back to top
LEAGUES MATCHES STATS FAV BLOG

 Favourite leagues
 -------------------------------
 My Favourites
 ------------------------------- Select favourites
 Featured leagues
 ------------------------------- ENG - Premier League ITA - Serie A SPA - La Liga FRA - Ligue 1 GER - Bundesliga
 All leagues
 ------------------------------- See 'Search league' box Display all leagues
 International (clubs)
 ------------------------------- Champions League Europa League Conference League Copa Libertadores Copa Sudamericana FIFA Club World Cup Champions League (W)
 International (nations)
 ------------------------------- EURO 2024 Euro Qualification UEFA Nations League World Cup 2026 WC Qualification Europe WC Qual. South-America WC Qualification Asia Copa America Africa Cup of Nations Asian Cup Women's World Cup Women's EURO 2025
MEMBER LOGIN
usa2
USA - USL Championship
2026 2025
Favourite Stats  Tables Home / Away tables Form tables Tables by Date Half-time stats Wide table Points performance Performance rating Run-in analysis Relative form Projected points Home advantage Points Won/Lost  Matches Matches by date Results grid Results filter Current streaks  Goals per match Over / Under Total Goals Goal ranges Average goals Scored / conceded Both teams scored Goal margins  Goal timing Goals per 10 min. Goals per 15 min. First Goal stats Scored in both halves  Leading / losing Lead durations Scored / conceded first Leading / Trailing at HT Goal types Equalisers scored Equalisers conceded
MLSUSL ChampionshipUSL League OneNWSLUSL Super League
Birmingham L. Brooklyn FC Charleston Colorado S. Detroit City El Paso FC Tulsa Hartford A. Indy Eleven Las Vegas L. Lexington Loudoun Utd Louisville City Miami FC Monterey Bay New Mexico Oakland Roots Orange County Phoenix Rising Pittsburgh Rhode Island Sacramento R. San Antonio Sporting JAX Tampa Bay
LATEST MATCHES FORM H2H GOALS HALF-TIME TIMING FIRST GOAL FAVOURITE
🔍

Birmingham L. vs New Mexico

advertisement


Visual table

  GP Pts
1  Tampa Bay 24 48
2  El Paso 24 43
3  New Mexico 23 42
4  Charleston 24 40
5  Pittsburgh 25 38
6  Detroit City 23 37
7  Colorado S. 24 37
8  Hartford A. 24 37
9  Sacramento R. 23 36
10  FC Tulsa 23 36
11  San Antonio 24 36
12  Orange County 24 36
13  Lexington 24 34
14  Indy Eleven 23 33
15  Phoenix Rising 24 33
16  Louisville City 24 33
17  Rhode Island 22 32
18  Las Vegas L. 24 32
19  Oakland Roots 24 27
20  Miami FC 24 24
21  Birmingham L. 23 20
22  Loudoun Utd 23 20
23  Monterey Bay 24 18
24  Brooklyn FC 23 17
25  Sporting JAX 25 14

 
Thu 17 Sep 2026
Birmingham L.4 4New Mexico
Romario Williams (11) 1:0
1:1 Zico Bailey (16)
1:2 Niall Reid-Stephen (19)
1:3 Greg Hurst (64)
1:4 Joseph Melto Quiah (66)
Ronaldo Damus (77) 2:4
G. Diarbian (87) 3:4
Ronaldo Damus (90) 4:4






Seasonal streaks


3rd consecutive draw for Birmingham L..
2nd consecutive home draw for Birmingham L..
2nd consecutive draw for New Mexico.
14th consecutive game where Birmingham L. scored.
8th consecutive home game where Birmingham L. scored.
5th consecutive game where New Mexico conceded.
2nd consecutive away game where New Mexico conceded.
5th consecutive game where New Mexico scored.
2nd consecutive away game where New Mexico scored.
6th consecutive game where Birmingham L. conceded.
3rd consecutive home game where Birmingham L. conceded.
 

 
Lead durations in 90 minutes of regular time
090
Birmingham L. (5)Level (14)New Mexico (71)
Lead durations tables
  How are the duration values calculated?⌄

To calculate the above duration values based on a total of 90 minutes, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are considered scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are considered scored on the 90th minute.


Outcome Surprise-Level

Points Per Game (before the match)
Birmingham L. at home1.00
New Mexico away1.70
OutcomeOutcome surprise-level
Draw
11.7%
Scale: from 0 (less surprising) to 100 (more surprising)

Outcome Surprise-levels

More information on the calculation of the Outcome surprise-level is outlined in the following blog article:
Evaluating surprising results







 






 flag

Birmingham L.

 (this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 13 2 7 4  
  Away 10 1 4 5  
  Total 23 3 11 9  
PPG (Home): 1.00
PPG (Away): 0.70
PPG (Total): 0.87


Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game0.87 0.75 -13.8%
AVG Goals For1.39 2.00 +43.9%
AVG Goals Against1.65 2.38 +44.2%



Birmingham L.'s progression (home & away)
Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
8 Mar Birmingham L. 0:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Marco Micaletto (57)
Tampa Bay - - + 0-0
11 Mar Birmingham L. 0:0

Hartford A. - + + 0-0
21 Mar Charleston 3:2

     0-1   Romario Williams (25)
     0-2   S. Shashoua (27)
---------------------------------------
1-2   Colton Swan (58)
2-2   Emilio Ycaza (80) pen.
3-2   Emilio Ycaza (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 0-2
4 Apr Loudoun Utd 2:2

     0-1   Tyler Pasher (16)
1-1   James Murphy (31)
---------------------------------------
     1-2   Tyler Pasher (54)
2-2   A. Ordez (79) pen.
Birmingham L. + - - 1-1
12 Apr Birmingham L. 1:0

1-0   Sebastian Tregarthen (25)
Pittsburgh - + - 1-0
19 Apr Birmingham L. 2:2

1-0   Tyler Pasher (39) pen.
---------------------------------------
     1-1   Edward Kizza (68)
     1-2   Josh OBrien (81)
2-2   Sam McIllhatton (89)
Indy Eleven + - - 1-0
2 May Rhode Island 1:3

     0-1   Sebastian Tregarthen (3)
1-1   Leo Afonso (17)
---------------------------------------
     1-2   Phanuel Kavita (48)
     1-3   Ronaldo Damus (57)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-1
8 May Birmingham L. 0:0

Miami FC - + + 0-0
24 May Monterey Bay 2:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Riley Bidois (60)
2-0   E. Blancas (78)
Birmingham L. - - + 0-0
4 Jun Birmingham L. 1:1

1-0   G. Diarbian (10)
     1-1   Babacar Niang (42)
Louisville City - - - 1-1
14 Jun Birmingham L. 1:2

