| REMOVE ADS - Enjoy an ad-free experience on SoccerSTATS.com and show your support: become a Member! | More info |
 |
Kamaz |
(this season in the league) |
Kamaz's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 16 Jul | Neftekhimik |
0 - 1
0-1 A. Polyutkin (35) |
Kamaz | - | + | - | 0-1 | stats |
| 25 Jul | Kamaz |
3 - 2
1-0 D. Shamkin (14) 1-1 V. Aleynikov (22) 2-1 D. Talikin (28) --------------------------------------- 3-1 D. Shamkin (71) 3-2 A. Alievich (84) |
SKA Khabarovsk | + | - | - | 2-1 | stats |
| 31 Jul | Urozhay |
0 - 1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 V. Babaev (87) |
Kamaz | - | + | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 7 Aug | Kamaz |
1 - 1
1-0 V. Paltsev (28) --------------------------------------- 1-1 D. Pivovarov (55) |
Krasnodar B | - | - | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 13 Aug | Volga Ulyanovsk |
0 - 2
--------------------------------------- 0-1 S. Serchenkov (54) 0-2 A. Tsygantsov (o.g.) (69) |
Kamaz | - | + | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 21 Aug | Kamaz |
4 - 0
1-0 V. Babaev (45) --------------------------------------- 2-0 V. Babaev (56) 3-0 D. Shamkin (63) 4-0 A. Gagloev (76) pen. |
Akron | + | + | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 28 Aug | Rubin Kazan |
1 - 1
1-0 D. Kabutov (16) --------------------------------------- 1-1 A. Mokhammad (90) |
Kamaz | - | - | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 4 Sep | Kamaz |
0 - 0
|
Baltika | - | + | + | 0-0 | stats |
| 11 Sep | A. Vladikavkaz |
4 - 2
1-0 K. Khosonov (11) 2-0 S. Kachmazov (14) --------------------------------------- 3-0 A. Galoyan (50) 3-1 A. Sikoev (64) 3-2 A. Denisov (67) 4-2 I. Mashukov (72) |
Kamaz | + | - | - | 2-0 | stats |
| 18 Sep | Kamaz |
1 - 2
0-1 O. Krasilnichenko (5) --------------------------------------- 1-1 V. Paltsev (70) 1-2 S. Gasanov (82) |
Makhachkala | + | - | - | 0-1 | stats |
| 25 Sep | Veles Moscow |
1 - 1
0-1 A. Mokhammad (31) --------------------------------------- 1-1 I. Logua (52) pen. |
Kamaz | - | - | - | 0-1 | stats |
| 1 Oct | Kamaz |
2 - 0
1-0 D. Shamkin (30) --------------------------------------- 2-0 A. Gagloev (53) pen. |
Rodina Moskva | - | + | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 9 Oct | V. Astrakhan |
0 - 0
|
Kamaz | - | + | + | 0-0 | stats |
| 14 Oct | Kamaz |
1 - 0
1-0 I. Badrtdinov (4) |
Yenisey | - | + | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 23 Oct | Shinnik |
1 - 0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 E. Nizamutdinov (80) |
Kamaz | - | - | + | 0-0 | stats |
| 29 Oct | Kamaz |
2 - 2
1-0 A. Gagloev (37) pen. 2-0 I. Badrtdinov (39) --------------------------------------- 2-1 R. Minaev (88) 2-2 Egas Cacintura (90) |
Ufa | + | - | - | 2-0 | stats |
| 6 Nov | Kamaz |
0 - 1
0-1 A. Grigoryan (12) |
Arsenal Tula | - | - | + | 0-1 | stats |
| 13 Nov | SKA Khabarovsk |
3 - 1
1-0 D. Starodub (39) --------------------------------------- 2-0 M. Musalov (56) 3-0 D. Starodub (65) 3-1 V. Paltsev (87) |
Kamaz | + | - | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 20 Nov | Kamaz |
2 - 1
0-1 D. Rodin (24) --------------------------------------- 1-1 V. Paltsev (90) 2-1 D. Shamkin (90) |
Urozhay | + | - | - | 0-1 | stats |
| 27 Nov | Krasnodar B |
2 - 2
0-1 N. Kirsanov (13) 1-1 R. Apekov (17) --------------------------------------- 1-2 A. Gagloev (64) 2-2 R. Khalnazarov (86) |
Kamaz | + | - | - | 1-1 | stats |
| 6 Mar | Kamaz |
0 - 0
|
Volga Ulyanovsk | - | + | + | 0-0 | stats |
| 11 Mar | Akron |
2 - 0
1-0 V. Azarov (14) --------------------------------------- 2-0 Andrés Ponce (83) |
Kamaz | - | - | + | 1-0 | stats |
| 18 Mar | Kamaz |
0 - 0
|
Rubin Kazan | - | + | + | 0-0 | stats |
| 26 Mar | Baltika |
1 - 0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 S. Pryakhin (76) |
Kamaz | - | - | + | 0-0 | stats |
| 2 Apr | Kamaz |
1 - 0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Bogdan Reichman (62) |
A. Vladikavkaz | - | + | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 8 Apr | Makhachkala |
1 - 0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 N. Glushkov (90) |
Kamaz | - | - | + | 0-0 | stats |
| 15 Apr | Kamaz |
0 - 2
0-1 O. Smirnov (26) 0-2 J. Dibirgadzhiev (45) pen. |
Veles Moscow | - | - | + | 0-2 | stats |
| 22 Apr | Rodina Moskva |
2 - 2
1-0 Wesley Nata (4) 1-1 Y. Kirillov (22) --------------------------------------- 2-1 I. Timoshenko (55) 2-2 A. Shcherbatyuk (84) |
Kamaz | + | - | - | 1-1 | stats |
| 29 Apr | Kamaz |
2 - 2
1-0 A. Arustamyan (1) 2-0 I. Badrtdinov (43) --------------------------------------- 2-1 D. Smirnov (55) 2-2 D. Smirnov (88) |
V. Astrakhan | + | - | - | 2-0 | stats |
| 6 May | Yenisey |
2 - 1
1-0 A. Okladnikov (26) --------------------------------------- 2-0 A. Okladnikov (68) 2-1 A. Gagloev (81) |
Kamaz | + | - | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 12 May | Kamaz |
1 - 0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 E. Osipov (o.g.) (49) |
Shinnik | - | + | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 20 May | Ufa |
1 - 0
1-0 I. Molteninov (14) |
Kamaz | - | - | + | 1-0 | stats |
| 27 May | Arsenal Tula |
0 - 1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 A. Mokhammad (90) |
Kamaz | - | + | - | 0-0 | stats |
| Filter Kamaz results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 3 Jun | Kamaz | h2h | Neftekhimik | 1.69 | 1.25 | |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
Kamaz (33 matches) compared to league average
