SoccerSTATS.com back to top
LEAGUES MATCHES STATS FAV BLOG LOGIN






advertisement
usa3
USA - USL League One
LATEST MATCHES FORM TABLES HEAD-TO-HEAD GOALS HALF-TIME TIMING FIRST GOAL FAVOURITE STATS
🔍
advertisement

Chattanooga RW stats




 flag

Chattanooga Red Wolves

(this season in the league)

Latest matches

21 Jun Greenville - Chattanooga RW h2h
14 Jun Naples - Chattanooga RW 2 - 2

1-0   Justin Weiss (33)

     1-1   Michael Knapp (36)

2-1   Justin Weiss (41)

     2-2   Pedro Hernandez (43)

7 Jun Chattanooga RW - Portland Hearts 2 - 1

     0-1   Azaad Liadi (5)

1-1   Declan Watters (28)

2-1   Pedro Hernandez (35)

24 May Tormenta - Chattanooga RW 1 - 2

     0-1   Zahir Vasquez (12)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Pedro Hernandez (69)

1-2   Handwalla Bwana (87)
14 May Chattanooga RW - Naples 3 - 1

     0-1   Jayden Onen (10)

1-1   Pedro Hernandez (42)

---------------------------------------
2-1   Michael Knapp (85)

3-1   Matthew Bentley (90)
10 May Chattanooga RW - Richmond K. 0 - 0

19 Apr Chattanooga RW - Greenville 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Zahir Vasquez (53)
13 Apr Alta - Chattanooga RW 3 - 2

     0-1   Matthew Bentley (4) pen.

1-1   Jimmie Villalobos (12)

2-1   Jimmie Villalobos (37)

---------------------------------------
     2-2   Matthew Bentley (78)

3-2   Joaquin Acuna (86) pen.
5 Apr Chattanooga RW - Tormenta 2 - 2

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Mason Tunbridge (52) pen.

1-1   Omar Hernandez (60) pen.

     1-2   Sebastián Vivas (77)

2-2   Matthew Bentley (88) pen.

Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L   W D L %
  Home 5 3 2 0  
  Away 5 1 3 1  
  Total 10 4 5 1  
PPG (Home): 2.20
PPG (Away): 1.20
Points per game: 1.70

Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game1.70 1.88 +10.6%
AVG Goals For1.50 1.75 +16.7%
AVG Goals Against1.10 1.25 +13.6%

Chattanooga RW's progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Form

With the 2-2 away draw at Naples, Chattanooga Red Wolves shared the points, extending their unbeaten run to 6 matches in the league. The team has won 4 of their last 8 matches in the league. Chattanooga RW have scored an average of 1.50 goals per game since the beginning of the season in the league. As for Chattanooga RW's current form, the form statistics indicate an average number of goals scored per game of 1.75 in the last 8 league matches, which is 16.7% higher than their current season's average.





Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
9 Mar Naples 1 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Omar Hernandez (47)

1-1   A. Jaramillo (77) pen.
Chattanooga RW - - - 0-0 stats
28 Mar Charlotte I. 0 - 0

Chattanooga RW - + + 0-0 stats
5 Apr Chattanooga RW 2 - 2

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Mason Tunbridge (52) pen.

1-1   Omar Hernandez (60) pen.

     1-2   Sebastián Vivas (77)

2-2   Matthew Bentley (88) pen.
Tormenta + - - 0-0 stats
13 Apr Alta 3 - 2

     0-1   Matthew Bentley (4) pen.

1-1   Jimmie Villalobos (12)

2-1   Jimmie Villalobos (37)

---------------------------------------
     2-2   Matthew Bentley (78)

3-2   Joaquin Acuna (86) pen.
Chattanooga RW + - - 2-1 stats
19 Apr Chattanooga RW 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Zahir Vasquez (53)
Greenville - + - 0-0 stats
10 May Chattanooga RW 0 - 0

Richmond K. - + + 0-0 stats
14 May Chattanooga RW 3 - 1

     0-1   Jayden Onen (10)

1-1   Pedro Hernandez (42)

---------------------------------------
2-1   Michael Knapp (85)

3-1   Matthew Bentley (90)
Naples + - - 1-1 stats
24 May Tormenta 1 - 2

     0-1   Zahir Vasquez (12)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Pedro Hernandez (69)

