SoccerSTATS.com back to top
LEAGUES MATCHES STATS FAV BLOG

 Favourite leagues
 -----------------------------------
 My Favourites
 ----------------------------------- Select favourites
 Featured leagues
 ----------------------------------- ENG - Premier League ITA - Serie A SPA - La Liga FRA - Ligue 1 GER - Bundesliga
 All leagues
 ----------------------------------- See 'Search league' box Display all leagues
 International (clubs)
 ----------------------------------- Champions League Europa League Conference League Copa Libertadores Copa Sudamericana AFC Champions League FIFA Club World Cup Champions League (W)
 International (nations)
 ----------------------------------- EURO 2024 Euro Qualification UEFA Nations League World Cup 2022 WC Qualification Europe WC Qual. South-America WC Qualification Asia Copa America Africa Cup of Nations Asian Cup Women's World Cup Women's EURO 2025
LOGIN
usa2
USA - USL Championship
2025 2024
Favourite Stats  Tables Home / Away tables Form tables Tables by Date Half-time stats Wide table Points performance Performance rating Run-in analysis Relative form Projected points Home advantage Points Won/Lost  Matches Matches by date Results grid Results filter Current streaks  Goals per match Over / Under Total Goals Goal ranges Average goals Scored / conceded Both teams scored Goal margins  Goal timing Goals per 10 min. Goals per 15 min. First Goal stats Scored in both halves  Leading / losing Lead durations Scored / conceded first Leading / Trailing at HT Goal types Equalisers scored Equalisers conceded
MLSUSL ChampionshipUSL League OneNSWLUSL Super League
Birmingham L. Charleston Colorado S. Detroit City El Paso FC Tulsa Hartford A. Indy Eleven Las Vegas L. Lexington Loudoun Utd Louisville City Miami FC Monterey Bay New Mexico North Carolina Oakland Roots Orange County Phoenix Rising Pittsburgh Rhode Island Sacramento R. San Antonio Tampa Bay
LATEST MATCHES FORM TABLES HEAD-TO-HEAD GOALS HALF-TIME TIMING FIRST GOAL FAVOURITE STATS
🔍

Birmingham L. vs Colorado S.

advertisement


Visual table

  GP Pts
1  Louisville City 22 51
2  Charleston 22 47
3  FC Tulsa 22 42
4  Sacramento R. 21 34
5  Loudoun Utd 22 34
6  North Carolina 21 33
7  El Paso 21 32
8  San Antonio 21 30
9  Hartford A. 21 29
10  Detroit City 22 29
11  Phoenix Rising 22 29
12  Orange County 20 28
13  Pittsburgh 22 28
14  Lexington 22 28
15  Colorado S. 21 27
16  New Mexico 20 27
17  Oakland Roots 21 24
18  Monterey Bay 23 24
19  Rhode Island 22 24
20  Indy Eleven 21 23
21  Las Vegas L. 22 23
22  Tampa Bay 21 21
23  Birmingham L. 22 21
24  Miami FC 22 20

 
Sun 20 Jul 2025
Birmingham L.0 1Colorado S.
0:1 Marco Micaletto (83)






Seasonal streaks


3rd consecutive home game with no goal scored for Birmingham L..
4th consecutive away game where Colorado S. scored.
3rd consecutive game where Birmingham L. conceded.
 

 
Lead durations in 90 minutes of regular time
090
Birmingham L.Level (83)Colorado S. (7)
Lead durations tables
  How are the duration values calculated?⌄

To calculate the above duration values based on a total of 90 minutes, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are considered scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are considered scored on the 90th minute.


Outcome Surprise-Level

Points Per Game (before the match)
Birmingham L.
at home		Colorado S.
away
1.000.78


OutcomeOutcome surprise-level
Away win
53.7%
Scale:
from 0 (less surprising) to 100 (more surprising)

Outcome Surprise-levels

More information on the calculation of the Outcome surprise-level is outlined in the following blog article:
Evaluating surprising results







 






 flag

Birmingham L.

 (this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 12 2 4 6  
  Away 10 2 5 3  
  Total 22 4 9 9  
PPG (Home): 0.83
PPG (Away): 1.10
PPG (Total): 0.95

Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game0.95 1.00 +5.3%
AVG Goals For1.27 1.63 +28.3%
AVG Goals Against1.68 2.00 +19.0%



Birmingham L.'s progression (home & away)
Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
9 Mar Birmingham L. 1 - 3

1-0   Jacob Rufe (2)
     1-1   Jacob Erlandson (5)
     1-2   Abdellatif Aboukoura (33)
---------------------------------------
     1-3   Zach Ryan (50)
Loudoun Utd + - - 1-2 stats
16 Mar Birmingham L. 1 - 1

     0-1   Manny Perez (30)
1-1   Ronaldo Damus (45)
Louisville City - - - 1-1 stats
22 Mar Detroit City 2 - 2

1-0   Darren Smith (20)
     1-1   Ronaldo Damus (27)
2-1   Ben Morris (33)
---------------------------------------
     2-2   Stephen Carroll (o.g.) (80)
Birmingham L. + - - 2-1 stats
29 Mar Pittsburgh 2 - 0

1-0   Robbie Mertz (36)
---------------------------------------
2-0   Danny Griffin (70)
Birmingham L. - - + 1-0 stats
13 Apr Birmingham L. 3 - 1

     0-1   Wilmer Cabrera (26)
1-1   Ronaldo Damus (30)
---------------------------------------
2-1   Ronaldo Damus (61) pen.
3-1   Dawson McCartney (90)
El Paso + - - 1-1 stats
19 Apr Hartford A. 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Deshane Beckford (71)
Birmingham L. - - + 0-0 stats
3 May Tampa Bay 2 - 2

1-0   Leonardo Fernandes (26) pen.
---------------------------------------
     1-1   Enzo Martínez (70)
     1-2   Daniel Trejo (76)
2-2   P. Niyongabire (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-0 stats
15 May Birmingham L. 0 - 1

     0-1   Maxi Rodríguez (14)
Rhode Island - - + 0-1 stats
18 May Birmingham L. 1 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Alex Villanueva (46)
1-1   Phanuel Kavita (81)
Detroit City - - - 0-0 stats
24 May Miami FC 1 - 2

1-0   Francisco Bonfiglio (39)
---------------------------------------
     1-1   Tyler Pasher (48)
     1-2   Ronaldo Damus (74)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-0 stats
5 Jun Birmingham L. 0 - 1

     0-1   Cam Lindley (4)
Indy Eleven - - + 0-1 stats
15 Jun Louisville City 4 - 2

     0-1   Ronaldo Damus (15)
1-1   Amadou Dia (29)
2-1   Phillip Goodrum (30)
3-1   Phillip Goodrum (44)
---------------------------------------
4-1   Phillip Goodrum (58)
     4-2   Carlos Moguel (o.g.) (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 3-1 stats
19 Jun Birmingham L. 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Sebastian Tregarthen (90)
Sacramento R. - + - 0-0 stats
22 Jun Birmingham L. 0 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Kai Greene (54) pen.
Oakland Roots - - + 0-0 stats
3 Jul Birmingham L. 0 - 0

