SoccerSTATS.com back to top
LEAGUES MATCHES STATS FAV BLOG

 Favourite leagues
 -----------------------------------
 My Favourites
 ----------------------------------- Select favourites
 Featured leagues
 ----------------------------------- ENG - Premier League ITA - Serie A SPA - La Liga FRA - Ligue 1 GER - Bundesliga
 All leagues
 ----------------------------------- See 'Search league' box Display all leagues
 International (clubs)
 ----------------------------------- Champions League Europa League Conference League Copa Libertadores Copa Sudamericana AFC Champions League FIFA Club World Cup Champions League (W)
 International (nations)
 ----------------------------------- EURO 2024 Euro Qualification UEFA Nations League World Cup 2022 WC Qualification Europe WC Qual. South-America WC Qualification Asia Copa America Africa Cup of Nations Asian Cup Women's World Cup Women's EURO 2025
LOGIN
usa2
USA - USL Championship
2025 2024
Favourite Stats  Tables Home / Away tables Form tables Tables by Date Half-time stats Wide table Points performance Performance rating Run-in analysis Relative form Projected points Home advantage Points Won/Lost  Matches Matches by date Results grid Results filter Current streaks  Goals per match Over / Under Total Goals Goal ranges Average goals Scored / conceded Both teams scored Goal margins  Goal timing Goals per 10 min. Goals per 15 min. First Goal stats Scored in both halves  Leading / losing Lead durations Scored / conceded first Leading / Trailing at HT Goal types Equalisers scored Equalisers conceded
MLSUSL ChampionshipUSL League OneNSWLUSL Super League
Birmingham L. Charleston Colorado S. Detroit City El Paso FC Tulsa Hartford A. Indy Eleven Las Vegas L. Lexington Loudoun Utd Louisville City Miami FC Monterey Bay New Mexico North Carolina Oakland Roots Orange County Phoenix Rising Pittsburgh Rhode Island Sacramento R. San Antonio Tampa Bay
LATEST MATCHES FORM TABLES HEAD-TO-HEAD GOALS HALF-TIME TIMING FIRST GOAL FAVOURITE STATS
🔍

Sacramento R. vs FC Tulsa

advertisement


Visual table

  GP Pts
1  Charleston 18 41
2  Louisville City 17 38
3  FC Tulsa 16 29
4  Loudoun Utd 17 27
5  San Antonio 16 27
6  North Carolina 16 26
7  New Mexico 16 25
8  Sacramento R. 16 24
9  Orange County 16 23
10  Pittsburgh 17 23
11  El Paso 16 23
12  Phoenix Rising 17 23
13  Monterey Bay 18 22
14  Detroit City 17 21
15  Indy Eleven 16 20
16  Oakland Roots 17 20
17  Lexington 17 19
18  Miami FC 17 19
19  Colorado S. 16 18
20  Birmingham L. 18 18
21  Las Vegas L. 17 18
22  Rhode Island 17 17
23  Hartford A. 16 16
24  Tampa Bay 16 14

 
Sun 8 Jun 2025
Sacramento R.0 1FC Tulsa
0:1 Kalil ElMedkhar (10)






Seasonal streaks


8th consecutive game where FC Tulsa scored.
6th consecutive away game where FC Tulsa scored.
 

 
Lead durations in 90 minutes of regular time
090
Sacramento R.Level (10)FC Tulsa (80)
Lead durations tables
  How are the duration values calculated?⌄

To calculate the above duration values based on a total of 90 minutes, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are considered scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are considered scored on the 90th minute.


Outcome Surprise-Level

Points Per Game (before the match)
Sacramento R.
at home		FC Tulsa
away		Total
1.802.003.80


OutcomeOutcome surprise-level
(any scoreline)(Losing team PPG / Total) * 100
Away win
47.4
Scale: from 0 (less surprising) to 100 (more surprising)

Outcome Surprise-levels

More information on the calculation of the Outcome surprise-level is outlined in the following blog article:
Evaluating surprising results







 






 flag

Sacramento Republic

 (this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 9 3 5 1  
  Away 7 3 1 3  
  Total 16 6 6 4  
PPG (Home): 1.56
PPG (Away): 1.43
PPG (Total): 1.50

Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game1.50 1.75 +16.7%
AVG Goals For1.38 1.50 +8.7%
AVG Goals Against0.75 0.25 -66.7%



Sacramento R.'s progression (home & away)
Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
9 Mar Sacramento R. 2 - 1

     0-1   Greg Hurst (21)
1-1   Russell Cicerone (45) pen.
---------------------------------------
2-1   Lewis Jamieson (47)
New Mexico + - - 1-1 stats
23 Mar Sacramento R. 2 - 2

1-0   Jack Gurr (24)
---------------------------------------
2-0   Russell Cicerone (74)
     2-1   Justin Dhillon (86) pen.
     2-2   Justin Dhillon (90) pen.
Colorado S. + - - 1-0 stats
29 Mar FC Tulsa 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Taylor Calheira (87)
Sacramento R. - - + 0-0 stats
6 Apr Sacramento R. 1 - 1

---------------------------------------
1-0   C. Rasguido (69)
     1-1   Amadou Dia (90)
Louisville City - - - 0-0 stats
13 Apr Orange County 2 - 1

1-0   Danny Vitiello (o.g.) (18)
---------------------------------------
2-0   Blake Willey (o.g.) (48)
     2-1   J. Herrera (56)
Sacramento R. + - - 1-0 stats
19 Apr Phoenix Rising 2 - 2

     0-1   J. Herrera (18)
     0-2   Dominik Wanner (34)
1-2   Jearl Margaritha (37)
---------------------------------------
2-2   Damián Rivera (78)
Sacramento R. + - - 1-2 stats
4 May Oakland Roots 0 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Russell Cicerone (48) pen.
Sacramento R. - + - 0-0 stats
11 May Sacramento R. 1 - 1

     0-1   Elvis Amoh (36)
---------------------------------------
1-1   T. Amann (90) pen.
Indy Eleven - - - 0-1 stats
18 May Sacramento R. 5 - 0

1-0   J. Herrera (30)
2-0   Jack Gurr (36)
3-0   Lewis Jamieson (44)
---------------------------------------
4-0   Nick Ross (66) pen.
5-0   T. Amann (86)
Las Vegas L. + + - 3-0 stats
8 Jun Sacramento R. 0 - 1

     0-1   Kalil ElMedkhar (10)
FC Tulsa - - + 0-1 stats
15 Jun Sacramento R. 0 - 0

San Antonio - + + 0-0 stats
19 Jun Birmingham L. 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Sebastian Tregarthen (90)
Sacramento R. - - + 0-0 stats
21 Jun Rhode Island 0 - 2

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Rodrigo López (55)
     0-2   C. Rasguido (63)
Sacramento R. - + - 0-0 stats
5 Jul Las Vegas L. 0 - 2

---------------------------------------
     0-1   A. Edwards (50)
     0-2   Russell Cicerone (67)
Sacramento R. - + - 0-0 stats
13 Jul Sacramento R. 3 - 0

