back to top
LEAGUES MATCHES STATS FAV BLOG MEMBER LOGIN
usa2
USA - USL Championship
LATEST MATCHES FORM H2H GOALS HALF-TIME TIMING FIRST GOAL FAVOURITE
🔍

Birmingham L. vs Tampa Bay

advertisement


Visual table

  GP Pts
1  Tampa Bay 26 52
2  El Paso 26 47
3  Charleston 26 46
4  Detroit City 26 44
5  Sacramento R. 26 43
6  New Mexico 26 43
7  FC Tulsa 26 41
8  Lexington 26 40
9  Colorado S. 26 39
10  Hartford A. 26 39
11  Orange County 26 39
12  San Antonio 26 38
13  Pittsburgh 27 38
14  Louisville City 26 37
15  Rhode Island 25 35
16  Indy Eleven 26 33
17  Oakland Roots 26 33
18  Phoenix Rising 26 33
19  Las Vegas L. 26 33
20  Miami FC 27 33
21  Birmingham L. 25 23
22  Loudoun Utd 25 23
23  Monterey Bay 26 18
24  Brooklyn FC 26 18
25  Sporting JAX 27 14

 
Sun 8 Mar 2026
Birmingham L.0 1Tampa Bay
0:1 Marco Micaletto (57)






Seasonal streaks


 

 
Lead durations in 90 minutes of regular time
090
Birmingham L.Level (57)Tampa Bay (33)
Lead durations tables
  How are the duration values calculated?⌄

To calculate the above duration values based on a total of 90 minutes, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are considered scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are considered scored on the 90th minute.






 






 flag

Birmingham L.

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 14 3 7 4  
  Away 11 1 4 6  
  Total 25 4 11 10  
PPG (Home): 1.14
PPG (Away): 0.64
PPG (Total): 0.92


Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game0.92 0.75 -18.5%
AVG Goals For1.44 2.25 +56.3%
AVG Goals Against1.68 2.63 +56.5%



Birmingham L.'s progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
8 Mar Birmingham L. 0:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Marco Micaletto (57)
Tampa Bay - - + 0-0
11 Mar Birmingham L. 0:0

Hartford A. - + + 0-0
21 Mar Charleston 3:2

     0-1   Romario Williams (25)

     0-2   S. Shashoua (27)

---------------------------------------
1-2   Colton Swan (58)

2-2   Emilio Ycaza (80) pen.

3-2   Emilio Ycaza (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 0-2
4 Apr Loudoun Utd 2:2

     0-1   Tyler Pasher (16)

1-1   James Murphy (31)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   Tyler Pasher (54)

2-2   A. Ordóñez (79) pen.
Birmingham L. + - - 1-1
12 Apr Birmingham L. 1:0

1-0   Sebastian Tregarthen (25)

Pittsburgh - + - 1-0
19 Apr Birmingham L. 2:2

1-0   Tyler Pasher (39) pen.

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Edward Kizza (68)

     1-2   Josh OBrien (81)

2-2   Sam McIllhatton (89)
Indy Eleven + - - 1-0
2 May Rhode Island 1:3

     0-1   Sebastian Tregarthen (3)

1-1   Leo Afonso (17)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   Phanuel Kavita (48)

     1-3   Ronaldo Damus (57)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-1
8 May Birmingham L. 0:0

Miami FC - + + 0-0
24 May Monterey Bay 2:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Riley Bidois (60)

2-0   E. Blancas (78)
Birmingham L. - - + 0-0
4 Jun Birmingham L. 1:1

1-0   G. Diarbian (10)

     1-1   Babacar Niang (42)

Louisville City - - - 1-1
14 Jun Birmingham L. 1:2

     0-1   Oalex Anderson (15)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Johnny Rodriguez (60)

1-2   Sebastián Saucedo (89)
Las Vegas L. + - - 0-1
17 Jun Oakland Roots 1:1

     0-1   Peter-Lee Vassell (45)

---------------------------------------
1-1   P. Wilson (90)
Birmingham L. - - - 0-1
21 Jun Birmingham L. 1:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Abdellatif Aboukoura (67)

1-1   Sebastian Tregarthen (89)
Loudoun Utd - - - 0-0
3 Jul Birmingham L. 1:2

     0-1   Rio Hope-Gund (2)

1-1   Tyler Pasher (24) pen.

---------------------------------------
     1-2   Ben Morris (90)
Detroit City + - - 1-1
5 Jul Miami FC 1:1

1-0   Arney Rocha (41)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Peter-Lee Vassell (78)
Birmingham L. - - - 1-0
29 Jul Louisville City 2:1

1-0   Kevon Lambert (6)

     1-1   S. Shashoua (42)

---------------------------------------
2-1   Kevon Lambert (74)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-1
2 Aug Birmingham L. 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Ronaldo Damus (63)
Rhode Island - + - 0-0
16 Aug Colorado S. 3:2

     0-1   Nico Brown (24)

1-1   Garven Metusala (45)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   Serge Ngoma Jr. (86)

2-2   Adrien Perez (90)

3-2   Juan Tejada (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-1
23 Aug Birmingham L. 2:3

---------------------------------------
1-0   Ronaldo Damus (55)

     1-1   Emil Jaaskelainen (58)

     1-2   Wan Kuzain (76)

2-2   Romario Williams (90)

     2-3   Danny Wilson (90)
Sporting JAX + - - 0-0
29 Aug Hartford A. 3:2

     0-1   Romario Williams (21)

     0-2   Romario Williams (39)

1-2   Barry Coffey (42)

2-2   Michee Ngalina (45)

---------------------------------------
3-2   Jordan Scarlett (74)
Birmingham L. + - - 2-2
5 Sep Indy Eleven 2:2

1-0   Joe Hafferty (20)

     1-1   Tyler Pasher (40)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   Romario Williams (66)

2-2   Dylan Sing (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-1
12 Sep Birmingham L. 2:2

1-0   Sebastian Tregarthen (11)

     1-1   Miguel Berry (14)

     1-2   Miguel Berry (21)

2-2   Romario Williams (39)

Charleston + - - 2-2
17 Sep Birmingham L. 4:4

1-0   Romario Williams (11)

     1-1   Zico Bailey (16)

     1-2   Niall Reid-Stephen (19)

---------------------------------------
     1-3   Greg Hurst (64)

     1-4   Joseph Melto Quiah (66)

2-4   Ronaldo Damus (77)

3-4   G. Diarbian (87)

4-4   Ronaldo Damus (90)
New Mexico + - - 1-2
19 Sep Tampa Bay 4:0

1-0   A J Paterson (o.g.) (30)

2-0   Matt Myers (39)

---------------------------------------
3-0   Matt Myers (56)

4-0   Matt Myers (60)
Birmingham L. + - + 2-0
23 Sep Birmingham L. 4:0

1-0   Peter-Lee Vassell (o.g.) (14)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Serge Ngoma Jr. (48)

3-0   Sebastián Saucedo (84) pen.

