back to top
LEAGUES MATCHES STATS FAV BLOG MEMBER LOGIN
usa2
USA - USL Championship
LATEST MATCHES FORM H2H GOALS HALF-TIME TIMING FIRST GOAL FAVOURITE
🔍

Charleston vs Birmingham L.

advertisement


Visual table

  GP Pts
1  Tampa Bay 26 52
2  El Paso 26 47
3  Charleston 26 46
4  Detroit City 26 44
5  New Mexico 26 43
6  FC Tulsa 26 41
7  Lexington 26 40
8  Sacramento R. 25 40
9  Colorado S. 26 39
10  Hartford A. 26 39
11  Orange County 26 39
12  San Antonio 26 38
13  Pittsburgh 27 38
14  Louisville City 26 37
15  Rhode Island 25 35
16  Indy Eleven 26 33
17  Oakland Roots 26 33
18  Phoenix Rising 26 33
19  Las Vegas L. 25 33
20  Miami FC 27 33
21  Birmingham L. 25 23
22  Loudoun Utd 25 23
23  Monterey Bay 26 18
24  Brooklyn FC 26 18
25  Sporting JAX 27 14

 
Sun 22 Mar 2026
Charleston3 2Birmingham L.
0:1 Romario Williams (25)
0:2 S. Shashoua (27)
Colton Swan (58) 1:2
Emilio Ycaza pen. (80) 2:2
Emilio Ycaza (90) 3:2






Seasonal streaks


2nd consecutive win for Charleston.
2nd consecutive home win for Charleston.
2nd consecutive game where Charleston scored.
2nd consecutive home game where Charleston scored.
2nd consecutive game where Charleston conceded.
2nd consecutive home game where Charleston conceded.
 

 
Lead durations in 90 minutes of regular time
090
CharlestonLevel (35)Birmingham L. (55)
Lead durations tables
  How are the duration values calculated?⌄

To calculate the above duration values based on a total of 90 minutes, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are considered scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are considered scored on the 90th minute.






 






 flag

Charleston

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 13 10 2 1  
  Away 13 4 2 7  
  Total 26 14 4 8  
PPG (Home): 2.46
PPG (Away): 1.08
PPG (Total): 1.77


Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game1.77 2.00 +13.0%
AVG Goals For2.00 1.88 -6.0%
AVG Goals Against1.19 0.88 -26.1%



Charleston's progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
7 Mar Charleston 2:1

1-0   S. Suber (45)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Wilmer Cabrera (52)

     2-1   Nathan Messer (o.g.) (62)
Pittsburgh + - - 1-0
21 Mar Charleston 3:2

     0-1   Romario Williams (25)

     0-2   S. Shashoua (27)

---------------------------------------
1-2   Colton Swan (58)

2-2   Emilio Ycaza (80) pen.

3-2   Emilio Ycaza (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 0-2
28 Mar Detroit City 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Darren Smith (75)
Charleston - - + 0-0
4 Apr Louisville City 0:2

     0-1   L. Kissiedou (20)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Kirill Pakhomov (65)
Charleston - + - 0-1
11 Apr Brooklyn FC 3:0

1-0   Jaden Servania (8)

2-0   Stefan Stojanovic (31)

---------------------------------------
3-0   Markus Anderson (60)
Charleston + - + 2-0
18 Apr Charleston 1:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   S. Cruz (80)

1-1   Douglas Martínez (82)
Tampa Bay - - - 0-0
22 Apr Rhode Island 4:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Jerome Williams (51)

2-0   Jojea Kwizera (61)

3-0   Jerome Williams (66)

4-0   Dwayne Atkinson (83) pen.
Charleston + - + 0-0
2 May Charleston 4:0

1-0   Colton Swan (28)

2-0   Maalique Foster (32)

3-0   Kirill Pakhomov (42)

---------------------------------------
4-0   Colton Swan (64)
Sporting JAX + + - 3-0
24 May New Mexico 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   K. Keller (81)
Charleston - - + 0-0
30 May Charleston 2:0

