| Home | Away | Total | |
| Played | 5 | 6 | 11 |
| Points Per Game | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.82 |
| Select Favourite Stats | |||
| View Favourite Stats for all teams | |||
 |
Grasshopper |
(this season in the league) |
Grasshopper's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 25 Jul | Lausanne Sport |
1:1
1-0 Ibrahim Bah Mendes (33) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Samuele Bengondo (81) |
Grasshopper | - | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 2 Aug | Grasshopper |
1:4
1-0 Luke Plange (22) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Dereck Moncada (52) 1-2 Yanis Cimignani (71) 1-3 Elias Pihlstrm (78) 1-4 Yanis Cimignani (90) |
Lugano | + | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 8 Aug | Servette |
2:1
0-1 Amir Abrashi (12) 1-1 Samuel Mrz (29) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Mathis Lambourde (75) |
Grasshopper | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 30 Aug | Vaduz |
5:2
1-0 Lutfi Dalipi (12) 1-1 Young-joon Lee (35) 2-1 Dominik Schwizer (43) 2-2 Nikolas Muci (45) --------------------------------------- 3-2 Dominik Schwizer (55) pen. 4-2 Juan Cabrera (58) 5-2 Juan Cabrera (76) |
Grasshopper | + | - | - | 2-2 |
|
| 2 Sep | Grasshopper |
2:0
1-0 Amir Abrashi (36) --------------------------------------- 2-0 Young-joon Lee (69) |
St. Gallen | - | + | - | 1-0 |
|
| 5 Sep | Grasshopper |
2:2
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Kevin Spadanuda (54) 1-1 Samuel Krasniqi (58) 1-2 Umeh Emmanuel (80) 2-2 Bujar Pllana (90) |
FC Zurich | + | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 12 Sep | Thun |
0:1
0-1 Samuele Bengondo (23) |
Grasshopper | - | + | - | 0-1 |
|
| 15 Sep | Grasshopper |
2:5
0-1 Ilyas Chouaref (12) 1-1 Samuel Krasniqi (42) pen. --------------------------------------- 2-1 Giotto Morandi (49) 2-2 Rilind Nivokazi (63) 2-3 Rilind Nivokazi (69) 2-4 Fod Sylla (82) 2-5 Josias Lukembila (90) |
Sion | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 19 Sep | Luzern |
5:1
1-0 Tyron Owusu (5) 2-0 Oscar Kabwit (9) --------------------------------------- 3-0 N.A (60) pen. 4-0 N.A (73) 4-1 Samuele Bengondo (76) 5-1 N.A (86) |
Grasshopper | + | - | - | 2-0 |
|
| 11 Oct | Grasshopper |
0:2
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Samuel Essende (49) 0-2 Christian Fassnacht (52) |
BSC Young Boys | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 25 Oct | FC Basel |
0:0
|
Grasshopper | - | + | + | 0-0 |
|
| Filter Grasshopper results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 31 Oct | Grasshopper vs Vaduz | 0.80 | 0.00 | |||
| 7 Nov | Grasshopper vs Lausanne Sport | 0.80 | 0.67 | |||
| 21 Nov | Lugano vs Grasshopper | 2.67 | 0.83 | |||
| 28 Nov | Grasshopper vs FC Basel | 0.80 | 2.00 | |||
| 6 Dec | St. Gallen vs Grasshopper | 1.40 | 0.83 | |||
| 12 Dec | FC Zurich vs Grasshopper | 2.00 | 0.83 | |||
| 19 Dec | Grasshopper vs Luzern | 0.80 | 0.50 | |||
| 16 Jan | Sion vs Grasshopper | 2.17 | 0.83 | |||
| 23 Jan | Grasshopper vs Servette | 0.80 | 1.20 | |||
| 30 Jan | Grasshopper vs Thun | 0.80 | 1.50 | |||
| 6 Feb | BSC Young Boys vs Grasshopper | 2.33 | 0.83 | |||
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.49 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
Run-in overview | ||||||
|
Of their 11 remaining matches in the league, Grasshopper will be playing more matches at home (6) than away (5).
Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, Grasshopper's remaining away matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining home matches.
Grasshopper's opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 0.98 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that Grasshopper will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 2.11 Points Per Game at home in the league. | ||||||
| View opponents PPG values for all teams | ||||||
| Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
Grasshopper (11 matches) vs league average
Grasshopper at home (5 matches) vs league average at home
Grasshopper away (6 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Grasshopper goals statistics indicate an average of 1.18 goals scored per game so far this season, which is lower than the average number of 1.83 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in Super League. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Grasshopper | |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 4 / 11 | 36% | |
| Opponent scored first | 6 / 11 | 55% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 3 / 11 | 27% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 2 / 11 | 18% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 16.5 min. | 18% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 43.2 min. | 48% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 30.3 min. | 34% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Grasshopper have been in the lead for an average duration of 16.5 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 30.3 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Grasshopper | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 11 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 5 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 3 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 40% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 12 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 6 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 2 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 11 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
Grasshopper have taken the lead 5 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 40% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 60%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 12 times that Grasshopper's opponents have taken the lead, Grasshopper have managed to score an equalizer on 6 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 50%.