1-0   J. Herrera (44)
---------------------------------------
2-0   Michelle Benítez (75)
3-0   C. Rasguido (90)
El Paso + + - 1-0 stats
20 Jul Sacramento R. 0 - 0

Lexington - + + 0-0 stats



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
3 Aug San Antonio h2h Sacramento R. 1.78 1.43
10 Aug Sacramento R. h2h Monterey Bay 1.56 0.60
17 Aug Sacramento R. h2h Oakland Roots 1.56 1.50
24 Aug El Paso h2h Sacramento R. 1.57 1.43
31 Aug New Mexico h2h Sacramento R. 1.86 1.43
6 Sep Tampa Bay h2h Sacramento R. 1.00 1.43
14 Sep Sacramento R. h2h Phoenix Rising 1.56 1.50
21 Sep Colorado S. h2h Sacramento R. 1.33 1.43
28 Sep Monterey Bay h2h Sacramento R. 2.00 1.43
2 Oct Sacramento R. h2h Orange County 1.56 0.57
5 Oct Sacramento R. h2h Charleston 1.56 1.89
11 Oct Hartford A. h2h Sacramento R. 1.22 1.43
17 Oct Lexington h2h Sacramento R. 1.44 1.43
26 Oct Sacramento R. h2h Miami FC 1.56 1.14
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.39

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins -2-
Consecutive draws 1-1
Consecutive defeats ---
No win 1-1
No draw -4-
No defeat 324
1 goal scored or more -2-
1 goal conceded or more ---
No goal scored 1-1
No goal conceded 324
GF+GA over 2.5 ---
GF+GA under 2.5 141
Scored at least twice -2-










Comparison with league average


Sacramento R. (16 matches) vs league average

(overall)Sacramento R. League AVG
Points per game  1.50 1.38
% Wins  38% 38%
% Draws  38% 24%
% Defeats  25% 38%
Goals scored per game  1.38 1.30
Goals conceded per game  0.75 1.30
% Clean sheets  44% 27%
% Failed To Score  31% 27%
% Won To Nil  31% 19%
% Lost To Nil  19% 19%
% Team scored first  50% 46%
% Opponent scored first  38% 46%
Average minute scored first  42 33
Average minute conceded first  44 33
Lead-defending rate  67% 61%
Equalizing rate  33% 39%
% Time leading  29% 25%
% Time level in goals  55% 51%
% Time trailing  16% 25%
PPG when scored first  2.25 2.18
PPG when conceded first  0.67 0.64
Total goals per game  2.13 2.61
% over 1.5 goals  62% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  38% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  19% 24%
% both teams scored  38% 54%

Sacramento R. at home (9 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Sacramento R. League AVG
Points per game  1.56 1.57
% Wins  33% 44%
% Draws  56% 24%
% Defeats  11% 32%
Goals scored per game  1.56 1.45
Goals conceded per game  0.67 1.16
% Clean sheets  44% 31%
% Failed To Score  33% 22%
% Won To Nil  22% 24%
% Lost To Nil  11% 15%
% Team scored first  44% 52%
% Opponent scored first  33% 40%
Average minute scored first  42 33
Average minute conceded first  22 32
Lead-defending rate  60% 65%
Equalizing rate  67% 43%
% Time leading  29% 28%
% Time level in goals  51% 51%
% Time trailing  20% 22%
PPG when scored first  2.00 2.29
PPG when conceded first  1.33 0.74
Total goals per game  2.22 2.61
% over 1.5 goals  67% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  44% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  22% 24%
% both teams scored  44% 54%

Sacramento R. away (7 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Sacramento R. League AVG
Points per game  1.43 1.19
% Wins  43% 32%
% Draws  14% 24%
% Defeats  43% 44%
Goals scored per game  1.14 1.16
Goals conceded per game  0.86 1.45
% Clean sheets  43% 22%
% Failed To Score  29% 31%
% Won To Nil  43% 15%
% Lost To Nil  29% 24%
% Team scored first  57% 40%
% Opponent scored first  43% 52%
Average minute scored first  43 32
Average minute conceded first  65 33
Lead-defending rate  75% 57%
Equalizing rate  0% 35%
% Time leading  28% 22%
% Time level in goals  60% 51%
% Time trailing  12% 28%
PPG when scored first  2.50 2.04
PPG when conceded first  0.00 0.56
Total goals per game  2.00 2.61
% over 1.5 goals  57% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  29% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  14% 24%
% both teams scored  29% 54%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Sacramento R.
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 8 / 16 50%
  Opponent scored first 6 / 16 38%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 4 / 16 25%
  Opponent was leading at HT 3 / 16 19%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 25.8 min. 29%
  Average minutes level in goals 49.6 min. 55%
  Average minutes trailing 14.6 min. 16%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Sacramento Republic have been in the lead for an average duration of 25.8 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 14.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Sacramento R.
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 16

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 9
  Equalizer goals conceded 3
  Lead defending rate * (1) 67%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 6
  Equalizer goals scored 2
  Equalizing rate * (2) 33%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 11
  Non-crucial goals conceded 3

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Sacramento Republic have taken the lead 9 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 67% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 33%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 6 times that Sacramento R.'s opponents have taken the lead, Sacramento R. have managed to score an equalizer on 2 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 33%.


 flag Sacramento R.
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 4 / 9 44%
  Opponent scored first 3 / 9 33%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 3 / 9 33%
  Opponent was leading at HT 2 / 9 22%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 26.2 min. 29%
  Average minutes level in goals 46.2 min. 51%
  Average minutes trailing 17.6 min. 20%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Sacramento R. have been in the lead for an average duration of 26.2 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 17.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Sacramento R.
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 9

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 5
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 60%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 3
  Equalizer goals scored 2
  Equalizing rate * (2) 67%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 7
  Non-crucial goals conceded 1

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Sacramento R. have taken the lead 5 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 60% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 40%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 3 times that Sacramento R.'s opponents have taken the lead when Sacramento R. were playing at home, Sacramento R. have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 67%.



 flag Sacramento R.
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 4 / 7 57%
  Opponent scored first 3 / 7 43%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 1 / 7 14%
  Opponent was leading at HT 1 / 7 14%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 25.3 min. 28%
  Average minutes level in goals 54.0 min. 60%
  Average minutes trailing 10.7 min. 12%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Sacramento R. have been in the lead for an average duration of 25.3 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 10.7 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Sacramento R.
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 7

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 4
  Equalizer goals conceded 1
  Lead defending rate * (1) 75%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 3
  Equalizer goals scored 0
  Equalizing rate * (2) 0%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 4
  Non-crucial goals conceded 2

