SoccerSTATS.com back to top
LEAGUES MATCHES STATS FAV BLOG LOGIN
usa2
USA - USL Championship
LATEST MATCHES FORM TABLES HEAD-TO-HEAD GOALS HALF-TIME TIMING FIRST GOAL FAVOURITE STATS
🔍

Hartford A. vs Birmingham L.

advertisement


Visual table

  GP Pts
1  Louisville City 21 48
2  Charleston 20 44
3  FC Tulsa 21 42
4  North Carolina 20 33
5  Sacramento R. 20 31
6  El Paso 20 31
7  Loudoun Utd 20 31
8  San Antonio 20 29
9  Pittsburgh 21 28
10  Detroit City 21 28
11  Phoenix Rising 21 28
12  Lexington 21 28
13  Orange County 19 27
14  New Mexico 19 27
15  Hartford A. 20 26
16  Colorado S. 20 24
17  Monterey Bay 22 24
18  Indy Eleven 20 23
19  Oakland Roots 20 21
20  Rhode Island 21 21
21  Birmingham L. 21 20
22  Miami FC 21 20
23  Las Vegas L. 21 20
24  Tampa Bay 20 18

 
Sat 19 Apr 2025
Hartford A.1 0Birmingham L.
Deshane Beckford (71) 1:0






Seasonal streaks


2nd consecutive away defeat for Birmingham L..
2nd consecutive home game where Hartford A. scored.
6th consecutive game where Birmingham L. conceded.
3rd consecutive away game where Birmingham L. conceded.
2nd consecutive away game with no goal scored for Birmingham L..
 

 
Lead durations in 90 minutes of regular time
090
Hartford A. (19)Level (71)Birmingham L.
Lead durations tables
  How are the duration values calculated?

To calculate the above duration values based on a total of 90 minutes, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are considered scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are considered scored on the 90th minute.






 






 flag

Hartford Athletic

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 12 5 3 4  
  Away 8 2 2 4  
  Total 20 7 5 8  
PPG (Home): 1.50
PPG (Away): 1.00
PPG (Total): 1.30

Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game1.30 2.13 +63.8%
AVG Goals For1.45 2.00 +37.9%
AVG Goals Against1.15 0.50 -56.5%



Hartford A.'s progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
9 Mar Lexington 2 - 0

1-0   Joe Hafferty (9)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Eliot Goldthorp (79)
Hartford A. - - + 1-0 stats
22 Mar Pittsburgh 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Danny Griffin (75)
Hartford A. - - + 0-0 stats
29 Mar Hartford A. 1 - 2

     0-1   Roberto Avila (10)

1-1   Dieng Mamadou (29)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   Wahab Ackwei (86)
El Paso + - - 1-1 stats
5 Apr Loudoun Utd 2 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Keegan Tingey (51)

2-0   Riley Bidois (90)
Hartford A. - - + 0-0 stats
19 Apr Hartford A. 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Deshane Beckford (71)
Birmingham L. - + - 0-0 stats
3 May Charleston 4 - 2

     0-1   Jordan Scarlett (5)

1-1   Cal Jennings (24) pen.

2-1   Juan Torres (38)

---------------------------------------
3-1   Houssou Landru (56)

     3-2   Michee Ngalina (62) pen.

4-2   Juan Torres (64)
Hartford A. + - - 2-1 stats
10 May Hartford A. 0 - 0

Detroit City - + + 0-0 stats
17 May Hartford A. 1 - 1

     0-1   Phillip Goodrum (39)

---------------------------------------
1-1   Kyle Edwards (88)
Louisville City - - - 0-1 stats
28 May Indy Eleven 4 - 4

1-0   Benjamin Ofeimu (14)

     1-1   Kyle Edwards (26) pen.

     1-2   Kyle Edwards (32)

     1-3   Jordan Scarlett (42)

2-3   Romario Williams (45)

---------------------------------------
     2-4   Dieng Mamadou (46)

3-4   Jack Blake (46)

4-4   Romario Williams (90)
Hartford A. + - - 2-3 stats
6 Jun Hartford A. 0 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Pedro Dolabella (90)
North Carolina - - + 0-0 stats
14 Jun Hartford A. 1 - 2

     0-1   Matt Myers (7)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Houssou Landru (50)

1-2   Thomas John Presthus (80)
Charleston + - - 0-1 stats
20 Jun Hartford A. 3 - 0

1-0   Dieng Mamadou (16)

2-0   Kyle Edwards (43) pen.

---------------------------------------
3-0   Kyle Edwards (56)
Loudoun Utd + + - 2-0 stats
12 Jul Detroit City 1 - 2

     0-1   Jonathan Jimenez (5)

     0-2   Dieng Mamadou (23)

1-2   Alasanne Ates Diouf (38)

Hartford A. + - - 1-2 stats
16 Jul Hartford A. 0 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Woobens Pacius (83)
Tampa Bay - - + 0-0 stats
19 Jul Rhode Island 0 - 0

Hartford A. - + + 0-0 stats
31 Jul Hartford A. 4 - 0

1-0   Dieng Mamadou (17)

2-0   Dieng Mamadou (24)

3-0   Michee Ngalina (26)

---------------------------------------
4-0   Kyle Edwards (82)
New Mexico + + - 3-0 stats
6 Aug Hartford A. 2 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Junior Moreira (46)

2-0   Dieng Mamadou (73) pen.
Miami FC - + - 0-0 stats
10 Aug Birmingham L. 1 - 4

     0-1   Dieng Mamadou (27) pen.

     0-2   Dieng Mamadou (28)

---------------------------------------
     0-3   Kyle Edwards (90)

     0-4   A. Obalola (90)

1-4   Enzo Martínez (90)
Hartford A. + - - 0-2 stats
16 Aug Hartford A. 1 - 1

     0-1   Joseph Farrell (o.g.) (45)

---------------------------------------
1-1   Kyle Edwards (46)
FC Tulsa - - - 0-1 stats
23 Aug Hartford A. 3 - 0

1-0   Samuel Careaga (5)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Kyle Edwards (73)

3-0   O. Presthus (89)
Rhode Island + + - 1-0 stats



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
30 Aug North Carolina h2h Hartford A. 2.00 1.00
3 Sep Hartford A. h2h Indy Eleven 1.50 0.89
6 Sep Miami FC h2h Hartford A. 1.00 1.00
14 Sep Monterey Bay h2h Hartford A. 1.70 1.00
20 Sep Hartford A. h2h Pittsburgh 1.50 0.70
28 Sep Colorado S. h2h Hartford A. 1.38 1.00
5 Oct Oakland Roots h2h Hartford A. 0.80 1.00
11 Oct Hartford A. h2h Sacramento R. 1.50 1.44
18 Oct Tampa Bay h2h Hartford A. 1.00 1.00
25 Oct Louisville City h2h Hartford A. 2.45 1.00
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.34