4-0   Ronaldo Damus (90)
Brooklyn FC + + - 1-0



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
3 Oct Detroit City vs Birmingham L. 2.15 0.64
10 Oct Sporting JAX vs Birmingham L. 0.69 0.64
18 Oct Birmingham L. vs Loudoun Utd 1.14 1.00
21 Oct Brooklyn FC (pp.) Birmingham L. 0.92 0.64
24 Oct Pittsburgh vs Birmingham L. 1.77 0.64
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.31

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins 1-1
Consecutive draws ---
Consecutive defeats -1-
No win -8-
No draw 112
No defeat 3-1
1 goal scored or more 9-1
1 goal conceded or more -11-
No goal scored -1-
No goal conceded 1-1
GF+GA over 2.5 458
GF+GA under 2.5 ---
Scored at least twice 4-1










Comparison with league average


Birmingham L. (25 matches) vs league average

(overall)Birmingham L. League AVG
Points per game  0.92 1.36
% Wins  16% 36%
% Draws  44% 29%
% Defeats  40% 36%
Goals scored per game  1.44 1.37
Goals conceded per game  1.68 1.37
% Clean sheets  20% 28%
% Failed To Score  20% 28%
% Won To Nil  12% 18%
% Lost To Nil  12% 18%
% Team scored first  56% 45%
% Opponent scored first  36% 45%
Average minute scored first  26 32
Average minute conceded first  33 32
Lead-defending rate  22% 57%
Equalizing rate  47% 43%
% Time leading  23% 24%
% Time level in goals  56% 52%
% Time trailing  21% 24%
PPG when scored first  1.29 2.24
PPG when conceded first  0.33 0.55
Total goals per game  3.12 2.73
% over 1.5 goals  80% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  60% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  48% 32%
% both teams scored  68% 54%

Birmingham L. at home (14 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Birmingham L. League AVG
Points per game  1.14 1.61
% Wins  21% 44%
% Draws  50% 29%
% Defeats  29% 27%
Goals scored per game  1.43 1.53
Goals conceded per game  1.29 1.21
% Clean sheets  36% 32%
% Failed To Score  21% 23%
% Won To Nil  21% 23%
% Lost To Nil  7% 14%
% Team scored first  57% 53%
% Opponent scored first  29% 38%
Average minute scored first  28 32
Average minute conceded first  35 32
Lead-defending rate  38% 61%
Equalizing rate  60% 49%
% Time leading  19% 28%
% Time level in goals  60% 52%
% Time trailing  21% 20%
PPG when scored first  1.63 2.35
PPG when conceded first  0.25 0.70
Total goals per game  2.71 2.73
% over 1.5 goals  64% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  50% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  36% 32%
% both teams scored  57% 54%

Birmingham L. away (11 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Birmingham L. League AVG
Points per game  0.64 1.11
% Wins  9% 27%
% Draws  36% 29%
% Defeats  55% 44%
Goals scored per game  1.45 1.21
Goals conceded per game  2.18 1.53
% Clean sheets  0% 23%
% Failed To Score  18% 32%
% Won To Nil  0% 14%
% Lost To Nil  18% 23%
% Team scored first  55% 38%
% Opponent scored first  45% 53%
Average minute scored first  22 32
Average minute conceded first  31 32
Lead-defending rate  10% 51%
Equalizing rate  33% 39%
% Time leading  27% 20%
% Time level in goals  51% 52%
% Time trailing  22% 28%
PPG when scored first  0.83 2.08
PPG when conceded first  0.40 0.44
Total goals per game  3.64 2.73
% over 1.5 goals  100% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  73% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  64% 32%
% both teams scored  82% 54%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Birmingham L.
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 14 / 25 56%
  Opponent scored first 9 / 25 36%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 5 / 25 20%
  Opponent was leading at HT 4 / 25 16%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 20.4 min. 23%
  Average minutes level in goals 50.5 min. 56%
  Average minutes trailing 19.1 min. 21%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Birmingham L. have been in the lead for an average duration of 20.4 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 19.1 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 25

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 18
  Equalizer goals conceded 14
  Lead defending rate * (1) 22%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 19
  Equalizer goals scored 9
  Equalizing rate * (2) 47%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 9
  Non-crucial goals conceded 9

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Birmingham L. have taken the lead 18 times and have conceded an equalizer on 14 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 22% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 78%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 19 times that Birmingham L.'s opponents have taken the lead, Birmingham L. have managed to score an equalizer on 9 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 47%.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 8 / 14 57%
  Opponent scored first 4 / 14 29%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 3 / 14 21%
  Opponent was leading at HT 2 / 14 14%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 17.1 min. 19%
  Average minutes level in goals 54.1 min. 60%
  Average minutes trailing 18.8 min. 21%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Birmingham L. have been in the lead for an average duration of 17.1 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 18.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 14

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 8
  Equalizer goals conceded 5
  Lead defending rate * (1) 38%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 10
  Equalizer goals scored 6
  Equalizing rate * (2) 60%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 6
  Non-crucial goals conceded 3

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Birmingham L. have taken the lead 8 times and have conceded an equalizer on 5 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 38% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 62%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 10 times that Birmingham L.'s opponents have taken the lead when Birmingham L. were playing at home, Birmingham L. have managed to score an equalizer on 6 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 60%.



 flag Birmingham L.
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 6 / 11 55%
  Opponent scored first 5 / 11 45%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 2 / 11 18%
  Opponent was leading at HT 2 / 11 18%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 24.5 min. 27%
  Average minutes level in goals 46.0 min. 51%
  Average minutes trailing 19.5 min. 22%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Birmingham L. have been in the lead for an average duration of 24.5 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 19.5 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 11

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 10
  Equalizer goals conceded 9
  Lead defending rate * (1) 10%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 9
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 33%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 3
  Non-crucial goals conceded 6