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Sacramento R. have taken the lead 4 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 75% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 25%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 3 times that Sacramento R.'s opponents have taken the lead when Sacramento R. were playing away, Sacramento R. have managed to score an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 0%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Charleston 18 41 5 Oct   h2h
2 Louisville City 17 38 1 - 1   h2h
3 FC Tulsa 16 29 0 - 1 1 - 0 h2h
4 Loudoun Utd 17 27     h2h
5 San Antonio 16 27 0 - 0 3 Aug h2h
6 North Carolina 16 26     h2h
7 New Mexico 16 25 2 - 1 31 Aug h2h
8 Sacramento R. 16 24
9 Orange County 16 23 2 Oct 2 - 1 h2h
10 Pittsburgh 17 23     h2h
11 El Paso 16 23 3 - 0 24 Aug h2h
12 Phoenix Rising 17 23 14 Sep 2 - 2 h2h
13 Monterey Bay 18 22 10 Aug 28 Sep h2h
14 Detroit City 17 21     h2h
15 Indy Eleven 16 20 1 - 1   h2h
16 Oakland Roots 17 20 17 Aug 0 - 1 h2h
17 Lexington 17 19 0 - 0 17 Oct h2h
18 Miami FC 17 19 26 Oct   h2h
19 Colorado S. 16 18 2 - 2 21 Sep h2h
20 Birmingham L. 18 18   1 - 0 h2h
21 Las Vegas L. 17 18 5 - 0 0 - 2 h2h
22 Rhode Island 17 17   0 - 2 h2h
23 Hartford A. 16 16   11 Oct h2h
24 Tampa Bay 16 14   6 Sep h2h

Sacramento R. stats rank the team in 8th position in the the league table with 24 points, 1 point behind New Mexico. The above table shows Sacramento R. results against each league opponent. The tables below provide additional statistics regarding Sacramento R.'s season in the league.








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 14 822
GF per match 1.561.14 1.38
Goals conceded (GA) 6612
GA per match 0.670.86 0.75
GF + GA per match 2.222.002.13
GF+GA over 0.5 78%100%88%
GF+GA over 1.5 67%57%62%
GF+GA over 2.5 44%29%38%
GF+GA over 3.5 22%14%19%
GF+GA over 4.5 11%0%6%
GF+GA over 5.5 0%0%0%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 67%29%50%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 22%14%19%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 11%14%12%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 44%43%44%
Won-to-nil 22%43%31%
Failed to score 33%29%31%
Lost-to-nil 11%29%19%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 67%71%69%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 44%14%31%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 67%57%62%
Scored in both halves 44%0%25%
Both teams scored 44%29%38%
Conceding Rate 56%57%56%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 33%29%31%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 22%57%38%
Conceded in both halves 0%29%12%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 67%71%69%
GF over 1.5 44%43%44%
GF over 2.5 22%0%12%
GF over 3.5 11%0%6%
GF over 4.5 11%0%6%
GA over 0.5 56%57%56%
GA over 1.5 11%29%19%
GA over 2.5 0%0%0%
GA over 3.5 0%0%0%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Sacramento R. matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 22%0%12%
Match total goals = 1 11%43%25%
Match total goals = 2 22%29%25%
Match total goals = 3 22%14%19%
Match total goals = 4 11%14%12%
Match total goals = 5+ 11%0%6%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 33%43%38%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 44%43%44%
Match total goals = 4+ 22%14%19%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  10 11
Away wins  12 00
Home & Away wins  22 11
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  10 00
Away defeats  30 00
Home & Away defeats  40 00

A majority of Sacramento R.'s wins have been obtained with a margin of 2 goals or more (4 wins), while 2 of their wins had a one-goal margin.

A majority of Sacramento R.'s defeats had a one-goal margin (4 defeats), while 0 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 58%
42%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.56
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)1.43
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 64%
36%
  % Goals conceded 50%
50%
  League average 56%
44%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 31 4  25%
Drawing at HT 45 9  56%
Losing at HT 21 3  19%
  Total 9716







Goal times


 flag Sacramento R.
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 0
GA 1
16-30 GF 3
GA 2
31-45 GF 5
GA 2
46-60 GF 5
GA 1
61-75 GF 6
GA 0
76-90 GF 3
GA 6
1st Half GF 8
36%
GA 5
42%
2nd Half GF 14
64%
GA 7
58%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 55
 Avg. minute goals conceded 58


  Sacramento R.
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 0
GA 1
16-30 GF 2
GA 1
31-45 GF 4
GA 1
46-60 GF 1
GA 0
61-75 GF 4
GA 0
76-90 GF 3
GA 3
1st Half GF 6
43%
GA 3
50%
2nd Half GF 8
57%
GA 3
50%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 59
  Avg. minute goals conceded 56


  Sacramento R.
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 0
GA 0
16-30 GF 1
GA 1
31-45 GF 1
GA 1
46-60 GF 4
GA 1
61-75 GF 2
GA 0
76-90 GF 0
GA 3
1st Half GF 2
25%
GA 2
33%
2nd Half GF 6
75%
GA 4
67%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 49
  Avg. minute goals conceded 60








Sacramento R. scores

FT at home
1-1 2 22%
0-0 2 22%
5-0 1 11%
2-2 1 11%
2-1 1 11%
0-1 1 11%
3-0 1 11%
FT away
0-2 2 29%
1-0 2 29%
2-2 1 14%
2-1 1 14%
0-1 1 14%

Half-time at home
0-0 3 33%
0-1 2 22%
1-0 2 22%
1-1 1 11%
3-0 1 11%
Half-time away
0-0 5 71%
1-2 1 14%
1-0 1 14%





This season in the league
Sacramento R. have kept a clean sheet in each of their last 4 matches. 50% of Sacramento R.'s conceded goals occurred after the 75th minute.


 flag

FC Tulsa

 (this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 8 4 2 2  
  Away 8 4 3 1  
  Total 16 8 5 3  
PPG (Home): 1.75
PPG (Away): 1.88
PPG (Total): 1.81

Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game1.81 2.00 +10.5%
AVG Goals For1.50 1.75 +16.7%
AVG Goals Against1.00 1.13 +13.0%



FC Tulsa's progression (home & away)
Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
9 Mar Phoenix Rising 0 - 1

     0-1   Alex Dalou (25)
FC Tulsa - + - 0-1 stats
16 Mar FC Tulsa 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Patrick Seagrist (73)
Tampa Bay - + - 0-0 stats
23 Mar FC Tulsa 0 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Pedro Dolabella (82)
North Carolina - - + 0-0 stats
29 Mar FC Tulsa 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Taylor Calheira (87)
Sacramento R. - + - 0-0 stats
13 Apr FC Tulsa 1 - 2

     0-1   Wolfgang Prentice (31)
1-1   Owen Damm (42)
     1-2   Wolfgang Prentice (45)
Oakland Roots + - - 1-2 stats
20 Apr Las Vegas L. 1 - 4

     0-1   Stefan Lukic (14)
     0-2   Taylor Calheira (28) pen.
     0-3   Alex Dalou (42)
---------------------------------------
1-3   Valentin Noël (51) pen.
     1-4   Taylor Calheira (67)
FC Tulsa + - - 0-3 stats
4 May Orange County 2 - 1

