Australia - NPL Victoria
| AUSTRALIA |
| A-League | stats |
| A-League Women | stats |
| NPL Victoria | |
| NPL Western Australia | stats |
| NPL South Australia | stats |
| NPL Tasmania | stats |
| NPL New South Wales | stats |
Goal times
Goals by 15-min. segment
| Min. | Goals | % goals | |
| 0-15 | 68 | 13.8% | |
| 16-30 | 74 | 15.1% | |
| 31-45 | 79 | 16.1% | |
| 46-60 | 82 | 16.7% | |
| 61-75 | 76 | 15.5% | |
| 76-90 | 112 | 22.8% | |
'31-45' and '76-90' also include added time
Goals by Half
| Goals | % goals | ||
| 1st half | 221 | 45.0% | |
| 2nd half | 270 | 55.0% | |
Match goals average times
| Event | AVG time | Matches | ||
| 1st goal | 26 min. | 141 | 95.9% | |
| 2nd goal | 45 min. | 126 | 85.7% | |
| 3rd goal | 61 min. | 104 | 70.7% | |
| 4th goal | 69 min. | 63 | 42.9% | |
| Any goal | 50 min. | 141 | 95.9% | |
| No goal | - | 6 | 4.1% | |
Early scoring analysis
| Goals 1-15m | Goals 16-90m | |||
| Condition | Matches | Goals | Per match | |
| Any | 147 | 423 | 2.88 | |
| No goal | 91 | 266 | 2.92 | |
| Goal(s) | 56 | 157 | 2.80 | |
'16-90 min.' also includes added time
In 147 matches played in total this season, there have been 423
goals scored between the 16th and the 90th minute, averaging 2.88 per match.
In the 91 matches with no goal scored in the first 15 minutes, there have been 266
goals scored between the 16th and the 90th minute, averaging 2.92 per match.
In the 56 matches with at least one goal scored in the first 15 minutes, there have been 157
goals scored between the 16th and the 90th minute, averaging 2.80 per match.
Only played, non-abandonned matches are taken into account. Any forfeited matches are excluded from these calculations regardless of any awarded score.
Goal timing per team
ScoresFull-time scores
Among the most frequent results so far this season, 1 - 2 full-time scoreline has been recorded for 13 matches. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scores in featured leagues | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All matches Surprise-levels Results filter Results grid |
Tables
League Table
| GP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | last 8 | CS | SR | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | Heidelberg Utd | 21 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 47 | 19 | +28 | 51 |
|
2.43 | 2.50 | 38% | 100% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | Avondale | 21 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 55 | 24 | +31 | 48 |
|
2.29 | 2.25 | 29% | 100% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | Dandenong T. | 21 | 12 | 5 | 4 | 45 | 28 | +17 | 41 |
|
1.95 | 1.50 | 29% | 95% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | Oakleigh C. | 21 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 49 | 31 | +18 | 39 |
|
1.86 | 1.38 | 29% | 95% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | Preston Lions | 21 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 30 | 28 | +2 | 32 |
|
1.52 | 1.38 | 33% | 81% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | Hume City | 21 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 31 |
|
1.48 | 1.00 | 10% | 81% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | Dandenong City | 21 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 38 | 35 | +3 | 29 |
|
1.38 | 1.25 | 19% | 71% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | Green Gully | 21 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 35 | 33 | +2 | 29 |
|
1.38 | 1.38 | 24% | 76% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | St. Albans | 21 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 39 | 41 | -2 | 23 |
|
1.10 | 1.50 | 14% | 95% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 10 | South Melbourne | 21 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 25 | 36 | -11 | 23 |
|
1.10 | 1.75 | 14% | 57% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 | Altona Magic | 21 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 19 | 33 | -14 | 21 |
|
1.00 | 1.25 | 29% | 52% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 12 | M. Victory B | 21 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 32 | 48 | -16 | 15 |
|
0.71 | 0.38 | 10% | 76% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 13 | Port Melbourne | 21 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 20 | 51 | -31 | 15 |
|
0.71 | 1.00 | 14% | 57% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 | Melbourne K. | 21 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 25 | 52 | -27 | 14 |
|
0.67 | 0.63 | 5% | 67% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Average | 21.0 | 8.4 | 4.3 | 8.4 | 35.1 | 35.1 | 0.0 | 29.4 | 1.40 | 1.37 | 21.2% | 78.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| PPG: Points Per Game, Last 8: PPG last 8 matches, CS: Clean Sheets, SR: Scoring Rate |
|
This season in the Australian NPL Victoria league:
Heidelberg Utd are leading the table in the Australian NPL Victoria league and are 3 points clear off Avondale in second position, and 10 points ahead of third-place Dandenong T..