|
Grasshopper | |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 2 / 5 | 40% | |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 5 | 60% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 2 / 5 | 40% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 0 / 5 | 0% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 19.6 min. | 22% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 45.4 min. | 50% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 25.0 min. | 28% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Grasshopper have been in the lead for an average duration of 19.6 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 25.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Grasshopper | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 5 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 3 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 2 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 33% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 6 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 3 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 1 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 5 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Grasshopper have taken the lead 3 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 33% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 67%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 6 times that Grasshopper's opponents have taken the lead when Grasshopper were playing at home, Grasshopper have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 50%.
|
Grasshopper | |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 2 / 6 | 33% | |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 6 | 50% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 1 / 6 | 17% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 2 / 6 | 33% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 14.0 min. | 16% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 41.3 min. | 46% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 34.7 min. | 39% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Grasshopper have been in the lead for an average duration of 14.0 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 34.7 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Grasshopper | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 6 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 2 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 1 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 50% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 6 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 3 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 1 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 6 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Grasshopper have taken the lead 2 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 6 times that Grasshopper's opponents have taken the lead when Grasshopper were playing away, Grasshopper have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 50%.
Results table
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 7 | 6 | 13 |
| GF per match | 1.40 | 1.00 | 1.18 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 13 | 13 | 26 |
| GA per match | 2.60 | 2.17 | 2.36 |
| GF + GA per match | 4.00 | 3.17 | 3.55 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 100% | 83% | 91% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 100% | 67% | 82% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 60% | 50% | 55% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 60% | 33% | 45% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 40% | 33% | 36% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 20% | 33% | 27% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 60% | 83% | 73% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 20% | 50% | 36% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 0% | 17% | 9% |
| Grasshopper over 2.5 stats indicate a 55% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is lower than the league average value of 74% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in Super League. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 20% | 33% | 27% |
| Won-to-nil | 20% | 17% | 18% |
| Failed to score | 20% | 17% | 18% |
| Lost-to-nil | 20% | 0% | 9% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 80% | 83% | 82% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 60% | 50% | 55% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 60% | 33% | 45% |
| Scored in both halves | 40% | 0% | 18% |
| Both teams scored | 60% | 67% | 64% |
| Conceding Rate | 80% | 67% | 73% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 20% | 67% | 45% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 80% | 50% | 64% |
| Conceded in both halves | 20% | 50% | 36% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 80% | 83% | 82% |
| GF over 1.5 | 60% | 17% | 36% |
| GF over 2.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 80% | 67% | 73% |
| GA over 1.5 | 80% | 50% | 64% |
| GA over 2.5 | 40% | 33% | 36% |
| GA over 3.5 | 40% | 33% | 36% |
| GA over 4.5 | 20% | 33% | 27% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Grasshopper matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 0% | 17% | 9% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 0% | 17% | 9% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 40% | 17% | 27% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 0% | 17% | 9% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 20% | 0% | 9% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 40% | 33% | 36% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 0% | 33% | 18% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 40% | 33% | 36% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 60% | 33% | 45% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Away wins | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Home & Away defeats | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
|
A majority of Grasshopper's defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (5 defeats), while 1 of their defeats had a one-goal margin. |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 44% | 56% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | |
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 0.80 |
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 0.83 |
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | -0.03 |
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 54% | 46% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 50% | 50% | ||
| League average | 52% | 48% | ||
|
Matches played at home have accounted for only 44% of Grasshopper's total points and 54% of the goals they have scored so far this season in Super League. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 2 | 1 | 3 | 27% |
| Drawing at HT | 3 | 3 | 6 | 55% |
| Losing at HT | 0 | 2 | 2 | 18% |
| Total | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Corners For
| Avg | 2.5+ | 3.5+ | 4.5+ | 5.5+ | 6.5+ | |
| Home | 4.40 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| Away | 5.50 | 83% | 83% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| Total | 5.00 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 36% |
Corners Against
| Avg | 2.5+ | 3.5+ | 4.5+ | 5.5+ | 6.5+ | |
| Home | 6.40 | 100% | 100% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
| Away | 6.17 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 33% | 33% |
| Total | 6.27 | 100% | 100% | 82% | 27% | 27% |
Total corners (team + opponents)
| Avg | 9.5+ | 10.5+ | 11.5+ | 12.5+ | 13.5+ | |
| Home | 10.80 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| Away | 11.67 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 50% | 33% |
| Total | 11.27 | 55% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 27% |
| The average of 11.27 total corners for Grasshopper refers to how the corner stats evaluate the total number of corners per match (corners awarded + corners conceded) in matches involving the team this season in Super League. | ||||||
| Corner Stats for all teams | ||||||
Goal times
|
Grasshopper |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 7 | 54% | |
| GA | 7 | 27% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 6 | 46% | |
| GA | 19 | 73% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 49 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 56 |
|
Grasshopper |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 3 | 43% | |
| GA | 1 | 8% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 4 | 57% | |
| GA | 12 | 92% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 52 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 65 |
|
Grasshopper |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 4 | 67% | |
| GA | 6 | 46% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 2 | 33% | |
| GA | 7 | 54% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 45 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 47 |
Grasshopper scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| This season in the league |
|
Grasshopper have failed to win in their last 4 matches. 73% of Grasshopper's conceded goals occurred in the second half. Grasshopper have lost their last 2 home matches. Grasshopper have conceded a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 3 home matches. View comments for all teams |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsMatch total goals stats
Match total goals statsMatch total goals stats (last 8 matches)
Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)Match total goals stats (at home)
Match total goals stats (at home)Match total goals stats (away)
Match total goals stats (away)Example
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