---------------------------------------
1-0   Lyam MacKinnon (55)
     1-1   Taylor Calheira (74)
2-1   Lyam MacKinnon (80)
FC Tulsa + - - 0-0 stats
11 May FC Tulsa 1 - 1

     0-1   Wilmer Cabrera (32)
---------------------------------------
1-1   Kalil ElMedkhar (86)
El Paso - - - 0-1 stats
18 May Lexington 0 - 2

     0-1   Taylor Calheira (41) pen.
---------------------------------------
     0-2   Lamar Batista (90)
FC Tulsa - + - 0-1 stats
29 May San Antonio 1 - 1

1-0   Jorge Hernandez (45) pen.
---------------------------------------
     1-1   Taylor Calheira (70) pen.
FC Tulsa - - - 1-0 stats
8 Jun Sacramento R. 0 - 1

     0-1   Kalil ElMedkhar (10)
FC Tulsa - + - 0-1 stats
15 Jun FC Tulsa 1 - 1

     0-1   Ihsan Sacko (15)
---------------------------------------
1-1   Arthur Rogers (80)
Phoenix Rising - - - 0-1 stats
5 Jul Miami FC 2 - 2

     0-1   Taylor Calheira (13) pen.
1-1   Francisco Bonfiglio (17) pen.
     1-2   Eliot Goldthorp (45)
---------------------------------------
2-2   Francisco Bonfiglio (65)
FC Tulsa + - - 1-2 stats
13 Jul FC Tulsa 4 - 3

1-0   Marcos Serrato (9)
2-0   Jamie Craig Webber (16)
     2-1   Johnny Rodriguez (33)
     2-2   Shawn Smart (45)
---------------------------------------
     2-3   Shawn Smart (62)
3-3   Taylor Calheira (76)
4-3   Elias Gärtig (o.g.) (90)
Las Vegas L. + - - 2-2 stats
17 Jul FC Tulsa 2 - 1

     0-1   Mayele Malango (9)
---------------------------------------
1-1   Boubacar Diallo (47)
2-1   Stefan Lukic (48)
Monterey Bay + - - 0-1 stats
20 Jul Louisville City 1 - 1

---------------------------------------
1-0   Cameron Lancaster (90)
     1-1   Kalil ElMedkhar (90)
FC Tulsa - - - 0-0 stats



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
2 Aug FC Tulsa h2h Loudoun Utd 1.75 1.25
7 Aug Monterey Bay h2h FC Tulsa 2.00 1.88
10 Aug FC Tulsa h2h New Mexico 1.75 1.33
16 Aug Hartford A. h2h FC Tulsa 1.22 1.88
24 Aug FC Tulsa h2h Orange County 1.75 0.57
31 Aug Colorado S. h2h FC Tulsa 1.33 1.88
7 Sep FC Tulsa h2h Birmingham L. 1.75 1.13
14 Sep New Mexico h2h FC Tulsa 1.86 1.88
21 Sep Oakland Roots h2h FC Tulsa 0.89 1.88
27 Sep Indy Eleven h2h FC Tulsa 1.33 1.88
5 Oct FC Tulsa h2h Lexington 1.75 0.75
12 Oct FC Tulsa h2h San Antonio 1.75 1.57
19 Oct El Paso h2h FC Tulsa 1.57 1.88
26 Oct FC Tulsa h2h Colorado S. 1.75 1.00
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.27

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins 2--
Consecutive draws -21
Consecutive defeats ---
No win -21
No draw 2--
No defeat 459
1 goal scored or more 6813
1 goal conceded or more 525
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded ---
GF+GA over 2.5 2--
GF+GA under 2.5 -11
Scored at least twice 2--










Comparison with league average


FC Tulsa (16 matches) vs league average

(overall)FC Tulsa League AVG
Points per game  1.81 1.38
% Wins  50% 38%
% Draws  31% 24%
% Defeats  19% 38%
Goals scored per game  1.50 1.30
Goals conceded per game  1.00 1.30
% Clean sheets  31% 27%
% Failed To Score  6% 27%
% Won To Nil  31% 19%
% Lost To Nil  6% 19%
% Team scored first  50% 46%
% Opponent scored first  50% 46%
Average minute scored first  34 33
Average minute conceded first  45 33
Lead-defending rate  73% 61%
Equalizing rate  73% 39%
% Time leading  27% 25%
% Time level in goals  53% 51%
% Time trailing  20% 25%
PPG when scored first  2.75 2.18
PPG when conceded first  0.88 0.64
Total goals per game  2.50 2.61
% over 1.5 goals  69% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  38% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  19% 24%
% both teams scored  62% 54%

FC Tulsa at home (8 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)FC Tulsa League AVG
Points per game  1.75 1.57
% Wins  50% 44%
% Draws  25% 24%
% Defeats  25% 32%
Goals scored per game  1.38 1.45
Goals conceded per game  1.13 1.16
% Clean sheets  25% 31%
% Failed To Score  12% 22%
% Won To Nil  25% 24%
% Lost To Nil  12% 15%
% Team scored first  38% 52%
% Opponent scored first  62% 40%
Average minute scored first  56 33
Average minute conceded first  34 32
Lead-defending rate  80% 65%
Equalizing rate  71% 43%
% Time leading  14% 28%
% Time level in goals  54% 51%
% Time trailing  33% 22%
PPG when scored first  3.00 2.29
PPG when conceded first  1.00 0.74
Total goals per game  2.50 2.61
% over 1.5 goals  62% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  38% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  12% 24%
% both teams scored  62% 54%

FC Tulsa away (8 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)FC Tulsa League AVG
Points per game  1.88 1.19
% Wins  50% 32%
% Draws  38% 24%
% Defeats  12% 44%
Goals scored per game  1.63 1.16
Goals conceded per game  0.88 1.45
% Clean sheets  38% 22%
% Failed To Score  0% 31%
% Won To Nil  38% 15%
% Lost To Nil  0% 24%
% Team scored first  62% 40%
% Opponent scored first  38% 52%
Average minute scored first  21 32
Average minute conceded first  63 33
Lead-defending rate  67% 57%
Equalizing rate  75% 35%
% Time leading  41% 22%
% Time level in goals  52% 51%
% Time trailing  8% 28%
PPG when scored first  2.60 2.04
PPG when conceded first  0.67 0.56
Total goals per game  2.50 2.61
% over 1.5 goals  75% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  38% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  25% 24%
% both teams scored  62% 54%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag FC Tulsa
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 8 / 16 50%
  Opponent scored first 8 / 16 50%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 5 / 16 31%
  Opponent was leading at HT 5 / 16 31%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 24.5 min. 27%
  Average minutes level in goals 47.4 min. 53%
  Average minutes trailing 18.1 min. 20%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, FC Tulsa have been in the lead for an average duration of 24.5 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 18.1 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag FC Tulsa
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 16

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 11
  Equalizer goals conceded 3
  Lead defending rate * (1) 73%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 11
  Equalizer goals scored 8
  Equalizing rate * (2) 73%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 5
  Non-crucial goals conceded 2

