SoccerSTATS.com back to top
LEAGUES MATCHES STATS FAV BLOG LOGIN






advertisement
latvia
Latvia - Virsliga
LATEST MATCHES FORM TABLES HEAD-TO-HEAD GOALS HALF-TIME TIMING FIRST GOAL FAVOURITE STATS
🔍

Tukums vs Metta

advertisement


Visual table

  GP Pts
1  Riga FC 17 42
2  RFS 17 40
3  Auda 17 28
4  FS Jelgava 17 23
5  Liepaja 17 23
6  Daugavpils 17 22
7  Super Nova 17 17
8  Grobina 17 16
9  Metta 17 12
10  Tukums 17 11

 
Sun 11 May 2025
Tukums2 0Metta
Ingars Pulis (52) 1:0
C. Kouoh (84) 2:0






Seasonal streaks


4th consecutive defeat for Metta.
2nd consecutive away defeat for Metta.
2nd consecutive game where Tukums scored.
2nd consecutive home game where Tukums scored.
4th consecutive game where Metta conceded.
6th consecutive away game where Metta conceded.
2nd consecutive game with no goal scored for Metta.
2nd consecutive away game with no goal scored for Metta.
 

 
Lead durations in 90 minutes of regular time
090
Tukums (38)Level (52)Metta
Lead durations tables
  How are the duration values calculated?

To calculate the above duration values based on a total of 90 minutes, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are considered scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are considered scored on the 90th minute.


Outcome Surprise-Level

Points Per Game (before the match)
Tukums
at home
Metta
away
Total
1.200.802.00


OutcomeOutcome surprise-level
(any scoreline)(Losing team PPG / Total) * 100
Home win
40.0
Scale: from 0 (less surprising) to 100 (more surprising)

Outcome Surprise-levels

More information on the calculation of the Outcome surprise-level is outlined in the following blog article:
Evaluating surprising results







 






 flag

Tukums

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 8 2 3 3  
  Away 9 0 2 7  
  Total 17 2 5 10  
PPG (Home): 1.13
PPG (Away): 0.22
Points per game: 0.65

Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game0.65 0.75 +15.4%
AVG Goals For0.94 1.13 +20.2%
AVG Goals Against2.00 2.13 +6.5%



Tukums' progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
7 Mar Daugavpils 3 - 0

1-0   Davis Cucurs (27)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Davis Cucurs (64)

3-0   Glebs Mihalcovs (85)
Tukums + - + 1-0 stats
12 Mar Liepaja 0 - 0

Tukums - + + 0-0 stats
16 Mar Metta 3 - 2

     0-1   Niks Dusalijevs (12)

1-1   Kristofers Rekis (16)

     1-2   Raivis Kirss (43)

---------------------------------------
2-2   Markuss Ivulans (53)

3-2   Emils Evelons (60)
Tukums + - - 1-2 stats
31 Mar Tukums 2 - 2

     0-1   Ruslans Deružinskis (23)

1-1   Ingars Pulis (37)

2-1   Ingars Pulis (42)

---------------------------------------
     2-2   Jevgenijs Minins (76) pen.
Super Nova + - - 2-1 stats
5 Apr Tukums 2 - 0

1-0   Niks Dusalijevs (4)

2-0   Ingars Pulis (8) pen.

Grobina - + - 2-0 stats
9 Apr RFS 2 - 0

1-0   J. Porsan-Clemente (28)

2-0   Stefan Panic (45) pen.

Tukums - - + 2-0 stats
13 Apr Tukums 0 - 3

     0-1   Anthony Contreras (27)

     0-2   Reginaldo Ramires (40)

---------------------------------------
     0-3   Eduards Daskevics (71)
Riga FC + - + 0-2 stats
18 Apr Auda 2 - 0

1-0   Matheus Clemente (24)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Steevenson Jeudy (51)
Tukums - - + 1-0 stats
23 Apr FS Jelgava 2 - 1

     0-1   Ingars Pulis (27)

---------------------------------------
1-1   Rihards Becers (83)

2-1   Rihards Becers (85)
Tukums + - - 0-1 stats
30 Apr Tukums 0 - 0

Daugavpils - + + 0-0 stats
6 May Tukums 2 - 2

1-0   Niks Dusalijevs (16)

     1-1   Bruno Melnis (28)

2-1   Ingars Pulis (45)

---------------------------------------
     2-2   Kyvon Leidsman (77)
Liepaja + - - 2-1 stats
11 May Tukums 2 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Ingars Pulis (52)

2-0   C. Kouoh (84)
Metta - + - 0-0 stats
16 May Super Nova 1 - 1

     0-1   Ingars Pulis (43)

---------------------------------------
1-1   Ryuga Nakamura (82) pen.
Tukums - - - 0-1 stats
21 May Grobina 2 - 0

1-0   Devids Dobrecovs (31) pen.

---------------------------------------
2-0   Olgerts Rascevskis (79)
Tukums - - + 1-0 stats
25 May Tukums 2 - 5

     0-1   Darko Lemajic (26)

     0-2   Mor Talla Gaye (37)

     0-3   Yukiyoshi Karashima (45)

---------------------------------------
1-3   Arturs Krancmanis (50)

2-3   Bogdans Samoilovs (52)

     2-4   Darko Lemajic (68)

     2-5   Janis Ikaunieks (90)
RFS + - - 0-3 stats
31 May Riga FC 3 - 0

1-0   Joao Grimaldo (8)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Reginaldo Ramires (53)

3-0   Orlando Galo (90)
Tukums + - + 1-0 stats
13 Jun Tukums 2 - 4

1-0   Niks Dusalijevs (9)

     1-1   Oskars Rubenis (20)

     1-2   Kemelho Nguena (36)

---------------------------------------
     1-3   Kemelho Nguena (50) pen.

