| Home | Away | Total | |
| Played | 15 | 14 | 29 |
| Points Per Game | 1.93 | 1.29 | 1.62 |
| Select Favourite Stats | |||
| View Favourite Stats for all teams | |||
 |
Portland Thorns W |
(this season in the league) |
Portland T. W's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 14 Mar | Washington S. W |
0:1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Olivia Lynn Moultrie (52) |
Portland T. W | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| 21 Mar | Portland T. W |
2:0
1-0 Pietra Adao Tordin (28) 2-0 Reilyn Sky Turner (37) |
Seattle Reign W | - | + | - | 2-0 |
|
| 26 Mar | San Diego W. W |
3:1
1-0 M. Silva (2) 1-1 Pietra Adao Tordin (8) 2-1 Lia Eugenia Godfrey (27) --------------------------------------- 3-1 M. Barcenas (82) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 2-1 |
|
| 28 Mar | Portland T. W |
2:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Olivia Lynn Moultrie (53) pen. 2-0 Reilyn Sky Turner (63) |
KC Current W | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| 4 Apr | N. Carolina W |
2:2
0-1 Reilyn Sky Turner (12) 1-1 Manaka Matsukubo (28) 1-2 Olivia Lynn Moultrie (33) 2-2 A. Sanchez (37) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 2-2 |
|
| 26 Apr | Angel City W |
1:2
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Pietra Adao Tordin (76) 0-2 Sophia Olivia Wilson (90) 1-2 Prisca Chilufya (90) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 30 Apr | Portland T. W |
2:0
1-0 Marie Lena Mller (10) --------------------------------------- 2-0 Sophia Olivia Wilson (64) |
San Diego W. W | - | + | - | 1-0 |
|
| 3 May | Chicago RS W |
0:2
0-1 Olivia Lynn Moultrie (17) --------------------------------------- 0-2 Reilyn Sky Turner (89) |
Portland T. W | - | + | - | 0-1 |
|
| 8 May | R. Louisville W |
3:1
0-1 Sophia Olivia Wilson (6) 1-1 Katie OKane (14) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Katie OKane (76) 3-1 Emma C. Sears (90) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 17 May | Portland T. W |
0:0
|
Angel City W | - | + | + | 0-0 |
|
| 21 May | Portland T. W |
2:0
1-0 Mary Alice Vignola (30) --------------------------------------- 2-0 M. McKenzie (77) |
Bay FC W | - | + | - | 1-0 |
|
| 24 May | KC Current W |
3:1
0-1 Sophia Olivia Wilson (14) 1-1 N.A (41) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Temwa Chawinga (63) 3-1 H. Hopkins (90) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 30 May | Portland T. W |
2:2
1-0 Olivia Lynn Moultrie (21) 1-1 K. Hernndez (44) --------------------------------------- 1-2 C. Lacasse (50) 2-2 Sophia Olivia Wilson (90) pen. |
Utah Royals W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 5 Jul | Portland T. W |
4:0
1-0 Jayden Lee Perry (13) 2-0 Pietra Adao Tordin (36) 3-0 Reilyn Sky Turner (41) --------------------------------------- 4-0 Sophia Olivia Wilson (82) |
R. Louisville W | + | + | - | 3-0 |
|
| 12 Jul | Seattle Reign W |
2:0
1-0 Ryanne Brown (8) 2-0 Madison Mercado (43) |
Portland T. W | - | - | + | 2-0 |
|
| 18 Jul | Denver Summit W |
2:1
0-1 Sophia Olivia Wilson (25) pen. 1-1 J. Sonis (45) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Natalie Means (86) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 25 Jul | Portland T. W |
2:2
0-1 M. Williams-Purce (2) 1-1 Renee Lyles (21) --------------------------------------- 2-1 J. Fleming (53) 2-2 Samantha May Kerr (62) |
Gotham FC W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 2 Aug | Utah Royals W |
5:1
0-1 Sophia Olivia Wilson (1) 1-1 Cecelia Anne Delzer (35) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Cecelia Anne Delzer (47) 3-1 Brecken Inga Mozingo (68) 4-1 K. Hernndez (79) 5-1 K. Fava (89) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 9 Aug | Boston Legacy W |
3:4
0-1 Pietra Adao Tordin (2) 0-2 Sophia Olivia Wilson (6) 0-3 Pietra Adao Tordin (10) 1-3 B. St-Georges (31) 1-4 Pietra Adao Tordin (37) 2-4 Alba Cao Isant (42) --------------------------------------- 3-4 A. Santos (82) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 2-4 |
|
| 16 Aug | Portland T. W |
2:1
--------------------------------------- 1-0 D. Naujenis (58) 1-1 L. Muoz (63) 2-1 Caiya Hanks (90) |
Orlando Pride W | + | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 23 Aug | Portland T. W |
1:0
1-0 Sophia Olivia Wilson (44) |
Denver Summit W | - | + | - | 1-0 |
|
| 29 Aug | Gotham FC W |
1:1
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Jaedyn Reese Shaw (60) 1-1 Sophia Olivia Wilson (75) pen. |
Portland T. W | - | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 6 Sep | Portland T. W |
1:2
1-0 Sophia Olivia Wilson (18) pen. --------------------------------------- 1-1 Tara Leana Rudd (59) pen. 1-2 Melissa Bethi (80) |
Washington S. W | + | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 13 Sep | Portland T. W |
1:1
1-0 Maitane Lpez Milln (o.g.) (22) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Taylor Wood (90) |
Chicago RS W | - | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 19 Sep | Orlando Pride W |
1:4
0-1 Nina Nijstad (3) 0-2 Sophia Olivia Wilson (28) pen. 1-2 Ally Olivia Lemos (30) --------------------------------------- 1-3 M. Weaver (74) 1-4 Renee Lyles (88) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 1-2 |
|
| 27 Sep | Portland T. W |
1:1
0-1 Katherine Ann Rader (10) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Marie Lena Mller (85) |
Houston Dash W | - | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| 4 Oct | Portland T. W |
2:4
0-1 Alba Cao Isant (35) 0-2 S. Schupansky (o.g.) (39) --------------------------------------- 1-2 Pietra Adao Tordin (59) pen. 1-3 A. Santos (88) 2-3 Shae Ann Harvey (90) 2-4 A. Santos (90) |
Boston Legacy W | + | - | - | 0-2 |
|
| 18 Oct | Bay FC W |
2:2
0-1 M. Weaver (10) 1-1 Caroline Noel Conti (33) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Kennedy Linh Fuller (67) 2-2 Caiya Hanks (86) |