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
FC Tulsa have taken the lead 11 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 73% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 27%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 11 times that FC Tulsa's opponents have taken the lead, FC Tulsa have managed to score an equalizer on 8 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 73%.


 flag FC Tulsa
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 3 / 8 38%
  Opponent scored first 5 / 8 62%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 0 / 8 0%
  Opponent was leading at HT 4 / 8 50%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 12.3 min. 14%
  Average minutes level in goals 48.4 min. 54%
  Average minutes trailing 29.4 min. 33%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, FC Tulsa have been in the lead for an average duration of 12.3 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 29.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag FC Tulsa
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 8

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 5
  Equalizer goals conceded 1
  Lead defending rate * (1) 80%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 7
  Equalizer goals scored 5
  Equalizing rate * (2) 71%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 1
  Non-crucial goals conceded 1

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, FC Tulsa have taken the lead 5 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 80% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 20%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 7 times that FC Tulsa's opponents have taken the lead when FC Tulsa were playing at home, FC Tulsa have managed to score an equalizer on 5 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 71%.



 flag FC Tulsa
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 5 / 8 62%
  Opponent scored first 3 / 8 38%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 5 / 8 62%
  Opponent was leading at HT 1 / 8 12%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 36.8 min. 41%
  Average minutes level in goals 46.5 min. 52%
  Average minutes trailing 6.8 min. 8%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, FC Tulsa have been in the lead for an average duration of 36.8 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 6.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag FC Tulsa
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 8

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 6
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 67%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 4
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 75%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 4
  Non-crucial goals conceded 1

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, FC Tulsa have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 67% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 33%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 4 times that FC Tulsa's opponents have taken the lead when FC Tulsa were playing away, FC Tulsa have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 75%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Charleston 18 41     h2h
2 Louisville City 17 38   1 - 1 h2h
3 FC Tulsa 16 29
4 Loudoun Utd 17 27 2 Aug   h2h
5 San Antonio 16 27 12 Oct 1 - 1 h2h
6 North Carolina 16 26 0 - 1   h2h
7 New Mexico 16 25 10 Aug 14 Sep h2h
8 Sacramento R. 16 24 1 - 0 0 - 1 h2h
9 Orange County 16 23 24 Aug 2 - 1 h2h
10 Pittsburgh 17 23     h2h
11 El Paso 16 23 1 - 1 19 Oct h2h
12 Phoenix Rising 17 23 1 - 1 0 - 1 h2h
13 Monterey Bay 18 22 2 - 1 7 Aug h2h
14 Detroit City 17 21     h2h
15 Indy Eleven 16 20   27 Sep h2h
16 Oakland Roots 17 20 1 - 2 21 Sep h2h
17 Lexington 17 19 5 Oct 0 - 2 h2h
18 Miami FC 17 19   2 - 2 h2h
19 Colorado S. 16 18 26 Oct 31 Aug h2h
20 Birmingham L. 18 18 7 Sep   h2h
21 Las Vegas L. 17 18 4 - 3 1 - 4 h2h
22 Rhode Island 17 17     h2h
23 Hartford A. 16 16   16 Aug h2h
24 Tampa Bay 16 14 1 - 0   h2h

FC Tulsa stats rank the team in 3rd position in the the league table with 29 points, 9 points behind Louisville City. The above table shows FC Tulsa results against each league opponent. The tables below provide additional statistics regarding FC Tulsa's season in the league.








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 11 1324
GF per match 1.381.63 1.50
Goals conceded (GA) 9716
GA per match 1.130.88 1.00
GF + GA per match 2.502.502.50
GF+GA over 0.5 100%100%100%
GF+GA over 1.5 62%75%69%
GF+GA over 2.5 38%38%38%
GF+GA over 3.5 12%25%19%
GF+GA over 4.5 12%12%12%
GF+GA over 5.5 12%0%6%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 62%75%69%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 25%25%25%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 25%25%25%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 25%38%31%
Won-to-nil 25%38%31%
Failed to score 12%0%6%
Lost-to-nil 12%0%6%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 88%100%94%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 25%62%44%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 75%62%69%
Scored in both halves 12%25%19%
Both teams scored 62%62%62%
Conceding Rate 75%62%69%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 62%25%44%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 25%50%38%
Conceded in both halves 12%12%12%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 88%100%94%
GF over 1.5 25%38%31%
GF over 2.5 12%12%12%
GF over 3.5 12%12%12%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 75%62%69%
GA over 1.5 25%25%25%
GA over 2.5 12%0%6%
GA over 3.5 0%0%0%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in FC Tulsa matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 0%0%0%
Match total goals = 1 38%25%31%
Match total goals = 2 25%38%31%
Match total goals = 3 25%12%19%
Match total goals = 4 0%12%6%
Match total goals = 5+ 12%12%12%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 38%25%31%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 50%50%50%
Match total goals = 4+ 12%25%19%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  40 00
Away wins  21 10
Home & Away wins  61 10
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  20 00
Away defeats  10 00
Home & Away defeats  30 00

A majority of FC Tulsa's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (6 wins), while 2 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more.

A majority of FC Tulsa's defeats had a one-goal margin (3 defeats), while 0 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 48%
52%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.75
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)1.88
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 46%
54%
  % Goals conceded 56%
44%
  League average 56%
44%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 05 5  31%
Drawing at HT 42 6  38%
Losing at HT 41 5  31%
  Total 8816







Goal times


 flag FC Tulsa
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 4
GA 2
16-30 GF 3
GA 1
31-45 GF 4
GA 6
46-60 GF 2
GA 2
61-75 GF 4
GA 2
76-90 GF 7
GA 3
1st Half GF 11
46%
GA 9
56%
2nd Half GF 13
54%
GA 7
44%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 53
 Avg. minute goals conceded 47


  FC Tulsa
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 1
GA 2
16-30 GF 1
GA 0
31-45 GF 1
GA 5
46-60 GF 2
GA 0
61-75 GF 1
GA 1
76-90 GF 5
GA 1
1st Half GF 3
27%
GA 7
78%
2nd Half GF 8
73%
GA 2
22%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 59
  Avg. minute goals conceded 39


  FC Tulsa
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 3
GA 0
16-30 GF 2
GA 1
31-45 GF 3
GA 1
46-60 GF 0
GA 2
61-75 GF 3
GA 1
76-90 GF 2
GA 2
1st Half GF 8
62%
GA 2
29%
2nd Half GF 5
38%
GA 5
71%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 47
  Avg. minute goals conceded 58








FC Tulsa scores

FT at home
1-1 2 25%
1-0 2 25%
4-3 1 12%
1-2 1 12%
2-1 1 12%
0-1 1 12%
FT away
1-1 2 25%
0-1 2 25%
1-4 1 12%
2-2 1 12%
0-2 1 12%
2-1 1 12%

Half-time at home
0-1 3 38%
0-0 3 38%
2-2 1 12%
1-2 1 12%
Half-time away
0-1 3 38%
0-0 2 25%
0-3 1 12%
1-2 1 12%
1-0 1 12%





This season in the league
FC Tulsa have been undefeated in their last 9 matches. FC Tulsa have scored in each of their last 13 matches. FC Tulsa conceded at least one goal in 6 of their 8 home matches. FC Tulsa have scored in each of their 8 away matches. FC Tulsa have been undefeated in their last 5 away matches. FC Tulsa have scored in each of their last 8 away matches. FC Tulsa failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 5 home matches.