2-3   Raivis Kirss (68)

     2-4   Kemelho Nguena (71) pen.
Auda + - - 1-2 stats



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
17 Jun Tukums h2h FS Jelgava 1.13 0.38
21 Jun Daugavpils h2h Tukums 2.00 0.22
25 Jun Tukums h2h Liepaja 1.13 0.88
2 Jul Metta h2h Tukums 1.00 0.22
6 Jul Super Nova h2h Tukums 1.25 0.22
21 Jul Tukums h2h Grobina 1.13 0.25
27 Jul RFS h2h Tukums 2.67 0.22
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.20

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins ---
Consecutive draws ---
Consecutive defeats 224
No win 295
No draw 324
No defeat ---
1 goal scored or more 4-1
1 goal conceded or more 275
No goal scored -2-
No goal conceded ---
GF+GA over 2.5 213
GF+GA under 2.5 ---
Scored at least twice 4-1










Comparison with league average


Tukums (17 matches) compared to league average

(overall)Tukums League AVG
Points per game  0.65 1.38
% Wins  12% 38%
% Draws  29% 25%
% Defeats  59% 38%
Goals scored per game  0.94 1.44
Goals conceded per game  2.00 1.44
% Clean sheets  24% 27%
% Failed To Score  47% 27%
% Won To Nil  12% 21%
% Lost To Nil  35% 21%
% Team scored first  41% 47%
% Opponent scored first  47% 47%
Average minute scored first  23 30
Average minute conceded first  24 30
Lead-defending rate  20% 64%
Equalizing rate  9% 36%
% Time leading  21% 28%
% Time level in goals  42% 45%
% Time trailing  37% 28%
PPG when scored first  1.14 2.19
PPG when conceded first  0.13 0.61
Total goals per game  2.94 2.87
% over 1.5 goals  88% 80%
% over 2.5 goals  53% 49%
% over 3.5 goals  29% 31%
% both teams scored  41% 52%

Tukums at home (8 matches) compared to league average at home

(home matches)Tukums League AVG
Points per game  1.13 1.80
% Wins  25% 52%
% Draws  38% 25%
% Defeats  38% 24%
Goals scored per game  1.50 1.74
Goals conceded per game  2.00 1.13
% Clean sheets  38% 39%
% Failed To Score  25% 15%
% Won To Nil  25% 33%
% Lost To Nil  12% 9%
% Team scored first  50% 55%
% Opponent scored first  38% 39%
Average minute scored first  20 32
Average minute conceded first  25 28
Lead-defending rate  33% 71%
Equalizing rate  25% 47%
% Time leading  30% 36%
% Time level in goals  43% 45%
% Time trailing  27% 19%
PPG when scored first  1.75 2.45
PPG when conceded first  0.33 1.00
Total goals per game  3.50 2.87
% over 1.5 goals  88% 80%
% over 2.5 goals  62% 49%
% over 3.5 goals  50% 31%
% both teams scored  50% 52%

Tukums away (9 matches) compared to league average away

(away matches)Tukums League AVG
Points per game  0.22 0.95
% Wins  0% 24%
% Draws  22% 25%
% Defeats  78% 52%
Goals scored per game  0.44 1.13
Goals conceded per game  2.00 1.74
% Clean sheets  11% 15%
% Failed To Score  67% 39%
% Won To Nil  0% 9%
% Lost To Nil  56% 33%
% Team scored first  33% 39%
% Opponent scored first  56% 55%
Average minute scored first  27 28
Average minute conceded first  24 32
Lead-defending rate  0% 53%
Equalizing rate  0% 29%
% Time leading  13% 19%
% Time level in goals  41% 45%
% Time trailing  45% 36%
PPG when scored first  0.33 1.82
PPG when conceded first  0.00 0.34
Total goals per game  2.44 2.87
% over 1.5 goals  89% 80%
% over 2.5 goals  44% 49%
% over 3.5 goals  11% 31%
% both teams scored  33% 52%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Tukums
 Leading & trailing stats (total) (this season in the league) 

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 7 / 17 41%
  Opponent scored first 8 / 17 47%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at half-time 6 / 17 35%
  Opponent was leading at half-time 8 / 17 47%

  LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 18.9 min. 21%
  Average minutes level in goals 38.0 min. 42%
  Average minutes trailing 33.1 min. 37%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Tukums have been in the lead for an average duration of 18.9 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 33.1 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Tukums
 Equalizer goals (total) (this season in the league) 

  Matches played 17

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 10
  Equalizer goals conceded 8
  Lead defending rate * (1) 20%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  Goals giving the lead to the opponent 11
  Equalizer goals scored 1
  Equalizing rate * (2) 9%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 5
  Non-crucial goals conceded 15

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Tukums have taken the lead 10 times and have conceded an equalizer on 8 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 20% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 80%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 11 times that Tukums's opponents have taken the lead, Tukums have managed to score an equalizer on 1 instance, translating into an equalizing rate of 9%.


 flag Tukums
 Leading & trailing stats (home) (this season in the league, home matches) 

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 4 / 8 50%
  Opponent scored first 3 / 8 38%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at half-time 3 / 8 38%
  Opponent was leading at half-time 3 / 8 38%

  LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 26.6 min. 30%
  Average minutes level in goals 39.0 min. 43%
  Average minutes trailing 24.4 min. 27%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Tukums have been in the lead for an average duration of 26.6 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 24.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Tukums
 Equalizer goals (home) (this season in the league, home matches) 

  Matches played 8

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 6
  Equalizer goals conceded 4
  Lead defending rate * (1) 33%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  Goals giving the lead to the opponent 4
  Equalizer goals scored 1
  Equalizing rate * (2) 25%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 5
  Non-crucial goals conceded 8

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Tukums have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 33% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 67%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 4 times that Tukums's opponents have taken the lead when Tukums were playing at home, Tukums have managed to score an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a home equalizing rate of 25%.



 flag Tukums
 Leading & trailing stats (away) (this season in the league, away matches) 

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 3 / 9 33%
  Opponent scored first 5 / 9 56%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at half-time 3 / 9 33%
  Opponent was leading at half-time 5 / 9 56%

  LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 12.1 min. 13%
  Average minutes level in goals 37.1 min. 41%
  Average minutes trailing 40.8 min. 45%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Tukums have been in the lead for an average duration of 12.1 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 40.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Tukums
 Equalizer goals (away) (this season in the league, away matches) 

  Matches played 9

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 4
  Equalizer goals conceded 4
  Lead defending rate * (1) 0%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  Goals giving the lead to the opponent 7
  Equalizer goals scored 0
  Equalizing rate * (2) 0%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 0
  Non-crucial goals conceded 7

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Tukums have taken the lead 4 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 0% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 100%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 7 times that Tukums's opponents have taken the lead when Tukums were playing away, Tukums have managed to score an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 0%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Riga FC 17 42 0 - 3 3 - 0 h2h
   
2 RFS 17 40 2 - 5 2 - 0 h2h
   
3 Auda 17 28 2 - 4 2 - 0 h2h
   
4 FS Jelgava 17 23   2 - 1 h2h
   
5 Liepaja 17 23 2 - 2 0 - 0 h2h
   
6 Daugavpils 17 22 0 - 0 3 - 0 h2h
   
7 Super Nova 17 17 2 - 2 1 - 1 h2h
   
8 Grobina 17 16 2 - 0 2 - 0 h2h
   
9 Metta 17 12 2 - 0 3 - 2 h2h
   
10 Tukums 17 11








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 12 416
GF per match 1.500.44 0.94
Goals conceded (GA) 161834
GA per match 2.002.00 2.00
GF + GA per match 3.502.442.94
GF+GA over 0.5 88%89%88%
GF+GA over 1.5 88%89%88%
GF+GA over 2.5 62%44%53%
GF+GA over 3.5 50%11%29%
GF+GA over 4.5 25%11%18%
GF+GA over 5.5 25%0%12%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 75%89%82%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 75%22%47%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 50%11%29%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 38%11%24%
Won-to-nil 25%0%12%
Failed to score 25%67%47%
Lost-to-nil 12%56%35%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 75%33%53%
Scoring Rate 1st-Half 50%33%41%
Scoring Rate 2nd-Half 38%0%18%
Scored in both halves 12%0%6%
Both teams scored 50%33%41%
Conceding Rate 62%89%76%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 62%67%65%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 62%78%71%
Conceded in both halves 62%56%59%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 75%33%53%
GF over 1.5 75%11%41%
GF over 2.5 0%0%0%
GF over 3.5 0%0%0%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 62%89%76%
GA over 1.5 62%78%71%
GA over 2.5 38%33%35%
GA over 3.5 25%0%12%
GA over 4.5 12%0%6%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Tukums matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 12%11%12%
Match total goals = 1 0%0%0%
Match total goals = 2 25%44%35%
Match total goals = 3 12%33%24%
Match total goals = 4 25%0%12%
Match total goals = 5+ 25%11%18%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 12%11%12%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 38%78%59%
Match total goals = 4+ 50%11%29%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  02 00
Away wins  00 00
Home & Away wins  02 00
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  01 20
Away defeats  23 20
Home & Away defeats  24 40


A majority of Tukums' defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (8 defeats), while 2 of their defeats had a one-goal margin.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 82%
18%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.13
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)0.22
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored (GF) 75%
25%
  % Goals conceded (GA) 47%
53%
  League average (% goals) 61%
39%








Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 33 6  35%
Drawing at HT 21 3  18%
Losing at HT 35 8  47%
  Total 8917







Goal times


 flag Tukums
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 4
GA 1
16-30 GF 2
GA 9
31-45 GF 5
GA 6
46-60 GF 3
GA 5
61-75 GF 1
GA 4
76-90 GF 1
GA 9
1st Half GF 11
69%
GA 16
47%
2nd Half GF 5
31%
GA 18
53%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 37
 Avg. minute goals conceded 51


  Tukums
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 3
GA 0
16-30 GF 1
GA 5
31-45 GF 3
GA 4
46-60 GF 3
GA 1
61-75 GF 1
GA 3
76-90 GF 1
GA 3
1st Half GF 7
58%
GA 9
56%
2nd Half GF 5
42%
GA 7
44%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 39
  Avg. minute goals conceded 49


  Tukums
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 1
GA 1
16-30 GF 1
GA 4
31-45 GF 2
GA 2
46-60 GF 0
GA 4
61-75 GF 0
GA 1
76-90 GF 0
GA 6
1st Half GF 4
100%
GA 7
39%
2nd Half GF 0
0%
GA 11
61%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 31
  Avg. minute goals conceded 54