Portland T. W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 24 Oct | Portland T. W |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Marie Lena Mller (60) |
N. Carolina W | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| Filter Portland Thorns W results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 1 Nov | Houston Dash W vs Portland T. W | 1.29 | 1.29 | |||
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
Portland T. W (29 matches) vs league average
Portland T. W at home (15 matches) vs league average at home
Portland T. W away (14 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Portland Thorns W goals statistics indicate an average of 1.66 goals scored per game so far this season, which is higher than the average number of 1.41 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in the league. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Portland T. W | |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 22 / 29 | 76% | |
| Opponent scored first | 6 / 29 | 21% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 10 / 29 | 34% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 4 / 29 | 14% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 33.4 min. | 37% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 40.3 min. | 45% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 16.3 min. | 18% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Portland Thorns W have been in the lead for an average duration of 33.4 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 16.3 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Portland T. W | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 29 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 25 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 12 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 52% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 14 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 6 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 43% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 17 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 15 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
Portland Thorns W have taken the lead 25 times and have conceded an equalizer on 12 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 52% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 48%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 14 times that Portland T. W's opponents have taken the lead, Portland T. W have managed to score an equalizer on 6 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 43%.
|
Portland T. W | |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 11 / 15 | 73% | |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 15 | 20% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 7 / 15 | 47% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 2 / 15 | 13% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 35.9 min. | 40% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 40.9 min. | 45% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 13.3 min. | 15% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Portland T. W have been in the lead for an average duration of 35.9 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 13.3 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Portland T. W | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 15 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 13 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 5 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 62% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 5 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 3 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 60% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 9 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 3 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Portland T. W have taken the lead 13 times and have conceded an equalizer on 5 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 62% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 38%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 5 times that Portland T. W's opponents have taken the lead when Portland T. W were playing at home, Portland T. W have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 60%.
|
Portland T. W | |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 11 / 14 | 79% | |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 14 | 21% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 3 / 14 | 21% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 2 / 14 | 14% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 30.9 min. | 34% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 39.6 min. | 44% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 19.5 min. | 22% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Portland T. W have been in the lead for an average duration of 30.9 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 19.5 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Portland T. W | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 14 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 12 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 7 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 42% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 9 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 3 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 33% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 8 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 12 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Portland T. W have taken the lead 12 times and have conceded an equalizer on 7 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 42% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 58%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 9 times that Portland T. W's opponents have taken the lead when Portland T. W were playing away, Portland T. W have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 33%.