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Birmingham L. have taken the lead 10 times and have conceded an equalizer on 9 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 10% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 90%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 9 times that Birmingham L.'s opponents have taken the lead when Birmingham L. were playing away, Birmingham L. have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 33%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Tampa Bay 26 52 0:1 4:0 h2h
2 El Paso 26 47     h2h
3 Charleston 26 46 2:2 3:2 h2h
4 Detroit City 26 44 1:2 3 Oct h2h
5 Sacramento R. 26 43     h2h
6 New Mexico 26 43 4:4   h2h
7 FC Tulsa 26 41     h2h
8 Lexington 26 40     h2h
9 Colorado S. 26 39   3:2 h2h
10 Hartford A. 26 39 0:0 3:2 h2h
11 Orange County 26 39     h2h
12 San Antonio 26 38     h2h
13 Pittsburgh 27 38 1:0 24 Oct h2h
14 Louisville City 26 37 1:1 2:1 h2h
15 Rhode Island 25 35 1:0 1:3 h2h
16 Indy Eleven 26 33 2:2 2:2 h2h
17 Oakland Roots 26 33   1:1 h2h
18 Phoenix Rising 26 33     h2h
19 Las Vegas L. 26 33 1:2   h2h
20 Miami FC 27 33 0:0 1:1 h2h
21 Birmingham L. 25 23
22 Loudoun Utd 25 23 18 Oct 2:2 h2h
23 Monterey Bay 26 18   2:0 h2h
24 Brooklyn FC 26 18 4:0 21 Oct h2h
25 Sporting JAX 27 14 2:3 10 Oct h2h








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 20 1636
GF per match 1.431.45 1.44
Goals conceded (GA) 182442
GA per match 1.292.18 1.68
GF + GA per match 2.713.643.12
GF+GA over 0.5 86%100%92%
GF+GA over 1.5 64%100%80%
GF+GA over 2.5 50%73%60%
GF+GA over 3.5 36%64%48%
GF+GA over 4.5 14%27%20%
GF+GA over 5.5 7%0%4%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 57%91%72%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 29%73%48%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 14%9%12%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 36%0%20%
Won-to-nil 21%0%12%
Failed to score 21%18%20%
Lost-to-nil 7%18%12%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 79%82%80%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 50%73%60%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 50%45%48%
Scored in both halves 21%36%28%
Both teams scored 57%82%68%
Conceding Rate 64%100%80%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 36%73%52%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 50%82%64%
Conceded in both halves 21%55%36%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 79%82%80%
GF over 1.5 36%55%44%
GF over 2.5 14%9%12%
GF over 3.5 14%0%8%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 64%100%80%
GA over 1.5 43%73%56%
GA over 2.5 14%36%24%
GA over 3.5 7%9%8%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Birmingham L. matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 14%0%8%
Match total goals = 1 21%0%12%
Match total goals = 2 14%27%20%
Match total goals = 3 14%9%12%
Match total goals = 4 21%36%28%
Match total goals = 5+ 14%27%20%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 36%0%20%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 29%36%32%
Match total goals = 4+ 36%64%48%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  20 01
Away wins  01 00
Home & Away wins  21 01
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  40 00
Away defeats  41 01
Home & Away defeats  81 01
Birmingham L. have obtained as many one-goal margin wins as wins with a margin of 2 goals or more (2 wins for each).

A majority of Birmingham L.'s defeats had a one-goal margin (8 defeats), while 2 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 70%
30%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.14
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)0.64
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 56%
44%
  % Goals conceded 43%
57%
  League average 56%
44%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 32 5  20%
Drawing at HT 97 16  64%
Losing at HT 22 4  16%
  Total 141125







Goal times


 flag Birmingham L.
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 5
GA 4
16-30 GF 7
GA 6
31-45 GF 6
GA 7
46-60 GF 5
GA 7
61-75 GF 2
GA 6
76-90 GF 11
GA 12
1st Half GF 18
50%
GA 17
40%
2nd Half GF 18
50%
GA 25
60%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 50
 Avg. minute goals conceded 55


  Birmingham L.
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 4
GA 3
16-30 GF 2
GA 3
31-45 GF 2
GA 1
46-60 GF 2
GA 3
61-75 GF 1
GA 4
76-90 GF 9
GA 4
1st Half GF 8
40%
GA 7
39%
2nd Half GF 12
60%
GA 11
61%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 56
  Avg. minute goals conceded 50


  Birmingham L.
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 1
GA 1
16-30 GF 5
GA 3
31-45 GF 4
GA 6
46-60 GF 3
GA 4
61-75 GF 1
GA 2
76-90 GF 2
GA 8
1st Half GF 10
62%
GA 10
42%
2nd Half GF 6
38%
GA 14
58%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 42
  Avg. minute goals conceded 58








Birmingham L. scores

FT at home
2-2 2 14%
1-2 2 14%
1-1 2 14%
1-0 2 14%
0-0 2 14%
4-4 1 7%
2-3 1 7%
0-1 1 7%
4-0 1 7%
FT away
3-2 3 27%
2-2 2 18%
1-1 2 18%
1-3 1 9%
2-1 1 9%
4-0 1 9%
2-0 1 9%
The Birmingham L. score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 3-2 so far (3 times).
Half-time at home
0-0 6 43%
1-0 3 21%
1-1 2 14%
2-2 1 7%
1-2 1 7%
0-1 1 7%
Half-time away
1-1 5 45%
2-2 1 9%
0-2 1 9%
0-1 1 9%
2-0 1 9%
1-0 1 9%
0-0 1 9%





This season in the league

Birmingham L. failed to keep a clean sheet in 9 of their 14 home matches.
Birmingham L. failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their 11 away matches.
Birmingham L. have scored in 9 of their 11 away matches.
Birmingham L. have failed to win in their last 8 away matches.
Birmingham L. have scored in each of their last 9 home matches.
Birmingham L. failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 11 away matches.
Birmingham L. have scored a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 4 home matches.
Birmingham L. have conceded a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 5 away matches.

