SoccerSTATS.com back to top
LEAGUES MATCHES STATS FAV BLOG LOGIN
usa6
USA - NSWL
LATEST MATCHES FORM TABLES HEAD-TO-HEAD GOALS HALF-TIME TIMING FIRST GOAL FAVOURITE STATS
🔍

Bay FC W vs Houston Dash W

advertisement


Visual table

  GP Pts
1  KC Current W 16 40
2  San Diego W. W 16 29
3  Orlando Pride W 16 28
4  Washington S. W 16 28
5  Portland T. W 16 26
6  Seattle Reign W 15 24
7  R. Louisville W 16 22
8  Gotham FC W 16 20
9  N. Carolina W 16 20
10  Houston Dash W 16 18
11  Bay FC W 16 17
12  Angel City W 16 17
13  Chicago RS W 15 8
14  Utah Royals W 16 7

 
Sun 3 Aug 2025
Bay FC W2 2Houston Dash W
Penelope Hocking (16) 1:0
1:1 Kalyssa Van Zanten (72)
Taylor Brooke Huff (74) 2:1
2:2 Sophie Schmidt (88)






Seasonal streaks


2nd consecutive game where Bay FC W scored.
6th consecutive game where Houston Dash W conceded.
3rd consecutive away game where Houston Dash W conceded.
3rd consecutive game where Houston Dash W scored.
2nd consecutive away game where Houston Dash W scored.
3rd consecutive game where Bay FC W conceded.
2nd consecutive home game where Bay FC W conceded.
 

 
Lead durations in 90 minutes of regular time
090
Bay FC W (70)Level (20)Houston Dash W
Lead durations tables
  How are the duration values calculated?

To calculate the above duration values based on a total of 90 minutes, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are considered scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are considered scored on the 90th minute.


Outcome Surprise-Level

Points Per Game (before the match)
Bay FC W
at home
Houston Dash W
away
1.671.20


OutcomeOutcome surprise-level
Draw
14.5%
Scale:
from
0 (less surprising) to 100 (more surprising)

Outcome Surprise-levels

More information on the calculation of the Outcome surprise-level is outlined in the following blog article:
Evaluating surprising results







 






 flag

Bay FC W

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 8 3 2 3  
  Away 8 1 3 4  
  Total 16 4 5 7  
PPG (Home): 1.38
PPG (Away): 0.75
PPG (Total): 1.06

Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game1.06 1.13 +6.6%
AVG Goals For1.13 1.25 +10.6%
AVG Goals Against1.38 1.25 -9.4%



Bay FC W's progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
15 Mar Utah Royals W 1 - 1

1-0   Bianca St Georges (12)

     1-1   Kiki Pickett (44)

Bay FC W - - - 1-1 stats
23 Mar Bay FC W 2 - 0

1-0   Joelle Anderson (12)

2-0   Karlie Lema (45)

R. Louisville W - + - 2-0 stats
29 Mar Washington S. W 2 - 0

1-0   Ashley Hatch (24)

2-0   Ashley Hatch (27)

Bay FC W - - + 2-0 stats
13 Apr Bay FC W 1 - 2

     0-1   Ludmila (5)

     0-2   Ludmila (41)

---------------------------------------
1-2   Caroline Conti (58) pen.
Chicago RS W + - - 0-2 stats
19 Apr N. Carolina W 0 - 1

     0-1   Kiki Pickett (33)

Bay FC W - + - 0-1 stats
27 Apr Bay FC W 1 - 1

1-0   Racheal Kundanaji (32)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Jordyn Huitema (50)
Seattle Reign W - - - 1-0 stats
5 May San Diego W. W 2 - 1

1-0   Kennedy Wesley (6)

     1-1   Karlie Lema (18)

---------------------------------------
2-1   Trinity Armstrong (90)
Bay FC W + - - 1-1 stats
11 May KC Current W 4 - 1

1-0   Bia Zaneratto (3)

2-0   Debinha (33)

3-0   Debinha (38)

---------------------------------------
     3-1   Penelope Hocking (53)

4-1   Temwa Chawinga (62)
Bay FC W + - - 3-0 stats
18 May Bay FC W 2 - 0

1-0   Penelope Hocking (23)

2-0   Caroline Conti (28) pen.

Angel City W - + - 2-0 stats
25 May Houston Dash W 2 - 2

1-0   Avery Patterson (33)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Penelope Hocking (53)

     1-2   Rachel Hill (56)

2-2   Messiah Bright (88)
Bay FC W + - - 1-0 stats
7 Jun Bay FC W 1 - 0

1-0   Alyssa Malonson (39)

Portland T. W - + - 1-0 stats
14 Jun Bay FC W 0 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Barbra Banda (58)
Orlando Pride W - - + 0-0 stats
21 Jun Gotham FC W 2 - 1

     0-1   Penelope Hocking (11)

1-1   Esther González (30)

---------------------------------------
2-1   Geyse da Silva (55)
Bay FC W + - - 1-1 stats
3 Aug Bay FC W 2 - 2

1-0   Penelope Hocking (16)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Kalyssa Van Zanten (72)

2-1   Taylor Brooke Huff (74)

     2-2   Sophie Schmidt (88)
Houston Dash W + - - 1-0 stats
10 Aug Chicago RS W 1 - 1

     0-1   Taylor Brooke Huff (29)

1-1   S. Groom (42)

Bay FC W - - - 1-1 stats
17 Aug Bay FC W 1 - 2

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Kimmi Ascanio (52)

     0-2   Kenza Dali (63)

