| Home | Away | Total | |
| Played | 7 | 9 | 16 |
| Points Per Game | 1.00 | 1.33 | 1.19 |
| Select Favourite Stats | |||
| View Favourite Stats for all teams | |||
 |
DC Power W |
(this season in the league) |
DC Power W's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 24 Aug | Sporting JAX W |
1:3
1-0 Jade Pennock (7) 1-1 N/A (38) --------------------------------------- 1-2 N/A (68) 1-3 N/A (75) |
DC Power W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 30 Aug | DC Power W |
2:2
1-0 Emily Colton (25) 1-1 L. Silano (45) 1-2 L. Silano (45) --------------------------------------- 2-2 Sydney Cummings (77) |
Spokane Z. W | + | - | - | 1-2 |
|
| 12 Sep | DC Power W |
0:0
|
Lexington W | - | + | + | 0-0 |
|
| 18 Sep | DC Power W |
2:2
1-0 Loza Abera (19) 2-0 Gianna Gourley (33) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Kelsey Hill (59) 2-2 Rebecca Cooke (80) |
Brooklyn W | + | - | - | 2-0 |
|
| 4 Oct | Carolina A. W |
3:2
1-0 M. George (14) 2-0 Maddie Mercado (16) 2-1 Sydney Studer (o.g.) (39) --------------------------------------- 2-2 Madison Murnin (49) 3-2 Alyssa Mae Walker (84) |
DC Power W | + | - | - | 2-1 |
|
| 14 Oct | DC Power W |
0:1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Jade Pennock (64) |
Sporting JAX W | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 19 Oct | DC Power W |
1:1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Ally Cook (52) pen. 1-1 Gianna Gourley (90) |
Spokane Z. W | - | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 2 Nov | Dallas T. W |
2:3
0-1 Jaydah Bedoya (13) 1-1 Camryn Lancaster (20) --------------------------------------- 1-2 Susanna Friedrichs (70) 1-3 Gianna Gourley (78) 2-3 Gracie Brian (85) |
DC Power W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 8 Nov | Brooklyn W |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Leah Scarpelli (49) |
DC Power W | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 13 Nov | DC Power W |
3:1
1-0 Dasia Torbert (21) 2-0 Dasia Torbert (40) 2-1 Ella Simpson (45) --------------------------------------- 3-1 Loza Abera (83) |
F. Lauderdale W | + | - | - | 2-1 |
|
| 22 Nov | DC Power W |
0:1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Rylee Baisden (57) |
Carolina A. W | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 6 Dec | Dallas T. W |
2:1
1-0 Allie Thornton (10) 1-1 Gianna Gourley (21) 2-1 Gracie Brian (33) |
DC Power W | + | - | - | 2-1 |
|
| 13 Dec | Lexington W |
2:2
0-1 Gianna Gourley (21) 1-1 Taylor Aylmer (40) 1-2 Gianna Gourley (45) --------------------------------------- 2-2 McKenzie Weinert (70) |
DC Power W | + | - | - | 1-2 |
|
| 20 Dec | Carolina A. W |
0:0
|
DC Power W | - | + | + | 0-0 |
|
| 7 Feb | Sporting JAX W |
0:1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Alyssa Mae Walker (78) |
DC Power W | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| 15 Feb | Tampa Bay Sun W |
1:1
1-0 J. Fusco (23) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Claire Constant (63) |
DC Power W | - | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| Filter DC Power W results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 22 Oct | DC Power W (pp.) Carolina A. W | 1.00 | 1.50 | |||
| 7 Mar | Brooklyn W vs DC Power W | 1.33 | 1.33 | |||
| 12 Mar | DC Power W vs Dallas T. W | 1.00 | 1.25 | |||
| 17 Mar | DC Power W vs Carolina A. W | 1.00 | 1.50 | |||
| 22 Mar | Spokane Z. W vs DC Power W | 1.00 | 1.33 | |||
| 26 Mar | DC Power W vs Tampa Bay Sun W | 1.00 | 0.88 | |||
| 1 Apr | DC Power W vs Lexington W | 1.00 | 1.75 | |||
| 4 Apr | F. Lauderdale W vs DC Power W | 0.89 | 1.33 | |||
| 11 Apr | Tampa Bay Sun W vs DC Power W | 0.89 | 1.33 | |||
| 22 Apr | DC Power W vs F. Lauderdale W | 1.00 | 1.22 | |||
| 1 May | DC Power W vs Dallas T. W | 1.00 | 1.25 | |||
| 6 May | DC Power W vs Sporting JAX W | 1.00 | 2.38 | |||
| 10 May | Spokane Z. W vs DC Power W | 1.00 | 1.33 | |||
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.30 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
Run-in overview | ||||||
|
Of their 13 remaining matches in the league, DC Power W will be playing more matches at home (8) than away (5).
Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, DC Power W's remaining home matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining away matches.