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins 111
Consecutive draws ---
Consecutive defeats ---
No win ---
No draw 111
No defeat 446
1 goal scored or more 415
1 goal conceded or more -1-
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded 1-1
GF+GA over 2.5 111
GF+GA under 2.5 ---
Scored at least twice 111










Comparison with league average


Hartford A. (20 matches) vs league average

(overall)Hartford A. League AVG
Points per game  1.30 1.37
% Wins  35% 37%
% Draws  25% 26%
% Defeats  40% 37%
Goals scored per game  1.45 1.34
Goals conceded per game  1.15 1.34
% Clean sheets  35% 26%
% Failed To Score  35% 26%
% Won To Nil  25% 18%
% Lost To Nil  25% 18%
% Team scored first  40% 46%
% Opponent scored first  50% 46%
Average minute scored first  24 32
Average minute conceded first  42 32
Lead-defending rate  78% 59%
Equalizing rate  33% 41%
% Time leading  29% 25%
% Time level in goals  51% 50%
% Time trailing  20% 25%
PPG when scored first  2.63 2.16
PPG when conceded first  0.30 0.65
Total goals per game  2.60 2.68
% over 1.5 goals  70% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  45% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  20% 27%
% both teams scored  40% 56%

Hartford A. at home (12 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Hartford A. League AVG
Points per game  1.50 1.59
% Wins  42% 44%
% Draws  25% 26%
% Defeats  33% 30%
Goals scored per game  1.42 1.51
Goals conceded per game  0.67 1.17
% Clean sheets  50% 31%
% Failed To Score  25% 21%
% Won To Nil  42% 24%
% Lost To Nil  17% 13%
% Team scored first  42% 51%
% Opponent scored first  50% 41%
Average minute scored first  31 32
Average minute conceded first  46 31
Lead-defending rate  100% 65%
Equalizing rate  43% 49%
% Time leading  27% 28%
% Time level in goals  58% 50%
% Time trailing  15% 21%
PPG when scored first  3.00 2.32
PPG when conceded first  0.33 0.80
Total goals per game  2.08 2.68
% over 1.5 goals  67% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  42% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  8% 27%
% both teams scored  33% 56%

Hartford A. away (8 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Hartford A. League AVG
Points per game  1.00 1.15
% Wins  25% 30%
% Draws  25% 26%
% Defeats  50% 44%
Goals scored per game  1.50 1.17
Goals conceded per game  1.88 1.51
% Clean sheets  12% 21%
% Failed To Score  50% 31%
% Won To Nil  0% 13%
% Lost To Nil  38% 24%
% Team scored first  38% 41%
% Opponent scored first  50% 51%
Average minute scored first  12 31
Average minute conceded first  37 32
Lead-defending rate  50% 51%
Equalizing rate  20% 35%
% Time leading  31% 21%
% Time level in goals  41% 50%
% Time trailing  28% 28%
PPG when scored first  2.00 1.96
PPG when conceded first  0.25 0.52
Total goals per game  3.38 2.68
% over 1.5 goals  75% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  50% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  38% 27%
% both teams scored  50% 56%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Hartford A.
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 8 / 20 40%
  Opponent scored first 10 / 20 50%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 6 / 20 30%
  Opponent was leading at HT 5 / 20 25%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 26.0 min. 29%
  Average minutes level in goals 45.9 min. 51%
  Average minutes trailing 18.1 min. 20%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Hartford Athletic have been in the lead for an average duration of 26.0 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 18.1 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Hartford A.
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 20

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 9
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 78%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 12
  Equalizer goals scored 4
  Equalizing rate * (2) 33%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 16
  Non-crucial goals conceded 9

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Hartford Athletic have taken the lead 9 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 78% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 22%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 12 times that Hartford A.'s opponents have taken the lead, Hartford A. have managed to score an equalizer on 4 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 33%.


 flag Hartford A.
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 5 / 12 42%
  Opponent scored first 6 / 12 50%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 3 / 12 25%
  Opponent was leading at HT 3 / 12 25%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 24.6 min. 27%
  Average minutes level in goals 51.8 min. 58%
  Average minutes trailing 13.6 min. 15%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Hartford A. have been in the lead for an average duration of 24.6 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 13.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Hartford A.
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 12

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 5
  Equalizer goals conceded 0
  Lead defending rate * (1) 100%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 7
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 43%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 9
  Non-crucial goals conceded 1

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Hartford A. have taken the lead 5 times and have conceded an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 100% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 0%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 7 times that Hartford A.'s opponents have taken the lead when Hartford A. were playing at home, Hartford A. have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 43%.



 flag Hartford A.
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 3 / 8 38%
  Opponent scored first 4 / 8 50%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 3 / 8 38%
  Opponent was leading at HT 2 / 8 25%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 28.1 min. 31%
  Average minutes level in goals 37.0 min. 41%
  Average minutes trailing 24.9 min. 28%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Hartford A. have been in the lead for an average duration of 28.1 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 24.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Hartford A.
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 8

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 4
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 50%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 5
  Equalizer goals scored 1
  Equalizing rate * (2) 20%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 7
  Non-crucial goals conceded 8

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Hartford A. have taken the lead 4 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 5 times that Hartford A.'s opponents have taken the lead when Hartford A. were playing away, Hartford A. have managed to score an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away equalizing rate of 20%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Louisville City 21 48 1 - 1 25 Oct h2h
2 Charleston 20 44 1 - 2 4 - 2 h2h
3 FC Tulsa 21 42 1 - 1   h2h
4 North Carolina 20 33 0 - 1 30 Aug h2h
5 Sacramento R. 20 31 11 Oct   h2h
6 El Paso 20 31 1 - 2   h2h
7 Loudoun Utd 20 31 3 - 0 2 - 0 h2h
8 San Antonio 20 29     h2h
9 Pittsburgh 21 28 20 Sep 1 - 0 h2h
10 Detroit City 21 28 0 - 0 1 - 2 h2h
11 Phoenix Rising 21 28     h2h
12 Lexington 21 28   2 - 0 h2h
13 Orange County 19 27     h2h
14 New Mexico 19 27 4 - 0   h2h
15 Hartford A. 20 26
16 Colorado S. 20 24   28 Sep h2h
17 Monterey Bay 22 24   14 Sep h2h
18 Indy Eleven 20 23 3 Sep 4 - 4 h2h
19 Oakland Roots 20 21   5 Oct h2h
20 Rhode Island 21 21 3 - 0 0 - 0 h2h
21 Birmingham L. 21 20 1 - 0 1 - 4 h2h
22 Miami FC 21 20 2 - 0 6 Sep h2h
23 Las Vegas L. 21 20     h2h
24 Tampa Bay 20 18 0 - 1 18 Oct h2h