     0-1   Oalex Anderson (15)
---------------------------------------
     0-2   Johnny Rodriguez (60)
1-2   Sebastin Saucedo (89)
Las Vegas L. + - - 0-1
17 Jun Oakland Roots 1:1

     0-1   Peter-Lee Vassell (45)
---------------------------------------
1-1   P. Wilson (90)
Birmingham L. - - - 0-1
21 Jun Birmingham L. 1:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Abdellatif Aboukoura (67)
1-1   Sebastian Tregarthen (89)
Loudoun Utd - - - 0-0
3 Jul Birmingham L. 1:2

     0-1   Rio Hope-Gund (2)
1-1   Tyler Pasher (24) pen.
---------------------------------------
     1-2   Ben Morris (90)
Detroit City + - - 1-1
5 Jul Miami FC 1:1

1-0   Arney Rocha (41)
---------------------------------------
     1-1   Peter-Lee Vassell (78)
Birmingham L. - - - 1-0
29 Jul Louisville City 2:1

1-0   Kevon Lambert (6)
     1-1   S. Shashoua (42)
---------------------------------------
2-1   Kevon Lambert (74)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-1
2 Aug Birmingham L. 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Ronaldo Damus (63)
Rhode Island - + - 0-0
16 Aug Colorado S. 3:2

     0-1   Nico Brown (24)
1-1   Garven Metusala (45)
---------------------------------------
     1-2   Serge Ngoma Jr. (86)
2-2   Adrien Perez (90)
3-2   Juan Tejada (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-1
23 Aug Birmingham L. 2:3

---------------------------------------
1-0   Ronaldo Damus (55)
     1-1   Emil Jaaskelainen (58)
     1-2   Wan Kuzain (76)
2-2   Romario Williams (90)
     2-3   Danny Wilson (90)
Sporting JAX + - - 0-0
29 Aug Hartford A. 3:2

     0-1   Romario Williams (21)
     0-2   Romario Williams (39)
1-2   Barry Coffey (42)
2-2   Michee Ngalina (45)
---------------------------------------
3-2   Jordan Scarlett (74)
Birmingham L. + - - 2-2
5 Sep Indy Eleven 2:2

1-0   Joe Hafferty (20)
     1-1   Tyler Pasher (40)
---------------------------------------
     1-2   Romario Williams (66)
2-2   Dylan Sing (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-1
12 Sep Birmingham L. 2:2

1-0   Sebastian Tregarthen (11)
     1-1   Miguel Berry (14)
     1-2   Miguel Berry (21)
2-2   Romario Williams (39)
Charleston + - - 2-2
17 Sep Birmingham L. 4:4

1-0   Romario Williams (11)
     1-1   Zico Bailey (16)
     1-2   Niall Reid-Stephen (19)
---------------------------------------
     1-3   Greg Hurst (64)
     1-4   Joseph Melto Quiah (66)
2-4   Ronaldo Damus (77)
3-4   G. Diarbian (87)
4-4   Ronaldo Damus (90)
New Mexico + - - 1-2



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
19 Sep Tampa Bay vs Birmingham L. 2.09 0.70
23 Sep Birmingham L. vs Brooklyn FC 1.00 0.50
3 Oct Detroit City vs Birmingham L. 2.18 0.70
10 Oct Sporting JAX vs Birmingham L. 0.75 0.70
18 Oct Birmingham L. vs Loudoun Utd 1.00 0.90
21 Oct Brooklyn FC (pp.) Birmingham L. 1.00 0.70
24 Oct Pittsburgh vs Birmingham L. 1.77 0.70
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.31

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins ---
Consecutive draws 213
Consecutive defeats ---
No win 376
No draw ---
No defeat 213
1 goal scored or more 8614
1 goal conceded or more 3106
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded ---
GF+GA over 2.5 346
GF+GA under 2.5 ---
Scored at least twice 336










Comparison with league average


Birmingham L. (23 matches) vs league average

(overall)Birmingham L. League AVG
Points per game  0.87 1.36
% Wins  13% 36%
% Draws  48% 29%
% Defeats  39% 36%
Goals scored per game  1.39 1.37
Goals conceded per game  1.65 1.37
% Clean sheets  17% 27%
% Failed To Score  17% 27%
% Won To Nil  9% 18%
% Lost To Nil  9% 18%
% Team scored first  57% 46%
% Opponent scored first  35% 46%
Average minute scored first  27 32
Average minute conceded first  34 32
Lead-defending rate  18% 56%
Equalizing rate  50% 44%
% Time leading  21% 24%
% Time level in goals  59% 51%
% Time trailing  20% 24%
PPG when scored first  1.15 2.22
PPG when conceded first  0.38 0.56
Total goals per game  3.04 2.74
% over 1.5 goals  78% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  57% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  43% 31%
% both teams scored  74% 55%

Birmingham L. at home (13 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Birmingham L. League AVG
Points per game  1.00 1.60
% Wins  15% 44%
% Draws  54% 29%
% Defeats  31% 27%
Goals scored per game  1.23 1.52
Goals conceded per game  1.38 1.22
% Clean sheets  31% 31%
% Failed To Score  23% 23%
% Won To Nil  15% 22%
% Lost To Nil  8% 15%
% Team scored first  54% 54%
% Opponent scored first  31% 37%
Average minute scored first  31 32
Average minute conceded first  35 33
Lead-defending rate  29% 59%
Equalizing rate  60% 48%
% Time leading  14% 29%
% Time level in goals  64% 51%
% Time trailing  22% 20%
PPG when scored first  1.43 2.31
PPG when conceded first  0.25 0.71
Total goals per game  2.62 2.74
% over 1.5 goals  62% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  46% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  31% 31%
% both teams scored  62% 55%

Birmingham L. away (10 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Birmingham L. League AVG
Points per game  0.70 1.11
% Wins  10% 27%
% Draws  40% 29%
% Defeats  50% 44%
Goals scored per game  1.60 1.22
Goals conceded per game  2.00 1.52
% Clean sheets  0% 23%
% Failed To Score  10% 31%
% Won To Nil  0% 15%
% Lost To Nil  10% 22%
% Team scored first  60% 37%
% Opponent scored first  40% 54%
Average minute scored first  22 33
Average minute conceded first  32 32
Lead-defending rate  10% 52%
Equalizing rate  38% 41%
% Time leading  30% 20%
% Time level in goals  53% 51%
% Time trailing  17% 29%
PPG when scored first  0.83 2.08
PPG when conceded first  0.50 0.47
Total goals per game  3.60 2.74
% over 1.5 goals  100% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  70% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  60% 31%
% both teams scored  90% 55%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Birmingham L.
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 13 / 23 57%
  Opponent scored first 8 / 23 35%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 4 / 23 17%
  Opponent was leading at HT 3 / 23 13%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 18.8 min. 21%
  Average minutes level in goals 53.0 min. 59%
  Average minutes trailing 18.2 min. 20%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Birmingham L. have been in the lead for an average duration of 18.8 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 18.2 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 23