View comments for all teams



 flag

Tampa Bay

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 12 8 2 2  
  Away 14 7 5 2  
  Total 26 15 7 4  
PPG (Home): 2.17
PPG (Away): 1.86
PPG (Total): 2.00


Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game2.00 1.75 -12.5%
AVG Goals For1.73 1.50 -13.3%
AVG Goals Against0.88 0.50 -43.2%



Tampa Bay's progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
8 Mar Birmingham L. 0:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Marco Micaletto (57)
Tampa Bay - + - 0-0
21 Mar Tampa Bay 3:0

1-0   R. Cicerone (45)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Matt Myers (77)

3-0   Evan Conway (90)
Pittsburgh + + - 1-0
28 Mar Tampa Bay 3:1

1-0   S. Cruz (7)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Thor Úlfarsson (48)

2-1   Adam Beaudry (o.g.) (52)

3-1   Matt Myers (80)
Loudoun Utd + - - 1-0
4 Apr Sporting JAX 0:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Evan Conway (90)
Tampa Bay - + - 0-0
11 Apr Tampa Bay 2:2

1-0   Marco Micaletto (3)

     1-1   Charlie Ostrem (o.g.) (12)

2-1   R. Cicerone (45)

---------------------------------------
     2-2   W. Prentice (49)
Oakland Roots + - - 2-1
18 Apr Charleston 1:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   S. Cruz (80)

1-1   Douglas Martínez (82)
Tampa Bay - - - 0-0
2 May Tampa Bay 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Mattheus (53)
Indy Eleven - + - 0-0
9 May Rhode Island 1:1

     0-1   Pedro Dolabella (29)

---------------------------------------
1-1   Jerome Williams (85)
Tampa Bay - - - 0-1
21 May New Mexico 0:1

     0-1   Louis Pérez (5)

Tampa Bay - + - 0-1
23 May Tampa Bay 3:0

1-0   Pedro Dolabella (2)

2-0   Matt Myers (28)

3-0   Louis Pérez (33)

Phoenix Rising + + - 3-0
30 May Louisville City 0:2

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Matt Myers (76)

     0-2   Max Schneider (90)
Tampa Bay - + - 0-0
11 Jun Tampa Bay 2:2

1-0   Louis Pérez (30)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Maalique Foster (55)

     1-2   Colton Swan (80)

2-2   Mattheus (90)
Charleston + - - 1-0
13 Jun Tampa Bay 0:1

     0-1   Sebastian Anderson (20)

Hartford A. - - + 0-1
20 Jun Brooklyn FC 0:2

     0-1   R. Cicerone (29)

     0-2   Matt Myers (33) pen.

Tampa Bay - + - 0-2
4 Jul Tampa Bay 1:4

     0-1   Xavier Zengue (12)

     0-2   Nick Firmino (14)

     0-3   Marcus Epps (44)

---------------------------------------
1-3   Gino Vivi (78)

     1-4   Tarik Scott (86)
Lexington + - - 0-3
18 Jul Loudoun Utd 1:1

     0-1   Pedro Dolabella (21) pen.

---------------------------------------
1-1   Thor Úlfarsson (82)
Tampa Bay - - - 0-1
25 Jul Miami FC 2:3

     0-1   R. Cicerone (10)

     0-2   Matt Myers (12)

1-2   Arney Rocha (45) pen.

---------------------------------------
2-2   Jürgen Locadia (76)

     2-3   Marco Micaletto (80)
Tampa Bay + - - 1-2
2 Aug Tampa Bay 5:4

     0-1   Jansen Wilson (21)

     0-2   Chris Donovan (25)

     0-3   Jake Morris (29)

---------------------------------------
1-3   R. Cicerone (48)

2-3   Marco Micaletto (51)

3-3   Matt Myers (54)

     3-4   Jake Morris (63)

4-4   R. Cicerone (86)

5-4   Matt Myers (89)
Louisville City + - - 0-3
9 Aug Orange County 0:3

     0-1   Matt Myers (24) pen.

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Marco Micaletto (58)

     0-3   Karsen Henderlong (89)
Tampa Bay + + - 0-1
15 Aug Tampa Bay 2:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Conner Antley (61)

2-0   Louis Pérez (90)
Rhode Island - + - 0-0
22 Aug Detroit City 1:0

1-0   Alasanne Ates Diouf (36)

Tampa Bay - - + 1-0
29 Aug Pittsburgh 0:0

Tampa Bay - + + 0-0
5 Sep Tampa Bay 2:0

1-0   Louis Pérez (24)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Evan Conway (90)
Brooklyn FC - + - 1-0
12 Sep Hartford A. 3:1

1-0   Michael Adedokun (26)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Sadat Anaku (48)

     2-1   Laurence Wyke (79)

3-1   Michee Ngalina (87) pen.
Tampa Bay + - - 1-0
19 Sep Tampa Bay 4:0

1-0   A J Paterson (o.g.) (30)

2-0   Matt Myers (39)

---------------------------------------
3-0   Matt Myers (56)

4-0   Matt Myers (60)
Birmingham L. + + - 2-0
27 Sep San Antonio 0:0

Tampa Bay - + + 0-0



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
3 Oct Tampa Bay vs Miami FC 2.17 1.00
10 Oct Indy Eleven vs Tampa Bay 1.93 1.86
17 Oct Tampa Bay vs Detroit City 2.17 1.23
24 Oct Tampa Bay vs Sporting JAX 2.17 0.36
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.13

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins 4--
Consecutive draws -11
Consecutive defeats ---
No win -41
No draw 6--
No defeat 412
1 goal scored or more 5--
1 goal conceded or more ---
No goal scored -11
No goal conceded 312
GF+GA over 2.5 1--
GF+GA under 2.5 -11
Scored at least twice 4--










Comparison with league average


Tampa Bay (26 matches) vs league average

(overall)Tampa Bay League AVG
Points per game  2.00 1.36
% Wins  58% 36%
% Draws  27% 29%
% Defeats  15% 36%
Goals scored per game  1.73 1.37
Goals conceded per game  0.88 1.37
% Clean sheets  54% 28%
% Failed To Score  15% 28%
% Won To Nil  46% 18%
% Lost To Nil  8% 18%
% Team scored first  73% 45%
% Opponent scored first  19% 45%
Average minute scored first  36 32
Average minute conceded first  23 32
Lead-defending rate  65% 57%
Equalizing rate  43% 43%
% Time leading  38% 24%
% Time level in goals  47% 52%
% Time trailing  14% 24%
PPG when scored first  2.47 2.24
PPG when conceded first  0.60 0.55
Total goals per game  2.62 2.73
% over 1.5 goals  69% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  42% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  31% 32%
% both teams scored  38% 54%