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 17 1229
GF per match 1.421.50 1.45
Goals conceded (GA) 81523
GA per match 0.671.88 1.15
GF + GA per match 2.083.382.60
GF+GA over 0.5 92%88%90%
GF+GA over 1.5 67%75%70%
GF+GA over 2.5 42%50%45%
GF+GA over 3.5 8%38%20%
GF+GA over 4.5 0%38%15%
GF+GA over 5.5 0%25%10%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 58%62%60%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 25%50%35%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 8%38%20%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 50%12%35%
Won-to-nil 42%0%25%
Failed to score 25%50%35%
Lost-to-nil 17%38%25%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 75%50%65%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 33%50%40%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 67%38%55%
Scored in both halves 25%38%30%
Both teams scored 33%50%40%
Conceding Rate 50%88%65%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 33%50%40%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 33%75%50%
Conceded in both halves 17%38%25%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 75%50%65%
GF over 1.5 33%50%40%
GF over 2.5 25%25%25%
GF over 3.5 8%25%15%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 50%88%65%
GA over 1.5 17%50%30%
GA over 2.5 0%25%10%
GA over 3.5 0%25%10%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Hartford A. matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 8%12%10%
Match total goals = 1 25%12%20%
Match total goals = 2 25%25%25%
Match total goals = 3 33%12%25%
Match total goals = 4 8%0%5%
Match total goals = 5+ 0%38%15%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 33%25%30%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 58%38%50%
Match total goals = 4+ 8%38%20%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  11 21
Away wins  10 10
Home & Away wins  21 31
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  40 00
Away defeats  13 00
Home & Away defeats  53 00

A majority of Hartford A.'s wins have been obtained with a margin of 2 goals or more (5 wins), while 2 of their wins had a one-goal margin.

A majority of Hartford A.'s defeats had a one-goal margin (5 defeats), while 3 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 69%
31%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.50
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)1.00
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 59%
41%
  % Goals conceded 35%
65%
  League average 56%
44%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 33 6  30%
Drawing at HT 63 9  45%
Losing at HT 32 5  25%
  Total 12820







Goal times


 flag Hartford A.
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 3
GA 4
16-30 GF 9
GA 1
31-45 GF 3
GA 5
46-60 GF 4
GA 4
61-75 GF 4
GA 2
76-90 GF 6
GA 7
1st Half GF 15
52%
GA 10
43%
2nd Half GF 14
48%
GA 13
57%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 46
 Avg. minute goals conceded 53


  Hartford A.
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 1
GA 2
16-30 GF 5
GA 0
31-45 GF 1
GA 2
46-60 GF 3
GA 1
61-75 GF 3
GA 0
76-90 GF 4
GA 3
1st Half GF 7
41%
GA 4
50%
2nd Half GF 10
59%
GA 4
50%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 51
  Avg. minute goals conceded 51


  Hartford A.
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 2
GA 2
16-30 GF 4
GA 1
31-45 GF 2
GA 3
46-60 GF 1
GA 3
61-75 GF 1
GA 2
76-90 GF 2
GA 4
1st Half GF 8
67%
GA 6
40%
2nd Half GF 4
33%
GA 9
60%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 40
  Avg. minute goals conceded 54








Hartford A. scores

FT at home
1-2 2 17%
1-1 2 17%
0-1 2 17%
3-0 2 17%
4-0 1 8%
2-0 1 8%
1-0 1 8%
0-0 1 8%
FT away
2-0 2 25%
4-4 1 12%
1-4 1 12%
4-2 1 12%
1-2 1 12%
1-0 1 12%
0-0 1 12%
The Hartford A. score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 2-0 so far (2 times).
Half-time at home
0-0 5 42%
0-1 3 25%
1-1 1 8%
3-0 1 8%
2-0 1 8%
1-0 1 8%
Half-time away
0-0 3 38%
2-3 1 12%
1-2 1 12%
0-2 1 12%
2-1 1 12%
1-0 1 12%





This season in the league
Hartford A. have been undefeated in their last 6 matches. 69% of Hartford A.'s points have been earned at home. Hartford A. have been undefeated in their last 4 away matches.


 flag

Birmingham L.

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 12 2 4 6  
  Away 9 2 4 3  
  Total 21 4 8 9  
PPG (Home): 0.83
PPG (Away): 1.11
PPG (Total): 0.95

Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game0.95 0.88 -7.4%
AVG Goals For1.14 1.13 -0.9%
AVG Goals Against1.57 1.63 +3.8%



Birmingham L.'s progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
9 Mar Birmingham L. 1 - 3

1-0   Jacob Rufe (2)

     1-1   Jacob Erlandson (5)

     1-2   Abdellatif Aboukoura (33)

---------------------------------------
     1-3   Zach Ryan (50)
Loudoun Utd + - - 1-2 stats
16 Mar Birmingham L. 1 - 1

     0-1   Manny Perez (30)

1-1   Ronaldo Damus (45)

Louisville City - - - 1-1 stats
22 Mar Detroit City 2 - 2

1-0   Darren Smith (20)

     1-1   Ronaldo Damus (27)

2-1   Ben Morris (33)

---------------------------------------
     2-2   Stephen Carroll (o.g.) (80)
Birmingham L. + - - 2-1 stats
29 Mar Pittsburgh 2 - 0

1-0   Robbie Mertz (36)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Danny Griffin (70)
Birmingham L. - - + 1-0 stats
13 Apr Birmingham L. 3 - 1

     0-1   Wilmer Cabrera (26)

1-1   Ronaldo Damus (30)

---------------------------------------
2-1   Ronaldo Damus (61) pen.

3-1   Dawson McCartney (90)
El Paso + - - 1-1 stats
19 Apr Hartford A. 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Deshane Beckford (71)
Birmingham L. - - + 0-0 stats
3 May Tampa Bay 2 - 2

1-0   Leonardo Fernandes (26) pen.

