back to top
LEAGUES MATCHES STATS FAV BLOG

 Favourite leagues
 -------------------------------
 My Favourites
 ------------------------------- Select favourites
 Featured leagues
 ------------------------------- ENG - Premier League ITA - Serie A SPA - La Liga FRA - Ligue 1 GER - Bundesliga
 All leagues
 ------------------------------- See 'Search league' box Display all leagues
 International (clubs)
 ------------------------------- Champions League Europa League Conference League Copa Libertadores Copa Sudamericana AFC Champions League FIFA Club World Cup Champions League (W)
 International (nations)
 ------------------------------- EURO 2024 Euro Qualification UEFA Nations League World Cup 2022 WC Qualification Europe WC Qual. South-America WC Qualification Asia Copa America Africa Cup of Nations Asian Cup Women's World Cup Women's EURO 2025
MEMBER LOGIN
usa2_2025
USA - USL Championship
2026 2025
 Tables Home / Away tables Tables by Date Wide table  Matches Matches by date Results grid Results filter  Goals per match Over / Under Goal ranges Average goals Scored / conceded Both teams scored Goal margins  Goal timing Goals per 10 min. Goals per 15 min. First Goal stats  Leading / losing Lead durations Scored / conceded first Leading / Trailing at HT Goal types Equalisers scored Equalisers conceded
Birmingham L. Charleston Colorado S. Detroit City El Paso FC Tulsa Hartford A. Indy Eleven Las Vegas L. Lexington Loudoun Utd Louisville City Miami FC Monterey Bay New Mexico North Carolina Oakland Roots Orange County Phoenix Rising Pittsburgh Rhode Island Sacramento R. San Antonio Tampa Bay
SUMMARY MATCHES H2H GOALS HALF-TIME TIMING FIRST GOAL
🔍

advertisement


Visual table

  GP Pts
1  Louisville City 30 73
2  Charleston 30 62
3  FC Tulsa 30 57
4  Sacramento R. 30 48
5  New Mexico 30 48
6  North Carolina 30 45
7  Hartford A. 30 44
8  Pittsburgh 30 44
9  Loudoun Utd 30 42
10  El Paso 30 41
11  San Antonio 30 40
12  Phoenix Rising 30 40
13  Orange County 30 39
14  Rhode Island 30 38
15  Detroit City 30 37
16  Colorado S. 30 37
17  Lexington 30 36
18  Indy Eleven 30 35
19  Tampa Bay 30 34
20  Oakland Roots 30 32
21  Miami FC 30 30
22  Monterey Bay 30 29
23  Birmingham L. 30 27
24  Las Vegas L. 30 27

 
Sun 16 Mar 2025
FC Tulsa1 0Tampa Bay
Patrick Seagrist (73) 1:0






Seasonal streaks


2nd consecutive win for FC Tulsa.
2nd consecutive defeat for Tampa Bay.
2nd consecutive away defeat for Tampa Bay.
2nd consecutive game where FC Tulsa scored.
2nd consecutive game where Tampa Bay conceded.
2nd consecutive away game where Tampa Bay conceded.
2nd consecutive game with no goal scored for Tampa Bay.
2nd consecutive away game with no goal scored for Tampa Bay.
2nd consecutive game where FC Tulsa kept a clean sheet.
 

 
Lead durations in 90 minutes of regular time
090
FC Tulsa (17)Level (73)Tampa Bay
Lead durations tables
  How are the duration values calculated?⌄

To calculate the above duration values based on a total of 90 minutes, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are considered scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are considered scored on the 90th minute.






 






 flag

FC Tulsa

 (regular season)

Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 15 10 3 2  
  Away 15 6 6 3  
  Total 30 16 9 5  




FC Tulsa's progression (home & away)
Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

  FC Tulsa results 2.5+ CS FTS HT
9 Mar 25 Phoenix Rising 0:1

     0-1   Alex Dalou (25)
FC Tulsa - + - 0-1
16 Mar 25 FC Tulsa 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Patrick Seagrist (73)
Tampa Bay - + - 0-0
23 Mar 25 FC Tulsa 0:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Pedro Dolabella (82)
North Carolina - - + 0-0
29 Mar 25 FC Tulsa 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Taylor Calheira (87)
Sacramento R. - + - 0-0
13 Apr 25 FC Tulsa 1:2

     0-1   Wolfgang Prentice (31)
1-1   Owen Damm (42)
     1-2   Wolfgang Prentice (45)
Oakland Roots + - - 1-2
20 Apr 25 Las Vegas L. 1:4

     0-1   Stefan Lukic (14)
     0-2   Taylor Calheira (28) pen.
     0-3   Alex Dalou (42)
---------------------------------------
1-3   Valentin Nol (51) pen.
     1-4   Taylor Calheira (67)
FC Tulsa + - - 0-3
4 May 25 Orange County 2:1

---------------------------------------
1-0   Lyam MacKinnon (55)
     1-1   Taylor Calheira (74)
2-1   Lyam MacKinnon (80)
FC Tulsa + - - 0-0
11 May 25 FC Tulsa 1:1

     0-1   Wilmer Cabrera (32)
---------------------------------------
1-1   Kalil ElMedkhar (86)
El Paso - - - 0-1
18 May 25 Lexington 0:2

     0-1   Taylor Calheira (41) pen.
---------------------------------------
     0-2   Lamar Batista (90)
FC Tulsa - + - 0-1
29 May 25 San Antonio 1:1

1-0   Jorge Hernandez (45) pen.
---------------------------------------
     1-1   Taylor Calheira (70) pen.
FC Tulsa - - - 1-0
8 Jun 25 Sacramento R. 0:1