The links in the league standings above allow displaying results and statistics for each team, like Heidelberg Utd stats or Avondale stats while other indicators accessible from the page relate to league-level the league stats and tables. |
| Table generator by date Form tables Wide table Points Won / Lost Lead durations |
Home table
|
Away table
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relative Home / Away Performance
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relative Form
| GP | Pts | Points Per Game | Relative Form | |||||
| Last 8 | All | (PPG last 8 vs PPG all) | ||||||
| 1 | Heidelberg Utd | 21 | 51 | 2.50 | 2.43 | +3% | ||
| 2 | Avondale | 21 | 48 | 2.25 | 2.29 | -2% | ||
| 3 | Dandenong T. | 21 | 41 | 1.50 | 1.95 | -23% | ||
| 4 | Oakleigh C. | 21 | 39 | 1.38 | 1.86 | -26% | ||
| 5 | Preston Lions | 21 | 32 | 1.38 | 1.52 | -9% | ||
| 6 | Hume City | 21 | 31 | 1.00 | 1.48 | -32% | ||
| 7 | Dandenong City | 21 | 29 | 1.25 | 1.38 | -9% | ||
| 8 | Green Gully | 21 | 29 | 1.38 | 1.38 | -0% | ||
| 9 | St. Albans | 21 | 23 | 1.50 | 1.10 | +36% | ||
| 10 | South Melbourne | 21 | 23 | 1.75 | 1.10 | +59% | ||
| 11 | Altona Magic | 21 | 21 | 1.25 | 1.00 | +25% | ||
| 12 | M. Victory B | 21 | 15 | 0.38 | 0.71 | -46% | ||
| 13 | Port Melbourne | 21 | 15 | 1.00 | 0.71 | +41% | ||
| 14 | Melbourne K. | 21 | 14 | 0.63 | 0.67 | -6% | ||
Note: The 'Relative Form' table is calculated based on each team's Points Per Game (PPG) in the last 8 matches and the team's PPG in all matches.
More information is available in the Relative form blog article.
Points Performance Index
| GP | Pts | Team PPG |
Opponents PPG |
Points Performance Index (Team PPG x Opponents PPG) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heidelberg Utd | 21 | 51 | 2.43 |
1.25
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
3.04 | |
| 2 | Avondale | 21 | 48 | 2.29 |
1.30
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
2.98 | |
| 3 | Dandenong T. | 21 | 41 | 1.95 |
1.43
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
2.79 | |
| 4 | Oakleigh C. | 21 | 39 | 1.86 |
1.38
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
2.57 | |
| 5 | Preston Lions | 21 | 32 | 1.52 |
1.44
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
2.19 | |
| 6 | Hume City | 21 | 31 | 1.48 |
1.47
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
2.18 | |
| 7 | Dandenong City | 21 | 29 | 1.38 |
1.44
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.99 | |
| 8 | Green Gully | 21 | 29 | 1.38 |
1.34
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.85 | |
| 9 | St. Albans | 21 | 23 | 1.10 |
1.45
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.60 | |
| 10 | South Melbourne | 21 | 23 | 1.10 |
1.38
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.52 | |
| 11 | Altona Magic | 21 | 21 | 1.00 |
1.46
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.46 | |
| 12 | M. Victory B | 21 | 15 | 0.71 |
1.38
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
0.98 | |
| 13 | Port Melbourne | 21 | 15 | 0.71 |
1.40
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
0.99 | |
| 14 | Melbourne K. | 21 | 14 | 0.67 |
1.45
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
0.97 | |
| Opponents PPG are calculated based on: - Home Points Per Game of opponents faced away - Away Points Per Game of opponents faced at home |
|||||||
More information about the details of each opponent PPG value is visible by hovering the mouse cursor over any of the 'Opponents PPG' values.
Note: The 'Points Performance Index' is calculated by multiplying the team's Points per Game (PPG) by the combined PPG average of their played opponents (Away PPG of opponents played at home and Home PPG of opponents played away).