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Enzo Martínez (70)

     1-2   Daniel Trejo (76)

2-2   P. Niyongabire (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-0 stats
15 May Birmingham L. 0 - 1

     0-1   Maxi Rodríguez (14)

Rhode Island - - + 0-1 stats
18 May Birmingham L. 1 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Alex Villanueva (46)

1-1   Phanuel Kavita (81)
Detroit City - - - 0-0 stats
24 May Miami FC 1 - 2

1-0   Francisco Bonfiglio (39)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Tyler Pasher (48)

     1-2   Ronaldo Damus (74)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-0 stats
5 Jun Birmingham L. 0 - 1

     0-1   Cam Lindley (4)

Indy Eleven - - + 0-1 stats
15 Jun Louisville City 4 - 2

     0-1   Ronaldo Damus (15)

1-1   Amadou Dia (29)

2-1   Phillip Goodrum (30)

3-1   Phillip Goodrum (44)

---------------------------------------
4-1   Phillip Goodrum (58)

     4-2   Carlos Moguel (o.g.) (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 3-1 stats
19 Jun Birmingham L. 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Sebastian Tregarthen (90)
Sacramento R. - + - 0-0 stats
22 Jun Birmingham L. 0 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Kai Greene (54) pen.
Oakland Roots - - + 0-0 stats
3 Jul Birmingham L. 0 - 0

Charleston - + + 0-0 stats
5 Jul Rhode Island 1 - 1

     0-1   Ronaldo Damus (27)

1-1   Noah Fuson (44)

Birmingham L. - - - 1-1 stats
11 Jul North Carolina 2 - 3

1-0   Pedro Dolabella (40)

     1-1   Ronaldo Damus (45)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   Daniel Trejo (56)

     1-3   Daniel Trejo (63)

2-3   Evan Conway (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-1 stats
20 Jul Birmingham L. 0 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Marco Micaletto (83)
Colorado S. - - + 0-0 stats
3 Aug Phoenix Rising 3 - 3

1-0   Emil Cuello (16)

2-0   Hope Avayevu (25)

     2-1   Tyler Pasher (39)

---------------------------------------
     2-2   Sebastian Tregarthen (54)

     2-3   Enzo Martínez (64)

3-3   Charlie Dennis (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 2-1 stats
10 Aug Birmingham L. 1 - 4

     0-1   Dieng Mamadou (27) pen.

     0-2   Dieng Mamadou (28)

---------------------------------------
     0-3   Kyle Edwards (90)

     0-4   A. Obalola (90)

1-4   Enzo Martínez (90)
Hartford A. + - - 0-2 stats
24 Aug Birmingham L. 1 - 1

1-0   Ronaldo Damus (28)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Augustine Williams (66)
Pittsburgh - - - 1-0 stats



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
31 Aug Orange County h2h Birmingham L. 2.11 1.11
7 Sep FC Tulsa h2h Birmingham L. 2.09 1.11
18 Sep Birmingham L. h2h Tampa Bay 0.83 0.83
21 Sep Indy Eleven h2h Birmingham L. 1.36 1.11
28 Sep San Antonio h2h Birmingham L. 1.45 1.11
2 Oct Birmingham L. h2h North Carolina 0.83 1.30
4 Oct Loudoun Utd h2h Birmingham L. 2.00 1.11
19 Oct Birmingham L. h2h Miami FC 0.83 0.89
25 Oct Charleston h2h Birmingham L. 2.67 1.11
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.63

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins ---
Consecutive draws 111
Consecutive defeats ---
No win 514
No draw ---
No defeat 131
1 goal scored or more 263
1 goal conceded or more 396
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded ---
GF+GA over 2.5 -2-
GF+GA under 2.5 1-1
Scored at least twice -2-










Comparison with league average


Birmingham L. (21 matches) vs league average

(overall)Birmingham L. League AVG
Points per game  0.95 1.37
% Wins  19% 37%
% Draws  38% 26%
% Defeats  43% 37%
Goals scored per game  1.14 1.34
Goals conceded per game  1.57 1.34
% Clean sheets  10% 26%
% Failed To Score  33% 26%
% Won To Nil  5% 18%
% Lost To Nil  29% 18%
% Team scored first  24% 46%
% Opponent scored first  71% 46%
Average minute scored first  32 32
Average minute conceded first  35 32
Lead-defending rate  40% 59%
Equalizing rate  50% 41%
% Time leading  10% 25%
% Time level in goals  55% 50%
% Time trailing  35% 25%
PPG when scored first  1.00 2.16
PPG when conceded first  0.93 0.65
Total goals per game  2.71 2.68
% over 1.5 goals  67% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  43% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  38% 27%
% both teams scored  62% 56%

Birmingham L. at home (12 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Birmingham L. League AVG
Points per game  0.83 1.59
% Wins  17% 44%
% Draws  33% 26%
% Defeats  50% 30%
Goals scored per game  0.75 1.51
Goals conceded per game  1.25 1.17
% Clean sheets  17% 31%
% Failed To Score  42% 21%
% Won To Nil  8% 24%
% Lost To Nil  33% 13%
% Team scored first  25% 51%
% Opponent scored first  67% 41%
Average minute scored first  40 32
Average minute conceded first  36 31
Lead-defending rate  50% 65%
Equalizing rate  33% 49%
% Time leading  6% 28%
% Time level in goals  58% 50%
% Time trailing  35% 21%
PPG when scored first  1.33 2.32
PPG when conceded first  0.63 0.80
Total goals per game  2.00 2.68
% over 1.5 goals  50% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  25% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  25% 27%
% both teams scored  50% 56%

Birmingham L. away (9 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Birmingham L. League AVG
Points per game  1.11 1.15
% Wins  22% 30%
% Draws  44% 26%
% Defeats  33% 44%
Goals scored per game  1.67 1.17
Goals conceded per game  2.00 1.51
% Clean sheets  0% 21%
% Failed To Score  22% 31%
% Won To Nil  0% 13%
% Lost To Nil  22% 24%
% Team scored first  22% 41%
% Opponent scored first  78% 51%
Average minute scored first  21 31
Average minute conceded first  35 32
Lead-defending rate  33% 51%
Equalizing rate  67% 35%
% Time leading  15% 21%
% Time level in goals  50% 50%
% Time trailing  35% 28%
PPG when scored first  0.50 1.96
PPG when conceded first  1.29 0.52
Total goals per game  3.67 2.68
% over 1.5 goals  89% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  67% 52%
% over 3.5 goals  56% 27%
% both teams scored  78% 56%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Birmingham L.
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 5 / 21 24%
  Opponent scored first 15 / 21 71%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 1 / 21 5%
  Opponent was leading at HT 10 / 21 48%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 9.1 min. 10%
  Average minutes level in goals 49.4 min. 55%
  Average minutes trailing 31.5 min. 35%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Birmingham L. have been in the lead for an average duration of 9.1 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 31.5 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 21

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 10
  Equalizer goals conceded 6
  Lead defending rate * (1) 40%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 18
  Equalizer goals scored 9
  Equalizing rate * (2) 50%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 5
  Non-crucial goals conceded 9

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Birmingham L. have taken the lead 10 times and have conceded an equalizer on 6 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 40% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 60%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 18 times that Birmingham L.'s opponents have taken the lead, Birmingham L. have managed to score an equalizer on 9 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 50%.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 3 / 12 25%
  Opponent scored first 8 / 12 67%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 1 / 12 8%
  Opponent was leading at HT 4 / 12 33%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 5.8 min. 6%
  Average minutes level in goals 52.6 min. 58%
  Average minutes trailing 31.6 min. 35%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Birmingham L. have been in the lead for an average duration of 5.8 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 31.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 12

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 4
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 50%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 9
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 33%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 2
  Non-crucial goals conceded 4

