League One
▲ Up trends
▼ Down trends
|
| Home | Away | Total | |
| Played | 21 | 21 | 42 |
| Points Per Game | 1.76 | 1.19 | 1.48 |
| Select Favourite Stats | |||
| View Favourite Stats for all teams | |||
 |
Reading |
(this season in the league) |
Reading's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 2 Aug | Lincoln City |
2:0
1-0 Finley Burns (o.g.) (20) --------------------------------------- 2-0 R. Hackett-Fairchild (67) |
Reading | - | - | + | 1-0 |
|
| 9 Aug | Reading |
0:2
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Jack Whatmough (74) 0-2 Cameron Ashia (90) |
Huddersfield | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 16 Aug | Reading |
1:2
0-1 Mathew Stevens (32) --------------------------------------- 0-2 Marcus Browne (70) 1-2 Lewis Wing (86) |
AFC Wimbledon | + | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| 20 Aug | Bolton |
1:1
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Mason Burstow (52) 1-1 Andre Garcia (84) |
Reading | - | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 23 Aug | Wycombe |
2:2
1-0 Fred Onyedinma (10) 1-1 Mamadi Camar (42) 1-2 Lewis Wing (44) --------------------------------------- 2-2 James Tilley (89) |
Reading | + | - | - | 1-2 |
|
| 30 Aug | Reading |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Paddy Lane (66) |
Port Vale | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| 13 Sep | Barnsley |
3:2
1-0 J. Earl (9) 1-1 Jack Marriott (35) --------------------------------------- 2-1 D. Keillor-Dunn (55) 3-1 A. Phillips (59) pen. 3-2 Daniel Kyerewaa (66) |
Reading | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 20 Sep | Reading |
2:1
1-0 Jack Marriott (21) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Idris El Mizouni (48) 2-1 Liam Fraser (79) |
Leyton Orient | + | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 27 Sep | Stockport |
1:1
1-0 Kyle Wootton (22) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Jack Marriott (72) |
Reading | - | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 4 Oct | Reading |
1:1
0-1 Tyler Roberts (7) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Jack Marriott (71) |
Mansfield | - | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| 11 Oct | Exeter City |
1:1
0-1 Jack Marriott (6) 1-1 Jayden Wareham (11) |
Reading | - | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 18 Oct | Cardiff City |
2:1
0-1 Lewis Wing (38) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Omari Kellyman (49) 2-1 Yousef Salech (65) |
Reading | + | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| 21 Oct | Reading |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan (65) |
Northampton | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| 25 Oct | Reading |
1:1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Patrick McCarthy (61) 1-1 Kamari Doyle (68) |
Doncaster | - | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 6 Nov | Reading |
1:0
1-0 Charlie Savage (4) |
Stevenage | - | + | - | 1-0 |
|
| 22 Nov | Reading |
1:1
0-1 J. Benson (20) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Charlie Savage (78) |
Rotherham | - | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| 29 Nov | Blackpool |
0:3
0-1 Kamari Doyle (28) --------------------------------------- 0-2 Lewis Wing (69) pen. 0-3 Randell Williams (81) |
Reading | + | + | - | 0-1 |
|
| 9 Dec | Reading |
1:2
0-1 Jimmy Morgan (2) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan (60) 1-2 Harry Leonard (68) |
Peterborough | + | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| 13 Dec | Bradford |
2:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Antoni Sarcevic (56) 2-0 Bobby Pointon (84) |
Reading | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 18 Dec | Reading |
3:2
1-0 Lewis Wing (8) pen. --------------------------------------- 2-0 Jack Marriott (52) 2-1 Jordan Clark (59) 2-2 Nigel Cello Lonwijk (76) 3-2 Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan (78) |
Luton Town | + | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 26 Dec | Plymouth |
1:4
0-1 Lewis Wing (14) pen. 0-2 Lewis Wing (18) 0-3 Kamari Doyle (20) --------------------------------------- 1-3 X. Amaechi (68) 1-4 Jack Marriott (86) |
Reading | + | - | - | 0-3 |
|
| 29 Dec | Peterborough |
1:1
0-1 Daniel Kyerewaa (26) --------------------------------------- 1-1 G. Lindgren (78) |
Reading | - | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| 1 Jan | Reading |
2:0
1-0 Jack Marriott (18) 2-0 Daniel Kyerewaa (37) |
Burton Albion | - | + | - | 2-0 |
|
| 4 Jan | Reading |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Lewis Wing (89) |
