Norway - Division 2 - Gr. 2

Visual table

		GP	Pts
1	Strommen	16	37

2	Ull/Kisa	16	33

3	Tromsdalen	16	31

4	Eidsvold	16	30

5	Kjelsas	16	26

6	Grorud	16	26

7	Honefoss	16	25

8	Stjordals-Blink	16	25

9	Levanger	16	17

10	Rana	16	17

11	Alta	16	16

12	Follo	16	16

13	Asker	16	13

14	Strindheim	16	9

Performance Rating

		GP	W	D	L	Pts	pPts	Team pPPG	Opponents pPPG
1	Strommen	16	12	1	3	37	12.5	78%	44% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (H) vs Rana (pPPG away = 19%) (A) at Levanger (pPPG at home = 44%) (H) vs Follo (pPPG away = 17%) (A) at Alta (pPPG at home = 63%) (H) vs Eidsvold (pPPG away = 50%) (H) vs Ull/Kisa (pPPG away = 75%) (A) at Strindheim (pPPG at home = 25%) (H) vs Stjordals-Blink (pPPG away = 43%) (A) at Grorud (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Tromsdalen (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Kjelsas (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Asker (pPPG away = 19%) (A) at Honefoss (pPPG at home = 64%) (H) vs Strindheim (pPPG away = 13%) (A) at Rana (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Grorud (pPPG away = 56%)	61.1%
2	Ull/Kisa	16	10	3	3	33	11.5	72%	44% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (H) vs Eidsvold (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Honefoss (pPPG at home = 64%) (H) vs Kjelsas (pPPG away = 56%) (A) at Rana (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Levanger (pPPG away = 38%) (A) at Strommen (pPPG at home = 78%) (H) vs Alta (pPPG away = 6%) (A) at Follo (pPPG at home = 57%) (A) at Stjordals-Blink (pPPG at home = 61%) (H) vs Asker (pPPG away = 19%) (A) at Grorud (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Strindheim (pPPG away = 13%) (A) at Tromsdalen (pPPG at home = 88%) (H) vs Rana (pPPG away = 19%) (A) at Strindheim (pPPG at home = 25%) (H) vs Follo (pPPG away = 17%)	57.9%
3	Tromsdalen	16	9	4	3	31	11.0	69%	46% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (A) at Grorud (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Asker (pPPG away = 19%) (H) vs Alta (pPPG away = 6%) (A) at Honefoss (pPPG at home = 64%) (H) vs Follo (pPPG away = 17%) (A) at Kjelsas (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Eidsvold (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Rana (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Levanger (pPPG away = 38%) (A) at Strommen (pPPG at home = 78%) (H) vs Strindheim (pPPG away = 13%) (A) at Stjordals-Blink (pPPG at home = 61%) (H) vs Ull/Kisa (pPPG away = 75%) (A) at Alta (pPPG at home = 63%) (H) vs Stjordals-Blink (pPPG away = 43%) (A) at Asker (pPPG at home = 44%)	57.4%
4	Eidsvold	16	9	3	4	30	10.5	66%	48% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (A) at Ull/Kisa (pPPG at home = 69%) (H) vs Grorud (pPPG away = 56%) (A) at Asker (pPPG at home = 44%) (H) vs Strindheim (pPPG away = 13%) (A) at Strommen (pPPG at home = 78%) (H) vs Stjordals-Blink (pPPG away = 43%) (A) at Tromsdalen (pPPG at home = 88%) (H) vs Honefoss (pPPG away = 44%) (H) vs Follo (pPPG away = 17%) (A) at Rana (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Levanger (pPPG away = 38%) (A) at Kjelsas (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Alta (pPPG away = 6%) (A) at Levanger (pPPG at home = 44%) (H) vs Kjelsas (pPPG away = 56%) (A) at Stjordals-Blink (pPPG at home = 61%)	56.8%
