| Home | Away | Total | |
| Played | 8 | 8 | 16 |
| Points Per Game | 2.63 | 2.00 | 2.31 |
| Select Favourite Stats | |||
| View Favourite Stats for all teams | |||
 |
Rigas FS |
(this season in the league) |
RFS' progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 5 Mar | Auda |
1 - 2
0-1 Niks Sliede (1) 0-2 Darko Lemajic (14) --------------------------------------- 1-2 Matheus Clemente (58) |
RFS | + | - | - | 0-2 | stats |
| 11 Mar | RFS |
1 - 0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Darko Lemajic (90) |
FS Jelgava | - | + | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 15 Mar | Daugavpils |
1 - 2
0-1 Žiga Lipušcek (32) 0-2 Darko Lemajic (39) --------------------------------------- 1-2 Maksims Kopilovs (73) |
RFS | + | - | - | 0-2 | stats |
| 29 Mar | RFS |
4 - 1
0-1 Djibril Gueye (11) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Yukiyoshi Karashima (47) 2-1 Darko Lemajic (48) 3-1 Janis Ikaunieks (54) 4-1 Lasha Odisharia (88) |
Liepaja | + | - | - | 0-1 | stats |
| 4 Apr | Metta |
1 - 0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Rudolfs Klavinskis (54) |
RFS | - | - | + | 0-0 | stats |
| 9 Apr | RFS |
2 - 0
1-0 J. Porsan-Clemente (28) 2-0 Stefan Panic (45) pen. |
Tukums | - | + | - | 2-0 | stats |
| 15 Apr | Grobina |
1 - 4
0-1 Žiga Lipušcek (9) --------------------------------------- 0-2 Mor Talla Gaye (57) 1-2 Arwin Javad (69) 1-3 J. Porsan-Clemente (74) 1-4 Stefan Panic (84) pen. |
RFS | + | - | - | 0-1 | stats |
| 20 Apr | Super Nova |
1 - 2
0-1 Darko Lemajic (7) 1-1 Ralfs Šitjakovs (45) --------------------------------------- 1-2 A. Kouadio (65) |
RFS | + | - | - | 1-1 | stats |
| 26 Apr | RFS |
0 - 1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Orlando Galo (81) |
Riga FC | - | - | + | 0-0 | stats |
| 1 May | RFS |
1 - 0
1-0 Darko Lemajic (39) |
Auda | - | + | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 5 May | FS Jelgava |
2 - 2
--------------------------------------- 1-0 K. Emenike (76) 1-1 Elvis Stuglis (83) 1-2 Elvis Stuglis (84) 2-2 Arturs Janovskis (90) |
RFS | + | - | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 9 May | RFS |
5 - 1
1-0 Darko Lemajic (12) 2-0 Darko Lemajic (16) --------------------------------------- 3-0 Darko Lemajic (62) 4-0 Mor Talla Gaye (71) 4-1 Barthelemy Diedhiou (87) 5-1 Mor Talla Gaye (88) |
Daugavpils | + | - | - | 2-0 | stats |
| 14 May | Liepaja |
2 - 1
1-0 Bruno Melnis (16) 1-1 Mor Talla Gaye (24) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Joseph Oloko Ede (47) |
RFS | + | - | - | 1-1 | stats |
| 20 May | RFS |
2 - 0
1-0 Dmitrijs Zelenkovs (3) --------------------------------------- 2-0 Stefan Panic (48) |
Metta | - | + | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 25 May | Tukums |
2 - 5
0-1 Darko Lemajic (26) 0-2 Mor Talla Gaye (37) 0-3 Yukiyoshi Karashima (45) --------------------------------------- 1-3 Arturs Krancmanis (50) 2-3 Bogdans Samoilovs (52) 2-4 Darko Lemajic (68) 2-5 Janis Ikaunieks (90) |
RFS | + | - | - | 0-3 | stats |
| 31 May | RFS |
6 - 0
1-0 Darko Lemajic (6) 2-0 Janis Ikaunieks (12) 3-0 Janis Ikaunieks (19) 4-0 Elvis Stuglis (33) --------------------------------------- 5-0 Dmitrijs Zelenkovs (47) 6-0 Darko Lemajic (90) |
Grobina | + | + | - | 4-0 | stats |
| Filter Rigas FS results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 14 Jun | RFS | - | Super Nova | 2.63 | 0.88 | |
| 18 Jun | Riga FC | - | RFS | 2.13 | 2.00 | |
| 22 Jun | RFS | - | Auda | 2.63 | 0.86 | |
| 26 Jun | FS Jelgava | - | RFS | 2.13 | 2.00 | |
| 30 Jun | Daugavpils | - | RFS | 2.00 | 2.00 | |
| 4 Jul | RFS | - | Liepaja | 2.63 | 0.88 | |
| 19 Jul | Metta | - | RFS | 1.00 | 2.00 | |
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.41 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
Run-in overview | ||||||
|
Of their 7 remaining matches in the Latvian league, RFS will be playing more matches away (4) than at home (3).
Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, RFS's remaining away matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining home matches.