1-2   Handwalla Bwana (87)
Chattanooga RW + - - 0-1 stats
7 Jun Chattanooga RW 2 - 1

     0-1   Azaad Liadi (5)

1-1   Declan Watters (28)

2-1   Pedro Hernandez (35)

Portland Hearts + - - 2-1 stats
14 Jun Naples 2 - 2

1-0   Justin Weiss (33)

     1-1   Michael Knapp (36)

2-1   Justin Weiss (41)

     2-2   Pedro Hernandez (43)

Chattanooga RW + - - 2-2 stats
Filter Chattanooga Red Wolves results
 


advertisement


Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
21 Jun Greenville - Chattanooga RW 1.29 1.20
5 Jul Chattanooga RW - One Knoxville 2.20 1.71
12 Jul Richmond K. - Chattanooga RW 1.33 1.20
16 Jul Chattanooga RW - Texoma 2.20 1.25
19 Jul Chattanooga RW - Spokane V. 2.20 2.50
1 Aug Westchester SC - Chattanooga RW 0.75 1.20
6 Aug Chattanooga RW - Forward Madison 2.20 1.00
10 Aug Union Omaha - Chattanooga RW 2.00 1.20
17 Aug Texoma - Chattanooga RW 1.00 1.20
23 Aug Chattanooga RW - Tormenta 2.20 0.67
30 Aug Chattanooga RW - Alta 2.20 0.33
6 Sep Chattanooga RW - Charlotte I. 2.20 1.67
13 Sep Portland Hearts - Chattanooga RW 2.00 1.20
21 Sep Spokane V. - Chattanooga RW 1.88 1.20
27 Sep Chattanooga RW - Union Omaha 2.20 1.00
1 Oct One Knoxville - Chattanooga RW 1.00 1.20
4 Oct Chattanooga RW - Greenville 2.20 0.25
11 Oct Forward Madison - Chattanooga RW 0.75 1.20
17 Oct Charlotte I. - Chattanooga RW 2.20 1.20
25 Oct Chattanooga RW - Westchester SC 2.20 1.00
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.28

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 

Run-in overview

Of their 20 remaining matches in the league, Chattanooga RW will be playing as many matches at home and away (10 in each case). Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, Chattanooga RW's remaining away matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining home matches.
Chattanooga RW's opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 1.14 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that Chattanooga Red Wolves will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 1.42 Points Per Game at home in the league.
View opponents PPG values for all teams
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins 2--
Consecutive draws -11
Consecutive defeats ---
No win -11
No draw 2--
No defeat 526
1 goal scored or more 234
1 goal conceded or more 234
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded ---
GF+GA over 2.5 234
GF+GA under 2.5 ---
Scored at least twice 234
Current Sequences table










Comparison with league average


Chattanooga RW (10 matches) compared to league average

(overall)Chattanooga RW League AVG
Points per game  1.70 1.31
% Wins  40% 31%
% Draws  50% 38%
% Defeats  10% 31%
Goals scored per game  1.50 1.34
Goals conceded per game  1.10 1.34
% Clean sheets  30% 24%
% Failed To Score  20% 24%
% Won To Nil  10% 14%
% Lost To Nil  0% 14%
% Team scored first  40% 45%
% Opponent scored first  40% 45%
Average minute scored first  29 28
Average minute conceded first  25 28
Lead-defending rate  67% 47%
Equalizing rate  88% 53%
% Time leading  24% 24%
% Time level in goals  63% 53%
% Time trailing  14% 24%
PPG when scored first  1.75 1.91
PPG when conceded first  2.00 0.78
Total goals per game  2.60 2.68
% over 1.5 goals  70% 73%
% over 2.5 goals  60% 51%
% over 3.5 goals  40% 32%
% both teams scored  70% 62%

Chattanooga RW at home (5 matches) compared to league average at home

(home matches)Chattanooga RW League AVG
Points per game  2.20 1.48
% Wins  60% 37%
% Draws  40% 38%
% Defeats  0% 25%
Goals scored per game  1.60 1.41
Goals conceded per game  0.80 1.27
% Clean sheets  40% 25%
% Failed To Score  20% 23%
% Won To Nil  20% 15%
% Lost To Nil  0% 13%
% Team scored first  20% 48%
% Opponent scored first  60% 42%
Average minute scored first  53 30
Average minute conceded first  22 24
Lead-defending rate  100% 49%
Equalizing rate  100% 56%
% Time leading  22% 26%
% Time level in goals  62% 53%
% Time trailing  16% 22%
PPG when scored first  3.00 2.06
PPG when conceded first  2.33 0.93
Total goals per game  2.40 2.68
% over 1.5 goals  60% 73%
% over 2.5 goals  60% 51%
% over 3.5 goals  40% 32%
% both teams scored  60% 62%

