SoccerSTATS.com back to top
LEAGUES MATCHES STATS FAV BLOG LOGIN
usa3
USA - USL League One
LATEST MATCHES FORM TABLES HEAD-TO-HEAD GOALS HALF-TIME TIMING FIRST GOAL FAVOURITE STATS
🔍

Texoma vs Charlotte I.

advertisement


Visual table

  GP Pts
1  Spokane V. 18 35
2  Chattanooga RW 18 34
3  Naples 19 32
4  One Knoxville 16 28
5  Charlotte I. 19 28
6  Alta 18 27
7  Greenville 19 23
8  Portland Hearts 17 21
9  Texoma 18 21
10  Forward Madison 18 18
11  Union Omaha 17 18
12  Richmond K. 18 17
13  Tormenta 18 16
14  Westchester SC 17 15

 
Sun 4 May 2025
Texoma3 4Charlotte I.
Philip Spengler (22) 1:0
Solomon Asanté (29) 2:0
2:1 Christian Chaney (43)
2:2 Clay Dimick (53)
2:3 Alfredo Midence (55)
Philip Spengler (84) 3:3
3:4 Luis Alvarez pen. (90)






Seasonal streaks


4th consecutive home defeat for Texoma.
2nd consecutive win for Charlotte I..
3rd consecutive game where Texoma scored.
4th consecutive game where Charlotte I. conceded.
2nd consecutive away game where Charlotte I. conceded.
3rd consecutive game where Charlotte I. scored.
6th consecutive game where Texoma conceded.
4th consecutive home game where Texoma conceded.
 

 
Lead durations in 90 minutes of regular time
090
Texoma (31)Level (30)Charlotte I. (29)
Lead durations tables
  How are the duration values calculated?

To calculate the above duration values based on a total of 90 minutes, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are considered scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are considered scored on the 90th minute.






 






 flag

Texoma

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 10 4 1 5  
  Away 8 1 5 2  
  Total 18 5 6 7  
PPG (Home): 1.30
PPG (Away): 1.00
PPG (Total): 1.17

Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game1.17 1.25 +6.8%
AVG Goals For1.33 1.63 +22.6%
AVG Goals Against1.72 1.50 -12.8%



Texoma's progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
23 Mar Texoma 0 - 2

     0-1   Mark Doyle (24)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   K. Tekiela (57)
One Knoxville - - + 0-1 stats
30 Mar Texoma 1 - 3

1-0   Brandon McManus (4)

     1-1   Conor McGlynn (31)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   Oluwatobilba Adewole (48)

     1-3   Jonathan Bolanos (85)
Westchester SC + - - 1-1 stats
6 Apr Texoma 0 - 3

     0-1   Karsen Henderlong (30)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Brecc Evans (53)

     0-3   Jake Dengler (88)
Naples + - + 0-1 stats
13 Apr Spokane V. 4 - 1

1-0   Derek Waldeck (13)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Shavon John-Brown (55)

     2-1   Philip Spengler (60)

3-1   Anuar Peláez (62)

4-1   Ismaila Jome (75)
Texoma + - - 1-0 stats
19 Apr Forward Madison 1 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Brayan Padilla (73)

1-1   Derek Gebhard (90)
Texoma - - - 0-0 stats
4 May Texoma 3 - 4

1-0   Philip Spengler (22)

2-0   Solomon Asanté (29)

     2-1   Christian Chaney (43)

---------------------------------------
     2-2   Clay Dimick (53)

     2-3   Alfredo Midence (55)

3-3   Philip Spengler (84)

     3-4   Luis Alvarez (90) pen.
Charlotte I. + - - 2-1 stats
11 May Alta 0 - 0

Texoma - + + 0-0 stats
18 May Texoma 2 - 1

1-0   Solomon Asanté (26)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Philip Spengler (84)

     2-1   Preston Kilwien (o.g.) (87)
Union Omaha + - - 1-0 stats
25 May Texoma 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Teddy Baker (90)
Greenville - + - 0-0 stats
7 Jun Richmond K. 1 - 2

1-0   Joshua Kirkland (7)

     1-1   Teddy Baker (19)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   Solomon Asanté (73)
Texoma + - - 1-1 stats
15 Jun Texoma 2 - 2

     0-1   Gabriel Alves (9)

1-1   William Perkins (21)

     1-2   Aaron Walker (29)

2-2   Luke McCormick (45)

Tormenta + - - 2-2 stats
22 Jun Texoma 3 - 2

1-0   Philip Spengler (45)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Luke McCormick (66)

     2-1   Fabrice Gael Ngah (76)

     2-2   Christian Chaney (90) pen.

3-2   Solomon Asanté (90)
Charlotte I. + - - 1-0 stats
3 Jul Spokane V. 1 - 1

1-0   Nil Vinyals (45)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Maciej Bortniczuk (64)
Texoma - - - 1-0 stats
6 Jul Texoma 2 - 0

1-0   Brandon McManus (24)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Sergio Chavez (77)
Forward Madison - + - 1-0 stats
13 Jul Texoma 0 - 1

     0-1   N/A (o.g.) (5)

Portland Hearts - - + 0-1 stats
16 Jul Chattanooga RW 1 - 1

1-0   Omar Hernandez (38)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Sergio Chavez (90)
Texoma - - - 1-0 stats
2 Aug Charlotte I. 3 - 3

1-0   Souaibou Marou (14)

2-0   J. Palacios (31)

     2-1   Teddy Baker (39)

---------------------------------------
3-1   Fabrice Gael Ngah (60)

     3-2   Luke McCormick (72)

     3-3   Brandon McManus (83)
Texoma + - - 2-1 stats
9 Aug Naples 2 - 1

1-0   Ian Garrett (23)

2-0   Julian Cisneros (45)

---------------------------------------
     2-1   Luke McCormick (90)
Texoma + - - 2-0 stats