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 17
  Equalizer goals conceded 14
  Lead defending rate * (1) 18%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 18
  Equalizer goals scored 9
  Equalizing rate * (2) 50%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 6
  Non-crucial goals conceded 6

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Birmingham L. have taken the lead 17 times and have conceded an equalizer on 14 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 18% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 82%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 18 times that Birmingham L.'s opponents have taken the lead, Birmingham L. have managed to score an equalizer on 9 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 50%.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 7 / 13 54%
  Opponent scored first 4 / 13 31%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 2 / 13 15%
  Opponent was leading at HT 2 / 13 15%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 12.6 min. 14%
  Average minutes level in goals 57.2 min. 64%
  Average minutes trailing 20.2 min. 22%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Birmingham L. have been in the lead for an average duration of 12.6 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 20.2 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 13

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 7
  Equalizer goals conceded 5
  Lead defending rate * (1) 29%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 10
  Equalizer goals scored 6
  Equalizing rate * (2) 60%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 3
  Non-crucial goals conceded 3

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Birmingham L. have taken the lead 7 times and have conceded an equalizer on 5 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 29% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 71%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 10 times that Birmingham L.'s opponents have taken the lead when Birmingham L. were playing at home, Birmingham L. have managed to score an equalizer on 6 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 60%.



 flag Birmingham L.
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 6 / 10 60%
  Opponent scored first 4 / 10 40%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 2 / 10 20%
  Opponent was leading at HT 1 / 10 10%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 26.9 min. 30%
  Average minutes level in goals 47.6 min. 53%
  Average minutes trailing 15.5 min. 17%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Birmingham L. have been in the lead for an average duration of 26.9 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 15.5 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 10

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 10
  Equalizer goals conceded 9
  Lead defending rate * (1) 10%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 8
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 38%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 3
  Non-crucial goals conceded 3

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Birmingham L. have taken the lead 10 times and have conceded an equalizer on 9 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 10% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 90%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 8 times that Birmingham L.'s opponents have taken the lead when Birmingham L. were playing away, Birmingham L. have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 38%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Tampa Bay 24 48 0:1 19 Sep h2h
2 El Paso 24 43     h2h
3 New Mexico 23 42 4:4   h2h
4 Charleston 24 40 2:2 3:2 h2h
5 Pittsburgh 25 38 1:0 24 Oct h2h
6 Detroit City 23 37 1:2 3 Oct h2h
7 Colorado S. 24 37   3:2 h2h
8 Hartford A. 24 37 0:0 3:2 h2h
9 Sacramento R. 23 36     h2h
10 FC Tulsa 23 36     h2h
11 San Antonio 24 36     h2h
12 Orange County 24 36     h2h
13 Lexington 24 34     h2h
14 Indy Eleven 23 33 2:2 2:2 h2h
15 Phoenix Rising 24 33     h2h
16 Louisville City 24 33 1:1 2:1 h2h
17 Rhode Island 22 32 1:0 1:3 h2h
18 Las Vegas L. 24 32 1:2   h2h
19 Oakland Roots 24 27   1:1 h2h
20 Miami FC 24 24 0:0 1:1 h2h
21 Birmingham L. 23 20
22 Loudoun Utd 23 20 18 Oct 2:2 h2h
23 Monterey Bay 24 18   2:0 h2h
24 Brooklyn FC 23 17 23 Sep 21 Oct h2h
25 Sporting JAX 25 14 2:3 10 Oct h2h








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 16 1632
GF per match 1.231.60 1.39
Goals conceded (GA) 182038
GA per match 1.382.00 1.65
GF + GA per match 2.623.603.04
GF+GA over 0.5 85%100%91%
GF+GA over 1.5 62%100%78%
GF+GA over 2.5 46%70%57%
GF+GA over 3.5 31%60%43%
GF+GA over 4.5 15%30%22%
GF+GA over 5.5 8%0%4%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 54%90%70%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 31%70%48%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 15%10%13%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 31%0%17%
Won-to-nil 15%0%9%
Failed to score 23%10%17%
Lost-to-nil 8%10%9%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 77%90%83%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 46%80%61%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 46%50%48%
Scored in both halves 15%40%26%
Both teams scored 62%90%74%
Conceding Rate 69%100%83%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 38%70%52%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 54%80%65%
Conceded in both halves 23%50%35%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 77%90%83%
GF over 1.5 31%60%43%
GF over 2.5 8%10%9%
GF over 3.5 8%0%4%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 69%100%83%
GA over 1.5 46%70%57%
GA over 2.5 15%30%22%
GA over 3.5 8%0%4%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Birmingham L. matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 15%0%9%
Match total goals = 1 23%0%13%
Match total goals = 2 15%30%22%
Match total goals = 3 15%10%13%
Match total goals = 4 15%30%22%
Match total goals = 5+ 15%30%22%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 38%0%22%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 31%40%35%
Match total goals = 4+ 31%60%43%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  20 00
Away wins  01 00
Home & Away wins  21 00
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  40 00
Away defeats  41 00
Home & Away defeats  81 00

A majority of Birmingham L.'s wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (2 wins), while 1 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more.

A majority of Birmingham L.'s defeats had a one-goal margin (8 defeats), while 1 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 65%
35%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.00
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)0.70
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 50%
50%
  % Goals conceded 47%
53%
  League average 55%
45%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 22 4  17%
Drawing at HT 97 16  70%
Losing at HT 21 3  13%
  Total 131023







Goal times


 flag Birmingham L.
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 4
GA 4
16-30 GF 7
GA 5
31-45 GF 6
GA 6
46-60 GF 4
GA 5
61-75 GF 2
GA 6
76-90 GF 9
GA 12
1st Half GF 17
53%
GA 15
39%
2nd Half GF 15
47%
GA 23
61%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 49
 Avg. minute goals conceded 55


  Birmingham L.
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 3
GA 3
16-30 GF 2
GA 3
31-45 GF 2
GA 1
46-60 GF 1
GA 3
61-75 GF 1
GA 4
76-90 GF 7
GA 4
1st Half GF 7
44%
GA 7
39%
2nd Half GF 9
56%
GA 11
61%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 56
  Avg. minute goals conceded 50


  Birmingham L.
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 1
GA 1
16-30 GF 5
GA 2
31-45 GF 4
GA 5
46-60 GF 3
GA 2
61-75 GF 1
GA 2
76-90 GF 2
GA 8
1st Half GF 10
62%
GA 8
40%
2nd Half GF 6
38%
GA 12
60%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 42
  Avg. minute goals conceded 60