Tables overview

Points

GP pts
Charleston 18 41
Louisville C. 17 38
FC Tulsa 16 29
Loudoun Utd 17 27
San Antonio 16 27
North Caroli. 16 26
New Mexico 16 25
Sacramento R. 16 24
Orange County 16 23
Pittsburgh 17 23
El Paso 16 23
Phoenix Risi. 17 23
Monterey Bay 18 22
Detroit City 17 21
Indy Eleven 16 20
Oakland Roots 17 20
Lexington 17 19
Miami FC 17 19
Colorado S. 16 18
Birmingham L. 18 18
Las Vegas L. 17 18
Rhode Island 17 17
Hartford A. 16 16
Tampa Bay 16 14

Form (last 8)

GP pts
Louisville C. 8 19
Charleston 8 17
FC Tulsa 8 16
North Caroli. 8 15
Pittsburgh 8 15
Sacramento R. 8 14
Orange County 8 13
Indy Eleven 8 13
Phoenix Risi. 8 13
Lexington 8 12
Hartford A. 8 11
Colorado S. 8 11
San Antonio 8 11
El Paso 8 11
New Mexico 8 10
Tampa Bay 8 10
Oakland Roots 8 10
Miami FC 8 9
Birmingham L. 8 8
Loudoun Utd 8 6
Las Vegas L. 8 6
Monterey Bay 8 6
Rhode Island 8 5
Detroit City 8 5

Home

GP pts
Charleston 9 24
Louisville C. 8 20
Orange County 9 19
Loudoun Utd 9 17
Pittsburgh 8 17
North Caroli. 8 16
San Antonio 9 16
Monterey Bay 8 16
Sacramento R. 9 14
FC Tulsa 8 14
New Mexico 7 13
Lexington 9 13
Las Vegas L. 10 13
Indy Eleven 9 12
Hartford A. 9 11
El Paso 7 11
Miami FC 10 11
Detroit City 7 9
Birmingham L. 10 9
Phoenix Risi. 7 8
Colorado S. 6 8
Oakland Roots 9 8
Rhode Island 8 7
Tampa Bay 7 7

Away

GP pts
Louisville C. 9 18
Charleston 9 17
FC Tulsa 8 15
Phoenix Risi. 10 15
Oakland Roots 8 12
New Mexico 9 12
Detroit City 10 12
El Paso 9 12
San Antonio 7 11
Sacramento R. 7 10
North Caroli. 8 10
Rhode Island 9 10
Colorado S. 10 10
Loudoun Utd 8 10
Birmingham L. 8 9
Indy Eleven 7 8
Miami FC 7 8
Tampa Bay 9 7
Pittsburgh 9 6
Lexington 8 6
Monterey Bay 10 6
Hartford A. 7 5
Las Vegas L. 7 5
Orange County 7 4

Offence

GP GF
Charleston 18 38
Louisville C. 17 30
Phoenix Risi. 17 27
Indy Eleven 16 26
Loudoun Utd 17 26
Orange County 16 26
North Caroli. 16 25
El Paso 16 24
FC Tulsa 16 24
San Antonio 16 23
New Mexico 16 22
Sacramento R. 16 22
Detroit City 17 20
Birmingham L. 18 19
Colorado S. 16 19
Hartford A. 16 19
Monterey Bay 18 19
Oakland Roots 17 19
Lexington 17 17
Miami FC 17 17
Tampa Bay 16 17
Pittsburgh 17 15
Rhode Island 17 14
Las Vegas L. 17 13

Defence

GP GA
Sacramento R. 16 12
Louisville C. 17 13
Pittsburgh 17 15
FC Tulsa 16 16
Charleston 18 16
Rhode Island 17 18
North Caroli. 16 20
San Antonio 16 21
New Mexico 16 21
Hartford A. 16 21
Detroit City 17 22
Colorado S. 16 22
Orange County 16 23
Monterey Bay 18 23
Lexington 17 23
Loudoun Utd 17 24
Tampa Bay 16 25
Oakland Roots 17 25
Miami FC 17 25
El Paso 16 25
Birmingham L. 18 25
Las Vegas L. 17 28
Indy Eleven 16 28
Phoenix Risi. 17 30






Total Match Goals stats


Total match goals stats

Matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Indy Eleven  16 3.38 100% 75% 62% 56% 19% 12% 69% 25% 6% 25% 6%
Phoenix Rising  17 3.35 100% 82% 65% 47% 24% 6% 76% 12% 12% 12% 12%
El Paso  16 3.06 94% 88% 75% 25% 6% 6% 69% 12% 25% 6% 19%
Orange County  16 3.06 94% 81% 75% 38% 12% 6% 50% 19% 38% 12% 31%
Charleston  18 3.00 94% 83% 72% 33% 11% 6% 67% 28% 11% 22% 6%
Loudoun Utd  17 2.94 94% 88% 59% 29% 18% 6% 59% 18% 29% 12% 24%
North Carolina  16 2.81 100% 69% 56% 25% 19% 12% 62% 25% 12% 25% 12%
San Antonio  16 2.75 88% 75% 62% 25% 19% 6% 56% 38% 19% 25% 6%
New Mexico  16 2.69 100% 69% 62% 19% 12% 6% 44% 38% 19% 38% 19%
Tampa Bay  16 2.63 100% 75% 69% 19% 0% 0% 69% 6% 25% 6% 25%
Oakland Roots  17 2.59 88% 71% 53% 18% 18% 12% 41% 35% 35% 24% 24%
Colorado S.  16 2.56 94% 69% 50% 31% 12% 0% 69% 25% 12% 19% 6%
Louisville City  17 2.53 94% 88% 41% 12% 12% 6% 65% 35% 6% 29% 0%
FC Tulsa  16 2.50 100% 69% 38% 19% 12% 6% 62% 31% 6% 31% 6%
Hartford A.  16 2.50 88% 62% 44% 19% 12% 12% 38% 31% 44% 19% 31%
Detroit City  17 2.47 82% 82% 41% 29% 12% 0% 47% 35% 35% 18% 18%
Miami FC  17 2.47 100% 82% 53% 12% 0% 0% 65% 12% 24% 12% 24%
Birmingham L.  18 2.44 94% 61% 39% 33% 11% 6% 56% 11% 39% 6% 33%
Las Vegas L.  17 2.41 82% 53% 41% 29% 24% 6% 24% 47% 47% 29% 29%
Lexington  17 2.35 82% 76% 41% 18% 12% 6% 59% 29% 29% 12% 12%
Monterey Bay  18 2.33 89% 78% 50% 11% 6% 0% 50% 17% 44% 6% 33%
Sacramento R.  16 2.13 88% 62% 38% 19% 6% 0% 38% 44% 31% 31% 19%
Rhode Island  17 1.88 88% 65% 29% 6% 0% 0% 29% 29% 53% 18% 41%
Pittsburgh  17 1.76 88% 59% 24% 6% 0% 0% 35% 41% 35% 29% 24%
League average 92.5% 73.5% 51.5% 24.0% 11.5% 5.0% 54.0% 26.8% 26.8% 19.3% 19.3%