Results table
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 25 | 23 | 48 |
| GF per match | 1.67 | 1.64 | 1.66 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 13 | 28 | 41 |
| GA per match | 0.87 | 2.00 | 1.41 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.53 | 3.64 | 3.07 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 93% | 100% | 97% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 80% | 93% | 86% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 40% | 71% | 55% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 27% | 57% | 41% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 7% | 21% | 14% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 7% | 14% | 10% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 73% | 79% | 76% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 33% | 71% | 52% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 7% | 29% | 17% |
| Portland Thorns W over 2.5 stats indicate a 55% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is lower than the league average value of 57% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in the league. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 53% | 14% | 34% |
| Won-to-nil | 47% | 14% | 31% |
| Failed to score | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| Lost-to-nil | 0% | 7% | 3% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 60% | 71% | 66% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 67% | 43% | 55% |
| Scored in both halves | 33% | 21% | 28% |
| Both teams scored | 47% | 79% | 62% |
| Conceding Rate | 47% | 86% | 66% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 27% | 71% | 48% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 40% | 64% | 52% |
| Conceded in both halves | 20% | 50% | 34% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| GF over 1.5 | 60% | 43% | 52% |
| GF over 2.5 | 7% | 14% | 10% |
| GF over 3.5 | 7% | 14% | 10% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 47% | 86% | 66% |
| GA over 1.5 | 27% | 64% | 45% |
| GA over 2.5 | 7% | 36% | 21% |
| GA over 3.5 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 7% | 3% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Portland T. W matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 7% | 0% | 3% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 13% | 7% | 10% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 40% | 21% | 31% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 13% | 14% | 14% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 20% | 36% | 28% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 7% | 21% | 14% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 20% | 7% | 14% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 53% | 36% | 45% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 27% | 57% | 41% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Away wins | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 6 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Home & Away defeats | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
|
A majority of Portland T. W's wins have been obtained with a margin of 2 goals or more (7 wins), while 6 of their wins had a one-goal margin. A majority of Portland T. W's defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (6 defeats), while 2 of their defeats had a one-goal margin. |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 62% | 38% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | |
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.93 |
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.29 |
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | +0.64 |
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 52% | 48% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 32% | 68% | ||
| League average | 54% | 46% | ||
|
Matches played at home have accounted for 62% of Portland T. W's total points and 52% of the goals they have scored so far this season in the league. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 7 | 3 | 10 | 34% |
| Drawing at HT | 6 | 9 | 15 | 52% |
| Losing at HT | 2 | 2 | 4 | 14% |
| Total | 15 | 14 | 29 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
Portland T. W |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 12 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 9 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 11 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 11 | ||
| GA | 13 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 27 | 56% | |
| GA | 19 | 46% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 21 | 44% | |
| GA | 22 | 54% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 43 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 54 |
|
Portland T. W |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 12 | 48% | |
| GA | 5 | 38% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 13 | 52% | |
| GA | 8 | 62% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 50 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 55 |
|
Portland T. W |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 10 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 15 | 65% | |
| GA | 14 | 50% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 8 | 35% | |
| GA | 14 | 50% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 37 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 53 |
Portland T. W scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Portland T. W score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 2-0 so far (4 times).
The Portland T. W score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 3-1 so far (3 times).
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| This season in the league |
|
Portland T. W have scored in each of their last 14 matches. Portland T. W have scored in 14 of their 15 home matches. Portland T. W failed to keep a clean sheet in 12 of their 14 away matches. Portland T. W have scored in 13 of their 14 away matches. 68% of Portland T. W's conceded goals were conceded away. Portland T. W have scored 56% of their goals in the first half. Portland T. W have scored the opening goal in 22 of their 29 matches. Portland T. W have been undefeated in their last 4 away matches. Portland T. W have scored in each of their last 11 home matches. Portland T. W have scored in each of their last 6 away matches. Portland T. W failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 9 away matches. Portland T. W have scored 25% of their goals in the first 15 minutes. View comments for all teams |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsMatch total goals stats
Match total goals statsMatch total goals stats (last 8 matches)
Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)Match total goals stats (at home)
Match total goals stats (at home)Match total goals stats (away)
Match total goals stats (away)Example
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
