| Home | Away | Total | |
| Played | 12 | 12 | 24 |
| Points Per Game | 1.83 | 1.08 | 1.46 |
| Select Favourite Stats | |||
| View Favourite Stats for all teams | |||
 |
Hume City |
(this season in the league) |
Hume City's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 7 Feb | Preston Lions |
2 - 1
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Lleyton Brooks (54) 2-0 Jason Romero (64) 2-1 N/A (90) |
Hume City | + | - | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 14 Feb | Hume City |
2 - 1
0-1 Hassan Jalloh (40) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Lloyd Isgrove (82) 2-1 Lloyd Isgrove (90) pen. |
Dandenong T. | + | - | - | 0-1 | stats |
| 21 Feb | Green Gully |
1 - 1
0-1 Harry Ascroft (12) 1-1 Amar Abdallah (41) pen. |
Hume City | - | - | - | 1-1 | stats |
| 28 Feb | Dandenong City |
1 - 3
1-0 George Lambadaridis (39) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Birkan Kirdar (68) 1-2 N/A (70) 1-3 N/A (89) |
Hume City | + | - | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 7 Mar | Hume City |
2 - 0
1-0 N/A (35) --------------------------------------- 2-0 Birkan Kirdar (57) pen. |
Altona Magic | - | + | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 14 Mar | Heidelberg Utd |
5 - 1
0-1 Joshua Okane (8) 1-1 Bul Jauch (26) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Bul Jauch (46) 3-1 Asahi Yokokawa (63) 4-1 Asahi Yokokawa (83) 5-1 Asahi Yokokawa (90) |
Hume City | + | - | - | 1-1 | stats |
| 21 Mar | Hume City |
1 - 1
0-1 Andy Brennan (22) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Lloyd Isgrove (62) |
South Melbourne | - | - | - | 0-1 | stats |
| 29 Mar | Avondale |
2 - 0
1-0 Manyluak Aguek (11) pen. --------------------------------------- 2-0 Stephen Zinni (56) |
Hume City | - | - | + | 1-0 | stats |
| 4 Apr | Hume City |
0 - 3
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Mac Hilson (o.g.) (52) 0-2 Alex Salmon (61) 0-3 N/A (67) |
Oakleigh C. | + | - | + | 0-0 | stats |
| 11 Apr | Port Melbourne |
1 - 3
0-1 Rob Harker (12) 0-2 N/A (24) 1-2 N/A (43) --------------------------------------- 1-3 N/A (87) |
Hume City | + | - | - | 1-2 | stats |
| 25 Apr | Hume City |
2 - 1
1-0 Josh Bingham (38) --------------------------------------- 2-0 Mark Ochieng (56) 2-1 Ciaran Bramwell (80) |
Melbourne K. | + | - | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 5 May | M. Victory B |
2 - 3
1-0 N/A (7) 1-1 Harry Ascroft (11) 1-2 Mehmet Uysal (37) --------------------------------------- 1-3 N/A (50) 2-3 Luka Kolic (68) |
Hume City | + | - | - | 1-2 | stats |
| 10 May | Hume City |
3 - 2
1-0 Godfrey Debele (8) 1-1 Josh Gulevski (21) pen. --------------------------------------- 1-2 N/A (54) 2-2 Birkan Kirdar (60) pen. 3-2 Lloyd Isgrove (82) pen. |
St. Albans | + | - | - | 1-1 | stats |
| 16 May | Hume City |
0 - 1
0-1 Jason Romero (20) |
Preston Lions | - | - | + | 0-1 | stats |
| 24 May | Dandenong T. |
1 - 1
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Daniel Clark (64) 1-1 Rob Harker (90) |
Hume City | - | - | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 30 May | Hume City |
3 - 2
1-0 Harry Ascroft (17) 1-1 Adisu Bayew (37) 2-1 Rob Harker (40) 2-2 Elioan Kifle (45) --------------------------------------- 3-2 Rob Harker (55) |
Green Gully | + | - | - | 2-2 | stats |
| 6 Jun | Hume City |
3 - 0
1-0 Lloyd Isgrove (45) --------------------------------------- 2-0 Rob Harker (73) 3-0 Mehmet Uysal (90) |
Dandenong City | + | + | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 14 Jun | Altona Magic |
1 - 1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Joshua Okane (53) 1-1 Alexander Gustafsson (72) |
Hume City | - | - | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 20 Jun | Hume City |
0 - 1
0-1 Bul Jauch (1) |
Heidelberg Utd | - | - | + | 0-1 | stats |
| 27 Jun | South Melbourne |
2 - 1
1-0 N/A (38) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Birkan Kirdar (82) 2-1 Nahuel Bonada (84) |
Hume City | + | - | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 4 Jul | Hume City |
1 - 2
0-1 Aisen Ishak (o.g.) (20) 0-2 Stephen Zinni (35) 1-2 Mason Tatafu (38) |
Avondale | + | - | - | 1-2 | stats |
| 18 Jul | Oakleigh C. |
4 - 0
1-0 Connor Hampson (10) 2-0 Adem Duratovic (25) --------------------------------------- 3-0 A. Deu (61) 4-0 N/A (74) |
Hume City | + | - | + | 2-0 | stats |
| 25 Jul | Hume City |
4 - 1
0-1 George Mells (23) 1-1 Rob Harker (30) 2-1 Lloyd Isgrove (45) --------------------------------------- 3-1 Godfrey Debele (57) 4-1 Rob Harker (67) |
Port Melbourne | + | - | - | 2-1 | stats |
| 1 Aug | Melbourne K. |
1 - 1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Lloyd Isgrove (80) 1-1 N/A (83) |
Hume City | - | - | - | 0-0 | stats |
| Filter Hume City results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 15 Aug | Hume City | - | M. Victory B | 1.83 | 0.82 | |
| 23 Aug | St. Albans | - | Hume City | 1.30 | 1.08 | |
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.06 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
Run-in overview | ||||||
|
Of their 2 remaining matches in the Australian NPL Victoria league, Hume City will be playing as many matches at home and away (1 in each case).
Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, Hume City's remaining away matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining home matches.
Hume City's opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 0.82 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that Hume City will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 1.30 Points Per Game at home in the league. | ||||||
