China - Super League time spent leading or trailing during matches - historical 2025

Average time spent leading, level in goals, trailing

Total Lead durations (overall) in percentage based on 90 minutes per game GP Leading Level Trailing Leading Level Trailing Beijing Guoan  30 45.9% 32.7% 21.4% Changchun Yatai  30 13.2% 46.9% 39.9% Chengdu  30 43.6% 45.3% 11.1% Dalian Yingbo  30 28.3% 41.9% 29.8% Henan SL  30 26.2% 48.6% 25.2% Meizhou Hakka  30 16.5% 35.4% 48% Qingdao Hainiu  30 17% 45.4% 37.5% Qingdao West C.  30 23.5% 49.1% 27.4% S. Shenhua  30 38.4% 43.7% 18% Shandong T.  30 38.2% 41.9% 19.9% Shanghai Port  30 54.6% 30.9% 14.5% Shenzhen P. C.  30 20.7% 39.9% 39.4% Tianjin T.  30 29.7% 38.9% 31.4% Wuhan Three T.  30 12.4% 43.3% 44.3% Yunnan Yukun  30 27.1% 44.3% 28.6% Zhejiang  30 26.4% 48.2% 25.3% League average 28.9% 42.3% 28.9% Home Lead durations (at home) in percentage based on 90 minutes per game GP Leading Level Trailing Leading Level Trailing Beijing Guoan  15 51.6% 30.9% 17.5% Changchun Yatai  15 10.3% 50.7% 39% Chengdu  15 47.5% 48.7% 3.8% Dalian Yingbo  15 28.2% 45.7% 26.1% Henan SL  15 36.9% 47.3% 15.9% Meizhou Hakka  15 17.5% 36.7% 45.8% Qingdao Hainiu  15 23.8% 46.1% 30.1% Qingdao West C.  15 38% 47.3% 14.7% S. Shenhua  15 49.1% 35.7% 15.2% Shandong T.  15 42.2% 43.3% 14.4% Shanghai Port  15 52% 36.4% 11.6% Shenzhen P. C.  15 34.8% 40.8% 24.4% Tianjin T.  15 28.4% 40.5% 31.1% Wuhan Three T.  15 18.6% 35.2% 46.2% Yunnan Yukun  15 29.8% 43% 27.3% Zhejiang  15 35.1% 48.1% 16.8% League average 34% 42.3% 23.7% Away Lead durations (away) in percentage based on 90 minutes per game GP Leading Level Trailing Leading Level Trailing Beijing Guoan  15 40.2% 34.5% 25.3% Changchun Yatai  15 16.1% 43.1% 40.7% Chengdu  15 39.7% 41.9% 18.4% Dalian Yingbo  15 28.4% 38% 33.6% Henan SL  15 15.5% 49.9% 34.6% Meizhou Hakka  15 15.6% 34.1% 50.3% Qingdao Hainiu  15 10.3% 44.8% 44.9% Qingdao West C.  15 9% 50.9% 40.1% S. Shenhua  15 27.6% 51.6% 20.7% Shandong T.  15 34.1% 40.5% 25.3% Shanghai Port  15 57.2% 25.3% 17.5% Shenzhen P. C.  15 6.6% 39% 54.4% Tianjin T.  15 31.1% 37.2% 31.7% Wuhan Three T.  15 6.1% 51.4% 42.4% Yunnan Yukun  15 24.4% 45.6% 30% Zhejiang  15 17.8% 48.4% 33.9% League average 23.7% 42.3% 34%

Note: this table shows how long each team has spent leading, level in goals, or trailing during their matches. For this table, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per match, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and all goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are considered scored on the 90th minute.

Example for a team (Team A) having played a total of 3 games:

Game 1: Team A vs Opponent B, final score 0-0 (minutes in the lead: 0, minutes played: 90)

Game 2: Team A vs Opponent C, final score 1-0, goal scored on the 88th minute (minutes in the lead: 2, minutes played: 90)

Game 3: Team A vs Opponent D, final score 1-0, goal scored on the 65th minute (minutes in the lead: 25, minutes played: 90)

The 3 games played by Team A would give the following values, regarding total minutes played and time spent in the lead:
  - Total minutes team A has been in the lead: 27
  - Total minutes played by team A: 270
  - Percentage of minutes that team A has been in the lead: 10%
  - Avg minutes per game that team A has spent leading (based on 90 min per game): 9 minutes

Some additional context information on the Lead Duration table and other related tables is provided in the Lead durations blog article.

See also:

Goal types