Stockport | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| 17 Jan | Leyton Orient |
3:1
1-0 Dominic Ballard (45) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Jack Marriott (52) 2-1 Dominic Ballard (65) 3-1 Dominic Ballard (85) |
Reading | + | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 24 Jan | Reading |
2:2
1-0 Haydon Roberts (32) 1-1 David McGoldrick (38) --------------------------------------- 1-2 A. Phillips (67) 2-2 Jack Marriott (84) |
Barnsley | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 27 Jan | Reading |
2:2
0-1 P. Sweeney (14) 1-1 Will Keane (45) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Paudie OConnor (75) 2-2 Luca Woodhouse (90) |
Exeter City | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 31 Jan | Northampton |
0:2
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Jack Marriott (55) 0-2 Will Keane (58) |
Reading | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| 7 Feb | AFC Wimbledon |
3:2
1-0 Marcus Browne (8) 1-1 Jack Marriott (33) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Marcus Browne (53) 2-2 Jeriel Dorsett (65) 3-2 Marcus Browne (71) |
Reading | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 10 Feb | Wigan Athletic |
1:2
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Jeriel Dorsett (48) 1-1 Joe Taylor (66) 1-2 Paudie OConnor (87) |
Reading | + | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 14 Feb | Reading |
3:2
1-0 Jack Marriott (8) 2-0 Jack Marriott (44) --------------------------------------- 2-1 D. Casey (50) 2-2 Anders Hagelskjr (72) 3-2 Jack Marriott (74) |
Wycombe | + | - | - | 2-0 |
|
| 17 Feb | Reading |
1:1
1-0 Jack Marriott (36) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Mason Burstow (90) |
Bolton | - | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 21 Feb | Port Vale |
1:1
0-1 Lewis Wing (39) pen. --------------------------------------- 1-1 Martin Sherif (90) |
Reading | - | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| 28 Feb | Reading |
2:1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 Matthew Pennington (68) 1-1 Paddy Lane (90) 2-1 Matt Ritchie (90) |
Bradford | + | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 7 Mar | Luton Town |
2:3
0-1 Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan (5) 1-1 Nigel Cello Lonwijk (45) --------------------------------------- 2-1 George Saville (53) 2-2 Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan (81) 2-3 Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan (84) |
Reading | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 10 Mar | Mansfield |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 L. Reed (69) |
Reading | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 14 Mar | Reading |
2:2
1-0 Randell Williams (3) 1-1 Alex Mitchell (6) 2-1 Paudie OConnor (18) --------------------------------------- 2-2 C. Watts (67) |
Plymouth | + | - | - | 2-1 |
|
| 17 Mar | Burton Albion |
1:2
1-0 George Evans (25) 1-1 Kamari Doyle (33) --------------------------------------- 1-2 Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan (88) |
Reading | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 21 Mar | Stevenage |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 D. Kemp (85) |
Reading | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 28 Mar | Reading |
3:0
1-0 Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan (9) 2-0 Will Aimson (o.g.) (19) --------------------------------------- 3-0 Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan (63) |
Wigan Athletic | + | + | - | 2-0 |
|
| 3 Apr | Huddersfield |
1:1
0-1 Lewis Wing (44) pen. --------------------------------------- 1-1 Lasse Srensen (90) |
Reading | - | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| 6 Apr | Reading |
1:2
0-1 Ryan On (5) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Lewis Wing (90) 1-2 Jack Moylan (90) |
Lincoln City | + | - | - | 0-1 |
|
| Filter Reading results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 11 Apr | Doncaster vs Reading | 1.45 | 1.19 | |||
| 18 Apr | Reading vs Cardiff City | 1.76 | 1.70 | |||
| 25 Apr | Rotherham vs Reading | 1.30 | 1.19 | |||
| 2 May | Reading vs Blackpool | 1.76 | 0.62 | |||
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.27 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
Run-in overview | ||||||
|
Of their 4 remaining matches in the English League One, Reading will be playing as many matches at home and away (2 in each case).
Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, Reading's remaining away matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining home matches.