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
17 Aug Texoma h2h Chattanooga RW 1.30 1.44
21 Aug Texoma h2h Alta 1.30 1.00
23 Aug Greenville h2h Texoma 1.67 1.00
28 Aug Forward Madison h2h Texoma 1.20 1.00
5 Sep Union Omaha h2h Texoma 1.33 1.00
14 Sep Texoma h2h Spokane V. 1.30 1.86
21 Sep Westchester SC h2h Texoma 0.75 1.00
27 Sep Portland Hearts h2h Texoma 1.71 1.00
5 Oct Texoma h2h Alta 1.30 1.00
12 Oct Texoma h2h Richmond K. 1.30 1.00
19 Oct One Knoxville h2h Texoma 2.00 1.00
25 Oct Tormenta h2h Texoma 1.00 1.00
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.33

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins ---
Consecutive draws ---
Consecutive defeats 111
No win 144
No draw 311
No defeat ---
1 goal scored or more -53
1 goal conceded or more 154
No goal scored 1--
No goal conceded ---
GF+GA over 2.5 -22
GF+GA under 2.5 2--
Scored at least twice ---










Comparison with league average


Texoma (18 matches) vs league average

(overall)Texoma League AVG
Points per game  1.17 1.33
% Wins  28% 33%
% Draws  33% 34%
% Defeats  39% 33%
Goals scored per game  1.33 1.41
Goals conceded per game  1.72 1.41
% Clean sheets  17% 21%
% Failed To Score  22% 21%
% Won To Nil  11% 14%
% Lost To Nil  17% 14%
% Team scored first  39% 46%
% Opponent scored first  56% 46%
Average minute scored first  41 27
Average minute conceded first  21 27
Lead-defending rate  56% 48%
Equalizing rate  50% 52%
% Time leading  16% 25%
% Time level in goals  46% 50%
% Time trailing  37% 25%
PPG when scored first  1.86 1.90
PPG when conceded first  0.70 0.81
Total goals per game  3.06 2.82
% over 1.5 goals  83% 78%
% over 2.5 goals  56% 55%
% over 3.5 goals  33% 31%
% both teams scored  67% 65%

Texoma at home (10 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Texoma League AVG
Points per game  1.30 1.56
% Wins  40% 41%
% Draws  10% 34%
% Defeats  50% 26%
Goals scored per game  1.40 1.53
Goals conceded per game  1.80 1.29
% Clean sheets  20% 24%
% Failed To Score  30% 18%
% Won To Nil  20% 17%
% Lost To Nil  30% 11%
% Team scored first  60% 54%
% Opponent scored first  40% 38%
Average minute scored first  35 28
Average minute conceded first  17 26
Lead-defending rate  57% 50%
Equalizing rate  38% 54%
% Time leading  26% 31%
% Time level in goals  40% 50%
% Time trailing  34% 20%
PPG when scored first  2.00 2.00
PPG when conceded first  0.25 1.00
Total goals per game  3.20 2.82
% over 1.5 goals  80% 78%
% over 2.5 goals  60% 55%
% over 3.5 goals  40% 31%
% both teams scored  50% 65%

Texoma away (8 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Texoma League AVG
Points per game  1.00 1.10
% Wins  12% 26%
% Draws  62% 34%
% Defeats  25% 41%
Goals scored per game  1.25 1.29
Goals conceded per game  1.63 1.53
% Clean sheets  12% 18%
% Failed To Score  12% 24%
% Won To Nil  0% 11%
% Lost To Nil  0% 17%
% Team scored first  12% 38%
% Opponent scored first  75% 54%
Average minute scored first  73 26
Average minute conceded first  23 28
Lead-defending rate  50% 46%
Equalizing rate  67% 50%
% Time leading  5% 20%
% Time level in goals  54% 50%
% Time trailing  41% 31%
PPG when scored first  1.00 1.77
PPG when conceded first  1.00 0.68
Total goals per game  2.88 2.82
% over 1.5 goals  88% 78%
% over 2.5 goals  50% 55%
% over 3.5 goals  25% 31%
% both teams scored  88% 65%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Texoma
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 7 / 18 39%
  Opponent scored first 10 / 18 56%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 4 / 18 22%
  Opponent was leading at HT 8 / 18 44%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 14.8 min. 16%
  Average minutes level in goals 41.5 min. 46%
  Average minutes trailing 33.7 min. 37%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Texoma have been in the lead for an average duration of 14.8 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 33.7 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Texoma
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 18

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 9
  Equalizer goals conceded 4
  Lead defending rate * (1) 56%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 14
  Equalizer goals scored 7
  Equalizing rate * (2) 50%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 8
  Non-crucial goals conceded 13

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Texoma have taken the lead 9 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 56% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 44%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 14 times that Texoma's opponents have taken the lead, Texoma have managed to score an equalizer on 7 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 50%.


 flag Texoma
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 6 / 10 60%
  Opponent scored first 4 / 10 40%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 4 / 10 40%
  Opponent was leading at HT 3 / 10 30%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 23.3 min. 26%
  Average minutes level in goals 35.7 min. 40%
  Average minutes trailing 31.0 min. 34%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Texoma have been in the lead for an average duration of 23.3 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 31.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Texoma
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 10

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 7
  Equalizer goals conceded 3
  Lead defending rate * (1) 57%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 8
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 38%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 4
  Non-crucial goals conceded 7

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Texoma have taken the lead 7 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 57% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 43%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 8 times that Texoma's opponents have taken the lead when Texoma were playing at home, Texoma have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 38%.



 flag Texoma
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 1 / 8 12%
  Opponent scored first 6 / 8 75%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 0 / 8 0%
  Opponent was leading at HT 5 / 8 62%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 4.3 min. 5%
  Average minutes level in goals 48.8 min. 54%
  Average minutes trailing 37.0 min. 41%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Texoma have been in the lead for an average duration of 4.3 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 37.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Texoma
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 8