1-0   Colton Swan (14)

2-0   Langston Blackstock (16)

Detroit City - + - 2-0
11 Jun Tampa Bay 2:2

1-0   Louis Pérez (30)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Maalique Foster (55)

     1-2   Colton Swan (80)

2-2   Mattheus (90)
Charleston + - - 1-0
13 Jun Charleston 5:1

     0-1   Remi Cabral (15)

1-1   Colton Swan (16)

2-1   Maalique Foster (18)

3-1   Emilio Ycaza (45)

---------------------------------------
4-1   Andy Cabrera (80)

5-1   Chris Allan (90)
FC Tulsa + - - 3-1
21 Jun Sporting JAX 2:5

     0-1   Maalique Foster (12)

     0-2   Jeremy Kelly (14)

     0-3   Miguel Berry (19)

1-3   Wan Kuzain (44)

---------------------------------------
2-3   Wan Kuzain (47)

     2-4   Miguel Berry (53)

     2-5   Alec Hughes (82)
Charleston + - - 1-3
24 Jun Charleston 4:1

1-0   Maalique Foster (14)

2-0   Colton Swan (41)

---------------------------------------
3-0   Emilio Ycaza (51) pen.

     3-1   Luca Piras (81)

4-1   Jeremy Kelly (86)
Loudoun Utd + - - 2-0
4 Jul Indy Eleven 2:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Josh OBrien (82)

2-0   Bruno Rendón (90)
Charleston - - + 0-0
18 Jul Charleston 1:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   F. Ajago (48)

1-1   Emilio Ycaza (73) pen.
Sacramento R. - - - 0-0
26 Jul Colorado S. 2:1

---------------------------------------
1-0   Adrien Perez (56)

     1-1   Andy Cabrera (81)

2-1   Jonas Fjellberg (90)
Charleston + - - 0-0
1 Aug Charleston 5:0

1-0   Wilmer Cabrera (2)

2-0   Maalique Foster (44)

---------------------------------------
3-0   L. Kissiedou (54)

4-0   Miguel Berry (57)

5-0   Emilio Ycaza (90)
Brooklyn FC + + - 2-0
8 Aug Loudoun Utd 0:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Langston Blackstock (64)
Charleston - + - 0-0
15 Aug Pittsburgh 3:1

1-0   T. Amann (2)

2-0   D. Griffin (16)

     2-1   Douglas Martínez (18)

---------------------------------------
3-1   V. Souza (61)
Charleston + - - 2-1
24 Aug Charleston 5:0

1-0   Maalique Foster (19)

2-0   Miguel Berry (45)

---------------------------------------
3-0   Miguel Berry (47)

4-0   Graham Smith (62)

5-0   Alec Hughes (86)
Miami FC + + - 2-0
30 Aug Las Vegas L. 0:2

     0-1   Maalique Foster (40)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Maalique Foster (59)
Charleston - + - 0-1
2 Sep Charleston 1:2

1-0   Kirill Pakhomov (29)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Michee Ngalina (75) pen.

     1-2   Barry Coffey (90)
Hartford A. + - - 1-0
12 Sep Birmingham L. 2:2

1-0   Sebastian Tregarthen (11)

     1-1   Miguel Berry (14)

     1-2   Miguel Berry (21)

2-2   Romario Williams (39)

Charleston + - - 2-2
19 Sep Charleston 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Camilo Sánchez (78)
Monterey Bay - + - 0-0
26 Sep Charleston 2:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Emilio Ycaza (77) pen.

