China - League One

Visual table

		GP	Pts
1	Liaoning Tieren	12	29

2	Chongqing T.	12	28

3	Guangdong GZP	11	22

4	S. Gongfu	11	20

5	Nantong Zhiyun	12	18

6	Yanbian Longdin	12	18

7	Suzhou Dongwu	11	17

8	Dalian Kuncheng	12	16

9	Shaanxi Union	11	14

10	Shanghai Jiadin	12	14

11	Nanjing City	11	12

12	Shenzhen J.	11	12

13	Foshan Nanshi	12	10

14	Heilongjiang IC	11	9

15	Qingdao RL	11	7

16	Guangxi Baoyun	12	6

Performance Rating

		GP	W	D	L	Pts	pPts	Team pPPG	Opponents pPPG
1	Liaoning Tieren	12	9	2	1	29	10.0	83%	39% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (A) at Guangxi Baoyun (pPPG at home = 14%) (A) at Chongqing T. (pPPG at home = 79%) (H) vs Yanbian Longdin (pPPG away = 21%) (A) at Guangdong GZP (pPPG at home = 60%) (H) vs Shenzhen J. (pPPG away = 0%) (A) at Qingdao RL (pPPG at home = 20%) (H) vs Shaanxi Union (pPPG away = 25%) (H) vs Dalian Kuncheng (pPPG away = 33%) (A) at Heilongjiang IC (pPPG at home = 50%) (A) at Suzhou Dongwu (pPPG at home = 70%) (H) vs S. Gongfu (pPPG away = 75%) (H) vs Shanghai Jiadin (pPPG away = 25%)	61.2%
2	Chongqing T.	12	8	4	0	28	10.0	83%	42% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (H) vs Qingdao RL (pPPG away = 33%) (H) vs Liaoning Tieren (pPPG away = 67%) (A) at Shenzhen J. (pPPG at home = 80%) (H) vs Shaanxi Union (pPPG away = 25%) (A) at Nantong Zhiyun (pPPG at home = 58%) (A) at Nanjing City (pPPG at home = 33%) (H) vs Heilongjiang IC (pPPG away = 20%) (A) at Guangdong GZP (pPPG at home = 60%) (H) vs Yanbian Longdin (pPPG away = 21%) (H) vs Guangxi Baoyun (pPPG away = 30%) (A) at Foshan Nanshi (pPPG at home = 43%) (H) vs Dalian Kuncheng (pPPG away = 33%)	62.7%
3	Guangdong GZP	11	7	1	3	22	7.5	68%	47% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (H) vs Yanbian Longdin (pPPG away = 21%) (A) at Dalian Kuncheng (pPPG at home = 67%) (A) at Heilongjiang IC (pPPG at home = 50%) (H) vs Liaoning Tieren (pPPG away = 67%) (A) at Guangxi Baoyun (pPPG at home = 14%) (H) vs Foshan Nanshi (pPPG away = 20%) (A) at S. Gongfu (pPPG at home = 50%) (H) vs Chongqing T. (pPPG away = 90%) (H) vs Shanghai Jiadin (pPPG away = 25%) (A) at Shenzhen J. (pPPG at home = 80%) (A) at Nanjing City (pPPG at home = 33%)	57.6%
4	S. Gongfu	11	6	2	3	20	7.0	64%	53% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (A) at Heilongjiang IC (pPPG at home = 50%) (A) at Nantong Zhiyun (pPPG at home = 58%) (A) at Shanghai Jiadin (pPPG at home = 58%) (H) vs Yanbian Longdin (pPPG away = 21%) (H) vs Suzhou Dongwu (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Shaanxi Union (pPPG at home = 70%) (H) vs Guangdong GZP (pPPG away = 75%) (A) at Guangxi Baoyun (pPPG at home = 14%) (H) vs Qingdao RL (pPPG away = 33%) (H) vs Nanjing City (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Liaoning Tieren (pPPG at home = 100%)	58.3%
5	Nantong Zhiyun	12	5	3	4	18	6.5	54%	42% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (H) vs Shanghai Jiadin (pPPG away = 25%) (H) vs S. Gongfu (pPPG away = 75%) (A) at Nanjing City (pPPG at home = 33%) (H) vs Foshan Nanshi (pPPG away = 20%) (H) vs Chongqing T. (pPPG away = 90%) (A) at Dalian Kuncheng (pPPG at home = 67%) (A) at Suzhou Dongwu (pPPG at home = 70%) (H) vs Shenzhen J. (pPPG away = 0%) (A) at Shaanxi Union (pPPG at home = 70%) (A) at Qingdao RL (pPPG at home = 20%) (H) vs Heilongjiang IC (pPPG away = 20%) (A) at Guangxi Baoyun (pPPG at home = 14%)	48.1%