The table is described in more details in the Relative Performance blog article.
Performance Ratings
| GP | W | D | L | Pts | pPts | Team pPPG |
Opponents pPPG |
Performance Rating Average (Team pPPG vs Opponents pPPG) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heidelberg Utd | 21 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 51 | 17.5 | 83% |
45%
Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away:
|
64.2% | |
| 2 | Avondale | 21 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 48 | 16.5 | 79% |
47%
Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away:
|
62.8% | |
| 3 | Dandenong T. | 21 | 12 | 5 | 4 | 41 | 14.5 | 69% |
51%
Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away:
|
60.0% | |
| 4 | Oakleigh C. | 21 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 39 | 13.5 | 64% |
49%
Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away:
|
56.6% | |
| 5 | Preston Lions | 21 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 32 | 11.5 | 55% |
52%
Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away:
|
53.4% | |
| 6 | Hume City | 21 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 31 | 11.0 | 52% |
53%
Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away:
|
52.7% | |
| 7 | Dandenong City | 21 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 29 | 11.0 | 52% |
51%
Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away:
|
51.7% | |
| 8 | Green Gully | 21 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 29 | 10.5 | 50% |
48%
Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away:
|
49.0% | |
| 9 | St. Albans | 21 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 23 | 8.5 | 40% |
51%
Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away:
|
45.7% | |
| 10 | South Melbourne | 21 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 23 | 8.5 | 40% |
50%
Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away:
|
45.2% | |
| 11 | Altona Magic | 21 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 21 | 8.0 | 38% |
53%
Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away:
|
45.5% | |
| 12 | M. Victory B | 21 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 15 | 5.5 | 26% |
49%
Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away:
|
37.6% | |
| 13 | Port Melbourne | 21 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 15 | 5.5 | 26% |
50%
Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away:
|
38.1% | |
| 14 | Melbourne K. | 21 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 14 | 5.0 | 24% |
52%
Away pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home pPPG of previous opponents played away:
|
37.9% | |
| pPts: Performance Points (Win = 1 point | Draw = 0.5 point | Defeat = 0 point) | |||||||||||
| pPPG: Performance Points Per Game (Performance Points relative to total matches played by the team) | |||||||||||
| Opponents pPPG are calculated based on: - Home pPPG of opponents faced away - Away pPPG of opponents faced at home |
|||||||||||
More information about the details of each opponent pPPG value is visible by hovering the mouse cursor over any of the 'Opponents pPPG' values.
What is the difference between the Points Performance Index and the Performance Rating?
The Points Performance Index (PPI) is based on Points Per Game. Its goal is to mesure the team's capacity to pick up points in the league table. This is a points-centric indicator.
The Performance Rating is based on what we call Performance Points (pPts). Unlike typical Points, where a draw is rewarded at one third of a win, Performance Points are calculated so as to value a draw as half a win.
The typical 3-1-0 point system provides a clear incentive for teams to aim for the win. In the past, the old 2-1-0 system could cause some teams to aim too often for a draw, which could cause some games to become less interesting to watch, especially from a neutral spectator's perspective.
However calculating 'Performance Points' on the base of 1 point for a win, 0.5 point for a draw and 0 point for a defeat allows to take a different look at team performance, as illustrated in the following example:
Let's assume Team A and Team B have each played 10 games.
Team A has the following record: 5 Wins, 0 Draw, 5 Defeats (Total: 15 points | 5 performance points)
Team B has the following record: 2 Wins, 8 Draws, 0 Defeat (Total: 14 points | 6 performance points)
So Team A has been more effective at picking up points than Team B therefore if both teams were to repeat those exact result patterns until the end of the season, Team A will logically finish the season above Team B in the league table.
Now when it comes to analysing performance, one could argue that a team like Team B, that has remained undefeated, winning twice, should not necessarily be considered as having demonstrated a weaker performance than a team that lost half of their matches, as Team A did.
With the classic points system, Team A has a PPG (Points Per Game) of 1.5 and Team B has a lower PPG: 1.4.
With the Performance Points system, Team A has a pPPG (Performance Points Per Game) of 50% and Team B has a higher pPPG: 60%.
How is the Performance Rating calculated?
The Performance Rating (PR) is calculated based on the team's Performance Points Per Game (pPPG) and the pPPG of the opponents already played by the team. It is the average of those two values.