1-2   Caroline Conti (75) pen.
San Diego W. W + - - 0-0 stats



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
23 Aug Bay FC W h2h Washington S. W 1.38 2.13
2 Sep Angel City W h2h Bay FC W 1.14 0.75
7 Sep Bay FC W h2h KC Current W 1.38 2.33
13 Sep Orlando Pride W h2h Bay FC W 1.75 0.75
22 Sep Bay FC W h2h Gotham FC W 1.38 1.50
28 Sep Bay FC W h2h Utah Royals W 1.38 0.29
5 Oct Portland T. W h2h Bay FC W 2.25 0.75
11 Oct Seattle Reign W h2h Bay FC W 1.43 0.75
18 Oct Bay FC W h2h N. Carolina W 1.38 1.00
1 Nov R. Louisville W h2h Bay FC W 1.25 0.75
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.51

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins ---
Consecutive draws -1-
Consecutive defeats 1-1
No win 355
No draw 1-1
No defeat -1-
1 goal scored or more 264
1 goal conceded or more 355
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded ---
GF+GA over 2.5 2-1
GF+GA under 2.5 -1-
Scored at least twice ---










Comparison with league average


Bay FC W (16 matches) vs league average

(overall)Bay FC W League AVG
Points per game  1.06 1.37
% Wins  25% 37%
% Draws  31% 26%
% Defeats  44% 37%
Goals scored per game  1.13 1.34
Goals conceded per game  1.38 1.34
% Clean sheets  25% 26%
% Failed To Score  12% 26%
% Won To Nil  25% 19%
% Lost To Nil  12% 19%
% Team scored first  50% 46%
% Opponent scored first  50% 46%
Average minute scored first  24 28
Average minute conceded first  24 28
Lead-defending rate  40% 59%
Equalizing rate  30% 41%
% Time leading  28% 26%
% Time level in goals  44% 48%
% Time trailing  28% 26%
PPG when scored first  1.88 2.27
PPG when conceded first  0.25 0.52
Total goals per game  2.50 2.68
% over 1.5 goals  81% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  44% 48%
% over 3.5 goals  19% 28%
% both teams scored  62% 55%

Bay FC W at home (8 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Bay FC W League AVG
Points per game  1.38 1.34
% Wins  38% 36%
% Draws  25% 26%
% Defeats  38% 38%
Goals scored per game  1.25 1.34
Goals conceded per game  1.00 1.33
% Clean sheets  38% 26%
% Failed To Score  12% 26%
% Won To Nil  38% 19%
% Lost To Nil  12% 19%
% Team scored first  62% 41%
% Opponent scored first  38% 51%
Average minute scored first  24 31
Average minute conceded first  38 26
Lead-defending rate  50% 62%
Equalizing rate  0% 45%
% Time leading  39% 23%
% Time level in goals  39% 48%
% Time trailing  22% 29%
PPG when scored first  2.20 2.33
PPG when conceded first  0.00 0.60
Total goals per game  2.25 2.68
% over 1.5 goals  75% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  38% 48%
% over 3.5 goals  12% 28%
% both teams scored  50% 55%

Bay FC W away (8 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Bay FC W League AVG
Points per game  0.75 1.40
% Wins  12% 38%
% Draws  38% 26%
% Defeats  50% 36%
Goals scored per game  1.00 1.33
Goals conceded per game  1.75 1.34
% Clean sheets  12% 26%
% Failed To Score  12% 26%
% Won To Nil  12% 19%
% Lost To Nil  12% 19%
% Team scored first  38% 51%
% Opponent scored first  62% 41%
Average minute scored first  24 26
Average minute conceded first  16 31
Lead-defending rate  25% 55%
Equalizing rate  43% 38%
% Time leading  17% 29%
% Time level in goals  48% 48%
% Time trailing  35% 23%
PPG when scored first  1.33 2.23
PPG when conceded first  0.40 0.43
Total goals per game  2.75 2.68
% over 1.5 goals  88% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  50% 48%
% over 3.5 goals  25% 28%
% both teams scored  75% 55%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Bay FC W
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 8 / 16 50%
  Opponent scored first 8 / 16 50%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 6 / 16 38%
  Opponent was leading at HT 4 / 16 25%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 25.3 min. 28%
  Average minutes level in goals 39.3 min. 44%
  Average minutes trailing 25.4 min. 28%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Bay FC W have been in the lead for an average duration of 25.3 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 25.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Bay FC W
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 16

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 10
  Equalizer goals conceded 6
  Lead defending rate * (1) 40%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 10
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 30%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 5
  Non-crucial goals conceded 6

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Bay FC W have taken the lead 10 times and have conceded an equalizer on 6 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 40% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 60%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 10 times that Bay FC W's opponents have taken the lead, Bay FC W have managed to score an equalizer on 3 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 30%.


 flag Bay FC W
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 5 / 8 62%
  Opponent scored first 3 / 8 38%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 5 / 8 62%
  Opponent was leading at HT 1 / 8 12%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 35.5 min. 39%
  Average minutes level in goals 35.1 min. 39%
  Average minutes trailing 19.4 min. 22%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Bay FC W have been in the lead for an average duration of 35.5 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 19.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Bay FC W
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 8

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 6
  Equalizer goals conceded 3
  Lead defending rate * (1) 50%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 3
  Equalizer goals scored 0
  Equalizing rate * (2) 0%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 4
  Non-crucial goals conceded 2

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Bay FC W have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 3 times that Bay FC W's opponents have taken the lead when Bay FC W were playing at home, Bay FC W have managed to score an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 0%.



 flag Bay FC W
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 3 / 8 38%
  Opponent scored first 5 / 8 62%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 1 / 8 12%
  Opponent was leading at HT 3 / 8 38%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 15.1 min. 17%
  Average minutes level in goals 43.4 min. 48%
  Average minutes trailing 31.5 min. 35%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Bay FC W have been in the lead for an average duration of 15.1 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 31.5 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Bay FC W
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 8