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 2
  Equalizer goals conceded 1
  Lead defending rate * (1) 50%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 6
  Equalizer goals scored 4
  Equalizing rate * (2) 67%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 4
  Non-crucial goals conceded 6

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Texoma have taken the lead 2 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 6 times that Texoma's opponents have taken the lead when Texoma were playing away, Texoma have managed to score an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 67%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Spokane V. 18 35   4 - 1 h2h
  1 - 1
2 Chattanooga RW 18 34   1 - 1 h2h
   
3 Naples 19 32 0 - 3 2 - 1 h2h
   
4 One Knoxville 16 28 0 - 2   h2h
   
5 Charlotte I. 19 28 3 - 4 3 - 3 h2h
3 - 2  
6 Alta 18 27   0 - 0 h2h
   
7 Greenville 19 23 1 - 0   h2h
   
8 Portland Hearts 17 21 0 - 1   h2h
   
9 Texoma 18 21
10 Forward Madison 18 18 2 - 0 1 - 1 h2h
   
11 Union Omaha 17 18 2 - 1   h2h
   
12 Richmond K. 18 17   1 - 2 h2h
   
13 Tormenta 18 16 2 - 2   h2h
   
14 Westchester SC 17 15 1 - 3   h2h
   








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 14 1024
GF per match 1.401.25 1.33
Goals conceded (GA) 181331
GA per match 1.801.63 1.72
GF + GA per match 3.202.883.06
GF+GA over 0.5 100%88%94%
GF+GA over 1.5 80%88%83%
GF+GA over 2.5 60%50%56%
GF+GA over 3.5 40%25%33%
GF+GA over 4.5 20%25%22%
GF+GA over 5.5 10%12%11%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 90%75%83%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 30%38%33%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 20%12%17%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 20%12%17%
Won-to-nil 20%0%11%
Failed to score 30%12%22%
Lost-to-nil 30%0%17%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 70%88%78%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 60%25%44%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 50%88%67%
Scored in both halves 40%25%33%
Both teams scored 50%88%67%
Conceding Rate 80%88%83%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 60%75%67%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 60%38%50%
Conceded in both halves 40%25%33%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 70%88%78%
GF over 1.5 50%25%39%
GF over 2.5 20%12%17%
GF over 3.5 0%0%0%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 80%88%83%
GA over 1.5 60%38%50%
GA over 2.5 30%25%28%
GA over 3.5 10%12%11%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Texoma matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 0%12%6%
Match total goals = 1 20%0%11%
Match total goals = 2 20%38%28%
Match total goals = 3 20%25%22%
Match total goals = 4 20%0%11%
Match total goals = 5+ 20%25%22%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 20%12%17%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 40%62%50%
Match total goals = 4+ 40%25%33%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  31 00
Away wins  10 00
Home & Away wins  41 00
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  22 10
Away defeats  10 10
Home & Away defeats  32 20

A majority of Texoma's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (4 wins), while 1 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more.

A majority of Texoma's defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (4 defeats), while 3 of their defeats had a one-goal margin.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 62%
38%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.30
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)1.00
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 58%
42%
  % Goals conceded 58%
42%
  League average 54%
46%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 40 4  22%
Drawing at HT 33 6  33%
Losing at HT 35 8  44%
  Total 10818







Goal times


 flag Texoma
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 1
GA 5
16-30 GF 6
GA 4
31-45 GF 3
GA 6
46-60 GF 1
GA 7
61-75 GF 5
GA 2
76-90 GF 8
GA 7
1st Half GF 10
42%
GA 15
48%
2nd Half GF 14
58%
GA 16
52%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 57
 Avg. minute goals conceded 49


  Texoma
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 1
GA 2
16-30 GF 5
GA 3
31-45 GF 2
GA 2
46-60 GF 0
GA 5
61-75 GF 1
GA 0
76-90 GF 5
GA 6
1st Half GF 8
57%
GA 7
39%
2nd Half GF 6
43%
GA 11
61%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 50
  Avg. minute goals conceded 53


  Texoma
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 0
GA 3
16-30 GF 1
GA 1
31-45 GF 1
GA 4
46-60 GF 1
GA 2
61-75 GF 4
GA 2
76-90 GF 3
GA 1
1st Half GF 2
20%
GA 8
62%
2nd Half GF 8
80%
GA 5
38%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 66
  Avg. minute goals conceded 43








Texoma scores

FT at home
3-4 1 10%
1-3 1 10%
0-3 1 10%
3-2 1 10%
2-2 1 10%
0-2 1 10%
2-1 1 10%
0-1 1 10%
2-0 1 10%
1-0 1 10%
FT away
1-1 3 38%
3-3 1 12%
1-2 1 12%
4-1 1 12%
2-1 1 12%
0-0 1 12%
The Texoma score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-1 so far (3 times).
Half-time at home
0-1 3 30%
1-0 3 30%
2-2 1 10%
2-1 1 10%
1-1 1 10%
0-0 1 10%
Half-time away
1-0 3 38%
0-0 2 25%
2-1 1 12%
1-1 1 12%
2-0 1 12%





This season in the league
Texoma conceded at least one goal in 8 of their 10 home matches. Texoma have scored in 7 of their 8 away matches. Texoma have scored 33% of their goals after the 75th minute.


 flag

Charlotte Independence

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 10 4 4 2  
  Away 9 3 3 3  
  Total 19 7 7 5  
PPG (Home): 1.60
PPG (Away): 1.33
PPG (Total): 1.47

Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game1.47 0.88 -40.1%
AVG Goals For1.79 1.88 +5.0%
AVG Goals Against1.58 2.13 +34.8%



Charlotte I.'s progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
15 Mar Charlotte I. 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Anthony Sorenson (50)
Richmond K. - + - 0-0 stats
28 Mar Charlotte I. 0 - 0

Chattanooga RW - + + 0-0 stats
5 Apr Greenville 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   D. Castro (86)
Charlotte I. - - + 0-0 stats
11 Apr Charlotte I. 1 - 1

---------------------------------------
1-0   Luis Alvarez (83)

     1-1   Nazeem Bartman (88)
Forward Madison - - - 0-0 stats
20 Apr Charlotte I. 3 - 2

1-0   Christian Chaney (9)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Mason Tunbridge (48) pen.