6	Yanbian Longdin	12	5	3	4	18	6.5	54%	45% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (A) at Guangdong GZP (pPPG at home = 60%) (A) at Qingdao RL (pPPG at home = 20%) (A) at Liaoning Tieren (pPPG at home = 100%) (A) at S. Gongfu (pPPG at home = 50%) (H) vs Dalian Kuncheng (pPPG away = 33%) (H) vs Shenzhen J. (pPPG away = 0%) (A) at Shanghai Jiadin (pPPG at home = 58%) (H) vs Shaanxi Union (pPPG away = 25%) (A) at Chongqing T. (pPPG at home = 79%) (H) vs Heilongjiang IC (pPPG away = 20%) (H) vs Suzhou Dongwu (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Foshan Nanshi (pPPG at home = 43%)	49.6%
7	Suzhou Dongwu	11	4	5	2	17	6.5	59%	46% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (H) vs Shaanxi Union (pPPG away = 25%) (A) at Foshan Nanshi (pPPG at home = 43%) (H) vs Guangxi Baoyun (pPPG away = 30%) (A) at Dalian Kuncheng (pPPG at home = 67%) (A) at S. Gongfu (pPPG at home = 50%) (H) vs Shanghai Jiadin (pPPG away = 25%) (H) vs Nantong Zhiyun (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Qingdao RL (pPPG at home = 20%) (A) at Nanjing City (pPPG at home = 33%) (H) vs Liaoning Tieren (pPPG away = 67%) (A) at Yanbian Longdin (pPPG at home = 100%)	52.5%
8	Dalian Kuncheng	12	4	4	4	16	6.0	50%	51% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (A) at Nanjing City (pPPG at home = 33%) (H) vs Guangdong GZP (pPPG away = 75%) (A) at Qingdao RL (pPPG at home = 20%) (H) vs Suzhou Dongwu (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Yanbian Longdin (pPPG at home = 100%) (H) vs Nantong Zhiyun (pPPG away = 50%) (H) vs Guangxi Baoyun (pPPG away = 30%) (A) at Liaoning Tieren (pPPG at home = 100%) (H) vs Shenzhen J. (pPPG away = 0%) (H) vs Foshan Nanshi (pPPG away = 20%) (A) at Shanghai Jiadin (pPPG at home = 58%) (A) at Chongqing T. (pPPG at home = 79%)	50.5%
9	Shaanxi Union	11	4	2	5	14	5.0	45%	59% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (A) at Suzhou Dongwu (pPPG at home = 70%) (H) vs Heilongjiang IC (pPPG away = 20%) (A) at Foshan Nanshi (pPPG at home = 43%) (A) at Chongqing T. (pPPG at home = 79%) (H) vs Nanjing City (pPPG away = 50%) (H) vs S. Gongfu (pPPG away = 75%) (A) at Liaoning Tieren (pPPG at home = 100%) (A) at Yanbian Longdin (pPPG at home = 100%) (H) vs Nantong Zhiyun (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Shanghai Jiadin (pPPG at home = 58%) (H) vs Shenzhen J. (pPPG away = 0%)	52.2%
10	Shanghai Jiadin	12	4	2	6	14	5.0	42%	47% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (A) at Nantong Zhiyun (pPPG at home = 58%) (H) vs Shenzhen J. (pPPG away = 0%) (H) vs S. Gongfu (pPPG away = 75%) (A) at Nanjing City (pPPG at home = 33%) (H) vs Qingdao RL (pPPG away = 33%) (A) at Suzhou Dongwu (pPPG at home = 70%) (H) vs Yanbian Longdin (pPPG away = 21%) (A) at Heilongjiang IC (pPPG at home = 50%) (A) at Guangdong GZP (pPPG at home = 60%) (H) vs Shaanxi Union (pPPG away = 25%) (H) vs Dalian Kuncheng (pPPG away = 33%) (A) at Liaoning Tieren (pPPG at home = 100%)	44.3%
11	Nanjing City	11	3	3	5	12	4.5	41%	53% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (H) vs Dalian Kuncheng (pPPG away = 33%) (A) at Guangxi Baoyun (pPPG at home = 14%) (H) vs Nantong Zhiyun (pPPG away = 50%) (H) vs Shanghai Jiadin (pPPG away = 25%) (A) at Shaanxi Union (pPPG at home = 70%) (H) vs Chongqing T. (pPPG away = 90%) (A) at Shenzhen J. (pPPG at home = 80%) (A) at Foshan Nanshi (pPPG at home = 43%) (H) vs Suzhou Dongwu (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at S. Gongfu (pPPG at home = 50%) (H) vs Guangdong GZP (pPPG away = 75%)	47.0%
