SoccerSTATS.com back to top
LEAGUES MATCHES STATS FAV BLOG LOGIN






advertisement
latvia
Latvia - Virsliga
LATEST MATCHES FORM TABLES HEAD-TO-HEAD GOALS HALF-TIME TIMING FIRST GOAL FAVOURITE STATS
🔍

Tukums vs RFS

advertisement


Visual table

  GP Pts
1  Riga FC 21 54
2  RFS 22 52
3  Liepaja 22 35
4  Auda 21 34
5  Daugavpils 21 26
6  FS Jelgava 21 24
7  Grobina 21 19
8  Super Nova 21 18
9  Tukums 21 18
10  Metta 21 14

 
Sun 25 May 2025
Tukums2 5RFS
0:1 Darko Lemajic (26)
0:2 Mor Talla Gaye (37)
0:3 Yukiyoshi Karashima (45)
Arturs Krancmanis (50) 1:3
Bogdans Samoilovs (52) 2:3
2:4 Darko Lemajic (68)
2:5 Janis Ikaunieks (90)






Seasonal streaks


2nd consecutive defeat for Tukums.
2nd consecutive win for RFS.
3rd consecutive home game where Tukums scored.
8th consecutive away game where RFS conceded.
6th consecutive game where RFS scored.
5th consecutive away game where RFS scored.
3rd consecutive game where Tukums conceded.
 

 
Lead durations in 90 minutes of regular time
090
TukumsLevel (26)RFS (64)
Lead durations tables
  How are the duration values calculated?

To calculate the above duration values based on a total of 90 minutes, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are considered scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are considered scored on the 90th minute.


Outcome Surprise-Level

Points Per Game (before the match)
Tukums
at home
RFS
away
Total
1.501.863.36


OutcomeOutcome surprise-level
(any scoreline)(Losing team PPG / Total) * 100
Away win
44.7
Scale: from 0 (less surprising) to 100 (more surprising)

Outcome Surprise-levels

More information on the calculation of the Outcome surprise-level is outlined in the following blog article:
Evaluating surprising results







 






 flag

Tukums

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 10 2 4 4  
  Away 11 2 2 7  
  Total 21 4 6 11  
PPG (Home): 1.00
PPG (Away): 0.73
Points per game: 0.86

Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game0.86 0.88 +2.3%
AVG Goals For1.10 1.38 +25.5%
AVG Goals Against1.86 2.38 +28.0%



Tukums' progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
7 Mar Daugavpils 3 - 0

1-0   Davis Cucurs (27)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Davis Cucurs (64)

3-0   Glebs Mihalcovs (85)
Tukums + - + 1-0 stats
12 Mar Liepaja 0 - 0

Tukums - + + 0-0 stats
16 Mar Metta 3 - 2

     0-1   Niks Dusalijevs (12)

1-1   Kristofers Rekis (16)

     1-2   Raivis Kirss (43)

---------------------------------------
2-2   Markuss Ivulans (53)

3-2   Emils Evelons (60)
Tukums + - - 1-2 stats
31 Mar Tukums 2 - 2

     0-1   Ruslans Deružinskis (23)

1-1   Ingars Pulis (37)

2-1   Ingars Pulis (42)

---------------------------------------
     2-2   Jevgenijs Minins (76) pen.
Super Nova + - - 2-1 stats
5 Apr Tukums 2 - 0

1-0   Niks Dusalijevs (4)

2-0   Ingars Pulis (8) pen.

Grobina - + - 2-0 stats
9 Apr RFS 2 - 0

1-0   J. Porsan-Clemente (28)

2-0   Stefan Panic (45) pen.

Tukums - - + 2-0 stats
13 Apr Tukums 0 - 3

     0-1   Anthony Contreras (27)

     0-2   Reginaldo Ramires (40)

---------------------------------------
     0-3   Eduards Daskevics (71)
Riga FC + - + 0-2 stats
18 Apr Auda 2 - 0

1-0   Matheus Clemente (24)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Steevenson Jeudy (51)
Tukums - - + 1-0 stats
23 Apr FS Jelgava 2 - 1

     0-1   Ingars Pulis (27)

---------------------------------------
1-1   Rihards Becers (83)

2-1   Rihards Becers (85)
Tukums + - - 0-1 stats
30 Apr Tukums 0 - 0

Daugavpils - + + 0-0 stats
6 May Tukums 2 - 2

1-0   Niks Dusalijevs (16)

     1-1   Bruno Melnis (28)

2-1   Ingars Pulis (45)

---------------------------------------
     2-2   Kyvon Leidsman (77)
Liepaja + - - 2-1 stats
11 May Tukums 2 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Ingars Pulis (52)

2-0   C. Kouoh (84)
Metta - + - 0-0 stats
16 May Super Nova 1 - 1

     0-1   Ingars Pulis (43)

---------------------------------------
1-1   Ryuga Nakamura (82) pen.
Tukums - - - 0-1 stats
21 May Grobina 2 - 0

1-0   Devids Dobrecovs (31) pen.

---------------------------------------
2-0   Olgerts Rascevskis (79)
Tukums - - + 1-0 stats
25 May Tukums 2 - 5

     0-1   Darko Lemajic (26)

     0-2   Mor Talla Gaye (37)

     0-3   Yukiyoshi Karashima (45)

---------------------------------------
1-3   Arturs Krancmanis (50)

2-3   Bogdans Samoilovs (52)

     2-4   Darko Lemajic (68)

     2-5   Janis Ikaunieks (90)
RFS + - - 0-3 stats
31 May Riga FC 3 - 0

1-0   Joao Grimaldo (8)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Reginaldo Ramires (53)

3-0   Orlando Galo (90)
Tukums + - + 1-0 stats
13 Jun Tukums 2 - 4

1-0   Niks Dusalijevs (9)

     1-1   Oskars Rubenis (20)

     1-2   Kemelho Nguena (36)

---------------------------------------
     1-3   Kemelho Nguena (50) pen.