2-1   Bachir Ndiaye (61)

3-1   Jon Bakero (73)

     3-2   Sebastián Vivas (88)
Tormenta + - - 1-0 stats
4 May Texoma 3 - 4

1-0   Philip Spengler (22)

2-0   Solomon Asanté (29)

     2-1   Christian Chaney (43)

---------------------------------------
     2-2   Clay Dimick (53)

     2-3   Alfredo Midence (55)

3-3   Philip Spengler (84)

     3-4   Luis Alvarez (90) pen.
Charlotte I. + - - 2-1 stats
10 May Westchester SC 2 - 3

1-0   Conor McGlynn (8)

2-0   J. Jr. (40) pen.

---------------------------------------
     2-1   Souaibou Marou (57)

     2-2   Souaibou Marou (73)

     2-3   Souaibou Marou (89)
Charlotte I. + - - 2-0 stats
16 May Charlotte I. 3 - 1

1-0   Luis Alvarez (19)

     1-1   Jordan Skelton (37)

---------------------------------------
2-1   Christian Chaney (51)

3-1   Souaibou Marou (90)
One Knoxville + - - 1-1 stats
25 May Alta 2 - 1

     0-1   Souaibou Marou (23)

1-1   Alexis Cerritos (45)

---------------------------------------
2-1   Eduardo Blancas (82)
Charlotte I. + - - 1-1 stats
7 Jun Tormenta 0 - 2

     0-1   Christian Chaney (5) pen.

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Fabrice Gael Ngah (90)
Charlotte I. - + - 0-1 stats
12 Jun Spokane V. 1 - 1

     0-1   Christian Chaney (20)

---------------------------------------
1-1   Luis Gil (53)
Charlotte I. - - - 0-1 stats
15 Jun Charlotte I. 1 - 0

1-0   Fabrice Gael Ngah (35)

Greenville - + - 1-0 stats
22 Jun Texoma 3 - 2

1-0   Philip Spengler (45)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Luke McCormick (66)

     2-1   Fabrice Gael Ngah (76)

     2-2   Christian Chaney (90) pen.

3-2   Solomon Asanté (90)
Charlotte I. + - - 1-0 stats
12 Jul Charlotte I. 1 - 2

     0-1   Ryan Becher (32)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Sergio Ors Navarro (65)

1-2   Souaibou Marou (90)
Union Omaha + - - 0-1 stats
17 Jul Forward Madison 1 - 1

1-0   Christopher Garcia (44)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Bachir Ndiaye (64)
Charlotte I. - - - 1-0 stats
19 Jul Charlotte I. 1 - 1

1-0   Fabrice Gael Ngah (10)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Nathan Messer (69)
Portland Hearts - - - 1-0 stats
30 Jul One Knoxville 2 - 2

1-0   Jordan Skelton (2)

     1-1   Bachir Ndiaye (24)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   J. Palacios (67)

2-2   Stavros Zarokostas (79)
Charlotte I. + - - 1-1 stats
2 Aug Charlotte I. 3 - 3

1-0   Souaibou Marou (14)

2-0   J. Palacios (31)

     2-1   Teddy Baker (39)

---------------------------------------
3-1   Fabrice Gael Ngah (60)

     3-2   Luke McCormick (72)

     3-3   Brandon McManus (83)
Texoma + - - 2-1 stats
9 Aug Charlotte I. 4 - 5

     0-1   Chevone Marsh (22)

1-1   Christian Chaney (28) pen.

2-1   Jon Bakero (30)

     2-2   Chevone Marsh (45)

---------------------------------------
     2-3   Chevone Marsh (50) pen.

3-3   Christian Chaney (54) pen.

4-3   Rafael Jauregui (59)

     4-4   Pascal Corvino (68)

     4-5   Ben Zakowski (90)
Greenville + - - 2-2 stats



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
15 Aug Charlotte I. h2h Westchester SC 1.60 1.00
21 Aug Union Omaha h2h Charlotte I. 1.33 1.33
30 Aug Portland Hearts h2h Charlotte I. 1.71 1.33
6 Sep Chattanooga RW h2h Charlotte I. 2.33 1.33
12 Sep Charlotte I. h2h Naples 1.60 1.22
20 Sep Richmond K. h2h Charlotte I. 0.89 1.33
26 Sep One Knoxville h2h Charlotte I. 2.00 1.33
3 Oct Charlotte I. h2h Spokane V. 1.60 1.86
10 Oct Charlotte I. h2h Alta 1.60 1.00
17 Oct Charlotte I. h2h Chattanooga RW 1.60 1.44
25 Oct Naples h2h Charlotte I. 2.10 1.33
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.53

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins ---
Consecutive draws -2-
Consecutive defeats 1-1
No win 447
No draw 1-1
No defeat -2-
1 goal scored or more 8816
1 goal conceded or more 447
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded ---
GF+GA over 2.5 213
GF+GA under 2.5 ---
Scored at least twice 213










Comparison with league average


Charlotte I. (19 matches) vs league average

(overall)Charlotte I. League AVG
Points per game  1.47 1.33
% Wins  37% 33%
% Draws  37% 34%
% Defeats  26% 33%
Goals scored per game  1.79 1.41
Goals conceded per game  1.58 1.41
% Clean sheets  21% 21%
% Failed To Score  11% 21%
% Won To Nil  16% 14%
% Lost To Nil  5% 14%
% Team scored first  53% 46%
% Opponent scored first  42% 46%
Average minute scored first  27 27
Average minute conceded first  33 27
Lead-defending rate  39% 48%
Equalizing rate  58% 52%
% Time leading  33% 25%
% Time level in goals  52% 50%
% Time trailing  15% 25%
PPG when scored first  1.90 1.90
PPG when conceded first  1.00 0.81
Total goals per game  3.37 2.82
% over 1.5 goals  79% 78%
% over 2.5 goals  53% 55%
% over 3.5 goals  42% 31%
% both teams scored  74% 65%