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 4
  Equalizer goals conceded 3
  Lead defending rate * (1) 25%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 7
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 43%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 1
  Non-crucial goals conceded 4

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Bay FC W have taken the lead 4 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 25% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 75%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 7 times that Bay FC W's opponents have taken the lead when Bay FC W were playing away, Bay FC W have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 43%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 KC Current W 16 40 7 Sep 4 - 1 h2h
2 San Diego W. W 16 29 1 - 2 2 - 1 h2h
3 Orlando Pride W 16 28 0 - 1 13 Sep h2h
4 Washington S. W 16 28 23 Aug 2 - 0 h2h
5 Portland T. W 16 26 1 - 0 5 Oct h2h
6 Seattle Reign W 15 24 1 - 1 11 Oct h2h
7 R. Louisville W 16 22 2 - 0 1 Nov h2h
8 Gotham FC W 16 20 22 Sep 2 - 1 h2h
9 N. Carolina W 16 20 18 Oct 0 - 1 h2h
10 Houston Dash W 16 18 2 - 2 2 - 2 h2h
11 Bay FC W 16 17
12 Angel City W 16 17 2 - 0 2 Sep h2h
13 Chicago RS W 15 8 1 - 2 1 - 1 h2h
14 Utah Royals W 16 7 28 Sep 1 - 1 h2h








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 10 818
GF per match 1.251.00 1.13
Goals conceded (GA) 81422
GA per match 1.001.75 1.38
GF + GA per match 2.252.752.50
GF+GA over 0.5 100%100%100%
GF+GA over 1.5 75%88%81%
GF+GA over 2.5 38%50%44%
GF+GA over 3.5 12%25%19%
GF+GA over 4.5 0%12%6%
GF+GA over 5.5 0%0%0%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 75%100%88%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 38%75%56%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 0%12%6%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 38%12%25%
Won-to-nil 38%12%25%
Failed to score 12%12%12%
Lost-to-nil 12%12%12%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 88%88%88%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 62%62%62%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 38%25%31%
Scored in both halves 12%0%6%
Both teams scored 50%75%62%
Conceding Rate 62%88%75%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 12%88%50%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 50%50%50%
Conceded in both halves 0%50%25%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 88%88%88%
GF over 1.5 38%12%25%
GF over 2.5 0%0%0%
GF over 3.5 0%0%0%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 62%88%75%
GA over 1.5 38%62%50%
GA over 2.5 0%12%6%
GA over 3.5 0%12%6%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Bay FC W matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 0%0%0%
Match total goals = 1 25%12%19%
Match total goals = 2 38%38%38%
Match total goals = 3 25%25%25%
Match total goals = 4 12%12%12%
Match total goals = 5+ 0%12%6%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 25%12%19%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 62%62%62%
Match total goals = 4+ 12%25%19%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  12 00
Away wins  10 00
Home & Away wins  22 00
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  30 00
Away defeats  21 10
Home & Away defeats  51 10
Bay FC W have obtained as many one-goal margin wins as wins with a margin of 2 goals or more (2 wins for each).

A majority of Bay FC W's defeats had a one-goal margin (5 defeats), while 2 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 65%
35%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.38
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)0.75
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 56%
44%
  % Goals conceded 36%
64%
  League average 50%
50%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 51 6  38%
Drawing at HT 24 6  38%
Losing at HT 13 4  25%
  Total 8816







Goal times


 flag Bay FC W
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 2
GA 4
16-30 GF 5
GA 3
31-45 GF 5
GA 5
46-60 GF 4
GA 4
61-75 GF 2
GA 3
76-90 GF 0
GA 3
1st Half GF 12
67%
GA 12
55%
2nd Half GF 6
33%
GA 10
45%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 39
 Avg. minute goals conceded 44


  Bay FC W
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 1
GA 1
16-30 GF 3
GA 0
31-45 GF 3
GA 1
46-60 GF 1
GA 3
61-75 GF 2
GA 2
76-90 GF 0
GA 1
1st Half GF 7
70%
GA 2
25%
2nd Half GF 3
30%
GA 6
75%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 40
  Avg. minute goals conceded 54


  Bay FC W
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 1
GA 3
16-30 GF 2
GA 3
31-45 GF 2
GA 4
46-60 GF 3
GA 1
61-75 GF 0
GA 1
76-90 GF 0
GA 2
1st Half GF 5
62%
GA 10
71%
2nd Half GF 3
38%
GA 4
29%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 37
  Avg. minute goals conceded 39








Bay FC W scores

FT at home
1-2 2 25%
2-0 2 25%
2-2 1 12%
1-1 1 12%
0-1 1 12%
1-0 1 12%
FT away
2-1 2 25%
1-1 2 25%
2-2 1 12%
4-1 1 12%
0-1 1 12%
2-0 1 12%

Half-time at home
1-0 3 38%
2-0 2 25%
0-0 2 25%
0-2 1 12%
Half-time away
1-1 4 50%
0-1 1 12%
3-0 1 12%
2-0 1 12%
1-0 1 12%





This season in the league
Bay FC W have scored in 7 of their 8 away matches. Bay FC W have scored 67% of their goals in the first half.


 flag

Houston Dash W

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 9 2 2 5  
  Away 7 3 1 3  
  Total 16 5 3 8  
PPG (Home): 0.89
PPG (Away): 1.43
PPG (Total): 1.13

Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game1.13 1.00 -11.5%
AVG Goals For1.19 1.50 +26.1%
AVG Goals Against1.63 2.00 +22.7%



Houston Dash W's progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
15 Mar Houston Dash W 1 - 2

     0-1   Makenna Morris (16)

     0-2   Ashley Hatch (33)

---------------------------------------
1-2   Maggie Graham (75)
Washington S. W + - - 0-2 stats
23 Mar Chicago RS W 1 - 2

1-0   J. Joseph (17)

     1-1   Paige Nielsen (20)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   Maggie Graham (64)
Houston Dash W + - - 1-1 stats
29 Mar Houston Dash W 0 - 0

Gotham FC W - + + 0-0 stats
12 Apr Houston Dash W 1 - 3

     0-1   Macey Kamryn Hodge (13)

     0-2   Riley Tiernan (29)

---------------------------------------
1-2   Bárbara Olivieri (61)

     1-3   A. Thompson (86)
Angel City W + - - 0-2 stats
19 Apr KC Current W 2 - 0

1-0   Lo’eau LaBonta (21) pen.