2-3   Raivis Kirss (68)

     2-4   Kemelho Nguena (71) pen.
Auda + - - 1-2 stats
17 Jun Tukums 1 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   V. Promise (50)

1-1   Ingars Pulis (85)
FS Jelgava - - - 0-0 stats
21 Jun Daugavpils 1 - 2

     0-1   Rudolfs Reingolcs (40)

     0-2   Ingars Pulis (45) pen.

---------------------------------------
1-2   Raivis Skrebels (90)
Tukums + - - 0-2 stats
25 Jun Tukums 1 - 3

     0-1   Kirils Iljins (14)

     0-2   Danila Patijcuks (27)

---------------------------------------
1-2   Ingars Pulis (70)

     1-3   Djibril Gueye (90)
Liepaja + - - 0-2 stats
2 Jul Metta 0 - 3

     0-1   Ingars Pulis (33)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Maroine Mihoubi (86)

     0-3   C. Kouoh (89)
Tukums + + - 0-1 stats



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
6 Jul Super Nova h2h Tukums 1.00 0.73
21 Jul Tukums h2h Grobina 1.00 0.45
27 Jul RFS h2h Tukums 2.73 0.73
3 Aug Tukums h2h Riga FC 1.00 2.80
10 Aug Tukums h2h Auda 1.00 1.36
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.67

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins -21
Consecutive draws ---
Consecutive defeats 1--
No win 4--
No draw 143
No defeat -21
1 goal scored or more 625
1 goal conceded or more 4--
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded -11
GF+GA over 2.5 133
GF+GA under 2.5 ---
Scored at least twice -21










Comparison with league average


Tukums (21 matches) compared to league average

(overall)Tukums League AVG
Points per game  0.86 1.39
% Wins  19% 39%
% Draws  29% 23%
% Defeats  52% 39%
Goals scored per game  1.10 1.44
Goals conceded per game  1.86 1.44
% Clean sheets  24% 26%
% Failed To Score  38% 26%
% Won To Nil  14% 21%
% Lost To Nil  29% 21%
% Team scored first  43% 48%
% Opponent scored first  48% 48%
Average minute scored first  26 31
Average minute conceded first  26 31
Lead-defending rate  33% 65%
Equalizing rate  15% 35%
% Time leading  23% 27%
% Time level in goals  42% 46%
% Time trailing  36% 27%
PPG when scored first  1.56 2.21
PPG when conceded first  0.20 0.60
Total goals per game  2.95 2.88
% over 1.5 goals  90% 79%
% over 2.5 goals  57% 51%
% over 3.5 goals  29% 31%
% both teams scored  48% 53%

Tukums at home (10 matches) compared to league average at home

(home matches)Tukums League AVG
Points per game  1.00 1.70
% Wins  20% 49%
% Draws  40% 23%
% Defeats  40% 28%
Goals scored per game  1.40 1.65
Goals conceded per game  2.00 1.23
% Clean sheets  30% 36%
% Failed To Score  20% 16%
% Won To Nil  20% 31%
% Lost To Nil  10% 11%
% Team scored first  40% 52%
% Opponent scored first  50% 43%
Average minute scored first  20 33
Average minute conceded first  28 29
Lead-defending rate  33% 72%
Equalizing rate  33% 45%
% Time leading  24% 32%
% Time level in goals  42% 46%
% Time trailing  34% 23%
PPG when scored first  1.75 2.44
PPG when conceded first  0.40 0.89
Total goals per game  3.40 2.88
% over 1.5 goals  90% 79%
% over 2.5 goals  60% 51%
% over 3.5 goals  50% 31%
% both teams scored  60% 53%

Tukums away (11 matches) compared to league average away

(away matches)Tukums League AVG
Points per game  0.73 1.08
% Wins  18% 28%
% Draws  18% 23%
% Defeats  64% 49%
Goals scored per game  0.82 1.23
Goals conceded per game  1.73 1.65
% Clean sheets  18% 16%
% Failed To Score  55% 36%
% Won To Nil  9% 11%
% Lost To Nil  45% 31%
% Team scored first  45% 43%
% Opponent scored first  45% 52%
Average minute scored first  31 29
Average minute conceded first  24 33
Lead-defending rate  33% 55%
Equalizing rate  0% 28%
% Time leading  22% 23%
% Time level in goals  41% 46%
% Time trailing  37% 32%
PPG when scored first  1.40 1.93
PPG when conceded first  0.00 0.36
Total goals per game  2.55 2.88
% over 1.5 goals  91% 79%
% over 2.5 goals  55% 51%
% over 3.5 goals  9% 31%
% both teams scored  36% 53%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Tukums
 Leading & trailing stats (total) (this season in the league) 

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 9 / 21 43%
  Opponent scored first 10 / 21 48%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at half-time 8 / 21 38%
  Opponent was leading at half-time 9 / 21 43%

  LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 20.4 min. 23%
  Average minutes level in goals 37.5 min. 42%
  Average minutes trailing 32.0 min. 36%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Tukums have been in the lead for an average duration of 20.4 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 32.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Tukums
 Equalizer goals (total) (this season in the league) 

  Matches played 21

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 12
  Equalizer goals conceded 8
  Lead defending rate * (1) 33%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  Goals giving the lead to the opponent 13
  Equalizer goals scored 2
  Equalizing rate * (2) 15%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 9
  Non-crucial goals conceded 18

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Tukums have taken the lead 12 times and have conceded an equalizer on 8 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 33% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 67%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 13 times that Tukums's opponents have taken the lead, Tukums have managed to score an equalizer on 2 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 15%.


 flag Tukums
 Leading & trailing stats (home) (this season in the league, home matches) 