Kamaz at home (16 matches) compared to league average at home
Kamaz away (17 matches) compared to league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kamaz goals statistics indicate an average of 1.06 goals scored per game so far this season, which is lower than the average number of 1.14 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in Russia - FNL. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Kamaz | |
| Leading & trailing stats (total) | (this season in the league) |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 15 / 33 | 45% |
| Opponent scored first | 14 / 33 | 42% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 9 / 33 | 27% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 10 / 33 | 30% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 19.3 min. | 21% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 47.3 min. | 53% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 23.4 min. | 26% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Kamaz have been in the lead for an average duration of 19.3 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 23.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Kamaz | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | (this season in the league) |
| Matches played | 33 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 18 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 7 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 61% |
| EQUALIZING (total) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 16 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 5 |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 31% |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 12 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 11 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
Kamaz have taken the lead 18 times and have conceded an equalizer on 7 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 61% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 39%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 16 times that Kamaz's opponents have taken the lead, Kamaz have managed to score an equalizer on 5 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 31%.
|
Kamaz | |
| Leading & trailing stats (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 9 / 16 | 56% |
| Opponent scored first | 4 / 16 | 25% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 7 / 16 | 44% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 4 / 16 | 25% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 31.1 min. | 35% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 41.4 min. | 46% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 17.6 min. | 20% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Kamaz have been in the lead for an average duration of 31.1 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 17.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Kamaz | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| Matches played | 16 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 11 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 4 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 64% |
| EQUALIZING (home) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 5 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 2 |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 40% |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 7 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 4 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Kamaz have taken the lead 11 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 64% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 36%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 5 times that Kamaz's opponents have taken the lead when Kamaz were playing at home, Kamaz have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 40%.
|
Kamaz | |
| Leading & trailing stats (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 6 / 17 | 35% |
| Opponent scored first | 10 / 17 | 59% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 2 / 17 | 12% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 6 / 17 | 35% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 8.3 min. | 9% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 52.8 min. | 59% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 28.9 min. | 32% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Kamaz have been in the lead for an average duration of 8.3 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 28.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Kamaz | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| Matches played | 17 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 7 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 3 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 57% |
| EQUALIZING (away) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 11 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 3 |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 27% |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 5 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 7 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Kamaz have taken the lead 7 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 57% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 43%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 11 times that Kamaz's opponents have taken the lead when Kamaz were playing away, Kamaz have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 27%.