Birmingham L. scores

FT at home
2-2 2 15%
1-2 2 15%
1-1 2 15%
1-0 2 15%
0-0 2 15%
4-4 1 8%
2-3 1 8%
0-1 1 8%
FT away
3-2 3 30%
2-2 2 20%
1-1 2 20%
1-3 1 10%
2-1 1 10%
2-0 1 10%
The Birmingham L. score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 3-2 so far (3 times).
Half-time at home
0-0 6 46%
1-1 2 15%
1-0 2 15%
2-2 1 8%
1-2 1 8%
0-1 1 8%
Half-time away
1-1 5 50%
2-2 1 10%
0-2 1 10%
0-1 1 10%
1-0 1 10%
0-0 1 10%





This season in the league

Birmingham L. have drawn their last 3 matches.
Birmingham L. have failed to win in their last 6 matches.
Birmingham L. have been undefeated in their last 3 matches.
Birmingham L. have scored in each of their last 14 matches.
Birmingham L. failed to keep a clean sheet in 9 of their 13 home matches.
Birmingham L. failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their 10 away matches.
Birmingham L. have scored in 9 of their 10 away matches.
Birmingham L. have failed to win in their last 7 away matches.
Birmingham L. have scored in each of their last 6 away matches.
Birmingham L. failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 10 away matches.
Birmingham L. have scored a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 6 matches.
Birmingham L. have conceded a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 6 matches.
Birmingham L. have scored a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 3 home matches.
Birmingham L. have conceded a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 3 home matches.
Birmingham L. have scored a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 3 away matches.
Birmingham L. have conceded a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 4 away matches.

View comments for all teams



 flag

New Mexico

 (this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 12 7 3 2  
  Away 11 5 3 3  
  Total 23 12 6 5  
PPG (Home): 2.00
PPG (Away): 1.64
PPG (Total): 1.83


Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game1.83 1.88 +2.7%
AVG Goals For1.61 2.13 +32.3%
AVG Goals Against1.17 1.50 +28.2%



New Mexico's progression (home & away)
Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
15 Mar Oakland Roots 2:1

1-0   W. Prentice (6)
---------------------------------------
2-0   Arturo Astorga (o.g.) (80)
     2-1   Justin Rennicks (82)
New Mexico + - - 1-0
22 Mar San Antonio 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Daniel Barbir (74)
New Mexico - - + 0-0
28 Mar New Mexico 3:2

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Khori Bennett (57) pen.
1-1   Dayonn Harris (64)
2-1   Valentin Nol (75)
     2-2   Khori Bennett (90) pen.
3-2   Ousman Jabang (90)
Colorado S. + - - 0-0
5 Apr Orange County 0:1

     0-1   Niall Reid-Stephen (32) pen.
New Mexico - + - 0-1
12 Apr Phoenix Rising 3:0

1-0   Ihsan Sacko (13) pen.
---------------------------------------
2-0   John Scearce (75)
3-0   Ihsan Sacko (82)
New Mexico + - + 1-0
7 May New Mexico 2:2

     0-1   R. Rubn (12)
1-1   Greg Hurst (14)
2-1   Greg Hurst (24)
---------------------------------------
     2-2   Diego Abitia Leon (86)
El Paso + - - 2-1
10 May New Mexico 3:1

1-0   Niall Reid-Stephen (32)
     1-1   Oalex Anderson (40)
---------------------------------------
2-1   Ousman Jabang (53)
3-1   Zico Bailey (73)
Las Vegas L. + - - 1-1
21 May New Mexico 0:1

     0-1   Louis Prez (5)
Tampa Bay - - + 0-1
24 May New Mexico 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   K. Keller (81)
Charleston - + - 0-0
30 May Hartford A. 0:0

New Mexico - + + 0-0
14 Jun New Mexico 1:1

1-0   K. Keller (2)
     1-1   Nico Benalcazar (18)
Orange County - - - 1-1
21 Jun Sacramento R. 0:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Dayonn Harris (73)
New Mexico - + - 0-0
5 Jul New Mexico 2:1

1-0   Cristian Nava (6)
2-0   Zico Bailey (41)
---------------------------------------
     2-1   P. Wilson (67) pen.
Oakland Roots + - - 2-0
15 Jul Lexington 1:4

     0-1   Greg Hurst (43) pen.
     0-2   Valentin Nol (45)
---------------------------------------
     0-3   Greg Hurst (62)
     0-4   Joseph Melto Quiah (68)
1-4   Phillip Goodrum (70)
New Mexico + - - 0-2
2 Aug New Mexico 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Maliek Howell (51)
Colorado S. - + - 0-0
9 Aug Monterey Bay 2:5

     0-1   Valentin Nol (6)
1-1   Ryuga Nakamura (31)
---------------------------------------
2-1   Sebastian Lletget (55)
     2-2   Greg Hurst (74)
     2-3   Valentin Nol (77)
     2-4   Dayonn Harris (86)
     2-5   Niall Reid-Stephen (90)
New Mexico + - - 1-1
16 Aug New Mexico 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Greg Hurst (83) pen.
FC Tulsa - + - 0-0
22 Aug Loudoun Utd 0:0

New Mexico - + + 0-0
27 Aug New Mexico 2:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Marqes Muir (51)
1-1   K. Keller (73)
2-1   Niall Reid-Stephen (78)
Lexington + - - 0-0
30 Aug New Mexico 1:2

     0-1   K. Keller (o.g.) (7)
---------------------------------------
1-1   Dayonn Harris (46)
     1-2   Dominick Hernandez (52)
San Antonio + - - 0-1
6 Sep Las Vegas L. 1:2

1-0   Oalex Anderson (29)
     1-1   Greg Hurst (34)
---------------------------------------
     1-2   K. Keller (79)
New Mexico + - - 1-1
12 Sep New Mexico 2:2

1-0   Luther Archimede (16)
2-0   Greg Hurst (18)
---------------------------------------
     2-1   Malik Henry-Scott (50)
     2-2   Jack Blake (59)
Indy Eleven + - - 2-0
17 Sep Birmingham L. 4:4

1-0   Romario Williams (11)
     1-1   Zico Bailey (16)
     1-2   Niall Reid-Stephen (19)
---------------------------------------
     1-3   Greg Hurst (64)
     1-4   Joseph Melto Quiah (66)
2-4   Ronaldo Damus (77)
3-4   G. Diarbian (87)
4-4   Ronaldo Damus (90)
New Mexico + - - 1-2



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
20 Sep Colorado S. vs New Mexico 1.92 1.64
27 Sep New Mexico vs Sacramento R. 2.00 1.08
1 Oct FC Tulsa vs New Mexico 1.75 1.64
4 Oct New Mexico vs Phoenix Rising 2.00 0.92
11 Oct New Mexico vs Monterey Bay 2.00 0.25
18 Oct San Antonio vs New Mexico 1.58 1.64
25 Oct El Paso vs New Mexico 1.82 1.64
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.33