Charlotte I. at home (10 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Charlotte I. League AVG
Points per game  1.60 1.56
% Wins  40% 41%
% Draws  40% 34%
% Defeats  20% 26%
Goals scored per game  1.80 1.53
Goals conceded per game  1.50 1.29
% Clean sheets  30% 24%
% Failed To Score  10% 18%
% Won To Nil  20% 17%
% Lost To Nil  0% 11%
% Team scored first  70% 54%
% Opponent scored first  20% 38%
Average minute scored first  31 28
Average minute conceded first  27 26
Lead-defending rate  36% 50%
Equalizing rate  50% 54%
% Time leading  42% 31%
% Time level in goals  51% 50%
% Time trailing  8% 20%
PPG when scored first  2.14 2.00
PPG when conceded first  0.00 1.00
Total goals per game  3.30 2.82
% over 1.5 goals  70% 78%
% over 2.5 goals  50% 55%
% over 3.5 goals  40% 31%
% both teams scored  70% 65%

Charlotte I. away (9 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Charlotte I. League AVG
Points per game  1.33 1.10
% Wins  33% 26%
% Draws  33% 34%
% Defeats  33% 41%
Goals scored per game  1.78 1.29
Goals conceded per game  1.67 1.53
% Clean sheets  11% 18%
% Failed To Score  11% 24%
% Won To Nil  11% 11%
% Lost To Nil  11% 17%
% Team scored first  33% 38%
% Opponent scored first  67% 54%
Average minute scored first  16 26
Average minute conceded first  34 28
Lead-defending rate  43% 46%
Equalizing rate  62% 50%
% Time leading  22% 20%
% Time level in goals  53% 50%
% Time trailing  24% 31%
PPG when scored first  1.33 1.77
PPG when conceded first  1.33 0.68
Total goals per game  3.44 2.82
% over 1.5 goals  89% 78%
% over 2.5 goals  56% 55%
% over 3.5 goals  44% 31%
% both teams scored  78% 65%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Charlotte I.
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 10 / 19 53%
  Opponent scored first 8 / 19 42%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 6 / 19 32%
  Opponent was leading at HT 5 / 19 26%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 29.4 min. 33%
  Average minutes level in goals 46.7 min. 52%
  Average minutes trailing 13.8 min. 15%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Charlotte Independence have been in the lead for an average duration of 29.4 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 13.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Charlotte I.
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 19

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 18
  Equalizer goals conceded 11
  Lead defending rate * (1) 39%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 12
  Equalizer goals scored 7
  Equalizing rate * (2) 58%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 9
  Non-crucial goals conceded 7

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Charlotte Independence have taken the lead 18 times and have conceded an equalizer on 11 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 39% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 61%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 12 times that Charlotte I.'s opponents have taken the lead, Charlotte I. have managed to score an equalizer on 7 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 58%.


 flag Charlotte I.
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 7 / 10 70%
  Opponent scored first 2 / 10 20%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 4 / 10 40%
  Opponent was leading at HT 1 / 10 10%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 37.7 min. 42%
  Average minutes level in goals 45.5 min. 51%
  Average minutes trailing 6.8 min. 8%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Charlotte I. have been in the lead for an average duration of 37.7 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 6.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Charlotte I.
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 10

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 11
  Equalizer goals conceded 7
  Lead defending rate * (1) 36%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 4
  Equalizer goals scored 2
  Equalizing rate * (2) 50%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 5
  Non-crucial goals conceded 4

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Charlotte I. have taken the lead 11 times and have conceded an equalizer on 7 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 36% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 64%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 4 times that Charlotte I.'s opponents have taken the lead when Charlotte I. were playing at home, Charlotte I. have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 50%.



 flag Charlotte I.
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 3 / 9 33%
  Opponent scored first 6 / 9 67%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 2 / 9 22%
  Opponent was leading at HT 4 / 9 44%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 20.2 min. 22%
  Average minutes level in goals 48.1 min. 53%
  Average minutes trailing 21.7 min. 24%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Charlotte I. have been in the lead for an average duration of 20.2 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 21.7 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Charlotte I.
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 9

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 7
  Equalizer goals conceded 4
  Lead defending rate * (1) 43%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 8
  Equalizer goals scored 5
  Equalizing rate * (2) 62%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 4
  Non-crucial goals conceded 3

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Charlotte I. have taken the lead 7 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 43% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 57%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 8 times that Charlotte I.'s opponents have taken the lead when Charlotte I. were playing away, Charlotte I. have managed to score an equalizer on 5 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 62%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Spokane V. 18 35   1 - 1 h2h
   