12	Shenzhen J.	11	4	0	7	12	4.0	36%	65% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (H) vs Foshan Nanshi (pPPG away = 20%) (A) at Shanghai Jiadin (pPPG at home = 58%) (H) vs Chongqing T. (pPPG away = 90%) (H) vs Guangxi Baoyun (pPPG away = 30%) (A) at Liaoning Tieren (pPPG at home = 100%) (A) at Yanbian Longdin (pPPG at home = 100%) (H) vs Nanjing City (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Nantong Zhiyun (pPPG at home = 58%) (A) at Dalian Kuncheng (pPPG at home = 67%) (H) vs Guangdong GZP (pPPG away = 75%) (A) at Shaanxi Union (pPPG at home = 70%)	50.7%
13	Foshan Nanshi	12	2	4	6	10	4.0	33%	47% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (A) at Shenzhen J. (pPPG at home = 80%) (H) vs Suzhou Dongwu (pPPG away = 50%) (H) vs Shaanxi Union (pPPG away = 25%) (A) at Nantong Zhiyun (pPPG at home = 58%) (H) vs Heilongjiang IC (pPPG away = 20%) (A) at Guangdong GZP (pPPG at home = 60%) (H) vs Qingdao RL (pPPG away = 33%) (H) vs Nanjing City (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Guangxi Baoyun (pPPG at home = 14%) (A) at Dalian Kuncheng (pPPG at home = 67%) (H) vs Chongqing T. (pPPG away = 90%) (H) vs Yanbian Longdin (pPPG away = 21%)	40.2%
14	Heilongjiang IC	11	1	6	4	9	4.0	36%	60% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (H) vs S. Gongfu (pPPG away = 75%) (A) at Shaanxi Union (pPPG at home = 70%) (H) vs Guangdong GZP (pPPG away = 75%) (H) vs Qingdao RL (pPPG away = 33%) (A) at Foshan Nanshi (pPPG at home = 43%) (H) vs Guangxi Baoyun (pPPG away = 30%) (A) at Chongqing T. (pPPG at home = 79%) (H) vs Shanghai Jiadin (pPPG away = 25%) (H) vs Liaoning Tieren (pPPG away = 67%) (A) at Yanbian Longdin (pPPG at home = 100%) (A) at Nantong Zhiyun (pPPG at home = 58%)	48.2%
15	Qingdao RL	11	1	4	6	7	3.0	27%	47% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (A) at Chongqing T. (pPPG at home = 79%) (H) vs Yanbian Longdin (pPPG away = 21%) (H) vs Dalian Kuncheng (pPPG away = 33%) (A) at Heilongjiang IC (pPPG at home = 50%) (A) at Shanghai Jiadin (pPPG at home = 58%) (H) vs Liaoning Tieren (pPPG away = 67%) (A) at Foshan Nanshi (pPPG at home = 43%) (H) vs Suzhou Dongwu (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at S. Gongfu (pPPG at home = 50%) (H) vs Nantong Zhiyun (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Guangxi Baoyun (pPPG at home = 14%)	37.1%
16	Guangxi Baoyun	12	1	3	8	6	2.5	21%	60% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (H) vs Liaoning Tieren (pPPG away = 67%) (H) vs Nanjing City (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Suzhou Dongwu (pPPG at home = 70%) (A) at Shenzhen J. (pPPG at home = 80%) (H) vs Guangdong GZP (pPPG away = 75%) (A) at Heilongjiang IC (pPPG at home = 50%) (A) at Dalian Kuncheng (pPPG at home = 67%) (H) vs S. Gongfu (pPPG away = 75%) (H) vs Foshan Nanshi (pPPG away = 20%) (A) at Chongqing T. (pPPG at home = 79%) (H) vs Qingdao RL (pPPG away = 33%) (H) vs Nantong Zhiyun (pPPG away = 50%)	40.4%
pPts: Performance Points (Win = 1 point \| Draw = 0.5 point \| Defeat = 0 point)
pPPG: Performance Points Per Game (Performance Points relative to total matches played by the team)
Opponents pPPG are calculated based on: - Home pPPG of opponents faced away - Away pPPG of opponents faced at home