Tampa Bay at home (12 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Tampa Bay League AVG
Points per game  2.17 1.61
% Wins  67% 44%
% Draws  17% 29%
% Defeats  17% 27%
Goals scored per game  2.33 1.53
Goals conceded per game  1.17 1.21
% Clean sheets  50% 32%
% Failed To Score  8% 23%
% Won To Nil  50% 23%
% Lost To Nil  8% 14%
% Team scored first  75% 53%
% Opponent scored first  25% 38%
Average minute scored first  28 32
Average minute conceded first  18 32
Lead-defending rate  67% 61%
Equalizing rate  60% 49%
% Time leading  41% 28%
% Time level in goals  39% 52%
% Time trailing  20% 20%
PPG when scored first  2.56 2.35
PPG when conceded first  1.00 0.70
Total goals per game  3.50 2.73
% over 1.5 goals  83% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  67% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  50% 32%
% both teams scored  42% 54%

Tampa Bay away (14 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Tampa Bay League AVG
Points per game  1.86 1.11
% Wins  50% 27%
% Draws  36% 29%
% Defeats  14% 44%
Goals scored per game  1.21 1.21
Goals conceded per game  0.64 1.53
% Clean sheets  57% 23%
% Failed To Score  21% 32%
% Won To Nil  43% 14%
% Lost To Nil  7% 23%
% Team scored first  71% 38%
% Opponent scored first  14% 53%
Average minute scored first  42 32
Average minute conceded first  31 32
Lead-defending rate  64% 51%
Equalizing rate  0% 39%
% Time leading  36% 20%
% Time level in goals  55% 52%
% Time trailing  9% 28%
PPG when scored first  2.40 2.08
PPG when conceded first  0.00 0.44
Total goals per game  1.86 2.73
% over 1.5 goals  57% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  21% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  14% 32%
% both teams scored  36% 54%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Tampa Bay
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 19 / 26 73%
  Opponent scored first 5 / 26 19%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 13 / 26 50%
  Opponent was leading at HT 5 / 26 19%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 34.5 min. 38%
  Average minutes level in goals 42.7 min. 47%
  Average minutes trailing 12.8 min. 14%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Tampa Bay have been in the lead for an average duration of 34.5 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 12.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Tampa Bay
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 26

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 23
  Equalizer goals conceded 8
  Lead defending rate * (1) 65%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 7
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 43%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 19
  Non-crucial goals conceded 8

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Tampa Bay have taken the lead 23 times and have conceded an equalizer on 8 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 65% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 35%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 7 times that Tampa Bay's opponents have taken the lead, Tampa Bay have managed to score an equalizer on 3 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 43%.


 flag Tampa Bay
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 9 / 12 75%
  Opponent scored first 3 / 12 25%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 7 / 12 58%
  Opponent was leading at HT 3 / 12 25%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 36.9 min. 41%
  Average minutes level in goals 35.3 min. 39%
  Average minutes trailing 17.8 min. 20%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Tampa Bay have been in the lead for an average duration of 36.9 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 17.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Tampa Bay
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 12

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 12
  Equalizer goals conceded 4
  Lead defending rate * (1) 67%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 5
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 60%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 13
  Non-crucial goals conceded 5

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Tampa Bay have taken the lead 12 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 67% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 33%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 5 times that Tampa Bay's opponents have taken the lead when Tampa Bay were playing at home, Tampa Bay have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 60%.



 flag Tampa Bay
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 10 / 14 71%
  Opponent scored first 2 / 14 14%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 6 / 14 43%
  Opponent was leading at HT 2 / 14 14%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 32.4 min. 36%
  Average minutes level in goals 49.1 min. 55%
  Average minutes trailing 8.4 min. 9%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Tampa Bay have been in the lead for an average duration of 32.4 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 8.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Tampa Bay
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 14

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 11
  Equalizer goals conceded 4
  Lead defending rate * (1) 64%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 2
  Equalizer goals scored 0
  Equalizing rate * (2) 0%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 6
  Non-crucial goals conceded 3

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Tampa Bay have taken the lead 11 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 64% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 36%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 2 times that Tampa Bay's opponents have taken the lead when Tampa Bay were playing away, Tampa Bay have managed to score an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 0%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Tampa Bay 26 52
2 El Paso 26 47     h2h
3 Charleston 26 46 2:2 1:1 h2h
4 Detroit City 26 44 17 Oct 1:0 h2h
5 Sacramento R. 26 43     h2h
6 New Mexico 26 43   0:1 h2h
7 FC Tulsa 26 41     h2h
8 Lexington 26 40 1:4   h2h
9 Colorado S. 26 39     h2h
10 Hartford A. 26 39 0:1 3:1 h2h
11 Orange County 26 39   0:3 h2h
12 San Antonio 26 38   0:0 h2h
13 Pittsburgh 27 38 3:0 0:0 h2h
14 Louisville City 26 37 5:4 0:2 h2h
15 Rhode Island 25 35 2:0 1:1 h2h
16 Indy Eleven 26 33 1:0 10 Oct h2h
17 Oakland Roots 26 33 2:2   h2h
18 Phoenix Rising 26 33 3:0   h2h
19 Las Vegas L. 26 33     h2h
20 Miami FC 27 33 3 Oct 2:3 h2h
21 Birmingham L. 25 23 4:0 0:1 h2h
22 Loudoun Utd 25 23 3:1 1:1 h2h
23 Monterey Bay 26 18     h2h
24 Brooklyn FC 26 18 2:0 0:2 h2h
25 Sporting JAX 27 14 24 Oct 0:1 h2h

Tampa Bay stats rank the team in 1st position in the the league table with 52 points, 5 points above El Paso.








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 28 1745
GF per match 2.331.21 1.73
Goals conceded (GA) 14923
GA per match 1.170.64 0.88
GF + GA per match 3.501.862.62
GF+GA over 0.5 100%86%92%
GF+GA over 1.5 83%57%69%
GF+GA over 2.5 67%21%42%
GF+GA over 3.5 50%14%31%
GF+GA over 4.5 17%7%12%
GF+GA over 5.5 8%0%4%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 83%57%69%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 42%14%27%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 33%7%19%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 50%57%54%
Won-to-nil 50%43%46%
Failed to score 8%21%15%
Lost-to-nil 8%7%8%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 92%79%85%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 58%43%50%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 75%50%62%
Scored in both halves 42%14%27%
Both teams scored 42%36%38%
Conceding Rate 50%43%46%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 33%21%27%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 42%36%38%
Conceded in both halves 25%14%19%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 92%79%85%
GF over 1.5 75%29%50%
GF over 2.5 42%14%27%
GF over 3.5 17%0%8%
GF over 4.5 8%0%4%
GA over 0.5 50%43%46%
GA over 1.5 33%14%23%
GA over 2.5 17%7%12%
GA over 3.5 17%0%8%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Tampa Bay matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 0%14%8%
Match total goals = 1 17%29%23%
Match total goals = 2 17%36%27%
Match total goals = 3 17%7%12%
Match total goals = 4 33%7%19%
Match total goals = 5+ 17%7%12%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 17%43%31%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 33%43%38%
Match total goals = 4+ 50%14%31%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  23 21
Away wins  42 10
Home & Away wins  65 31
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  10 10
Away defeats  11 00
Home & Away defeats  21 10

A majority of Tampa Bay's wins have been obtained with a margin of 2 goals or more (9 wins), while 6 of their wins had a one-goal margin. Tampa Bay have conceded as many one-goal margin defeats as defeats with a margin of 2 goals or more (2 defeats for each).