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 4 / 10 40%
  Opponent scored first 5 / 10 50%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at half-time 3 / 10 30%
  Opponent was leading at half-time 4 / 10 40%

  LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 21.3 min. 24%
  Average minutes level in goals 38.1 min. 42%
  Average minutes trailing 30.6 min. 34%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Tukums have been in the lead for an average duration of 21.3 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 30.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Tukums
 Equalizer goals (home) (this season in the league, home matches) 

  Matches played 10

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 6
  Equalizer goals conceded 4
  Lead defending rate * (1) 33%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  Goals giving the lead to the opponent 6
  Equalizer goals scored 2
  Equalizing rate * (2) 33%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 6
  Non-crucial goals conceded 10

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Tukums have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 33% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 67%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 6 times that Tukums's opponents have taken the lead when Tukums were playing at home, Tukums have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 33%.



 flag Tukums
 Leading & trailing stats (away) (this season in the league, away matches) 

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 5 / 11 45%
  Opponent scored first 5 / 11 45%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at half-time 5 / 11 45%
  Opponent was leading at half-time 5 / 11 45%

  LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 19.6 min. 22%
  Average minutes level in goals 37.0 min. 41%
  Average minutes trailing 33.4 min. 37%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Tukums have been in the lead for an average duration of 19.6 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 33.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Tukums
 Equalizer goals (away) (this season in the league, away matches) 

  Matches played 11

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 6
  Equalizer goals conceded 4
  Lead defending rate * (1) 33%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  Goals giving the lead to the opponent 7
  Equalizer goals scored 0
  Equalizing rate * (2) 0%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 3
  Non-crucial goals conceded 8

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Tukums have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 33% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 67%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 7 times that Tukums's opponents have taken the lead when Tukums were playing away, Tukums have managed to score an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 0%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Riga FC 21 54 0 - 3 3 - 0 h2h
   
2 RFS 22 52 2 - 5 2 - 0 h2h
   
3 Liepaja 22 35 2 - 2 0 - 0 h2h
1 - 3  
4 Auda 21 34 2 - 4 2 - 0 h2h
   
5 Daugavpils 21 26 0 - 0 3 - 0 h2h
  1 - 2
6 FS Jelgava 21 24 1 - 1 2 - 1 h2h
   
7 Grobina 21 19 2 - 0 2 - 0 h2h
   
8 Super Nova 21 18 2 - 2 1 - 1 h2h
   
9 Tukums 21 18
10 Metta 21 14 2 - 0 3 - 2 h2h
  0 - 3








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 14 923
GF per match 1.400.82 1.10
Goals conceded (GA) 201939
GA per match 2.001.73 1.86
GF + GA per match 3.402.552.95
GF+GA over 0.5 90%91%90%
GF+GA over 1.5 90%91%90%
GF+GA over 2.5 60%55%57%
GF+GA over 3.5 50%9%29%
GF+GA over 4.5 20%9%14%
GF+GA over 5.5 20%0%10%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 70%91%81%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 70%27%48%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 40%9%24%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 30%18%24%
Won-to-nil 20%9%14%
Failed to score 20%55%38%
Lost-to-nil 10%45%29%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 80%45%62%
Scoring Rate 1st-Half 40%45%43%
Scoring Rate 2nd-Half 50%9%29%
Scored in both halves 10%9%10%
Both teams scored 60%36%48%
Conceding Rate 70%82%76%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 60%55%57%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 70%73%71%
Conceded in both halves 60%45%52%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 80%45%62%
GF over 1.5 60%27%43%
GF over 2.5 0%9%5%
GF over 3.5 0%0%0%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 70%82%76%
GA over 1.5 60%64%62%
GA over 2.5 40%27%33%
GA over 3.5 20%0%10%
GA over 4.5 10%0%5%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Tukums matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 10%9%10%
Match total goals = 1 0%0%0%
Match total goals = 2 30%36%33%
Match total goals = 3 10%45%29%
Match total goals = 4 30%0%14%
Match total goals = 5+ 20%9%14%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 10%9%10%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 40%82%62%
Match total goals = 4+ 50%9%29%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  02 00
Away wins  10 10
Home & Away wins  12 10
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  02 20
Away defeats  23 20
Home & Away defeats  25 40


A majority of Tukums' wins have been obtained with a margin of 2 goals or more (3 wins), while 1 of their wins had a one-goal margin.

A majority of Tukums' defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (9 defeats), while 2 of their defeats had a one-goal margin.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 56%
44%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.00
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)0.73
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored (GF) 61%
39%
  % Goals conceded (GA) 51%
49%
  League average (% goals) 57%
43%








Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 35 8  38%
Drawing at HT 31 4  19%
Losing at HT 45 9  43%
  Total 101121







Goal times


 flag Tukums
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 4
GA 2
16-30 GF 2
GA 10
31-45 GF 8
GA 6
46-60 GF 3
GA 6
61-75 GF 2
GA 4
76-90 GF 4
GA 11
1st Half GF 14
61%
GA 18
46%
2nd Half GF 9
39%
GA 21
54%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 45
 Avg. minute goals conceded 52


  Tukums
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 3
GA 1
16-30 GF 1
GA 6
31-45 GF 3
GA 4
46-60 GF 3
GA 2
61-75 GF 2
GA 3
76-90 GF 2
GA 4
1st Half GF 7
50%
GA 11
55%
2nd Half GF 7
50%
GA 9
45%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 44
  Avg. minute goals conceded 48


  Tukums
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 1
GA 1
16-30 GF 1
GA 4
31-45 GF 5
GA 2
46-60 GF 0
GA 4
61-75 GF 0
GA 1
76-90 GF 2
GA 7
1st Half GF 7
78%
GA 7
37%
2nd Half GF 2
22%
GA 12
63%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 46
  Avg. minute goals conceded 55








