| Home | Away | Total | |
| Played | 8 | 7 | 15 |
| Points Per Game | 1.75 | 1.57 | 1.67 |
| Select Favourite Stats | |||
| View Favourite Stats for all teams | |||
 |
Traef |
(this season in the league) |
Traef's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 6 Apr | Traef |
2:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Sivert Gussias (81) 2-0 Wachirawut Phudithip (90) |
Brattvag | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| 12 Apr | Notodden |
1:2
0-1 Iver Flnes (5) 1-1 M. Solhaug Wenneberg (11) --------------------------------------- 1-2 S. Finny (86) |
Traef | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 18 Apr | Traef |
0:2
0-1 Teodor Hland (17) --------------------------------------- 0-2 Teodor Hland (51) |
Sotra | - | - | + | 0-1 |
|
| 26 Apr | Jerv |
1:1
0-1 Magnus Lvik (16) 1-1 Pascal Mnyonge Simba (38) |
Traef | - | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 3 May | Traef |
2:2
0-1 J. Bruusgaard (20) 1-1 Magnus Lvik (39) pen. --------------------------------------- 2-1 Magnus Lvik (59) pen. 2-2 M. Bringaker (73) |
Mjondalen | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 10 May | Sandviken |
4:2
1-0 Herman Stang Stakset (4) 2-0 Herman Stang Stakset (12) 2-1 Linus Juberg-Hovland (20) --------------------------------------- 3-1 Bendik August Engen (58) 3-2 N.A (69) 4-2 Vebjrn Hynes (82) |
Traef | + | - | - | 2-1 |
|
| 14 May | Traef |
4:0
1-0 N.A (12) 2-0 M. Lewis (38) --------------------------------------- 3-0 M. Lewis (52) 4-0 Linus Juberg-Hovland (90) |
Lysekloster | + | + | - | 2-0 |
|
| 24 May | Traef |
3:3
1-0 Je#246;rgen Be#246;e (12) 1-1 T. Meen (18) 2-1 Nikolai Ohr (26) --------------------------------------- 2-2 C. Dankwah (62) 2-3 T. Meen (69) 3-3 Linus Juberg-Hovland (82) |
Pors Grenland | + | - | - | 2-1 |
|
| 30 May | Vidar |
1:1
1-0 Henrik Jensen (7) --------------------------------------- 1-1 N.A (68) |
Traef | - | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 14 Jun | Traef |
2:3
1-0 Magnus Lvik (15) 1-1 Axel Ahlander (25) 1-2 Mads Christophersen (29) --------------------------------------- 2-2 Linus Juberg-Hovland (66) 2-3 Axel Ahlander (89) |
Bjarg | + | - | - | 1-2 |
|
| 21 Jun | Arendal |
3:1
1-0 Mikal Berg Kvinge (40) 1-1 Je#246;rgen Be#246;e (44) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Torben Dvergsdal (74) 3-1 Marcus Victorio (89) |
Traef | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 27 Jun | Traef |
3:1
1-0 Magnus Lvik (6) pen. 2-0 Mathias Silseth Mork (25) 2-1 Mohamed Moussa Srour (37) --------------------------------------- 3-1 N.A (90) |
Eik Tonsberg | + | - | - | 2-1 |
|
| 26 Jul | Kvik Halden |
0:1
0-1 F. Kristoffersen (39) |
Traef | - | + | - | 0-1 |
|
| 2 Aug | Traef |
3:2
0-1 Samu Alanko (13) 0-2 K. Badjie (16) 1-2 Wachirawut Phudithip (17) 2-2 Linus Juberg-Hovland (45) --------------------------------------- 3-2 Vegard Forren (50) pen. |
Jerv | + | - | - | 2-2 |
|
| 9 Aug | Eik Tonsberg |
0:1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 P. Tveraas (89) |
Traef | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| Filter Traef results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 16 Aug | Sotra vs Traef | 1.43 | 1.57 | |||
| 30 Aug | Traef vs Vidar | 1.75 | 0.14 | |||
| 6 Sep | Pors Grenland vs Traef | 1.00 | 1.57 | |||
| 13 Sep | Traef vs Notodden | 1.75 | 2.38 | |||
| 20 Sep | Bjarg vs Traef | 1.25 | 1.57 | |||
| 27 Sep | Traef vs Kvik Halden | 1.75 | 2.13 | |||
| 4 Oct | Mjondalen vs Traef | 2.29 | 1.57 | |||
| 11 Oct | Traef vs Sandviken | 1.75 | 1.00 | |||
| 18 Oct | Lysekloster vs Traef | 0.75 | 1.57 | |||
| 25 Oct | Traef vs Arendal | 1.75 | 0.71 | |||
| 31 Oct | Brattvag vs Traef | 2.14 | 1.57 | |||
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.38 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
Run-in overview | ||||||
|
Of their 11 remaining matches in the Norwegian Division 2 Group 1, Traef will be playing more matches away (6) than at home (5).
Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, Traef's remaining away matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining home matches.