---------------------------------------
2-0   Kayla Sharples (62)
Houston Dash W - - + 1-0 stats
26 Apr Houston Dash W 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Delanie Sheehan (80)
Utah Royals W - + - 0-0 stats
3 May Houston Dash W 1 - 2

1-0   Avery Patterson (8)

     1-1   Kayla Fischer (20)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   E. Sears (70)
R. Louisville W + - - 1-1 stats
12 May Seattle Reign W 0 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Maggie Graham (57)
Houston Dash W - + - 0-0 stats
17 May Houston Dash W 1 - 4

     0-1   Pietra Tordin (26)

     0-2   Payton Linnehan (30)

     0-3   Samantha Coffey (45) pen.

---------------------------------------
     0-4   Caiya Hanks (54)

1-4   Sam Hiatt (o.g.) (75)
Portland T. W + - - 0-3 stats
25 May Houston Dash W 2 - 2

1-0   Avery Patterson (33)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Penelope Hocking (53)

     1-2   Rachel Hill (56)

2-2   Messiah Bright (88)
Bay FC W + - - 1-0 stats
7 Jun Orlando Pride W 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Coriana Dyke (90)
Houston Dash W - - + 0-0 stats
14 Jun Houston Dash W 2 - 3

     0-1   Kenza Dali (17)

     0-2   Adriana Leon (36)

---------------------------------------
     0-3   María Sánchez (51)

1-3   Bárbara Olivieri (61)

2-3   Yazmeen Ryan (68)
San Diego W. W + - - 0-2 stats
21 Jun N. Carolina W 2 - 1

     0-1   Avery Patterson (1)

---------------------------------------
1-1   Jaedyn Shaw (71)

2-1   Hannah Betfort (81)
Houston Dash W + - - 0-1 stats
3 Aug Bay FC W 2 - 2

1-0   Penelope Hocking (16)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Kalyssa Van Zanten (72)

2-1   Taylor Brooke Huff (74)

     2-2   Sophie Schmidt (88)
Houston Dash W + - - 1-0 stats
9 Aug Houston Dash W 2 - 1

     0-1   Riley Jackson (32) pen.

1-1   Kalyssa Van Zanten (39)

---------------------------------------
2-1   Sophie Schmidt (90)
N. Carolina W + - - 1-1 stats
17 Aug Gotham FC W 1 - 2

1-0   Esther González (8)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   E. Sonnett (o.g.) (51)

     1-2   Michelle Alozie (90)
Houston Dash W + - - 1-0 stats



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
24 Aug Houston Dash W h2h Seattle Reign W 0.89 1.75
29 Aug R. Louisville W h2h Houston Dash W 1.25 1.43
8 Sep San Diego W. W h2h Houston Dash W 1.50 1.43
14 Sep Utah Royals W h2h Houston Dash W 0.56 1.43
20 Sep Houston Dash W h2h Chicago RS W 0.89 0.71
28 Sep Washington S. W h2h Houston Dash W 1.38 1.43
4 Oct Houston Dash W h2h Orlando Pride W 0.89 1.75
12 Oct Angel City W h2h Houston Dash W 1.14 1.43
18 Oct Houston Dash W h2h KC Current W 0.89 2.33
1 Nov Portland T. W h2h Houston Dash W 2.25 1.43
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.46

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins 112
Consecutive draws ---
Consecutive defeats ---
No win ---
No draw 212
No defeat 123
1 goal scored or more 735
1 goal conceded or more 548
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded ---
GF+GA over 2.5 535
GF+GA under 2.5 ---
Scored at least twice 323










Comparison with league average


Houston Dash W (16 matches) vs league average

(overall)Houston Dash W League AVG
Points per game  1.13 1.37
% Wins  31% 37%
% Draws  19% 26%
% Defeats  50% 37%
Goals scored per game  1.19 1.34
Goals conceded per game  1.63 1.34
% Clean sheets  19% 26%
% Failed To Score  19% 26%
% Won To Nil  12% 19%
% Lost To Nil  12% 19%
% Team scored first  31% 46%
% Opponent scored first  62% 46%
Average minute scored first  36 28
Average minute conceded first  26 28
Lead-defending rate  62% 59%
Equalizing rate  43% 41%
% Time leading  12% 26%
% Time level in goals  51% 48%
% Time trailing  38% 26%
PPG when scored first  1.40 2.27
PPG when conceded first  1.00 0.52
Total goals per game  2.81 2.68
% over 1.5 goals  75% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  69% 48%
% over 3.5 goals  31% 28%
% both teams scored  69% 55%

Houston Dash W at home (9 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Houston Dash W League AVG
Points per game  0.89 1.34
% Wins  22% 36%
% Draws  22% 26%
% Defeats  56% 38%
Goals scored per game  1.22 1.34
Goals conceded per game  1.89 1.33
% Clean sheets  22% 26%
% Failed To Score  11% 26%
% Won To Nil  11% 19%
% Lost To Nil  0% 19%
% Team scored first  33% 41%
% Opponent scored first  56% 51%
Average minute scored first  40 31
Average minute conceded first  21 26
Lead-defending rate  50% 62%
Equalizing rate  29% 45%
% Time leading  5% 23%
% Time level in goals  52% 48%
% Time trailing  43% 29%
PPG when scored first  1.33 2.33
PPG when conceded first  0.60 0.60
Total goals per game  3.11 2.68
% over 1.5 goals  78% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  78% 48%
% over 3.5 goals  44% 28%
% both teams scored  78% 55%

