| Home | Away | Total | |
| Played | 8 | 8 | 16 |
| Points Per Game | 1.13 | 0.50 | 0.81 |
| Select Favourite Stats | |||
| View Favourite Stats for all teams | |||
 |
Tukums |
(this season in the league) |
Tukums' progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 8 Mar | FS Jelgava |
2:1
1-0 Filip Hasek (19) 1-1 N.A (26) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Filip Hasek (62) |
Tukums | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 15 Mar | Ogre United |
1:1
0-1 N.A (42) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Kristers Volkovs (o.g.) (57) |
Tukums | - | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| 22 Mar | Tukums |
1:2
0-1 N.A (15) 0-2 N.A (25) --------------------------------------- 1-2 Raivis Kirss (78) |
Super Nova | + | - | - | 0-2 |
|
| 5 Apr | Tukums |
1:1
1-0 Leoni Gastaldelo (40) 1-1 Rolandas Baravykas (42) |
Grobina | - | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 9 Apr | Riga FC |
3:3
1-0 Paulo Eduardo (30) 1-1 Joseph Oloko Ede (40) 2-1 Renars Varslavans (45) --------------------------------------- 2-2 Joseph Oloko Ede (52) pen. 3-2 Reginaldo Ramires (73) 3-3 Joseph Oloko Ede (87) |
Tukums | + | - | - | 2-1 |
|
| 13 Apr | Tukums |
1:2
0-1 Mor Talla (2) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Leoni Gastaldelo (56) 1-2 Martins Stals (o.g.) (90) |
RFS | + | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| 17 Apr | Tukums |
2:2
1-0 N.A (8) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Ivans Patrikejevs (58) 1-2 Ivans Patrikejevs (84) 2-2 Martins Stals (90) |
Liepaja | + | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 21 Apr | Tukums |
1:1
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Joseph Oloko Ede (47) 1-1 Joel Yakubu (60) |
Daugavpils | - | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 26 Apr | Auda |
2:1
1-0 Eduards Daskevics (22) 1-1 Joseph Oloko Ede (45) 2-1 Hussaini Ibrahim (45) |
Tukums | + | - | - | 2-1 |
|
| 1 May | Tukums |
5:0
1-0 Rudolfs Reingolcs (6) 2-0 Alans Kangars (o.g.) (11) 3-0 Bogdans Samoilovs (21) --------------------------------------- 4-0 Joseph Oloko Ede (86) 5-0 Joseph Oloko Ede (89) |
FS Jelgava | + | + | - | 3-0 |
|
| 7 May | Tukums |
6:1
1-0 Joseph Oloko Ede (35) 2-0 Leoni Gastaldelo (41) --------------------------------------- 3-0 N.A (68) 3-1 Kristers Cudars (75) 4-1 Joseph Oloko Ede (79) 5-1 Joseph Oloko Ede (90) 6-1 Joseph Oloko Ede (90) |
Ogre United | + | - | - | 2-0 |
|
| 11 May | Super Nova |
1:1
1-0 Agris Glaudans (18) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Davis Valmiers (90) |
Tukums | - | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 15 May | Grobina |
3:3
1-0 Artjoms Puzirevskis (1) 2-0 Artem Kholod (11) 2-1 Leoni Gastaldelo (13) 2-2 N.A (45) --------------------------------------- 3-2 N.A (o.g.) (64) 3-3 Joseph Oloko Ede (90) |
Tukums | + | - | - | 2-2 |
|
| 20 May | Tukums |
1:3
0-1 Joseph Oloko Ede (o.g.) (16) 0-2 A. Cernomordijs (20) 1-2 Joseph Oloko Ede (40) --------------------------------------- 1-3 Mohamed Badamosi (59) |
Riga FC | + | - | - | 1-2 |
|
| 25 May | RFS |
3:1
1-0 Darko Lemajic (10) 2-0 I. Baturins (o.g.) (23) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Joseph Oloko Ede (60) 3-1 Ziga Lipuscek (65) |
Tukums | + | - | - | 2-0 |
|
| 30 May | Liepaja |
3:0
1-0 Fellipe Cardoso (19) pen. 2-0 Kyvon Leidsman (37) --------------------------------------- 3-0 Djibril Guye (58) |
Tukums | + | - | + | 2-0 |
|
| Filter Tukums results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 12 Jun | Tukums vs Daugavpils | 1.13 | 0.86 | |||
| 17 Jun | Tukums vs Auda | 1.13 | 2.38 | |||
| 21 Jun | FS Jelgava vs Tukums | 1.00 | 0.50 | |||
| 26 Jun | Ogre United vs Tukums | 0.50 | 0.50 | |||
| 1 Jul | Tukums vs Super Nova | 1.13 | 1.67 | |||
| 5 Jul | Grobina vs Tukums | 0.38 | 0.50 | |||
| 18 Jul | Riga FC vs Tukums | 2.50 | 0.50 | |||
| 26 Jul | Tukums vs RFS | 1.13 | 3.00 | |||
| 2 Aug | Liepaja vs Tukums | 1.75 | 0.50 | |||
| 8 Aug | Daugavpils vs Tukums | 1.33 | 0.50 | |||
| 21 Aug | Auda vs Tukums | 1.88 | 0.50 | |||
| 29 Aug | Tukums vs FS Jelgava | 1.13 | 0.88 | |||
| 5 Sep | Tukums vs Ogre United | 1.13 | 0.00 | |||
| 11 Sep | Super Nova vs Tukums | 0.71 | 0.50 | |||
| 20 Sep | Tukums vs Grobina | 1.13 | 1.25 | |||
| 10 Oct | Tukums vs Riga FC | 1.13 | 2.38 | |||
| 17 Oct | RFS vs Tukums | 2.38 | 0.50 | |||
| 24 Oct | Tukums vs Liepaja | 1.13 | 1.00 | |||
| 1 Nov | Daugavpils vs Tukums | 1.33 | 0.50 | |||
| 8 Nov | Tukums vs Auda | 1.13 | 2.38 | |||
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.48 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
Run-in overview | ||||||
|
Of their 20 remaining matches in the Latvian league, Tukums will be playing as many matches at home and away (10 in each case).
Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, Tukums's remaining home matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining away matches.
Tukums's opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 1.58 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that Tukums will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 1.38 Points Per Game at home in the league. | ||||||
| View opponents PPG values for all teams | ||||||
| Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