Tukums scores

FT at home
2-2 2 25%
2-0 2 25%
2-5 1 12%
2-4 1 12%
0-3 1 12%
0-0 1 12%
FT away
2-0 3 33%
3-0 2 22%
3-2 1 11%
2-1 1 11%
1-1 1 11%
0-0 1 11%
The Tukums score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 2-0 so far (3 times).
Half-time at home
2-1 2 25%
0-0 2 25%
0-3 1 12%
1-2 1 12%
0-2 1 12%
2-0 1 12%
Half-time away
1-0 4 44%
0-1 2 22%
1-2 1 11%
2-0 1 11%
0-0 1 11%




This season in the league
Tukums have lost their last 4 matches. 82% of Tukums's points have been earned at home. Tukums have scored 75% of their goals at home. Tukums have scored 69% of their goals in the first half. Tukums have lost 7 of their 9 away matches. Tukums have failed to win in their last 9 away matches. Tukums have conceded 2 goals or more in each of their last 4 matches. Tukums have scored 25% of their goals in the first 15 minutes.


 flag

Metta

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 8 2 2 4  
  Away 9 1 1 7  
  Total 17 3 3 11  
PPG (Home): 1.00
PPG (Away): 0.44
Points per game: 0.71

Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game0.71 0.13 -81.7%
AVG Goals For0.82 0.63 -23.2%
AVG Goals Against2.12 2.50 +17.9%



Metta's progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
7 Mar Liepaja 4 - 0

1-0   Tresor Samba (16)

2-0   Anto Babic (30)

3-0   Vladislavs Sorokins (38)

---------------------------------------
4-0   Bruno Melnis (64)
Metta + - + 3-0 stats
12 Mar Super Nova 4 - 0

1-0   Dmytro Sula (36)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Agris Glaudans (49)

3-0   Mohamed Bai Kamara (o.g.) (74)

4-0   Ruslans Deružinskis (90)
Metta + - + 1-0 stats
16 Mar Metta 3 - 2

     0-1   Niks Dusalijevs (12)

1-1   Kristofers Rekis (16)

     1-2   Raivis Kirss (43)

---------------------------------------
2-2   Markuss Ivulans (53)

3-2   Emils Evelons (60)
Tukums + - - 1-2 stats
30 Mar Grobina 2 - 4

1-0   Denys Galata (27)

     1-1   Tomass Mickevics (o.g.) (29)

2-1   Arwin Javad (41)

     2-2   Kristofers Rekis (45)

---------------------------------------
     2-3   Markuss Ivulans (58)

     2-4   Mohamed Bai Kamara (67)
Metta + - - 2-2 stats
4 Apr Metta 1 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Rudolfs Klavinskis (54)
RFS - + - 0-0 stats
8 Apr Riga FC 1 - 1

---------------------------------------
1-0   Anthony Contreras (61)

     1-1   Alans Kangars (87)
Metta - - - 0-0 stats
13 Apr Metta 0 - 1

     0-1   Abiodun Ogunniyi (27)

Auda - - + 0-1 stats
18 Apr Metta 0 - 0

FS Jelgava - + + 0-0 stats
25 Apr Daugavpils 2 - 0

1-0   Lenards Berzins (o.g.) (8)

2-0   Aleksandrs Molotkovs (o.g.) (15)

Metta - - + 2-0 stats
2 May Metta 2 - 4

     0-1   Djibril Gueye (6)

     0-2   Marin Laušic (41)

---------------------------------------
     0-3   Kyvon Leidsman (60)

1-3   Markuss Ivulans (75)

     1-4   Marko Simic (88) pen.

2-4   Kristaps Grabovskis (90) pen.
Liepaja + - - 0-2 stats
6 May Metta 0 - 2

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Abdoulaye Gueye (85)

     0-2   Abdoulaye Gueye (88)
Super Nova - - + 0-0 stats
11 May Tukums 2 - 0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Ingars Pulis (52)

2-0   C. Kouoh (84)
Metta - - + 0-0 stats
15 May Metta 1 - 1

     0-1   Maksims Sidorovs (19)

---------------------------------------
1-1   Emils Evelons (68)
Grobina - - - 0-1 stats
20 May RFS 2 - 0

1-0   Dmitrijs Zelenkovs (3)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Stefan Panic (48)
Metta - - + 1-0 stats
24 May Metta 0 - 3

     0-1   Meïssa Diop (12)

     0-2   Baba Musah (34)

---------------------------------------
     0-3   A. Cernomordijs (61)
Riga FC + - + 0-2 stats
29 May Auda 4 - 1

     0-1   Deniss Melniks (o.g.) (4)

1-1   Kemelho Nguena (19) pen.

---------------------------------------
2-1   Steevenson Jeudy (50)

3-1   Renars Varslavans (60)

4-1   Ousmane Camara (87) pen.
Metta + - - 1-1 stats
13 Jun FS Jelgava 2 - 1

     0-1   Kristofers Rekis (11)

1-1   Eriks Boroduška (29)

---------------------------------------
2-1   Karlis Vilnis (o.g.) (90)
Metta + - - 1-1 stats



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
17 Jun Metta h2h Daugavpils 1.00 0.67
21 Jun Liepaja h2h Metta 1.78 0.44
27 Jun Super Nova h2h Metta 1.25 0.44
2 Jul Metta h2h Tukums 1.00 0.22
6 Jul Grobina h2h Metta 1.56 0.44
19 Jul Metta h2h RFS 1.00 2.00
27 Jul Riga FC h2h Metta 2.13 0.44
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.37