Chattanooga RW away (5 matches) compared to league average away

(away matches)Chattanooga RW League AVG
Points per game  1.20 1.14
% Wins  20% 25%
% Draws  60% 38%
% Defeats  20% 37%
Goals scored per game  1.40 1.27
Goals conceded per game  1.40 1.41
% Clean sheets  20% 23%
% Failed To Score  20% 25%
% Won To Nil  0% 13%
% Lost To Nil  0% 15%
% Team scored first  60% 42%
% Opponent scored first  20% 48%
Average minute scored first  21 24
Average minute conceded first  33 30
Lead-defending rate  33% 44%
Equalizing rate  75% 51%
% Time leading  26% 22%
% Time level in goals  63% 53%
% Time trailing  11% 26%
PPG when scored first  1.33 1.73
PPG when conceded first  1.00 0.65
Total goals per game  2.80 2.68
% over 1.5 goals  80% 73%
% over 2.5 goals  60% 51%
% over 3.5 goals  40% 32%
% both teams scored  80% 62%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.
Chattanooga Red Wolves goals statistics indicate an average of 1.50 goals scored per game so far this season, which is higher than the average number of 1.34 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in the league.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Chattanooga RW
 Leading & trailing stats (total) (this season in the league) 

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 4 / 10 40%
  Opponent scored first 4 / 10 40%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at half-time 2 / 10 20%
  Opponent was leading at half-time 1 / 10 10%

  LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 21.3 min. 24%
  Average minutes level in goals 56.3 min. 63%
  Average minutes trailing 12.4 min. 14%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Chattanooga Red Wolves have been in the lead for an average duration of 21.3 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 12.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Chattanooga RW
 Equalizer goals (total) (this season in the league) 

  Matches played 10

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 6
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 67%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  Goals giving the lead to the opponent 8
  Equalizer goals scored 7
  Equalizing rate * (2) 88%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 2
  Non-crucial goals conceded 1

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:

Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded

Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored


For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:

Points Won/Lost


Lead-defending ability
Chattanooga Red Wolves have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 67% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 33%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 8 times that Chattanooga RW's opponents have taken the lead, Chattanooga RW have managed to score an equalizer on 7 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 88%.


 flag Chattanooga RW
 Leading & trailing stats (home) (this season in the league, home matches) 

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 1 / 5 20%
  Opponent scored first 3 / 5 60%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at half-time 1 / 5 20%
  Opponent was leading at half-time 0 / 5 0%

  LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 19.4 min. 22%
  Average minutes level in goals 55.8 min. 62%
  Average minutes trailing 14.8 min. 16%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Chattanooga RW have been in the lead for an average duration of 19.4 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 14.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Chattanooga RW
 Equalizer goals (home) (this season in the league, home matches) 

  Matches played 5

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 3
  Equalizer goals conceded 0
  Lead defending rate * (1) 100%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  Goals giving the lead to the opponent 4
  Equalizer goals scored 4
  Equalizing rate * (2) 100%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 1
  Non-crucial goals conceded 0

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:

Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded

Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored


For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:

Points Won/Lost


Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Chattanooga RW have taken the lead 3 times and have conceded an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 100% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 0%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 4 times that Chattanooga RW's opponents have taken the lead when Chattanooga RW were playing at home, Chattanooga RW have managed to score an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 100%.



 flag Chattanooga RW
 Leading & trailing stats (away) (this season in the league, away matches) 

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 3 / 5 60%
  Opponent scored first 1 / 5 20%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at half-time 1 / 5 20%
  Opponent was leading at half-time 1 / 5 20%

  LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 23.2 min. 26%
  Average minutes level in goals 56.8 min. 63%
  Average minutes trailing 10.0 min. 11%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Chattanooga RW have been in the lead for an average duration of 23.2 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 10.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Chattanooga RW
 Equalizer goals (away) (this season in the league, away matches) 

  Matches played 5

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 3
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 33%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  Goals giving the lead to the opponent 4
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 75%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 1
  Non-crucial goals conceded 1