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins ---
Consecutive draws 112
Consecutive defeats ---
No win 212
No draw ---
No defeat 173
1 goal scored or more 825
1 goal conceded or more 325
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded ---
GF+GA over 2.5 325
GF+GA under 2.5 ---
Scored at least twice 123










Comparison with league average


New Mexico (23 matches) vs league average

(overall)New Mexico League AVG
Points per game  1.83 1.36
% Wins  52% 36%
% Draws  26% 29%
% Defeats  22% 36%
Goals scored per game  1.61 1.37
Goals conceded per game  1.17 1.37
% Clean sheets  30% 27%
% Failed To Score  22% 27%
% Won To Nil  22% 18%
% Lost To Nil  13% 18%
% Team scored first  48% 46%
% Opponent scored first  43% 46%
Average minute scored first  39 32
Average minute conceded first  26 32
Lead-defending rate  63% 56%
Equalizing rate  58% 44%
% Time leading  28% 24%
% Time level in goals  53% 51%
% Time trailing  19% 24%
PPG when scored first  2.64 2.22
PPG when conceded first  1.10 0.56
Total goals per game  2.78 2.74
% over 1.5 goals  61% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  57% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  30% 31%
% both teams scored  57% 55%

New Mexico at home (12 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)New Mexico League AVG
Points per game  2.00 1.60
% Wins  58% 44%
% Draws  25% 29%
% Defeats  17% 27%
Goals scored per game  1.58 1.52
Goals conceded per game  1.08 1.22
% Clean sheets  25% 31%
% Failed To Score  8% 23%
% Won To Nil  25% 22%
% Lost To Nil  8% 15%
% Team scored first  58% 54%
% Opponent scored first  42% 37%
Average minute scored first  39 32
Average minute conceded first  26 33
Lead-defending rate  58% 59%
Equalizing rate  67% 48%
% Time leading  31% 29%
% Time level in goals  51% 51%
% Time trailing  18% 20%
PPG when scored first  2.43 2.31
PPG when conceded first  1.40 0.71
Total goals per game  2.67 2.74
% over 1.5 goals  67% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  58% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  33% 31%
% both teams scored  67% 55%

New Mexico away (11 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)New Mexico League AVG
Points per game  1.64 1.11
% Wins  45% 27%
% Draws  27% 29%
% Defeats  27% 44%
Goals scored per game  1.64 1.22
Goals conceded per game  1.27 1.52
% Clean sheets  36% 23%
% Failed To Score  36% 31%
% Won To Nil  18% 15%
% Lost To Nil  18% 22%
% Team scored first  36% 37%
% Opponent scored first  45% 54%
Average minute scored first  38 33
Average minute conceded first  27 32
Lead-defending rate  71% 52%
Equalizing rate  50% 41%
% Time leading  24% 20%
% Time level in goals  55% 51%
% Time trailing  21% 29%
PPG when scored first  3.00 2.08
PPG when conceded first  0.80 0.47
Total goals per game  2.91 2.74
% over 1.5 goals  55% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  55% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  27% 31%
% both teams scored  45% 55%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag New Mexico
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 11 / 23 48%
  Opponent scored first 10 / 23 43%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 6 / 23 26%
  Opponent was leading at HT 4 / 23 17%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 25.0 min. 28%
  Average minutes level in goals 47.7 min. 53%
  Average minutes trailing 17.3 min. 19%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, New Mexico have been in the lead for an average duration of 25.0 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 17.3 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag New Mexico
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 23

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 19
  Equalizer goals conceded 7
  Lead defending rate * (1) 63%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 12
  Equalizer goals scored 7
  Equalizing rate * (2) 58%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 11
  Non-crucial goals conceded 8

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
New Mexico have taken the lead 19 times and have conceded an equalizer on 7 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 63% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 37%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 12 times that New Mexico's opponents have taken the lead, New Mexico have managed to score an equalizer on 7 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 58%.


 flag New Mexico
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 7 / 12 58%
  Opponent scored first 5 / 12 42%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 3 / 12 25%
  Opponent was leading at HT 2 / 12 17%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 27.7 min. 31%
  Average minutes level in goals 46.3 min. 51%
  Average minutes trailing 16.1 min. 18%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, New Mexico have been in the lead for an average duration of 27.7 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 16.1 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag New Mexico
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 12

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 12
  Equalizer goals conceded 5
  Lead defending rate * (1) 58%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 6
  Equalizer goals scored 4
  Equalizing rate * (2) 67%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 3
  Non-crucial goals conceded 2

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, New Mexico have taken the lead 12 times and have conceded an equalizer on 5 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 58% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 42%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 6 times that New Mexico's opponents have taken the lead when New Mexico were playing at home, New Mexico have managed to score an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 67%.



 flag New Mexico
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 4 / 11 36%
  Opponent scored first 5 / 11 45%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 3 / 11 27%
  Opponent was leading at HT 2 / 11 18%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 22.0 min. 24%
  Average minutes level in goals 49.3 min. 55%
  Average minutes trailing 18.7 min. 21%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, New Mexico have been in the lead for an average duration of 22.0 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 18.7 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag New Mexico
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 11

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 7
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 71%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 6
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 50%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 8
  Non-crucial goals conceded 6

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, New Mexico have taken the lead 7 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 71% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 29%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 6 times that New Mexico's opponents have taken the lead when New Mexico were playing away, New Mexico have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 50%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Tampa Bay 24 48 0:1   h2h
2 El Paso 24 43 2:2 25 Oct h2h
3 New Mexico 23 42
4 Charleston 24 40 1:0   h2h
5 Pittsburgh 25 38     h2h
6 Detroit City 23 37     h2h
7 Colorado S. 24 37 1:0 20 Sep h2h
8 Hartford A. 24 37   0:0 h2h
9 Sacramento R. 23 36 27 Sep 0:1 h2h
10 FC Tulsa 23 36 1:0 1 Oct h2h
11 San Antonio 24 36 1:2 18 Oct h2h
12 Orange County 24 36 1:1 0:1 h2h
13 Lexington 24 34 2:1 1:4 h2h
14 Indy Eleven 23 33 2:2   h2h
15 Phoenix Rising 24 33 4 Oct 3:0 h2h
16 Louisville City 24 33     h2h
17 Rhode Island 22 32     h2h
18 Las Vegas L. 24 32 3:1 1:2 h2h
19 Oakland Roots 24 27 2:1 2:1 h2h
20 Miami FC 24 24     h2h
21 Birmingham L. 23 20   4:4 h2h
22 Loudoun Utd 23 20   0:0 h2h
23 Monterey Bay 24 18 11 Oct 2:5 h2h
24 Brooklyn FC 23 17     h2h
25 Sporting JAX 25 14     h2h

New Mexico stats rank the team in 3rd position in the the league table with 42 points, 1 point behind El Paso and 2 points above Charleston.








