Visual table |
Seasonal streaksOutcome Surprise-LevelMore information on the calculation of the Outcome surprise-level is outlined in the following blog article: | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
Kyoto Sanga |
(regular season) |
Seasonal match statistics |
| GP | W | D | L | ||
| Home | 19 | 9 | 6 | 4 | |
| Away | 19 | 10 | 5 | 4 | |
| Total | 38 | 19 | 11 | 8 |
Kyoto Sanga's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Results
Comparison with league average
|
Kyoto Sanga (38 matches) vs league average
Kyoto Sanga at home (19 matches) vs league average at home
Kyoto Sanga away (19 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
| |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 20 / 38 | 53% | |
| Opponent scored first | 18 / 38 | 47% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 14 / 38 | 37% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 11 / 38 | 29% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 27.0 min. | 30% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 42.1 min. | 47% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 20.9 min. | 23% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Kyoto Sanga have been in the lead for an average duration of 27.0 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 20.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 38 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 28 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 9 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 68% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 22 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 14 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 64% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 20 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 9 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability
Kyoto Sanga have taken the lead 28 times and have conceded an equalizer on 9 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 68% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 32%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 22 times that Kyoto Sanga's opponents have taken the lead, Kyoto Sanga have managed to score an equalizer on 14 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 64%.
|
| |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 12 / 19 | 63% | |
| Opponent scored first | 7 / 19 | 37% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 8 / 19 | 42% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 3 / 19 | 16% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 30.2 min. | 34% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 43.6 min. | 48% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 16.2 min. | 18% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Kyoto Sanga have been in the lead for an average duration of 30.2 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 16.2 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 19 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 14 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 5 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 64% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 8 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 4 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 11 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 4 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Kyoto Sanga have taken the lead 14 times and have conceded an equalizer on 5 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 64% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 36%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 8 times that Kyoto Sanga's opponents have taken the lead when Kyoto Sanga were playing at home, Kyoto Sanga have managed to score an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 50%.
|
| |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 8 / 19 | 42% | |
| Opponent scored first | 11 / 19 | 58% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 6 / 19 | 32% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 8 / 19 | 42% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 23.8 min. | 26% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 40.6 min. | 45% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 25.6 min. | 28% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Kyoto Sanga have been in the lead for an average duration of 23.8 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 25.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 19 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 14 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 4 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 71% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 14 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 10 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 71% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 9 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 5 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Kyoto Sanga have taken the lead 14 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 71% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 29%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 14 times that Kyoto Sanga's opponents have taken the lead when Kyoto Sanga were playing away, Kyoto Sanga have managed to score an equalizer on 10 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 71%.
Results table
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 29 | 33 | 62 |
| GF per match | 1.53 | 1.74 | 1.63 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 17 | 23 | 40 |
| GA per match | 0.89 | 1.21 | 1.05 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.42 | 2.95 | 2.68 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 79% | 84% | 82% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 37% | 63% | 50% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 16% | 21% | 18% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 11% | 11% | 11% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 11% | 5% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 68% | 74% | 71% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 26% | 26% | 26% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 16% | 16% | 16% |
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 32% | 21% | 26% |
| Won-to-nil | 32% | 21% | 26% |
| Failed to score | 16% | 11% | 13% |
| Lost-to-nil | 16% | 11% | 13% |
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 84% | 89% | 87% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 53% | 42% | 47% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 63% | 74% | 68% |
| Scored in both halves | 32% | 26% | 29% |
| Both teams scored | 53% | 68% | 61% |
| Conceding Rate | 68% | 79% | 74% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 32% | 42% | 37% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 47% | 53% | 50% |
| Conceded in both halves | 11% | 16% | 13% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 84% | 89% | 87% |
| GF over 1.5 | 42% | 53% | 47% |
| GF over 2.5 | 16% | 21% | 18% |
| GF over 3.5 | 5% | 11% | 8% |
| GF over 4.5 | 5% | 0% | 3% |
| GA over 0.5 | 68% | 79% | 74% |
| GA over 1.5 | 11% | 32% | 21% |
| GA over 2.5 | 11% | 11% | 11% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Kyoto Sanga matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 21% | 16% | 18% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 42% | 21% | 32% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 5% | 11% | 8% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 11% | 11% | 11% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 21% | 16% | 18% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 63% | 63% | 63% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 16% | 21% | 18% |
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Away wins | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Home & Away wins | 12 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
A majority of Kyoto Sanga's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (12 wins), while 7 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more. A majority of Kyoto Sanga's defeats had a one-goal margin (6 defeats), while 2 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more. |
||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 49% | 51% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 47% | 53% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 42% | 57% | ||
| League average | 55% | 45% | ||
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 8 | 6 | 14 | 37% |
| Drawing at HT | 8 | 5 | 13 | 34% |
| Losing at HT | 3 | 8 | 11 | 29% |
| Total | 19 | 19 | 38 | |
Goal times
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 11 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 12 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 12 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 17 | ||
| GA | 10 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 25 | 40% | |
| GA | 19 | 48% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 37 | 60% | |
| GA | 21 | 52% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 55 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 52 |
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 15 | 52% | |
| GA | 7 | 41% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 14 | 48% | |
| GA | 10 | 59% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 49 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 54 |
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 12 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 10 | 30% | |
| GA | 12 | 52% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 23 | 70% | |
| GA | 11 | 48% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 60 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 50 |
Kyoto Sanga scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Kyoto Sanga score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 1-1 so far (6 times).