     0-1   Kalil ElMedkhar (10)
FC Tulsa - + - 0-1
15 Jun 25 FC Tulsa 1:1

     0-1   Ihsan Sacko (15)
---------------------------------------
1-1   Arthur Rogers (80)
Phoenix Rising - - - 0-1
5 Jul 25 Miami FC 2:2

     0-1   Taylor Calheira (13) pen.
1-1   Francisco Bonfiglio (17) pen.
     1-2   Eliot Goldthorp (45)
---------------------------------------
2-2   Francisco Bonfiglio (65)
FC Tulsa + - - 1-2
13 Jul 25 FC Tulsa 4:3

1-0   Marcos Serrato (9)
2-0   Jamie Craig Webber (16)
     2-1   Johnny Rodriguez (33)
     2-2   Shawn Smart (45)
---------------------------------------
     2-3   Shawn Smart (62)
3-3   Taylor Calheira (76)
4-3   Elias Grtig (o.g.) (90)
Las Vegas L. + - - 2-2
17 Jul 25 FC Tulsa 2:1

     0-1   Mayele Malango (9)
---------------------------------------
1-1   Boubacar Diallo (47)
2-1   Stefan Lukic (48)
Monterey Bay + - - 0-1
20 Jul 25 Louisville City 1:1

---------------------------------------
1-0   Cameron Lancaster (90)
     1-1   Kalil ElMedkhar (90)
FC Tulsa - - - 0-0
2 Aug 25 FC Tulsa 3:2

     0-1   Riley Bidois (14)
1-1   Taylor Calheira (43)
---------------------------------------
     1-2   Yanis Leerman (67)
2-2   Stefan Lukic (84)
3-2   Giordano Colli (90)
Loudoun Utd + - - 1-1
7 Aug 25 Monterey Bay 2:3

     0-1   Alex Dalou (12)
---------------------------------------
1-1   John Klein (51)
2-1   Luke Ivanovic (59)
     2-2   Stefan Lukic (71)
     2-3   Arthur Rogers (86) pen.
FC Tulsa + - - 0-1
10 Aug 25 FC Tulsa 5:2

1-0   Taylor Calheira (18) pen.
     1-1   Greg Hurst (33)
     1-2   Ousman Jabang (40)
---------------------------------------
2-2   Harvey St Clair (46)
3-2   Marcos Serrato (51)
4-2   Kalil ElMedkhar (54)
5-2   Alex Dalou (82)
New Mexico + - - 1-2
16 Aug 25 Hartford A. 1:1

     0-1   Joseph Farrell (o.g.) (45)
---------------------------------------
1-1   Kyle Edwards (46)
FC Tulsa - - - 0-1
24 Aug 25 FC Tulsa 1:0

1-0   Kalil ElMedkhar (24)
Orange County - + - 1-0
31 Aug 25 Colorado S. 2:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Quenzi Huerman (58)
2-0   C. Mrowka (90)
FC Tulsa - - + 0-0
7 Sep 25 FC Tulsa 1:1

1-0   Taylor Calheira (45) pen.
---------------------------------------
     1-1   Jacob Rufe (87)
Birmingham L. - - - 1-0
14 Sep 25 New Mexico 0:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Sergio Rivas (o.g.) (90)
FC Tulsa - + - 0-0
21 Sep 25 Oakland Roots 1:1

1-0   Peter Wilson (23)
---------------------------------------
     1-1   Taylor Calheira (51)
FC Tulsa - - - 1-0
27 Sep 25 Indy Eleven 2:1

1-0   B. Schaefer (8)
---------------------------------------
2-0   Jack Blake (68)
     2-1   Boubacar Diallo (80)
FC Tulsa + - - 1-0
5 Oct 25 FC Tulsa 3:0

1-0   Jamie Craig Webber (40)
---------------------------------------
2-0   Giordano Colli (65)
3-0   Jamie Craig Webber (88)
Lexington + + - 1-0
12 Oct 25 FC Tulsa 2:0

1-0   Taylor Calheira (8)
---------------------------------------
2-0   Lamar Batista (75)
San Antonio - + - 1-0
19 Oct 25 El Paso 1:1

1-0   Gabriel Torres (24)
---------------------------------------
     1-1   Stefan Lukic (90)
FC Tulsa - - - 1-0
26 Oct 25 FC Tulsa 3:0

1-0   Kalil ElMedkhar (10)
---------------------------------------
2-0   Taylor Calheira (57)
3-0   Taylor Calheira (79)
Colorado S. + + - 1-0
















Comparison with league average


FC Tulsa (30 matches) vs league average

(overall)FC Tulsa League AVG
Points per game  1.90 1.37
% Wins  53% 37%
% Draws  30% 26%
% Defeats  17% 37%
Goals scored per game  1.67 1.35
Goals conceded per game  1.00 1.35
% Clean sheets  33% 27%
% Failed To Score  7% 27%
% Won To Nil  33% 19%
% Lost To Nil  7% 19%
% Team scored first  57% 46%
% Opponent scored first  43% 46%
Average minute scored first  33 31
Average minute conceded first  37 31
Lead-defending rate  70% 58%
Equalizing rate  74% 42%
% Time leading  30% 25%
% Time level in goals  49% 49%
% Time trailing  21% 25%
PPG when scored first  2.65 2.17
PPG when conceded first  0.92 0.62
Total goals per game  2.67 2.70
% over 1.5 goals  77% 73%
% over 2.5 goals  40% 51%
% over 3.5 goals  20% 29%
% both teams scored  60% 54%