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 50%
50%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)2.17
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)1.86
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 62%
38%
  % Goals conceded 61%
39%
  League average 56%
44%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 76 13  50%
Drawing at HT 26 8  31%
Losing at HT 32 5  19%
  Total 121426







Goal times


 flag Tampa Bay
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 6
GA 3
16-30 GF 8
GA 5
31-45 GF 5
GA 3
46-60 GF 9
GA 4
61-75 GF 1
GA 1
76-90 GF 16
GA 7
1st Half GF 19
42%
GA 11
48%
2nd Half GF 26
58%
GA 12
52%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 52
 Avg. minute goals conceded 49


  Tampa Bay
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 3
GA 3
16-30 GF 4
GA 4
31-45 GF 4
GA 1
46-60 GF 7
GA 3
61-75 GF 1
GA 1
76-90 GF 9
GA 2
1st Half GF 11
39%
GA 8
57%
2nd Half GF 17
61%
GA 6
43%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 53
  Avg. minute goals conceded 40


  Tampa Bay
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 3
GA 0
16-30 GF 4
GA 1
31-45 GF 1
GA 2
46-60 GF 2
GA 1
61-75 GF 0
GA 0
76-90 GF 7
GA 5
1st Half GF 8
47%
GA 3
33%
2nd Half GF 9
53%
GA 6
67%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 51
  Avg. minute goals conceded 63








Tampa Bay scores

FT at home
2-2 2 17%
3-0 2 17%
2-0 2 17%
5-4 1 8%
1-4 1 8%
3-1 1 8%
0-1 1 8%
4-0 1 8%
1-0 1 8%
FT away
1-1 3 21%
0-1 3 21%
0-2 2 14%
0-0 2 14%
2-3 1 7%
0-3 1 7%
3-1 1 7%
1-0 1 7%

Half-time at home
1-0 4 33%
0-3 2 17%
0-0 2 17%
2-1 1 8%
0-1 1 8%
3-0 1 8%
2-0 1 8%
Half-time away
0-0 6 43%
0-1 4 29%
1-0 2 14%
1-2 1 7%
0-2 1 7%





This season in the league

Tampa Bay have scored in 11 of their 12 home matches.
Tampa Bay have kept a clean sheet in 8 of their 14 away matches.
Tampa Bay have scored in 11 of their 14 away matches.
61% of Tampa Bay's conceded goals were conceded at home.
Tampa Bay have scored the opening goal in 19 of their 26 matches.
Tampa Bay were leading at half-time in 13 of their 26 matches.
Tampa Bay have won their last 4 home matches.
Tampa Bay have kept a clean sheet in their last 3 home matches.
Tampa Bay have scored a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 4 home matches.
Tampa Bay have scored 36% of their goals after the 75th minute.

View comments for all teams















Tables overview

Points

GP pts
Tampa Bay 26 52
El Paso 26 47
Charleston 26 46
Detroit City 26 44
Sacramento R. 26 43
New Mexico 26 43
FC Tulsa 26 41
Lexington 26 40
Colorado S. 26 39
Hartford A. 26 39
Orange County 26 39
San Antonio 26 38
Pittsburgh 27 38
Louisville C. 26 37
Rhode Island 25 35
Indy Eleven 26 33
Oakland Roots 26 33
Phoenix Risi. 26 33
Las Vegas L. 26 33
Miami FC 27 33
Birmingham L. 25 23
Loudoun Utd 25 23
Monterey Bay 26 18
Brooklyn FC 26 18
Sporting JAX 27 14

Form (last 8)

GP pts
El Paso 8 22
Hartford A. 8 18
Charleston 8 16
Sacramento R. 8 16
Tampa Bay 8 14
Colorado S. 8 14
Detroit City 8 13
Lexington 8 12
FC Tulsa 8 12
Oakland Roots 8 12
Pittsburgh 8 11
Miami FC 8 11
Phoenix Risi. 8 11
Louisville C. 8 10
Rhode Island 8 10
Las Vegas L. 8 10
New Mexico 8 9
Indy Eleven 8 8
San Antonio 8 7
Birmingham L. 8 6
Sporting JAX 8 6
Loudoun Utd 8 5
Brooklyn FC 8 5
Orange County 8 5
Monterey Bay 8 3

Home

GP pts
Charleston 13 32
Detroit City 13 28
Sacramento R. 13 27
Indy Eleven 14 27
Tampa Bay 12 26
Lexington 13 25
Colorado S. 13 24
FC Tulsa 13 24
New Mexico 13 24
Rhode Island 13 23
Pittsburgh 13 23
Phoenix Risi. 13 22
Hartford A. 12 21
El Paso 12 21
Louisville C. 13 21
San Antonio 13 20
Miami FC 13 19
Orange County 13 18
Las Vegas L. 13 17
Oakland Roots 14 17
Birmingham L. 14 16
Monterey Bay 13 15
Brooklyn FC 13 12
Loudoun Utd 13 11
Sporting JAX 13 9

Away

GP pts
El Paso 14 26
Tampa Bay 14 26
Orange County 13 21
New Mexico 13 19
Hartford A. 14 18
San Antonio 13 18
FC Tulsa 13 17
Detroit City 13 16
Sacramento R. 13 16
Louisville C. 13 16
Oakland Roots 12 16
Las Vegas L. 13 16
Lexington 13 15
Pittsburgh 14 15
Colorado S. 13 15
Charleston 13 14
Miami FC 14 14
Rhode Island 12 12
Loudoun Utd 12 12
Phoenix Risi. 13 11
Birmingham L. 11 7
Indy Eleven 12 6
Brooklyn FC 13 6
Sporting JAX 14 5
Monterey Bay 13 3