2 Chattanooga RW 18 34 0 - 0   h2h
   
3 Naples 19 32     h2h
   
4 One Knoxville 16 28 3 - 1 2 - 2 h2h
   
5 Charlotte I. 19 28
6 Alta 18 27   2 - 1 h2h
   
7 Greenville 19 23 1 - 0 1 - 0 h2h
4 - 5  
8 Portland Hearts 17 21 1 - 1   h2h
   
9 Texoma 18 21 3 - 3 3 - 4 h2h
  3 - 2
10 Forward Madison 18 18 1 - 1 1 - 1 h2h
   
11 Union Omaha 17 18 1 - 2   h2h
   
12 Richmond K. 18 17 1 - 0   h2h
   
13 Tormenta 18 16 3 - 2 0 - 2 h2h
   
14 Westchester SC 17 15   2 - 3 h2h
   








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 18 1634
GF per match 1.801.78 1.79
Goals conceded (GA) 151530
GA per match 1.501.67 1.58
GF + GA per match 3.303.443.37
GF+GA over 0.5 90%100%95%
GF+GA over 1.5 70%89%79%
GF+GA over 2.5 50%56%53%
GF+GA over 3.5 40%44%42%
GF+GA over 4.5 30%33%32%
GF+GA over 5.5 20%11%16%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 70%89%79%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 30%44%37%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 20%11%16%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 30%11%21%
Won-to-nil 20%11%16%
Failed to score 10%11%11%
Lost-to-nil 0%11%5%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 90%89%89%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 60%56%58%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 70%67%68%
Scored in both halves 40%33%37%
Both teams scored 70%78%74%
Conceding Rate 70%89%79%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 40%67%53%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 60%67%63%
Conceded in both halves 30%44%37%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 90%89%89%
GF over 1.5 40%56%47%
GF over 2.5 40%22%32%
GF over 3.5 10%11%11%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 70%89%79%
GA over 1.5 40%56%47%
GA over 2.5 20%22%21%
GA over 3.5 10%0%5%
GA over 4.5 10%0%5%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Charlotte I. matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 10%0%5%
Match total goals = 1 20%11%16%
Match total goals = 2 20%33%26%
Match total goals = 3 10%11%11%
Match total goals = 4 10%11%11%
Match total goals = 5+ 30%33%32%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 30%11%21%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 30%44%37%
Match total goals = 4+ 40%44%42%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  31 00
Away wins  21 00
Home & Away wins  52 00
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  20 00
Away defeats  30 00
Home & Away defeats  50 00

A majority of Charlotte I.'s wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (5 wins), while 2 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more.

A majority of Charlotte I.'s defeats had a one-goal margin (5 defeats), while 0 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 57%
43%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.60
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)1.33
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 53%
47%
  % Goals conceded 50%
50%
  League average 54%
46%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 42 6  32%
Drawing at HT 53 8  42%
Losing at HT 14 5  26%
  Total 10919







Goal times


 flag Charlotte I.
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 4
GA 2
16-30 GF 6
GA 3
31-45 GF 3
GA 8
46-60 GF 8
GA 3
61-75 GF 5
GA 5
76-90 GF 8
GA 9
1st Half GF 13
38%
GA 13
43%
2nd Half GF 21
62%
GA 17
57%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 52
 Avg. minute goals conceded 56


  Charlotte I.
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 3
GA 0
16-30 GF 3
GA 1
31-45 GF 2
GA 4
46-60 GF 5
GA 2
61-75 GF 2
GA 4
76-90 GF 3
GA 4
1st Half GF 8
44%
GA 5
33%
2nd Half GF 10
56%
GA 10
67%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 47
  Avg. minute goals conceded 60


  Charlotte I.
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 1
GA 2
16-30 GF 3
GA 2
31-45 GF 1
GA 4
46-60 GF 3
GA 1
61-75 GF 3
GA 1
76-90 GF 5
GA 5
1st Half GF 5
31%
GA 8
53%
2nd Half GF 11
69%
GA 7
47%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 57
  Avg. minute goals conceded 52








Charlotte I. scores

FT at home
1-1 2 20%
1-0 2 20%
4-5 1 10%
3-3 1 10%
3-2 1 10%
1-2 1 10%
3-1 1 10%
0-0 1 10%
FT away
1-1 2 22%
3-4 1 11%
2-3 1 11%
3-2 1 11%
2-2 1 11%
0-2 1 11%
2-1 1 11%
1-0 1 11%
The Charlotte I. score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-1 so far (2 times).
Half-time at home
1-0 3 30%
0-0 3 30%
2-2 1 10%
2-1 1 10%
1-1 1 10%
0-1 1 10%
Half-time away
1-1 2 22%
0-1 2 22%
1-0 2 22%
2-1 1 11%
2-0 1 11%
0-0 1 11%





This season in the league
Charlotte I. have failed to win in their last 7 matches. Charlotte I. have scored in each of their last 16 matches. Charlotte I. failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 7 matches. Charlotte I. have scored in 8 of their 9 away matches. Charlotte I. have scored in each of their last 8 away matches. Charlotte I. have scored 2 goals or more in each of their last 3 matches.








Tables overview

Points

GP pts
Spokane V. 18 35
Chattanooga . 18 34
Naples 19 32
One Knoxville 16 28
Charlotte I. 19 28
Alta 18 27
Greenville 19 23
Portland Hea. 17 21
Texoma 18 21
Forward Madi. 18 18
Union Omaha 17 18
Richmond K. 18 17
Tormenta 18 16
Westchester . 17 15

Form (last 8)

GP pts
Chattanooga . 8 17
One Knoxville 8 15
Naples 8 14
Spokane V. 8 14
Greenville 8 13
Alta 8 12
Texoma 8 10
Portland Hea. 8 10
Forward Madi. 8 9
Tormenta 8 8
Charlotte I. 8 7
Union Omaha 8 7
Westchester . 8 7
Richmond K. 8 5

Home

GP pts
Spokane V. 11 22
Chattanooga . 9 21
Naples 10 21
Alta 10 19
Charlotte I. 10 16
Greenville 9 15
Texoma 10 13
One Knoxville 6 12
Portland Hea. 7 12
Forward Madi. 10 12
Tormenta 10 10
Union Omaha 6 8
Richmond K. 9 8
Westchester . 8 6

Away

GP pts
One Knoxville 10 16
Chattanooga . 9 13
Spokane V. 7 13
Charlotte I. 9 12
Naples 9 11
Union Omaha 11 10
Richmond K. 9 9
Portland Hea. 10 9
Westchester . 9 9
Alta 8 8
Texoma 8 8
Greenville 10 8
Tormenta 8 6
Forward Madi. 8 6