FC Tulsa at home (15 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)FC Tulsa League AVG
Points per game  2.20 1.59
% Wins  67% 44%
% Draws  20% 26%
% Defeats  13% 29%
Goals scored per game  1.93 1.51
Goals conceded per game  0.93 1.19
% Clean sheets  40% 31%
% Failed To Score  7% 22%
% Won To Nil  40% 23%
% Lost To Nil  7% 15%
% Team scored first  60% 51%
% Opponent scored first  40% 41%
Average minute scored first  35 31
Average minute conceded first  30 32
Lead-defending rate  77% 64%
Equalizing rate  80% 49%
% Time leading  35% 30%
% Time level in goals  44% 49%
% Time trailing  21% 21%
PPG when scored first  2.78 2.33
PPG when conceded first  1.33 0.77
Total goals per game  2.87 2.70
% over 1.5 goals  73% 73%
% over 2.5 goals  47% 51%
% over 3.5 goals  20% 29%
% both teams scored  53% 54%

FC Tulsa away (15 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)FC Tulsa League AVG
Points per game  1.60 1.15
% Wins  40% 29%
% Draws  40% 26%
% Defeats  20% 44%
Goals scored per game  1.40 1.19
Goals conceded per game  1.07 1.51
% Clean sheets  27% 22%
% Failed To Score  7% 31%
% Won To Nil  27% 15%
% Lost To Nil  7% 23%
% Team scored first  53% 41%
% Opponent scored first  47% 51%
Average minute scored first  31 32
Average minute conceded first  43 31
Lead-defending rate  60% 51%
Equalizing rate  67% 36%
% Time leading  25% 21%
% Time level in goals  55% 49%
% Time trailing  20% 30%
PPG when scored first  2.50 1.98
PPG when conceded first  0.57 0.50
Total goals per game  2.47 2.70
% over 1.5 goals  80% 73%
% over 2.5 goals  33% 51%
% over 3.5 goals  20% 29%
% both teams scored  67% 54%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag FC Tulsa
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 17 / 30 57%
  Opponent scored first 13 / 30 43%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 12 / 30 40%
  Opponent was leading at HT 9 / 30 30%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 27.0 min. 30%
  Average minutes level in goals 44.3 min. 49%
  Average minutes trailing 18.7 min. 21%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, FC Tulsa have been in the lead for an average duration of 27.0 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 18.7 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag FC Tulsa
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 30

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 23
  Equalizer goals conceded 7
  Lead defending rate * (1) 70%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 19
  Equalizer goals scored 14
  Equalizing rate * (2) 74%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 13
  Non-crucial goals conceded 4

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
FC Tulsa have taken the lead 23 times and have conceded an equalizer on 7 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 70% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 30%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 19 times that FC Tulsa's opponents have taken the lead, FC Tulsa have managed to score an equalizer on 14 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 74%.


 flag FC Tulsa
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 9 / 15 60%
  Opponent scored first 6 / 15 40%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 5 / 15 33%
  Opponent was leading at HT 5 / 15 33%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 31.5 min. 35%
  Average minutes level in goals 39.4 min. 44%
  Average minutes trailing 19.1 min. 21%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, FC Tulsa have been in the lead for an average duration of 31.5 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 19.1 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag FC Tulsa
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 15

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 13
  Equalizer goals conceded 3
  Lead defending rate * (1) 77%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 10
  Equalizer goals scored 8
  Equalizing rate * (2) 80%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 8
  Non-crucial goals conceded 1

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, FC Tulsa have taken the lead 13 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 77% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 23%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 10 times that FC Tulsa's opponents have taken the lead when FC Tulsa were playing at home, FC Tulsa have managed to score an equalizer on 8 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 80%.



 flag FC Tulsa
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 8 / 15 53%
  Opponent scored first 7 / 15 47%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 7 / 15 47%
  Opponent was leading at HT 4 / 15 27%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 22.5 min. 25%
  Average minutes level in goals 49.2 min. 55%
  Average minutes trailing 18.3 min. 20%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, FC Tulsa have been in the lead for an average duration of 22.5 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 18.3 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag FC Tulsa
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 15

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 10
  Equalizer goals conceded 4
  Lead defending rate * (1) 60%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 9
  Equalizer goals scored 6
  Equalizing rate * (2) 67%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 5
  Non-crucial goals conceded 3

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, FC Tulsa have taken the lead 10 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 60% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 40%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 9 times that FC Tulsa's opponents have taken the lead when FC Tulsa were playing away, FC Tulsa have managed to score an equalizer on 6 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 67%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Louisville City 30 73   1:1 h2h
2 Charleston 30 62     h2h
3 FC Tulsa 30 57
4 Sacramento R. 30 48 1:0 0:1 h2h
5 New Mexico 30 48 5:2 0:1 h2h
6 North Carolina 30 45 0:1   h2h
7 Hartford A. 30 44   1:1 h2h
8 Pittsburgh 30 44     h2h
9 Loudoun Utd 30 42 3:2   h2h
10 El Paso 30 41 1:1 1:1 h2h
11 San Antonio 30 40 2:0 1:1 h2h
12 Phoenix Rising 30 40 1:1 0:1 h2h
13 Orange County 30 39 1:0 2:1 h2h
14 Rhode Island 30 38     h2h
15 Detroit City 30 37     h2h
16 Colorado S. 30 37 3:0 2:0 h2h
17 Lexington 30 36 3:0 0:2 h2h
18 Indy Eleven 30 35   2:1 h2h
19 Tampa Bay 30 34 1:0   h2h
20 Oakland Roots 30 32 1:2 1:1 h2h
21 Miami FC 30 30   2:2 h2h
22 Monterey Bay 30 29 2:1 2:3 h2h
23 Birmingham L. 30 27 1:1   h2h
24 Las Vegas L. 30 27 4:3 1:4 h2h

FC Tulsa stats rank the team in 3rd position in the the league table with 57 points, 5 points behind Charleston.