Using the same logic as with the Points Performance Index, the Opponents pPPG value is calculated by taking into account the Away pPPG of opponents played at home and the Home pPPG of opponents played away.
Run-in analysis
| GP | Pts | PPG |
Opponents played PPG |
Opponents remaining PPG |
Played vs Remaining |
|||||||
| 1 | Heidelberg Utd | 21 | 51 | 2.43 |
1.25
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.62
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
-30% | |||||
| 2 | Avondale | 21 | 48 | 2.29 |
1.30
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.48
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
-14% | |||||
| 3 | Dandenong T. | 21 | 41 | 1.95 |
1.43
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.06
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
+26% | |||||
| 4 | Oakleigh C. | 21 | 39 | 1.86 |
1.38
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.33
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
+4% | |||||
| 5 | Preston Lions | 21 | 32 | 1.52 |
1.44
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.18
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
+18% | |||||
| 6 | Hume City | 21 | 31 | 1.48 |
1.47
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.09
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
+26% | |||||
| 7 | Dandenong City | 21 | 29 | 1.38 |
1.44
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.24
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
+14% | |||||
| 8 | Green Gully | 21 | 29 | 1.38 |
1.34
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.67
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
-25% | |||||
| 9 | St. Albans | 21 | 23 | 1.10 |
1.45
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.34
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
+8% | |||||
| 10 | South Melbourne | 21 | 23 | 1.10 |
1.38
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.61
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
-17% | |||||
| 11 | Altona Magic | 21 | 21 | 1.00 |
1.46
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.31
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
+10% | |||||
| 12 | M. Victory B | 21 | 15 | 0.71 |
1.38
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.74
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
-26% | |||||
| 13 | Port Melbourne | 21 | 15 | 0.71 |
1.40
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.70
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
-21% | |||||
| 14 | Melbourne K. | 21 | 14 | 0.67 |
1.45
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.49
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
-3% | |||||
| Opponents PPG are calculated based on: - Home Points Per Game of opponents faced away - Away Points Per Game of opponents faced at home |
||||||||||||
More information about the details of each opponent PPG value is visible by hovering the mouse cursor over any of the 'Opponents played PPG' or 'Opponents remaining PPG' values.
Note: for each team, the opponents' PPG values above are calculated based on the current PPG (Points Per Game) of each of the team's opponents in the league's regular season, taking into account whether the opponent:
- has been played at home or away (played opponents' PPG)
- or will be played at home or away (remaining opponents' PPG).
For example, if a team has the following 4 matches left to play in the regular season:
Match #1 to be played at home against Opponent A
Match #2 to be played away against Opponent B
Match #3 to be played at home against Opponent C
Match #4 to be played away against Opponent D
The value calculated for the remaining opponents' PPG in that example will be the average of the away PPG of Opponent A, the home PPG of Opponent B, the away PPG of Opponent C, and the home PPG of Opponent D.
The objective is to evaluate PPG of previous and remaining opponents based on whether such opponents were faced (or will be faced) at home or away, as there may be a significant difference between a given opponent's results achieved in their home matches and those achieved in away matches.
Please note that these calculations are based on the data that we currently have access to. For some leagues, not all remaining matches are known at any given time. Match dates and schedules may change during the season.
The table is described in more details in the Run-in analysis blog article.