Tukums scores

FT at home
2-2 2 20%
2-0 2 20%
2-5 1 10%
2-4 1 10%
1-3 1 10%
0-3 1 10%
1-1 1 10%
0-0 1 10%
FT away
2-0 3 27%
3-0 2 18%
0-3 1 9%
3-2 1 9%
1-2 1 9%
2-1 1 9%
1-1 1 9%
0-0 1 9%
The Tukums score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 2-0 so far (3 times).
Half-time at home
0-0 3 30%
0-2 2 20%
2-1 2 20%
0-3 1 10%
1-2 1 10%
2-0 1 10%
Half-time away
1-0 4 36%
0-1 3 27%
1-2 1 9%
0-2 1 9%
2-0 1 9%
0-0 1 9%




This season in the league
Tukums have scored 61% of their goals in the first half.


 flag

Rigas FS

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 11 10 0 1  
  Away 11 7 1 3  
  Total 22 17 1 4  
PPG (Home): 2.73
PPG (Away): 2.00
Points per game: 2.36

Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game2.36 2.63 +11.4%
AVG Goals For2.41 3.13 +29.9%
AVG Goals Against0.91 1.00 +9.9%



RFS' progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
5 Mar Auda 1 - 2

     0-1   Niks Sliede (1)

     0-2   Darko Lemajic (14)

---------------------------------------
1-2   Matheus Clemente (58)
RFS + - - 0-2 stats
11 Mar RFS 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Darko Lemajic (90)
FS Jelgava - + - 0-0 stats
15 Mar Daugavpils 1 - 2

     0-1   Žiga Lipušcek (32)

     0-2   Darko Lemajic (39)

---------------------------------------
1-2   Maksims Kopilovs (73)
RFS + - - 0-2 stats
29 Mar RFS 4 - 1

     0-1   Djibril Gueye (11)

---------------------------------------
1-1   Yukiyoshi Karashima (47)

2-1   Darko Lemajic (48)

3-1   Janis Ikaunieks (54)

4-1   Lasha Odisharia (88)
Liepaja + - - 0-1 stats
4 Apr Metta 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Rudolfs Klavinskis (54)
RFS - - + 0-0 stats
9 Apr RFS 2 - 0

1-0   J. Porsan-Clemente (28)

2-0   Stefan Panic (45) pen.

Tukums - + - 2-0 stats
15 Apr Grobina 1 - 4

     0-1   Žiga Lipušcek (9)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Mor Talla Gaye (57)

1-2   Arwin Javad (69)

     1-3   J. Porsan-Clemente (74)

     1-4   Stefan Panic (84) pen.
RFS + - - 0-1 stats
20 Apr Super Nova 1 - 2

     0-1   Darko Lemajic (7)

1-1   Ralfs Šitjakovs (45)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   A. Kouadio (65)
RFS + - - 1-1 stats
26 Apr RFS 0 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Orlando Galo (81)
Riga FC - - + 0-0 stats
1 May RFS 1 - 0

1-0   Darko Lemajic (39)

Auda - + - 1-0 stats
5 May FS Jelgava 2 - 2

---------------------------------------
1-0   K. Emenike (76)

     1-1   Elvis Stuglis (83)

     1-2   Elvis Stuglis (84)

2-2   Arturs Janovskis (90)
RFS + - - 0-0 stats
9 May RFS 5 - 1

1-0   Darko Lemajic (12)

2-0   Darko Lemajic (16)

---------------------------------------
3-0   Darko Lemajic (62)

4-0   Mor Talla Gaye (71)

     4-1   Barthelemy Diedhiou (87)

5-1   Mor Talla Gaye (88)
Daugavpils + - - 2-0 stats
14 May Liepaja 2 - 1

1-0   Bruno Melnis (16)

     1-1   Mor Talla Gaye (24)

---------------------------------------
2-1   Joseph Oloko Ede (47)
RFS + - - 1-1 stats
20 May RFS 2 - 0

1-0   Dmitrijs Zelenkovs (3)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Stefan Panic (48)
Metta - + - 1-0 stats
25 May Tukums 2 - 5

     0-1   Darko Lemajic (26)

     0-2   Mor Talla Gaye (37)

     0-3   Yukiyoshi Karashima (45)

---------------------------------------
1-3   Arturs Krancmanis (50)

2-3   Bogdans Samoilovs (52)

     2-4   Darko Lemajic (68)

     2-5   Janis Ikaunieks (90)
RFS + - - 0-3 stats
31 May RFS 6 - 0

1-0   Darko Lemajic (6)

2-0   Janis Ikaunieks (12)

3-0   Janis Ikaunieks (19)

4-0   Elvis Stuglis (33)

---------------------------------------
5-0   Dmitrijs Zelenkovs (47)

6-0   Darko Lemajic (90)
Grobina + + - 4-0 stats
14 Jun RFS 2 - 1

     0-1   Ryuga Nakamura (7)

1-1   Mor Talla Gaye (32)

---------------------------------------
2-1   Darko Lemajic (90)
Super Nova + - - 1-1 stats
18 Jun Riga FC 3 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Janis Ikaunieks (51)

1-1   Ahmed Ankrah (54)

2-1   Marko Regža (88)

3-1   Ahmed Ankrah (90)
RFS + - - 0-0 stats
22 Jun RFS 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Petr Mareš (71)
Auda - + - 0-0 stats
26 Jun FS Jelgava 0 - 1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Janis Ikaunieks (56)
RFS - + - 0-0 stats
30 Jun Daugavpils 1 - 7

1-0   Maksims Kopilovs (6)

     1-1   Herdi Prenga (13)

     1-2   J. Porsan-Clemente (17)

---------------------------------------
     1-3   Yukiyoshi Karashima (54)