2-0   Emilio Ycaza (84)
Rhode Island - + - 0-0



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
10 Oct Charleston vs Louisville City 2.46 1.23
14 Oct Hartford A. vs Charleston 1.75 1.08
17 Oct Miami FC vs Charleston 1.46 1.08
24 Oct Charleston vs Indy Eleven 2.46 0.50
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.24

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins 2-2
Consecutive draws -1-
Consecutive defeats ---
No win -1-
No draw 5-2
No defeat 223
1 goal scored or more 13511
1 goal conceded or more -1-
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded 2-2
GF+GA over 2.5 -1-
GF+GA under 2.5 2-2
Scored at least twice 121










Comparison with league average


Charleston (26 matches) vs league average

(overall)Charleston League AVG
Points per game  1.77 1.36
% Wins  54% 36%
% Draws  15% 29%
% Defeats  31% 36%
Goals scored per game  2.00 1.36
Goals conceded per game  1.19 1.36
% Clean sheets  35% 28%
% Failed To Score  19% 28%
% Won To Nil  35% 19%
% Lost To Nil  19% 19%
% Team scored first  50% 45%
% Opponent scored first  50% 45%
Average minute scored first  34 32
Average minute conceded first  43 32
Lead-defending rate  82% 57%
Equalizing rate  47% 43%
% Time leading  35% 24%
% Time level in goals  49% 52%
% Time trailing  16% 24%
PPG when scored first  2.77 2.24
PPG when conceded first  0.77 0.54
Total goals per game  3.19 2.73
% over 1.5 goals  85% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  58% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  42% 32%
% both teams scored  46% 54%

Charleston at home (13 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Charleston League AVG
Points per game  2.46 1.60
% Wins  77% 44%
% Draws  15% 29%
% Defeats  8% 27%
Goals scored per game  2.77 1.52
Goals conceded per game  0.69 1.20
% Clean sheets  46% 32%
% Failed To Score  0% 23%
% Won To Nil  46% 23%
% Lost To Nil  0% 14%
% Team scored first  69% 53%
% Opponent scored first  31% 37%
Average minute scored first  34 32
Average minute conceded first  42 32
Lead-defending rate  91% 61%
Equalizing rate  80% 49%
% Time leading  48% 29%
% Time level in goals  45% 52%
% Time trailing  7% 20%
PPG when scored first  2.67 2.35
PPG when conceded first  2.00 0.69
Total goals per game  3.46 2.73
% over 1.5 goals  92% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  62% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  46% 32%
% both teams scored  54% 54%

Charleston away (13 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Charleston League AVG
Points per game  1.08 1.11
% Wins  31% 27%
% Draws  15% 29%
% Defeats  54% 44%
Goals scored per game  1.23 1.20
Goals conceded per game  1.69 1.52
% Clean sheets  23% 23%
% Failed To Score  38% 32%
% Won To Nil  23% 14%
% Lost To Nil  38% 23%
% Team scored first  31% 37%
% Opponent scored first  69% 53%
Average minute scored first  34 32
Average minute conceded first  44 32
Lead-defending rate  67% 51%
Equalizing rate  30% 39%
% Time leading  22% 20%
% Time level in goals  53% 52%
% Time trailing  25% 29%
PPG when scored first  3.00 2.10
PPG when conceded first  0.22 0.44
Total goals per game  2.92 2.73
% over 1.5 goals  77% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  54% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  38% 32%
% both teams scored  38% 54%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Charleston
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 13 / 26 50%
  Opponent scored first 13 / 26 50%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 11 / 26 42%
  Opponent was leading at HT 4 / 26 15%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 31.3 min. 35%
  Average minutes level in goals 44.2 min. 49%
  Average minutes trailing 14.5 min. 16%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Charleston have been in the lead for an average duration of 31.3 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 14.5 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Charleston
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 26

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 17
  Equalizer goals conceded 3
  Lead defending rate * (1) 82%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 15
  Equalizer goals scored 7
  Equalizing rate * (2) 47%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 28
  Non-crucial goals conceded 13

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Charleston have taken the lead 17 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 82% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 18%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 15 times that Charleston's opponents have taken the lead, Charleston have managed to score an equalizer on 7 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 47%.