Charleston - + + 0-0 stats
5 Jul Rhode Island 1 - 1

     0-1   Ronaldo Damus (27)
1-1   Noah Fuson (44)
Birmingham L. - - - 1-1 stats
11 Jul North Carolina 2 - 3

1-0   Pedro Dolabella (40)
     1-1   Ronaldo Damus (45)
---------------------------------------
     1-2   Daniel Trejo (56)
     1-3   Daniel Trejo (63)
2-3   Evan Conway (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-1 stats
20 Jul Birmingham L. 0 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Marco Micaletto (83)
Colorado S. - - + 0-0 stats
3 Aug Phoenix Rising 3 - 3

1-0   Emil Cuello (16)
2-0   Hope Avayevu (25)
     2-1   Tyler Pasher (39)
---------------------------------------
     2-2   Sebastian Tregarthen (54)
     2-3   Enzo Martínez (64)
3-3   Charlie Dennis (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 2-1 stats
10 Aug Birmingham L. 1 - 4

     0-1   Dieng Mamadou (27) pen.
     0-2   Dieng Mamadou (28)
---------------------------------------
     0-3   Kyle Edwards (90)
     0-4   A. Obalola (90)
1-4   Enzo Martínez (90)
Hartford A. + - - 0-2 stats
24 Aug Birmingham L. 1 - 1

1-0   Ronaldo Damus (28)
---------------------------------------
     1-1   Augustine Williams (66)
Pittsburgh - - - 1-0 stats
31 Aug Orange County 4 - 4

     0-1   A. Daley (3)
1-1   Ashton Miles (24)
     1-2   Ronaldo Damus (28)
2-2   Ethan Zubak (43) pen.
---------------------------------------
     2-3   Vuk Latinovich (o.g.) (52)
3-3   Pedro Guimaraes (54)
     3-4   Sebastian Tregarthen (62)
4-4   Christopher Hegardt (66)
Birmingham L. + - - 2-2 stats



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
7 Sep FC Tulsa h2h Birmingham L. 2.09 1.10
17 Sep Birmingham L. h2h Tampa Bay 0.83 0.83
21 Sep Indy Eleven h2h Birmingham L. 1.25 1.10
28 Sep San Antonio h2h Birmingham L. 1.45 1.10
2 Oct Birmingham L. h2h North Carolina 0.83 1.30
4 Oct Loudoun Utd h2h Birmingham L. 2.09 1.10
19 Oct Birmingham L. h2h Miami FC 0.83 0.80
25 Oct Charleston h2h Birmingham L. 2.70 1.10
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.56

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins ---
Consecutive draws 122
Consecutive defeats ---
No win 525
No draw ---
No defeat 142
1 goal scored or more 274
1 goal conceded or more 3107
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded ---
GF+GA over 2.5 -31
GF+GA under 2.5 1--
Scored at least twice -31










Comparison with league average


Birmingham L. (22 matches) vs league average

(overall)Birmingham L. League AVG
Points per game  0.95 1.37
% Wins  18% 37%
% Draws  41% 26%
% Defeats  41% 37%
Goals scored per game  1.27 1.36
Goals conceded per game  1.68 1.36
% Clean sheets  9% 26%
% Failed To Score  32% 26%
% Won To Nil  5% 18%
% Lost To Nil  27% 18%
% Team scored first  27% 46%
% Opponent scored first  68% 46%
Average minute scored first  28 31
Average minute conceded first  35 31
Lead-defending rate  29% 58%
Equalizing rate  50% 42%
% Time leading  12% 25%
% Time level in goals  55% 50%
% Time trailing  33% 25%
PPG when scored first  1.00 2.15
PPG when conceded first  0.93 0.65
Total goals per game  2.95 2.72
% over 1.5 goals  68% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  45% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  41% 28%
% both teams scored  64% 56%

Birmingham L. at home (12 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Birmingham L. League AVG
Points per game  0.83 1.60
% Wins  17% 45%
% Draws  33% 26%
% Defeats  50% 29%
Goals scored per game  0.75 1.53
Goals conceded per game  1.25 1.19
% Clean sheets  17% 31%
% Failed To Score  42% 20%
% Won To Nil  8% 24%
% Lost To Nil  33% 13%
% Team scored first  25% 52%
% Opponent scored first  67% 41%
Average minute scored first  40 32
Average minute conceded first  36 31
Lead-defending rate  50% 65%
Equalizing rate  33% 50%
% Time leading  6% 29%
% Time level in goals  58% 50%
% Time trailing  35% 21%
PPG when scored first  1.33 2.32
PPG when conceded first  0.63 0.81
Total goals per game  2.00 2.72
% over 1.5 goals  50% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  25% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  25% 28%
% both teams scored  50% 56%

Birmingham L. away (10 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Birmingham L. League AVG
Points per game  1.10 1.14
% Wins  20% 29%
% Draws  50% 26%
% Defeats  30% 45%
Goals scored per game  1.90 1.19
Goals conceded per game  2.20 1.53
% Clean sheets  0% 20%
% Failed To Score  20% 31%
% Won To Nil  0% 13%
% Lost To Nil  20% 24%
% Team scored first  30% 41%
% Opponent scored first  70% 52%
Average minute scored first  15 31
Average minute conceded first  35 32
Lead-defending rate  20% 50%
Equalizing rate  67% 35%
% Time leading  18% 21%
% Time level in goals  50% 50%
% Time trailing  31% 29%
PPG when scored first  0.67 1.94
PPG when conceded first  1.29 0.52
Total goals per game  4.10 2.72
% over 1.5 goals  90% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  70% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  60% 28%
% both teams scored  80% 56%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Birmingham L.
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 6 / 22 27%
  Opponent scored first 15 / 22 68%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 1 / 22 5%
  Opponent was leading at HT 10 / 22 45%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 10.6 min. 12%
  Average minutes level in goals 49.3 min. 55%
  Average minutes trailing 30.1 min. 33%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Birmingham L. have been in the lead for an average duration of 10.6 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 30.1 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 22

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 14
  Equalizer goals conceded 10
  Lead defending rate * (1) 29%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 18
  Equalizer goals scored 9
  Equalizing rate * (2) 50%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 5
  Non-crucial goals conceded 9

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Birmingham L. have taken the lead 14 times and have conceded an equalizer on 10 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 29% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 71%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 18 times that Birmingham L.'s opponents have taken the lead, Birmingham L. have managed to score an equalizer on 9 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 50%.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 3 / 12 25%
  Opponent scored first 8 / 12 67%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 1 / 12 8%
  Opponent was leading at HT 4 / 12 33%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 5.8 min. 6%
  Average minutes level in goals 52.6 min. 58%
  Average minutes trailing 31.6 min. 35%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Birmingham L. have been in the lead for an average duration of 5.8 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 31.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 12

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 4
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 50%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 9
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 33%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 2
  Non-crucial goals conceded 4

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Birmingham L. have taken the lead 4 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 9 times that Birmingham L.'s opponents have taken the lead when Birmingham L. were playing at home, Birmingham L. have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 33%.



 flag Birmingham L.
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 3 / 10 30%
  Opponent scored first 7 / 10 70%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 0 / 10 0%
  Opponent was leading at HT 6 / 10 60%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 16.3 min. 18%
  Average minutes level in goals 45.4 min. 50%
  Average minutes trailing 28.3 min. 31%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Birmingham L. have been in the lead for an average duration of 16.3 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 28.3 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 10

