| Home | Away | Total | |
| Played | 9 | 11 | 20 |
| Points Per Game | 2.33 | 1.18 | 1.70 |
| Select Favourite Stats | |||
| View Favourite Stats for all teams | |||
 |
Portland Thorns W |
(this season in the league) |
Portland T. W's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 14 Mar | Washington S. W |
0:1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Olivia Lynn Moultrie (52) |
Portland T. W | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| 21 Mar | Portland T. W |
2:0
1-0 Pietra Adao Tordin (28) 2-0 Reilyn Sky Turner (37) |
Seattle Reign W | - | + | - | 2-0 |
|
| 26 Mar | San Diego W. W |
3:1
1-0 M. Silva (2) 1-1 Pietra Adao Tordin (8) 2-1 Lia Eugenia Godfrey (27) --------------------------------------- 3-1 M. Barcenas (82) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 2-1 |
|
| 28 Mar | Portland T. W |
2:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Olivia Lynn Moultrie (53) pen. 2-0 Reilyn Sky Turner (63) |
KC Current W | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| 4 Apr | N. Carolina W |
2:2
0-1 Reilyn Sky Turner (12) 1-1 Manaka Matsukubo (28) 1-2 Olivia Lynn Moultrie (33) 2-2 A. Sanchez (37) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 2-2 |
|
| 26 Apr | Angel City W |
1:2
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Pietra Adao Tordin (76) 0-2 Sophia Olivia Wilson (90) 1-2 Prisca Chilufya (90) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 30 Apr | Portland T. W |
2:0
1-0 Marie Lena Mller (10) --------------------------------------- 2-0 Sophia Olivia Wilson (64) |
San Diego W. W | - | + | - | 1-0 |
|
| 3 May | Chicago RS W |
0:2
0-1 Olivia Lynn Moultrie (17) --------------------------------------- 0-2 Reilyn Sky Turner (89) |
Portland T. W | - | + | - | 0-1 |
|
| 8 May | R. Louisville W |
3:1
0-1 Sophia Olivia Wilson (6) 1-1 Katie OKane (14) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Katie OKane (76) 3-1 Emma C. Sears (90) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 17 May | Portland T. W |
0:0
|
Angel City W | - | + | + | 0-0 |
|
| 21 May | Portland T. W |
2:0
1-0 Mary Alice Vignola (30) --------------------------------------- 2-0 M. McKenzie (77) |
Bay FC W | - | + | - | 1-0 |
|
| 24 May | KC Current W |
3:1
0-1 Sophia Olivia Wilson (14) 1-1 N.A (41) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Temwa Chawinga (63) 3-1 H. Hopkins (90) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 30 May | Portland T. W |
2:2
1-0 Olivia Lynn Moultrie (21) 1-1 K. Hernndez (44) --------------------------------------- 1-2 C. Lacasse (50) 2-2 Sophia Olivia Wilson (90) pen. |
Utah Royals W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 5 Jul | Portland T. W |
4:0
1-0 Jayden Lee Perry (13) 2-0 Pietra Adao Tordin (36) 3-0 Reilyn Sky Turner (41) --------------------------------------- 4-0 Sophia Olivia Wilson (82) |
R. Louisville W | + | + | - | 3-0 |
|
| 12 Jul | Seattle Reign W |
2:0
1-0 Ryanne Brown (8) 2-0 Madison Mercado (43) |
Portland T. W | - | - | + | 2-0 |
|
| 18 Jul | Denver Summit W |
2:1
0-1 Sophia Olivia Wilson (25) pen. 1-1 J. Sonis (45) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Natalie Means (86) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 25 Jul | Portland T. W |
2:2
0-1 M. Williams-Purce (2) 1-1 Renee Lyles (21) --------------------------------------- 2-1 J. Fleming (53) 2-2 Samantha May Kerr (62) |
Gotham FC W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 2 Aug | Utah Royals W |
5:1
0-1 Sophia Olivia Wilson (1) 1-1 Cecelia Anne Delzer (35) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Cecelia Anne Delzer (47) 3-1 Brecken Inga Mozingo (68) 4-1 K. Hernndez (79) 5-1 K. Fava (89) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 9 Aug | Boston Legacy W |
3:4
0-1 Pietra Adao Tordin (2) 0-2 Sophia Olivia Wilson (6) 0-3 Pietra Adao Tordin (10) 1-3 B. St-Georges (31) 1-4 Pietra Adao Tordin (37) 2-4 Alba Cao Isant (42) --------------------------------------- 3-4 A. Santos (82) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 2-4 |
|
| 16 Aug | Portland T. W |
2:1
--------------------------------------- 1-0 D. Naujenis (58) 1-1 L. Muoz (63) 2-1 Caiya Hanks (90) |
Orlando Pride W | + | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| Filter Portland Thorns W results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 23 Aug | Portland T. W vs Denver Summit W | 2.33 | 1.20 | |||
| 29 Aug | Gotham FC W vs Portland T. W | 2.18 | 1.18 | |||
| 6 Sep | Portland T. W vs Washington S. W | 2.33 | 1.91 | |||
| 13 Sep | Portland T. W vs Chicago RS W | 2.33 | 0.30 | |||
| 19 Sep | Orlando Pride W vs Portland T. W | 1.60 | 1.18 | |||
| 27 Sep | Portland T. W vs Houston Dash W | 2.33 | 0.89 | |||
| 4 Oct | Portland T. W vs Boston Legacy W | 2.33 | 0.75 | |||
| 18 Oct | Bay FC W vs Portland T. W | 0.89 | 1.18 | |||
| 24 Oct | Portland T. W vs N. Carolina W | 2.33 | 1.89 | |||
| 1 Nov | Houston Dash W vs Portland T. W | 1.50 | 1.18 | |||
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.31 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
Run-in overview | ||||||
|
Of their 10 remaining matches in the league, Portland T. W will be playing more matches at home (6) than away (4).
Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, Portland T. W's remaining away matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining home matches.
Portland T. W's opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 1.16 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that Portland Thorns W will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 1.54 Points Per Game at home in the league. | ||||||