Offence

GP GF
Charlotte I. 19 34
Chattanooga . 18 30
Greenville 19 28
Naples 19 28
Alta 18 27
Spokane V. 18 26
Westchester . 17 26
Richmond K. 18 25
One Knoxville 16 24
Texoma 18 24
Tormenta 18 23
Union Omaha 17 22
Portland Hea. 17 18
Forward Madi. 18 17

Defence

GP GA
Spokane V. 18 16
One Knoxville 16 16
Portland Hea. 17 17
Chattanooga . 18 19
Forward Madi. 18 21
Naples 19 23
Alta 18 23
Union Omaha 17 29
Greenville 19 29
Richmond K. 18 30
Charlotte I. 19 30
Texoma 18 31
Tormenta 18 33
Westchester . 17 35






Total Match Goals stats


Total match goals stats

Matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Westchester SC  17 3.59 100% 100% 71% 41% 18% 12% 82% 6% 12% 6% 12%
Charlotte I.  19 3.37 95% 79% 53% 42% 32% 16% 74% 21% 11% 16% 5%
Tormenta  18 3.11 100% 89% 72% 33% 11% 6% 72% 6% 22% 6% 22%
Richmond K.  18 3.06 89% 67% 56% 33% 22% 22% 56% 17% 39% 6% 28%
Texoma  18 3.06 94% 83% 56% 33% 22% 11% 67% 17% 22% 11% 17%
Greenville  19 3.00 100% 68% 53% 42% 11% 11% 47% 21% 32% 21% 32%
Union Omaha  17 3.00 94% 76% 76% 35% 6% 6% 71% 18% 18% 12% 12%
Alta  18 2.78 83% 83% 50% 33% 17% 6% 61% 28% 28% 11% 11%
Chattanooga RW  18 2.72 89% 78% 61% 39% 6% 0% 67% 33% 11% 22% 0%
Naples  19 2.68 95% 84% 63% 21% 5% 0% 74% 21% 11% 16% 5%
One Knoxville  16 2.50 100% 75% 44% 31% 0% 0% 62% 31% 6% 31% 6%
Spokane V.  18 2.33 89% 67% 50% 22% 6% 0% 44% 39% 28% 28% 17%
Forward Madison  18 2.11 89% 78% 33% 11% 0% 0% 67% 17% 28% 6% 17%
Portland Hearts  17 2.06 82% 71% 35% 18% 0% 0% 65% 24% 29% 6% 12%
League average 92.8% 78.4% 55.2% 31.2% 11.2% 6.4% 64.8% 21.2% 21.2% 14.0% 14.0%

Total match goals stats (last 8 matches)

Last 8 matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Charlotte I.  8 4.00 100% 88% 62% 50% 38% 25% 88% 12% 0% 12% 0%
Greenville  8 3.88 100% 88% 75% 62% 12% 12% 62% 25% 12% 25% 12%
Union Omaha  8 3.75 100% 100% 100% 38% 12% 12% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Westchester SC  8 3.50 100% 100% 88% 25% 12% 12% 75% 12% 12% 12% 12%
Naples  8 3.25 100% 100% 88% 25% 12% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Texoma  8 3.13 100% 88% 50% 38% 25% 12% 75% 12% 12% 12% 12%
Chattanooga RW  8 2.88 100% 88% 62% 38% 0% 0% 62% 38% 0% 38% 0%
One Knoxville  8 2.75 100% 75% 62% 38% 0% 0% 62% 25% 12% 25% 12%
Richmond K.  8 2.75 88% 75% 50% 25% 12% 12% 50% 12% 50% 0% 38%
Tormenta  8 2.75 100% 88% 75% 12% 0% 0% 75% 0% 25% 0% 25%
Alta  8 2.50 88% 88% 38% 25% 12% 0% 62% 25% 25% 12% 12%
Forward Madison  8 2.38 88% 75% 50% 25% 0% 0% 62% 25% 25% 12% 12%
Spokane V.  8 2.38 100% 88% 50% 0% 0% 0% 50% 25% 25% 25% 25%
Portland Hearts  8 1.75 88% 62% 12% 12% 0% 0% 50% 25% 38% 12% 25%
League average 96.4% 85.7% 61.6% 29.5% 9.8% 6.3% 69.6% 17.0% 17.0% 13.4% 13.4%

Total match goals stats (at home)

Home matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Westchester SC  8 3.75 100% 100% 75% 50% 25% 12% 75% 12% 12% 12% 12%
Union Omaha  6 3.67 100% 83% 83% 50% 17% 17% 83% 17% 0% 17% 0%
Richmond K.  9 3.44 100% 78% 67% 33% 22% 22% 67% 11% 22% 11% 22%
Charlotte I.  10 3.30 90% 70% 50% 40% 30% 20% 70% 30% 10% 20% 0%
Texoma  10 3.20 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 10% 50% 20% 30% 20% 30%
Tormenta  10 3.10 100% 90% 70% 30% 10% 10% 70% 10% 20% 10% 20%
One Knoxville  6 2.67 100% 83% 50% 33% 0% 0% 67% 33% 0% 33% 0%
Greenville  9 2.56 100% 78% 44% 33% 0% 0% 44% 33% 22% 33% 22%
Alta  10 2.50 80% 80% 50% 20% 20% 0% 70% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Naples  10 2.50 90% 80% 60% 20% 0% 0% 70% 20% 20% 10% 10%
Spokane V.  11 2.45 91% 73% 45% 27% 9% 0% 64% 27% 18% 18% 9%
Portland Hearts  7 2.43 86% 86% 43% 29% 0% 0% 71% 14% 29% 0% 14%
Chattanooga RW  9 2.33 89% 67% 56% 22% 0% 0% 56% 44% 11% 33% 0%
Forward Madison  10 1.90 80% 60% 30% 20% 0% 0% 60% 30% 30% 10% 10%
League average 92.8% 78.4% 55.2% 31.2% 11.2% 6.4% 64.8% 24.0% 18.4% 16.8% 11.2%

Total match goals stats (away)