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 29 2150
GF per match 1.931.40 1.67
Goals conceded (GA) 141630
GA per match 0.931.07 1.00
GF + GA per match 2.872.472.67
GF+GA over 0.5 100%100%100%
GF+GA over 1.5 73%80%77%
GF+GA over 2.5 47%33%40%
GF+GA over 3.5 20%20%20%
GF+GA over 4.5 20%13%17%
GF+GA over 5.5 13%0%7%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 80%73%77%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 27%13%20%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 20%13%17%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 40%27%33%
Won-to-nil 40%27%33%
Failed to score 7%7%7%
Lost-to-nil 7%7%7%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 93%93%93%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 60%47%53%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 73%67%70%
Scored in both halves 40%20%30%
Both teams scored 53%67%60%
Conceding Rate 60%73%67%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 47%33%40%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 27%53%40%
Conceded in both halves 13%13%13%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 93%93%93%
GF over 1.5 47%27%37%
GF over 2.5 33%13%23%
GF over 3.5 13%7%10%
GF over 4.5 7%0%3%
GA over 0.5 60%73%67%
GA over 1.5 27%33%30%
GA over 2.5 7%0%3%
GA over 3.5 0%0%0%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in FC Tulsa matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 0%0%0%
Match total goals = 1 27%20%23%
Match total goals = 2 27%47%37%
Match total goals = 3 27%13%20%
Match total goals = 4 0%7%3%
Match total goals = 5+ 20%13%17%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 27%20%23%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 53%60%57%
Match total goals = 4+ 20%20%20%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  61 30
Away wins  41 10
Home & Away wins  102 40
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  20 00
Away defeats  21 00
Home & Away defeats  41 00

A majority of FC Tulsa's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (10 wins), while 6 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more.

A majority of FC Tulsa's defeats had a one-goal margin (4 defeats), while 1 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 58%
42%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)2.20
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)1.60
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 58%
42%
  % Goals conceded 47%
53%
  League average 56%
44%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 57 12  40%
Drawing at HT 54 9  30%
Losing at HT 54 9  30%
  Total 151530







Goal times


 flag FC Tulsa
(regular season) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 7
GA 4
16-30 GF 5
GA 3
31-45 GF 8
GA 8
46-60 GF 7
GA 6
61-75 GF 7
GA 4
76-90 GF 16
GA 5
1st Half GF 20
40%
GA 15
50%
2nd Half GF 30
60%
GA 15
50%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 55
 Avg. minute goals conceded 48


  FC Tulsa
(regular season) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 3
GA 3
16-30 GF 3
GA 0
31-45 GF 4
GA 7
46-60 GF 6
GA 0
61-75 GF 3
GA 2
76-90 GF 10
GA 2
1st Half GF 10
34%
GA 10
71%
2nd Half GF 19
66%
GA 4
29%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 56
  Avg. minute goals conceded 42


  FC Tulsa
(regular season) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 4
GA 1
16-30 GF 2
GA 3
31-45 GF 4
GA 1
46-60 GF 1
GA 6
61-75 GF 4
GA 2
76-90 GF 6
GA 3
1st Half GF 10
48%
GA 5
31%
2nd Half GF 11
52%
GA 11
69%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 54
  Avg. minute goals conceded 52








FC Tulsa scores

FT at home
1-1 3 20%
1-0 3 20%
3-0 2 13%
5-2 1 7%
4-3 1 7%
3-2 1 7%
1-2 1 7%
2-1 1 7%
0-1 1 7%
2-0 1 7%
FT away
1-1 5 33%
0-1 3 20%
2-1 2 13%
1-4 1 7%
2-3 1 7%
2-2 1 7%
0-2 1 7%
2-0 1 7%
The FC Tulsa score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-1 so far (5 times).
Half-time at home
1-0 5 33%
0-1 3 20%
0-0 3 20%
1-2 2 13%
2-2 1 7%
1-1 1 7%
Half-time away
0-1 5 33%
1-0 4 27%
0-0 4 27%
0-3 1 7%
1-2 1 7%



 flag

Tampa Bay

 (regular season)

Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 15 5 5 5  
  Away 15 4 2 9  
  Total 30 9 7 14  




Tampa Bay's progression (home & away)
Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

  Tampa Bay results 2.5+ CS FTS HT
9 Mar 25 Las Vegas L. 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Christian Pinzn (74)
Tampa Bay - - + 0-0
16 Mar 25 FC Tulsa 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Patrick Seagrist (73)
Tampa Bay - - + 0-0
22 Mar 25 Miami FC 1:2

1-0   Francisco Bonfiglio (2)
     1-1   Woobens Pacius (31)
     1-2   Daniel Crisostomo (45)
Tampa Bay + - - 1-2
5 Apr 25 Charleston 2:1

1-0   Cal Jennings (45) pen.
---------------------------------------
2-0   Matt Myers (73)
     2-1   Woobens Pacius (75)
Tampa Bay + - - 1-0
12 Apr 25 Tampa Bay 1:2

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Abdellatif Aboukoura (69) pen.
     0-2   Wesley Leggett (85)
1-2   Woobens Pacius (90)
Loudoun Utd + - - 0-0
19 Apr 25 Tampa Bay 1:2