 flag Charleston
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 9 / 13 69%
  Opponent scored first 4 / 13 31%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 8 / 13 62%
  Opponent was leading at HT 1 / 13 8%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 43.2 min. 48%
  Average minutes level in goals 40.5 min. 45%
  Average minutes trailing 6.4 min. 7%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Charleston have been in the lead for an average duration of 43.2 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 6.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Charleston
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 13

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 11
  Equalizer goals conceded 1
  Lead defending rate * (1) 91%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 5
  Equalizer goals scored 4
  Equalizing rate * (2) 80%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 21
  Non-crucial goals conceded 3

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Charleston have taken the lead 11 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 91% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 9%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 5 times that Charleston's opponents have taken the lead when Charleston were playing at home, Charleston have managed to score an equalizer on 4 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 80%.



 flag Charleston
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 4 / 13 31%
  Opponent scored first 9 / 13 69%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 3 / 13 23%
  Opponent was leading at HT 3 / 13 23%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 19.4 min. 22%
  Average minutes level in goals 48.0 min. 53%
  Average minutes trailing 22.6 min. 25%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Charleston have been in the lead for an average duration of 19.4 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 22.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Charleston
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 13

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 6
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 67%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 10
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 30%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 7
  Non-crucial goals conceded 10

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Charleston have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 67% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 33%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 10 times that Charleston's opponents have taken the lead when Charleston were playing away, Charleston have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 30%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Tampa Bay 26 52 1:1 2:2 h2h
2 El Paso 26 47     h2h
3 Charleston 26 46
4 Detroit City 26 44 2:0 1:0 h2h
5 New Mexico 26 43   1:0 h2h
6 FC Tulsa 26 41 5:1   h2h
7 Lexington 26 40     h2h
8 Sacramento R. 25 40 1:1   h2h
9 Colorado S. 26 39   2:1 h2h
10 Hartford A. 26 39 1:2 14 Oct h2h
11 Orange County 26 39     h2h
12 San Antonio 26 38     h2h
13 Pittsburgh 27 38 2:1 3:1 h2h
14 Louisville City 26 37 10 Oct 0:2 h2h
15 Rhode Island 25 35 2:0 4:0 h2h
16 Indy Eleven 26 33 24 Oct 2:0 h2h
17 Oakland Roots 26 33     h2h
18 Phoenix Rising 26 33     h2h
19 Las Vegas L. 25 33   0:2 h2h
20 Miami FC 27 33 5:0 17 Oct h2h
21 Birmingham L. 25 23 3:2 2:2 h2h
22 Loudoun Utd 25 23 4:1 0:1 h2h
23 Monterey Bay 26 18 1:0   h2h
24 Brooklyn FC 26 18 5:0 3:0 h2h
25 Sporting JAX 27 14 4:0 2:5 h2h

Charleston stats rank the team in 3rd position in the the league table with 46 points, 1 point behind El Paso and 2 points above Detroit City.








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 36 1652
GF per match 2.771.23 2.00
Goals conceded (GA) 92231
GA per match 0.691.69 1.19
GF + GA per match 3.462.923.19
GF+GA over 0.5 100%100%100%
GF+GA over 1.5 92%77%85%
GF+GA over 2.5 62%54%58%
GF+GA over 3.5 46%38%42%
GF+GA over 4.5 38%8%23%
GF+GA over 5.5 8%8%8%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 69%54%62%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 54%31%42%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 15%23%19%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 46%23%35%
Won-to-nil 46%23%35%
Failed to score 0%38%19%
Lost-to-nil 0%38%19%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 100%62%81%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 62%38%50%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 85%46%65%
Scored in both halves 46%23%35%
Both teams scored 54%38%46%
Conceding Rate 54%77%65%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 15%38%27%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 38%69%54%
Conceded in both halves 0%31%15%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 100%62%81%
GF over 1.5 69%38%54%
GF over 2.5 46%8%27%
GF over 3.5 38%8%23%
GF over 4.5 23%8%15%
GA over 0.5 54%77%65%
GA over 1.5 15%62%38%
GA over 2.5 0%23%12%
GA over 3.5 0%8%4%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Charleston matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 0%0%0%
Match total goals = 1 8%23%15%
Match total goals = 2 31%23%27%
Match total goals = 3 15%15%15%
Match total goals = 4 8%31%19%
Match total goals = 5+ 38%8%23%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 8%23%15%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 46%38%42%
Match total goals = 4+ 46%38%42%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  32 14
Away wins  12 10
Home & Away wins  44 24
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  10 00
Away defeats  32 11
Home & Away defeats  42 11