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:

Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded

Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored


For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:

Points Won/Lost


Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Chattanooga RW have taken the lead 3 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 33% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 67%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 4 times that Chattanooga RW's opponents have taken the lead when Chattanooga RW were playing away, Chattanooga RW have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 75%.


advertisement



Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Spokane V. 12 25     h2h
   
2 Charlotte I. 11 21   0 - 0 h2h
   
3 Naples 12 19 3 - 1 1 - 1 h2h
  2 - 2
4 Chattanooga RW 10 17
5 One Knoxville 8 13     h2h
   
6 Richmond K. 12 13 0 - 0   h2h
   
7 Alta 9 12   3 - 2 h2h
   
8 Texoma 11 12     h2h
   
9 Union Omaha 9 11     h2h
   
10 Greenville 11 10 1 - 0   h2h
   
11 Forward Madison 10 9     h2h
   
12 Portland Hearts 8 8 2 - 1   h2h
   
13 Westchester SC 9 8     h2h
   
14 Tormenta 10 8 2 - 2 1 - 2 h2h
   

Chattanooga RW stats rank the team in 4th position in the the league table with 17 points, 2 points behind Naples. The above table shows Chattanooga RW results against each league opponent. The tables below provide additional statistics regarding Chattanooga RW's season in the league.









Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 8 715
GF per match 1.601.40 1.50
Goals conceded (GA) 4711
GA per match 0.801.40 1.10
GF + GA per match 2.402.802.60
GF+GA over 0.5 80%80%80%
GF+GA over 1.5 60%80%70%
GF+GA over 2.5 60%60%60%
GF+GA over 3.5 40%40%40%
GF+GA over 4.5 0%20%10%
GF+GA over 5.5 0%0%0%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 40%60%50%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 40%40%40%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 20%40%30%
Chattanooga Red Wolves over 2.5 stats indicate a 60% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is higher than the league average value of 51% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in the league.
League goals statistics








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 40%20%30%
Won-to-nil 20%0%10%
Failed to score 20%20%20%
Lost-to-nil 0%0%0%
League Scored in Both Halves stats








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 80%80%80%
Scoring Rate 1st-Half 40%60%50%
Scoring Rate 2nd-Half 60%60%60%
Scored in both halves 20%40%30%
Both teams scored 60%80%70%
Conceding Rate 60%80%70%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 40%40%40%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 20%60%40%
Conceded in both halves 0%20%10%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 80%80%80%
GF over 1.5 60%60%60%
GF over 2.5 20%0%10%
GF over 3.5 0%0%0%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 60%80%70%
GA over 1.5 20%40%30%
GA over 2.5 0%20%10%
GA over 3.5 0%0%0%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Chattanooga RW matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 20%20%20%
Match total goals = 1 20%0%10%
Match total goals = 2 0%20%10%
Match total goals = 3 20%20%20%
Match total goals = 4 40%20%30%
Match total goals = 5+ 0%20%10%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 40%20%30%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 20%40%30%
Match total goals = 4+ 40%40%40%
League Total Goals stats








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  21 00
Away wins  10 00
Home & Away wins  31 00
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  00 00
Away defeats  10 00
Home & Away defeats  10 00


A majority of Chattanooga RW's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (3 wins), while 1 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more.
League Goal Margin stats









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 65%
35%


Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)2.20
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)1.20
 Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) +1.00


Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored (GF) 53%
47%
  % Goals conceded (GA) 36%
64%
  League average (% goals) 53%
47%

Matches played at home have accounted for 65% of Chattanooga RW's total points and 53% of the goals they have scored so far this season in the league.
League Home / Away tables







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 11 2  20%
Drawing at HT 43 7  70%
Losing at HT 01 1  10%
  Total 5510
League Half-time stats







Goal times


 flag Chattanooga RW
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 2
GA 3
16-30 GF 1
GA 0
31-45 GF 4
GA 3
46-60 GF 3
GA 1
61-75 GF 1
GA 0
76-90 GF 4
GA 4
1st Half GF 7
47%
GA 6
55%
2nd Half GF 8
53%
GA 5
45%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 51
 Avg. minute goals conceded 47


  Chattanooga RW
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 0
GA 2
16-30 GF 1
GA 0
31-45 GF 2
GA 0
46-60 GF 2
GA 1
61-75 GF 0
GA 0
76-90 GF 3
GA 1
1st Half GF 3
38%
GA 2
50%
2nd Half GF 5
62%
GA 2
50%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 60
  Avg. minute goals conceded 36