Offence

GP GF
Charleston 26 52
Lexington 26 46
El Paso 26 45
Tampa Bay 26 45
Louisville C. 26 43
Colorado S. 26 40
New Mexico 26 39
Birmingham L. 25 36
Miami FC 27 36
Rhode Island 25 36
Sacramento R. 26 36
Orange County 26 35
Phoenix Risi. 26 35
Las Vegas L. 26 34
Oakland Roots 26 33
Detroit City 26 32
Indy Eleven 26 32
Sporting JAX 27 32
FC Tulsa 26 31
Loudoun Utd 25 31
Hartford A. 26 29
San Antonio 26 29
Pittsburgh 27 28
Monterey Bay 26 27
Brooklyn FC 26 26

Defence

GP GA
Detroit City 26 20
Tampa Bay 26 23
Sacramento R. 26 24
FC Tulsa 26 24
Hartford A. 26 26
Pittsburgh 27 27
San Antonio 26 28
Rhode Island 25 28
New Mexico 26 31
Charleston 26 31
Lexington 26 32
Indy Eleven 26 32
El Paso 26 32
Oakland Roots 26 35
Colorado S. 26 37
Phoenix Risi. 26 38
Las Vegas L. 26 38
Orange County 26 40
Louisville C. 26 42
Birmingham L. 25 42
Loudoun Utd 25 43
Miami FC 27 44
Monterey Bay 26 46
Brooklyn FC 26 52
Sporting JAX 27 73

Offence (last 8)

GP GF
Birmingham L. 8 18
Lexington 8 18
El Paso 8 17
Hartford A. 8 16
Charleston 8 15
New Mexico 8 13
Colorado S. 8 12
Miami FC 8 12
Sacramento R. 8 12
Tampa Bay 8 12
FC Tulsa 8 11
Indy Eleven 8 11
Louisville C. 8 11
Phoenix Risi. 8 11
Loudoun Utd 8 10
Las Vegas L. 8 9
Rhode Island 8 9
Sporting JAX 8 9
Brooklyn FC 8 8
Monterey Bay 8 8
Oakland Roots 8 8
Pittsburgh 8 8
Detroit City 8 6
Orange County 8 6
San Antonio 8 4

Defence (last 8)

GP GA
Detroit City 8 3
Tampa Bay 8 4
El Paso 8 5
Pittsburgh 8 7
Oakland Roots 8 7
FC Tulsa 8 7
Charleston 8 7
San Antonio 8 8
Sacramento R. 8 8
Rhode Island 8 9
Hartford A. 8 9
Lexington 8 10
Louisville C. 8 11
Las Vegas L. 8 11
Indy Eleven 8 11
Colorado S. 8 11
Phoenix Risi. 8 13
Miami FC 8 13
New Mexico 8 14
Loudoun Utd 8 14
Monterey Bay 8 16
Brooklyn FC 8 18
Orange County 8 21
Birmingham L. 8 21
Sporting JAX 8 22

Offence (home)

GP GF
Charleston 13 36
Tampa Bay 12 28
Lexington 13 25
Miami FC 13 24
Colorado S. 13 23
Indy Eleven 14 23
Phoenix Risi. 13 23
Sacramento R. 13 23
El Paso 12 21
New Mexico 13 21
Rhode Island 13 21
Birmingham L. 14 20
Sporting JAX 13 20
Loudoun Utd 13 19
Hartford A. 12 18
Louisville C. 13 18
Monterey Bay 13 17
Oakland Roots 14 17
Detroit City 13 15
Pittsburgh 13 15
Brooklyn FC 13 14
Las Vegas L. 13 14
Orange County 13 14
San Antonio 13 14
FC Tulsa 13 13

Defence (home)

GP GA
Detroit City 13 5
FC Tulsa 13 7
Charleston 13 9
Pittsburgh 13 10
Sacramento R. 13 11
Rhode Island 13 11
San Antonio 13 12
Lexington 13 13
Indy Eleven 14 13
Tampa Bay 12 14
Las Vegas L. 13 14
Hartford A. 12 15
Colorado S. 13 15
New Mexico 13 16
Louisville C. 13 16
Brooklyn FC 13 16
Phoenix Risi. 13 18
Orange County 13 18
Oakland Roots 14 18
Birmingham L. 14 18
El Paso 12 19
Monterey Bay 13 20
Miami FC 13 23
Loudoun Utd 13 23
Sporting JAX 13 38

Offence (away)

GP GF
Louisville C. 13 25
El Paso 14 24
Lexington 13 21
Orange County 13 21
Las Vegas L. 13 20
FC Tulsa 13 18
New Mexico 13 18
Colorado S. 13 17
Detroit City 13 17
Tampa Bay 14 17
Birmingham L. 11 16
Charleston 13 16
Oakland Roots 12 16
Rhode Island 12 15
San Antonio 13 15
Pittsburgh 14 13
Sacramento R. 13 13
Brooklyn FC 13 12
Loudoun Utd 12 12
Miami FC 14 12
Phoenix Risi. 13 12
Sporting JAX 14 12
Hartford A. 14 11
Monterey Bay 13 10
Indy Eleven 12 9

Defence (away)

GP GA
Tampa Bay 14 9
Hartford A. 14 11
Sacramento R. 13 13
El Paso 14 13
New Mexico 13 15
Detroit City 13 15
San Antonio 13 16
Rhode Island 12 17
Pittsburgh 14 17
Oakland Roots 12 17
FC Tulsa 13 17
Lexington 13 19
Indy Eleven 12 19
Phoenix Risi. 13 20
Loudoun Utd 12 20
Miami FC 14 21
Orange County 13 22
Colorado S. 13 22
Charleston 13 22
Las Vegas L. 13 24
Birmingham L. 11 24
Monterey Bay 13 26
Louisville C. 13 26
Sporting JAX 14 35
Brooklyn FC 13 36






Total Match Goals stats


Match total goals stats

Teams GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Sporting JAX  27 3.89 100% 85% 74% 56% 41% 15% 63% 0% 37% 0% 37%
Louisville City  26 3.27 96% 85% 58% 35% 23% 15% 69% 19% 15% 15% 12%
Charleston  26 3.19 100% 85% 58% 42% 23% 8% 46% 35% 19% 35% 19%
Birmingham L.  25 3.12 92% 80% 60% 48% 20% 4% 68% 20% 20% 12% 12%
Brooklyn FC  26 3.00 100% 81% 62% 42% 15% 0% 46% 12% 42% 12% 42%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats


Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)