Results table
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 20 | 15 | 35 |
| GF per match | 1.25 | 0.88 | 1.06 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 13 | 21 | 34 |
| GA per match | 0.81 | 1.24 | 1.03 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.06 | 2.12 | 2.09 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 81% | 94% | 88% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 56% | 53% | 55% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 38% | 29% | 33% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 25% | 24% | 24% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 6% | 3% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 69% | 59% | 64% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 25% | 18% | 21% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 6% | 0% | 3% |
| Kamaz over 2.5 stats indicate a 33% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is lower than the league average value of 42% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in Russia - FNL. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 50% | 29% | 39% |
| Won-to-nil | 31% | 24% | 27% |
| Failed to score | 31% | 35% | 33% |
| Lost-to-nil | 12% | 29% | 21% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 69% | 65% | 67% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-Half | 44% | 24% | 33% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-Half | 44% | 53% | 48% |
| Scored in both halves | 19% | 12% | 15% |
| Both teams scored | 38% | 41% | 39% |
| Conceding Rate | 50% | 71% | 61% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 31% | 47% | 39% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 31% | 59% | 45% |
| Conceded in both halves | 12% | 35% | 24% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 69% | 65% | 67% |
| GF over 1.5 | 38% | 24% | 30% |
| GF over 2.5 | 12% | 0% | 6% |
| GF over 3.5 | 6% | 0% | 3% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 50% | 71% | 61% |
| GA over 1.5 | 31% | 35% | 33% |
| GA over 2.5 | 0% | 12% | 6% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 6% | 3% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Kamaz matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 19% | 6% | 12% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 25% | 41% | 33% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 19% | 24% | 21% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 12% | 6% | 9% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 19% | 18% | 18% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 44% | 47% | 45% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 31% | 29% | 30% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 25% | 24% | 24% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Away wins | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| A majority of Kamaz's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (8 wins), while 3 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more. A majority of Kamaz's defeats had a one-goal margin (7 defeats), while 4 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more. | ||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 61% | 39% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | ||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.69 | |||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.00 | |||
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | +0.69 | |||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored (GF) | 57% | 43% | ||
| % Goals conceded (GA) | 38% | 62% | ||
| League average (% goals) | 55% | 45% | ||
| Matches played at home have accounted for 61% of Kamaz's total points and 57% of the goals they have scored so far this season in Russia - FNL. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 7 | 2 | 9 | 27% |
| Drawing at HT | 5 | 9 | 14 | 42% |
| Losing at HT | 4 | 6 | 10 | 30% |
| Total | 16 | 17 | 33 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
Kamaz |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 9 | ||
| GA | 10 | |||
| 1st H. | GF | 14 | 40% | |
| GA | 15 | 44% | ||
| 2nd H. | GF | 21 | 60% | |
| GA | 19 | 56% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 54 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 49 |
|
Kamaz |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 1st H. | GF | 10 | 50% | |
| GA | 6 | 46% | ||
| 2nd H. | GF | 10 | 50% | |
| GA | 7 | 54% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 47 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 52 |
|
Kamaz |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 1st H. | GF | 4 | 27% | |
| GA | 9 | 43% | ||
| 2nd H. | GF | 11 | 73% | |
| GA | 12 | 57% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 63 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 47 |
Kamaz scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Kamaz score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-0 so far (4 times). |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This season in the league |
| 67% of Kamaz's matches had under 2.5 goals in total. |
Kamaz table positionsTotal Match Goals statsTotal match goals stats
Total match goals stats (last 8 matches)
Total match goals stats (at home)
Total match goals stats (away)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Kamaz results and statistical indicators can help provide insights on Kamaz's ranking
in a variety of tables, for example to check how far the team or other teams are from the league leaders in the table.
The type of data that can be featured includes the team's league matches and goal scoring indicators such as the average number of goals scored at home or away, streaks and sequences of results, offense and defense stats, how Kamaz's record compares with league average values all teams combined, along with form stats such as the average points per game in the team's last 8 results in Russia - FNL. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