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 19 1837
GF per match 1.581.64 1.61
Goals conceded (GA) 131427
GA per match 1.081.27 1.17
GF + GA per match 2.672.912.78
GF+GA over 0.5 100%82%91%
GF+GA over 1.5 67%55%61%
GF+GA over 2.5 58%55%57%
GF+GA over 3.5 33%27%30%
GF+GA over 4.5 8%27%17%
GF+GA over 5.5 0%18%9%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 58%64%61%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 42%36%39%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 8%9%9%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 25%36%30%
Won-to-nil 25%18%22%
Failed to score 8%36%22%
Lost-to-nil 8%18%13%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 92%64%78%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 42%45%43%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 58%55%57%
Scored in both halves 8%36%22%
Both teams scored 67%45%57%
Conceding Rate 75%64%70%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 42%45%43%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 50%55%52%
Conceded in both halves 17%36%26%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 92%64%78%
GF over 1.5 50%36%43%
GF over 2.5 17%27%22%
GF over 3.5 0%27%13%
GF over 4.5 0%9%4%
GA over 0.5 75%64%70%
GA over 1.5 33%36%35%
GA over 2.5 0%18%9%
GA over 3.5 0%9%4%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in New Mexico matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 0%18%9%
Match total goals = 1 33%27%30%
Match total goals = 2 8%0%4%
Match total goals = 3 25%27%26%
Match total goals = 4 25%0%13%
Match total goals = 5+ 8%27%17%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 33%45%39%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 33%27%30%
Match total goals = 4+ 33%27%30%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  61 00
Away wins  30 20
Home & Away wins  91 20
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  20 00
Away defeats  20 10
Home & Away defeats  40 10

A majority of New Mexico's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (9 wins), while 3 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more.

A majority of New Mexico's defeats had a one-goal margin (4 defeats), while 1 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 57%
43%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)2.00
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)1.64
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 51%
49%
  % Goals conceded 48%
52%
  League average 55%
45%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 33 6  26%
Drawing at HT 76 13  57%
Losing at HT 22 4  17%
  Total 121123







Goal times


 flag New Mexico
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 4
GA 6
16-30 GF 5
GA 2
31-45 GF 6
GA 2
46-60 GF 3
GA 6
61-75 GF 10
GA 4
76-90 GF 9
GA 7
1st Half GF 15
41%
GA 10
37%
2nd Half GF 22
59%
GA 17
63%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 52
 Avg. minute goals conceded 51


  New Mexico
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 3
GA 3
16-30 GF 3
GA 1
31-45 GF 2
GA 1
46-60 GF 3
GA 5
61-75 GF 4
GA 1
76-90 GF 4
GA 2
1st Half GF 8
42%
GA 5
38%
2nd Half GF 11
58%
GA 8
62%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 48
  Avg. minute goals conceded 46


  New Mexico
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 1
GA 3
16-30 GF 2
GA 1
31-45 GF 4
GA 1
46-60 GF 0
GA 1
61-75 GF 6
GA 3
76-90 GF 5
GA 5
1st Half GF 7
39%
GA 5
36%
2nd Half GF 11
61%
GA 9
64%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 56
  Avg. minute goals conceded 56








New Mexico scores

FT at home
1-0 3 25%
2-2 2 17%
2-1 2 17%
3-2 1 8%
1-2 1 8%
3-1 1 8%
1-1 1 8%
0-1 1 8%
FT away
0-1 2 18%
0-0 2 18%
2-5 1 9%
4-4 1 9%
1-4 1 9%
1-2 1 9%
2-1 1 9%
3-0 1 9%
1-0 1 9%
The New Mexico score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 1-0 so far (3 times).
Half-time at home
0-0 5 42%
1-1 2 17%
0-1 2 17%
2-0 2 17%
2-1 1 8%
Half-time away
0-0 4 36%
1-1 2 18%
1-0 2 18%
1-2 1 9%
0-2 1 9%
0-1 1 9%





This season in the league

New Mexico have drawn their last 2 matches.
New Mexico have been undefeated in their last 3 matches.
New Mexico failed to keep a clean sheet in 9 of their 12 home matches.
New Mexico have scored in 11 of their 12 home matches.
New Mexico have been undefeated in their last 7 away matches.
22% of New Mexico's conceded goals occurred in the first 15 minutes.

View comments for all teams















Tables overview

Points

GP pts
Tampa Bay 24 48
El Paso 24 43
New Mexico 23 42
Charleston 24 40
Pittsburgh 25 38
Detroit City 23 37
Colorado S. 24 37
Hartford A. 24 37
Sacramento R. 23 36
FC Tulsa 23 36
San Antonio 24 36
Orange County 24 36
Lexington 24 34
Indy Eleven 23 33
Phoenix Risi. 24 33
Louisville C. 24 33
Rhode Island 22 32
Las Vegas L. 24 32
Oakland Roots 24 27
Miami FC 24 24
Birmingham L. 23 20
Loudoun Utd 23 20
Monterey Bay 24 18
Brooklyn FC 23 17
Sporting JAX 25 14

Form (last 8)

GP pts
El Paso 8 21
Hartford A. 8 17
Tampa Bay 8 16
New Mexico 8 15
Pittsburgh 8 15
Charleston 8 13
Sacramento R. 8 13
Rhode Island 8 13
FC Tulsa 8 13
Phoenix Risi. 8 13
Indy Eleven 8 12
Lexington 8 12
Colorado S. 8 12
San Antonio 8 11
Las Vegas L. 8 11
Detroit City 8 10
Louisville C. 8 9
Loudoun Utd 8 8
Orange County 8 8
Birmingham L. 8 6
Oakland Roots 8 6
Sporting JAX 8 6
Brooklyn FC 8 4
Monterey Bay 8 3
Miami FC 8 3

Home

GP pts
Indy Eleven 12 27
Charleston 11 26
Detroit City 11 24
New Mexico 12 24
Sacramento R. 11 23
Tampa Bay 11 23
Colorado S. 12 23
Pittsburgh 13 23
Phoenix Risi. 12 22
Lexington 12 22
FC Tulsa 12 21
Rhode Island 11 20
Hartford A. 11 20
El Paso 11 20
San Antonio 12 19
Louisville C. 12 18
Las Vegas L. 12 16
Miami FC 12 16
Monterey Bay 12 15
Orange County 12 15
Oakland Roots 13 14
Birmingham L. 13 13
Brooklyn FC 11 11
Loudoun Utd 13 11
Sporting JAX 12 9