---------------------------------------
1-0   Ollie Bassett (58)
     1-1   Taylor Davila (69)
     1-2   Sam Gleadle (74)
Louisville City + - - 0-0
3 May 25 Tampa Bay 2:2

1-0   Leonardo Fernandes (26) pen.
---------------------------------------
     1-1   Enzo Martnez (70)
     1-2   Daniel Trejo (76)
2-2   P. Niyongabire (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-0
10 May 25 Tampa Bay 1:3

     0-1   Cal Jennings (7) pen.
     0-2   Matt Myers (19)
     0-3   Matt Myers (28)
---------------------------------------
1-3   Woobens Pacius (77)
Charleston + - - 0-3
17 May 25 Tampa Bay 0:3

     0-1   Clay Holstad (45)
---------------------------------------
     0-2   Zachary Herivaux (73)
     0-3   Noah Fuson (87)
Rhode Island + - + 0-1
24 May 25 Lexington 1:1

1-0   F. Ajago (31)
---------------------------------------
     1-1   Manuel Arteaga (62)
Tampa Bay - - - 1-0
8 Jun 25 Louisville City 2:1

1-0   Phillip Goodrum (7)
2-0   Ray Serrano (16)
     2-1   Woobens Pacius (31)
Tampa Bay + - - 2-1
14 Jun 25 Tampa Bay 2:1

     0-1   Francisco Bonfiglio (42)
---------------------------------------
1-1   Aaron Guilln (74)
2-1   Manuel Arteaga (90)
Miami FC + - - 0-1
21 Jun 25 Pittsburgh 2:1

1-0   Thomas Vancaeyezeele (o.g.) (15)
2-0   Augustine Williams (20)
     2-1   Manuel Arteaga (40)
Tampa Bay + - - 2-1
25 Jun 25 Tampa Bay 3:1

     0-1   Maalique Foster (45)
---------------------------------------
1-1   Blake Bodily (60)
2-1   Nick Moon (69)
3-1   Laurence Wyke (90)
Indy Eleven + - - 0-1
13 Jul 25 San Antonio 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Luke Haakenson (90)
Tampa Bay - - + 0-0
16 Jul 25 Hartford A. 0:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Woobens Pacius (83)
Tampa Bay - + - 0-0
2 Aug 25 Indy Eleven 1:3

     0-1   Woobens Pacius (12)
1-1   Benjamin Ofeimu (44)
---------------------------------------
     1-2   Luis Alvarez (57)
     1-3   Joseph Skinner (90)
Tampa Bay + - - 1-1
9 Aug 25 North Carolina 2:1

     0-1   Lewis Hilton (23)
1-1   Evan Conway (39)
2-1   Louis Prez (45) pen.
Tampa Bay + - - 2-1
17 Aug 25 Tampa Bay 1:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Pierce Rizzo (73)
1-1   Manuel Arteaga (75)
Phoenix Rising - - - 0-0
23 Aug 25 Detroit City 2:0

1-0   Alasanne Ates Diouf (30)
2-0   Darren Smith (39)
Tampa Bay - - + 2-0
30 Aug 25 Tampa Bay 2:1

     0-1   C. Ahl (2)
---------------------------------------
1-1   Lewis Hilton (64)
2-1   Woobens Pacius (75)
Pittsburgh + - - 0-1
6 Sep 25 Tampa Bay 0:2

     0-1   Rodrigo Lpez (29)
---------------------------------------
     0-2   Russell Cicerone (90)
Sacramento R. - - + 0-1
13 Sep 25 Tampa Bay 3:3

1-0   Paul Marie (8)
     1-1   Juan Tejada (17)
2-1   Woobens Pacius (21)
3-1   Robert Castellanos (25)
     3-2   Juan Tejada (32)
---------------------------------------
     3-3   Marco Micaletto (58)
Colorado S. + - - 3-2
17 Sep 25 Birmingham L. 1:4

1-0   Dawson McCartney (12)
---------------------------------------
     1-1   Manuel Arteaga (64)
     1-2   Paul Marie (68)
     1-3   Paul Marie (89)
     1-4   Luis Alvarez (90)
Tampa Bay + - - 1-0
20 Sep 25 Tampa Bay 2:2

     0-1   Evan Conway (14)
1-1   Manuel Arteaga (37)
---------------------------------------
2-1   Woobens Pacius (82)
     2-2   Oalex Anderson (90)
North Carolina + - - 1-1
28 Sep 25 Loudoun Utd 2:2

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Manuel Arteaga (56) pen.
1-1   Abdellatif Aboukoura (90) pen.
2-1   Garrison Tubbs (90)
     2-2   Joseph Skinner (90)
Tampa Bay + - - 0-0
4 Oct 25 Tampa Bay 4:0

1-0   Woobens Pacius (35)
---------------------------------------
2-0   Daniel Crisostomo (62)
3-0   Woobens Pacius (73)
4-0   Manuel Arteaga (88)
Monterey Bay + + - 1-0
11 Oct 25 Rhode Island 5:0

1-0   Jerome Williams (8)
2-0   Noah Fuson (28)
3-0   Jerome Williams (45) pen.
---------------------------------------
4-0   Albert Dikwa (69)
5-0   Maxi Rodrguez (88)
Tampa Bay + - + 3-0
18 Oct 25 Tampa Bay 3:2

1-0   Manuel Arteaga (8)
2-0   Woobens Pacius (25)
     2-1   Michee Ngalina (45)
---------------------------------------
3-1   Alex Mndez (56)
     3-2   Michee Ngalina (90)
Hartford A. + - - 2-1
25 Oct 25 Tampa Bay 1:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Isaiah LeFlore (58)
1-1   Woobens Pacius (81)
Detroit City - - - 0-0
