     1-4   Darko Lemajic (56)

     1-5   Janis Ikaunieks (59)

     1-6   Darko Lemajic (65)

     1-7   Roberts Melkis (75)
RFS + - - 1-2 stats
4 Jul RFS 2 - 1

1-0   Stefan Panic (45)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Darko Lemajic (63)

     2-1   Djibril Gueye (90)
Liepaja + - - 1-0 stats



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
19 Jul Metta h2h RFS 0.90 2.00
27 Jul RFS h2h Tukums 2.73 0.73
3 Aug Grobina h2h RFS 1.40 2.00
10 Aug RFS h2h Super Nova 2.73 0.70
Average of Opponent PPG values above 0.93

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins 724
Consecutive draws ---
Consecutive defeats ---
No win ---
No draw 11511
No defeat 724
1 goal scored or more 7813
1 goal conceded or more 112
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded ---
GF+GA over 2.5 112
GF+GA under 2.5 ---
Scored at least twice 112










Comparison with league average


RFS (22 matches) compared to league average

(overall)RFS League AVG
Points per game  2.36 1.39
% Wins  77% 39%
% Draws  5% 23%
% Defeats  18% 39%
Goals scored per game  2.41 1.44
Goals conceded per game  0.91 1.44
% Clean sheets  32% 26%
% Failed To Score  9% 26%
% Won To Nil  32% 21%
% Lost To Nil  9% 21%
% Team scored first  68% 48%
% Opponent scored first  32% 48%
Average minute scored first  32 31
Average minute conceded first  36 31
Lead-defending rate  85% 65%
Equalizing rate  56% 35%
% Time leading  47% 27%
% Time level in goals  44% 46%
% Time trailing  9% 27%
PPG when scored first  2.80 2.21
PPG when conceded first  1.43 0.60
Total goals per game  3.32 2.88
% over 1.5 goals  73% 79%
% over 2.5 goals  64% 51%
% over 3.5 goals  36% 31%
% both teams scored  59% 53%

RFS at home (11 matches) compared to league average at home

(home matches)RFS League AVG
Points per game  2.73 1.70
% Wins  91% 49%
% Draws  0% 23%
% Defeats  9% 28%
Goals scored per game  2.36 1.65
Goals conceded per game  0.45 1.23
% Clean sheets  55% 36%
% Failed To Score  9% 16%
% Won To Nil  55% 31%
% Lost To Nil  9% 11%
% Team scored first  73% 52%
% Opponent scored first  27% 43%
Average minute scored first  37 33
Average minute conceded first  33 29
Lead-defending rate  100% 72%
Equalizing rate  67% 45%
% Time leading  47% 32%
% Time level in goals  46% 46%
% Time trailing  7% 23%
PPG when scored first  3.00 2.44
PPG when conceded first  2.00 0.89
Total goals per game  2.82 2.88
% over 1.5 goals  64% 79%
% over 2.5 goals  45% 51%
% over 3.5 goals  27% 31%
% both teams scored  36% 53%

RFS away (11 matches) compared to league average away

(away matches)RFS League AVG
Points per game  2.00 1.08
% Wins  64% 28%
% Draws  9% 23%
% Defeats  27% 49%
Goals scored per game  2.45 1.23
Goals conceded per game  1.36 1.65
% Clean sheets  9% 16%
% Failed To Score  9% 36%
% Won To Nil  9% 11%
% Lost To Nil  9% 31%
% Team scored first  64% 43%
% Opponent scored first  36% 52%
Average minute scored first  26 29
Average minute conceded first  38 33
Lead-defending rate  70% 55%
Equalizing rate  50% 28%
% Time leading  48% 23%
% Time level in goals  42% 46%
% Time trailing  10% 32%
PPG when scored first  2.57 1.93
PPG when conceded first  1.00 0.36
Total goals per game  3.82 2.88
% over 1.5 goals  82% 79%
% over 2.5 goals  82% 51%
% over 3.5 goals  45% 31%
% both teams scored  82% 53%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag RFS
 Leading & trailing stats (total) (this season in the league) 

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 15 / 22 68%
  Opponent scored first 7 / 22 32%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at half-time 11 / 22 50%
  Opponent was leading at half-time 1 / 22 5%

  LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 42.7 min. 47%
  Average minutes level in goals 39.5 min. 44%
  Average minutes trailing 7.9 min. 9%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Rigas FS have been in the lead for an average duration of 42.7 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 7.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag RFS
 Equalizer goals (total) (this season in the league) 

  Matches played 22

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 20
  Equalizer goals conceded 3
  Lead defending rate * (1) 85%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  Goals giving the lead to the opponent 9
  Equalizer goals scored 5
  Equalizing rate * (2) 56%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 28
  Non-crucial goals conceded 8

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Rigas FS have taken the lead 20 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 85% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 15%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 9 times that RFS's opponents have taken the lead, RFS have managed to score an equalizer on 5 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 56%.


 flag RFS
 Leading & trailing stats (home) (this season in the league, home matches) 

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 8 / 11 73%
  Opponent scored first 3 / 11 27%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at half-time 6 / 11 55%
  Opponent was leading at half-time 1 / 11 9%

  LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 42.5 min. 47%
  Average minutes level in goals 41.1 min. 46%
  Average minutes trailing 6.4 min. 7%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, RFS have been in the lead for an average duration of 42.5 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 6.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag RFS
 Equalizer goals (home) (this season in the league, home matches) 

  Matches played 11

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 10
  Equalizer goals conceded 0
  Lead defending rate * (1) 100%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  Goals giving the lead to the opponent 3
  Equalizer goals scored 2
  Equalizing rate * (2) 67%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 14
  Non-crucial goals conceded 2

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, RFS have taken the lead 10 times and have conceded an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 100% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 0%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 3 times that RFS's opponents have taken the lead when RFS were playing at home, RFS have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 67%.