More information about the details of each opponent pPPG value is visible by hovering the mouse cursor over any of the 'Opponents pPPG' values.

What is the difference between the Points Performance Index and the Performance Rating?

The Points Performance Index (PPI) is based on Points Per Game. Its goal is to mesure the team's capacity to pick up points in the league table. This is a points-centric indicator.

The Performance Rating is based on what we call Performance Points (pPts). Unlike typical Points, where a draw is rewarded at one third of a win, Performance Points are calculated so as to value a draw as half a win.

The typical 3-1-0 point system provides a clear incentive for teams to aim for the win. In the past, the old 2-1-0 system could cause some teams to aim too often for a draw, which could cause some games to become less interesting to watch, especially from a neutral spectator's perspective.

However calculating 'Performance Points' on the base of 1 point for a win, 0.5 point for a draw and 0 point for a defeat allows to take a different look at team performance, as illustrated in the following example:

Let's assume Team A and Team B have each played 10 games.

Team A has the following record: 5 Wins, 0 Draw, 5 Defeats (Total: 15 points | 5 performance points)

Team B has the following record: 2 Wins, 8 Draws, 0 Defeat (Total: 14 points | 6 performance points)

So Team A has been more effective at picking up points than Team B therefore if both teams were to repeat those exact result patterns until the end of the season, Team A will logically finish the season above Team B in the league table.

Now when it comes to analysing performance, one could argue that a team like Team B, that has remained undefeated, winning twice, should not necessarily be considered as having demonstrated a weaker performance than a team that lost half of their matches, as Team A did.

With the classic points system, Team A has a PPG (Points Per Game) of 1.5 and Team B has a lower PPG: 1.4.

With the Performance Points system, Team A has a pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of 50% and Team B has a higher pPPG: 60%.

How is the Performance Rating calculated?

The Performance Rating (PR) is calculated based on the team's Performance Points Per Game (pPPG) and the pPPG of the opponents already played by the team. It is the average of those two values.

Using the same logic as with the Points Performance Index, the Opponents pPPG value is calculated by taking into account the Away pPPG of opponents played at home and the Home pPPG of opponents played away.

Tables overview

League table
		GP	pts
	Liaoning Tie.	12	29
	Chongqing T.	12	28
	Guangdong GZP	11	22
	S. Gongfu	11	20
	Nantong Zhiyun	12	18
	Yanbian Long.	12	18
	Suzhou Dongwu	11	17
	Dalian Kunch.	12	16
	Shaanxi Union	11	14
	Shanghai Jia.	12	14
	Nanjing City	11	12
	Shenzhen J.	11	12
	Foshan Nanshi	12	10
	Heilongjiang.	11	9
	Qingdao RL	11	7
	Guangxi Baoyun	12	6

Form table (last 8)
		GP	pts
	Liaoning Tie.	8	20
	Chongqing T.	8	18
	Yanbian Long.	8	17
	Guangdong GZP	8	15
	S. Gongfu	8	13
	Suzhou Dongwu	8	12
	Nantong Zhiyun	8	11
	Dalian Kunch.	8	11
	Shaanxi Union	8	10
	Shanghai Jia.	8	10
	Shenzhen J.	8	9
	Nanjing City	8	8
	Heilongjiang.	8	7
	Foshan Nanshi	8	7
	Guangxi Baoyun	8	5
	Qingdao RL	8	4

Home
		GP	pts
	Liaoning Tie.	6	18
	Yanbian Long.	5	15
	Chongqing T.	7	15
	Shenzhen J.	5	12
	Dalian Kunch.	6	11
	Nantong Zhiyun	6	10
	Shaanxi Union	5	10
	Shanghai Jia.	6	10
	Suzhou Dongwu	5	9
	Guangdong GZP	5	9
	S. Gongfu	5	7
	Heilongjiang.	6	7
	Foshan Nanshi	7	7
	Nanjing City	6	5
	Guangxi Baoyun	7	3
	Qingdao RL	5	2