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 10
  Equalizer goals conceded 8
  Lead defending rate * (1) 20%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 9
  Equalizer goals scored 6
  Equalizing rate * (2) 67%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 3
  Non-crucial goals conceded 5

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Birmingham L. have taken the lead 10 times and have conceded an equalizer on 8 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 20% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 80%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 9 times that Birmingham L.'s opponents have taken the lead when Birmingham L. were playing away, Birmingham L. have managed to score an equalizer on 6 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 67%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Louisville City 22 51 1 - 1 4 - 2 h2h
2 Charleston 22 47 0 - 0 25 Oct h2h
3 FC Tulsa 22 42   7 Sep h2h
4 Sacramento R. 21 34 1 - 0   h2h
5 Loudoun Utd 22 34 1 - 3 4 Oct h2h
6 North Carolina 21 33 2 Oct 2 - 3 h2h
7 El Paso 21 32 3 - 1   h2h
8 San Antonio 21 30   28 Sep h2h
9 Hartford A. 21 29 1 - 4 1 - 0 h2h
10 Detroit City 22 29 1 - 1 2 - 2 h2h
11 Phoenix Rising 22 29   3 - 3 h2h
12 Orange County 20 28   4 - 4 h2h
13 Pittsburgh 22 28 1 - 1 2 - 0 h2h
14 Lexington 22 28     h2h
15 Colorado S. 21 27 0 - 1   h2h
16 New Mexico 20 27     h2h
17 Oakland Roots 21 24 0 - 1   h2h
18 Monterey Bay 23 24     h2h
19 Rhode Island 22 24 0 - 1 1 - 1 h2h
20 Indy Eleven 21 23 0 - 1 21 Sep h2h
21 Las Vegas L. 22 23     h2h
22 Tampa Bay 21 21 17 Sep 2 - 2 h2h
23 Birmingham L. 22 21
24 Miami FC 22 20 19 Oct 1 - 2 h2h








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 9 1928
GF per match 0.751.90 1.27
Goals conceded (GA) 152237
GA per match 1.252.20 1.68
GF + GA per match 2.004.102.95
GF+GA over 0.5 92%100%95%
GF+GA over 1.5 50%90%68%
GF+GA over 2.5 25%70%45%
GF+GA over 3.5 25%60%41%
GF+GA over 4.5 8%40%23%
GF+GA over 5.5 0%30%14%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 58%90%73%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 33%60%45%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 8%40%23%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 17%0%9%
Won-to-nil 8%0%5%
Failed to score 42%20%32%
Lost-to-nil 33%20%27%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 58%80%68%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 33%60%45%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 33%70%50%
Scored in both halves 8%50%27%
Both teams scored 50%80%64%
Conceding Rate 83%100%91%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 50%90%68%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 50%70%59%
Conceded in both halves 17%60%36%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 58%80%68%
GF over 1.5 8%70%36%
GF over 2.5 8%30%18%
GF over 3.5 0%10%5%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 83%100%91%
GA over 1.5 17%70%41%
GA over 2.5 17%30%23%
GA over 3.5 8%20%14%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Birmingham L. matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 8%0%5%
Match total goals = 1 42%10%27%
Match total goals = 2 25%20%23%
Match total goals = 3 0%10%5%
Match total goals = 4 17%20%18%
Match total goals = 5+ 8%40%23%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 50%10%32%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 25%30%27%
Match total goals = 4+ 25%60%41%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  11 00
Away wins  20 00
Home & Away wins  31 00
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  41 10
Away defeats  12 00
Home & Away defeats  53 10

A majority of Birmingham L.'s wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (3 wins), while 1 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more.

A majority of Birmingham L.'s defeats had a one-goal margin (5 defeats), while 4 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 48%
52%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)0.83
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)1.10
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 32%
68%
  % Goals conceded 41%
59%
  League average 56%
44%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 10 1  5%
Drawing at HT 74 11  50%
Losing at HT 46 10  45%
  Total 121022







Goal times


 flag Birmingham L.
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 3
GA 3
16-30 GF 5
GA 11
31-45 GF 3
GA 8
46-60 GF 4
GA 5
61-75 GF 6
GA 4
76-90 GF 7
GA 6
1st Half GF 11
39%
GA 22
59%
2nd Half GF 17
61%
GA 15
41%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 53
 Avg. minute goals conceded 46


  Birmingham L.
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 1
GA 3
16-30 GF 2
GA 4
31-45 GF 1
GA 1
46-60 GF 0
GA 3
61-75 GF 1
GA 1
76-90 GF 4
GA 3
1st Half GF 4
44%
GA 8
53%
2nd Half GF 5
56%
GA 7
47%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 57
  Avg. minute goals conceded 43


  Birmingham L.
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 2
GA 0
16-30 GF 3
GA 7
31-45 GF 2
GA 7
46-60 GF 4
GA 2
61-75 GF 5
GA 3
76-90 GF 3
GA 3
1st Half GF 7
37%
GA 14
64%
2nd Half GF 12
63%
GA 8
36%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 51
  Avg. minute goals conceded 47








Birmingham L. scores

FT at home
0-1 4 33%
1-1 3 25%
1-4 1 8%
1-3 1 8%
3-1 1 8%
1-0 1 8%
0-0 1 8%
FT away
2-2 2 20%
4-4 1 10%
3-3 1 10%
2-3 1 10%
4-2 1 10%
1-2 1 10%
1-1 1 10%
2-0 1 10%
1-0 1 10%
The Birmingham L. score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 0-1 so far (4 times). The Birmingham L. score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 2-2 so far (2 times).
Half-time at home
0-0 5 42%
1-1 2 17%
0-1 2 17%
1-2 1 8%
0-2 1 8%
1-0 1 8%
Half-time away
1-0 3 30%
2-1 2 20%
1-1 2 20%
2-2 1 10%
3-1 1 10%
0-0 1 10%





This season in the league
Birmingham L. failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 7 matches. Birmingham L. conceded at least one goal in 10 of their 12 home matches. Birmingham L. have failed to score in 5 of their 12 home matches. Birmingham L. conceded at least one goal in each of their 10 away matches. Birmingham L. have scored in 8 of their 10 away matches. Birmingham L. have scored 68% of their goals away. Birmingham L. have failed to win in their last 5 home matches. Birmingham L. have been undefeated in their last 4 away matches. Birmingham L. have scored in each of their last 7 away matches. Birmingham L. failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 10 away matches. Birmingham L. have scored 2 goals or more in each of their last 3 away matches.


 flag

Colorado Springs

 (this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 9 4 2 3  
  Away 12 3 4 5  
  Total 21 7 6 8  
PPG (Home): 1.56
PPG (Away): 1.08
PPG (Total): 1.29

Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game1.29 1.50 +16.3%
AVG Goals For1.29 1.25 -3.1%
AVG Goals Against1.38 1.25 -9.4%



Colorado S.'s progression (home & away)
Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
9 Mar El Paso 2 - 2

     0-1   Marco Micaletto (2) pen.
1-1   Amando Moreno (43)
---------------------------------------
     1-2   Jonas Fjellberg (74)
2-2   Wilmer Cabrera (90)
Colorado S. + - - 1-1 stats
15 Mar Colorado S. 1 - 2