A majority of Charleston's wins have been obtained with a margin of 2 goals or more (10 wins), while 4 of their wins had a one-goal margin. Charleston have conceded as many one-goal margin defeats as defeats with a margin of 2 goals or more (4 defeats for each).









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 70%
30%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)2.46
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)1.08
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 69%
31%
  % Goals conceded 29%
71%
  League average 56%
44%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 83 11  42%
Drawing at HT 47 11  42%
Losing at HT 13 4  15%
  Total 131326







Goal times


 flag Charleston
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 6
GA 4
16-30 GF 10
GA 4
31-45 GF 8
GA 3
46-60 GF 9
GA 5
61-75 GF 5
GA 6
76-90 GF 14
GA 9
1st Half GF 24
46%
GA 11
35%
2nd Half GF 28
54%
GA 20
65%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 50
 Avg. minute goals conceded 54


  Charleston
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 3
GA 1
16-30 GF 6
GA 2
31-45 GF 7
GA 0
46-60 GF 6
GA 1
61-75 GF 3
GA 2
76-90 GF 11
GA 3
1st Half GF 16
44%
GA 3
33%
2nd Half GF 20
56%
GA 6
67%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 53
  Avg. minute goals conceded 56


  Charleston
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 3
GA 3
16-30 GF 4
GA 2
31-45 GF 1
GA 3
46-60 GF 3
GA 4
61-75 GF 2
GA 4
76-90 GF 3
GA 6
1st Half GF 8
50%
GA 8
36%
2nd Half GF 8
50%
GA 14
64%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 44
  Avg. minute goals conceded 53








Charleston scores

FT at home
5-0 2 15%
1-1 2 15%
2-0 2 15%
5-1 1 8%
3-2 1 8%
1-2 1 8%
4-1 1 8%
2-1 1 8%
4-0 1 8%
1-0 1 8%
FT away
2-2 2 15%
0-2 2 15%
1-0 2 15%
2-5 1 8%
3-1 1 8%
2-1 1 8%
0-1 1 8%
4-0 1 8%
3-0 1 8%
2-0 1 8%

Half-time at home
2-0 4 31%
0-0 4 31%
1-0 2 15%
0-2 1 8%
3-1 1 8%
3-0 1 8%
Half-time away
0-0 6 46%
0-1 2 15%
1-3 1 8%
2-2 1 8%
2-1 1 8%
2-0 1 8%
1-0 1 8%





This season in the league

Charleston have won their last 2 matches.
Charleston have been undefeated in their last 3 matches.
Charleston have scored in each of their last 11 matches.
Charleston failed to keep a clean sheet in 7 of their 13 home matches.
Charleston have scored in each of their 13 home matches.
Charleston failed to keep a clean sheet in 10 of their 13 away matches.
Charleston have scored 69% of their goals at home.
71% of Charleston's conceded goals were conceded away.
Charleston have scored in each of their last 13 home matches.
Charleston have scored in each of their last 5 away matches.

View comments for all teams



 flag

Birmingham L.

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 14 3 7 4  
  Away 11 1 4 6  
  Total 25 4 11 10  
PPG (Home): 1.14
PPG (Away): 0.64
PPG (Total): 0.92


Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game0.92 0.75 -18.5%
AVG Goals For1.44 2.25 +56.3%
AVG Goals Against1.68 2.63 +56.5%



Birmingham L.'s progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
8 Mar Birmingham L. 0:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Marco Micaletto (57)
Tampa Bay - - + 0-0
11 Mar Birmingham L. 0:0

Hartford A. - + + 0-0
21 Mar Charleston 3:2

     0-1   Romario Williams (25)

     0-2   S. Shashoua (27)

---------------------------------------
1-2   Colton Swan (58)

2-2   Emilio Ycaza (80) pen.