Traef's opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 1.27 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that Traef will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 1.48 Points Per Game at home in the league. | ||||||
| View opponents PPG values for all teams | ||||||
| Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
Traef (15 matches) vs league average
Traef at home (8 matches) vs league average at home
Traef away (7 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Traef goals statistics indicate an average of 1.87 goals scored per game so far this season, which is higher than the average number of 1.55 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in Norway - Division 2 - Gr. 1. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Traef | |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 9 / 15 | 60% | |
| Opponent scored first | 6 / 15 | 40% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 4 / 15 | 27% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 4 / 15 | 27% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 24.1 min. | 27% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 43.1 min. | 48% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 22.8 min. | 25% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Traef have been in the lead for an average duration of 24.1 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 22.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Traef | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 15 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 13 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 6 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 54% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 10 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 6 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 60% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 9 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 7 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
Traef have taken the lead 13 times and have conceded an equalizer on 6 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 54% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 46%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 10 times that Traef's opponents have taken the lead, Traef have managed to score an equalizer on 6 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 60%.
|
Traef | |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 5 / 8 | 62% | |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 8 | 38% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 3 / 8 | 38% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 2 / 8 | 25% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 34.6 min. | 38% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 33.5 min. | 37% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 21.9 min. | 24% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Traef have been in the lead for an average duration of 34.6 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 21.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Traef | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 8 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 8 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 4 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 50% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 6 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 4 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 67% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 7 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 3 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Traef have taken the lead 8 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 6 times that Traef's opponents have taken the lead when Traef were playing at home, Traef have managed to score an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 67%.
|
Traef | |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 4 / 7 | 57% | |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 7 | 43% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 1 / 7 | 14% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 2 / 7 | 29% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 12.0 min. | 13% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 54.1 min. | 60% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 23.9 min. | 27% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Traef have been in the lead for an average duration of 12.0 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 23.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Traef | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 7 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 5 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 2 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 60% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 4 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 2 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 2 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 4 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Traef have taken the lead 5 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 60% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 40%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 4 times that Traef's opponents have taken the lead when Traef were playing away, Traef have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 50%.
Results table
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 19 | 9 | 28 |
| GF per match | 2.38 | 1.29 | 1.87 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 13 | 10 | 23 |
| GA per match | 1.63 | 1.43 | 1.53 |
| GF + GA per match | 4.00 | 2.71 | 3.40 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 100% | 71% | 87% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 75% | 43% | 60% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 75% | 29% | 53% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 38% | 14% | 27% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 12% | 14% | 13% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 88% | 86% | 87% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 75% | 57% | 67% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 50% | 14% | 33% |
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 25% | 29% | 27% |
| Won-to-nil | 25% | 29% | 27% |
| Failed to score | 12% | 0% | 7% |
| Lost-to-nil | 12% | 0% | 7% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 88% | 100% | 93% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 75% | 71% | 73% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 88% | 57% | 73% |
| Scored in both halves | 75% | 29% | 53% |
| Both teams scored | 62% | 71% | 67% |
| Conceding Rate | 75% | 71% | 73% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 75% | 71% | 73% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 50% | 29% | 40% |
| Conceded in both halves | 50% | 29% | 40% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 88% | 100% | 93% |
| GF over 1.5 | 88% | 29% | 60% |
| GF over 2.5 | 50% | 0% | 27% |
| GF over 3.5 | 12% | 0% | 7% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 75% | 71% | 73% |
| GA over 1.5 | 62% | 29% | 47% |
| GA over 2.5 | 25% | 29% | 27% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 14% | 7% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Traef matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 0% | 29% | 13% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 25% | 29% | 27% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 0% | 14% | 7% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 38% | 14% | 27% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 38% | 14% | 27% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 0% | 29% | 13% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 25% | 43% | 33% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 75% | 29% | 53% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Away wins | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
|
A majority of Traef's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (4 wins), while 3 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more. A majority of Traef's defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (3 defeats), while 1 of their defeats had a one-goal margin. |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 56% | 44% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | |
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.75 |
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.57 |
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | +0.18 |
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 68% | 32% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 57% | 43% | ||
| League average | 52% | 48% | ||
|
Matches played at home have accounted for 56% of Traef's total points and 68% of the goals they have scored so far this season in Norway - Division 2 - Gr. 1. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 3 | 1 | 4 | 27% |
| Drawing at HT | 3 | 4 | 7 | 47% |
| Losing at HT | 2 | 2 | 4 | 27% |
| Total | 8 | 7 | 15 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
Traef |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 15 | 54% | |
| GA | 14 | 61% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 13 | 46% | |
| GA | 9 | 39% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 48 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 41 |
|
Traef |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 10 | 53% | |
| GA | 8 | 62% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 9 | 47% | |
| GA | 5 | 38% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 47 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 40 |
|
Traef |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 5 | 56% | |
| GA | 6 | 60% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 4 | 44% | |
| GA | 4 | 40% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 48 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 42 |
Traef scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| This season in the league |
|
Traef have won their last 4 matches. Traef have been undefeated in their last 4 matches. Traef have scored in each of their last 12 matches. Traef failed to keep a clean sheet in 6 of their 8 home matches. Traef have scored in each of their 7 away matches. Traef have scored 68% of their goals at home. 57% of Traef's conceded goals were conceded at home. 61% of Traef's conceded goals occurred in the first half. Traef have won their last 2 away matches. Traef have scored in each of their last 7 away matches. Traef have kept a clean sheet in their last 2 away matches. Traef have scored a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 6 home matches. 22% of Traef's conceded goals occurred in the first 15 minutes. View comments for all teams |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsMatch total goals stats
Match total goals statsMatch total goals stats (last 8 matches)
Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)Match total goals stats (at home)
Match total goals stats (at home)Match total goals stats (away)
Match total goals stats (away)Example
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