Last 8 matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Birmingham L.  8 4.88 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 12% 75% 12% 12% 12% 12%
Sporting JAX  8 3.88 100% 88% 75% 62% 62% 0% 62% 0% 38% 0% 38%
Lexington  8 3.50 100% 75% 62% 50% 50% 12% 50% 25% 25% 25% 25%
New Mexico  8 3.38 88% 75% 75% 38% 25% 12% 75% 12% 25% 0% 12%
Orange County  8 3.38 100% 88% 50% 38% 38% 25% 50% 12% 38% 12% 38%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)


Match total goals stats (at home)

Teams (at home) GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Sporting JAX  13 4.46 100% 85% 85% 62% 46% 31% 69% 0% 31% 0% 31%
Miami FC  13 3.62 92% 85% 69% 54% 38% 15% 69% 15% 23% 8% 15%
Tampa Bay  12 3.50 100% 83% 67% 50% 17% 8% 42% 50% 8% 50% 8%
Charleston  13 3.46 100% 92% 62% 46% 38% 8% 54% 46% 0% 46% 0%
El Paso  12 3.33 100% 83% 58% 50% 42% 0% 75% 25% 0% 25% 0%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats (at home)


Match total goals stats (away)

Teams (away) GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Louisville City  13 3.92 100% 92% 69% 46% 31% 23% 85% 15% 0% 15% 0%
Brooklyn FC  13 3.69 100% 100% 85% 62% 23% 0% 46% 8% 46% 8% 46%
Birmingham L.  11 3.64 100% 100% 73% 64% 27% 0% 82% 0% 18% 0% 18%
Las Vegas L.  13 3.38 100% 85% 62% 46% 38% 8% 69% 23% 8% 23% 8%
Sporting JAX  14 3.36 100% 86% 64% 50% 36% 0% 57% 0% 43% 0% 43%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats (away)

Example
0.5+: matches where the total number of goals (team goals + opponent goals) was over 0.5





Segments Table

0 pt Segments table progression arrow 52 pts
5th Segment 4th Segment 3rd Segment 2nd Segment 1st Segment
up to 10.0 pts from 10.1 to 20.5 pts from 20.6 to 31.0 pts from 31.1 to 41.5 pts from 41.6 to 52 pts
(26)  18  Monterey Bay
(26)  18  Brooklyn FC
(27)  14  Sporting JAX
(25)  23  Birmingham L.
(25)  23  Loudoun Utd
(26)  41  FC Tulsa
(26)  40  Lexington
(26)  39  Colorado S.
(26)  39  Hartford A.
(26)  39  Orange County
(26)  38  San Antonio
(27)  38  Pittsburgh
(26)  37  Louisville City
(25)  35  Rhode Island
(26)  33  Indy Eleven
(26)  33  Oakland Roots
(26)  33  Phoenix Rising
(26)  33  Las Vegas L.
(27)  33  Miami FC
(26)  52  Tampa Bay
(26)  47  El Paso
(26)  46  Charleston
(26)  44  Detroit City
(26)  43  Sacramento R.
(26)  43  New Mexico

The Segments Table is a visual representation splitting the teams into 5 segments. Each team is assigned to a specific segment, depending on the team's number of points. Each of the 5 segments spans one-fifth (20%) of the total points held by the team ranked 1st in the league. For each team, the number of matches played appears in green between brackets, and the number of points is displayed in black.








Sat 3 Oct
LOU - IND
Sun 4 Oct
BRO - RHO
Sun 4 Oct
DET - BIR
Sun 4 Oct
LEX - ELP
Sun 4 Oct
TPB - MIA
Sun 4 Oct
TUL - SAC
Sun 4 Oct
COL - OAK
Sun 4 Oct
ORA - MON
Sun 4 Oct
VEG - SAN
Sun 4 Oct
NMX - PHO




League statistics

325 matches played / 375
86.7% completed
Home wins:  44%
Over 1.5 goals:  72%
Draws:  29%
Over 2.5 goals:  50%
Away wins:  27%
Over 3.5 goals:  32%
Goals:  888 Home goals per match:  1.53
Goals per match:  2.73 Away goals per match:  1.21
    Both teams scored:  54%

Results

 Latest results
 Matches by date
 Matches by Matchweek
 Results grid
 Results filter
 Outcome Surprise-Levels

Tables

 Home / Away tables
 Wide table
 Tables by Date
 Form tables
 Projected points

Analysis

 Goals statistics
 Points performance
 Over / Under
 Scored / Conceded
 Home advantage
 Relative form
 Run-in analysis

Goal times

 When goals were scored
 1st-half / 2nd-half
 First team to score
 Goal types
 Lead durations
 Points Won/Lost
Home team scored first: 53% No goal scored: 9% Away team scored first: 38%
Average minute when home team scored first: 32 min. Average minute when away team scored first: 32 min.
Home team lead-defending rate: 61% Away team lead-defending rate: 51%
Home team equalizing rate: 49% Away team equalizing rate: 39%
Home team lead duration: 28% Teams level in goals: 52% Away team lead duration: 20%
Home PPG when home team scored first: 2.35 Away PPG when away team scored first: 2.08

More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 325 matches played in the league, a total of 888 goals have been scored (2.73 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including the league results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded.

 

SoccerSTATS.com - Public edition

SoccerSTATS.com provides football statistics, results and blog articles on national and international soccer competitions worldwide. Football fans can keep a tab on stats related to their favourite team or leagues of interest, and access a wide range of team performance data analytics and league standings, not only on the world's most famous professional leagues, but also on amateur and regional leagues over the world. Example of soccer statistics include league standings, form tables, top goal scorers, scoring stats, statistical previews and goal timing statistics.
Follow us on Twitter
F.A.Q. Contact Privacy Policy Do Not Sell My Information
Terms & conditions of use About us Cookie usage and options Membership information
Mobile app
To our loyal users: PLEASE SUPPORT US

Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. Products, services, promotional offers and other offerings from partners and advertisers are subject to terms and conditions. By using this website you certify that you agree with the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy and that you are over the age of 18 or that you have the permission of a parent or guardian to use this website, after your parent or guardian has carefully reviewed and agreed to the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy. The website's content is provided for informational purposes only is not to be relied upon as a professional opinion whatsover. Nothing on this website should be considered as advice. This website is not associated with nor endorsed by any league or competition (whether professional, collegiate or other types of leagues / competitions), federation, association, club or team. All trademarks, brands, images, logos and names appearing on this website belong to their respective owners.
Useful links (third-party websites):   www.gamcare.org.uk       www.begambleaware.org        gamblingtherapy.org
 
   
Copyright 1998-2026 SoccerSTATS.com
back to top