Reading's opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 1.16 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that Reading will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 1.38 Points Per Game at home in the league. | ||||||
| View opponents PPG values for all teams | ||||||
| Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Player stats
| Player | Goals | Home | Away | Last | % team | Age | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
Jack Marriott | 16 | 9 | 7 | 17 Feb | 26% | 31 | stats |
|
Lewis Wing | 11 | 4 | 7 | 6 Apr | 18% | 30 | stats |
|
Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan | 9 | 5 | 4 | 28 Mar | 15% | 22 | stats |
|
Kamari Doyle | 4 | 1 | 3 | 17 Mar | 6% | 20 | stats |
 |
Paudie OConnor | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 Mar | 5% | 28 | stats |
 |
Daniel Kyerewaa | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 Jan | 5% | 24 | stats |
|
Will Keane | 2 | 1 | 1 | 31 Jan | 3% | 32 | stats |
|
Randell Williams | 2 | 1 | 1 | 14 Mar | 3% | 29 | stats |
|
Jeriel Dorsett | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 Feb | 3% | 23 | stats |
|
Paddy Lane | 2 | 2 | 0 | 28 Feb | 3% | 24 | stats |
|
Charlie Savage | 2 | 2 | 0 | 22 Nov | 3% | 22 | stats |
|
Haydon Roberts | 1 | 1 | 0 | 24 Jan | 2% | 23 | stats |
|
Matt Ritchie | 1 | 1 | 0 | 28 Feb | 2% | 36 | stats |
 |
Liam Fraser | 1 | 1 | 0 | 20 Sep | 2% | 27 | stats |
 |
Mamadi Camar | 1 | 0 | 1 | 23 Aug | 2% | 22 | stats |
|
Andre Garcia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 20 Aug | 2% | 18 | stats |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
Reading (42 matches) vs league average
Reading at home (21 matches) vs league average at home
Reading away (21 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reading goals statistics indicate an average of 1.48 goals scored per game so far this season, which is higher than the average number of 1.29 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in League One. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Reading | |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 22 / 42 | 52% | |
| Opponent scored first | 20 / 42 | 48% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 15 / 42 | 36% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 8 / 42 | 19% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 25.4 min. | 28% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 43.4 min. | 48% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 21.2 min. | 24% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Reading have been in the lead for an average duration of 25.4 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 21.2 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Reading | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 42 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 32 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 16 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 50% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 29 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 17 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 59% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 13 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 9 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
Reading have taken the lead 32 times and have conceded an equalizer on 16 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 29 times that Reading's opponents have taken the lead, Reading have managed to score an equalizer on 17 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 59%.
|
Reading | |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 12 / 21 | 57% | |
| Opponent scored first | 9 / 21 | 43% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 8 / 21 | 38% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 5 / 21 | 24% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 29.2 min. | 32% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 39.9 min. | 44% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 20.9 min. | 23% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Reading have been in the lead for an average duration of 29.2 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 20.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Reading | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 21 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 18 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 8 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 56% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 12 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 8 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 67% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 6 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 4 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Reading have taken the lead 18 times and have conceded an equalizer on 8 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 56% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 44%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 12 times that Reading's opponents have taken the lead when Reading were playing at home, Reading have managed to score an equalizer on 8 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 67%.
|
Reading | |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 10 / 21 | 48% | |
| Opponent scored first | 11 / 21 | 52% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 7 / 21 | 33% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 3 / 21 | 14% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 21.5 min. | 24% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 46.9 min. | 52% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 21.6 min. | 24% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Reading have been in the lead for an average duration of 21.5 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 21.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Reading | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 21 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 14 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 8 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 43% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 17 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 9 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 53% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 7 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 5 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Reading have taken the lead 14 times and have conceded an equalizer on 8 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 43% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 57%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 17 times that Reading's opponents have taken the lead when Reading were playing away, Reading have managed to score an equalizer on 9 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 53%.