DC Power W's opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 1.47 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that DC Power W will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 1.02 Points Per Game at home in the league. | ||||||
| View opponents PPG values for all teams | ||||||
| Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
DC Power W (16 matches) vs league average
DC Power W at home (7 matches) vs league average at home
DC Power W away (9 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DC Power W goals statistics indicate an average of 1.31 goals scored per game so far this season, which is lower than the average number of 1.37 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in the league. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
DC Power W | |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 6 / 16 | 38% | |
| Opponent scored first | 8 / 16 | 50% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 3 / 16 | 19% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 4 / 16 | 25% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 15.9 min. | 18% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 52.2 min. | 58% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 21.9 min. | 24% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, DC Power W have been in the lead for an average duration of 15.9 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 21.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
DC Power W | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 16 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 9 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 5 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 44% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 11 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 6 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 55% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 6 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 4 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
DC Power W have taken the lead 9 times and have conceded an equalizer on 5 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 44% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 56%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 11 times that DC Power W's opponents have taken the lead, DC Power W have managed to score an equalizer on 6 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 55%.
|
DC Power W | |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 3 / 7 | 43% | |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 7 | 43% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 2 / 7 | 29% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 1 / 7 | 14% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 21.4 min. | 24% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 50.1 min. | 56% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 18.4 min. | 20% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, DC Power W have been in the lead for an average duration of 21.4 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 18.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
DC Power W | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 7 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 3 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 2 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 33% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 4 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 2 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 3 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 2 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, DC Power W have taken the lead 3 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 33% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 67%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 4 times that DC Power W's opponents have taken the lead when DC Power W were playing at home, DC Power W have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 50%.
|
DC Power W | |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 3 / 9 | 33% | |
| Opponent scored first | 5 / 9 | 56% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 1 / 9 | 11% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 3 / 9 | 33% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 11.7 min. | 13% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 53.8 min. | 60% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 24.6 min. | 27% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, DC Power W have been in the lead for an average duration of 11.7 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 24.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
DC Power W | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 9 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 6 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 3 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 50% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 7 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 4 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 57% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 3 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 2 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, DC Power W have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 7 times that DC Power W's opponents have taken the lead when DC Power W were playing away, DC Power W have managed to score an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 57%.
Results table
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 8 | 13 | 21 |
| GF per match | 1.14 | 1.44 | 1.31 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 8 | 12 | 20 |
| GA per match | 1.14 | 1.33 | 1.25 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.29 | 2.78 | 2.56 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 86% | 89% | 88% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 57% | 67% | 62% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 43% | 56% | 50% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 43% | 44% | 44% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 0% | 22% | 12% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 43% | 67% | 56% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 43% | 56% | 50% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 29% | 33% | 31% |
| DC Power W over 2.5 stats indicate a 50% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is higher than the league average value of 47% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in the league. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 14% | 22% | 19% |
| Won-to-nil | 0% | 11% | 6% |
| Failed to score | 43% | 22% | 31% |
| Lost-to-nil | 29% | 11% | 19% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 57% | 78% | 69% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 43% | 56% | 50% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 43% | 56% | 50% |
| Scored in both halves | 29% | 33% | 31% |
| Both teams scored | 57% | 67% | 62% |
| Conceding Rate | 86% | 78% | 81% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 29% | 67% | 50% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 57% | 44% | 50% |
| Conceded in both halves | 0% | 33% | 19% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 57% | 78% | 69% |
| GF over 1.5 | 43% | 44% | 44% |
| GF over 2.5 | 14% | 22% | 19% |
| GF over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 86% | 78% | 81% |
| GA over 1.5 | 29% | 44% | 38% |
| GA over 2.5 | 0% | 11% | 6% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in DC Power W matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 14% | 11% | 12% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 29% | 22% | 25% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 14% | 11% | 12% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 0% | 11% | 6% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 43% | 22% | 31% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 0% | 22% | 12% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 43% | 33% | 38% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 14% | 22% | 19% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 43% | 44% | 44% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Away wins | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
DC Power W have obtained as many one-goal margin wins as wins with a margin of 2 goals or more (2 wins for each).
A majority of DC Power W's defeats had a one-goal margin (5 defeats), while 0 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more. |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 37% | 63% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | |
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.00 |
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.33 |
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | -0.33 |
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 38% | 62% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 40% | 60% | ||
| League average | 50% | 50% | ||
|
Matches played at home have accounted for only 37% of DC Power W's total points and only 38% of the goals they have scored so far this season in the league. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 2 | 1 | 3 | 19% |
| Drawing at HT | 4 | 5 | 9 | 56% |
| Losing at HT | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25% |
| Total | 7 | 9 | 16 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
DC Power W |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 11 | 52% | |
| GA | 11 | 55% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 10 | 48% | |
| GA | 9 | 45% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 50 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 45 |
|
DC Power W |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 5 | 62% | |
| GA | 3 | 38% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 3 | 38% | |
| GA | 5 | 62% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 48 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 56 |
|
DC Power W |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 6 | 46% | |
| GA | 8 | 67% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 7 | 54% | |
| GA | 4 | 33% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 51 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 38 |
DC Power W scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| This season in the league |
|
DC Power W have been undefeated in their last 4 matches. DC Power W failed to keep a clean sheet in 6 of their 7 home matches. DC Power W have failed to score in 3 of their 7 home matches. DC Power W have scored in 7 of their 9 away matches. 63% of DC Power W's points have been earned away. DC Power W have scored 62% of their goals away. DC Power W have been undefeated in their last 4 away matches. DC Power W failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 5 home matches. View comments for all teams |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsMatch total goals stats
Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)
Match total goals stats (at home)
Match total goals stats (away)
Example
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