5	Kjelsas	16	8	2	6	26	9.0	56%	49% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (A) at Strindheim (pPPG at home = 25%) (H) vs Stjordals-Blink (pPPG away = 43%) (A) at Ull/Kisa (pPPG at home = 69%) (H) vs Asker (pPPG away = 19%) (A) at Grorud (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Tromsdalen (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Honefoss (pPPG at home = 64%) (A) at Levanger (pPPG at home = 44%) (H) vs Rana (pPPG away = 19%) (A) at Alta (pPPG at home = 63%) (H) vs Strommen (pPPG away = 79%) (H) vs Eidsvold (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Follo (pPPG at home = 57%) (H) vs Honefoss (pPPG away = 44%) (A) at Eidsvold (pPPG at home = 81%) (H) vs Strindheim (pPPG away = 13%)	52.6%
6	Grorud	16	8	2	6	26	9.0	56%	50% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (H) vs Tromsdalen (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Eidsvold (pPPG at home = 81%) (H) vs Honefoss (pPPG away = 44%) (A) at Levanger (pPPG at home = 44%) (H) vs Kjelsas (pPPG away = 56%) (A) at Rana (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Follo (pPPG away = 17%) (A) at Strindheim (pPPG at home = 25%) (H) vs Strommen (pPPG away = 79%) (A) at Stjordals-Blink (pPPG at home = 61%) (H) vs Ull/Kisa (pPPG away = 75%) (A) at Alta (pPPG at home = 63%) (H) vs Asker (pPPG away = 19%) (A) at Asker (pPPG at home = 44%) (H) vs Alta (pPPG away = 6%) (A) at Strommen (pPPG at home = 78%)	53.1%
7	Honefoss	16	8	1	7	25	8.5	53%	51% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (A) at Stjordals-Blink (pPPG at home = 61%) (H) vs Ull/Kisa (pPPG away = 75%) (A) at Grorud (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Tromsdalen (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Asker (pPPG at home = 44%) (A) at Follo (pPPG at home = 57%) (H) vs Kjelsas (pPPG away = 56%) (A) at Eidsvold (pPPG at home = 81%) (H) vs Alta (pPPG away = 6%) (A) at Strindheim (pPPG at home = 25%) (H) vs Rana (pPPG away = 19%) (A) at Levanger (pPPG at home = 44%) (H) vs Strommen (pPPG away = 79%) (A) at Kjelsas (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Levanger (pPPG away = 38%) (A) at Alta (pPPG at home = 63%)	52.1%
8	Stjordals-Blink	16	8	1	7	25	8.5	53%	49% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (H) vs Honefoss (pPPG away = 44%) (A) at Kjelsas (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Rana (pPPG away = 19%) (A) at Follo (pPPG at home = 57%) (H) vs Alta (pPPG away = 6%) (A) at Eidsvold (pPPG at home = 81%) (A) at Strindheim (pPPG at home = 25%) (H) vs Levanger (pPPG away = 38%) (A) at Strommen (pPPG at home = 78%) (H) vs Ull/Kisa (pPPG away = 75%) (H) vs Grorud (pPPG away = 56%) (A) at Asker (pPPG at home = 44%) (H) vs Tromsdalen (pPPG away = 50%) (H) vs Follo (pPPG away = 17%) (A) at Tromsdalen (pPPG at home = 88%) (H) vs Eidsvold (pPPG away = 50%)	51.1%
9	Levanger	16	4	5	7	17	6.5	41%	53% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (A) at Alta (pPPG at home = 63%) (H) vs Strommen (pPPG away = 79%) (A) at Strindheim (pPPG at home = 25%) (H) vs Grorud (pPPG away = 56%) (A) at Ull/Kisa (pPPG at home = 69%) (H) vs Asker (pPPG away = 19%) (A) at Stjordals-Blink (pPPG at home = 61%) (H) vs Kjelsas (pPPG away = 56%) (A) at Tromsdalen (pPPG at home = 88%) (H) vs Follo (pPPG away = 17%) (A) at Eidsvold (pPPG at home = 81%) (H) vs Honefoss (pPPG away = 44%) (A) at Rana (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Eidsvold (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Honefoss (pPPG at home = 64%) (H) vs Rana (pPPG away = 19%)	46.8%