Results table
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 32 | 30 | 62 |
| GF per match | 1.52 | 1.43 | 1.48 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 24 | 30 | 54 |
| GA per match | 1.14 | 1.43 | 1.29 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.67 | 2.86 | 2.76 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 81% | 90% | 86% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 52% | 48% | 50% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 24% | 29% | 26% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 10% | 19% | 14% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 71% | 71% | 71% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 29% | 33% | 31% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 5% | 10% | 7% |
| Reading over 2.5 stats indicate a 50% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is lower than the league average value of 51% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in League One. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 29% | 10% | 19% |
| Won-to-nil | 29% | 10% | 19% |
| Failed to score | 5% | 19% | 12% |
| Lost-to-nil | 5% | 19% | 12% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 95% | 81% | 88% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 48% | 57% | 52% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 76% | 52% | 64% |
| Scored in both halves | 29% | 29% | 29% |
| Both teams scored | 67% | 71% | 69% |
| Conceding Rate | 71% | 90% | 81% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 38% | 43% | 40% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 62% | 76% | 69% |
| Conceded in both halves | 29% | 29% | 29% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 95% | 81% | 88% |
| GF over 1.5 | 43% | 43% | 43% |
| GF over 2.5 | 14% | 14% | 14% |
| GF over 3.5 | 0% | 5% | 2% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 71% | 90% | 81% |
| GA over 1.5 | 43% | 38% | 40% |
| GA over 2.5 | 0% | 14% | 7% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Reading matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 19% | 10% | 14% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 29% | 43% | 36% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 29% | 19% | 24% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 14% | 10% | 12% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 10% | 19% | 14% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 19% | 10% | 14% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 57% | 62% | 60% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 24% | 29% | 26% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Away wins | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 11 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
|
A majority of Reading's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (11 wins), while 5 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more. A majority of Reading's defeats had a one-goal margin (8 defeats), while 4 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more. |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 60% | 40% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | |
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.76 |
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.19 |
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | +0.57 |
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 52% | 48% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 44% | 56% | ||
| League average | 58% | 42% | ||
|
Matches played at home have accounted for 60% of Reading's total points and 52% of the goals they have scored so far this season in League One. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 8 | 7 | 15 | 36% |
| Drawing at HT | 8 | 11 | 19 | 45% |
| Losing at HT | 5 | 3 | 8 | 19% |
| Total | 21 | 21 | 42 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Corners For
| Avg | 2.5+ | 3.5+ | 4.5+ | 5.5+ | 6.5+ | |
| Home | 3.62 | 71% | 52% | 29% | 10% | 10% |
| Away | 4.14 | 71% | 48% | 33% | 24% | 19% |
| Total | 3.88 | 71% | 50% | 31% | 17% | 14% |
Corners Against
| Avg | 2.5+ | 3.5+ | 4.5+ | 5.5+ | 6.5+ | |
| Home | 5.33 | 100% | 71% | 67% | 48% | 19% |
| Away | 5.48 | 95% | 76% | 57% | 33% | 24% |
| Total | 5.40 | 98% | 74% | 62% | 40% | 21% |
Total corners (team + opponents)
| Avg | 9.5+ | 10.5+ | 11.5+ | 12.5+ | 13.5+ | |
| Home | 8.95 | 33% | 29% | 19% | 10% | 10% |
| Away | 9.62 | 43% | 38% | 38% | 19% | 14% |
| Total | 9.29 | 38% | 33% | 29% | 14% | 12% |
| The average of 9.29 total corners for Reading refers to how the corner stats evaluate the total number of corners per match (corners awarded + corners conceded) in matches involving the team this season in League One. | ||||||
| Corner Stats for all teams | ||||||
Goal times
|
Reading |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 13 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 10 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 11 | ||
| GA | 15 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 16 | ||
| GA | 12 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 29 | 47% | |
| GA | 17 | 31% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 33 | 53% | |
| GA | 37 | 69% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 51 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 54 |
|
Reading |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 9 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 14 | 44% | |
| GA | 8 | 33% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 18 | 56% | |
| GA | 16 | 67% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 52 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 53 |
|
Reading |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 7 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 15 | 50% | |
| GA | 9 | 30% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 15 | 50% | |
| GA | 21 | 70% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 50 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 55 |
Reading scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Reading score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-1 so far (6 times).
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| This season in the league |
|
Reading failed to keep a clean sheet in 15 of their 21 home matches. Reading have scored in 20 of their 21 home matches. Reading failed to keep a clean sheet in 19 of their 21 away matches. Reading have scored in each of their last 20 home matches. Reading failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 8 away matches. View comments for all teams |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsMatch total goals stats
Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)
Match total goals stats (at home)
Match total goals stats (away)
Example
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