The Kyoto Sanga score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-2 so far (5 times).
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Kashima Antlers |
(regular season) |
Seasonal match statistics |
| GP | W | D | L | ||
| Home | 19 | 13 | 4 | 2 | |
| Away | 19 | 10 | 3 | 6 | |
| Total | 38 | 23 | 7 | 8 |
Kashima Antlers' progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Results
Comparison with league average
|
Kashima Antlers (38 matches) vs league average
Kashima Antlers at home (19 matches) vs league average at home
Kashima Antlers away (19 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
| |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 23 / 38 | 61% | |
| Opponent scored first | 13 / 38 | 34% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 13 / 38 | 34% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 8 / 38 | 21% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 31.4 min. | 35% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 41.8 min. | 46% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 16.9 min. | 19% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Kashima Antlers have been in the lead for an average duration of 31.4 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 16.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 38 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 29 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 6 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 79% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 17 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 9 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 53% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 20 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 8 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability
Kashima Antlers have taken the lead 29 times and have conceded an equalizer on 6 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 79% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 21%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 17 times that Kashima Antlers's opponents have taken the lead, Kashima Antlers have managed to score an equalizer on 9 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 53%.
|
| |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 13 / 19 | 68% | |
| Opponent scored first | 5 / 19 | 26% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 8 / 19 | 42% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 2 / 19 | 11% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 38.1 min. | 42% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 39.8 min. | 44% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 12.1 min. | 13% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Kashima Antlers have been in the lead for an average duration of 38.1 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 12.1 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 19 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 17 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 4 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 76% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 8 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 6 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 75% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 11 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 4 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Kashima Antlers have taken the lead 17 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 76% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 24%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 8 times that Kashima Antlers's opponents have taken the lead when Kashima Antlers were playing at home, Kashima Antlers have managed to score an equalizer on 6 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 75%.
|
| |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 10 / 19 | 53% | |
| Opponent scored first | 8 / 19 | 42% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 5 / 19 | 26% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 6 / 19 | 32% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 24.6 min. | 27% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 43.7 min. | 49% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 21.6 min. | 24% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Kashima Antlers have been in the lead for an average duration of 24.6 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 21.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
| |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 19 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 12 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 2 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 83% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 9 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 3 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 33% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 9 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 4 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Kashima Antlers have taken the lead 12 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 83% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 17%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 9 times that Kashima Antlers's opponents have taken the lead when Kashima Antlers were playing away, Kashima Antlers have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 33%.
Results table
Kashima Antlers stats rank the team in 1st position in the the league table with 76 points, 1 point above Kashiwa Reysol. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 34 | 24 | 58 |
| GF per match | 1.79 | 1.26 | 1.53 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 16 | 15 | 31 |
| GA per match | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.82 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.63 | 2.05 | 2.34 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 95% | 95% | 95% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 74% | 53% | 63% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 53% | 42% | 47% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 21% | 16% | 18% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 11% | 0% | 5% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 5% | 0% | 3% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 68% | 68% | 68% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 32% | 26% | 29% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 11% | 5% | 8% |
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 42% | 42% | 42% |
| Won-to-nil | 37% | 37% | 37% |
| Failed to score | 5% | 21% | 13% |
| Lost-to-nil | 0% | 16% | 8% |
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 95% | 79% | 87% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 58% | 42% | 50% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 74% | 53% | 63% |
| Scored in both halves | 37% | 16% | 26% |
| Both teams scored | 58% | 42% | 50% |
| Conceding Rate | 58% | 58% | 58% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 32% | 42% | 37% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 32% | 21% | 26% |
| Conceded in both halves | 5% | 5% | 5% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 95% | 79% | 87% |
| GF over 1.5 | 53% | 26% | 39% |
| GF over 2.5 | 26% | 16% | 21% |
| GF over 3.5 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 58% | 58% | 58% |
| GA over 1.5 | 16% | 16% | 16% |
| GA over 2.5 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| GA over 3.5 | 5% | 0% | 3% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Kashima Antlers matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 21% | 11% | 16% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 32% | 26% | 29% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 11% | 16% | 13% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 11% | 0% | 5% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 26% | 47% | 37% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 53% | 37% | 45% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 21% | 16% | 18% |
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Away wins | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Home & Away wins | 16 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
A majority of Kashima Antlers' wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (16 wins), while 7 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more. A majority of Kashima Antlers' defeats had a one-goal margin (7 defeats), while 1 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more. |
||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 57% | 43% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 2.26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 59% | 41% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 52% | 48% | ||
| League average | 55% | 45% | ||
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 8 | 5 | 13 | 34% |
| Drawing at HT | 9 | 8 | 17 | 45% |
| Losing at HT | 2 | 6 | 8 | 21% |
| Total | 19 | 19 | 38 | |
Goal times
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 9 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 12 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 14 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 24 | 41% | |
| GA | 17 | 55% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 34 | 59% | |
| GA | 14 | 45% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 52 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 46 |
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 15 | 44% | |
| GA | 6 | 38% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 19 | 56% | |
| GA | 10 | 62% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 51 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 56 |
|
|
| (regular season) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 9 | 38% | |
| GA | 11 | 73% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 15 | 62% | |
| GA | 4 | 27% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 53 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 36 |
Kashima Antlers scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Kashima Antlers score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 0-1 so far (5 times).
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Tables overview | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
