| Home | Away | Total | |
| Played | 12 | 14 | 26 |
| Points Per Game | 1.50 | 0.86 | 1.15 |
| Select Favourite Stats | |||
| View Favourite Stats for all teams | |||
 |
Houston Dash W |
(this season in the league) |
Houston Dash W's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 15 Mar | San Diego W. W |
0:1
0-1 M. Robbe (45) |
Houston Dash W | - | + | - | 0-1 |
|
| 21 Mar | Houston Dash W |
3:0
1-0 K. Zanten (43) --------------------------------------- 2-0 K. Zanten (59) 3-0 Katherine Ann Rader (65) |
Boston Legacy W | + | + | - | 1-0 |
|
| 28 Mar | Angel City W |
2:1
0-1 Maggie Isabel Graham (10) --------------------------------------- 1-1 S. Jnsdttir (47) 2-1 Riley Tiernan (49) |
Houston Dash W | + | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| 4 Apr | Houston Dash W |
4:3
0-1 Taylor Jacklyn Flint (23) pen. 1-1 Katherine Ann Rader (39) pen. --------------------------------------- 1-2 Sarah Weber (48) 2-2 K. Zanten (50) 3-2 K. Zanten (67) 3-3 Taylor Jacklyn Flint (81) pen. 4-3 Sarah Puntigam (90) pen. |
R. Louisville W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 26 Apr | Houston Dash W |
0:1
0-1 A. Sanchez (42) |
N. Carolina W | - | - | + | 0-1 |
|
| 2 May | Houston Dash W |
0:0
|
Seattle Reign W | - | + | + | 0-0 |
|
| 7 May | Utah Royals W |
2:0
1-0 C. Lacasse (38) --------------------------------------- 2-0 Courtney Brown (88) |
Houston Dash W | - | - | + | 1-0 |
|
| 10 May | Houston Dash W |
1:4
0-1 J. Sonis (15) 0-2 Natasha Jane Flint (34) 1-2 Maggie Isabel Graham (45) pen. --------------------------------------- 1-3 D. Sheehan (49) 1-4 J. Sonis (72) |
Denver Summit W | + | - | - | 1-2 |
|
| 16 May | KC Current W |
3:0
1-0 C. Campbell (o.g.) (15) 2-0 Temwa Chawinga (17) --------------------------------------- 3-0 Temwa Chawinga (68) |
Houston Dash W | + | - | + | 2-0 |
|
| 21 May | Houston Dash W |
2:2
0-1 M. Silva (20) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Kate Faasse (70) 2-1 Katherine Ann Rader (89) 2-2 Trinity Paula Byars (90) |
San Diego W. W | + | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| 24 May | Houston Dash W |
2:1
1-0 Katherine Ann Rader (17) 1-1 M. Niehues (27) pen. --------------------------------------- 2-1 Maggie Isabel Graham (90) |
Angel City W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 31 May | Gotham FC W |
1:0
1-0 Jordynn Araya Dudley (18) |
Houston Dash W | - | - | + | 1-0 |
|
| 4 Jul | Washington S. W |
2:1
--------------------------------------- 1-0 T. Moyer-Rodman (50) 1-1 Kate Faasse (89) 2-1 T. Moyer-Rodman (90) |
Houston Dash W | + | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 12 Jul | Denver Summit W |
2:2
1-0 Yazmeen Ann Ryan (14) 1-1 Katherine Ann Rader (15) 2-1 J. Sonis (45) pen. --------------------------------------- 2-2 L. Ullmark (48) |
Houston Dash W | + | - | - | 2-1 |
|
| 19 Jul | R. Louisville W |
1:1
1-0 Kayla Fischer (19) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Katherine Ann Rader (90) |
Houston Dash W | - | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 25 Jul | Houston Dash W |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 L. Ullmark (90) |
Bay FC W | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| 2 Aug | Houston Dash W |
0:1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Samantha May Kerr (46) |
Gotham FC W | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 9 Aug | Houston Dash W |
1:1
0-1 D. Oliveira (44) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Katherine Ann Rader (81) pen. |
KC Current W | - | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| 16 Aug | N. Carolina W |
2:3
1-0 A. Schlegel (37) 1-1 Kate Faasse (42) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Evelyn Ijeh (51) 2-2 Clarissa Larisey (80) 2-3 Clarissa Larisey (90) |
Houston Dash W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 20 Aug | Houston Dash W |
5:0
1-0 Katherine Ann Rader (5) 2-0 Katherine Ann Rader (42) 3-0 L. Ullmark (45) --------------------------------------- 4-0 Kate Faasse (79) 5-0 Lisa Boattin (90) |
Chicago RS W | + | + | - | 3-0 |
|
| 23 Aug | Bay FC W |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Cristiana Girelli (89) |
Houston Dash W | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 30 Aug | Seattle Reign W |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 M. Dahlien (52) |
Houston Dash W | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 7 Sep | Orlando Pride W |
3:1
1-0 Leah Michelle Klenke (o.g.) (14) 2-0 Barbra Banda (44) pen. --------------------------------------- 3-0 H. McCutcheon (64) 3-1 K. Zanten (72) |
Houston Dash W | + | - | - | 2-0 |
|
| 13 Sep | Houston Dash W |
0:1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Mina Tanaka (69) |
Utah Royals W | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 20 Sep | Boston Legacy W |
1:2
0-1 D. Colaprico (44) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Assata Traor (59) 1-2 M. Bright (85) |
Houston Dash W | + | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| 27 Sep | Portland T. W |
1:1
0-1 Katherine Ann Rader (10) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Marie Lena Mller (85) |
Houston Dash W | - | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| Filter Houston Dash W results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 4 Oct | Houston Dash W vs Washington S. W | 1.50 | 2.08 | |||
| 18 Oct | Houston Dash W vs Orlando Pride W | 1.50 | 1.08 | |||
| 24 Oct | Chicago RS W vs Houston Dash W | 1.08 | 0.86 | |||
| 1 Nov | Houston Dash W vs Portland T. W | 1.50 | 1.31 | |||
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.39 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
Run-in overview | ||||||
|
Of their 4 remaining matches in the league, Houston Dash W will be playing more matches at home (3) than away (1).
Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, Houston Dash W's remaining home matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining away matches.
Houston Dash W's opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 1.49 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that Houston Dash W will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 1.08 Points Per Game at home in the league. | ||||||
| View opponents PPG values for all teams | ||||||
| Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
Houston Dash W (26 matches) vs league average
Houston Dash W at home (12 matches) vs league average at home
Houston Dash W away (14 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Houston Dash W goals statistics indicate an average of 1.23 goals scored per game so far this season, which is lower than the average number of 1.39 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in the league. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Houston Dash W | |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 8 / 26 | 31% | |
| Opponent scored first | 17 / 26 | 65% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 6 / 26 | 23% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 10 / 26 | 38% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 12.8 min. | 14% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 46.5 min. | 52% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 30.6 min. | 34% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Houston Dash W have been in the lead for an average duration of 12.8 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 30.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Houston Dash W | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 26 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 14 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 6 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 57% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 22 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 10 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 45% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 8 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 8 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
Houston Dash W have taken the lead 14 times and have conceded an equalizer on 6 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 57% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 43%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 22 times that Houston Dash W's opponents have taken the lead, Houston Dash W have managed to score an equalizer on 10 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 45%.
|
Houston Dash W | |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 4 / 12 | 33% | |
| Opponent scored first | 7 / 12 | 58% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 2 / 12 | 17% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 4 / 12 | 33% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 13.1 min. | 15% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 52.5 min. | 58% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 24.4 min. | 27% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Houston Dash W have been in the lead for an average duration of 13.1 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 24.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Houston Dash W | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 12 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 8 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 3 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 62% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 8 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 4 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 7 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 3 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Houston Dash W have taken the lead 8 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 62% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 38%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 8 times that Houston Dash W's opponents have taken the lead when Houston Dash W were playing at home, Houston Dash W have managed to score an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 50%.
|
Houston Dash W | |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 4 / 14 | 29% | |
| Opponent scored first | 10 / 14 | 71% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 4 / 14 | 29% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 6 / 14 | 43% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 12.6 min. | 14% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 41.4 min. | 46% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 35.9 min. | 40% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Houston Dash W have been in the lead for an average duration of 12.6 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 35.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Houston Dash W | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 14 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 6 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 3 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 50% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 14 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 6 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 43% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 1 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 5 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Houston Dash W have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 14 times that Houston Dash W's opponents have taken the lead when Houston Dash W were playing away, Houston Dash W have managed to score an equalizer on 6 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 43%.