| View opponents PPG values for all teams | ||||||
| Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
Hume City (24 matches) vs league average
Hume City at home (12 matches) vs league average at home
Hume City away (12 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hume City goals statistics indicate an average of 1.54 goals scored per game so far this season, which is lower than the average number of 1.63 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in the league. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Hume City | |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 10 / 24 | 42% | |
| Opponent scored first | 14 / 24 | 58% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 6 / 24 | 25% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 9 / 24 | 38% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 20.8 min. | 23% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 39.7 min. | 44% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 29.6 min. | 33% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Hume City have been in the lead for an average duration of 20.8 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 29.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Hume City | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 24 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 17 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 7 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 59% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 17 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 8 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 47% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 12 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 14 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
Hume City have taken the lead 17 times and have conceded an equalizer on 7 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 59% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 41%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 17 times that Hume City's opponents have taken the lead, Hume City have managed to score an equalizer on 8 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 47%.
|
Hume City | |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 5 / 12 | 42% | |
| Opponent scored first | 7 / 12 | 58% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 4 / 12 | 33% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 5 / 12 | 42% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 23.2 min. | 26% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 36.7 min. | 41% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 30.2 min. | 34% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Hume City have been in the lead for an average duration of 23.2 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 30.2 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Hume City | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 12 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 10 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 3 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 70% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 8 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 4 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 7 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 4 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Hume City have taken the lead 10 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 70% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 30%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 8 times that Hume City's opponents have taken the lead when Hume City were playing at home, Hume City have managed to score an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 50%.
|
Hume City | |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 5 / 12 | 42% | |
| Opponent scored first | 7 / 12 | 58% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 2 / 12 | 17% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 4 / 12 | 33% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 18.3 min. | 20% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 42.7 min. | 47% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 29.0 min. | 32% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Hume City have been in the lead for an average duration of 18.3 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 29.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Hume City | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 12 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 7 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 4 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 43% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 9 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 4 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 44% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 5 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 10 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Hume City have taken the lead 7 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 43% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 57%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 9 times that Hume City's opponents have taken the lead when Hume City were playing away, Hume City have managed to score an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 44%.
