| Home | Away | Total | |
| Played | 5 | 5 | 10 |
| Points Per Game | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Select Favourite Stats | |||
| View Favourite Stats for all teams | |||
 |
Angel City W |
(this season in the league) |
Angel City W's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 16 Mar | Angel City W |
1 - 1
0-1 Gia Corley (5) --------------------------------------- 1-1 A. Thompson (54) |
San Diego W. W | - | - | - | 0-1 | stats |
| 22 Mar | Portland T. W |
1 - 1
0-1 Kennedy Fuller (9) 1-1 Reilyn Turner (30) |
Angel City W | - | - | - | 1-1 | stats |
| 31 Mar | Angel City W |
2 - 1
1-0 A. Thompson (8) 1-1 Ji So-Yun (12) pen. --------------------------------------- 2-1 Riley Tiernan (63) |
Seattle Reign W | + | - | - | 1-1 | stats |
| 12 Apr | Houston Dash W |
1 - 3
0-1 Macey Kamryn Hodge (13) 0-2 Riley Tiernan (29) --------------------------------------- 1-2 Bárbara Olivieri (61) 1-3 A. Thompson (86) |
Angel City W | + | - | - | 0-2 | stats |
| 19 Apr | Angel City W |
0 - 4
0-1 Esther González (18) --------------------------------------- 0-2 Miyabi Moriya (o.g.) (67) 0-3 Esther González (75) 0-4 Geyse da Silva (85) |
Gotham FC W | + | - | + | 0-1 | stats |
| 26 Apr | Orlando Pride W |
3 - 2
0-1 Riley Tiernan (9) 0-2 Katie Zelem (44) --------------------------------------- 1-2 Marta (71) 2-2 Barbra Banda (76) 3-2 Mary Alice Vignola (o.g.) (90) |
Angel City W | + | - | - | 0-2 | stats |
| 3 May | Washington S. W |
3 - 4
0-1 Riley Tiernan (8) 0-2 G. Thompson (22) 1-2 Esme Morgan (30) 2-2 Gift Monday (40) --------------------------------------- 2-3 Katie Zelem (72) 3-3 Esme Morgan (89) 3-4 Riley Tiernan (90) |
Angel City W | + | - | - | 2-2 | stats |
| 10 May | Angel City W |
2 - 0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Christen Press (66) 2-0 A. Thompson (90) |
Utah Royals W | - | + | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 18 May | Bay FC W |
2 - 0
1-0 Penelope Hocking (23) 2-0 Caroline Conti (28) pen. |
Angel City W | - | - | + | 2-0 | stats |
| 25 May | Angel City W |
2 - 3
0-1 Taylor Kornieck (23) pen. --------------------------------------- 1-1 Riley Tiernan (48) 1-2 E. Sears (53) 1-3 Savannah DeMelo (56) 2-3 A. Thompson (68) pen. |
R. Louisville W | + | - | - | 0-1 | stats |
| Filter Angel City W results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 8 Jun | Angel City W | h2h | Chicago RS W | 1.40 | 0.80 | |
| 15 Jun | Angel City W | h2h | N. Carolina W | 1.40 | 1.00 | |
| 21 Jun | KC Current W | h2h | Angel City W | 3.00 | 1.40 | |
| 2 Aug | Seattle Reign W | h2h | Angel City W | 1.17 | 1.40 | |
| 10 Aug | San Diego W. W | h2h | Angel City W | 2.00 | 1.40 | |
| 16 Aug | Utah Royals W | h2h | Angel City W | 0.80 | 1.40 | |
| 22 Aug | Angel City W | h2h | Orlando Pride W | 1.40 | 2.00 | |
| 2 Sep | Angel City W | h2h | Bay FC W | 1.40 | 0.83 | |
| 7 Sep | Gotham FC W | h2h | Angel City W | 1.00 | 1.40 | |
| 13 Sep | N. Carolina W | h2h | Angel City W | 1.40 | 1.40 | |
| 19 Sep | Angel City W | h2h | Washington S. W | 1.40 | 3.00 | |
| 27 Sep | R. Louisville W | h2h | Angel City W | 0.80 | 1.40 | |
| 7 Oct | Angel City W | h2h | KC Current W | 1.40 | 2.00 | |
| 12 Oct | Angel City W | h2h | Houston Dash W | 1.40 | 2.00 | |
| 19 Oct | Angel City W | h2h | Portland T. W | 1.40 | 1.40 | |
| 1 Nov | Chicago RS W | h2h | Angel City W | 0.00 | 1.40 | |
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.45 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
Run-in overview | ||||||
|
Of their 16 remaining matches in the league, Angel City W will be playing as many matches at home and away (8 in each case).
Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, Angel City W's remaining home matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining away matches.