Projected Points
| Team PPG Played | Points |
Opponents PPG Played | Remaining |
Projected PPG (pPPG) PPG x Ratio |
Projected Points (pPts) pPPG x Games Remaining |
Sum | ||||||||
| GP | Pts | PPG | PLA | REM | Ratio | pPPG | GR | pPts | Pts + pPts | |||
| 1 | Heidelberg Utd | 21 | 51 | 2.43 |
1.25
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.62
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
0.77 | 1.88 | 5 | 9.38 | 60.38 | |
| 2 | Avondale | 21 | 48 | 2.29 |
1.30
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.48
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
0.88 | 2.01 | 5 | 10.06 | 58.06 | |
| 3 | Dandenong T. | 21 | 41 | 1.95 |
1.43
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.06
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
1.35 | 2.63 | 5 | 13.15 | 54.15 | |
| 4 | Oakleigh C. | 21 | 39 | 1.86 |
1.38
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.33
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
1.04 | 1.93 | 5 | 9.65 | 48.65 | |
| 5 | Preston Lions | 21 | 32 | 1.52 |
1.44
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.18
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
1.22 | 1.85 | 5 | 9.27 | 41.27 | |
| 6 | Hume City | 21 | 31 | 1.48 |
1.47
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.09
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
1.35 | 2.00 | 5 | 9.98 | 40.98 | |
| 7 | Dandenong City | 21 | 29 | 1.38 |
1.44
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.24
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
1.16 | 1.60 | 5 | 8.01 | 37.01 | |
| 8 | Green Gully | 21 | 29 | 1.38 |
1.34
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.67
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
0.80 | 1.11 | 5 | 5.54 | 34.54 | |
| 9 | St. Albans | 21 | 23 | 1.10 |
1.45
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.34
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
1.08 | 1.19 | 5 | 5.95 | 28.95 | |
| 10 | South Melbourne | 21 | 23 | 1.10 |
1.38
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.61
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
0.86 | 0.94 | 5 | 4.71 | 27.71 | |
| 11 | Altona Magic | 21 | 21 | 1.00 |
1.46
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.31
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
1.11 | 1.11 | 5 | 5.57 | 26.57 | |
| 12 | M. Victory B | 21 | 15 | 0.71 |
1.38
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.74
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
0.79 | 0.56 | 5 | 2.82 | 17.82 | |
| 13 | Port Melbourne | 21 | 15 | 0.71 |
1.40
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.70
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
0.82 | 0.58 | 5 | 2.92 | 17.92 | |
| 14 | Melbourne K. | 21 | 14 | 0.67 |
1.45
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of previous opponents played at home, and home PPG of previous opponents played away:
|
1.49
Away PPG (Points Per Game) of remaining opponents to be played at home, and home PPG of remaining opponents to be played away:
|
0.97 | 0.65 | 5 | 3.26 | 17.26 | |
| Opponents PPG are calculated based on: - Home Points Per Game of opponents faced away - Away Points Per Game of opponents faced at home |
||||||||||||
More information about the details of each opponent PPG value is visible by hovering the mouse cursor over any of the 'PLA' column (Opponents played PPG) or the 'REM' column (Opponents remaining PPG) values.
This table shows the current Points Per Game for each team, the Points Per Game of the opponents they have already played against, and the Points Per Game (PPG) of the opponents they have yet to play against.
A Ratio below 1 indicates that the team has played a combined opposition that has a PPG that is lower than the combined PPG of the future oppositions.
A Ratio above 1 indicates that the team has played a combined opposition that has a PPG that is higher than the combined PPG of the future oppositions.
We calculate the Projected PPG for the team by multiplying the team's existing PPG with that Ratio value.
We then multiply that Projected PPG (pPPG) value with the number of remaining games that the team still has to play, and the result is called the Projected Points (pPts)
The value in the last column is the combined points value, calculated by adding the number of existing points to the number of Projected Points.
For this table:
GP: Games Played
Pts: Points
PPG: Points Per Game (Team PPG)
PLA: PPG of opponents played
REM: PPG of opponents remaining
Ratio: PPG of opponents played / PPG of opponents remaining
pPPG: Projected PPG (Team PPG x Ratio), up to a limit of 3
GR: Games Remaining (number of matches remaining to be played by the team)
pPts: Projected Points (GR x pPPG)
Combined: Pts + pPts
The formula can be summarized as:
Projected Points = Team current PPG x (played opponents PPG / remaining opponents PPG) x number of remaining matches
Or if we use the column headers of the above table, the formula would translate to:
Projected Points = PPG x (PLA / REM) x GR
Note: Projected points are projections, not predictions. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Note #2: Please note that these calculations are based on the data that we currently have access to. The number of projected points is partly based on the number of remaining matches listed in the GR (Games Remaining) column. For some leagues, not all remaining matches are known at any given time.
You may also want to take a look at the Run-in analysis table, which is also based on metrics calculated in this Projected Points table.