Comparison with league average


Tampa Bay (30 matches) vs league average

(overall)Tampa Bay League AVG
Points per game  1.13 1.37
% Wins  30% 37%
% Draws  23% 26%
% Defeats  47% 37%
Goals scored per game  1.43 1.35
Goals conceded per game  1.67 1.35
% Clean sheets  7% 27%
% Failed To Score  23% 27%
% Won To Nil  7% 19%
% Lost To Nil  23% 19%
% Team scored first  30% 46%
% Opponent scored first  70% 46%
Average minute scored first  34 31
Average minute conceded first  37 31
Lead-defending rate  53% 58%
Equalizing rate  44% 42%
% Time leading  17% 25%
% Time level in goals  48% 49%
% Time trailing  35% 25%
PPG when scored first  1.67 2.17
PPG when conceded first  0.90 0.62
Total goals per game  3.10 2.70
% over 1.5 goals  87% 73%
% over 2.5 goals  70% 51%
% over 3.5 goals  37% 29%
% both teams scored  70% 54%

Tampa Bay at home (15 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Tampa Bay League AVG
Points per game  1.33 1.59
% Wins  33% 44%
% Draws  33% 26%
% Defeats  33% 29%
Goals scored per game  1.73 1.51
Goals conceded per game  1.73 1.19
% Clean sheets  7% 31%
% Failed To Score  13% 22%
% Won To Nil  7% 23%
% Lost To Nil  13% 15%
% Team scored first  33% 51%
% Opponent scored first  67% 41%
Average minute scored first  27 31
Average minute conceded first  38 32
Lead-defending rate  50% 64%
Equalizing rate  58% 49%
% Time leading  21% 30%
% Time level in goals  50% 49%
% Time trailing  29% 21%
PPG when scored first  1.60 2.33
PPG when conceded first  1.20 0.77
Total goals per game  3.47 2.70
% over 1.5 goals  100% 73%
% over 2.5 goals  80% 51%
% over 3.5 goals  47% 29%
% both teams scored  80% 54%

Tampa Bay away (15 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Tampa Bay League AVG
Points per game  0.93 1.15
% Wins  27% 29%
% Draws  13% 26%
% Defeats  60% 44%
Goals scored per game  1.13 1.19
Goals conceded per game  1.60 1.51
% Clean sheets  7% 22%
% Failed To Score  33% 31%
% Won To Nil  7% 15%
% Lost To Nil  33% 23%
% Team scored first  27% 41%
% Opponent scored first  73% 51%
Average minute scored first  44 32
Average minute conceded first  35 31
Lead-defending rate  57% 51%
Equalizing rate  31% 36%
% Time leading  14% 21%
% Time level in goals  46% 49%
% Time trailing  40% 30%
PPG when scored first  1.75 1.98
PPG when conceded first  0.64 0.50
Total goals per game  2.73 2.70
% over 1.5 goals  73% 73%
% over 2.5 goals  60% 51%
% over 3.5 goals  27% 29%
% both teams scored  60% 54%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Tampa Bay
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 9 / 30 30%
  Opponent scored first 21 / 30 70%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 5 / 30 17%
  Opponent was leading at HT 14 / 30 47%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 15.7 min. 17%
  Average minutes level in goals 43.2 min. 48%
  Average minutes trailing 31.1 min. 35%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Tampa Bay have been in the lead for an average duration of 15.7 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 31.1 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Tampa Bay
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 30

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 17
  Equalizer goals conceded 8
  Lead defending rate * (1) 53%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 25
  Equalizer goals scored 11
  Equalizing rate * (2) 44%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 15
  Non-crucial goals conceded 17

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Tampa Bay have taken the lead 17 times and have conceded an equalizer on 8 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 53% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 47%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 25 times that Tampa Bay's opponents have taken the lead, Tampa Bay have managed to score an equalizer on 11 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 44%.


 flag Tampa Bay
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 5 / 15 33%
  Opponent scored first 10 / 15 67%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 4 / 15 27%
  Opponent was leading at HT 6 / 15 40%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 18.8 min. 21%
  Average minutes level in goals 44.7 min. 50%
  Average minutes trailing 26.5 min. 29%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Tampa Bay have been in the lead for an average duration of 18.8 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 26.5 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Tampa Bay
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 15

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 10
  Equalizer goals conceded 5
  Lead defending rate * (1) 50%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 12
  Equalizer goals scored 7
  Equalizing rate * (2) 58%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 9
  Non-crucial goals conceded 9

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Tampa Bay have taken the lead 10 times and have conceded an equalizer on 5 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 12 times that Tampa Bay's opponents have taken the lead when Tampa Bay were playing at home, Tampa Bay have managed to score an equalizer on 7 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 58%.



 flag Tampa Bay
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 4 / 15 27%
  Opponent scored first 11 / 15 73%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 1 / 15 7%
  Opponent was leading at HT 8 / 15 53%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 12.6 min. 14%
  Average minutes level in goals 41.7 min. 46%
  Average minutes trailing 35.7 min. 40%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Tampa Bay have been in the lead for an average duration of 12.6 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 35.7 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Tampa Bay
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 15

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 7
  Equalizer goals conceded 3
  Lead defending rate * (1) 57%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 13
  Equalizer goals scored 4
  Equalizing rate * (2) 31%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 6
  Non-crucial goals conceded 8