Results table
Houston Dash W stats rank the team in 12th position in the the league table with 30 points, 3 points behind Orlando Pride W. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 19 | 13 | 32 |
| GF per match | 1.58 | 0.93 | 1.23 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 14 | 22 | 36 |
| GA per match | 1.17 | 1.57 | 1.38 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.75 | 2.50 | 2.62 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 92% | 100% | 96% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 58% | 71% | 65% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 33% | 21% | 27% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 25% | 7% | 15% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 8% | 0% | 4% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 67% | 79% | 73% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 33% | 29% | 31% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 17% | 7% | 12% |
| Houston Dash W over 2.5 stats indicate a 50% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is lower than the league average value of 56% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in the league. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 33% | 7% | 19% |
| Won-to-nil | 25% | 7% | 15% |
| Failed to score | 33% | 36% | 35% |
| Lost-to-nil | 25% | 36% | 31% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 67% | 64% | 65% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 42% | 43% | 42% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 58% | 43% | 50% |
| Scored in both halves | 33% | 21% | 27% |
| Both teams scored | 42% | 57% | 50% |
| Conceding Rate | 67% | 93% | 81% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 42% | 71% | 58% |
| Conceded in both halves | 25% | 29% | 27% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 67% | 64% | 65% |
| GF over 1.5 | 42% | 21% | 31% |
| GF over 2.5 | 25% | 7% | 15% |
| GF over 3.5 | 17% | 0% | 8% |
| GF over 4.5 | 8% | 0% | 4% |
| GA over 0.5 | 67% | 93% | 81% |
| GA over 1.5 | 25% | 50% | 38% |
| GA over 2.5 | 17% | 14% | 15% |
| GA over 3.5 | 8% | 0% | 4% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Houston Dash W matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 8% | 0% | 4% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 33% | 29% | 31% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 8% | 21% | 15% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 17% | 29% | 23% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 8% | 14% | 12% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 25% | 7% | 15% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 42% | 29% | 35% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 25% | 50% | 38% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 33% | 21% | 27% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Away wins | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
|
A majority of Houston Dash W's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (6 wins), while 2 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more. A majority of Houston Dash W's defeats had a one-goal margin (8 defeats), while 4 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more. |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 60% | 40% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | |
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.50 |
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 0.86 |
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | +0.64 |
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 59% | 41% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 39% | 61% | ||
| League average | 55% | 45% | ||
|
Matches played at home have accounted for 60% of Houston Dash W's total points and 59% of the goals they have scored so far this season in the league. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 2 | 4 | 6 | 23% |
| Drawing at HT | 6 | 4 | 10 | 38% |
| Losing at HT | 4 | 6 | 10 | 38% |
| Total | 12 | 14 | 26 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
Houston Dash W |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 12 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 13 | 41% | |
| GA | 17 | 47% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 19 | 59% | |
| GA | 19 | 53% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 59 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 48 |
|
Houston Dash W |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 7 | 37% | |
| GA | 7 | 50% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 12 | 63% | |
| GA | 7 | 50% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 61 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 47 |
|
Houston Dash W |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 6 | 46% | |
| GA | 10 | 45% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 7 | 54% | |
| GA | 12 | 55% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 55 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 48 |
Houston Dash W scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Houston Dash W score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 0-1 so far (3 times).
The Houston Dash W score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-0 so far (3 times).
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| This season in the league |
|
Houston Dash W failed to keep a clean sheet in 8 of their 12 home matches. Houston Dash W failed to keep a clean sheet in 13 of their 14 away matches. Houston Dash W have conceded the opening goal in 17 of their 26 matches. Houston Dash W failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 13 away matches. Houston Dash W have scored 38% of their goals after the 75th minute. View comments for all teams |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsMatch total goals stats
Match total goals statsMatch total goals stats (last 8 matches)
Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)Match total goals stats (at home)
Match total goals stats (at home)Match total goals stats (away)
Match total goals stats (away)Example
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