| View opponents PPG values for all teams | ||||||
| Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
Portland T. W (20 matches) vs league average
Portland T. W at home (9 matches) vs league average at home
Portland T. W away (11 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Portland Thorns W goals statistics indicate an average of 1.70 goals scored per game so far this season, which is higher than the average number of 1.35 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in the league. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Portland T. W | |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 16 / 20 | 80% | |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 20 | 15% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 6 / 20 | 30% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 2 / 20 | 10% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 33.8 min. | 38% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 41.4 min. | 46% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 14.9 min. | 17% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Portland Thorns W have been in the lead for an average duration of 33.8 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 14.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Portland T. W | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 20 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 19 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 9 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 53% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 9 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 3 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 33% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 12 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 11 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
Portland Thorns W have taken the lead 19 times and have conceded an equalizer on 9 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 53% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 47%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 9 times that Portland T. W's opponents have taken the lead, Portland T. W have managed to score an equalizer on 3 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 33%.
|
Portland T. W | |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 7 / 9 | 78% | |
| Opponent scored first | 1 / 9 | 11% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 4 / 9 | 44% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 0 / 9 | 0% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 39.2 min. | 44% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 44.2 min. | 49% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 6.6 min. | 7% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Portland T. W have been in the lead for an average duration of 39.2 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 6.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Portland T. W | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 9 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 9 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 3 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 67% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 2 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 2 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 100% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 7 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 0 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Portland T. W have taken the lead 9 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 67% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 33%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 2 times that Portland T. W's opponents have taken the lead when Portland T. W were playing at home, Portland T. W have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 100%.
|
Portland T. W | |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 9 / 11 | 82% | |
| Opponent scored first | 2 / 11 | 18% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 2 / 11 | 18% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 2 / 11 | 18% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 29.3 min. | 33% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 39.0 min. | 43% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 21.7 min. | 24% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Portland T. W have been in the lead for an average duration of 29.3 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 21.7 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Portland T. W | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 11 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 10 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 6 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 40% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 7 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 1 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 14% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 5 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 11 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Portland T. W have taken the lead 10 times and have conceded an equalizer on 6 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 40% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 60%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 7 times that Portland T. W's opponents have taken the lead when Portland T. W were playing away, Portland T. W have managed to score an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away equalizing rate of 14%.