---------------------------------------
1-0   Juan Tejada (47)
     1-1   Darren Smith (62)
     1-2   Christian Herrera (o.g.) (81)
Detroit City + - - 0-0 stats
23 Mar Sacramento R. 2 - 2

1-0   Jack Gurr (24)
---------------------------------------
2-0   Russell Cicerone (74)
     2-1   Justin Dhillon (86) pen.
     2-2   Justin Dhillon (90) pen.
Colorado S. + - - 1-0 stats
29 Mar Indy Eleven 2 - 3

1-0   Maalique Foster (19)
     1-1   Marco Micaletto (43)
---------------------------------------
     1-2   Marco Micaletto (62)
     1-3   Justin Dhillon (64)
2-3   Aodhan Quinn (90)
Colorado S. + - - 1-1 stats
13 Apr Monterey Bay 2 - 1

1-0   Adrian Rebollar (36)
     1-1   Justin Dhillon (42)
---------------------------------------
2-1   Mayele Malango (83)
Colorado S. + - - 1-1 stats
20 Apr Colorado S. 1 - 1

1-0   Herbert Endeley (12)
     1-1   Robert Coronado (13)
El Paso - - - 1-1 stats
24 Apr San Antonio 3 - 2

     0-1   Matthew Real (21)
     0-2   Justin Dhillon (42)
---------------------------------------
1-2   Jorge Hernandez (51)
2-2   Mohamed Omar (58)
3-2   Alex Greive (64)
Colorado S. + - - 0-2 stats
4 May Colorado S. 1 - 1

     0-1   Jearl Margaritha (11)
---------------------------------------
1-1   Anthony Fontana (58)
Phoenix Rising - - - 0-1 stats
11 May Las Vegas L. 0 - 0

Colorado S. - + + 0-0 stats
18 May Colorado S. 1 - 0

1-0   Matthew Mahoney (12)
Pittsburgh - + - 1-0 stats
25 May Orange County 3 - 1

1-0   Christopher Hegardt (28)
---------------------------------------
2-0   Cameron Dunbar (61)
     2-1   Anthony Fontana (66)
3-1   Mouhamadou War (90)
Colorado S. + - - 1-0 stats
8 Jun New Mexico 1 - 1

1-0   Marlon Vargas (21)
     1-1   Kalen Ryden (o.g.) (40)
Colorado S. - - - 1-1 stats
15 Jun Colorado S. 1 - 0

1-0   Marco Micaletto (39)
Oakland Roots - + - 1-0 stats
20 Jun Lexington 2 - 1

1-0   F. Ajago (13)
---------------------------------------
2-0   Tyler Clegg (o.g.) (57)
     2-1   Matthew Mahoney (74)
Colorado S. + - - 1-0 stats
5 Jul Colorado S. 0 - 1

     0-1   Phillip Goodrum (9)
Louisville City - - + 0-1 stats
20 Jul Birmingham L. 0 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Marco Micaletto (83)
Colorado S. - + - 0-0 stats
2 Aug Colorado S. 3 - 1

1-0   Quenzi Huerman (30)
2-0   Matthew Mahoney (40)
---------------------------------------
     2-1   Alfredo Midence (77)
3-1   Matthew Mahoney (79)
Lexington + - - 2-0 stats
10 Aug Oakland Roots 1 - 2

     0-1   Jonas Fjellberg (43)
---------------------------------------
     0-2   Quenzi Huerman (49)
1-2   Peter Wilson (59)
Colorado S. + - - 0-1 stats
17 Aug Colorado S. 0 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Nico Benalcazar (62)
Orange County - - + 0-0 stats
24 Aug Phoenix Rising 4 - 1

1-0   Remi Cabral (6)
2-0   Pierce Rizzo (11)
     2-1   Zachary Zandi (16)
3-1   Hope Avayevu (26)
---------------------------------------
4-1   Ryan Flood (78)
Colorado S. + - - 3-1 stats
31 Aug Colorado S. 2 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Quenzi Huerman (58)
2-0   C. Mrowka (90)
FC Tulsa - + - 0-0 stats



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
7 Sep Colorado S. h2h Monterey Bay 1.56 0.54
13 Sep Tampa Bay h2h Colorado S. 1.22 1.08
21 Sep Colorado S. h2h Sacramento R. 1.56 1.60
25 Sep Colorado S. h2h New Mexico 1.56 1.18
28 Sep Colorado S. h2h Hartford A. 1.56 1.22
5 Oct Colorado S. h2h San Antonio 1.56 1.40
11 Oct Charleston h2h Colorado S. 2.70 1.08
19 Oct Colorado S. h2h Las Vegas L. 1.56 0.67
26 Oct FC Tulsa h2h Colorado S. 2.09 1.08
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.40

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins 1-1
Consecutive draws ---
Consecutive defeats -1-
No win -1-
No draw 649
No defeat 1-1
1 goal scored or more 162
1 goal conceded or more -2-
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded 1-1
GF+GA over 2.5 -2-
GF+GA under 2.5 2-1
Scored at least twice 1-1










Comparison with league average


Colorado S. (21 matches) vs league average

(overall)Colorado S. League AVG
Points per game  1.29 1.37
% Wins  33% 37%
% Draws  29% 26%
% Defeats  38% 37%
Goals scored per game  1.29 1.36
Goals conceded per game  1.38 1.36
% Clean sheets  24% 26%
% Failed To Score  14% 26%
% Won To Nil  19% 18%
% Lost To Nil  10% 18%
% Team scored first  48% 46%
% Opponent scored first  48% 46%
Average minute scored first  35 31
Average minute conceded first  23 31
Lead-defending rate  58% 58%
Equalizing rate  38% 42%
% Time leading  22% 25%
% Time level in goals  50% 50%
% Time trailing  28% 25%
PPG when scored first  2.00 2.15
PPG when conceded first  0.60 0.65
Total goals per game  2.67 2.72
% over 1.5 goals  71% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  52% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  33% 28%
% both teams scored  67% 56%

Colorado S. at home (9 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Colorado S. League AVG
Points per game  1.56 1.60
% Wins  44% 45%
% Draws  22% 26%
% Defeats  33% 29%
Goals scored per game  1.11 1.53
Goals conceded per game  0.78 1.19
% Clean sheets  33% 31%
% Failed To Score  22% 20%
% Won To Nil  33% 24%
% Lost To Nil  22% 13%
% Team scored first  67% 52%
% Opponent scored first  33% 41%
Average minute scored first  33 32
Average minute conceded first  27 31
Lead-defending rate  67% 65%
Equalizing rate  25% 50%
% Time leading  29% 29%
% Time level in goals  50% 50%
% Time trailing  20% 21%
PPG when scored first  2.17 2.32
PPG when conceded first  0.33 0.81
Total goals per game  1.89 2.72
% over 1.5 goals  56% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  22% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  11% 28%
% both teams scored  44% 56%