RFS's opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 0.87 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that Rigas FS will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 1.82 Points Per Game at home in the league. | ||||||
| View opponents PPG values for all teams | ||||||
| Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
RFS (16 matches) compared to league average
RFS at home (8 matches) compared to league average at home
RFS away (8 matches) compared to league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rigas FS goals statistics indicate an average of 2.44 goals scored per game so far this season, which is higher than the average number of 1.43 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in Latvia - Virsliga. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
RFS | |
| Leading & trailing stats (total) | (this season in the league) |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 11 / 16 | 69% | |
| Opponent scored first | 5 / 16 | 31% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at half-time | 9 / 16 | 56% | |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 1 / 16 | 6% | |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 47.8 min. | 53% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 33.5 min. | 37% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 8.7 min. | 10% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Rigas FS have been in the lead for an average duration of 47.8 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 8.7 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
RFS | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | (this season in the league) |
| Matches played | 16 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 14 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 2 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 86% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 6 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 3 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 22 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 6 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
Rigas FS have taken the lead 14 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 86% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 14%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 6 times that RFS's opponents have taken the lead, RFS have managed to score an equalizer on 3 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 50%.
|
RFS | |
| Leading & trailing stats (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 6 / 8 | 75% | |
| Opponent scored first | 2 / 8 | 25% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at half-time | 5 / 8 | 62% | |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 1 / 8 | 12% | |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 50.5 min. | 56% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 33.9 min. | 38% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 5.6 min. | 6% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, RFS have been in the lead for an average duration of 50.5 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 5.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
RFS | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| Matches played | 8 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 7 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 0 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 100% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 2 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 1 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 13 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 1 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, RFS have taken the lead 7 times and have conceded an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 100% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 0%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 2 times that RFS's opponents have taken the lead when RFS were playing at home, RFS have managed to score an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a home equalizing rate of 50%.
|
RFS | |
| Leading & trailing stats (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 5 / 8 | 62% | |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 8 | 38% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at half-time | 4 / 8 | 50% | |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 0 / 8 | 0% | |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 45.1 min. | 50% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 33.1 min. | 37% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 11.8 min. | 13% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, RFS have been in the lead for an average duration of 45.1 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 11.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
RFS | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| Matches played | 8 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 7 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 2 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 71% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 4 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 2 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 9 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 5 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, RFS have taken the lead 7 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 71% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 29%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 4 times that RFS's opponents have taken the lead when RFS were playing away, RFS have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 50%.
Results table
RFS stats rank the team in 2nd position in the Latvia - Virsliga table with 37 points, 2 points behind Riga FC and 12 points above Auda. The above table shows RFS results against each league opponent. The tables below provide additional statistics regarding RFS's season in the Latvian league. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 21 | 18 | 39 |
| GF per match | 2.63 | 2.25 | 2.44 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 3 | 11 | 14 |
| GA per match | 0.38 | 1.38 | 0.88 |
| GF + GA per match | 3.00 | 3.63 | 3.31 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 62% | 88% | 75% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 38% | 88% | 62% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 38% | 38% | 38% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 38% | 25% | 31% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 25% | 12% | 19% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 75% | 75% | 75% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 38% | 62% | 50% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 12% | 12% | 12% |
| Rigas FS over 2.5 stats indicate a 62% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is higher than the league average value of 49% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in Latvia - Virsliga. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 62% | 0% | 31% |
| Won-to-nil | 62% | 0% | 31% |
| Failed to score | 12% | 12% | 12% |
| Lost-to-nil | 12% | 12% | 12% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-Half | 62% | 75% | 69% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-Half | 62% | 50% | 56% |
| Scored in both halves | 38% | 38% | 38% |
| Both teams scored | 25% | 88% | 56% |
| Conceding Rate | 38% | 100% | 69% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 12% | 25% | 19% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 25% | 88% | 56% |
| Conceded in both halves | 0% | 12% | 6% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| GF over 1.5 | 62% | 75% | 69% |
| GF over 2.5 | 38% | 25% | 31% |
| GF over 3.5 | 38% | 25% | 31% |
| GF over 4.5 | 25% | 12% | 19% |
| GA over 0.5 | 38% | 100% | 69% |
| GA over 1.5 | 0% | 38% | 19% |
| GA over 2.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in RFS matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 38% | 12% | 25% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 25% | 0% | 12% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 0% | 50% | 25% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 0% | 12% | 6% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 38% | 25% | 31% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 38% | 12% | 25% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 25% | 50% | 38% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 38% | 38% | 38% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Away wins | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
A majority of RFS' wins have been obtained with a margin of 2 goals or more (7 wins), while 5 of their wins had a one-goal margin. A majority of RFS' defeats had a one-goal margin (3 defeats), while 0 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more. |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 57% | 43% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | ||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 2.63 | |||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 2.00 | |||
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | +0.63 | |||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored (GF) | 54% | 46% | ||
| % Goals conceded (GA) | 21% | 79% | ||
| League average (% goals) | 62% | 38% | ||
| Matches played at home have accounted for 57% of RFS's total points and 54% of the goals they have scored so far this season in Latvia - Virsliga. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 5 | 4 | 9 | 56% |
| Drawing at HT | 2 | 4 | 6 | 38% |
| Losing at HT | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6% |
| Total | 8 | 8 | 16 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
RFS |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 20 | 51% | |
| GA | 3 | 21% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 19 | 49% | |
| GA | 11 | 79% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 46 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 58 |
|
RFS |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 10 | 48% | |
| GA | 1 | 33% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 11 | 52% | |
| GA | 2 | 67% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 45 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 60 |
|
RFS |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 10 | 56% | |
| GA | 2 | 18% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 8 | 44% | |
| GA | 9 | 82% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 47 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 57 |
RFS scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The RFS score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-2 so far (3 times). |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This season in the league |
| RFS have won 12 of their 16 matches. RFS have won 5 of their 8 away matches. RFS have scored in each of their last 7 matches. RFS conceded at least one goal in each of their 8 away matches. RFS have scored in 7 of their 8 away matches. 79% of RFS's conceded goals were conceded away. 79% of RFS's conceded goals occurred in the second half. RFS were leading at half-time in 9 of their 16 matches. RFS have won their last 4 home matches. RFS have scored 2 goals or more in each of their last 3 matches. RFS have scored 21% of their goals in the first 15 minutes. |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsTotal match goals stats
Total match goals stats (last 8 matches)
Total match goals stats (at home)
Total match goals stats (away)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