 flag RFS
 Leading & trailing stats (away) (this season in the league, away matches) 

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 7 / 11 64%
  Opponent scored first 4 / 11 36%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at half-time 5 / 11 45%
  Opponent was leading at half-time 0 / 11 0%

  LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 42.8 min. 48%
  Average minutes level in goals 37.8 min. 42%
  Average minutes trailing 9.4 min. 10%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, RFS have been in the lead for an average duration of 42.8 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 9.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag RFS
 Equalizer goals (away) (this season in the league, away matches) 

  Matches played 11

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 10
  Equalizer goals conceded 3
  Lead defending rate * (1) 70%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  Goals giving the lead to the opponent 6
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 50%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 14
  Non-crucial goals conceded 6

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, RFS have taken the lead 10 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 70% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 30%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 6 times that RFS's opponents have taken the lead when RFS were playing away, RFS have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 50%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Riga FC 21 54 0 - 1 3 - 1 h2h
   
2 RFS 22 52
3 Liepaja 22 35 4 - 1 2 - 1 h2h
2 - 1  
4 Auda 21 34 1 - 0 1 - 2 h2h
1 - 0  
5 Daugavpils 21 26 5 - 1 1 - 2 h2h
  1 - 7
6 FS Jelgava 21 24 1 - 0 2 - 2 h2h
  0 - 1
7 Grobina 21 19 6 - 0 1 - 4 h2h
   
8 Super Nova 21 18 2 - 1 1 - 2 h2h
   
9 Tukums 21 18 2 - 0 2 - 5 h2h
   
10 Metta 21 14 2 - 0 1 - 0 h2h
   

RFS stats rank the team in 2nd position in the Latvia - Virsliga table with 52 points, 2 points behind Riga FC and 17 points above Liepaja. The above table shows RFS results against each league opponent. The tables below provide additional statistics regarding RFS's season in the Latvian league.








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 26 2753
GF per match 2.362.45 2.41
Goals conceded (GA) 51520
GA per match 0.451.36 0.91
GF + GA per match 2.823.823.32
GF+GA over 0.5 100%100%100%
GF+GA over 1.5 64%82%73%
GF+GA over 2.5 45%82%64%
GF+GA over 3.5 27%45%36%
GF+GA over 4.5 27%27%27%
GF+GA over 5.5 18%18%18%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 73%64%68%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 36%55%45%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 9%18%14%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 55%9%32%
Won-to-nil 55%9%32%
Failed to score 9%9%9%
Lost-to-nil 9%9%9%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 91%91%91%
Scoring Rate 1st-Half 64%64%64%
Scoring Rate 2nd-Half 73%64%68%
Scored in both halves 45%36%41%
Both teams scored 36%82%59%
Conceding Rate 45%91%68%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 18%27%23%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 27%73%50%
Conceded in both halves 0%9%5%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 91%91%91%
GF over 1.5 64%64%64%
GF over 2.5 27%27%27%
GF over 3.5 27%27%27%
GF over 4.5 18%18%18%
GA over 0.5 45%91%68%
GA over 1.5 0%36%18%
GA over 2.5 0%9%5%
GA over 3.5 0%0%0%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in RFS matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 0%0%0%
Match total goals = 1 36%18%27%
Match total goals = 2 18%0%9%
Match total goals = 3 18%36%27%
Match total goals = 4 0%18%9%
Match total goals = 5+ 27%27%27%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 36%18%27%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 36%36%36%
Match total goals = 4+ 27%45%36%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  52 12
Away wins  40 21
Home & Away wins  92 33
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  10 00
Away defeats  21 00
Home & Away defeats  31 00


A majority of RFS' wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (9 wins), while 8 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more.

A majority of RFS' defeats had a one-goal margin (3 defeats), while 1 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 58%
42%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)2.73
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)2.00
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored (GF) 49%
51%
  % Goals conceded (GA) 25%
75%
  League average (% goals) 57%
43%








Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 65 11  50%
Drawing at HT 46 10  45%
Losing at HT 10 1  5%
  Total 111122







Goal times


 flag RFS
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 9
GA 3
16-30 GF 6
GA 1
31-45 GF 9
GA 1
46-60 GF 11
GA 6
61-75 GF 9
GA 2
76-90 GF 9
GA 7
1st Half GF 24
45%
GA 5
25%
2nd Half GF 29
55%
GA 15
75%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 48
 Avg. minute goals conceded 57


  RFS
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 4
GA 2
16-30 GF 3
GA 0
31-45 GF 5
GA 0
46-60 GF 5
GA 0
61-75 GF 4
GA 0
76-90 GF 5
GA 3
1st Half GF 12
46%
GA 2
40%
2nd Half GF 14
54%
GA 3
60%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 48
  Avg. minute goals conceded 55


  RFS
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 5
GA 1
16-30 GF 3
GA 1
31-45 GF 4
GA 1
46-60 GF 6
GA 6
61-75 GF 5
GA 2
76-90 GF 4
GA 4
1st Half GF 12
44%
GA 3
20%
2nd Half GF 15
56%
GA 12
80%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 48
  Avg. minute goals conceded 58








RFS scores

FT at home
1-0 3 27%
2-1 2 18%
2-0 2 18%
6-0 1 9%
5-1 1 9%
4-1 1 9%
0-1 1 9%
FT away
1-2 3 27%
2-5 1 9%
Other scores 1 9%
1-4 1 9%
2-2 1 9%
3-1 1 9%
2-1 1 9%
0-1 1 9%
1-0 1 9%
The RFS score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 1-0 so far (3 times). The RFS score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-2 so far (3 times).
Half-time at home
1-0 3 27%
0-0 3 27%
2-0 2 18%
1-1 1 9%
0-1 1 9%
4-0 1 9%
Half-time away
0-0 4 36%
0-2 2 18%
1-1 2 18%
0-3 1 9%
1-2 1 9%
0-1 1 9%




This season in the league
RFS have won 17 of their 22 matches. RFS have won 10 of their 11 home matches. RFS have won 7 of their 11 away matches. RFS have won their last 4 matches. RFS have scored in each of their last 13 matches. RFS have scored in 10 of their 11 home matches. RFS conceded at least one goal in 10 of their 11 away matches. RFS have scored in 10 of their 11 away matches. RFS have won their last 7 home matches. RFS have scored in each of their last 8 away matches. 35% of RFS's conceded goals occurred after the 75th minute.