10	Rana	16	5	2	9	17	6.0	38%	51% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (A) at Strommen (pPPG at home = 78%) (H) vs Alta (pPPG away = 6%) (A) at Stjordals-Blink (pPPG at home = 61%) (H) vs Ull/Kisa (pPPG away = 75%) (A) at Strindheim (pPPG at home = 25%) (H) vs Grorud (pPPG away = 56%) (A) at Asker (pPPG at home = 44%) (H) vs Tromsdalen (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Kjelsas (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Eidsvold (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Honefoss (pPPG at home = 64%) (H) vs Follo (pPPG away = 17%) (H) vs Levanger (pPPG away = 38%) (A) at Ull/Kisa (pPPG at home = 69%) (H) vs Strommen (pPPG away = 79%) (A) at Levanger (pPPG at home = 44%)	44.3%
11	Alta	16	5	1	10	16	5.5	34%	55% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (H) vs Levanger (pPPG away = 38%) (A) at Rana (pPPG at home = 56%) (A) at Tromsdalen (pPPG at home = 88%) (H) vs Strommen (pPPG away = 79%) (A) at Stjordals-Blink (pPPG at home = 61%) (H) vs Strindheim (pPPG away = 13%) (A) at Ull/Kisa (pPPG at home = 69%) (H) vs Asker (pPPG away = 19%) (A) at Honefoss (pPPG at home = 64%) (H) vs Kjelsas (pPPG away = 56%) (A) at Follo (pPPG at home = 57%) (H) vs Grorud (pPPG away = 56%) (A) at Eidsvold (pPPG at home = 81%) (H) vs Tromsdalen (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Grorud (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Honefoss (pPPG away = 44%)	44.7%
12	Follo	16	5	1	10	16	5.5	34%	52% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (A) at Asker (pPPG at home = 44%) (H) vs Strindheim (pPPG away = 13%) (A) at Strommen (pPPG at home = 78%) (H) vs Stjordals-Blink (pPPG away = 43%) (A) at Tromsdalen (pPPG at home = 88%) (H) vs Honefoss (pPPG away = 44%) (A) at Grorud (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Ull/Kisa (pPPG away = 75%) (A) at Eidsvold (pPPG at home = 81%) (A) at Levanger (pPPG at home = 44%) (H) vs Alta (pPPG away = 6%) (A) at Rana (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Kjelsas (pPPG away = 56%) (A) at Stjordals-Blink (pPPG at home = 61%) (H) vs Asker (pPPG away = 19%) (A) at Ull/Kisa (pPPG at home = 69%)	43.2%
13	Asker	16	3	4	9	13	5.0	31%	50% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (H) vs Follo (pPPG away = 17%) (A) at Tromsdalen (pPPG at home = 88%) (H) vs Eidsvold (pPPG away = 50%) (A) at Kjelsas (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Honefoss (pPPG away = 44%) (A) at Levanger (pPPG at home = 44%) (H) vs Rana (pPPG away = 19%) (A) at Alta (pPPG at home = 63%) (H) vs Strindheim (pPPG away = 13%) (A) at Ull/Kisa (pPPG at home = 69%) (H) vs Stjordals-Blink (pPPG away = 43%) (A) at Strommen (pPPG at home = 78%) (A) at Grorud (pPPG at home = 56%) (H) vs Grorud (pPPG away = 56%) (A) at Follo (pPPG at home = 57%) (H) vs Tromsdalen (pPPG away = 50%)	40.6%
14	Strindheim	16	3	0	13	9	3.0	19%	59% Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away: (H) vs Kjelsas (pPPG away = 56%) (A) at Follo (pPPG at home = 57%) (H) vs Levanger (pPPG away = 38%) (A) at Eidsvold (pPPG at home = 81%) (H) vs Rana (pPPG away = 19%) (A) at Alta (pPPG at home = 63%) (H) vs Stjordals-Blink (pPPG away = 43%) (H) vs Strommen (pPPG away = 79%) (H) vs Grorud (pPPG away = 56%) (A) at Asker (pPPG at home = 44%) (H) vs Honefoss (pPPG away = 44%) (A) at Tromsdalen (pPPG at home = 88%) (A) at Ull/Kisa (pPPG at home = 69%) (A) at Strommen (pPPG at home = 78%) (H) vs Ull/Kisa (pPPG away = 75%) (A) at Kjelsas (pPPG at home = 56%)	38.9%
pPts: Performance Points (Win = 1 point \| Draw = 0.5 point \| Defeat = 0 point)
pPPG: Performance Points Per Game (Performance Points relative to total matches played by the team)
Opponents pPPG are calculated based on: - Home pPPG of opponents faced away - Away pPPG of opponents faced at home