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Birmingham L. have taken the lead 4 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 9 times that Birmingham L.'s opponents have taken the lead when Birmingham L. were playing at home, Birmingham L. have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 33%.



 flag Birmingham L.
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 2 / 9 22%
  Opponent scored first 7 / 9 78%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 0 / 9 0%
  Opponent was leading at HT 6 / 9 67%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 13.4 min. 15%
  Average minutes level in goals 45.1 min. 50%
  Average minutes trailing 31.4 min. 35%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Birmingham L. have been in the lead for an average duration of 13.4 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 31.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 9

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 6
  Equalizer goals conceded 4
  Lead defending rate * (1) 33%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 9
  Equalizer goals scored 6
  Equalizing rate * (2) 67%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 3
  Non-crucial goals conceded 5

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Birmingham L. have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 33% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 67%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 9 times that Birmingham L.'s opponents have taken the lead when Birmingham L. were playing away, Birmingham L. have managed to score an equalizer on 6 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 67%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Louisville City 21 48 1 - 1 4 - 2 h2h
2 Charleston 20 44 0 - 0 25 Oct h2h
3 FC Tulsa 21 42   7 Sep h2h
4 North Carolina 20 33 2 Oct 2 - 3 h2h
5 Sacramento R. 20 31 1 - 0   h2h
6 El Paso 20 31 3 - 1   h2h
7 Loudoun Utd 20 31 1 - 3 4 Oct h2h
8 San Antonio 20 29   28 Sep h2h
9 Pittsburgh 21 28 1 - 1 2 - 0 h2h
10 Detroit City 21 28 1 - 1 2 - 2 h2h
11 Phoenix Rising 21 28   3 - 3 h2h
12 Lexington 21 28     h2h
13 Orange County 19 27   31 Aug h2h
14 New Mexico 19 27     h2h
15 Hartford A. 20 26 1 - 4 1 - 0 h2h
16 Colorado S. 20 24 0 - 1   h2h
17 Monterey Bay 22 24     h2h
18 Indy Eleven 20 23 0 - 1 21 Sep h2h
19 Oakland Roots 20 21 0 - 1   h2h
20 Rhode Island 21 21 0 - 1 1 - 1 h2h
21 Birmingham L. 21 20
22 Miami FC 21 20 19 Oct 1 - 2 h2h
23 Las Vegas L. 21 20     h2h
24 Tampa Bay 20 18 18 Sep 2 - 2 h2h








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 9 1524
GF per match 0.751.67 1.14
Goals conceded (GA) 151833
GA per match 1.252.00 1.57
GF + GA per match 2.003.672.71
GF+GA over 0.5 92%100%95%
GF+GA over 1.5 50%89%67%
GF+GA over 2.5 25%67%43%
GF+GA over 3.5 25%56%38%
GF+GA over 4.5 8%33%19%
GF+GA over 5.5 0%22%10%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 58%89%71%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 33%56%43%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 8%33%19%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 17%0%10%
Won-to-nil 8%0%5%
Failed to score 42%22%33%
Lost-to-nil 33%22%29%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 58%78%67%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 33%56%43%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 33%67%48%
Scored in both halves 8%44%24%
Both teams scored 50%78%62%
Conceding Rate 83%100%90%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 50%89%67%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 50%67%57%
Conceded in both halves 17%56%33%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 58%78%67%
GF over 1.5 8%67%33%
GF over 2.5 8%22%14%
GF over 3.5 0%0%0%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 83%100%90%
GA over 1.5 17%67%38%
GA over 2.5 17%22%19%
GA over 3.5 8%11%10%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Birmingham L. matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 8%0%5%
Match total goals = 1 42%11%29%
Match total goals = 2 25%22%24%
Match total goals = 3 0%11%5%
Match total goals = 4 17%22%19%
Match total goals = 5+ 8%33%19%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 50%11%33%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 25%33%29%
Match total goals = 4+ 25%56%38%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  11 00
Away wins  20 00
Home & Away wins  31 00
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  41 10
Away defeats  12 00
Home & Away defeats  53 10

A majority of Birmingham L.'s wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (3 wins), while 1 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more.

A majority of Birmingham L.'s defeats had a one-goal margin (5 defeats), while 4 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 50%
50%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)0.83
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)1.11
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 38%
62%
  % Goals conceded 45%
55%
  League average 56%
44%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 10 1  5%
Drawing at HT 73 10  48%
Losing at HT 46 10  48%
  Total 12921







Goal times


 flag Birmingham L.
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 2
GA 3
16-30 GF 4
GA 10
31-45 GF 3
GA 7
46-60 GF 3
GA 4
61-75 GF 5
GA 3
76-90 GF 7
GA 6
1st Half GF 9
38%
GA 20
61%
2nd Half GF 15
62%
GA 13
39%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 56
 Avg. minute goals conceded 45


  Birmingham L.
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 1
GA 3
16-30 GF 2
GA 4
31-45 GF 1
GA 1
46-60 GF 0
GA 3
61-75 GF 1
GA 1
76-90 GF 4
GA 3
1st Half GF 4
44%
GA 8
53%
2nd Half GF 5
56%
GA 7
47%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 57
  Avg. minute goals conceded 43


  Birmingham L.
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 1
GA 0
16-30 GF 2
GA 6
31-45 GF 2
GA 6
46-60 GF 3
GA 1
61-75 GF 4
GA 2
76-90 GF 3
GA 3
1st Half GF 5
33%
GA 12
67%
2nd Half GF 10
67%
GA 6
33%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 55
  Avg. minute goals conceded 47








Birmingham L. scores

FT at home
0-1 4 33%
1-1 3 25%
1-4 1 8%
1-3 1 8%
3-1 1 8%
1-0 1 8%
0-0 1 8%
FT away
2-2 2 22%
3-3 1 11%
2-3 1 11%
4-2 1 11%
1-2 1 11%
1-1 1 11%
2-0 1 11%
1-0 1 11%
The Birmingham L. score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 0-1 so far (4 times). The Birmingham L. score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 2-2 so far (2 times).
Half-time at home
0-0 5 42%
1-1 2 17%
0-1 2 17%
1-2 1 8%
0-2 1 8%
1-0 1 8%
Half-time away
1-0 3 33%
2-1 2 22%
1-1 2 22%
3-1 1 11%
0-0 1 11%





This season in the league
Birmingham L. conceded at least one goal in 10 of their 12 home matches. Birmingham L. have failed to score in 5 of their 12 home matches. Birmingham L. conceded at least one goal in each of their 9 away matches. Birmingham L. have scored in 7 of their 9 away matches. Birmingham L. have scored 62% of their goals away. 61% of Birmingham L.'s conceded goals occurred in the first half. Birmingham L. have conceded the opening goal in 15 of their 21 matches. Birmingham L. have failed to win in their last 5 home matches.








