| Home | Away | Total | |
| Played | 8 | 6 | 14 |
| Points Per Game | 1.50 | 2.00 | 1.71 |
| Select Favourite Stats | |||
| View Favourite Stats for all teams | |||
 |
Needham Market |
(this season in the league) |
Needham Market's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 8 Aug | Needham Market |
1:3
1-0 Ryan Miles (3) 1-1 Jamille Matt (30) 1-2 Jake Jervis (35) pen. --------------------------------------- 1-3 Harrison O. (67) |
Bromsgrove | + | - | - | 1-2 |
|
| 11 Aug | Hitchin Town |
1:3
0-1 Ollie Saunders (5) 0-2 Kyle Hammond (7) 1-2 Rio Deall (26) --------------------------------------- 1-3 Kyle Hammond (85) |
Needham Market | + | - | - | 1-2 |
|
| 15 Aug | Alvechurch |
2:0
1-0 Emmanuel Ilesanmi (26) 2-0 Jamey Osborne (27) |
Needham Market | - | - | + | 2-0 |
|
| 22 Aug | Needham Market |
0:1
0-1 Jason Cowley (29) |
Halesowen Town | - | - | + | 0-1 |
|
| 29 Aug | Stratford Town |
1:2
1-0 Kory Roberts (26) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Jake Dye (56) 1-2 Harlyn Palmer (81) |
Needham Market | + | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 31 Aug | Needham Market |
3:3
0-1 Leon Lobjoit (33) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Tevan Allen (58) 2-1 Ryan Miles (62) 3-1 Daniel Morphew (76) pen. 3-2 Carl Mensah (81) 3-3 Leon Lobjoit (88) |
Peterborough S. | + | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| 12 Sep | Needham Market |
2:0
1-0 Daniel Morphew (31) --------------------------------------- 2-0 Liam Pearce (65) |
Worcester City | - | + | - | 1-0 |
|
| 29 Sep | Needham Market |
4:0
1-0 Ryan Miles (4) 2-0 Ryan Miles (18) 3-0 Ryan Miles (24) 4-0 Tevan Allen (45) |
Stamford | + | + | - | 4-0 |
|
| 3 Oct | Rushall |
5:3
1-0 Luke Yates (6) 2-0 Lewis Corbett (24) 3-0 Osaze Okuonghae (41) 3-1 Luke Ingram (44) pen. --------------------------------------- 4-1 Luke Yates (50) 4-2 Liam Pearce (53) 5-2 Liam McAlinden (84) pen. 5-3 Liam Pearce (90) |
Needham Market | + | - | - | 3-1 |
|
| 10 Oct | Needham Market |
1:1
0-1 Kevin Bastos (3) 1-1 Kyle Hammond (32) |
Anstey Nomads | - | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 13 Oct | Bury Town |
0:5
0-1 Liam Pearce (4) 0-2 Luke Ingram (18) 0-3 Liam Pearce (45) --------------------------------------- 0-4 Ryan Miles (64) 0-5 Liam Pearce (79) |
Needham Market | + | + | - | 0-3 |
|
| 17 Oct | Leamington |
1:2
0-1 Ryan Miles (2) 1-1 Chris Wreh (18) 1-2 Ryan Miles (20) |
Needham Market | + | - | - | 1-2 |
|
| 20 Oct | Needham Market |
2:1
1-0 Kyle Hammond (37) 2-0 Ryan Miles (38) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Tyrone Baker (78) |
B. Stortford | + | - | - | 2-0 |
|
| 27 Oct | Needham Market |
1:1
0-1 Rashid Shawahna (12) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Marcel Lewis (72) |
Leighton Town | - | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| Filter Needham Market results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 22 Sep | Leighton Town (pp.) Needham Market | 0.80 | 2.00 | |||
| 31 Oct | Redditch Utd vs Needham Market | 2.00 | 2.00 | |||
| 7 Nov | Needham Market vs Stourbridge | 1.50 | 1.71 | |||
| 10 Nov | Stamford vs Needham Market | 0.17 | 2.00 | |||
| 14 Nov | Needham Market vs Banbury Utd | 1.50 | 0.50 | |||
| 21 Nov | Kettering Town vs Needham Market | 2.50 | 2.00 | |||
| 28 Nov | Real Bedford vs Needham Market | 2.13 | 2.00 | |||
| 5 Dec | Needham Market vs Racing Club War | 1.50 | 1.50 | |||
| 12 Dec | Worcester City vs Needham Market | 1.00 | 2.00 | |||
| 19 Dec | Needham Market vs Rushall | 1.50 | 1.13 | |||
| 26 Dec | Needham Market vs Leiston | 1.50 | 1.13 | |||
| 2 Jan | Peterborough S. vs Needham Market | 1.43 | 2.00 | |||
| 9 Jan | Needham Market vs Bury Town | 1.50 | 2.00 | |||
| 16 Jan | Anstey Nomads vs Needham Market | 2.20 | 2.00 | |||
| 23 Jan | Needham Market vs Leamington | 1.50 | 0.50 | |||
| 30 Jan | B. Stortford vs Needham Market | 1.25 | 2.00 | |||
| 6 Feb | Banbury Utd vs Needham Market | 1.25 | 2.00 | |||
| 13 Feb | Needham Market vs Kettering Town | 1.50 | 1.00 | |||
| 20 Feb | Stourbridge vs Needham Market | 1.17 | 2.00 | |||
| 27 Feb | Needham Market vs Redditch Utd | 1.50 | 1.00 | |||
| 6 Mar | Bromsgrove vs Needham Market | 1.88 | 2.00 | |||
| 13 Mar | Needham Market vs Alvechurch | 1.50 | 1.50 | |||
| 20 Mar | Halesowen Town vs Needham Market | 2.29 | 2.00 | |||
| 26 Mar | Needham Market vs Hitchin Town | 1.50 | 0.17 | |||
| 29 Mar | Leiston vs Needham Market | 1.50 | 2.00 | |||
| 3 Apr | Needham Market vs Stratford Town | 1.50 | 1.00 | |||
| 10 Apr | Needham Market vs Real Bedford | 1.50 | 2.50 | |||
| 17 Apr | Racing Club War vs Needham Market | 1.00 | 2.00 | |||
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.36 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
Run-in overview | ||||||
|
Of their 28 remaining matches in the league, Needham Market will be playing more matches away (15) than at home (13).
Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, Needham Market's remaining away matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining home matches.
Needham Market's opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 1.20 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that Needham Market will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 1.50 Points Per Game at home in the league. | ||||||
| View opponents PPG values for all teams | ||||||
| Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