More information about the details of each opponent pPPG value is visible by hovering the mouse cursor over any of the 'Opponents pPPG' values.

What is the difference between the Points Performance Index and the Performance Rating?

The Points Performance Index (PPI) is based on Points Per Game. Its goal is to mesure the team's capacity to pick up points in the league table. This is a points-centric indicator.

The Performance Rating is based on what we call Performance Points (pPts). Unlike typical Points, where a draw is rewarded at one third of a win, Performance Points are calculated so as to value a draw as half a win.

The typical 3-1-0 point system provides a clear incentive for teams to aim for the win. In the past, the old 2-1-0 system could cause some teams to aim too often for a draw, which could cause some games to become less interesting to watch, especially from a neutral spectator's perspective.

However calculating 'Performance Points' on the base of 1 point for a win, 0.5 point for a draw and 0 point for a defeat allows to take a different look at team performance, as illustrated in the following example:

Let's assume Team A and Team B have each played 10 games.

Team A has the following record: 5 Wins, 0 Draw, 5 Defeats (Total: 15 points | 5 performance points)

Team B has the following record: 2 Wins, 8 Draws, 0 Defeat (Total: 14 points | 6 performance points)

So Team A has been more effective at picking up points than Team B therefore if both teams were to repeat those exact result patterns until the end of the season, Team A will logically finish the season above Team B in the league table.

Now when it comes to analysing performance, one could argue that a team like Team B, that has remained undefeated, winning twice, should not necessarily be considered as having demonstrated a weaker performance than a team that lost half of their matches, as Team A did.

With the classic points system, Team A has a PPG (Points Per Game) of 1.5 and Team B has a lower PPG: 1.4.

With the Performance Points system, Team A has a pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of 50% and Team B has a higher pPPG: 60%.

How is the Performance Rating calculated?

The Performance Rating (PR) is calculated based on the team's Performance Points Per Game (pPPG) and the pPPG of the opponents already played by the team. It is the average of those two values.

Using the same logic as with the Points Performance Index, the Opponents pPPG value is calculated by taking into account the Away pPPG of opponents played at home and the Home pPPG of opponents played away.

Tables overview

Points
		GP	pts
	Strommen	16	37
	Ull/Kisa	16	33
	Tromsdalen	16	31
	Eidsvold	16	30
	Kjelsas	16	26
	Grorud	16	26
	Honefoss	16	25
	Stjordals-Bl.	16	25
	Levanger	16	17
	Rana	16	17
	Alta	16	16
	Follo	16	16
	Asker	16	13
	Strindheim	16	9

Form (last 8)
		GP	pts
	Strommen	8	19
	Ull/Kisa	8	19
	Eidsvold	8	17
	Stjordals-Bl.	8	16
	Rana	8	13
	Honefoss	8	13
	Tromsdalen	8	12
	Kjelsas	8	10
	Alta	8	10
	Grorud	8	10
	Follo	8	9
	Levanger	8	5
	Asker	8	4
	Strindheim	8	3

Home
		GP	pts
	Strommen	9	21
	Tromsdalen	8	20
	Eidsvold	8	19
	Ull/Kisa	8	16
	Stjordals-Bl.	9	16
	Alta	8	15
	Kjelsas	8	13
	Honefoss	7	13
	Grorud	8	13
	Rana	8	13
	Follo	7	12
	Levanger	8	9
	Asker	8	9
	Strindheim	8	6