  Chattanooga RW
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 2
GA 1
16-30 GF 0
GA 0
31-45 GF 2
GA 3
46-60 GF 1
GA 0
61-75 GF 1
GA 0
76-90 GF 1
GA 3
1st Half GF 4
57%
GA 4
57%
2nd Half GF 3
43%
GA 3
43%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 41
  Avg. minute goals conceded 53

League Goal Times








Chattanooga RW scores

FT at home
2-2 1 20%
3-1 1 20%
2-1 1 20%
1-0 1 20%
0-0 1 20%
FT away
3-2 1 20%
2-2 1 20%
1-2 1 20%
1-1 1 20%
0-0 1 20%
Half-time at home
0-0 3 60%
2-1 1 20%
1-1 1 20%
Half-time away
0-0 2 40%
2-2 1 20%
2-1 1 20%
0-1 1 20%






This season in the league
Chattanooga RW have been undefeated in their last 6 matches. Chattanooga RW have scored 2 goals or more in each of their last 4 matches. Chattanooga RW have scored 2 goals or more in each of their last 3 away matches. 27% of Chattanooga RW's conceded goals occurred in the first 15 minutes. 36% of Chattanooga RW's conceded goals occurred after the 75th minute.







Tables overview

League table

GP pts
Spokane V. 12 25
Charlotte I. 11 21
Naples 12 19
Chattanooga RW 10 17
One Knoxville 8 13
Richmond K. 12 13
Alta 9 12
Texoma 11 12
Union Omaha 9 11
Greenville 11 10
Forward Madi. 10 9
Portland Hea. 8 8
Westchester SC 9 8
Tormenta 10 8

Form table (last 8)

GP pts
Spokane V. 8 20
Charlotte I. 8 17
Chattanooga RW 8 15
One Knoxville 8 13
Alta 8 12
Texoma 8 12
Naples 8 11
Union Omaha 8 11
Portland Hea. 8 8
Richmond K. 8 7
Westchester SC 8 7
Forward Madi. 8 6
Greenville 8 6
Tormenta 8 5

Home

GP pts
Spokane V. 8 15
Naples 7 12
Charlotte I. 5 11
Chattanooga RW 5 11
Alta 6 11
Greenville 7 9
Richmond K. 6 8
Texoma 7 7
Tormenta 7 6
Portland Hea. 2 4
Union Omaha 2 4
Westchester SC 4 3
Forward Madi. 4 3
One Knoxville 1 1

Away

GP pts
One Knoxville 7 12
Spokane V. 4 10
Charlotte I. 6 10
Naples 5 7
Union Omaha 7 7
Chattanooga RW 5 6
Forward Madi. 6 6
Richmond K. 6 5
Westchester SC 5 5
Texoma 4 5
Portland Hea. 6 4
Tormenta 3 2
Greenville 4 1
Alta 3 1

Offence

GP GF
Richmond K. 12 20
Spokane V. 12 20
Charlotte I. 11 19
Naples 12 17
Chattanooga RW 10 15
Westchester SC 9 15
Tormenta 10 14
Texoma 11 13
Alta 9 11
Greenville 11 11
One Knoxville 8 10
Union Omaha 9 9
Forward Madi. 10 8
Portland Hea. 8 8

Defence

GP GA
Spokane V. 12 8
One Knoxville 8 8
Portland Hea. 8 9
Forward Madi. 10 11
Chattanooga RW 10 11
Union Omaha 9 12
Naples 12 12
Alta 9 12
Charlotte I. 11 13
Greenville 11 15
Westchester SC 9 18
Tormenta 10 20
Richmond K. 12 20
Texoma 11 21