Results table
Portland T. W stats rank the team in 4th position in the the league table with 34 points, 2 points behind Utah Royals W and 1 point above San Diego W. W. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 18 | 16 | 34 |
| GF per match | 2.00 | 1.45 | 1.70 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 5 | 24 | 29 |
| GA per match | 0.56 | 2.18 | 1.45 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.56 | 3.64 | 3.15 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 89% | 100% | 95% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 89% | 91% | 90% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 44% | 73% | 60% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 33% | 55% | 45% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 0% | 18% | 10% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 18% | 10% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 67% | 82% | 75% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 44% | 73% | 60% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 11% | 27% | 20% |
| Portland Thorns W over 2.5 stats indicate a 60% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is higher than the league average value of 54% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in the league. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 67% | 18% | 40% |
| Won-to-nil | 56% | 18% | 35% |
| Failed to score | 11% | 9% | 10% |
| Lost-to-nil | 0% | 9% | 5% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 89% | 91% | 90% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 67% | 73% | 70% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 78% | 27% | 50% |
| Scored in both halves | 56% | 9% | 30% |
| Both teams scored | 33% | 73% | 55% |
| Conceding Rate | 33% | 82% | 60% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 22% | 73% | 50% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 33% | 64% | 50% |
| Conceded in both halves | 22% | 55% | 40% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 89% | 91% | 90% |
| GF over 1.5 | 89% | 36% | 60% |
| GF over 2.5 | 11% | 9% | 10% |
| GF over 3.5 | 11% | 9% | 10% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 33% | 82% | 60% |
| GA over 1.5 | 22% | 73% | 50% |
| GA over 2.5 | 0% | 45% | 25% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 9% | 5% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 9% | 5% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Portland T. W matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 11% | 0% | 5% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 0% | 9% | 5% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 44% | 18% | 30% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 11% | 18% | 15% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 33% | 36% | 35% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 0% | 18% | 10% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 11% | 9% | 10% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 56% | 36% | 45% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 33% | 55% | 45% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Away wins | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Home & Away defeats | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
|
A majority of Portland T. W's wins have been obtained with a margin of 2 goals or more (6 wins), while 4 of their wins had a one-goal margin. A majority of Portland T. W's defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (5 defeats), while 1 of their defeats had a one-goal margin. |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 62% | 38% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | |
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 2.33 |
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.18 |
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | +1.15 |
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 53% | 47% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 17% | 83% | ||
| League average | 56% | 44% | ||
|
Matches played at home have accounted for 62% of Portland T. W's total points and 53% of the goals they have scored so far this season in the league. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 4 | 2 | 6 | 30% |
| Drawing at HT | 5 | 7 | 12 | 60% |
| Losing at HT | 0 | 2 | 2 | 10% |
| Total | 9 | 11 | 20 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
Portland T. W |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 10 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 21 | 62% | |
| GA | 14 | 48% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 13 | 38% | |
| GA | 15 | 52% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 40 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 52 |
|
Portland T. W |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 9 | 50% | |
| GA | 2 | 40% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 9 | 50% | |
| GA | 3 | 60% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 48 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 44 |
|
Portland T. W |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 12 | 75% | |
| GA | 12 | 50% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 4 | 25% | |
| GA | 12 | 50% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 30 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 54 |
Portland T. W scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Portland T. W score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 2-0 so far (4 times).
The Portland T. W score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 3-1 so far (3 times).
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| This season in the league |
|
Portland T. W have won their last 2 matches. Portland T. W failed to keep a clean sheet in 9 of their 11 away matches. Portland T. W have scored in 10 of their 11 away matches. 83% of Portland T. W's conceded goals were conceded away. Portland T. W have scored 62% of their goals in the first half. Portland T. W have scored the opening goal in 16 of their 20 matches. Portland T. W have been undefeated in their last 9 home matches. Portland T. W failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 6 away matches. Portland T. W have scored a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 5 home matches. Portland T. W have conceded a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 6 away matches. Portland T. W have scored 29% of their goals in the first 15 minutes. View comments for all teams |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsMatch total goals stats
Match total goals statsMatch total goals stats (last 8 matches)
Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)Match total goals stats (at home)
Match total goals stats (at home)Match total goals stats (away)
Match total goals stats (away)Example
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