Away
		GP	pts
	Ull/Kisa	8	17
	Strommen	7	16
	Kjelsas	8	13
	Grorud	8	13
	Honefoss	9	12
	Tromsdalen	8	11
	Eidsvold	8	11
	Stjordals-Bl.	7	9
	Levanger	8	8
	Follo	9	4
	Rana	8	4
	Asker	8	4
	Strindheim	8	3
	Alta	8	1

Offence
		GP	GF
	Strommen	16	39
	Ull/Kisa	16	37
	Kjelsas	16	34
	Eidsvold	16	33
	Alta	16	32
	Honefoss	16	31
	Tromsdalen	16	31
	Grorud	16	30
	Asker	16	23
	Levanger	16	23
	Stjordals-Bl.	16	23
	Follo	16	21
	Rana	16	18
	Strindheim	16	16

Defence
		GP	GA
	Strommen	16	17
	Tromsdalen	16	21
	Stjordals-Bl.	16	21
	Levanger	16	24
	Ull/Kisa	16	25
	Rana	16	25
	Kjelsas	16	27
	Grorud	16	27
	Honefoss	16	29
	Eidsvold	16	29
	Follo	16	30
	Alta	16	36
	Asker	16	39
	Strindheim	16	41

Segments Table

0 pt

37 pts

5th Segment	4th Segment	3rd Segment	2nd Segment	1st Segment
up to 7.0 pts	from 7.1 to 14.5 pts	from 14.6 to 22.0 pts	from 22.1 to 29.5 pts	from 29.6 to 37 pts
	(16) 13 Asker (16) 9 Strindheim	(16) 17 Levanger (16) 17 Rana (16) 16 Alta (16) 16 Follo	(16) 26 Kjelsas (16) 26 Grorud (16) 25 Honefoss (16) 25 Stjordals-Blink	(16) 37 Strommen (16) 33 Ull/Kisa (16) 31 Tromsdalen (16) 30 Eidsvold

The Segments Table is a visual representation splitting the teams into 5 segments. Each team is assigned to a specific segment, depending on the team's number of points. Each of the 5 segments spans one-fifth (20%) of the total points held by the team ranked 1st in the league. For each team, the number of matches played appears in green between brackets, and the number of points is displayed in black.

Norway - Division 2 - Gr. 2 stats

112 matches played / 182

61.5% completed

Home wins:	54%	Over 1.5 goals:	88%
Draws:	13%	Over 2.5 goals:	67%
Away wins:	33%	Over 3.5 goals:	43%

Goals:	391	Home goals per match:	2.00
Goals per match:	3.49	Away goals per match:	1.49
		Both teams scored:	65%

Results

Home team scored first:	55%	No goal scored:	0%	Away team scored first:	45%
Average minute when home team scored first:	25 min.			Average minute when away team scored first:	29 min.
Home team lead-defending rate:	67%			Away team lead-defending rate:	49%
Home team equalizing rate:	51%			Away team equalizing rate:	33%
Home team lead duration:	36%	Teams level in goals:	42%	Away team lead duration:	22%
Home PPG when home team scored first:	2.35			Away PPG when away team scored first:	1.88

More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 112 matches played in the Norwegian Division 2 Group 2, a total of 391 goals have been scored (3.49 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including Norway - Division 2 - Gr. 2 results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded.

The number of matches included in the regular season may differ depending on the way each league is structured. For most national leagues, the stats above relate to the selected league competition in the regular season, excluding playoff matches. Some leagues include additional rounds of matches, for which dedicated group tables may be featured on this page. When such group tables are displayed on the main league page, the stats above also include the matches related to those tables.

Norway - Division 2 - Gr. 2

Visual table

Tables overview

Points

Form (last 8)

Home

Away

Offence

Defence

Segments Table

Norway - Division 2 - Gr. 2 stats

Results

Tables

Analysis

Goal times