% | 63% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 53% | 47% | 50% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 16% | 26% | 21% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 0% | 5% | 3% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 5% | 3% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 74% | 53% | 63% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 37% | 16% | 26% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 5% | 5% | 5% |
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 37% | 37% | 37% |
| Won-to-nil | 32% | 26% | 29% |
| Failed to score | 32% | 26% | 29% |
| Lost-to-nil | 26% | 16% | 21% |
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 68% | 74% | 71% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 58% | 42% | 50% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 37% | 63% | 50% |
| Scored in both halves | 26% | 32% | 29% |
| Both teams scored | 37% | 47% | 42% |
| Conceding Rate | 63% | 63% | 63% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 21% | 26% | 24% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 53% | 53% | 53% |
| Conceded in both halves | 11% | 16% | 13% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 68% | 74% | 71% |
| GF over 1.5 | 42% | 47% | 45% |
| GF over 2.5 | 26% | 11% | 18% |
| GF over 3.5 | 0% | 5% | 3% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 63% | 63% | 63% |
| GA over 1.5 | 26% | 26% | 26% |
| GA over 2.5 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 5% | 3% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 5% | 3% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Machida Zelvia matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 5% | 11% | 8% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 26% | 32% | 29% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 16% | 11% | 13% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 37% | 21% | 29% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 16% | 21% | 18% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 0% | 5% | 3% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 32% | 42% | 37% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 53% | 32% | 42% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 16% | 26% | 21% |
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Away wins | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Home & Away wins | 9 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
|
A majority of Machida Zelvia's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (9 wins), while 8 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more. A majority of Machida Zelvia's defeats had a one-goal margin (9 defeats), while 3 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more. |
||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 50% | 50% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.58 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.58 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 50% | 50% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 47% | 53% | ||
| League average | 55% | 45% | ||
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 10 | 5 | 15 | 39% |
| Drawing at HT | 6 | 12 | 18 | 47% |
| Losing at HT | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13% |
| Total | 19 | 19 | 38 | |
Goal times
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 11 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 10 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 14 | ||
| GA | 13 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 25 | 48% | |
| GA | 12 | 32% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 27 | 52% | |
| GA | 26 | 68% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 50 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 59 |
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 16 | 62% | |
| GA | 6 | 33% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 10 | 38% | |
| GA | 12 | 67% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 45 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 57 |
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 9 | 35% | |
| GA | 6 | 30% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 17 | 65% | |
| GA | 14 | 70% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 56 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 61 |
Machida Zelvia scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Tables overview | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