Tables overview

Points

GP pts
Louisville C. 21 48
Charleston 20 44
FC Tulsa 21 42
North Caroli. 20 33
Sacramento R. 20 31
El Paso 20 31
Loudoun Utd 20 31
San Antonio 20 29
Pittsburgh 21 28
Detroit City 21 28
Phoenix Risi. 21 28
Lexington 21 28
Orange County 19 27
New Mexico 19 27
Hartford A. 20 26
Colorado S. 20 24
Monterey Bay 22 24
Indy Eleven 20 23
Oakland Roots 20 21
Rhode Island 21 21
Birmingham L. 21 20
Miami FC 21 20
Las Vegas L. 21 20
Tampa Bay 20 18

Form (last 8)

GP pts
FC Tulsa 8 20
Hartford A. 8 17
Louisville C. 8 17
Sacramento R. 8 17
Lexington 8 17
Charleston 8 16
Orange County 8 14
North Caroli. 8 13
Colorado S. 8 12
Pittsburgh 8 11
El Paso 8 11
Detroit City 8 11
Oakland Roots 8 10
Tampa Bay 8 10
Indy Eleven 8 9
San Antonio 8 9
Phoenix Risi. 8 8
Birmingham L. 8 7
Rhode Island 8 6
Loudoun Utd 8 6
Monterey Bay 8 5
New Mexico 8 5
Las Vegas L. 8 5
Miami FC 8 4

Home

GP pts
Louisville C. 11 27
Charleston 9 24
FC Tulsa 11 23
Pittsburgh 11 21
North Caroli. 10 20
Loudoun Utd 10 20
Orange County 9 19
Lexington 11 19
El Paso 10 18
Sacramento R. 11 18
Hartford A. 12 18
Monterey Bay 10 17
San Antonio 11 16
Detroit City 9 15
Indy Eleven 11 15
New Mexico 8 14
Las Vegas L. 12 14
Phoenix Risi. 9 12
Miami FC 12 12
Colorado S. 8 11
Rhode Island 10 11
Birmingham L. 12 10
Tampa Bay 8 8
Oakland Roots 10 8

Away

GP pts
Louisville C. 10 21
Charleston 11 20
FC Tulsa 10 19
Phoenix Risi. 12 16
Sacramento R. 9 13
Oakland Roots 10 13
North Caroli. 10 13
San Antonio 9 13
El Paso 10 13
Detroit City 12 13
Colorado S. 12 13
New Mexico 11 13
Loudoun Utd 10 11
Birmingham L. 9 10
Tampa Bay 12 10
Rhode Island 11 10
Lexington 10 9
Hartford A. 8 8
Orange County 10 8
Indy Eleven 9 8
Miami FC 9 8
Pittsburgh 10 7
Monterey Bay 12 7
Las Vegas L. 9 6

Offence

GP GF
Louisville C. 21 42
Charleston 20 41
FC Tulsa 21 37
Phoenix Risi. 21 35
El Paso 20 33
Indy Eleven 20 32
Loudoun Utd 20 31
North Caroli. 20 31
Hartford A. 20 29
Sacramento R. 20 29
Orange County 19 28
New Mexico 19 26
Colorado S. 20 25
San Antonio 20 25
Birmingham L. 21 24
Detroit City 21 24
Oakland Roots 20 24
Lexington 21 23
Monterey Bay 22 23
Tampa Bay 20 22
Miami FC 21 21
Pittsburgh 21 20
Las Vegas L. 21 17
Rhode Island 21 15

Defence

GP GA
Sacramento R. 20 17
Louisville C. 21 17
Pittsburgh 21 19
Charleston 20 21
Rhode Island 21 23
Hartford A. 20 23
FC Tulsa 21 23
Detroit City 21 24
Orange County 19 25
San Antonio 20 26
North Caroli. 20 27
Lexington 21 27
El Paso 20 27
New Mexico 19 28
Monterey Bay 22 29
Loudoun Utd 20 29
Colorado S. 20 29
Tampa Bay 20 31
Oakland Roots 20 32
Birmingham L. 21 33
Miami FC 21 34
Phoenix Risi. 21 37
Indy Eleven 20 37
Las Vegas L. 21 39






Total Match Goals stats


Total match goals stats

Matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Indy Eleven  20 3.45 100% 75% 65% 60% 25% 10% 70% 20% 10% 20% 10%
Phoenix Rising  21 3.43 100% 86% 62% 48% 29% 10% 76% 10% 14% 10% 14%
Charleston  20 3.10 95% 85% 75% 35% 15% 5% 70% 25% 10% 20% 5%
El Paso  20 3.00 90% 80% 70% 30% 10% 10% 60% 25% 25% 15% 15%
Loudoun Utd  20 3.00 90% 85% 60% 35% 25% 5% 60% 20% 30% 10% 20%
North Carolina  20 2.90 100% 75% 60% 25% 20% 10% 70% 20% 10% 20% 10%
FC Tulsa  21 2.86 100% 71% 43% 29% 24% 10% 67% 29% 5% 29% 5%
New Mexico  19 2.84 95% 68% 63% 26% 16% 11% 47% 37% 21% 32% 16%
Louisville City  21 2.81 90% 86% 48% 24% 24% 10% 67% 33% 10% 24% 0%
Oakland Roots  20 2.80 90% 75% 60% 20% 20% 15% 50% 30% 30% 20% 20%
Orange County  19 2.79 95% 74% 63% 32% 11% 5% 47% 21% 37% 16% 32%
Birmingham L.  21 2.71 95% 67% 43% 38% 19% 10% 62% 10% 33% 5% 29%
Colorado S.  20 2.70 95% 70% 55% 35% 15% 0% 70% 20% 15% 15% 10%
Las Vegas L.  21 2.67 86% 62% 48% 33% 24% 10% 33% 38% 43% 24% 29%
Tampa Bay  20 2.65 100% 80% 65% 20% 0% 0% 70% 5% 25% 5% 25%
Miami FC  21 2.62 95% 81% 52% 19% 10% 5% 62% 14% 29% 10% 24%
Hartford A.  20 2.60 90% 70% 45% 20% 15% 10% 40% 35% 35% 25% 25%
San Antonio  20 2.55 85% 70% 55% 25% 15% 5% 55% 35% 25% 20% 10%
Lexington  21 2.38 86% 76% 43% 19% 10% 5% 57% 33% 24% 19% 10%
Monterey Bay  22 2.36 86% 73% 50% 18% 9% 0% 50% 18% 45% 5% 32%
Sacramento R.  20 2.30 90% 60% 40% 25% 10% 5% 40% 40% 30% 30% 20%
Detroit City  21 2.29 86% 76% 33% 24% 10% 0% 43% 38% 33% 24% 19%
Pittsburgh  21 1.86 90% 67% 24% 5% 0% 0% 43% 38% 29% 29% 19%
Rhode Island  21 1.81 86% 62% 29% 5% 0% 0% 24% 33% 57% 19% 43%
League average 92.2% 73.9% 51.8% 26.9% 14.7% 6.1% 55.5% 26.1% 26.1% 18.4% 18.4%