Away matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Charlotte I.  9 3.44 100% 89% 56% 44% 33% 11% 78% 11% 11% 11% 11%
Westchester SC  9 3.44 100% 100% 67% 33% 11% 11% 89% 0% 11% 0% 11%
Greenville  10 3.40 100% 60% 60% 50% 20% 20% 50% 10% 40% 10% 40%
Alta  8 3.13 88% 88% 50% 50% 12% 12% 50% 25% 38% 12% 25%
Tormenta  8 3.13 100% 88% 75% 38% 12% 0% 75% 0% 25% 0% 25%
Chattanooga RW  9 3.11 89% 89% 67% 56% 11% 0% 78% 22% 11% 11% 0%
Naples  9 2.89 100% 89% 67% 22% 11% 0% 78% 22% 0% 22% 0%
Texoma  8 2.88 88% 88% 50% 25% 25% 12% 88% 12% 12% 0% 0%
Richmond K.  9 2.67 78% 56% 44% 33% 22% 22% 44% 22% 56% 0% 33%
Union Omaha  11 2.64 91% 73% 73% 27% 0% 0% 64% 18% 27% 9% 18%
One Knoxville  10 2.40 100% 70% 40% 30% 0% 0% 60% 30% 10% 30% 10%
Forward Madison  8 2.38 100% 100% 38% 0% 0% 0% 75% 0% 25% 0% 25%
Spokane V.  7 2.14 86% 57% 57% 14% 0% 0% 14% 57% 43% 43% 29%
Portland Hearts  10 1.80 80% 60% 30% 10% 0% 0% 60% 30% 30% 10% 10%
League average 92.8% 78.4% 55.2% 31.2% 11.2% 6.4% 64.8% 18.4% 24.0% 11.2% 16.8%




Segments Table

0 pt Segments table progression arrow 35 pts
5th Segment 4th Segment 3rd Segment 2nd Segment 1st Segment
up to 6.6 pts from 6.7 to 13.7 pts from 13.8 to 20.8 pts from 20.9 to 27.9 pts from 28.0 to 35 pts
(18)  18  Forward Madison
(17)  18  Union Omaha
(18)  17  Richmond K.
(18)  16  Tormenta
(17)  15  Westchester SC
(18)  27  Alta
(19)  23  Greenville
(17)  21  Portland Hearts
(18)  21  Texoma
(18)  35  Spokane V.
(18)  34  Chattanooga RW
(19)  32  Naples
(16)  28  One Knoxville
(19)  28  Charlotte I.

The Segments Table is a visual representation splitting the teams into 5 segments. Each team is assigned to a specific segment, depending on the team's number of points. Each of the 5 segments spans one-fifth (20%) of the total points held by the team ranked 1st in the league. For each team, the number of matches played appears in green between brackets, and the number of points is displayed in black.








Mon 11 Aug
WES - TOR
Sat 16 Aug
CHL - WES
Sun 17 Aug
ONE - UNI
Sun 17 Aug
RIC - TOR
Sun 17 Aug
FMA - NAP
Sun 17 Aug
TEX - CHG
Sun 17 Aug
ALT - GRE
Sun 17 Aug
POR - SPO




League statistics

125 matches played / 210
59.5% completed
Home wins:  41%
Over 1.5 goals:  78%
Draws:  34%
Over 2.5 goals:  55%
Away wins:  26%
Over 3.5 goals:  31%
Goals:  352 Home goals per match:  1.53
Goals per match:  2.82 Away goals per match:  1.29
    Both teams scored:  65%

Results

 Latest results
 Matches by date
 Matches by Matchweek
 Results grid
 Results filter
 Outcome Surprise-Levels

Tables

 Home / Away tables
 Wide table
 Tables by Date
 Form tables
 Projected points

Analysis

 Goals statistics
 Points performance
 Over / Under
 Scored / Conceded
 Home advantage
 Relative form
 Run-in analysis

Goal times

 When goals were scored
 1st-half / 2nd-half
 First team to score
 Goal types
 Lead durations
 Points Won/Lost
Home team scored first: 54% No goal scored: 8% Away team scored first: 38%
Average minute when home team scored first: 28 min. Average minute when away team scored first: 26 min.
Home team lead-defending rate: 50% Away team lead-defending rate: 46%
Home team equalizing rate: 54% Away team equalizing rate: 50%
Home team lead duration: 31% Teams level in goals: 50% Away team lead duration: 20%
Home PPG when home team scored first: 2.00 Away PPG when away team scored first: 1.77

More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 125 matches played in the league, a total of 352 goals have been scored (2.82 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including the league results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded.

 

SoccerSTATS.com - Public edition

SoccerSTATS.com provides football statistics, results and blog articles on national and international soccer competitions worldwide. Football fans can keep a tab on stats related to their favourite team or leagues of interest, and access a wide range of team performance data analytics and league standings, not only on the world's most famous professional leagues, but also on amateur and regional leagues over the world. Example of soccer statistics include league standings, form tables, top goal scorers, scoring stats, statistical previews and goal timing statistics.
Follow us on Twitter
F.A.Q. Contact Privacy Policy Change consent
Terms & conditions of use About us Cookie usage and options
Mobile app

Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. Products, services, promotional offers and other offerings from partners and advertisers are subject to terms and conditions. By using this website you certify that you agree with the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy and that you are over the age of 18 or that you have the permission of a parent or guardian to use this website, after your parent or guardian has carefully reviewed and agreed to the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy. The website's content is provided for informational purposes only is not to be relied upon as a professional opinion whatsover. Nothing on this website should be considered as advice. This website is not associated with nor endorsed by any league or competition (whether professional, collegiate or other types of leagues / competitions), federation, association, club or team. All trademarks, brands, images, logos and names appearing on this website belong to their respective owners.
Useful links (third-party websites):   www.gamcare.org.uk       www.begambleaware.org        gamblingtherapy.org
   
Copyright 1998-2025 SoccerSTATS.com
back to top