Colorado S. away (12 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Colorado S. League AVG
Points per game  1.08 1.14
% Wins  25% 29%
% Draws  33% 26%
% Defeats  42% 45%
Goals scored per game  1.42 1.19
Goals conceded per game  1.83 1.53
% Clean sheets  17% 20%
% Failed To Score  8% 31%
% Won To Nil  8% 13%
% Lost To Nil  0% 24%
% Team scored first  33% 41%
% Opponent scored first  58% 52%
Average minute scored first  37 31
Average minute conceded first  21 32
Lead-defending rate  50% 50%
Equalizing rate  44% 35%
% Time leading  16% 21%
% Time level in goals  49% 50%
% Time trailing  34% 29%
PPG when scored first  1.75 1.94
PPG when conceded first  0.71 0.52
Total goals per game  3.25 2.72
% over 1.5 goals  83% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  75% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  50% 28%
% both teams scored  83% 56%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Colorado S.
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 10 / 21 48%
  Opponent scored first 10 / 21 48%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 5 / 21 24%
  Opponent was leading at HT 6 / 21 29%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 19.7 min. 22%
  Average minutes level in goals 44.8 min. 50%
  Average minutes trailing 25.5 min. 28%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Colorado Springs have been in the lead for an average duration of 19.7 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 25.5 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Colorado S.
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 21

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 12
  Equalizer goals conceded 5
  Lead defending rate * (1) 58%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 13
  Equalizer goals scored 5
  Equalizing rate * (2) 38%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 10
  Non-crucial goals conceded 11

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Colorado Springs have taken the lead 12 times and have conceded an equalizer on 5 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 58% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 42%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 13 times that Colorado S.'s opponents have taken the lead, Colorado S. have managed to score an equalizer on 5 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 38%.


 flag Colorado S.
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 6 / 9 67%
  Opponent scored first 3 / 9 33%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 3 / 9 33%
  Opponent was leading at HT 2 / 9 22%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 26.3 min. 29%
  Average minutes level in goals 45.3 min. 50%
  Average minutes trailing 18.3 min. 20%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Colorado S. have been in the lead for an average duration of 26.3 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 18.3 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Colorado S.
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 9

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 6
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 67%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 4
  Equalizer goals scored 1
  Equalizing rate * (2) 25%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 3
  Non-crucial goals conceded 1

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Colorado S. have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 67% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 33%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 4 times that Colorado S.'s opponents have taken the lead when Colorado S. were playing at home, Colorado S. have managed to score an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a home equalizing rate of 25%.



 flag Colorado S.
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 4 / 12 33%
  Opponent scored first 7 / 12 58%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 2 / 12 17%
  Opponent was leading at HT 4 / 12 33%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 14.7 min. 16%
  Average minutes level in goals 44.4 min. 49%
  Average minutes trailing 30.9 min. 34%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Colorado S. have been in the lead for an average duration of 14.7 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 30.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Colorado S.
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 12

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 6
  Equalizer goals conceded 3
  Lead defending rate * (1) 50%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 9
  Equalizer goals scored 4
  Equalizing rate * (2) 44%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 7
  Non-crucial goals conceded 10

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Colorado S. have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 9 times that Colorado S.'s opponents have taken the lead when Colorado S. were playing away, Colorado S. have managed to score an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 44%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Louisville City 22 51 0 - 1   h2h
2 Charleston 22 47   11 Oct h2h
3 FC Tulsa 22 42 2 - 0 26 Oct h2h
4 Sacramento R. 21 34 21 Sep 2 - 2 h2h
5 Loudoun Utd 22 34     h2h
6 North Carolina 21 33     h2h
7 El Paso 21 32 1 - 1 2 - 2 h2h
8 San Antonio 21 30 5 Oct 3 - 2 h2h
9 Hartford A. 21 29 28 Sep   h2h
10 Detroit City 22 29 1 - 2   h2h
11 Phoenix Rising 22 29 1 - 1 4 - 1 h2h
12 Orange County 20 28 0 - 1 3 - 1 h2h
13 Pittsburgh 22 28 1 - 0   h2h
14 Lexington 22 28 3 - 1 2 - 1 h2h
15 Colorado S. 21 27
16 New Mexico 20 27 25 Sep 1 - 1 h2h
17 Oakland Roots 21 24 1 - 0 1 - 2 h2h
18 Monterey Bay 23 24 7 Sep 2 - 1 h2h
19 Rhode Island 22 24     h2h
20 Indy Eleven 21 23   2 - 3 h2h
21 Las Vegas L. 22 23 19 Oct 0 - 0 h2h
22 Tampa Bay 21 21   13 Sep h2h
23 Birmingham L. 22 21   0 - 1 h2h
24 Miami FC 22 20     h2h








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 10 1727
GF per match 1.111.42 1.29
Goals conceded (GA) 72229
GA per match 0.781.83 1.38
GF + GA per match 1.893.252.67
GF+GA over 0.5 100%92%95%
GF+GA over 1.5 56%83%71%
GF+GA over 2.5 22%75%52%
GF+GA over 3.5 11%50%33%
GF+GA over 4.5 0%25%14%
GF+GA over 5.5 0%0%0%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 67%83%76%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 22%50%38%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 0%8%5%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 33%17%24%
Won-to-nil 33%8%19%
Failed to score 22%8%14%
Lost-to-nil 22%0%10%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 78%92%86%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 44%58%52%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 44%58%52%
Scored in both halves 11%25%19%
Both teams scored 44%83%67%
Conceding Rate 67%83%76%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 33%67%52%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 33%75%57%
Conceded in both halves 0%58%33%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 78%92%86%
GF over 1.5 22%42%33%
GF over 2.5 11%8%10%
GF over 3.5 0%0%0%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 67%83%76%
GA over 1.5 11%67%43%
GA over 2.5 0%25%14%
GA over 3.5 0%8%5%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Colorado S. matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 0%8%5%
Match total goals = 1 44%8%24%
Match total goals = 2 33%8%19%
Match total goals = 3 11%25%19%
Match total goals = 4 11%25%19%
Match total goals = 5+ 0%25%14%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 44%17%29%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 44%33%38%
Match total goals = 4+ 11%50%33%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  22 00
Away wins  30 00
Home & Away wins  52 00
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  30 00
Away defeats  31 10
Home & Away defeats  61 10

A majority of Colorado S.'s wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (5 wins), while 2 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more.

A majority of Colorado S.'s defeats had a one-goal margin (6 defeats), while 2 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 52%
48%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.56
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)1.08
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 37%
63%
  % Goals conceded 24%
76%
  League average 56%
44%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 32 5  24%
Drawing at HT 46 10  48%
Losing at HT 24 6  29%
  Total 91221







Goal times


 flag Colorado S.
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 3
GA 6
16-30 GF 3
GA 5
31-45 GF 7
GA 2
46-60 GF 4
GA 4
61-75 GF 5
GA 5
76-90 GF 5
GA 7
1st Half GF 13
48%
GA 13
45%
2nd Half GF 14
52%
GA 16
55%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 50
 Avg. minute goals conceded 48


  Colorado S.
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 2
GA 3
16-30 GF 1
GA 0
31-45 GF 2
GA 0
46-60 GF 3
GA 0
61-75 GF 0
GA 2
76-90 GF 2
GA 2
1st Half GF 5
50%
GA 3
43%
2nd Half GF 5
50%
GA 4
57%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 46
  Avg. minute goals conceded 45