Results table
Hume City stats rank the team in 6th position in the the league table with 35 points, 3 points behind Preston Lions and 1 point above Dandenong City. The above table shows Hume City results against each league opponent. The tables below provide additional statistics regarding Hume City's season in the Australian NPL Victoria league. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 21 | 16 | 37 |
| GF per match | 1.75 | 1.33 | 1.54 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 15 | 23 | 38 |
| GA per match | 1.25 | 1.92 | 1.58 |
| GF + GA per match | 3.00 | 3.25 | 3.13 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 83% | 100% | 92% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 67% | 58% | 62% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 25% | 42% | 33% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 25% | 17% | 21% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 8% | 4% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 92% | 67% | 79% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 33% | 42% | 38% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 25% | 17% | 21% |
| Hume City over 2.5 stats indicate a 62% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is lower than the league average value of 68% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in the league. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 17% | 0% | 8% |
| Won-to-nil | 17% | 0% | 8% |
| Failed to score | 25% | 17% | 21% |
| Lost-to-nil | 25% | 17% | 21% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 75% | 83% | 79% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 58% | 33% | 46% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Scored in both halves | 50% | 17% | 33% |
| Both teams scored | 58% | 83% | 71% |
| Conceding Rate | 83% | 100% | 92% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| Conceded in both halves | 8% | 42% | 25% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 75% | 83% | 79% |
| GF over 1.5 | 58% | 25% | 42% |
| GF over 2.5 | 33% | 25% | 29% |
| GF over 3.5 | 8% | 0% | 4% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 83% | 100% | 92% |
| GA over 1.5 | 33% | 50% | 42% |
| GA over 2.5 | 8% | 17% | 12% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 17% | 8% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 8% | 4% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Hume City matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 17% | 0% | 8% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 17% | 42% | 29% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 42% | 17% | 29% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 0% | 25% | 12% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 25% | 17% | 21% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 17% | 0% | 8% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 58% | 58% | 58% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 25% | 42% | 33% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Away wins | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Home & Away defeats | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
|
Hume City have obtained as many one-goal margin wins as wins with a margin of 2 goals or more (5 wins for each).
A majority of Hume City's defeats had a one-goal margin (5 defeats), while 4 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more. |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 63% | 37% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | ||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.83 | |||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.08 | |||
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | +0.75 | |||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 57% | 43% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 39% | 61% | ||
| League average | 56% | 44% | ||
|
Matches played at home have accounted for 63% of Hume City's total points and 57% of the goals they have scored so far this season in the league. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 4 | 2 | 6 | 25% |
| Drawing at HT | 3 | 6 | 9 | 38% |
| Losing at HT | 5 | 4 | 9 | 38% |
| Total | 12 | 12 | 24 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
Hume City |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 10 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 15 | 41% | |
| GA | 19 | 50% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 22 | 59% | |
| GA | 19 | 50% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 54 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 47 |
|
Hume City |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 9 | 43% | |
| GA | 10 | 67% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 12 | 57% | |
| GA | 5 | 33% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 54 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 39 |
|
Hume City |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 6 | 38% | |
| GA | 9 | 39% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 10 | 62% | |
| GA | 14 | 61% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 54 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 52 |
Hume City scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Hume City score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-1 so far (4 times).
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| This season in the league |
| Hume City failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 7 matches. Hume City conceded at least one goal in 10 of their 12 home matches. Hume City conceded at least one goal in each of their 12 away matches. Hume City have scored in 10 of their 12 away matches. Hume City failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 12 away matches. |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsTotal match goals stats
Total match goals stats (last 8 matches)
Total match goals stats (at home)
Total match goals stats (away)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