Total match goals stats (last 8 matches)

Last 8 matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
North Carolina  8 3.25 100% 62% 62% 38% 38% 25% 62% 25% 12% 25% 12%
Orange County  8 3.25 88% 88% 88% 50% 12% 0% 50% 38% 25% 25% 12%
Indy Eleven  8 3.13 100% 50% 50% 38% 25% 25% 38% 50% 12% 50% 12%
Louisville City  8 3.13 100% 88% 62% 25% 25% 12% 75% 25% 0% 25% 0%
New Mexico  8 3.13 100% 88% 75% 25% 12% 12% 50% 25% 25% 25% 25%
Loudoun Utd  8 3.00 88% 88% 62% 38% 25% 0% 62% 12% 38% 0% 25%
FC Tulsa  8 2.88 100% 88% 38% 25% 12% 12% 75% 25% 0% 25% 0%
Hartford A.  8 2.88 88% 62% 62% 25% 12% 12% 38% 38% 38% 25% 25%
Las Vegas L.  8 2.88 100% 75% 50% 25% 12% 12% 25% 25% 50% 25% 50%
Phoenix Rising  8 2.88 100% 75% 50% 38% 25% 0% 62% 25% 12% 25% 12%
San Antonio  8 2.75 88% 75% 62% 25% 12% 12% 50% 38% 25% 25% 12%
El Paso  8 2.63 88% 88% 75% 12% 0% 0% 62% 12% 38% 0% 25%
Monterey Bay  8 2.63 100% 100% 62% 0% 0% 0% 50% 0% 50% 0% 50%
Detroit City  8 2.50 88% 88% 38% 25% 12% 0% 50% 25% 38% 12% 25%
Tampa Bay  8 2.50 100% 75% 62% 12% 0% 0% 62% 12% 25% 12% 25%
Charleston  8 2.25 88% 62% 50% 12% 12% 0% 50% 38% 25% 25% 12%
Miami FC  8 2.25 100% 75% 38% 12% 0% 0% 50% 25% 25% 25% 25%
Oakland Roots  8 2.25 88% 62% 38% 12% 12% 12% 25% 50% 38% 38% 25%
Birmingham L.  8 2.13 88% 38% 25% 25% 25% 12% 38% 25% 50% 12% 38%
Lexington  8 2.00 88% 75% 38% 0% 0% 0% 62% 25% 25% 12% 12%
Pittsburgh  8 1.75 88% 50% 25% 12% 0% 0% 38% 50% 25% 38% 12%
Sacramento R.  8 1.75 75% 50% 25% 12% 12% 0% 0% 75% 50% 50% 25%
Colorado S.  8 1.63 88% 38% 25% 12% 0% 0% 38% 50% 25% 38% 12%
Rhode Island  8 1.63 88% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 38% 12% 62% 0% 50%
League average 92.2% 70.3% 49.5% 20.8% 12.0% 6.3% 47.9% 30.2% 29.7% 22.4% 21.9%

Total match goals stats (at home)

Home matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
El Paso  7 4.00 100% 100% 100% 43% 14% 14% 71% 14% 14% 14% 14%
Orange County  9 3.89 100% 100% 100% 56% 22% 11% 67% 11% 22% 11% 22%
North Carolina  8 3.63 100% 88% 75% 38% 38% 25% 88% 12% 0% 12% 0%
Indy Eleven  9 3.44 100% 67% 67% 56% 22% 11% 56% 33% 11% 33% 11%
Tampa Bay  7 3.43 100% 100% 100% 43% 0% 0% 86% 0% 14% 0% 14%
Charleston  9 3.33 100% 89% 78% 33% 22% 11% 56% 44% 0% 44% 0%
Monterey Bay  8 3.13 100% 100% 75% 25% 12% 0% 88% 0% 12% 0% 12%
Loudoun Utd  9 3.00 89% 89% 44% 33% 33% 11% 56% 33% 22% 22% 11%
Phoenix Rising  7 3.00 100% 71% 57% 57% 14% 0% 57% 14% 29% 14% 29%
Miami FC  10 2.60 100% 80% 60% 20% 0% 0% 70% 10% 20% 10% 20%
San Antonio  9 2.56 100% 78% 56% 11% 11% 0% 56% 44% 0% 44% 0%
FC Tulsa  8 2.50 100% 62% 38% 12% 12% 12% 62% 25% 12% 25% 12%
Louisville City  8 2.50 88% 88% 38% 12% 12% 12% 50% 50% 12% 38% 0%
New Mexico  7 2.43 100% 57% 43% 14% 14% 14% 57% 43% 0% 43% 0%
Sacramento R.  9 2.22 78% 67% 44% 22% 11% 0% 44% 44% 33% 22% 11%
Detroit City  7 2.14 71% 71% 43% 29% 0% 0% 43% 57% 29% 29% 0%
Pittsburgh  8 2.13 100% 75% 25% 12% 0% 0% 38% 50% 12% 50% 12%
Lexington  9 2.11 78% 78% 33% 11% 11% 0% 56% 33% 33% 11% 11%
Las Vegas L.  10 2.10 90% 50% 30% 20% 20% 0% 30% 50% 30% 40% 20%
Hartford A.  9 2.00 89% 56% 44% 11% 0% 0% 33% 44% 33% 33% 22%
Oakland Roots  9 1.89 78% 67% 44% 0% 0% 0% 22% 44% 56% 22% 33%
Birmingham L.  10 1.70 90% 40% 20% 20% 0% 0% 40% 20% 50% 10% 40%
Colorado S.  6 1.67 100% 50% 17% 0% 0% 0% 50% 33% 17% 33% 17%
Rhode Island  8 1.38 75% 50% 12% 0% 0% 0% 38% 25% 62% 0% 38%
League average 92.5% 73.5% 51.5% 24.0% 11.5% 5.0% 54.0% 31.0% 22.5% 23.5% 15.0%

Total match goals stats (away)