  Colorado S.
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 1
GA 3
16-30 GF 2
GA 5
31-45 GF 5
GA 2
46-60 GF 1
GA 4
61-75 GF 5
GA 3
76-90 GF 3
GA 5
1st Half GF 8
47%
GA 10
45%
2nd Half GF 9
53%
GA 12
55%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 53
  Avg. minute goals conceded 49








Colorado S. scores

FT at home
1-1 2 22%
0-1 2 22%
1-0 2 22%
1-2 1 11%
3-1 1 11%
2-0 1 11%
FT away
2-2 2 17%
2-1 2 17%
2-3 1 8%
3-2 1 8%
1-2 1 8%
4-1 1 8%
3-1 1 8%
1-1 1 8%
0-1 1 8%
0-0 1 8%

Half-time at home
0-0 3 33%
0-1 2 22%
1-0 2 22%
1-1 1 11%
2-0 1 11%
Half-time away
1-1 4 33%
1-0 3 25%
0-0 2 17%
0-2 1 8%
3-1 1 8%
0-1 1 8%





This season in the league
Colorado S. have scored in 11 of their 12 away matches. Colorado S. have scored 63% of their goals away. 76% of Colorado S.'s conceded goals were conceded away. 21% of Colorado S.'s conceded goals occurred in the first 15 minutes.








Tables overview

Points

GP pts
Louisville C. 22 51
Charleston 22 47
FC Tulsa 22 42
Sacramento R. 21 34
Loudoun Utd 22 34
North Caroli. 21 33
El Paso 21 32
San Antonio 21 30
Hartford A. 21 29
Detroit City 22 29
Phoenix Risi. 22 29
Orange County 20 28
Pittsburgh 22 28
Lexington 22 28
Colorado S. 21 27
New Mexico 20 27
Oakland Roots 21 24
Monterey Bay 23 24
Rhode Island 22 24
Indy Eleven 21 23
Las Vegas L. 22 23
Tampa Bay 21 21
Birmingham L. 22 21
Miami FC 22 20

Form (last 8)

GP pts
Louisville C. 8 20
Hartford A. 8 17
Sacramento R. 8 17
FC Tulsa 8 17
Charleston 8 16
Lexington 8 14
Oakland Roots 8 13
Tampa Bay 8 13
Orange County 8 12
El Paso 8 12
Colorado S. 8 12
North Caroli. 8 10
Detroit City 8 9
Phoenix Risi. 8 9
Indy Eleven 8 9
Loudoun Utd 8 9
San Antonio 8 9
Rhode Island 8 9
Pittsburgh 8 8
Birmingham L. 8 8
Monterey Bay 8 5
New Mexico 8 5
Las Vegas L. 8 5
Miami FC 8 3

Home

GP pts
Charleston 10 27
Louisville C. 11 27
Loudoun Utd 11 23
FC Tulsa 11 23
Pittsburgh 11 21
Orange County 10 20
North Caroli. 11 20
Lexington 11 19
El Paso 10 18
Sacramento R. 11 18
Hartford A. 12 18
Monterey Bay 10 17
Las Vegas L. 13 17
Detroit City 10 16
San Antonio 11 16
Indy Eleven 12 15
Colorado S. 9 14
New Mexico 9 14
Rhode Island 11 14
Phoenix Risi. 10 13
Miami FC 12 12
Tampa Bay 9 11
Oakland Roots 11 11
Birmingham L. 12 10

Away

GP pts
Louisville C. 11 24
Charleston 12 20
FC Tulsa 11 19
Sacramento R. 10 16
Phoenix Risi. 12 16
El Paso 11 14
San Antonio 10 14
Oakland Roots 10 13
North Caroli. 10 13
Detroit City 12 13
Colorado S. 12 13
New Mexico 11 13
Hartford A. 9 11
Birmingham L. 10 11
Loudoun Utd 11 11
Tampa Bay 12 10
Rhode Island 11 10
Lexington 11 9
Orange County 10 8
Indy Eleven 9 8
Miami FC 10 8
Pittsburgh 11 7
Monterey Bay 13 7
Las Vegas L. 9 6

Offence

GP GF
Charleston 22 45
Louisville C. 22 45
Phoenix Risi. 22 38
FC Tulsa 22 37
El Paso 21 36
Loudoun Utd 22 35
Indy Eleven 21 33
North Caroli. 21 33
Hartford A. 21 32
Orange County 20 32
Sacramento R. 21 31
Birmingham L. 22 28
Colorado S. 21 27
New Mexico 20 26
San Antonio 21 26
Detroit City 22 25
Oakland Roots 21 25
Tampa Bay 21 24
Lexington 22 23
Monterey Bay 23 23
Miami FC 22 22
Pittsburgh 22 21
Las Vegas L. 22 18
Rhode Island 22 16

Defence

GP GA
Sacramento R. 21 17
Louisville C. 22 18
Pittsburgh 22 21
Rhode Island 22 23
Charleston 22 23
Hartford A. 21 25
FC Tulsa 22 25
Detroit City 22 25
San Antonio 21 27
Lexington 22 28
Orange County 20 29
Colorado S. 21 29
North Caroli. 21 30
New Mexico 20 30
Monterey Bay 23 30
El Paso 21 30
Tampa Bay 21 32
Oakland Roots 21 32
Loudoun Utd 22 34
Miami FC 22 37
Birmingham L. 22 37
Las Vegas L. 22 39
Phoenix Risi. 22 40
Indy Eleven 21 40






Total Match Goals stats


Total match goals stats

Matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Phoenix Rising  22 3.55 100% 86% 64% 50% 32% 14% 77% 9% 14% 9% 14%
Indy Eleven  21 3.48 100% 76% 67% 62% 24% 10% 71% 19% 10% 19% 10%
El Paso  21 3.14 90% 81% 71% 33% 14% 14% 62% 24% 24% 14% 14%
Loudoun Utd  22 3.14 91% 86% 64% 41% 27% 5% 64% 18% 27% 9% 18%
Charleston  22 3.09 95% 82% 73% 36% 18% 5% 68% 23% 14% 18% 9%
Orange County  20 3.05 95% 75% 65% 35% 15% 10% 50% 20% 35% 15% 30%
North Carolina  21 3.00 100% 76% 62% 29% 24% 10% 71% 19% 10% 19% 10%
Birmingham L.  22 2.95 95% 68% 45% 41% 23% 14% 64% 9% 32% 5% 27%
Louisville City  22 2.86 91% 86% 50% 27% 23% 9% 68% 32% 9% 23% 0%
FC Tulsa  22 2.82 100% 73% 41% 27% 23% 9% 64% 27% 9% 27% 9%
New Mexico  20 2.80 95% 70% 60% 25% 15% 10% 45% 35% 25% 30% 20%
Hartford A.  21 2.71 90% 71% 48% 24% 19% 10% 43% 33% 33% 24% 24%
Oakland Roots  21 2.71 90% 71% 57% 19% 19% 14% 48% 33% 29% 24% 19%
Miami FC  22 2.68 95% 82% 55% 23% 9% 5% 64% 14% 27% 9% 23%
Colorado S.  21 2.67 95% 71% 52% 33% 14% 0% 67% 24% 14% 19% 10%
Tampa Bay  21 2.67 100% 81% 67% 19% 0% 0% 71% 5% 24% 5% 24%
Las Vegas L.  22 2.59 86% 59% 45% 32% 23% 9% 32% 41% 41% 27% 27%
San Antonio  21 2.52 86% 71% 52% 24% 14% 5% 57% 33% 24% 19% 10%
Lexington  22 2.32 86% 73% 41% 18% 9% 5% 55% 32% 27% 18% 14%
Monterey Bay  23 2.30 87% 70% 48% 17% 9% 0% 48% 17% 48% 4% 35%
Sacramento R.  21 2.29 90% 62% 38% 24% 10% 5% 38% 43% 29% 33% 19%
Detroit City  22 2.27 86% 77% 32% 23% 9% 0% 45% 36% 32% 23% 18%
Pittsburgh  22 1.91 91% 68% 27% 5% 0% 0% 45% 36% 27% 27% 18%
Rhode Island  22 1.77 86% 59% 27% 5% 0% 0% 23% 36% 55% 23% 41%
League average 92.6% 74.0% 51.9% 27.9% 15.5% 6.6% 55.8% 25.8% 25.8% 18.4% 18.4%