Total match goals stats (last 8 matches)

Last 8 matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
FC Tulsa  8 4.00 100% 88% 62% 50% 50% 25% 88% 12% 0% 12% 0%
Indy Eleven  8 3.63 100% 75% 75% 62% 38% 12% 62% 25% 12% 25% 12%
Las Vegas L.  8 3.63 100% 88% 62% 50% 25% 25% 50% 12% 38% 12% 38%
Phoenix Rising  8 3.63 100% 88% 62% 50% 50% 12% 75% 0% 25% 0% 25%
New Mexico  8 3.50 88% 75% 75% 50% 25% 25% 62% 12% 38% 0% 25%
North Carolina  8 3.50 100% 88% 75% 38% 38% 12% 88% 0% 12% 0% 12%
Louisville City  8 3.38 88% 75% 62% 50% 50% 12% 75% 25% 12% 12% 0%
Loudoun Utd  8 3.00 75% 75% 62% 50% 38% 0% 50% 25% 50% 0% 25%
Miami FC  8 3.00 88% 88% 50% 38% 25% 12% 62% 12% 38% 0% 25%
El Paso  8 2.88 88% 75% 75% 25% 12% 12% 38% 38% 38% 25% 25%
Birmingham L.  8 2.75 88% 62% 38% 38% 38% 12% 62% 12% 38% 0% 25%
Monterey Bay  8 2.75 88% 75% 75% 25% 12% 0% 62% 12% 38% 0% 25%
Charleston  8 2.63 88% 62% 62% 25% 25% 0% 50% 38% 25% 25% 12%
Oakland Roots  8 2.63 100% 75% 50% 12% 12% 12% 50% 38% 12% 38% 12%
Hartford A.  8 2.50 88% 75% 50% 25% 12% 0% 38% 50% 25% 38% 12%
Tampa Bay  8 2.50 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 0% 62% 12% 25% 12% 25%
Colorado S.  8 2.38 100% 50% 50% 25% 12% 0% 50% 25% 25% 25% 25%
Orange County  8 2.38 88% 62% 50% 25% 12% 0% 38% 50% 25% 38% 12%
Sacramento R.  8 2.38 88% 62% 38% 25% 12% 12% 25% 62% 25% 50% 12%
San Antonio  8 2.13 75% 50% 38% 25% 12% 12% 50% 38% 38% 12% 12%
Lexington  8 2.00 88% 62% 38% 12% 0% 0% 50% 50% 12% 38% 0%
Pittsburgh  8 2.00 88% 75% 25% 12% 0% 0% 62% 38% 12% 25% 0%
Detroit City  8 1.63 88% 62% 12% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 38% 38% 25%
Rhode Island  8 1.38 75% 50% 12% 0% 0% 0% 12% 38% 75% 12% 50%
League average 90.1% 71.4% 52.1% 30.7% 20.8% 8.3% 53.6% 28.1% 28.1% 18.2% 18.2%

Total match goals stats (at home)

Home matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
El Paso  10 3.90 100% 90% 90% 50% 20% 20% 60% 30% 10% 30% 10%
Orange County  9 3.89 100% 100% 100% 56% 22% 11% 67% 11% 22% 11% 22%
Indy Eleven  11 3.64 100% 73% 73% 64% 27% 9% 64% 27% 9% 27% 9%
Phoenix Rising  9 3.56 100% 78% 67% 67% 33% 11% 67% 11% 22% 11% 22%
North Carolina  10 3.40 100% 90% 70% 30% 30% 20% 90% 10% 0% 10% 0%
Charleston  9 3.33 100% 89% 78% 33% 22% 11% 56% 44% 0% 44% 0%
Tampa Bay  8 3.25 100% 100% 88% 38% 0% 0% 88% 0% 12% 0% 12%
Loudoun Utd  10 3.20 90% 90% 50% 40% 40% 10% 60% 30% 20% 20% 10%
FC Tulsa  11 3.00 100% 64% 45% 27% 27% 18% 64% 27% 9% 27% 9%
Monterey Bay  10 3.00 90% 90% 70% 30% 20% 0% 80% 10% 20% 0% 10%
Louisville City  11 2.73 82% 82% 45% 27% 27% 9% 55% 45% 18% 27% 0%
Miami FC  12 2.67 92% 75% 58% 25% 8% 8% 67% 17% 25% 8% 17%
New Mexico  8 2.63 100% 62% 50% 25% 12% 12% 62% 38% 0% 38% 0%
San Antonio  11 2.55 100% 73% 55% 18% 9% 0% 55% 36% 9% 36% 9%
Sacramento R.  11 2.45 82% 64% 45% 27% 18% 9% 45% 45% 27% 27% 9%
Lexington  11 2.18 82% 82% 36% 9% 9% 0% 55% 36% 27% 18% 9%
Pittsburgh  11 2.18 100% 82% 27% 9% 0% 0% 45% 45% 9% 45% 9%
Las Vegas L.  12 2.17 92% 58% 33% 17% 17% 0% 42% 42% 25% 33% 17%
Hartford A.  12 2.08 92% 67% 42% 8% 0% 0% 33% 50% 25% 42% 17%
Birmingham L.  12 2.00 92% 50% 25% 25% 8% 0% 50% 17% 42% 8% 33%
Detroit City  9 2.00 78% 67% 33% 22% 0% 0% 33% 67% 22% 44% 0%
Oakland Roots  10 2.00 80% 70% 50% 0% 0% 0% 30% 40% 50% 20% 30%
Colorado S.  8 1.88 100% 50% 25% 12% 0% 0% 50% 25% 25% 25% 25%
Rhode Island  10 1.20 70% 40% 10% 0% 0% 0% 30% 40% 60% 10% 30%
League average 92.2% 73.9% 51.8% 26.9% 14.7% 6.1% 55.5% 31.4% 20.8% 23.7% 13.1%

Total match goals stats (away)