Angel City W's opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 1.63 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that Angel City W will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 1.27 Points Per Game at home in the league. | ||||||
| View opponents PPG values for all teams | ||||||
| Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
Angel City W (10 matches) compared to league average
Angel City W at home (5 matches) compared to league average at home
Angel City W away (5 matches) compared to league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Angel City W goals statistics indicate an average of 1.70 goals scored per game so far this season, which is higher than the average number of 1.39 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in the league. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Angel City W | |
| Leading & trailing stats (total) | (this season in the league) |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 6 / 10 | 60% | |
| Opponent scored first | 4 / 10 | 40% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at half-time | 2 / 10 | 20% | |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 4 / 10 | 40% | |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 26.9 min. | 30% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 38.1 min. | 42% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 25.0 min. | 28% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Angel City W have been in the lead for an average duration of 26.9 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 25.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Angel City W | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | (this season in the league) |
| Matches played | 10 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 9 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 5 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 44% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 6 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 2 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 33% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 6 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 8 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
Angel City W have taken the lead 9 times and have conceded an equalizer on 5 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 44% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 56%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 6 times that Angel City W's opponents have taken the lead, Angel City W have managed to score an equalizer on 2 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 33%.
|
Angel City W | |
| Leading & trailing stats (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 2 / 5 | 40% | |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 5 | 60% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at half-time | 0 / 5 | 0% | |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 3 / 5 | 60% | |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 11.0 min. | 12% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 42.4 min. | 47% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 36.6 min. | 41% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Angel City W have been in the lead for an average duration of 11.0 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 36.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Angel City W | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| Matches played | 5 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 3 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 1 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 67% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 4 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 2 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 2 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 4 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Angel City W have taken the lead 3 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 67% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 33%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 4 times that Angel City W's opponents have taken the lead when Angel City W were playing at home, Angel City W have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 50%.
|
Angel City W | |
| Leading & trailing stats (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 4 / 5 | 80% | |
| Opponent scored first | 1 / 5 | 20% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at half-time | 2 / 5 | 40% | |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 1 / 5 | 20% | |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 42.8 min. | 48% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 33.8 min. | 38% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 13.4 min. | 15% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Angel City W have been in the lead for an average duration of 42.8 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 13.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Angel City W | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| Matches played | 5 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 6 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 4 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 33% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 2 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 0 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 0% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 4 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 4 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Angel City W have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 33% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 67%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 2 times that Angel City W's opponents have taken the lead when Angel City W were playing away, Angel City W have managed to score an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 0%.
Results table
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 7 | 10 | 17 |
| GF per match | 1.40 | 2.00 | 1.70 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 9 | 10 | 19 |
| GA per match | 1.80 | 2.00 | 1.90 |
| GF + GA per match | 3.20 | 4.00 | 3.60 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 60% | 60% | 60% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 40% | 60% | 50% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 20% | 40% | 30% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 20% | 100% | 60% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| Angel City W over 2.5 stats indicate a 60% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is higher than the league average value of 47% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in the league. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Won-to-nil | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Failed to score | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| Lost-to-nil | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 80% | 80% | 80% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-Half | 20% | 80% | 50% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-Half | 80% | 40% | 60% |
| Scored in both halves | 20% | 40% | 30% |
| Both teams scored | 60% | 80% | 70% |
| Conceding Rate | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 80% | 60% | 70% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 40% | 60% | 50% |
| Conceded in both halves | 40% | 20% | 30% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 80% | 80% | 80% |
| GF over 1.5 | 60% | 60% | 60% |
| GF over 2.5 | 0% | 40% | 20% |
| GF over 3.5 | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| GA over 1.5 | 40% | 60% | 50% |
| GA over 2.5 | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| GA over 3.5 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Angel City W matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 20% | 40% | 30% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 60% | 40% | 50% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 40% | 60% | 50% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Away wins | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Away defeats | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Angel City W have obtained as many one-goal margin wins as wins with a margin of 2 goals or more (2 wins for each). Angel City W have conceded as many one-goal margin defeats as defeats with a margin of 2 goals or more (2 defeats for each). | ||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 50% | 50% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | ||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.40 | |||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.40 | |||
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | 0.00 | |||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored (GF) | 41% | 59% | ||
| % Goals conceded (GA) | 47% | 53% | ||
| League average (% goals) | 49% | 51% | ||
| Matches played at home have accounted for 50% of Angel City W's total points and only 41% of the goals they have scored so far this season in the league. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 0 | 2 | 2 | 20% |
| Drawing at HT | 2 | 2 | 4 | 40% |
| Losing at HT | 3 | 1 | 4 | 40% |
| Total | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
Angel City W |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 8 | 47% | |
| GA | 9 | 47% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 9 | 53% | |
| GA | 10 | 53% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 46 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 49 |
|
Angel City W |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 1 | 14% | |
| GA | 4 | 44% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 6 | 86% | |
| GA | 5 | 56% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 57 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 44 |
|
Angel City W |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 7 | 70% | |
| GA | 5 | 50% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 3 | 30% | |
| GA | 5 | 50% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 38 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 54 |
Angel City W scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This season in the league |
| Angel City W have scored 29% of their goals in the first 15 minutes. |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsTotal match goals stats
Total match goals stats (last 8 matches)
Total match goals stats (at home)
Total match goals stats (away)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