Statistics
Pre-match stats based on: Home results of home team / Away results of away team
| Home / Away | % Points per game | W D L | GF | GA | TG | 2.5+ | Last 4 | ||||||
|
Fr 18 Jul 10:30 |
home | Green Gully |
|
60% | 2.00 | 1.40 | 3.40 | 60% |
|
||||
| away | Heidelberg Utd |
|
80% | 2.00 | 0.80 | 2.80 | 60% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 18 Jul 11:15 |
home | Oakleigh C. |
|
60% | 2.50 | 1.40 | 3.90 | 100% |
|
||||
| away | Hume City |
|
40% | 1.50 | 1.80 | 3.30 | 60% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 18 Jul 11:15 |
home | Port Melbourne |
|
27% | 1.00 | 1.90 | 2.90 | 50% |
|
||||
| away | Dandenong T. |
|
53% | 1.50 | 1.50 | 3.00 | 60% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 18 Jul 11:30 |
home | Preston Lions |
|
67% | 1.90 | 1.00 | 2.90 | 50% |
|
||||
| away | Melbourne K. |
|
13% | 1.00 | 2.90 | 3.90 | 100% |
|
|||||
|
Sa 19 Jul 06:00 |
home | Avondale |
|
87% | 3.20 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 80% |
|
||||
| away | Dandenong City |
|
53% | 1.80 | 1.30 | 3.10 | 70% |
|
|||||
|
Su 20 Jul 06:00 |
home | St. Albans |
|
37% | 1.78 | 2.00 | 3.78 | 89% |
|
||||
| away | M. Victory B |
|
33% | 1.67 | 2.22 | 3.89 | 78% |
|
|||||
|
Su 20 Jul 08:00 |
home | South Melbourne |
|
40% | 1.30 | 1.90 | 3.20 | 80% |
|
||||
| away | Altona Magic |
|
27% | 1.00 | 2.40 | 3.40 | 60% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 25 Jul 10:30 |
home | Green Gully |
|
60% | 2.00 | 1.40 | 3.40 | 60% |
|
||||
| away | St. Albans |
|
36% | 1.92 | 1.92 | 3.83 | 92% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 25 Jul 10:30 |
home | Heidelberg Utd |
|
82% | 2.45 | 1.00 | 3.45 | 73% |
|
||||
| away | South Melbourne |
|
33% | 1.09 | 1.55 | 2.64 | 36% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 25 Jul 10:45 |
home | Dandenong City |
|
39% | 1.82 | 2.00 | 3.82 | 82% |
|
||||
| away | Oakleigh C. |
|
64% | 2.18 | 1.55 | 3.73 | 82% |
|
|||||
| Calculations based on home results of the home team and away results of the visiting team recorded during the current season in the league. | |||||||||||||
% Points per game: percentage of points picked up by the team relative to maximum possible points
Pre-match stats based on: all results for each team
| Overall | % Points per game | W D L | GF | GA | TG | 2.5+ | Last 4 | ||||||
|
Fr 18 Jul 10:30 |
all | Green Gully |
|
46% | 1.67 | 1.57 | 3.24 | 67% |
|
||||
| all | Heidelberg Utd |
|
81% | 2.24 | 0.90 | 3.14 | 67% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 18 Jul 11:15 |
all | Oakleigh C. |
|
62% | 2.33 | 1.48 | 3.81 | 90% |
|
||||
| all | Hume City |
|
49% | 1.52 | 1.52 | 3.05 | 62% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 18 Jul 11:15 |
all | Port Melbourne |
|
24% | 0.95 | 2.43 | 3.38 | 67% |
|
||||
| all | Dandenong T. |
|
65% | 2.14 | 1.33 | 3.48 | 71% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 18 Jul 11:30 |
all | Preston Lions |
|
51% | 1.43 | 1.33 | 2.76 | 52% |
|
||||
| all | Melbourne K. |
|
22% | 1.19 | 2.48 | 3.67 | 86% |
|
|||||
|
Sa 19 Jul 06:00 |
all | Avondale |
|
76% | 2.62 | 1.14 | 3.76 | 81% |
|
||||
| all | Dandenong City |
|
46% | 1.81 | 1.67 | 3.48 | 76% |
|
|||||
|
Su 20 Jul 06:00 |
all | St. Albans |
|
37% | 1.86 | 1.95 | 3.81 | 90% |
|
||||
| all | M. Victory B |
|
24% | 1.52 | 2.29 | 3.81 | 81% |
|
|||||
|
Su 20 Jul 08:00 |
all | South Melbourne |
|
37% | 1.19 | 1.71 | 2.90 | 57% |
|
||||
| all | Altona Magic |
|
33% | 0.90 | 1.57 | 2.48 | 43% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 25 Jul 10:30 |
all | Green Gully |
|