Away matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Birmingham L.  9 3.67 100% 89% 67% 56% 33% 22% 78% 0% 22% 0% 22%
Oakland Roots  10 3.60 100% 80% 70% 40% 40% 30% 70% 20% 10% 20% 10%
Hartford A.  8 3.38 88% 75% 50% 38% 38% 25% 50% 12% 50% 0% 38%
Las Vegas L.  9 3.33 78% 67% 67% 56% 33% 22% 22% 33% 67% 11% 44%
Phoenix Rising  12 3.33 100% 92% 58% 33% 25% 8% 83% 8% 8% 8% 8%
Colorado S.  12 3.25 92% 83% 75% 50% 25% 0% 83% 17% 8% 8% 0%
Indy Eleven  9 3.22 100% 78% 56% 56% 22% 11% 78% 11% 11% 11% 11%
New Mexico  11 3.00 91% 73% 73% 27% 18% 9% 36% 36% 36% 27% 27%
Charleston  11 2.91 91% 82% 73% 36% 9% 0% 82% 9% 18% 0% 9%
Louisville City  10 2.90 100% 90% 50% 20% 20% 10% 80% 20% 0% 20% 0%
Loudoun Utd  10 2.80 90% 80% 70% 30% 10% 0% 60% 10% 40% 0% 30%
FC Tulsa  10 2.70 100% 80% 40% 30% 20% 0% 70% 30% 0% 30% 0%
Lexington  10 2.60 90% 70% 50% 30% 10% 10% 60% 30% 20% 20% 10%
Miami FC  9 2.56 100% 89% 44% 11% 11% 0% 56% 11% 33% 11% 33%
San Antonio  9 2.56 67% 67% 56% 33% 22% 11% 56% 33% 44% 0% 11%
Detroit City  12 2.50 92% 83% 33% 25% 17% 0% 50% 17% 42% 8% 33%
North Carolina  10 2.40 100% 60% 50% 20% 10% 0% 50% 30% 20% 30% 20%
Rhode Island  11 2.36 100% 82% 45% 9% 0% 0% 18% 27% 55% 27% 55%
Tampa Bay  12 2.25 100% 67% 50% 8% 0% 0% 58% 8% 33% 8% 33%
Sacramento R.  9 2.11 100% 56% 33% 22% 0% 0% 33% 33% 33% 33% 33%
El Paso  10 2.10 80% 70% 50% 10% 0% 0% 60% 20% 40% 0% 20%
Monterey Bay  12 1.83 83% 58% 33% 8% 0% 0% 25% 25% 67% 8% 50%
Orange County  10 1.80 90% 50% 30% 10% 0% 0% 30% 30% 50% 20% 40%
Pittsburgh  10 1.50 80% 50% 20% 0% 0% 0% 40% 30% 50% 10% 30%
League average 92.2% 73.9% 51.8% 26.9% 14.7% 6.1% 55.5% 20.8% 31.4% 13.1% 23.7%




Segments Table

0 pt Segments table progression arrow 48 pts
5th Segment 4th Segment 3rd Segment 2nd Segment 1st Segment
up to 9.2 pts from 9.3 to 18.9 pts from 19.0 to 28.6 pts from 28.7 to 38.3 pts from 38.4 to 48 pts
(20)  18  Tampa Bay (21)  28  Pittsburgh
(21)  28  Detroit City
(21)  28  Phoenix Rising
(21)  28  Lexington
(19)  27  Orange County
(19)  27  New Mexico
(20)  26  Hartford A.
(20)  24  Colorado S.
(22)  24  Monterey Bay
(20)  23  Indy Eleven
(20)  21  Oakland Roots
(21)  21  Rhode Island
(21)  20  Birmingham L.
(21)  20  Miami FC
(21)  20  Las Vegas L.
(20)  33  North Carolina
(20)  31  Sacramento R.
(20)  31  El Paso
(20)  31  Loudoun Utd
(20)  29  San Antonio
(21)  48  Louisville City
(20)  44  Charleston
(21)  42  FC Tulsa

The Segments Table is a visual representation splitting the teams into 5 segments. Each team is assigned to a specific segment, depending on the team's number of points. Each of the 5 segments spans one-fifth (20%) of the total points held by the team ranked 1st in the league. For each team, the number of matches played appears in green between brackets, and the number of points is displayed in black.








Sun 24 Aug
CHA - LOU
Sun 31 Aug
DET - SAN
Sun 31 Aug
IND - LOU
Sun 31 Aug
LOU - MIA
Sun 31 Aug
RHO - CHA
Sun 31 Aug
NCA - HAR
Sun 31 Aug
TPB - PIT
Sun 31 Aug
COL - TUL
Sun 31 Aug
NMX - SAC
Sun 31 Aug
OAK - MON




League statistics

245 matches played / 360
68.1% completed
Home wins:  44%
Over 1.5 goals:  74%
Draws:  26%
Over 2.5 goals:  52%
Away wins:  30%
Over 3.5 goals:  27%
Goals:  657 Home goals per match:  1.51
Goals per match:  2.68 Away goals per match:  1.17
    Both teams scored:  56%

Results

 Latest results
 Matches by date
 Matches by Matchweek
 Results grid
 Results filter
 Outcome Surprise-Levels

Tables

 Home / Away tables
 Wide table
 Tables by Date
 Form tables
 Projected points

Analysis

 Goals statistics
 Points performance
 Over / Under
 Scored / Conceded
 Home advantage
 Relative form
 Run-in analysis

Goal times

 When goals were scored
 1st-half / 2nd-half
 First team to score
 Goal types
 Lead durations
 Points Won/Lost
Home team scored first: 51% No goal scored: 8% Away team scored first: 41%
Average minute when home team scored first: 32 min. Average minute when away team scored first: 31 min.
Home team lead-defending rate: 65% Away team lead-defending rate: 51%
Home team equalizing rate: 49% Away team equalizing rate: 35%
Home team lead duration: 28% Teams level in goals: 50% Away team lead duration: 21%
Home PPG when home team scored first: 2.32 Away PPG when away team scored first: 1.96

More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 245 matches played in the league, a total of 657 goals have been scored (2.68 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including the league results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded.

 

advertisement


 

SoccerSTATS.com - Public edition

SoccerSTATS.com provides football statistics, results and blog articles on national and international soccer competitions worldwide. Football fans can keep a tab on stats related to their favourite team or leagues of interest, and access a wide range of team performance data analytics and league standings, not only on the world's most famous professional leagues, but also on amateur and regional leagues over the world. Example of soccer statistics include league standings, form tables, top goal scorers, scoring stats, statistical previews and goal timing statistics.
Follow us on Twitter
F.A.Q. Contact Privacy Policy Change consent
Terms & conditions of use About us Cookie usage and options
Mobile app

Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. Products, services, promotional offers and other offerings from partners and advertisers are subject to terms and conditions. By using this website you certify that you agree with the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy and that you are over the age of 18 or that you have the permission of a parent or guardian to use this website, after your parent or guardian has carefully reviewed and agreed to the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy. The website's content is provided for informational purposes only is not to be relied upon as a professional opinion whatsover. Nothing on this website should be considered as advice. This website is not associated with nor endorsed by any league or competition (whether professional, collegiate or other types of leagues / competitions), federation, association, club or team. All trademarks, brands, images, logos and names appearing on this website belong to their respective owners.
Useful links (third-party websites):   www.gamcare.org.uk       www.begambleaware.org        gamblingtherapy.org
   
Copyright 1998-2025 SoccerSTATS.com
back to top