Houston Dash W away (7 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Houston Dash W League AVG
Points per game  1.43 1.40
% Wins  43% 38%
% Draws  14% 26%
% Defeats  43% 36%
Goals scored per game  1.14 1.33
Goals conceded per game  1.29 1.34
% Clean sheets  14% 26%
% Failed To Score  29% 26%
% Won To Nil  14% 19%
% Lost To Nil  29% 19%
% Team scored first  29% 51%
% Opponent scored first  71% 41%
Average minute scored first  29 26
Average minute conceded first  30 31
Lead-defending rate  75% 55%
Equalizing rate  57% 38%
% Time leading  20% 29%
% Time level in goals  49% 48%
% Time trailing  31% 23%
PPG when scored first  1.50 2.23
PPG when conceded first  1.40 0.43
Total goals per game  2.43 2.68
% over 1.5 goals  71% 74%
% over 2.5 goals  57% 48%
% over 3.5 goals  14% 28%
% both teams scored  57% 55%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Houston Dash W
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 5 / 16 31%
  Opponent scored first 10 / 16 62%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 2 / 16 12%
  Opponent was leading at HT 7 / 16 44%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 10.7 min. 12%
  Average minutes level in goals 45.5 min. 51%
  Average minutes trailing 33.8 min. 38%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Houston Dash W have been in the lead for an average duration of 10.7 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 33.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Houston Dash W
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 16

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 8
  Equalizer goals conceded 3
  Lead defending rate * (1) 62%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 14
  Equalizer goals scored 6
  Equalizing rate * (2) 43%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 5
  Non-crucial goals conceded 9

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Houston Dash W have taken the lead 8 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 62% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 38%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 14 times that Houston Dash W's opponents have taken the lead, Houston Dash W have managed to score an equalizer on 6 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 43%.


 flag Houston Dash W
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 3 / 9 33%
  Opponent scored first 5 / 9 56%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 1 / 9 11%
  Opponent was leading at HT 4 / 9 44%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 4.7 min. 5%
  Average minutes level in goals 46.8 min. 52%
  Average minutes trailing 38.6 min. 43%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Houston Dash W have been in the lead for an average duration of 4.7 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 38.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Houston Dash W
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 9

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 4
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 50%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 7
  Equalizer goals scored 2
  Equalizing rate * (2) 29%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 5
  Non-crucial goals conceded 8

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Houston Dash W have taken the lead 4 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 7 times that Houston Dash W's opponents have taken the lead when Houston Dash W were playing at home, Houston Dash W have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 29%.



 flag Houston Dash W
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 2 / 7 29%
  Opponent scored first 5 / 7 71%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 1 / 7 14%
  Opponent was leading at HT 3 / 7 43%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 18.4 min. 20%
  Average minutes level in goals 43.9 min. 49%
  Average minutes trailing 27.7 min. 31%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Houston Dash W have been in the lead for an average duration of 18.4 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 27.7 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Houston Dash W
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 7

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 4
  Equalizer goals conceded 1
  Lead defending rate * (1) 75%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 7
  Equalizer goals scored 4
  Equalizing rate * (2) 57%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 0
  Non-crucial goals conceded 1

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Houston Dash W have taken the lead 4 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 75% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 25%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 7 times that Houston Dash W's opponents have taken the lead when Houston Dash W were playing away, Houston Dash W have managed to score an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 57%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 KC Current W 16 40 18 Oct 2 - 0 h2h
2 San Diego W. W 16 29 2 - 3 8 Sep h2h
3 Orlando Pride W 16 28 4 Oct 1 - 0 h2h
4 Washington S. W 16 28 1 - 2 28 Sep h2h
5 Portland T. W 16 26 1 - 4 1 Nov h2h
6 Seattle Reign W 15 24 24 Aug 0 - 1 h2h
7 R. Louisville W 16 22 1 - 2 29 Aug h2h
8 Gotham FC W 16 20 0 - 0 1 - 2 h2h
9 N. Carolina W 16 20 2 - 1 2 - 1 h2h
10 Houston Dash W 16 18
11 Bay FC W 16 17 2 - 2 2 - 2 h2h
12 Angel City W 16 17 1 - 3 12 Oct h2h
13 Chicago RS W 15 8 20 Sep 1 - 2 h2h
14 Utah Royals W 16 7 1 - 0 14 Sep h2h








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 11 819
GF per match 1.221.14 1.19
Goals conceded (GA) 17926
GA per match 1.891.29 1.63
GF + GA per match 3.112.432.81
GF+GA over 0.5 89%100%94%
GF+GA over 1.5 78%71%75%
GF+GA over 2.5 78%57%69%
GF+GA over 3.5 44%14%31%
GF+GA over 4.5 22%0%12%
GF+GA over 5.5 0%0%0%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 78%71%75%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 67%14%44%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 11%0%6%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 22%14%19%
Won-to-nil 11%14%12%
Failed to score 11%29%19%
Lost-to-nil 0%29%12%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 89%71%81%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 33%29%31%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 78%57%69%
Scored in both halves 22%14%19%
Both teams scored 78%57%69%
Conceding Rate 78%86%81%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 67%57%62%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 56%57%56%
Conceded in both halves 44%29%38%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 89%71%81%
GF over 1.5 33%43%38%
GF over 2.5 0%0%0%
GF over 3.5 0%0%0%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 78%86%81%
GA over 1.5 67%43%56%
GA over 2.5 33%0%19%
GA over 3.5 11%0%6%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Houston Dash W matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 11%0%6%
Match total goals = 1 11%29%19%
Match total goals = 2 0%14%6%
Match total goals = 3 33%43%38%
Match total goals = 4 22%14%19%
Match total goals = 5+ 22%0%12%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 22%29%25%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 33%57%44%
Match total goals = 4+ 44%14%31%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  20 00
Away wins  30 00
Home & Away wins  50 00
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  31 10
Away defeats  21 00
Home & Away defeats  52 10

A majority of Houston Dash W's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (5 wins), while 0 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more.