46% | 1.67 | 1.57 | 3.24 | 67% |
|
||||
| all | St. Albans |
|
37% | 1.86 | 1.95 | 3.81 | 90% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 25 Jul 10:30 |
all | Heidelberg Utd |
|
81% | 2.24 | 0.90 | 3.14 | 67% |
|
||||
| all | South Melbourne |
|
37% | 1.19 | 1.71 | 2.90 | 57% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 25 Jul 10:45 |
all | Dandenong City |
|
46% | 1.81 | 1.67 | 3.48 | 76% |
|
||||
| all | Oakleigh C. |
|
62% | 2.33 | 1.48 | 3.81 | 90% |
|
|||||
| Calculations based on all league results recorded in the current season. | |||||||||||||
% Points per game: percentage of points picked up by the team relative to maximum possible points
Pre-match stats based on: last 8 results for each team
| Last 8 matches | % Points per game | W D L | GF | GA | TG | 2.5+ | Last 4 | ||||||
|
Fr 18 Jul 10:30 |
last 8 | Green Gully |
|
46% | 2.00 | 1.50 | 3.50 | 75% |
|
||||
| last 8 | Heidelberg Utd |
|
83% | 1.88 | 0.63 | 2.50 | 50% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 18 Jul 11:15 |
last 8 | Oakleigh C. |
|
46% | 2.63 | 2.38 | 5.00 | 100% |
|
||||
| last 8 | Hume City |
|
33% | 1.25 | 1.25 | 2.50 | 50% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 18 Jul 11:15 |
last 8 | Port Melbourne |
|
33% | 0.88 | 1.88 | 2.75 | 50% |
|
||||
| last 8 | Dandenong T. |
|
50% | 1.88 | 1.38 | 3.25 | 50% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 18 Jul 11:30 |
last 8 | Preston Lions |
|
46% | 1.38 | 1.13 | 2.50 | 38% |
|
||||
| last 8 | Melbourne K. |
|
21% | 1.50 | 2.88 | 4.38 | 88% |
|
|||||
|
Sa 19 Jul 06:00 |
last 8 | Avondale |
|
75% | 2.25 | 1.00 | 3.25 | 62% |
|
||||
| last 8 | Dandenong City |
|
42% | 1.50 | 1.63 | 3.13 | 75% |
|
|||||
|
Su 20 Jul 06:00 |
last 8 | St. Albans |
|
50% | 2.00 | 1.75 | 3.75 | 75% |
|
||||
| last 8 | M. Victory B |
|
12% | 1.50 | 2.63 | 4.13 | 88% |
|
|||||
|
Su 20 Jul 08:00 |
last 8 | South Melbourne |
|
58% | 1.88 | 1.50 | 3.38 | 62% |
|
||||
| last 8 | Altona Magic |
|
42% | 0.88 | 1.88 | 2.75 | 38% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 25 Jul 10:30 |
last 8 | Green Gully |
|
46% | 2.00 | 1.50 | 3.50 | 75% |
|
||||
| last 8 | St. Albans |
|
50% | 2.00 | 1.75 | 3.75 | 75% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 25 Jul 10:30 |
last 8 | Heidelberg Utd |
|
83% | 1.88 | 0.63 | 2.50 | 50% |
|
||||
| last 8 | South Melbourne |
|
58% | 1.88 | 1.50 | 3.38 | 62% |
|
|||||
|
Fr 25 Jul 10:45 |
last 8 | Dandenong City |
|
42% | 1.50 | 1.63 | 3.13 | 75% |
|
||||
| last 8 | Oakleigh C. |
|
46% | 2.63 | 2.38 | 5.00 | 100% |
|
|||||
| Calculations based on the last 8 league results of each team recorded in the current season. | |||||||||||||
% Points per game: percentage of points picked up by the team relative to maximum possible points
Tables overview
| ||||||||||||
|
More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 147 matches played in the Australian NPL Victoria league, a total of 491 goals have been scored (3.34 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including the league results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded. |
| The number of matches included in the regular season may differ depending on the way each league is structured. For most national leagues, the stats above relate to the selected league competition in the regular season, excluding playoff matches. Some leagues include additional rounds of matches, for which dedicated group tables may be featured on this page. When such group tables are displayed on the main league page, the stats above also include the matches related to those tables. |