Total match goals stats (last 8 matches)

Last 8 matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
North Carolina  8 3.75 100% 88% 75% 50% 50% 12% 88% 0% 12% 0% 12%
Phoenix Rising  8 3.75 100% 88% 62% 50% 50% 25% 75% 0% 25% 0% 25%
Birmingham L.  8 3.63 88% 75% 50% 50% 50% 25% 75% 12% 25% 0% 12%
Indy Eleven  8 3.63 100% 75% 75% 62% 38% 12% 62% 25% 12% 25% 12%
Las Vegas L.  8 3.63 100% 88% 62% 50% 25% 25% 50% 12% 38% 12% 38%
Louisville City  8 3.50 88% 75% 62% 62% 50% 12% 75% 25% 12% 12% 0%
FC Tulsa  8 3.38 100% 88% 50% 38% 38% 12% 75% 12% 12% 12% 12%
New Mexico  8 3.38 88% 75% 62% 50% 25% 25% 50% 12% 50% 0% 38%
El Paso  8 3.25 88% 75% 75% 38% 25% 25% 50% 38% 25% 25% 12%
Loudoun Utd  8 3.13 75% 75% 62% 62% 38% 0% 62% 25% 38% 0% 12%
Miami FC  8 3.00 88% 88% 50% 38% 25% 12% 62% 12% 38% 0% 25%
Orange County  8 3.00 88% 62% 50% 38% 25% 12% 50% 38% 25% 25% 12%
Hartford A.  8 2.75 88% 75% 50% 38% 25% 0% 38% 50% 25% 38% 12%
Charleston  8 2.63 88% 62% 62% 25% 25% 0% 50% 38% 25% 25% 12%
Oakland Roots  8 2.63 100% 75% 50% 12% 12% 12% 50% 50% 0% 50% 0%
Colorado S.  8 2.50 100% 62% 50% 25% 12% 0% 50% 25% 25% 25% 25%
Monterey Bay  8 2.50 88% 62% 62% 25% 12% 0% 50% 12% 50% 0% 38%
Tampa Bay  8 2.50 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 0% 62% 12% 25% 12% 25%
Sacramento R.  8 2.38 88% 62% 38% 25% 12% 12% 25% 62% 25% 50% 12%
San Antonio  8 2.38 88% 62% 38% 25% 12% 12% 62% 25% 25% 12% 12%
Pittsburgh  8 2.25 88% 88% 38% 12% 0% 0% 75% 25% 12% 12% 0%
Lexington  8 1.75 88% 50% 25% 12% 0% 0% 38% 50% 25% 38% 12%
Detroit City  8 1.63 88% 62% 12% 0% 0% 0% 38% 38% 38% 25% 25%
Rhode Island  8 1.25 75% 38% 12% 0% 0% 0% 12% 50% 62% 25% 38%
League average 90.6% 71.9% 51.0% 33.9% 22.9% 9.9% 55.2% 27.1% 27.1% 17.7% 17.7%

Total match goals stats (at home)

Home matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Orange County  10 4.30 100% 100% 100% 60% 30% 20% 70% 10% 20% 10% 20%
El Paso  10 3.90 100% 90% 90% 50% 20% 20% 60% 30% 10% 30% 10%
Phoenix Rising  10 3.80 100% 80% 70% 70% 40% 20% 70% 10% 20% 10% 20%
Indy Eleven  12 3.67 100% 75% 75% 67% 25% 8% 67% 25% 8% 25% 8%
North Carolina  11 3.55 100% 91% 73% 36% 36% 18% 91% 9% 0% 9% 0%
Charleston  10 3.50 100% 90% 80% 40% 30% 10% 60% 40% 0% 40% 0%
Loudoun Utd  11 3.27 91% 91% 55% 45% 36% 9% 64% 27% 18% 18% 9%
Tampa Bay  9 3.22 100% 100% 89% 33% 0% 0% 89% 0% 11% 0% 11%
FC Tulsa  11 3.00 100% 64% 45% 27% 27% 18% 64% 27% 9% 27% 9%
Monterey Bay  10 3.00 90% 90% 70% 30% 20% 0% 80% 10% 20% 0% 10%
Louisville City  11 2.73 82% 82% 45% 27% 27% 9% 55% 45% 18% 27% 0%
Miami FC  12 2.67 92% 75% 58% 25% 8% 8% 67% 17% 25% 8% 17%
New Mexico  9 2.56 100% 67% 44% 22% 11% 11% 56% 33% 11% 33% 11%
San Antonio  11 2.55 100% 73% 55% 18% 9% 0% 55% 36% 9% 36% 9%
Sacramento R.  11 2.45 82% 64% 45% 27% 18% 9% 45% 45% 27% 27% 9%
Lexington  11 2.18 82% 82% 36% 9% 9% 0% 55% 36% 27% 18% 9%
Pittsburgh  11 2.18 100% 82% 27% 9% 0% 0% 45% 45% 9% 45% 9%
Hartford A.  12 2.08 92% 67% 42% 8% 0% 0% 33% 50% 25% 42% 17%
Las Vegas L.  13 2.08 92% 54% 31% 15% 15% 0% 38% 46% 23% 38% 15%
Birmingham L.  12 2.00 92% 50% 25% 25% 8% 0% 50% 17% 42% 8% 33%
Detroit City  10 2.00 80% 70% 30% 20% 0% 0% 40% 60% 20% 40% 0%
Oakland Roots  11 1.91 82% 64% 45% 0% 0% 0% 27% 45% 45% 27% 27%
Colorado S.  9 1.89 100% 56% 22% 11% 0% 0% 44% 33% 22% 33% 22%
Rhode Island  11 1.18 73% 36% 9% 0% 0% 0% 27% 45% 55% 18% 27%
League average 92.6% 74.0% 51.9% 27.9% 15.5% 6.6% 55.8% 31.4% 20.2% 24.0% 12.8%

Total match goals stats (away)