A majority of Houston Dash W's defeats had a one-goal margin (5 defeats), while 3 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 44%
56%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)0.89
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)1.43
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 58%
42%
  % Goals conceded 65%
35%
  League average 50%
50%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 11 2  12%
Drawing at HT 43 7  44%
Losing at HT 43 7  44%
  Total 9716







Goal times


 flag Houston Dash W
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 2
GA 2
16-30 GF 1
GA 9
31-45 GF 2
GA 4
46-60 GF 2
GA 4
61-75 GF 7
GA 4
76-90 GF 5
GA 3
1st Half GF 5
26%
GA 15
58%
2nd Half GF 14
74%
GA 11
42%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 59
 Avg. minute goals conceded 43


  Houston Dash W
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 1
GA 1
16-30 GF 0
GA 6
31-45 GF 2
GA 4
46-60 GF 0
GA 4
61-75 GF 5
GA 1
76-90 GF 3
GA 1
1st Half GF 3
27%
GA 11
65%
2nd Half GF 8
73%
GA 6
35%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 62
  Avg. minute goals conceded 39


  Houston Dash W
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 1
GA 1
16-30 GF 1
GA 3
31-45 GF 0
GA 0
46-60 GF 2
GA 0
61-75 GF 2
GA 3
76-90 GF 2
GA 2
1st Half GF 2
25%
GA 4
44%
2nd Half GF 6
75%
GA 5
56%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 55
  Avg. minute goals conceded 49








Houston Dash W scores

FT at home
1-2 2 22%
1-4 1 11%
2-3 1 11%
1-3 1 11%
2-2 1 11%
2-1 1 11%
1-0 1 11%
0-0 1 11%
FT away
1-2 2 29%
2-2 1 14%
2-1 1 14%
0-1 1 14%
2-0 1 14%
1-0 1 14%
The Houston Dash W score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 1-2 so far (2 times). The Houston Dash W score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-2 so far (2 times).
Half-time at home
0-2 3 33%
1-1 2 22%
0-0 2 22%
0-3 1 11%
1-0 1 11%
Half-time away
1-0 3 43%
0-0 2 29%
1-1 1 14%
0-1 1 14%





This season in the league
Houston Dash W failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 8 matches. Houston Dash W conceded at least one goal in 7 of their 9 home matches. 74% of Houston Dash W's goals have been scored in the second half. Houston Dash W have lost 5 of their 9 home matches. Houston Dash W failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 5 home matches. Houston Dash W have scored 2 goals or more in each of their last 3 matches.








Tables overview

Points

GP pts
KC Current W 16 40
San Diego W.. 16 29
Orlando Prid. 16 28
Washington S. 16 28
Portland T. W 16 26
Seattle Reig. 15 24
R. Louisvill. 16 22
Gotham FC W 16 20
N. Carolina W 16 20
Houston Dash. 16 18
Bay FC W 16 17
Angel City W 16 17
Chicago RS W 15 8
Utah Royals W 16 7

Form (last 8)

GP pts
KC Current W 8 22
San Diego W.. 8 15
Portland T. W 8 14
Seattle Reig. 8 13
Washington S. 8 13
Orlando Prid. 8 12
R. Louisvill. 8 11
N. Carolina W 8 11
Bay FC W 8 9
Gotham FC W 8 8
Houston Dash. 8 8
Chicago RS W 8 4
Angel City W 8 3
Utah Royals W 8 3

Home

GP pts
KC Current W 7 19
Portland T. W 8 18
Orlando Prid. 8 14
San Diego W.. 8 12
N. Carolina W 8 12
Bay FC W 8 11
Washington S. 8 11
Seattle Reig. 7 10
R. Louisvill. 8 10
Gotham FC W 8 8
Angel City W 7 8
Houston Dash. 9 8
Utah Royals W 9 5
Chicago RS W 8 3

Away

GP pts
KC Current W 9 21
San Diego W.. 8 17
Washington S. 8 17
Seattle Reig. 8 14
Orlando Prid. 8 14
Gotham FC W 8 12
R. Louisvill. 8 12
Houston Dash. 7 10
Angel City W 9 9
Portland T. W 8 8
N. Carolina W 8 8
Bay FC W 8 6
Chicago RS W 7 5
Utah Royals W 7 2

Offence

GP GF
KC Current W 16 32
San Diego W.. 16 28
Portland T. W 16 25
Washington S. 16 25
Orlando Prid. 16 22
R. Louisvill. 16 22
Angel City W 16 21
Seattle Reig. 15 21
Gotham FC W 16 20
N. Carolina W 16 20
Houston Dash. 16 19
Bay FC W 16 18
Chicago RS W 15 12
Utah Royals W 16 12

Defence

GP GA
KC Current W 16 10
Orlando Prid. 16 12
Gotham FC W 16 16
Seattle Reig. 15 17
Portland T. W 16 17
San Diego W.. 16 18
Washington S. 16 22
Bay FC W 16 22
N. Carolina W 16 23
Houston Dash. 16 26
R. Louisvill. 16 27
Angel City W 16 27
Chicago RS W 15 29
Utah Royals W 16 31