3-2   Emilio Ycaza (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 0-2
4 Apr Loudoun Utd 2:2

     0-1   Tyler Pasher (16)

1-1   James Murphy (31)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   Tyler Pasher (54)

2-2   A. Ordóñez (79) pen.
Birmingham L. + - - 1-1
12 Apr Birmingham L. 1:0

1-0   Sebastian Tregarthen (25)

Pittsburgh - + - 1-0
19 Apr Birmingham L. 2:2

1-0   Tyler Pasher (39) pen.

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Edward Kizza (68)

     1-2   Josh OBrien (81)

2-2   Sam McIllhatton (89)
Indy Eleven + - - 1-0
2 May Rhode Island 1:3

     0-1   Sebastian Tregarthen (3)

1-1   Leo Afonso (17)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   Phanuel Kavita (48)

     1-3   Ronaldo Damus (57)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-1
8 May Birmingham L. 0:0

Miami FC - + + 0-0
24 May Monterey Bay 2:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Riley Bidois (60)

2-0   E. Blancas (78)
Birmingham L. - - + 0-0
4 Jun Birmingham L. 1:1

1-0   G. Diarbian (10)

     1-1   Babacar Niang (42)

Louisville City - - - 1-1
14 Jun Birmingham L. 1:2

     0-1   Oalex Anderson (15)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Johnny Rodriguez (60)

1-2   Sebastián Saucedo (89)
Las Vegas L. + - - 0-1
17 Jun Oakland Roots 1:1

     0-1   Peter-Lee Vassell (45)

---------------------------------------
1-1   P. Wilson (90)
Birmingham L. - - - 0-1
21 Jun Birmingham L. 1:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   Abdellatif Aboukoura (67)

1-1   Sebastian Tregarthen (89)
Loudoun Utd - - - 0-0
3 Jul Birmingham L. 1:2

     0-1   Rio Hope-Gund (2)

1-1   Tyler Pasher (24) pen.

---------------------------------------
     1-2   Ben Morris (90)
Detroit City + - - 1-1
5 Jul Miami FC 1:1

1-0   Arney Rocha (41)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Peter-Lee Vassell (78)
Birmingham L. - - - 1-0
29 Jul Louisville City 2:1

1-0   Kevon Lambert (6)

     1-1   S. Shashoua (42)

---------------------------------------
2-1   Kevon Lambert (74)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-1
2 Aug Birmingham L. 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Ronaldo Damus (63)
Rhode Island - + - 0-0
16 Aug Colorado S. 3:2

     0-1   Nico Brown (24)

1-1   Garven Metusala (45)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   Serge Ngoma Jr. (86)

2-2   Adrien Perez (90)

3-2   Juan Tejada (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-1
23 Aug Birmingham L. 2:3

---------------------------------------
1-0   Ronaldo Damus (55)

     1-1   Emil Jaaskelainen (58)

     1-2   Wan Kuzain (76)

2-2   Romario Williams (90)

     2-3   Danny Wilson (90)
Sporting JAX + - - 0-0
29 Aug Hartford A. 3:2

     0-1   Romario Williams (21)

     0-2   Romario Williams (39)

1-2   Barry Coffey (42)

2-2   Michee Ngalina (45)

---------------------------------------
3-2   Jordan Scarlett (74)
Birmingham L. + - - 2-2
5 Sep Indy Eleven 2:2

1-0   Joe Hafferty (20)

     1-1   Tyler Pasher (40)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   Romario Williams (66)

2-2   Dylan Sing (90)
Birmingham L. + - - 1-1
12 Sep Birmingham L. 2:2

1-0   Sebastian Tregarthen (11)

     1-1   Miguel Berry (14)