Away matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Birmingham L.  10 4.10 100% 90% 70% 60% 40% 30% 80% 0% 20% 0% 20%
Oakland Roots  10 3.60 100% 80% 70% 40% 40% 30% 70% 20% 10% 20% 10%
Hartford A.  9 3.56 89% 78% 56% 44% 44% 22% 56% 11% 44% 0% 33%
Las Vegas L.  9 3.33 78% 67% 67% 56% 33% 22% 22% 33% 67% 11% 44%
Phoenix Rising  12 3.33 100% 92% 58% 33% 25% 8% 83% 8% 8% 8% 8%
Colorado S.  12 3.25 92% 83% 75% 50% 25% 0% 83% 17% 8% 8% 0%
Indy Eleven  9 3.22 100% 78% 56% 56% 22% 11% 78% 11% 11% 11% 11%
Loudoun Utd  11 3.00 91% 82% 73% 36% 18% 0% 64% 9% 36% 0% 27%
Louisville City  11 3.00 100% 91% 55% 27% 18% 9% 82% 18% 0% 18% 0%
New Mexico  11 3.00 91% 73% 73% 27% 18% 9% 36% 36% 36% 27% 27%
Charleston  12 2.75 92% 75% 67% 33% 8% 0% 75% 8% 25% 0% 17%
Miami FC  10 2.70 100% 90% 50% 20% 10% 0% 60% 10% 30% 10% 30%
FC Tulsa  11 2.64 100% 82% 36% 27% 18% 0% 64% 27% 9% 27% 9%
Detroit City  12 2.50 92% 83% 33% 25% 17% 0% 50% 17% 42% 8% 33%
San Antonio  10 2.50 70% 70% 50% 30% 20% 10% 60% 30% 40% 0% 10%
El Paso  11 2.45 82% 73% 55% 18% 9% 9% 64% 18% 36% 0% 18%
Lexington  11 2.45 91% 64% 45% 27% 9% 9% 55% 27% 27% 18% 18%
North Carolina  10 2.40 100% 60% 50% 20% 10% 0% 50% 30% 20% 30% 20%
Rhode Island  11 2.36 100% 82% 45% 9% 0% 0% 18% 27% 55% 27% 55%
Tampa Bay  12 2.25 100% 67% 50% 8% 0% 0% 58% 8% 33% 8% 33%
Sacramento R.  10 2.10 100% 60% 30% 20% 0% 0% 30% 40% 30% 40% 30%
Orange County  10 1.80 90% 50% 30% 10% 0% 0% 30% 30% 50% 20% 40%
Monterey Bay  13 1.77 85% 54% 31% 8% 0% 0% 23% 23% 69% 8% 54%
Pittsburgh  11 1.64 82% 55% 27% 0% 0% 0% 45% 27% 45% 9% 27%
League average 92.6% 74.0% 51.9% 27.9% 15.5% 6.6% 55.8% 20.2% 31.4% 12.8% 24.0%




Segments Table

0 pt Segments table progression arrow 51 pts
5th Segment 4th Segment 3rd Segment 2nd Segment 1st Segment
up to 9.8 pts from 9.9 to 20.1 pts from 20.2 to 30.4 pts from 30.5 to 40.7 pts from 40.8 to 51 pts
(22)  20  Miami FC (21)  30  San Antonio
(21)  29  Hartford A.
(22)  29  Detroit City
(22)  29  Phoenix Rising
(20)  28  Orange County
(22)  28  Pittsburgh
(22)  28  Lexington
(21)  27  Colorado S.
(20)  27  New Mexico
(21)  24  Oakland Roots
(23)  24  Monterey Bay
(22)  24  Rhode Island
(21)  23  Indy Eleven
(22)  23  Las Vegas L.
(21)  21  Tampa Bay
(22)  21  Birmingham L. 		(21)  34  Sacramento R.
(22)  34  Loudoun Utd
(21)  33  North Carolina
(21)  32  El Paso 		(22)  51  Louisville City
(22)  47  Charleston
(22)  42  FC Tulsa

The Segments Table is a visual representation splitting the teams into 5 segments. Each team is assigned to a specific segment, depending on the team's number of points. Each of the 5 segments spans one-fifth (20%) of the total points held by the team ranked 1st in the league. For each team, the number of matches played appears in green between brackets, and the number of points is displayed in black.








Thu 4 Sep
HAR - IND 		Fri 5 Sep
LEX - NCA 		Sat 6 Sep
PHO - VEG 		Sun 7 Sep
DET - ORA 		Sun 7 Sep
RHO - LOU 		Sun 7 Sep
CHA - IND 		Sun 7 Sep
MIA - HAR 		Sun 7 Sep
TPB - SAC 		Sun 7 Sep
TUL - BIR 		Sun 7 Sep
SAN - NMX




League statistics

258 matches played / 360
71.7% completed
Home wins:  45%
Over 1.5 goals:  74%
Draws:  26%
Over 2.5 goals:  52%
Away wins:  29%
Over 3.5 goals:  28%
Goals:  701 Home goals per match:  1.53
Goals per match:  2.72 Away goals per match:  1.19
    Both teams scored:  56%

Results

 Latest results
 Matches by date
 Matches by Matchweek
 Results grid
 Results filter
 Outcome Surprise-Levels

Tables

 Home / Away tables
 Wide table
 Tables by Date
 Form tables
 Projected points

Analysis

 Goals statistics
 Points performance
 Over / Under
 Scored / Conceded
 Home advantage
 Relative form
 Run-in analysis

Goal times

 When goals were scored
 1st-half / 2nd-half
 First team to score
 Goal types
 Lead durations
 Points Won/Lost
Home team scored first: 52% No goal scored: 7% Away team scored first: 41%
Average minute when home team scored first: 32 min. Average minute when away team scored first: 31 min.
Home team lead-defending rate: 65% Away team lead-defending rate: 50%
Home team equalizing rate: 50% Away team equalizing rate: 35%
Home team lead duration: 29% Teams level in goals: 50% Away team lead duration: 21%
Home PPG when home team scored first: 2.32 Away PPG when away team scored first: 1.94

More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 258 matches played in the league, a total of 701 goals have been scored (2.72 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including the league results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded.

 

advertisement


 

SoccerSTATS.com - Public edition

SoccerSTATS.com provides football statistics, results and blog articles on national and international soccer competitions worldwide. Football fans can keep a tab on stats related to their favourite team or leagues of interest, and access a wide range of team performance data analytics and league standings, not only on the world's most famous professional leagues, but also on amateur and regional leagues over the world. Example of soccer statistics include league standings, form tables, top goal scorers, scoring stats, statistical previews and goal timing statistics.
Follow us on Twitter
F.A.Q. Contact Privacy Policy Change consent
Terms & conditions of use About us Cookie usage and options
Mobile app

Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. Products, services, promotional offers and other offerings from partners and advertisers are subject to terms and conditions. By using this website you certify that you agree with the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy and that you are over the age of 18 or that you have the permission of a parent or guardian to use this website, after your parent or guardian has carefully reviewed and agreed to the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy. The website's content is provided for informational purposes only is not to be relied upon as a professional opinion whatsover. Nothing on this website should be considered as advice. This website is not associated with nor endorsed by any league or competition (whether professional, collegiate or other types of leagues / competitions), federation, association, club or team. All trademarks, brands, images, logos and names appearing on this website belong to their respective owners.
Useful links (third-party websites):   www.gamcare.org.uk       www.begambleaware.org        gamblingtherapy.org
   
Copyright 1998-2025 SoccerSTATS.com
back to top