Total Match Goals stats


Total match goals stats

Matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
R. Louisville W  16 3.06 100% 81% 44% 38% 31% 12% 56% 19% 25% 19% 25%
Angel City W  16 3.00 94% 88% 50% 38% 19% 6% 62% 12% 31% 6% 25%
Washington S. W  16 2.94 88% 81% 56% 31% 19% 12% 50% 31% 31% 19% 19%
San Diego W. W  16 2.88 88% 81% 56% 25% 25% 6% 69% 25% 19% 12% 6%
Houston Dash W  16 2.81 94% 75% 69% 31% 12% 0% 69% 19% 19% 12% 12%
Chicago RS W  15 2.73 93% 73% 53% 33% 13% 7% 53% 7% 47% 0% 40%
N. Carolina W  16 2.69 88% 81% 50% 25% 12% 6% 69% 25% 19% 12% 6%
Utah Royals W  16 2.69 94% 69% 44% 31% 25% 6% 44% 12% 50% 6% 44%
KC Current W  16 2.63 94% 69% 44% 31% 19% 6% 38% 56% 12% 50% 6%
Portland T. W  16 2.63 94% 62% 38% 31% 25% 12% 56% 31% 19% 25% 12%
Seattle Reign W  15 2.53 100% 67% 47% 20% 13% 7% 60% 27% 13% 27% 13%
Bay FC W  16 2.50 100% 81% 44% 19% 6% 0% 62% 25% 12% 25% 12%
Gotham FC W  16 2.25 81% 69% 50% 19% 6% 0% 44% 38% 38% 19% 19%
Orlando Pride W  16 2.13 94% 56% 25% 19% 12% 6% 38% 38% 31% 31% 25%
League average 92.8% 73.9% 47.7% 27.9% 17.1% 6.3% 55.0% 26.1% 26.1% 18.9% 18.9%

Total match goals stats (last 8 matches)

Last 8 matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Houston Dash W  8 3.50 100% 88% 88% 50% 25% 0% 88% 0% 12% 0% 12%
R. Louisville W  8 3.38 100% 88% 50% 50% 38% 12% 62% 12% 25% 12% 25%
Utah Royals W  8 3.25 88% 75% 62% 50% 38% 12% 62% 12% 38% 0% 25%
Seattle Reign W  8 3.13 100% 75% 62% 38% 25% 12% 62% 25% 12% 25% 12%
Chicago RS W  8 3.00 100% 88% 50% 50% 12% 0% 75% 0% 25% 0% 25%
N. Carolina W  8 3.00 88% 88% 62% 25% 12% 12% 75% 25% 12% 12% 0%
Portland T. W  8 2.75 100% 75% 38% 25% 25% 12% 62% 25% 12% 25% 12%
Washington S. W  8 2.75 75% 75% 62% 38% 12% 12% 62% 25% 38% 0% 12%
San Diego W. W  8 2.63 75% 62% 50% 25% 25% 12% 62% 38% 25% 12% 0%
Bay FC W  8 2.50 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 0% 62% 25% 12% 25% 12%
Angel City W  8 2.38 88% 75% 38% 25% 12% 0% 50% 12% 50% 0% 38%
KC Current W  8 2.25 88% 50% 38% 25% 12% 12% 38% 62% 12% 50% 0%
Gotham FC W  8 2.00 88% 62% 50% 0% 0% 0% 50% 25% 38% 12% 25%
Orlando Pride W  8 1.63 88% 50% 12% 12% 0% 0% 38% 38% 38% 25% 25%
League average 91.1% 73.2% 50.9% 31.3% 17.0% 7.1% 60.7% 23.2% 25.0% 14.3% 16.1%

Total match goals stats (at home)

Home matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Washington S. W  8 3.88 100% 100% 75% 50% 25% 25% 62% 12% 25% 12% 25%
Angel City W  7 3.29 100% 100% 71% 43% 14% 0% 71% 14% 14% 14% 14%
Houston Dash W  9 3.11 89% 78% 78% 44% 22% 0% 78% 22% 11% 11% 0%
Chicago RS W  8 3.00 100% 88% 62% 38% 12% 0% 75% 0% 25% 0% 25%
KC Current W  7 3.00 86% 71% 57% 43% 29% 14% 43% 57% 14% 43% 0%
San Diego W. W  8 3.00 88% 88% 50% 25% 25% 12% 75% 12% 25% 0% 12%
Portland T. W  8 2.88 88% 62% 38% 38% 38% 25% 50% 50% 12% 38% 0%
Orlando Pride W  8 2.63 100% 62% 38% 25% 25% 12% 50% 25% 25% 25% 25%
R. Louisville W  8 2.50 100% 75% 25% 25% 25% 0% 38% 25% 38% 25% 38%
Bay FC W  8 2.25 100% 75% 38% 12% 0% 0% 50% 38% 12% 38% 12%
N. Carolina W  8 2.25 88% 75% 38% 12% 12% 0% 62% 25% 25% 12% 12%
Utah Royals W  9 2.11 89% 56% 33% 22% 11% 0% 33% 22% 56% 11% 44%
Gotham FC W  8 2.00 75% 62% 50% 12% 0% 0% 50% 25% 50% 0% 25%
Seattle Reign W  7 1.57 100% 43% 14% 0% 0% 0% 29% 43% 29% 43% 29%
League average 92.8% 73.9% 47.7% 27.9% 17.1% 6.3% 55.0% 26.1% 26.1% 18.9% 18.9%

Total match goals stats (away)