Away
		GP	pts
	Chongqing T.	5	13
	S. Gongfu	6	13
	Guangdong GZP	6	13
	Liaoning Tie.	6	11
	Suzhou Dongwu	6	8
	Nantong Zhiyun	6	8
	Nanjing City	5	7
	Qingdao RL	6	5
	Dalian Kunch.	6	5
	Shaanxi Union	6	4
	Shanghai Jia.	6	4
	Guangxi Baoyun	5	3
	Foshan Nanshi	5	3
	Yanbian Long.	7	3
	Heilongjiang.	5	2
	Shenzhen J.	6	0

Offence
		GP	GF
	Liaoning Tie.	12	30
	Chongqing T.	12	23
	Guangdong GZP	11	22
	Nantong Zhiyun	12	17
	S. Gongfu	11	17
	Shaanxi Union	11	17
	Shenzhen J.	11	15
	Yanbian Long.	12	15
	Nanjing City	11	14
	Dalian Kunch.	12	12
	Heilongjiang.	11	12
	Shanghai Jia.	12	11
	Suzhou Dongwu	11	11
	Foshan Nanshi	12	9
	Guangxi Baoyun	12	7
	Qingdao RL	11	6

Defence
		GP	GA
	Suzhou Dongwu	11	6
	S. Gongfu	11	9
	Chongqing T.	12	9
	Liaoning Tie.	12	11
	Qingdao RL	11	12
	Nantong Zhiyun	12	14
	Guangdong GZP	11	14
	Yanbian Long.	12	15
	Dalian Kunch.	12	15
	Shanghai Jia.	12	16
	Shaanxi Union	11	17
	Nanjing City	11	17
	Foshan Nanshi	12	17
	Heilongjiang.	11	18
	Guangxi Baoyun	12	20
	Shenzhen J.	11	28

Segments Table

0 pt

29 pts

5th Segment	4th Segment	3rd Segment	2nd Segment	1st Segment
up to 5.4 pts	from 5.5 to 11.3 pts	from 11.4 to 17.2 pts	from 17.3 to 23.1 pts	from 23.2 to 29 pts
	(12) 10 Foshan Nanshi (11) 9 Heilongjiang IC (11) 7 Qingdao RL (12) 6 Guangxi Baoyun	(11) 17 Suzhou Dongwu (12) 16 Dalian Kuncheng (11) 14 Shaanxi Union (12) 14 Shanghai Jiadin (11) 12 Nanjing City (11) 12 Shenzhen J.	(11) 22 Guangdong GZP (11) 20 S. Gongfu (12) 18 Nantong Zhiyun (12) 18 Yanbian Longdin	(12) 29 Liaoning Tieren (12) 28 Chongqing T.

The Segments Table is a visual representation splitting the teams into 5 segments. Each team is assigned to a specific segment, depending on the team's number of points. Each of the 5 segments spans one-fifth (20%) of the total points held by the team ranked 1st in the league. For each team, the number of matches played appears in green between brackets, and the number of points is displayed in black.

China - League One stats

92 matches played / 240

38.3% completed

Home wins:	46%	Over 1.5 goals:	76%
Draws:	26%	Over 2.5 goals:	46%
Away wins:	28%	Over 3.5 goals:	22%

Goals:	238	Home goals per match:	1.42
Goals per match:	2.59	Away goals per match:	1.16
		Both teams scored:	51%

Results

Home team scored first:	50%	No goal scored:	9%	Away team scored first:	41%
Average minute when home team scored first:	32 min.			Average minute when away team scored first:	29 min.
Home team lead-defending rate:	69%			Away team lead-defending rate:	59%
Home team equalizing rate:	41%			Away team equalizing rate:	31%
Home team lead duration:	28%	Teams level in goals:	50%	Away team lead duration:	21%
Home PPG when home team scored first:	2.39			Away PPG when away team scored first:	2.03

More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 92 matches played in the league, a total of 238 goals have been scored (2.59 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including China - League One results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded.

The number of matches included in the regular season may differ depending on the way each league is structured. For most national leagues, the stats above relate to the selected league competition in the regular season, excluding playoff matches. Some leagues include additional rounds of matches, for which dedicated group tables may be featured on this page. When such group tables are displayed on the main league page, the stats above also include the matches related to those tables.

China - League One

Visual table

Tables overview

League table

Form table (last 8)

Home

Away

Offence

Defence

Segments Table

China - League One stats

Results

Tables

Analysis

Goal times