Away

GP pts
Tampa Bay 13 25
El Paso 13 23
Orange County 12 21
New Mexico 11 18
Hartford A. 13 17
San Antonio 12 17
Las Vegas L. 12 16
FC Tulsa 11 15
Louisville C. 12 15
Pittsburgh 12 15
Colorado S. 12 14
Charleston 13 14
Detroit City 12 13
Sacramento R. 12 13
Oakland Roots 11 13
Lexington 12 12
Rhode Island 11 12
Phoenix Risi. 12 11
Loudoun Utd 10 9
Miami FC 12 8
Birmingham L. 10 7
Indy Eleven 11 6
Brooklyn FC 12 6
Sporting JAX 13 5
Monterey Bay 12 3

Offence

GP GF
Charleston 24 49
El Paso 24 41
Tampa Bay 24 41
Colorado S. 24 40
Louisville C. 24 39
Lexington 24 37
New Mexico 23 37
Orange County 24 34
Phoenix Risi. 24 34
Rhode Island 22 34
Birmingham L. 23 32
Indy Eleven 23 32
Las Vegas L. 24 31
Sacramento R. 23 30
Sporting JAX 25 30
Oakland Roots 24 29
San Antonio 24 29
Detroit City 23 28
Miami FC 24 28
Pittsburgh 25 28
FC Tulsa 23 27
Hartford A. 24 26
Loudoun Utd 23 26
Monterey Bay 24 25
Brooklyn FC 23 23

Defence

GP GA
Detroit City 23 19
Sacramento R. 23 20
FC Tulsa 23 21
Tampa Bay 24 23
Hartford A. 24 23
Rhode Island 22 24
Pittsburgh 25 25
New Mexico 23 27
San Antonio 24 28
Indy Eleven 23 28
Lexington 24 30
El Paso 24 30
Charleston 24 31
Phoenix Risi. 24 32
Orange County 24 34
Las Vegas L. 24 34
Oakland Roots 24 35
Colorado S. 24 37
Birmingham L. 23 38
Louisville C. 24 39
Loudoun Utd 23 40
Monterey Bay 24 42
Miami FC 24 42
Brooklyn FC 23 43
Sporting JAX 25 65

Offence (last 8)

GP GF
Charleston 8 18
New Mexico 8 17
Birmingham L. 8 16
Tampa Bay 8 16
El Paso 8 14
Hartford A. 8 14
Indy Eleven 8 14
Lexington 8 13
Louisville C. 8 13
Colorado S. 8 12
Phoenix Risi. 8 11
Sacramento R. 8 11
Rhode Island 8 10
FC Tulsa 8 9
Monterey Bay 8 9
Orange County 8 9
Pittsburgh 8 9
Loudoun Utd 8 8
Miami FC 8 8
San Antonio 8 8
Las Vegas L. 8 7
Sporting JAX 8 7
Brooklyn FC 8 6
Detroit City 8 5
Oakland Roots 8 5

Defence (last 8)

GP GA
Sacramento R. 8 5
Pittsburgh 8 5
FC Tulsa 8 5
El Paso 8 5
Detroit City 8 5
Rhode Island 8 6
Phoenix Risi. 8 8
Las Vegas L. 8 8
San Antonio 8 9
Hartford A. 8 9
Charleston 8 9
Tampa Bay 8 10
Lexington 8 10
Oakland Roots 8 11
Loudoun Utd 8 11
Indy Eleven 8 11
New Mexico 8 12
Louisville C. 8 14
Colorado S. 8 14
Orange County 8 16
Monterey Bay 8 17
Brooklyn FC 8 17
Miami FC 8 18
Birmingham L. 8 19
Sporting JAX 8 21

Offence (home)

GP GF
Charleston 11 33
Tampa Bay 11 24
Colorado S. 12 23
Indy Eleven 12 23
Phoenix Risi. 12 22
El Paso 11 20
Miami FC 12 20
Sacramento R. 11 20
Lexington 12 19
Loudoun Utd 13 19
New Mexico 12 19
Rhode Island 11 19
Sporting JAX 12 19
Birmingham L. 13 16
Hartford A. 11 16
Louisville C. 12 16
Monterey Bay 12 15
Pittsburgh 13 15
Detroit City 11 14
Oakland Roots 13 14
San Antonio 12 14
Las Vegas L. 12 13
Orange County 12 13
FC Tulsa 12 12
Brooklyn FC 11 11

Defence (home)

GP GA
Detroit City 11 5
FC Tulsa 12 7
Sacramento R. 11 9
Rhode Island 11 9
Charleston 11 9
Pittsburgh 13 10
Indy Eleven 12 10
Brooklyn FC 11 11
San Antonio 12 12
New Mexico 12 13
Lexington 12 13
Las Vegas L. 12 13
Hartford A. 11 13
Tampa Bay 11 14
Phoenix Risi. 12 15
Louisville C. 12 15
Colorado S. 12 15
Monterey Bay 12 17
Orange County 12 18
Oakland Roots 13 18
El Paso 11 18
Birmingham L. 13 18
Miami FC 12 22
Loudoun Utd 13 23
Sporting JAX 12 34

Offence (away)

GP GF
Louisville C. 12 23
El Paso 13 21
Orange County 12 21
Las Vegas L. 12 18
Lexington 12 18
New Mexico 11 18
Colorado S. 12 17
Tampa Bay 13 17
Birmingham L. 10 16
Charleston 13 16
FC Tulsa 11 15
Oakland Roots 11 15
Rhode Island 11 15
San Antonio 12 15
Detroit City 12 14
Pittsburgh 12 13
Brooklyn FC 12 12
Phoenix Risi. 12 12
Sporting JAX 13 11
Hartford A. 13 10
Monterey Bay 12 10
Sacramento R. 12 10
Indy Eleven 11 9
Miami FC 12 8
Loudoun Utd 10 7

Defence (away)

GP GA
Tampa Bay 13 9
Hartford A. 13 10
Sacramento R. 12 11
El Paso 13 12
New Mexico 11 14
FC Tulsa 11 14
Detroit City 12 14
Rhode Island 11 15
Pittsburgh 12 15
San Antonio 12 16
Orange County 12 16
Phoenix Risi. 12 17
Oakland Roots 11 17
Loudoun Utd 10 17
Lexington 12 17
Indy Eleven 11 18
Miami FC 12 20
Birmingham L. 10 20
Las Vegas L. 12 21
Colorado S. 12 22
Charleston 13 22
Louisville C. 12 24
Monterey Bay 12 25
Sporting JAX 13 31
Brooklyn FC 12 32






Total Match Goals stats


Match total goals stats

Teams GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Sporting JAX  25 3.80 100% 84% 72% 52% 36% 16% 60% 0% 40% 0% 40%
Charleston  24 3.33 100% 88% 62% 46% 25% 8% 50% 29% 21% 29% 21%
Louisville City  24 3.25 96% 83% 54% 33% 25% 17% 67% 21% 17% 17% 12%
Colorado S.  24 3.21 100% 75% 58% 42% 25% 8% 62% 12% 25% 12% 25%
Birmingham L.  23 3.04 91% 78% 57% 43% 22% 4% 74% 17% 17% 9% 9%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats


Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)

Last 8 matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Birmingham L.  8 4.38 100% 88% 88% 75% 50% 12% 88% 12% 0% 12% 0%
New Mexico  8 3.63 88% 75% 75% 38% 25% 25% 75% 25% 12% 12% 0%
Sporting JAX  8 3.50 100% 88% 62% 50% 50% 0% 38% 0% 62% 0% 62%
Charleston  8 3.38 100% 88% 75% 50% 25% 0% 50% 50% 0% 50% 0%
Louisville City  8 3.38 88% 88% 62% 25% 25% 12% 88% 12% 12% 0% 0%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)


Match total goals stats (at home)

Teams (at home) GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Sporting JAX  12 4.42 100% 83% 83% 58% 42% 33% 67% 0% 33% 0% 33%
Charleston  11 3.82 100% 100% 73% 55% 45% 9% 64% 36% 0% 36% 0%
Miami FC  12 3.50 92% 83% 67% 50% 33% 17% 67% 17% 25% 8% 17%
El Paso  11 3.45 100% 82% 64% 55% 45% 0% 73% 27% 0% 27% 0%
Tampa Bay  11 3.45 100% 82% 64% 45% 18% 9% 45% 45% 9% 45% 9%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats (at home)


Match total goals stats (away)

Teams (away) GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Louisville City  12 3.92 100% 92% 67% 42% 33% 25% 83% 17% 0% 17% 0%
Brooklyn FC  12 3.67 100% 100% 83% 58% 25% 0% 50% 8% 42% 8% 42%
Birmingham L.  10 3.60 100% 100% 70% 60% 30% 0% 90% 0% 10% 0% 10%
Colorado S.  12 3.25 100% 67% 50% 42% 25% 17% 50% 17% 33% 17% 33%
Las Vegas L.  12 3.25 100% 83% 58% 42% 33% 8% 67% 25% 8% 25% 8%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats (away)

Example
0.5+: matches where the total number of goals (team goals + opponent goals) was over 0.5





Segments Table

0 pt Segments table progression arrow 48 pts
5th Segment 4th Segment 3rd Segment 2nd Segment 1st Segment
up to 9.2 pts from 9.3 to 18.9 pts from 19.0 to 28.6 pts from 28.7 to 38.3 pts from 38.4 to 48 pts
(24)  18  Monterey Bay
(23)  17  Brooklyn FC
(25)  14  Sporting JAX 		(24)  27  Oakland Roots
(24)  24  Miami FC
(23)  20  Birmingham L.
(23)  20  Loudoun Utd 		(25)  38  Pittsburgh
(23)  37  Detroit City
(24)  37  Colorado S.
(24)  37  Hartford A.
(23)  36  Sacramento R.
(23)  36  FC Tulsa
(24)  36  San Antonio
(24)  36  Orange County
(24)  34  Lexington
(23)  33  Indy Eleven
(24)  33  Phoenix Rising
(24)  33  Louisville City
(22)  32  Rhode Island
(24)  32  Las Vegas L. 		(24)  48  Tampa Bay
(24)  43  El Paso
(23)  42  New Mexico
(24)  40  Charleston

The Segments Table is a visual representation splitting the teams into 5 segments. Each team is assigned to a specific segment, depending on the team's number of points. Each of the 5 segments spans one-fifth (20%) of the total points held by the team ranked 1st in the league. For each team, the number of matches played appears in green between brackets, and the number of points is displayed in black.








Sun 20 Sep
BRO - TUL 		Sun 20 Sep
CHA - MON 		Sun 20 Sep
DET - PIT 		Sun 20 Sep
LEX - ORA 		Sun 20 Sep
LOU - LOU 		Sun 20 Sep
RHO - MIA 		Sun 20 Sep
TPB - BIR 		Sun 20 Sep
COL - NMX 		Sun 20 Sep
PHO - ELP 		Sun 20 Sep
VEG - HAR




League statistics

296 matches played / 375
78.9% completed
Home wins:  44%
Over 1.5 goals:  72%
Draws:  29%
Over 2.5 goals:  50%
Away wins:  27%
Over 3.5 goals:  31%
Goals:  810 Home goals per match:  1.52
Goals per match:  2.74 Away goals per match:  1.22
    Both teams scored:  55%

Results

 Latest results
 Matches by date
 Matches by Matchweek
 Results grid
 Results filter
 Outcome Surprise-Levels

Tables

 Home / Away tables
 Wide table
 Tables by Date
 Form tables
 Projected points

Analysis

 Goals statistics
 Points performance
 Over / Under
 Scored / Conceded
 Home advantage
 Relative form
 Run-in analysis

Goal times

 When goals were scored
 1st-half / 2nd-half
 First team to score
 Goal types
 Lead durations
 Points Won/Lost
Home team scored first: 54% No goal scored: 9% Away team scored first: 37%
Average minute when home team scored first: 32 min. Average minute when away team scored first: 33 min.
Home team lead-defending rate: 59% Away team lead-defending rate: 52%
Home team equalizing rate: 48% Away team equalizing rate: 41%
Home team lead duration: 29% Teams level in goals: 51% Away team lead duration: 20%
Home PPG when home team scored first: 2.31 Away PPG when away team scored first: 2.08

More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 296 matches played in the league, a total of 810 goals have been scored (2.74 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including the league results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded.

 

SoccerSTATS.com - Public edition

SoccerSTATS.com provides football statistics, results and blog articles on national and international soccer competitions worldwide. Football fans can keep a tab on stats related to their favourite team or leagues of interest, and access a wide range of team performance data analytics and league standings, not only on the world's most famous professional leagues, but also on amateur and regional leagues over the world. Example of soccer statistics include league standings, form tables, top goal scorers, scoring stats, statistical previews and goal timing statistics.
Follow us on Twitter
F.A.Q. Contact Privacy Policy Do Not Sell My Information
Terms & conditions of use About us Cookie usage and options Membership information
Mobile app
To our loyal users: PLEASE SUPPORT US

Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. Products, services, promotional offers and other offerings from partners and advertisers are subject to terms and conditions. By using this website you certify that you agree with the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy and that you are over the age of 18 or that you have the permission of a parent or guardian to use this website, after your parent or guardian has carefully reviewed and agreed to the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy. The website's content is provided for informational purposes only is not to be relied upon as a professional opinion whatsover. Nothing on this website should be considered as advice. This website is not associated with nor endorsed by any league or competition (whether professional, collegiate or other types of leagues / competitions), federation, association, club or team. All trademarks, brands, images, logos and names appearing on this website belong to their respective owners.
Useful links (third-party websites):   www.gamcare.org.uk       www.begambleaware.org        gamblingtherapy.org
 
   
Copyright 1998-2026 SoccerSTATS.com
back to top