     1-2   Miguel Berry (21)

2-2   Romario Williams (39)

Charleston + - - 2-2
17 Sep Birmingham L. 4:4

1-0   Romario Williams (11)

     1-1   Zico Bailey (16)

     1-2   Niall Reid-Stephen (19)

---------------------------------------
     1-3   Greg Hurst (64)

     1-4   Joseph Melto Quiah (66)

2-4   Ronaldo Damus (77)

3-4   G. Diarbian (87)

4-4   Ronaldo Damus (90)
New Mexico + - - 1-2
19 Sep Tampa Bay 4:0

1-0   A J Paterson (o.g.) (30)

2-0   Matt Myers (39)

---------------------------------------
3-0   Matt Myers (56)

4-0   Matt Myers (60)
Birmingham L. + - + 2-0
23 Sep Birmingham L. 4:0

1-0   Peter-Lee Vassell (o.g.) (14)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Serge Ngoma Jr. (48)

3-0   Sebastián Saucedo (84) pen.

4-0   Ronaldo Damus (90)
Brooklyn FC + + - 1-0



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
3 Oct Detroit City vs Birmingham L. 2.15 0.64
10 Oct Sporting JAX vs Birmingham L. 0.69 0.64
18 Oct Birmingham L. vs Loudoun Utd 1.14 1.00
21 Oct Brooklyn FC (pp.) Birmingham L. 0.92 0.64
24 Oct Pittsburgh vs Birmingham L. 1.77 0.64
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.31

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins 1-1
Consecutive draws ---
Consecutive defeats -1-
No win -8-
No draw 112
No defeat 3-1
1 goal scored or more 9-1
1 goal conceded or more -11-
No goal scored -1-
No goal conceded 1-1
GF+GA over 2.5 458
GF+GA under 2.5 ---
Scored at least twice 4-1










Comparison with league average


Birmingham L. (25 matches) vs league average

(overall)Birmingham L. League AVG
Points per game  0.92 1.36
% Wins  16% 36%
% Draws  44% 29%
% Defeats  40% 36%
Goals scored per game  1.44 1.36
Goals conceded per game  1.68 1.36
% Clean sheets  20% 28%
% Failed To Score  20% 28%
% Won To Nil  12% 19%
% Lost To Nil  12% 19%
% Team scored first  56% 45%
% Opponent scored first  36% 45%
Average minute scored first  26 32
Average minute conceded first  33 32
Lead-defending rate  22% 57%
Equalizing rate  47% 43%
% Time leading  23% 24%
% Time level in goals  56% 52%
% Time trailing  21% 24%
PPG when scored first  1.29 2.24
PPG when conceded first  0.33 0.54
Total goals per game  3.12 2.73
% over 1.5 goals  80% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  60% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  48% 32%
% both teams scored  68% 54%

Birmingham L. at home (14 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Birmingham L. League AVG
Points per game  1.14 1.60
% Wins  21% 44%
% Draws  50% 29%
% Defeats  29% 27%
Goals scored per game  1.43 1.52
Goals conceded per game  1.29 1.20
% Clean sheets  36% 32%
% Failed To Score  21% 23%
% Won To Nil  21% 23%
% Lost To Nil  7% 14%
% Team scored first  57% 53%
% Opponent scored first  29% 37%
Average minute scored first  28 32
Average minute conceded first  35 32
Lead-defending rate  38% 61%
Equalizing rate  60% 49%
% Time leading  19% 29%
% Time level in goals  60% 52%
% Time trailing  21% 20%
PPG when scored first  1.63 2.35
PPG when conceded first  0.25 0.69
Total goals per game  2.71 2.73
% over 1.5 goals  64% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  50% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  36% 32%
% both teams scored  57% 54%