Away matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
R. Louisville W  8 3.63 100% 88% 62% 50% 38% 25% 75% 12% 12% 12% 12%
Utah Royals W  7 3.43 100% 86% 57% 43% 43% 14% 57% 0% 43% 0% 43%
Seattle Reign W  8 3.38 100% 88% 75% 38% 25% 12% 88% 12% 0% 12% 0%
N. Carolina W  8 3.13 88% 88% 62% 38% 12% 12% 75% 25% 12% 12% 0%
Angel City W  9 2.78 89% 78% 33% 33% 22% 11% 56% 11% 44% 0% 33%
Bay FC W  8 2.75 100% 88% 50% 25% 12% 0% 75% 12% 12% 12% 12%
San Diego W. W  8 2.75 88% 75% 62% 25% 25% 0% 62% 38% 12% 25% 0%
Gotham FC W  8 2.50 88% 75% 50% 25% 12% 0% 38% 50% 25% 38% 12%
Chicago RS W  7 2.43 86% 57% 43% 29% 14% 14% 29% 14% 71% 0% 57%
Houston Dash W  7 2.43 100% 71% 57% 14% 0% 0% 57% 14% 29% 14% 29%
Portland T. W  8 2.38 100% 62% 38% 25% 12% 0% 62% 12% 25% 12% 25%
KC Current W  9 2.33 100% 67% 33% 22% 11% 0% 33% 56% 11% 56% 11%
Washington S. W  8 2.00 75% 62% 38% 12% 12% 0% 38% 50% 38% 25% 12%
Orlando Pride W  8 1.63 88% 50% 12% 12% 0% 0% 25% 50% 38% 38% 25%
League average 92.8% 73.9% 47.7% 27.9% 17.1% 6.3% 55.0% 26.1% 26.1% 18.9% 18.9%




Segments Table

0 pt Segments table progression arrow 40 pts
5th Segment 4th Segment 3rd Segment 2nd Segment 1st Segment
up to 7.6 pts from 7.7 to 15.7 pts from 15.8 to 23.8 pts from 23.9 to 31.9 pts from 32.0 to 40 pts
(16)  7  Utah Royals W (15)  8  Chicago RS W (16)  22  R. Louisville W
(16)  20  Gotham FC W
(16)  20  N. Carolina W
(16)  18  Houston Dash W
(16)  17  Bay FC W
(16)  17  Angel City W
(16)  29  San Diego W. W
(16)  28  Orlando Pride W
(16)  28  Washington S. W
(16)  26  Portland T. W
(15)  24  Seattle Reign W
(16)  40  KC Current W

The Segments Table is a visual representation splitting the teams into 5 segments. Each team is assigned to a specific segment, depending on the team's number of points. Each of the 5 segments spans one-fifth (20%) of the total points held by the team ranked 1st in the league. For each team, the number of matches played appears in green between brackets, and the number of points is displayed in black.








Tue 19 Aug
RGN - CHI
Fri 22 Aug
LA - ORL
Sat 23 Aug
CHI - NCC
Sat 23 Aug
BAY - WAS
Sun 24 Aug
NJY - UTA
Sun 24 Aug
POR - KCC
Mon 25 Aug
HOU - RGN




League statistics

111 matches played / 182
61.0% completed
Home wins:  36%
Over 1.5 goals:  74%
Draws:  26%
Over 2.5 goals:  48%
Away wins:  38%
Over 3.5 goals:  28%
Goals:  297 Home goals per match:  1.34
Goals per match:  2.68 Away goals per match:  1.33
    Both teams scored:  55%

Results

 Latest results
 Matches by date
 Matches by Matchweek
 Results grid
 Results filter
 Outcome Surprise-Levels

Tables

 Home / Away tables
 Wide table
 Tables by Date
 Form tables
 Projected points

Analysis

 Goals statistics
 Points performance
 Over / Under
 Scored / Conceded
 Home advantage
 Relative form
 Run-in analysis

Goal times

 When goals were scored
 1st-half / 2nd-half
 First team to score
 Goal types
 Lead durations
 Points Won/Lost
Home team scored first: 41% No goal scored: 7% Away team scored first: 51%
Average minute when home team scored first: 31 min. Average minute when away team scored first: 26 min.
Home team lead-defending rate: 62% Away team lead-defending rate: 55%
Home team equalizing rate: 45% Away team equalizing rate: 38%
Home team lead duration: 23% Teams level in goals: 48% Away team lead duration: 29%
Home PPG when home team scored first: 2.33 Away PPG when away team scored first: 2.23

More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 111 matches played in the league, a total of 297 goals have been scored (2.68 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including the league results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded.

 

SoccerSTATS.com - Public edition

SoccerSTATS.com provides football statistics, results and blog articles on national and international soccer competitions worldwide. Football fans can keep a tab on stats related to their favourite team or leagues of interest, and access a wide range of team performance data analytics and league standings, not only on the world's most famous professional leagues, but also on amateur and regional leagues over the world. Example of soccer statistics include league standings, form tables, top goal scorers, scoring stats, statistical previews and goal timing statistics.
Follow us on Twitter
F.A.Q. Contact Privacy Policy Change consent
Terms & conditions of use About us Cookie usage and options
Mobile app

Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. Products, services, promotional offers and other offerings from partners and advertisers are subject to terms and conditions. By using this website you certify that you agree with the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy and that you are over the age of 18 or that you have the permission of a parent or guardian to use this website, after your parent or guardian has carefully reviewed and agreed to the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy. The website's content is provided for informational purposes only is not to be relied upon as a professional opinion whatsover. Nothing on this website should be considered as advice. This website is not associated with nor endorsed by any league or competition (whether professional, collegiate or other types of leagues / competitions), federation, association, club or team. All trademarks, brands, images, logos and names appearing on this website belong to their respective owners.
Useful links (third-party websites):   www.gamcare.org.uk       www.begambleaware.org        gamblingtherapy.org
   
Copyright 1998-2025 SoccerSTATS.com
back to top