Away matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Phoenix Rising  10 3.60 100% 90% 70% 40% 30% 10% 90% 10% 0% 10% 0%
Birmingham L.  8 3.38 100% 88% 62% 50% 25% 12% 75% 0% 25% 0% 25%
Oakland Roots  8 3.38 100% 75% 62% 38% 38% 25% 62% 25% 12% 25% 12%
Indy Eleven  7 3.29 100% 86% 57% 57% 14% 14% 86% 14% 0% 14% 0%
Hartford A.  7 3.14 86% 71% 43% 29% 29% 29% 43% 14% 57% 0% 43%
Colorado S.  10 3.10 90% 80% 70% 50% 20% 0% 80% 20% 10% 10% 0%
San Antonio  7 3.00 71% 71% 71% 43% 29% 14% 57% 29% 43% 0% 14%
New Mexico  9 2.89 100% 78% 78% 22% 11% 0% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33%
Loudoun Utd  8 2.88 100% 88% 75% 25% 0% 0% 62% 0% 38% 0% 38%
Las Vegas L.  7 2.86 71% 57% 57% 43% 29% 14% 14% 43% 71% 14% 43%
Detroit City  10 2.70 90% 90% 40% 30% 20% 0% 50% 20% 40% 10% 30%
Charleston  9 2.67 89% 78% 67% 33% 0% 0% 78% 11% 22% 0% 11%
Lexington  8 2.63 88% 75% 50% 25% 12% 12% 62% 25% 25% 12% 12%
Louisville City  9 2.56 100% 89% 44% 11% 11% 0% 78% 22% 0% 22% 0%
FC Tulsa  8 2.50 100% 75% 38% 25% 12% 0% 62% 38% 0% 38% 0%
El Paso  9 2.33 89% 78% 56% 11% 0% 0% 67% 11% 33% 0% 22%
Rhode Island  9 2.33 100% 78% 44% 11% 0% 0% 22% 33% 44% 33% 44%
Miami FC  7 2.29 100% 86% 43% 0% 0% 0% 57% 14% 29% 14% 29%
North Carolina  8 2.00 100% 50% 38% 12% 0% 0% 38% 38% 25% 38% 25%
Orange County  7 2.00 86% 57% 43% 14% 0% 0% 29% 29% 57% 14% 43%
Sacramento R.  7 2.00 100% 57% 29% 14% 0% 0% 29% 43% 29% 43% 29%
Tampa Bay  9 2.00 100% 56% 44% 0% 0% 0% 56% 11% 33% 11% 33%
Monterey Bay  10 1.70 80% 60% 30% 0% 0% 0% 20% 30% 70% 10% 50%
Pittsburgh  9 1.44 78% 44% 22% 0% 0% 0% 33% 33% 56% 11% 33%
League average 92.5% 73.5% 51.5% 24.0% 11.5% 5.0% 54.0% 22.5% 31.0% 15.0% 23.5%




Segments Table

0 pt Segments table progression arrow 41 pts
5th Segment 4th Segment 3rd Segment 2nd Segment 1st Segment
up to 7.8 pts from 7.9 to 16.1 pts from 16.2 to 24.4 pts from 24.5 to 32.7 pts from 32.8 to 41 pts
(16)  16  Hartford A.
(16)  14  Tampa Bay 		(16)  24  Sacramento R.
(16)  23  Orange County
(17)  23  Pittsburgh
(16)  23  El Paso
(17)  23  Phoenix Rising
(18)  22  Monterey Bay
(17)  21  Detroit City
(16)  20  Indy Eleven
(17)  20  Oakland Roots
(17)  19  Lexington
(17)  19  Miami FC
(16)  18  Colorado S.
(18)  18  Birmingham L.
(17)  18  Las Vegas L.
(17)  17  Rhode Island 		(16)  29  FC Tulsa
(17)  27  Loudoun Utd
(16)  27  San Antonio
(16)  26  North Carolina
(16)  25  New Mexico 		(18)  41  Charleston
(17)  38  Louisville City

The Segments Table is a visual representation splitting the teams into 5 segments. Each team is assigned to a specific segment, depending on the team's number of points. Each of the 5 segments spans one-fifth (20%) of the total points held by the team ranked 1st in the league. For each team, the number of matches played appears in green between brackets, and the number of points is displayed in black.








Sat 2 Aug
TUL - LOU 		Sat 2 Aug
COL - LEX 		Sun 3 Aug
IND - TPB 		Sun 3 Aug
PIT - RHO 		Sun 3 Aug
LOU - NCA 		Sun 3 Aug
ELP - VEG 		Sun 3 Aug
SAN - SAC 		Sun 3 Aug
PHO - BIR 		Thu 7 Aug
RHO - DET 		Thu 7 Aug
HAR - MIA




League statistics

200 matches played / 360
55.6% completed
Home wins:  44%
Over 1.5 goals:  74%
Draws:  24%
Over 2.5 goals:  52%
Away wins:  32%
Over 3.5 goals:  24%
Goals:  521 Home goals per match:  1.45
Goals per match:  2.61 Away goals per match:  1.16
    Both teams scored:  54%

Results

 Latest results
 Matches by date
 Matches by Matchweek
 Results grid
 Results filter
 Outcome Surprise-Levels

Tables

 Home / Away tables
 Wide table
 Tables by Date
 Form tables
 Projected points

Analysis

 Goals statistics
 Points performance
 Over / Under
 Scored / Conceded
 Home advantage
 Relative form
 Run-in analysis

Goal times

 When goals were scored
 1st-half / 2nd-half
 First team to score
 Goal types
 Lead durations
 Points Won/Lost
Home team scored first: 52% No goal scored: 8% Away team scored first: 40%
Average minute when home team scored first: 33 min. Average minute when away team scored first: 32 min.
Home team lead-defending rate: 65% Away team lead-defending rate: 57%
Home team equalizing rate: 43% Away team equalizing rate: 35%
Home team lead duration: 28% Teams level in goals: 51% Away team lead duration: 22%
Home PPG when home team scored first: 2.29 Away PPG when away team scored first: 2.04

More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 200 matches played in the league, a total of 521 goals have been scored (2.61 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including the league results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded.

 

SoccerSTATS.com - Public edition

SoccerSTATS.com provides football statistics, results and blog articles on national and international soccer competitions worldwide. Football fans can keep a tab on stats related to their favourite team or leagues of interest, and access a wide range of team performance data analytics and league standings, not only on the world's most famous professional leagues, but also on amateur and regional leagues over the world. Example of soccer statistics include league standings, form tables, top goal scorers, scoring stats, statistical previews and goal timing statistics.
Follow us on Twitter
F.A.Q. Contact Privacy Policy Change consent
Terms & conditions of use About us Cookie usage and options
Mobile app

Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. Products, services, promotional offers and other offerings from partners and advertisers are subject to terms and conditions. By using this website you certify that you agree with the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy and that you are over the age of 18 or that you have the permission of a parent or guardian to use this website, after your parent or guardian has carefully reviewed and agreed to the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy. The website's content is provided for informational purposes only is not to be relied upon as a professional opinion whatsover. Nothing on this website should be considered as advice. This website is not associated with nor endorsed by any league or competition (whether professional, collegiate or other types of leagues / competitions), federation, association, club or team. All trademarks, brands, images, logos and names appearing on this website belong to their respective owners.
Useful links (third-party websites):   www.gamcare.org.uk       www.begambleaware.org        gamblingtherapy.org
   
Copyright 1998-2025 SoccerSTATS.com
back to top