Total Match Goals stats


Total match goals stats

Matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Westchester SC  9 3.67 100% 100% 56% 56% 22% 11% 89% 0% 11% 0% 11%
Tormenta  10 3.40 100% 90% 70% 50% 20% 10% 70% 10% 20% 10% 20%
Richmond K.  12 3.33 92% 67% 67% 42% 25% 25% 67% 17% 25% 8% 17%
Texoma  11 3.09 91% 82% 64% 36% 18% 9% 64% 18% 27% 9% 18%
Charlotte I.  11 2.91 91% 73% 45% 36% 27% 9% 64% 27% 18% 18% 9%
Chattanooga RW  10 2.60 80% 70% 60% 40% 10% 0% 70% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Alta  9 2.56 78% 78% 56% 33% 11% 0% 56% 33% 33% 11% 11%
Naples  12 2.42 92% 75% 50% 25% 0% 0% 58% 33% 17% 25% 8%
Greenville  11 2.36 100% 55% 36% 27% 9% 9% 36% 18% 45% 18% 45%
Spokane V.  12 2.33 83% 58% 50% 33% 8% 0% 50% 42% 25% 25% 8%
Union Omaha  9 2.33 89% 56% 56% 33% 0% 0% 44% 33% 33% 22% 22%
One Knoxville  8 2.25 100% 75% 25% 25% 0% 0% 62% 38% 0% 38% 0%
Portland Hearts  8 2.13 75% 75% 50% 12% 0% 0% 75% 25% 25% 0% 0%
Forward Madison  10 1.90 90% 80% 20% 0% 0% 0% 70% 10% 30% 0% 20%
League average 90.1% 73.2% 50.7% 32.4% 11.3% 5.6% 62.0% 23.9% 23.9% 14.1% 14.1%

Total match goals stats (last 8 matches)

Last 8 matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Westchester SC  8 3.88 100% 100% 62% 62% 25% 12% 88% 0% 12% 0% 12%
Charlotte I.  8 3.75 100% 100% 62% 50% 38% 12% 88% 12% 0% 12% 0%
Richmond K.  8 3.25 88% 62% 62% 38% 25% 25% 62% 25% 25% 12% 12%
Tormenta  8 3.25 100% 88% 75% 50% 12% 0% 75% 0% 25% 0% 25%
Texoma  8 3.13 88% 75% 62% 38% 25% 12% 75% 25% 12% 12% 0%
Chattanooga RW  8 3.00 88% 75% 75% 50% 12% 0% 75% 25% 12% 12% 0%
Naples  8 3.00 100% 88% 75% 38% 0% 0% 75% 12% 12% 12% 12%
Alta  8 2.63 75% 75% 62% 38% 12% 0% 62% 38% 25% 12% 0%
Spokane V.  8 2.38 88% 62% 50% 25% 12% 0% 62% 38% 12% 25% 0%
One Knoxville  8 2.25 100% 75% 25% 25% 0% 0% 62% 38% 0% 38% 0%
Union Omaha  8 2.25 88% 50% 50% 38% 0% 0% 50% 38% 25% 25% 12%
Greenville  8 2.13 100% 38% 25% 25% 12% 12% 38% 12% 50% 12% 50%
Portland Hearts  8 2.13 75% 75% 50% 12% 0% 0% 75% 25% 25% 0% 0%
Forward Madison  8 1.75 88% 75% 12% 0% 0% 0% 75% 12% 25% 0% 12%
League average 91.1% 74.1% 53.6% 34.8% 12.5% 5.4% 68.8% 21.4% 18.8% 12.5% 9.8%

Total match goals stats (at home)

Home matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Richmond K.  6 4.17 100% 83% 83% 50% 33% 33% 83% 17% 0% 17% 0%
Texoma  7 3.43 100% 86% 71% 43% 14% 14% 57% 14% 29% 14% 29%
Westchester SC  4 3.25 100% 100% 50% 50% 25% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Tormenta  7 3.00 100% 86% 57% 29% 14% 14% 57% 14% 29% 14% 29%
Portland Hearts  2 2.50 100% 100% 50% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Spokane V.  8 2.50 88% 62% 50% 38% 12% 0% 62% 25% 25% 12% 12%
Union Omaha  2 2.50 100% 50% 50% 50% 0% 0% 50% 50% 0% 50% 0%
Greenville  7 2.43 100% 71% 43% 29% 0% 0% 43% 29% 29% 29% 29%
Charlotte I.  5 2.40 80% 60% 40% 40% 20% 0% 60% 40% 20% 20% 0%
Chattanooga RW  5 2.40 80% 60% 60% 40% 0% 0% 60% 40% 20% 20% 0%
Naples  7 2.29 86% 71% 43% 29% 0% 0% 57% 29% 29% 14% 14%
Alta  6 2.17 67% 67% 50% 17% 17% 0% 50% 50% 33% 17% 0%
One Knoxville  1 2.00 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Forward Madison  4 1.25 75% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 25% 50% 0% 25%
League average 90.1% 73.2% 50.7% 32.4% 11.3% 5.6% 62.0% 25.4% 22.5% 15.5% 12.7%