Needham Market (14 matches) vs league average
Needham Market at home (8 matches) vs league average at home
Needham Market away (6 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Needham Market goals statistics indicate an average of 2.07 goals scored per game so far this season, which is higher than the average number of 1.53 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in the league. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Needham Market | |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 7 / 14 | 50% | |
| Opponent scored first | 7 / 14 | 50% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 6 / 14 | 43% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 7 / 14 | 50% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 36.9 min. | 41% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 23.9 min. | 27% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 29.1 min. | 32% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Needham Market have been in the lead for an average duration of 36.9 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 29.1 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Needham Market | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 14 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 10 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 3 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 70% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 8 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 4 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 15 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 9 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
Needham Market have taken the lead 10 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 70% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 30%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 8 times that Needham Market's opponents have taken the lead, Needham Market have managed to score an equalizer on 4 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 50%.
|
Needham Market | |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 4 / 8 | 50% | |
| Opponent scored first | 4 / 8 | 50% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 3 / 8 | 38% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 4 / 8 | 50% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 31.4 min. | 35% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 29.9 min. | 33% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 28.8 min. | 32% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Needham Market have been in the lead for an average duration of 31.4 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 28.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Needham Market | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 8 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 5 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 2 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 60% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 5 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 3 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 60% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 6 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 3 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Needham Market have taken the lead 5 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 60% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 40%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 5 times that Needham Market's opponents have taken the lead when Needham Market were playing at home, Needham Market have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 60%.
|
Needham Market | |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 3 / 6 | 50% | |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 6 | 50% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 3 / 6 | 50% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 3 / 6 | 50% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 44.3 min. | 49% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 16.0 min. | 18% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 29.7 min. | 33% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Needham Market have been in the lead for an average duration of 44.3 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 29.7 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Needham Market | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 6 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 5 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 1 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 80% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 3 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 1 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 33% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 9 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 6 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Needham Market have taken the lead 5 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 80% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 20%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 3 times that Needham Market's opponents have taken the lead when Needham Market were playing away, Needham Market have managed to score an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away equalizing rate of 33%.