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins ---
Consecutive draws ---
Consecutive defeats 154
No win 6612
No draw 154
No defeat ---
1 goal scored or more -22
1 goal conceded or more 499
No goal scored 1--
No goal conceded ---
GF+GA over 2.5 123
GF+GA under 2.5 ---
Scored at least twice ---










Comparison with league average


Metta (17 matches) compared to league average

(overall)Metta League AVG
Points per game  0.71 1.38
% Wins  18% 38%
% Draws  18% 25%
% Defeats  65% 38%
Goals scored per game  0.82 1.44
Goals conceded per game  2.12 1.44
% Clean sheets  12% 27%
% Failed To Score  53% 27%
% Won To Nil  6% 21%
% Lost To Nil  47% 21%
% Team scored first  18% 47%
% Opponent scored first  76% 47%
Average minute scored first  23 30
Average minute conceded first  28 30
Lead-defending rate  60% 64%
Equalizing rate  35% 36%
% Time leading  9% 28%
% Time level in goals  46% 45%
% Time trailing  46% 28%
PPG when scored first  1.00 2.19
PPG when conceded first  0.62 0.61
Total goals per game  2.94 2.87
% over 1.5 goals  82% 80%
% over 2.5 goals  47% 49%
% over 3.5 goals  35% 31%
% both teams scored  41% 52%

Metta at home (8 matches) compared to league average at home

(home matches)Metta League AVG
Points per game  1.00 1.80
% Wins  25% 52%
% Draws  25% 25%
% Defeats  50% 24%
Goals scored per game  0.88 1.74
Goals conceded per game  1.63 1.13
% Clean sheets  25% 39%
% Failed To Score  50% 15%
% Won To Nil  12% 33%
% Lost To Nil  38% 9%
% Team scored first  12% 55%
% Opponent scored first  75% 39%
Average minute scored first  54 32
Average minute conceded first  27 28
Lead-defending rate  100% 71%
Equalizing rate  43% 47%
% Time leading  9% 36%
% Time level in goals  50% 45%
% Time trailing  41% 19%
PPG when scored first  3.00 2.45
PPG when conceded first  0.67 1.00
Total goals per game  2.50 2.87
% over 1.5 goals  62% 80%
% over 2.5 goals  38% 49%
% over 3.5 goals  25% 31%
% both teams scored  38% 52%

Metta away (9 matches) compared to league average away

(away matches)Metta League AVG
Points per game  0.44 0.95
% Wins  11% 24%
% Draws  11% 25%
% Defeats  78% 52%
Goals scored per game  0.78 1.13
Goals conceded per game  2.56 1.74
% Clean sheets  0% 15%
% Failed To Score  56% 39%
% Won To Nil  0% 9%
% Lost To Nil  56% 33%
% Team scored first  22% 39%
% Opponent scored first  78% 55%
Average minute scored first  8 28
Average minute conceded first  29 32
Lead-defending rate  33% 53%
Equalizing rate  30% 29%
% Time leading  8% 19%
% Time level in goals  42% 45%
% Time trailing  50% 36%
PPG when scored first  0.00 1.82
PPG when conceded first  0.57 0.34
Total goals per game  3.33 2.87
% over 1.5 goals  100% 80%
% over 2.5 goals  56% 49%
% over 3.5 goals  44% 31%
% both teams scored  44% 52%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Metta
 Leading & trailing stats (total) (this season in the league) 

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 3 / 17 18%
  Opponent scored first 13 / 17 76%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at half-time 0 / 17 0%
  Opponent was leading at half-time 9 / 17 53%

  LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 7.7 min. 9%
  Average minutes level in goals 41.1 min. 46%
  Average minutes trailing 41.2 min. 46%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Metta have been in the lead for an average duration of 7.7 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 41.2 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Metta
 Equalizer goals (total) (this season in the league) 

  Matches played 17

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 5
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 60%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  Goals giving the lead to the opponent 17
  Equalizer goals scored 6
  Equalizing rate * (2) 35%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 3
  Non-crucial goals conceded 17

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Metta have taken the lead 5 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 60% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 40%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 17 times that Metta's opponents have taken the lead, Metta have managed to score an equalizer on 6 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 35%.


 flag Metta
 Leading & trailing stats (home) (this season in the league, home matches) 

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 1 / 8 12%
  Opponent scored first 6 / 8 75%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at half-time 0 / 8 0%
  Opponent was leading at half-time 5 / 8 62%

  LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 8.3 min. 9%
  Average minutes level in goals 45.1 min. 50%
  Average minutes trailing 36.6 min. 41%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Metta have been in the lead for an average duration of 8.3 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 36.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Metta
 Equalizer goals (home) (this season in the league, home matches) 

  Matches played 8

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 2
  Equalizer goals conceded 0
  Lead defending rate * (1) 100%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  Goals giving the lead to the opponent 7
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 43%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 2
  Non-crucial goals conceded 6

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Metta have taken the lead 2 times and have conceded an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 100% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 0%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 7 times that Metta's opponents have taken the lead when Metta were playing at home, Metta have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 43%.



 flag Metta
 Leading & trailing stats (away) (this season in the league, away matches) 

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 2 / 9 22%
  Opponent scored first 7 / 9 78%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at half-time 0 / 9 0%
  Opponent was leading at half-time 4 / 9 44%

  LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 7.2 min. 8%
  Average minutes level in goals 37.6 min. 42%
  Average minutes trailing 45.2 min. 50%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Metta have been in the lead for an average duration of 7.2 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 45.2 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Metta
 Equalizer goals (away) (this season in the league, away matches) 