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Tampa Bay have taken the lead 7 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 57% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 43%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 13 times that Tampa Bay's opponents have taken the lead when Tampa Bay were playing away, Tampa Bay have managed to score an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 31%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Louisville City 30 73 1:2 2:1 h2h
2 Charleston 30 62 1:3 2:1 h2h
3 FC Tulsa 30 57   1:0 h2h
4 Sacramento R. 30 48 0:2   h2h
5 New Mexico 30 48     h2h
6 North Carolina 30 45 2:2 2:1 h2h
7 Hartford A. 30 44 3:2 0:1 h2h
8 Pittsburgh 30 44 2:1 2:1 h2h
9 Loudoun Utd 30 42 1:2 2:2 h2h
10 El Paso 30 41     h2h
11 San Antonio 30 40   1:0 h2h
12 Phoenix Rising 30 40 1:1   h2h
13 Orange County 30 39     h2h
14 Rhode Island 30 38 0:3 5:0 h2h
15 Detroit City 30 37 1:1 2:0 h2h
16 Colorado S. 30 37 3:3   h2h
17 Lexington 30 36   1:1 h2h
18 Indy Eleven 30 35 3:1 1:3 h2h
19 Tampa Bay 30 34
20 Oakland Roots 30 32     h2h
21 Miami FC 30 30 2:1 1:2 h2h
22 Monterey Bay 30 29 4:0   h2h
23 Birmingham L. 30 27 2:2 1:4 h2h
24 Las Vegas L. 30 27   1:0 h2h

Tampa Bay stats rank the team in 19th position in the the league table with 34 points, 1 point behind Indy Eleven and 2 points above Oakland Roots.








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 26 1743
GF per match 1.731.13 1.43
Goals conceded (GA) 262450
GA per match 1.731.60 1.67
GF + GA per match 3.472.733.10
GF+GA over 0.5 100%100%100%
GF+GA over 1.5 100%73%87%
GF+GA over 2.5 80%60%70%
GF+GA over 3.5 47%27%37%
GF+GA over 4.5 13%13%13%
GF+GA over 5.5 7%0%3%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 73%67%70%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 27%47%37%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 20%33%27%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 7%7%7%
Won-to-nil 7%7%7%
Failed to score 13%33%23%
Lost-to-nil 13%33%23%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 87%67%77%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 33%33%33%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 80%40%60%
Scored in both halves 27%7%17%
Both teams scored 80%60%70%
Conceding Rate 93%93%93%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 60%67%63%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 67%40%53%
Conceded in both halves 33%13%23%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 87%67%77%
GF over 1.5 53%27%40%
GF over 2.5 27%13%20%
GF over 3.5 7%7%7%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 93%93%93%
GA over 1.5 60%47%53%
GA over 2.5 20%7%13%
GA over 3.5 0%7%3%
GA over 4.5 0%7%3%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Tampa Bay matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 0%0%0%
Match total goals = 1 0%27%13%
Match total goals = 2 20%13%17%
Match total goals = 3 33%33%33%
Match total goals = 4 33%13%23%
Match total goals = 5+ 13%13%13%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 0%27%13%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 53%47%50%
Match total goals = 4+ 47%27%37%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  31 01
Away wins  21 10
Home & Away wins  52 11
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  22 10
Away defeats  71 01
Home & Away defeats  93 11

A majority of Tampa Bay's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (5 wins), while 4 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more.

A majority of Tampa Bay's defeats had a one-goal margin (9 defeats), while 5 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 59%
41%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.33
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)0.93
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 60%
40%
  % Goals conceded 52%
48%
  League average 56%
44%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 41 5  17%
Drawing at HT 56 11  37%
Losing at HT 68 14  47%
  Total 151530







Goal times


 flag Tampa Bay
(regular season) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 3
GA 8
16-30 GF 5
GA 8
31-45 GF 6
GA 12
46-60 GF 5
GA 2
61-75 GF 11
GA 10
76-90 GF 13
GA 10
1st Half GF 14
33%
GA 28
56%
2nd Half GF 29
67%
GA 22
44%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 59
 Avg. minute goals conceded 49


  Tampa Bay
(regular season) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 2
GA 3
16-30 GF 4
GA 4
31-45 GF 2
GA 5
46-60 GF 3
GA 2
61-75 GF 7
GA 6
76-90 GF 8
GA 6
1st Half GF 8
31%
GA 12
46%
2nd Half GF 18
69%
GA 14
54%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 59
  Avg. minute goals conceded 53


  Tampa Bay
(regular season) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 1
GA 5
16-30 GF 1
GA 4
31-45 GF 4
GA 7
46-60 GF 2
GA 0
61-75 GF 4
GA 4
76-90 GF 5
GA 4
1st Half GF 6
35%
GA 16
67%
2nd Half GF 11
65%
GA 8
33%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 59
  Avg. minute goals conceded 45








Tampa Bay scores

FT at home
2-2 2 13%
1-2 2 13%
2-1 2 13%
1-1 2 13%
3-3 1 7%
1-3 1 7%
0-3 1 7%
3-2 1 7%
0-2 1 7%
3-1 1 7%
4-0 1 7%
FT away
2-1 4 27%
1-0 3 20%
5-0 1 7%
1-4 1 7%
1-3 1 7%
2-2 1 7%
1-2 1 7%
1-1 1 7%
0-1 1 7%
2-0 1 7%
The Tampa Bay score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 2-1 so far (4 times).
Half-time at home
0-1 5 33%
0-0 4 27%
1-0 2 13%
0-3 1 7%
3-2 1 7%
2-1 1 7%
1-1 1 7%
Half-time away
0-0 5 33%
2-1 3 20%
1-0 3 20%
1-2 1 7%
1-1 1 7%
3-0 1 7%
2-0 1 7%