Total match goals stats (away)

Away matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Tormenta  3 4.33 100% 100% 100% 100% 33% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Westchester SC  5 4.00 100% 100% 60% 60% 20% 20% 80% 0% 20% 0% 20%
Alta  3 3.33 100% 100% 67% 67% 0% 0% 67% 0% 33% 0% 33%
Charlotte I.  6 3.33 100% 83% 50% 33% 33% 17% 67% 17% 17% 17% 17%
Chattanooga RW  5 2.80 80% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 80% 20% 20% 0% 0%
Naples  5 2.60 100% 80% 60% 20% 0% 0% 60% 40% 0% 40% 0%
Richmond K.  6 2.50 83% 50% 50% 33% 17% 17% 50% 17% 50% 0% 33%
Texoma  4 2.50 75% 75% 50% 25% 25% 0% 75% 25% 25% 0% 0%
Forward Madison  6 2.33 100% 100% 33% 0% 0% 0% 83% 0% 17% 0% 17%
One Knoxville  7 2.29 100% 71% 29% 29% 0% 0% 57% 43% 0% 43% 0%
Union Omaha  7 2.29 86% 57% 57% 29% 0% 0% 43% 29% 43% 14% 29%
Greenville  4 2.25 100% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 0% 75% 0% 75%
Portland Hearts  6 2.00 67% 67% 50% 17% 0% 0% 67% 33% 33% 0% 0%
Spokane V.  4 2.00 75% 50% 50% 25% 0% 0% 25% 75% 25% 50% 0%
League average 90.1% 73.2% 50.7% 32.4% 11.3% 5.6% 62.0% 22.5% 25.4% 12.7% 15.5%




Segments Table

0 pt Segments table progression arrow 25 pts
5th Segment 4th Segment 3rd Segment 2nd Segment 1st Segment
up to 4.6 pts from 4.7 to 9.7 pts from 9.8 to 14.8 pts from 14.9 to 19.9 pts from 20.0 to 25 pts
(10)  9  Forward Madison
(8)  8  Portland Hearts
(9)  8  Westchester SC
(10)  8  Tormenta
(8)  13  One Knoxville
(12)  13  Richmond K.
(9)  12  Alta
(11)  12  Texoma
(9)  11  Union Omaha
(11)  10  Greenville
(12)  19  Naples
(10)  17  Chattanooga RW
(12)  25  Spokane V.
(11)  21  Charlotte I.

The Segments Table is a visual representation splitting the teams into 5 segments. Each team is assigned to a specific segment, depending on the team's number of points. Each of the 5 segments spans one-fifth (20%) of the total points held by the team ranked 1st in the league. For each team, the number of matches played appears in green between brackets, and the number of points is displayed in black.





 

SoccerSTATS.com - Public edition

SoccerSTATS.com provides football statistics, results and blog articles on national and international soccer competitions worldwide. Football fans can keep a tab on stats related to their favourite team or leagues of interest, and access a wide range of team performance data analytics and league standings, not only on the world's most famous professional leagues, but also on amateur and regional leagues over the world. Example of soccer statistics include league standings, form tables, top goal scorers, scoring stats, statistical previews and goal timing statistics.
Follow us on Twitter
F.A.Q. Contact Privacy Policy Change consent
Terms & conditions of use About us Cookie usage and options
Mobile app

Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. Products, services, promotional offers and other offerings from partners and advertisers are subject to terms and conditions. By using this website you certify that you agree with the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy and that you are over the age of 18 or that you have the permission of a parent or guardian to use this website, after your parent or guardian has carefully reviewed and agreed to the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy. The website's content is provided for informational purposes only is not to be relied upon as a professional opinion whatsover. Nothing on this website should be considered as advice. This website is not associated with nor endorsed by any league or competition (whether professional, collegiate or other types of leagues / competitions), federation, association, club or team. All trademarks, brands, images, logos and names appearing on this website belong to their respective owners.
Useful links (third-party websites):   www.gamcare.org.uk       www.begambleaware.org        gamblingtherapy.org
   
Copyright 1998-2025 SoccerSTATS.com
back to top