  Matches played 9

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 3
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 33%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  Goals giving the lead to the opponent 10
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 30%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 1
  Non-crucial goals conceded 11

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Metta have taken the lead 3 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 33% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 67%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 10 times that Metta's opponents have taken the lead when Metta were playing away, Metta have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 30%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Riga FC 17 42 0 - 3 1 - 1 h2h
   
2 RFS 17 40 1 - 0 2 - 0 h2h
   
3 Auda 17 28 0 - 1 4 - 1 h2h
   
4 FS Jelgava 17 23 0 - 0 2 - 1 h2h
   
5 Liepaja 17 23 2 - 4 4 - 0 h2h
   
6 Daugavpils 17 22   2 - 0 h2h
   
7 Super Nova 17 17 0 - 2 4 - 0 h2h
   
8 Grobina 17 16 1 - 1 2 - 4 h2h
   
9 Metta 17 12
10 Tukums 17 11 3 - 2 2 - 0 h2h
   








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 7 714
GF per match 0.880.78 0.82
Goals conceded (GA) 132336
GA per match 1.632.56 2.12
GF + GA per match 2.503.332.94
GF+GA over 0.5 88%100%94%
GF+GA over 1.5 62%100%82%
GF+GA over 2.5 38%56%47%
GF+GA over 3.5 25%44%35%
GF+GA over 4.5 25%22%24%
GF+GA over 5.5 12%11%12%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 62%78%71%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 38%56%47%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 12%22%18%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 25%0%12%
Won-to-nil 12%0%6%
Failed to score 50%56%53%
Lost-to-nil 38%56%47%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 50%44%47%
Scoring Rate 1st-Half 12%33%24%
Scoring Rate 2nd-Half 50%22%35%
Scored in both halves 12%11%12%
Both teams scored 38%44%41%
Conceding Rate 75%100%88%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 62%78%71%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 38%78%59%
Conceded in both halves 25%56%41%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 50%44%47%
GF over 1.5 25%11%18%
GF over 2.5 12%11%12%
GF over 3.5 0%11%6%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 75%100%88%
GA over 1.5 50%89%71%
GA over 2.5 25%33%29%
GA over 3.5 12%33%24%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Metta matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 12%0%6%
Match total goals = 1 25%0%12%
Match total goals = 2 25%44%35%
Match total goals = 3 12%11%12%
Match total goals = 4 0%22%12%
Match total goals = 5+ 25%22%24%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 38%0%18%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 38%56%47%
Match total goals = 4+ 25%44%35%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  20 00
Away wins  01 00
Home & Away wins  21 00
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  12 10
Away defeats  13 12
Home & Away defeats  25 22


A majority of Metta's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (2 wins), while 1 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more.

A majority of Metta's defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (9 defeats), while 2 of their defeats had a one-goal margin.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 67%
33%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.00
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)0.44
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored (GF) 50%
50%
  % Goals conceded (GA) 36%
64%
  League average (% goals) 61%
39%








Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 00 0  0%
Drawing at HT 35 8  47%
Losing at HT 54 9  53%
  Total 8917







Goal times


 flag Metta
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 2
GA 6
16-30 GF 2
GA 7
31-45 GF 1
GA 6
46-60 GF 4
GA 6
61-75 GF 3
GA 4
76-90 GF 2
GA 7
1st Half GF 5
36%
GA 19
53%
2nd Half GF 9
64%
GA 17
47%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 51
 Avg. minute goals conceded 46


  Metta
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 0
GA 3
16-30 GF 1
GA 2
31-45 GF 0
GA 3
46-60 GF 3
GA 1
61-75 GF 2
GA 1
76-90 GF 1
GA 3
1st Half GF 1
14%
GA 8
62%
2nd Half GF 6
86%
GA 5
38%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 59
  Avg. minute goals conceded 44


  Metta
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 2
GA 3
16-30 GF 1
GA 5
31-45 GF 1
GA 3
46-60 GF 1
GA 5
61-75 GF 1
GA 3
76-90 GF 1
GA 4
1st Half GF 4
57%
GA 11
48%
2nd Half GF 3
43%
GA 12
52%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 43
  Avg. minute goals conceded 47








Metta scores

FT at home
2-4 1 12%
0-3 1 12%
3-2 1 12%
0-2 1 12%
1-1 1 12%
0-1 1 12%
1-0 1 12%
0-0 1 12%
FT away
2-0 3 33%
4-0 2 22%
2-4 1 11%
4-1 1 11%
2-1 1 11%
1-1 1 11%
The Metta score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 2-0 so far (3 times).
Half-time at home
0-0 3 38%
0-2 2 25%
0-1 2 25%
1-2 1 12%
Half-time away
1-1 2 22%
1-0 2 22%
0-0 2 22%
2-2 1 11%
3-0 1 11%
2-0 1 11%




This season in the league
Metta have lost their last 4 matches. Metta have failed to win in their last 12 matches. Metta failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 9 matches. Metta conceded at least one goal in 6 of their 8 home matches. Metta have failed to score in 4 of their 8 home matches. Metta conceded at least one goal in each of their 9 away matches. 67% of Metta's points have been earned at home. Metta have conceded the opening goal in 13 of their 17 matches. Metta have lost 11 of their 17 matches. Metta have lost 7 of their 9 away matches. Metta have lost their last 5 away matches. Metta have failed to win in their last 6 home matches. Metta have conceded 2 goals or more in each of their last 4 matches. Metta have conceded 2 goals or more in each of their last 5 away matches.