Tables overview

Points

GP pts
Louisville C. 30 73
Charleston 30 62
FC Tulsa 30 57
Sacramento R. 30 48
New Mexico 30 48
North Caroli. 30 45
Hartford A. 30 44
Pittsburgh 30 44
Loudoun Utd 30 42
El Paso 30 41
San Antonio 30 40
Phoenix Risi. 30 40
Orange County 30 39
Rhode Island 30 38
Detroit City 30 37
Colorado S. 30 37
Lexington 30 36
Indy Eleven 30 35
Tampa Bay 30 34
Oakland Roots 30 32
Miami FC 30 30
Monterey Bay 30 29
Birmingham L. 30 27
Las Vegas L. 30 27

Form (last 8)

GP pts
Louisville C. 8 22
Pittsburgh 8 16
Charleston 8 15
FC Tulsa 8 15
Hartford A. 8 15
New Mexico 8 15
Rhode Island 8 14
Tampa Bay 8 13
North Caroli. 8 12
Phoenix Risi. 8 11
Sacramento R. 8 11
San Antonio 8 10
Miami FC 8 10
Orange County 8 10
El Paso 8 9
Indy Eleven 8 9
Oakland Roots 8 8
Detroit City 8 8
Loudoun Utd 8 8
Lexington 8 8
Colorado S. 8 7
Birmingham L. 8 6
Monterey Bay 8 5
Las Vegas L. 8 4

Home

GP pts
Louisville C. 15 39
Charleston 15 38
FC Tulsa 15 33
Orange County 15 29
Pittsburgh 15 28
North Caroli. 15 27
Sacramento R. 15 25
New Mexico 15 25
Lexington 15 24
Loudoun Utd 15 24
Indy Eleven 15 24
El Paso 15 23
San Antonio 15 23
Rhode Island 15 23
Colorado S. 15 23
Detroit City 15 22
Monterey Bay 15 22
Hartford A. 15 21
Tampa Bay 15 20
Phoenix Risi. 15 19
Las Vegas L. 15 19
Miami FC 15 15
Oakland Roots 15 15
Birmingham L. 15 11

Away

GP pts
Louisville C. 15 34
FC Tulsa 15 24
Charleston 15 24
Sacramento R. 15 23
Hartford A. 15 23
New Mexico 15 23
Phoenix Risi. 15 21
North Caroli. 15 18
Loudoun Utd 15 18
El Paso 15 18
Oakland Roots 15 17
San Antonio 15 17
Pittsburgh 15 16
Birmingham L. 15 16
Rhode Island 15 15
Detroit City 15 15
Miami FC 15 15
Tampa Bay 15 14
Colorado S. 15 14
Lexington 15 12
Indy Eleven 15 11
Orange County 15 10
Las Vegas L. 15 8
Monterey Bay 15 7

Offence

GP GF
Charleston 30 62
Louisville C. 30 56
FC Tulsa 30 50
Hartford A. 30 48
Phoenix Risi. 30 48
El Paso 30 47
Loudoun Utd 30 45
New Mexico 30 45
Indy Eleven 30 44
Orange County 30 44
Sacramento R. 30 44
Tampa Bay 30 43
Oakland Roots 30 42
North Caroli. 30 40
San Antonio 30 39
Birmingham L. 30 36
Colorado S. 30 35
Detroit City 30 33
Pittsburgh 30 32
Lexington 30 31
Miami FC 30 29
Rhode Island 30 29
Monterey Bay 30 27
Las Vegas L. 30 23

Defence

GP GA
Louisville C. 30 19
Sacramento R. 30 27
Pittsburgh 30 28
Rhode Island 30 29
FC Tulsa 30 30
Charleston 30 32
Detroit City 30 35
Hartford A. 30 36
San Antonio 30 38
North Caroli. 30 39
New Mexico 30 41
Lexington 30 42
Miami FC 30 44
Orange County 30 45
Monterey Bay 30 45
El Paso 30 45
Colorado S. 30 47
Phoenix Risi. 30 48
Loudoun Utd 30 48
Tampa Bay 30 50
Las Vegas L. 30 50
Birmingham L. 30 50
Oakland Roots 30 52
Indy Eleven 30 52


 

SoccerSTATS.com - Public edition

SoccerSTATS.com provides football statistics, results and blog articles on national and international soccer competitions worldwide. Football fans can keep a tab on stats related to their favourite team or leagues of interest, and access a wide range of team performance data analytics and league standings, not only on the world's most famous professional leagues, but also on amateur and regional leagues over the world. Example of soccer statistics include league standings, form tables, top goal scorers, scoring stats, statistical previews and goal timing statistics.
Follow us on Twitter
F.A.Q. Contact Privacy Policy Do Not Sell My Information
Terms & conditions of use About us Cookie usage and options Membership information
Mobile app
To our loyal users: PLEASE SUPPORT US

Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. Products, services, promotional offers and other offerings from partners and advertisers are subject to terms and conditions. By using this website you certify that you agree with the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy and that you are over the age of 18 or that you have the permission of a parent or guardian to use this website, after your parent or guardian has carefully reviewed and agreed to the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy. The website's content is provided for informational purposes only is not to be relied upon as a professional opinion whatsover. Nothing on this website should be considered as advice. This website is not associated with nor endorsed by any league or competition (whether professional, collegiate or other types of leagues / competitions), federation, association, club or team. All trademarks, brands, images, logos and names appearing on this website belong to their respective owners.
Useful links (third-party websites):   www.gamcare.org.uk       www.begambleaware.org        gamblingtherapy.org
 
   
Copyright 1998-2026 SoccerSTATS.com
back to top