Results table
Needham Market stats rank the team in 6th position in the the league table with 24 points, 1 point behind Kettering Town. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 14 | 15 | 29 |
| GF per match | 1.75 | 2.50 | 2.07 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 10 | 10 | 20 |
| GA per match | 1.25 | 1.67 | 1.43 |
| GF + GA per match | 3.00 | 4.17 | 3.50 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 88% | 100% | 93% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 50% | 83% | 64% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 38% | 50% | 43% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 12% | 33% | 21% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 12% | 17% | 14% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 50% | 83% | 64% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 25% | 67% | 43% |
| Needham Market over 2.5 stats indicate a 64% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is higher than the league average value of 59% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in the league. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 25% | 17% | 21% |
| Won-to-nil | 25% | 17% | 21% |
| Failed to score | 12% | 17% | 14% |
| Lost-to-nil | 12% | 17% | 14% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 88% | 83% | 86% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 62% | 67% | 64% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 38% | 67% | 50% |
| Scored in both halves | 12% | 50% | 29% |
| Both teams scored | 62% | 67% | 64% |
| Conceding Rate | 75% | 83% | 79% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 62% | 83% | 71% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 38% | 17% | 29% |
| Conceded in both halves | 25% | 17% | 21% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 88% | 83% | 86% |
| GF over 1.5 | 50% | 83% | 64% |
| GF over 2.5 | 25% | 50% | 36% |
| GF over 3.5 | 12% | 17% | 14% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 17% | 7% |
| GA over 0.5 | 75% | 83% | 79% |
| GA over 1.5 | 25% | 33% | 29% |
| GA over 2.5 | 25% | 17% | 21% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 17% | 7% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 17% | 7% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Needham Market matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 12% | 0% | 7% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 38% | 17% | 29% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 12% | 33% | 21% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 25% | 17% | 21% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 12% | 33% | 21% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 12% | 0% | 7% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 38% | 50% | 43% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Away wins | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Home & Away wins | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
|
A majority of Needham Market's wins have been obtained with a margin of 2 goals or more (4 wins), while 3 of their wins had a one-goal margin. A majority of Needham Market's defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (3 defeats), while 1 of their defeats had a one-goal margin. |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 50% | 50% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | |
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.50 |
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 2.00 |
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | -0.50 |
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 48% | 52% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 50% | 50% | ||
| League average | 55% | 45% | ||
|
Matches played at home have accounted for 50% of Needham Market's total points and only 48% of the goals they have scored so far this season in the league. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 3 | 3 | 6 | 43% |
| Drawing at HT | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7% |
| Losing at HT | 4 | 3 | 7 | 50% |
| Total | 8 | 6 | 14 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
Needham Market |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 17 | 59% | |
| GA | 14 | 70% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 12 | 41% | |
| GA | 6 | 30% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 42 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 39 |
|
Needham Market |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 9 | 64% | |
| GA | 6 | 60% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 5 | 36% | |
| GA | 4 | 40% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 40 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 46 |
|
Needham Market |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 8 | 53% | |
| GA | 8 | 80% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 7 | 47% | |
| GA | 2 | 20% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 44 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 33 |
Needham Market scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Needham Market score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 1-1 so far (2 times).
The Needham Market score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-2 so far (2 times).
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| This season in the league |
|
Needham Market have won 4 of their 6 away matches. Needham Market have been undefeated in their last 5 matches. Needham Market have scored in each of their last 10 matches. Needham Market failed to keep a clean sheet in 6 of their 8 home matches. Needham Market failed to keep a clean sheet in 5 of their 6 away matches. Needham Market have scored in 5 of their 6 away matches. Needham Market have scored 59% of their goals in the first half. 70% of Needham Market's conceded goals occurred in the first half. Needham Market were losing at half-time in 7 of their 14 matches. Needham Market have won their last 2 away matches. Needham Market have scored a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 4 away matches. Needham Market have scored 21% of their goals in the first 15 minutes. View comments for all teams |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsMatch total goals stats
Match total goals statsMatch total goals stats (last 8 matches)
Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)Match total goals stats (at home)
Match total goals stats (at home)Match total goals stats (away)
Match total goals stats (away)Example
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