Tukums (16 matches) vs league average
Tukums at home (8 matches) vs league average at home
Tukums away (8 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tukums goals statistics indicate an average of 1.81 goals scored per game so far this season, which is higher than the average number of 1.51 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in Latvia - Virsliga. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Tukums | |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 6 / 16 | 38% | |
| Opponent scored first | 10 / 16 | 62% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 4 / 16 | 25% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 8 / 16 | 50% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 13.7 min. | 15% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 36.6 min. | 41% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 39.8 min. | 44% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Tukums have been in the lead for an average duration of 13.7 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 39.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Tukums | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 16 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 6 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 4 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 33% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 17 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 10 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 59% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 13 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 9 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
Tukums have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 33% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 67%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 17 times that Tukums's opponents have taken the lead, Tukums have managed to score an equalizer on 10 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 59%.
|
Tukums | |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 5 / 8 | 62% | |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 8 | 38% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 3 / 8 | 38% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 3 / 8 | 38% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 25.5 min. | 28% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 38.4 min. | 43% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 26.1 min. | 29% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Tukums have been in the lead for an average duration of 25.5 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 26.1 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Tukums | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 8 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 5 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 3 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 40% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 5 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 2 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 40% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 11 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 4 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Tukums have taken the lead 5 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 40% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 60%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 5 times that Tukums's opponents have taken the lead when Tukums were playing at home, Tukums have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 40%.
|
Tukums | |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 1 / 8 | 12% | |
| Opponent scored first | 7 / 8 | 88% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 1 / 8 | 12% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 5 / 8 | 62% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 1.9 min. | 2% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 34.8 min. | 39% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 53.4 min. | 59% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Tukums have been in the lead for an average duration of 1.9 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 53.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Tukums | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 8 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 1 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 1 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 0% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 12 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 8 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 67% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 2 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 5 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Tukums have taken the lead 1 time and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 0% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 100%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 12 times that Tukums's opponents have taken the lead when Tukums were playing away, Tukums have managed to score an equalizer on 8 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 67%.