Tables overview

League table

GP pts
Riga FC 21 54
RFS 22 52
Liepaja 22 35
Auda 21 34
Daugavpils 21 26
FS Jelgava 21 24
Grobina 21 19
Super Nova 21 18
Tukums 21 18
Metta 21 14

Form table (last 8)

GP pts
Riga FC 8 24
RFS 8 21
Liepaja 8 17
Auda 8 14
Daugavpils 8 9
Tukums 8 7
Grobina 8 7
Super Nova 8 6
FS Jelgava 8 5
Metta 8 2

Home

GP pts
RFS 11 30
Riga FC 11 26
Liepaja 11 22
FS Jelgava 11 20
Auda 10 19
Daugavpils 11 19
Grobina 10 14
Super Nova 11 11
Tukums 10 10
Metta 10 9

Away

GP pts
Riga FC 10 28
RFS 11 22
Auda 11 15
Liepaja 11 13
Tukums 11 8
Super Nova 10 7
Daugavpils 10 7
Metta 11 5
Grobina 11 5
FS Jelgava 10 4

Offence

GP GF
RFS 22 53
Riga FC 21 51
Liepaja 22 36
Auda 21 31
Daugavpils 21 30
Super Nova 21 25
Tukums 21 23
Grobina 21 20
FS Jelgava 21 19
Metta 21 17

Defence

GP GA
Riga FC 21 12
RFS 22 20
FS Jelgava 21 23
Auda 21 23
Super Nova 21 31
Liepaja 22 33
Tukums 21 39
Daugavpils 21 40
Grobina 21 41
Metta 21 43






Total Match Goals stats


Total match goals stats

Matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Daugavpils  21 3.33 95% 81% 62% 38% 33% 14% 71% 19% 14% 14% 10%
RFS  22 3.32 100% 73% 64% 36% 27% 18% 59% 32% 9% 32% 9%
Liepaja  22 3.14 91% 77% 59% 45% 23% 14% 55% 32% 23% 23% 14%
Riga FC  21 3.00 100% 90% 57% 29% 10% 10% 43% 57% 0% 57% 0%
Tukums  21 2.95 90% 90% 57% 29% 14% 10% 48% 24% 38% 14% 29%
Grobina  21 2.90 100% 86% 38% 29% 29% 10% 48% 19% 33% 19% 33%
Metta  21 2.86 95% 81% 48% 33% 19% 10% 43% 10% 52% 5% 48%
Super Nova  21 2.67 95% 86% 43% 29% 10% 5% 67% 14% 24% 10% 19%
Auda  21 2.57 95% 71% 48% 29% 10% 5% 52% 38% 14% 33% 10%
FS Jelgava  21 2.00 90% 57% 33% 14% 5% 0% 43% 14% 52% 5% 43%
League average 95.3% 79.2% 50.9% 31.1% 17.9% 9.4% 52.8% 25.9% 25.9% 21.2% 21.2%

Total match goals stats (last 8 matches)

Last 8 matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
RFS  8 4.13 100% 75% 75% 50% 38% 38% 62% 38% 0% 38% 0%
Daugavpils  8 3.75 100% 88% 62% 50% 38% 12% 88% 12% 0% 12% 0%
Tukums  8 3.75 100% 100% 75% 38% 25% 25% 62% 12% 25% 12% 25%
Grobina  8 2.88 100% 88% 38% 25% 25% 12% 38% 25% 38% 25% 38%
Metta  8 2.88 100% 88% 62% 25% 12% 0% 50% 0% 50% 0% 50%
Riga FC  8 2.88 100% 100% 62% 25% 0% 0% 25% 75% 0% 75% 0%
Auda  8 2.75 88% 62% 50% 38% 25% 12% 62% 25% 25% 12% 12%
Super Nova  8 2.38 88% 75% 38% 25% 12% 0% 62% 12% 38% 0% 25%
Liepaja  8 2.13 88% 62% 38% 25% 0% 0% 50% 50% 12% 38% 0%
FS Jelgava  8 1.50 88% 38% 25% 0% 0% 0% 25% 12% 75% 0% 62%
League average 95.0% 77.5% 52.5% 30.0% 17.5% 10.0% 52.5% 26.3% 26.3% 21.3% 21.3%

Total match goals stats (at home)

Home matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Tukums  10 3.40 90% 90% 60% 50% 20% 20% 60% 30% 20% 20% 10%
Daugavpils  11 3.36 100% 82% 64% 27% 27% 18% 64% 27% 9% 27% 9%
Grobina  10 3.00 100% 90% 40% 30% 30% 10% 60% 30% 10% 30% 10%
RFS  11 2.82 100% 64% 45% 27% 27% 18% 36% 55% 9% 55% 9%
Super Nova  11 2.82 91% 82% 45% 36% 18% 9% 73% 18% 18% 9% 9%
Auda  10 2.80 100% 90% 50% 30% 10% 0% 50% 50% 0% 50% 0%
Riga FC  11 2.73 100% 100% 55% 18% 0% 0% 36% 64% 0% 64% 0%
Metta  10 2.70 90% 70% 50% 30% 20% 10% 40% 20% 50% 10% 40%
Liepaja  11 2.64 82% 64% 45% 36% 18% 9% 45% 55% 18% 36% 0%
FS Jelgava  11 2.55 100% 64% 55% 27% 9% 0% 64% 9% 27% 9% 27%
League average 95.3% 79.2% 50.9% 31.1% 17.9% 9.4% 52.8% 35.8% 16.0% 31.1% 11.3%

