advertisement
advertisement
|
|
|
0 - 1
|
Denzel Dumfries (16)
|
| FT: 0-1 |
|
| Lead durations in 90 minutes of regular time |
|
|
| FC Groningen lead duration |
|
| Level score duration |
16 min
|
| PSV Eindhoven lead duration |
74 min
|
|
|
Note: to calculate the above duration values based on a total of 90 minutes, goals scored on
the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are considered scored on the 45th minute,
and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are considered scored on the 90th minute.
|
Lead durations tables
|
|
|
|
|
|
Result analysis (post-match data) - How often has this happened for each team this season?
|
|
FC Groningen after 26 league matches
|
PSV Eindhoven after 26 league matches
|
| lost |
11/26 |
|
42%
|
| lost by a 1-goal margin |
7/26 |
|
27%
|
| did not score |
8/26 |
|
31%
|
| conceded at least 1 goal |
17/26 |
|
65%
|
| conceded exactly 1 goal |
11/26 |
|
42%
|
| conceded the first goal |
13/26 |
|
50%
|
| conceded the first goal and lost |
11/26 |
|
42%
|
| trailing at halftime |
7/26 |
|
27%
|
| trailing at halftime and lost |
5/26 |
|
19%
|
| conceded in 1st half |
9/26 |
|
35%
|
| no goal conceded in 2nd half |
14/26 |
|
54%
|
|
| won |
14/26 |
|
54%
|
| won by a 1-goal margin |
3/26 |
|
12%
|
| scored |
23/26 |
|
88%
|
| scored exactly 1 goal |
9/26 |
|
35%
|
| no goal conceded |
7/26 |
|
27%
|
| scored first |
12/26 |
|
46%
|
| scored first and won |
10/26 |
|
38%
|
| leading at halftime |
11/26 |
|
42%
|
| leading at halftime and won |
10/26 |
|
38%
|
| scored in 1st half |
12/26 |
|
46%
|
| no goal conceded in 1st half |
16/26 |
|
62%
|
| no goal conceded in 2nd half |
13/26 |
|
50%
|
|
|
The table above features a summary of match outcome and events in the context of each team's seasonal stats in the league.
For example, this is PSV Eindhoven's 14th win of the season, and out of a total of 26 league matches played so far, their winning percentage is now 54%.
|
|
The table below shows some of the main league-level statistics
in relation with the match result, and how often each instance has been observed so far this season in the league.
For example, the match ended in an away win, and the total number of away wins all teams combined this season is now 63, representing 27% of the 232 league matches played so far.
|
|
All teams combined out of a total of 232 matches this season in the league
|
| Away team won |
63/232 |
|
27%
|
| Away team won by a 1-goal margin |
29/232 |
|
12%
|
| Away team scored |
154/232 |
|
66%
|
| Away team scored exactly 1 goal |
79/232 |
|
34%
|
| Away team no goal conceded |
42/232 |
|
18%
|
| Away team scored first |
94/232 |
|
41%
|
| Away team scored first and won |
50/232 |
|
22%
|
| Away team leading at halftime |
62/232 |
|
27%
|
| Away team leading at halftime and won |
41/232 |
|
18%
|
|
Search league results
|
| Outcome Surprise-Level relative to pre-match PPG |
| Points Per Game (before the match) |
| FC Groningen at home |
PSV Eindhoven away |
Total |
| 1.83 | 1.46 |
3.29 |
| Outcome |
Outcome Surprise-Level |
| (any scoreline) |
(Losing team PPG / Total) * 100 |
| Away win |
|
55.6 |
| Scale: from 0 (less surprising) to 100 (more surprising) |
|
Latest matches' outcome surprise-levels
| Outcome | Outcome Surprise-Level | |
|---|
| 8 Mar |
FC Utrecht - Sparta |
5 - 1 |
Home win |
|
28.2 |
analysis
|
| 8 Mar |
Feyenoord - Willem II |
2 - 0 |
Home win |
|
41.3 |
analysis
|
| 8 Mar |
Heracles Almelo - RKC Waalwijk |
4 - 2 |
Home win |
|
15.4 |
analysis
|
| 8 Mar |
FC Groningen - PSV Eindhoven |
0 - 1 |
Away win |
|
55.6 |
analysis
|
| 7 Mar |
AZ Alkmaar - ADO Den Haag |
4 - 0 |
Home win |
|
20.0 |
analysis
|
| 7 Mar |
FC Emmen - VVV |
3 - 0 |
Home win |
|
27.8 |
analysis
|
| 7 Mar |
Vitesse Arnhem - FC Twente |
1 - 0 |
Home win |
|
30.0 |
analysis
|
| 7 Mar |
Heerenveen - Ajax Amsterdam |
1 - 3 |
Away win |
|
41.8 |
analysis
|
| 6 Mar |
Fortuna Sittard - PEC Zwolle |
1 - 1 |
Draw |
|
48.0 |
analysis
|
| Scale: from 0 (less surprising) to 100 (more surprising) |
Details on the calculation of the Outcome surprise-level are outlined in the following blog article:
Evaluating surprising results |