Tables overview

League table

GP pts
Riga FC 17 42
RFS 17 40
Auda 17 28
FS Jelgava 17 23
Liepaja 17 23
Daugavpils 17 22
Super Nova 17 17
Grobina 17 16
Metta 17 12
Tukums 17 11

Form table (last 8)

GP pts
Riga FC 8 24
RFS 8 19
Liepaja 8 12
FS Jelgava 8 11
Grobina 8 11
Super Nova 8 10
Auda 8 9
Tukums 8 6
Daugavpils 8 6
Metta 8 1

Home

GP pts
RFS 9 24
FS Jelgava 9 20
Auda 9 19
Riga FC 8 17
Daugavpils 8 16
Liepaja 9 16
Grobina 9 14
Super Nova 8 10
Tukums 8 9
Metta 8 8

Away

GP pts
Riga FC 9 25
RFS 8 16
Auda 8 9
Super Nova 9 7
Liepaja 8 7
Daugavpils 9 6
Metta 9 4
FS Jelgava 8 3
Tukums 9 2
Grobina 8 2

Offence

GP GF
RFS 17 41
Riga FC 17 40
Auda 17 27
Liepaja 17 26
Daugavpils 17 23
Super Nova 17 23
FS Jelgava 17 18
Grobina 17 16
Tukums 17 16
Metta 17 14

Defence

GP GA
Riga FC 17 10
RFS 17 15
FS Jelgava 17 17
Auda 17 18
Super Nova 17 24
Daugavpils 17 27
Liepaja 17 29
Tukums 17 34
Grobina 17 34
Metta 17 36






Total Match Goals stats


Total match goals stats

Matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
RFS  17 3.29 100% 76% 65% 35% 29% 18% 59% 29% 12% 29% 12%
Liepaja  17 3.24 88% 76% 59% 47% 29% 18% 53% 29% 29% 18% 18%
Daugavpils  17 2.94 94% 76% 53% 29% 29% 12% 65% 24% 18% 18% 12%
Grobina  17 2.94 100% 88% 35% 29% 29% 12% 47% 18% 35% 18% 35%
Metta  17 2.94 94% 82% 47% 35% 24% 12% 41% 12% 53% 6% 47%
Riga FC  17 2.94 100% 88% 53% 24% 12% 12% 41% 59% 0% 59% 0%
Tukums  17 2.94 88% 88% 53% 29% 18% 12% 41% 24% 47% 12% 35%
Super Nova  17 2.76 94% 88% 47% 29% 12% 6% 71% 18% 18% 12% 12%
Auda  17 2.65 94% 76% 47% 29% 12% 6% 53% 41% 12% 35% 6%
FS Jelgava  17 2.06 88% 59% 35% 18% 6% 0% 47% 18% 47% 6% 35%
League average 94.1% 80.0% 49.4% 30.6% 20.0% 10.6% 51.8% 27.1% 27.1% 21.2% 21.2%

Total match goals stats (last 8 matches)

Last 8 matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
RFS  8 4.00 100% 88% 75% 50% 38% 38% 62% 38% 0% 38% 0%
Tukums  8 3.25 88% 88% 50% 38% 25% 25% 50% 25% 38% 12% 25%
Metta  8 3.13 100% 100% 50% 25% 25% 12% 50% 0% 50% 0% 50%
Auda  8 3.00 88% 75% 50% 50% 25% 12% 75% 12% 25% 0% 12%
Riga FC  8 2.88 100% 88% 50% 25% 12% 12% 25% 75% 0% 75% 0%
Super Nova  8 2.75 88% 88% 38% 25% 25% 12% 75% 25% 12% 12% 0%
Liepaja  8 2.50 88% 75% 38% 25% 12% 12% 50% 25% 38% 12% 25%
Daugavpils  8 2.25 88% 50% 25% 25% 25% 12% 50% 25% 38% 12% 25%
Grobina  8 2.25 100% 75% 12% 12% 12% 12% 25% 38% 38% 38% 38%
FS Jelgava  8 2.00 88% 50% 38% 25% 0% 0% 38% 25% 50% 12% 38%
League average 92.5% 77.5% 42.5% 30.0% 20.0% 15.0% 50.0% 28.8% 28.8% 21.3% 21.3%

Total match goals stats (at home)

Home matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Tukums  8 3.50 88% 88% 62% 50% 25% 25% 50% 38% 25% 25% 12%
Grobina  9 3.00 100% 89% 33% 33% 33% 11% 56% 33% 11% 33% 11%
RFS  9 3.00 100% 67% 44% 33% 33% 22% 33% 56% 11% 56% 11%
Super Nova  8 3.00 88% 88% 50% 38% 25% 12% 75% 25% 12% 12% 0%
FS Jelgava  9 2.89 100% 78% 67% 33% 11% 0% 78% 11% 11% 11% 11%
Liepaja  9 2.89 78% 67% 56% 44% 22% 11% 56% 44% 22% 22% 0%
Auda  9 2.67 100% 89% 44% 22% 11% 0% 44% 56% 0% 56% 0%
Daugavpils  8 2.63 100% 75% 50% 12% 12% 12% 50% 38% 12% 38% 12%
Riga FC  8 2.63 100% 100% 50% 12% 0% 0% 38% 62% 0% 62% 0%
Metta  8 2.50 88% 62% 38% 25% 25% 12% 38% 25% 50% 12% 38%
League average 94.1% 80.0% 49.4% 30.6% 20.0% 10.6% 51.8% 38.8% 15.3% 32.9% 9.4%