Total match goals stats (away)

Away matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
RFS  11 3.82 100% 82% 82% 45% 27% 18% 82% 9% 9% 9% 9%
Liepaja  11 3.64 100% 91% 73% 55% 27% 18% 64% 9% 27% 9% 27%
Daugavpils  10 3.30 90% 80% 60% 50% 40% 10% 80% 10% 20% 0% 10%
Riga FC  10 3.30 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 20% 50% 50% 0% 50% 0%
Metta  11 3.00 100% 91% 45% 36% 18% 9% 45% 0% 55% 0% 55%
Grobina  11 2.82 100% 82% 36% 27% 27% 9% 36% 9% 55% 9% 55%
Tukums  11 2.55 91% 91% 55% 9% 9% 0% 36% 18% 55% 9% 45%
Super Nova  10 2.50 100% 90% 40% 20% 0% 0% 60% 10% 30% 10% 30%
Auda  11 2.36 91% 55% 45% 27% 9% 9% 55% 27% 27% 18% 18%
FS Jelgava  10 1.40 80% 50% 10% 0% 0% 0% 20% 20% 80% 0% 60%
League average 95.3% 79.2% 50.9% 31.1% 17.9% 9.4% 52.8% 16.0% 35.8% 11.3% 31.1%




Segments Table

0 pt Segments table progression arrow 54 pts
5th Segment 4th Segment 3rd Segment 2nd Segment 1st Segment
up to 10.4 pts from 10.5 to 21.3 pts from 21.4 to 32.2 pts from 32.3 to 43.1 pts from 43.2 to 54 pts
(21)  19  Grobina
(21)  18  Super Nova
(21)  18  Tukums
(21)  14  Metta
(21)  26  Daugavpils
(21)  24  FS Jelgava
(22)  35  Liepaja
(21)  34  Auda
(21)  54  Riga FC
(22)  52  RFS

The Segments Table is a visual representation splitting the teams into 5 segments. Each team is assigned to a specific segment, depending on the team's number of points. Each of the 5 segments spans one-fifth (20%) of the total points held by the team ranked 1st in the league. For each team, the number of matches played appears in green between brackets, and the number of points is displayed in black.








Sat 5 Jul
AUD - JEL
Sun 6 Jul
GRO - MET
Sun 6 Jul
SUP - TUK
Sun 6 Jul
RFC - DAU
Sat 19 Jul
LIE - RFC
Sat 19 Jul
MET - RFS
Sun 20 Jul
AUD - DAU
Sun 20 Jul
JEL - SUP




Latvia - Virsliga stats

106 matches played / 130
81.5% completed
Home wins:  49%
Over 1.5 goals:  79%
Draws:  23%
Over 2.5 goals:  51%
Away wins:  28%
Over 3.5 goals:  31%
Goals:  305 Home goals per match:  1.65
Goals per match:  2.88 Away goals per match:  1.23
    Both teams scored:  53%

Results

 Latest results
 Matches by date
 Matches by Matchweek
 Results grid
 Results filter
 Outcome Surprise-Levels

Tables

 Home / Away tables
 Wide table
 Form tables
 Stats by month
 Projected points

Analysis

 Goals statistics
 Points performance
 Over / Under
 Scored / Conceded
 Home advantage
 Relative form
 Run-in analysis

Goal times

 When goals were scored
 1st-half / 2nd-half
 First team to score
 Goal types
 Lead durations
 Points Won/Lost
Home team scored first: 52% No goal scored: 5% Away team scored first: 43%
Average minute when home team scored first: 33 min. Average minute when away team scored first: 29 min.
Home team lead-defending rate: 72% Away team lead-defending rate: 55%
Home team equalizing rate: 45% Away team equalizing rate: 28%
Home team lead duration: 32% Teams level in goals: 46% Away team lead duration: 23%
Home PPG when home team scored first: 2.44 Away PPG when away team scored first: 1.93

More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 106 matches played in the Latvian league, a total of 305 goals have been scored (2.88 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including Latvia - Virsliga results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded.

 

SoccerSTATS.com - Public edition

SoccerSTATS.com provides football statistics, results and blog articles on national and international soccer competitions worldwide. Football fans can keep a tab on stats related to their favourite team or leagues of interest, and access a wide range of team performance data analytics and league standings, not only on the world's most famous professional leagues, but also on amateur and regional leagues over the world. Example of soccer statistics include league standings, form tables, top goal scorers, scoring stats, statistical previews and goal timing statistics.
Follow us on Twitter
F.A.Q. Contact Privacy Policy Change consent
Terms & conditions of use About us Cookie usage and options
Mobile app

Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. Products, services, promotional offers and other offerings from partners and advertisers are subject to terms and conditions. By using this website you certify that you agree with the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy and that you are over the age of 18 or that you have the permission of a parent or guardian to use this website, after your parent or guardian has carefully reviewed and agreed to the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy. The website's content is provided for informational purposes only is not to be relied upon as a professional opinion whatsover. Nothing on this website should be considered as advice. This website is not associated with nor endorsed by any league or competition (whether professional, collegiate or other types of leagues / competitions), federation, association, club or team. All trademarks, brands, images, logos and names appearing on this website belong to their respective owners.
Useful links (third-party websites):   www.gamcare.org.uk       www.begambleaware.org        gamblingtherapy.org
   
Copyright 1998-2025 SoccerSTATS.com
back to top