Results table
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 18 | 11 | 29 |
| GF per match | 2.25 | 1.38 | 1.81 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 12 | 18 | 30 |
| GA per match | 1.50 | 2.25 | 1.88 |
| GF + GA per match | 3.75 | 3.63 | 3.69 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 75% | 75% | 75% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 50% | 38% | 44% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 12% | 25% | 19% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 88% | 100% | 94% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 62% | 75% | 69% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 25% | 38% | 31% |
| Tukums over 2.5 stats indicate a 75% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is higher than the league average value of 55% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in Latvia - Virsliga. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 12% | 0% | 6% |
| Won-to-nil | 12% | 0% | 6% |
| Failed to score | 0% | 12% | 6% |
| Lost-to-nil | 0% | 12% | 6% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 100% | 88% | 94% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 62% | 62% | 62% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 75% | 50% | 62% |
| Scored in both halves | 38% | 25% | 31% |
| Both teams scored | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| Conceding Rate | 88% | 100% | 94% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 50% | 88% | 69% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 62% | 75% | 69% |
| Conceded in both halves | 25% | 62% | 44% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 100% | 88% | 94% |
| GF over 1.5 | 38% | 25% | 31% |
| GF over 2.5 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| GF over 3.5 | 25% | 0% | 12% |
| GF over 4.5 | 25% | 0% | 12% |
| GA over 0.5 | 88% | 100% | 94% |
| GA over 1.5 | 50% | 75% | 62% |
| GA over 2.5 | 12% | 50% | 31% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Tukums matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 25% | 38% | 31% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 25% | 12% | 19% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 50% | 62% | 56% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 50% | 38% | 44% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Away wins | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
|
A majority of Tukums' defeats had a one-goal margin (4 defeats), while 3 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more. |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 69% | 31% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | |
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.13 |
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 0.50 |
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | +0.63 |
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 62% | 38% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 40% | 60% | ||
| League average | 55% | 45% | ||
|
Matches played at home have accounted for 69% of Tukums's total points and 62% of the goals they have scored so far this season in Latvia - Virsliga. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 3 | 1 | 4 | 25% |
| Drawing at HT | 2 | 2 | 4 | 25% |
| Losing at HT | 3 | 5 | 8 | 50% |
| Total | 8 | 8 | 16 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
Tukums |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 10 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 14 | 48% | |
| GA | 18 | 60% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 15 | 52% | |
| GA | 12 | 40% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 54 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 40 |
|
Tukums |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 8 | 44% | |
| GA | 6 | 50% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 10 | 56% | |
| GA | 6 | 50% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 54 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 46 |
|
Tukums |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 6 | 55% | |
| GA | 12 | 67% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 5 | 45% | |
| GA | 6 | 33% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 54 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 37 |
Tukums scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| This season in the league |
|
Tukums have lost their last 3 matches. Tukums have failed to win in their last 5 matches. Tukums failed to keep a clean sheet in 7 of their 8 home matches. Tukums have scored in each of their 8 home matches. Tukums failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their 8 away matches. Tukums have scored in 7 of their 8 away matches. 60% of Tukums's conceded goals occurred in the first half. Tukums have conceded the opening goal in 10 of their 16 matches. Tukums were losing at half-time in 8 of their 16 matches. Tukums have failed to win in their last 8 away matches. Tukums failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 8 away matches. Tukums have conceded a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 4 matches. Tukums have scored 34% of their goals after the 75th minute. View comments for all teams |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsMatch total goals stats
Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)
Match total goals stats (at home)
Match total goals stats (away)
Example
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