Total match goals stats (away)

Away matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Liepaja  8 3.63 100% 88% 62% 50% 38% 25% 50% 12% 38% 12% 38%
RFS  8 3.63 100% 88% 88% 38% 25% 12% 88% 0% 12% 0% 12%
Metta  9 3.33 100% 100% 56% 44% 22% 11% 44% 0% 56% 0% 56%
Daugavpils  9 3.22 89% 78% 56% 44% 44% 11% 78% 11% 22% 0% 11%
Riga FC  9 3.22 100% 78% 56% 33% 22% 22% 44% 56% 0% 56% 0%
Grobina  8 2.88 100% 88% 38% 25% 25% 12% 38% 0% 62% 0% 62%
Auda  8 2.63 88% 62% 50% 38% 12% 12% 62% 25% 25% 12% 12%
Super Nova  9 2.56 100% 89% 44% 22% 0% 0% 67% 11% 22% 11% 22%
Tukums  9 2.44 89% 89% 44% 11% 11% 0% 33% 11% 67% 0% 56%
FS Jelgava  8 1.13 75% 38% 0% 0% 0% 0% 12% 25% 88% 0% 62%
League average 94.1% 80.0% 49.4% 30.6% 20.0% 10.6% 51.8% 15.3% 38.8% 9.4% 32.9%




Segments Table

0 pt Segments table progression arrow 42 pts
5th Segment 4th Segment 3rd Segment 2nd Segment 1st Segment
up to 8.0 pts from 8.1 to 16.5 pts from 16.6 to 25.0 pts from 25.1 to 33.5 pts from 33.6 to 42 pts
(17)  16  Grobina
(17)  12  Metta
(17)  11  Tukums
(17)  23  FS Jelgava
(17)  23  Liepaja
(17)  22  Daugavpils
(17)  17  Super Nova
(17)  28  Auda (17)  42  Riga FC
(17)  40  RFS

The Segments Table is a visual representation splitting the teams into 5 segments. Each team is assigned to a specific segment, depending on the team's number of points. Each of the 5 segments spans one-fifth (20%) of the total points held by the team ranked 1st in the league. For each team, the number of matches played appears in green between brackets, and the number of points is displayed in black.








Tue 17 Jun
MET - DAU
Tue 17 Jun
TUK - JEL
Tue 17 Jun
SUP - LIE
Wed 18 Jun
GRO - AUD
Wed 18 Jun
RFC - RFS
Sat 21 Jun
DAU - TUK
Sat 21 Jun
LIE - MET
Sun 22 Jun
JEL - GRO
Sun 22 Jun
RFC - SUP
Sun 22 Jun
RFS - AUD




Latvia - Virsliga stats

85 matches played / 120
70.8% completed
Home wins:  52%
Over 1.5 goals:  80%
Draws:  25%
Over 2.5 goals:  49%
Away wins:  24%
Over 3.5 goals:  31%
Goals:  244 Home goals per match:  1.74
Goals per match:  2.87 Away goals per match:  1.13
    Both teams scored:  52%

Results

 Latest results
 Matches by date
 Matches by Matchweek
 Results grid
 Results filter
 Outcome Surprise-Levels

Tables

 Home / Away tables
 Wide table
 Form tables
 Stats by month
 Projected points

Analysis

 Goals statistics
 Points performance
 Over / Under
 Scored / Conceded
 Home advantage
 Relative form
 Run-in analysis

Goal times

 When goals were scored
 1st-half / 2nd-half
 First team to score
 Goal types
 Lead durations
 Points Won/Lost
Home team scored first: 55% No goal scored: 6% Away team scored first: 39%
Average minute when home team scored first: 32 min. Average minute when away team scored first: 28 min.
Home team lead-defending rate: 71% Away team lead-defending rate: 53%
Home team equalizing rate: 47% Away team equalizing rate: 29%
Home team lead duration: 36% Teams level in goals: 45% Away team lead duration: 19%
Home PPG when home team scored first: 2.45 Away PPG when away team scored first: 1.82

More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 85 matches played in the Latvian league, a total of 244 goals have been scored (2.87 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including Latvia - Virsliga results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded.

 

SoccerSTATS.com - Public edition

SoccerSTATS.com provides football statistics, results and blog articles on national and international soccer competitions worldwide. Football fans can keep a tab on stats related to their favourite team or leagues of interest, and access a wide range of team performance data analytics and league standings, not only on the world's most famous professional leagues, but also on amateur and regional leagues over the world. Example of soccer statistics include league standings, form tables, top goal scorers, scoring stats, statistical previews and goal timing statistics.
Follow us on Twitter
F.A.Q. Contact Privacy Policy Change consent
Terms & conditions of use About us Cookie usage and options
Mobile app

Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. Products, services, promotional offers and other offerings from partners and advertisers are subject to terms and conditions. By using this website you certify that you agree with the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy and that you are over the age of 18 or that you have the permission of a parent or guardian to use this website, after your parent or guardian has carefully reviewed and agreed to the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy. The website's content is provided for informational purposes only is not to be relied upon as a professional opinion whatsover. Nothing on this website should be considered as advice. This website is not associated with nor endorsed by any league or competition (whether professional, collegiate or other types of leagues / competitions), federation, association, club or team. All trademarks, brands, images, logos and names appearing on this website belong to their respective owners.
Useful links (third-party websites):   www.gamcare.org.uk       www.begambleaware.org        gamblingtherapy.org
   
Copyright 1998-2025 SoccerSTATS.com
back to top