Birmingham L. away (11 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Birmingham L. League AVG
Points per game  0.64 1.11
% Wins  9% 27%
% Draws  36% 29%
% Defeats  55% 44%
Goals scored per game  1.45 1.20
Goals conceded per game  2.18 1.52
% Clean sheets  0% 23%
% Failed To Score  18% 32%
% Won To Nil  0% 14%
% Lost To Nil  18% 23%
% Team scored first  55% 37%
% Opponent scored first  45% 53%
Average minute scored first  22 32
Average minute conceded first  31 32
Lead-defending rate  10% 51%
Equalizing rate  33% 39%
% Time leading  27% 20%
% Time level in goals  51% 52%
% Time trailing  22% 29%
PPG when scored first  0.83 2.10
PPG when conceded first  0.40 0.44
Total goals per game  3.64 2.73
% over 1.5 goals  100% 72%
% over 2.5 goals  73% 50%
% over 3.5 goals  64% 32%
% both teams scored  82% 54%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Birmingham L.
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 14 / 25 56%
  Opponent scored first 9 / 25 36%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 5 / 25 20%
  Opponent was leading at HT 4 / 25 16%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 20.4 min. 23%
  Average minutes level in goals 50.5 min. 56%
  Average minutes trailing 19.1 min. 21%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Birmingham L. have been in the lead for an average duration of 20.4 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 19.1 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 25

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 18
  Equalizer goals conceded 14
  Lead defending rate * (1) 22%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 19
  Equalizer goals scored 9
  Equalizing rate * (2) 47%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 9
  Non-crucial goals conceded 9

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Birmingham L. have taken the lead 18 times and have conceded an equalizer on 14 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 22% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 78%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 19 times that Birmingham L.'s opponents have taken the lead, Birmingham L. have managed to score an equalizer on 9 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 47%.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 8 / 14 57%
  Opponent scored first 4 / 14 29%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 3 / 14 21%
  Opponent was leading at HT 2 / 14 14%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 17.1 min. 19%
  Average minutes level in goals 54.1 min. 60%
  Average minutes trailing 18.8 min. 21%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Birmingham L. have been in the lead for an average duration of 17.1 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 18.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 14

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 8
  Equalizer goals conceded 5
  Lead defending rate * (1) 38%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 10
  Equalizer goals scored 6
  Equalizing rate * (2) 60%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 6
  Non-crucial goals conceded 3

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Birmingham L. have taken the lead 8 times and have conceded an equalizer on 5 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 38% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 62%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 10 times that Birmingham L.'s opponents have taken the lead when Birmingham L. were playing at home, Birmingham L. have managed to score an equalizer on 6 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 60%.



 flag Birmingham L.
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 6 / 11 55%
  Opponent scored first 5 / 11 45%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 2 / 11 18%
  Opponent was leading at HT 2 / 11 18%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 24.5 min. 27%
  Average minutes level in goals 46.0 min. 51%
  Average minutes trailing 19.5 min. 22%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Birmingham L. have been in the lead for an average duration of 24.5 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 19.5 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Birmingham L.
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 11

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 10
  Equalizer goals conceded 9
  Lead defending rate * (1) 10%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 9
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 33%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 3
  Non-crucial goals conceded 6

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Birmingham L. have taken the lead 10 times and have conceded an equalizer on 9 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 10% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 90%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 9 times that Birmingham L.'s opponents have taken the lead when Birmingham L. were playing away, Birmingham L. have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 33%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Tampa Bay 26 52 0:1 4:0 h2h
2 El Paso 26 47     h2h
3 Charleston 26 46 2:2 3:2 h2h
4 Detroit City 26 44 1:2 3 Oct h2h
5 New Mexico 26 43 4:4   h2h
6 FC Tulsa 26 41     h2h
7 Lexington 26 40     h2h
8 Sacramento R. 25 40     h2h
9 Colorado S. 26 39   3:2 h2h
10 Hartford A. 26 39 0:0 3:2 h2h
11 Orange County 26 39     h2h
12 San Antonio 26 38     h2h
13 Pittsburgh 27 38 1:0 24 Oct h2h
14 Louisville City 26 37 1:1 2:1 h2h
15 Rhode Island 25 35 1:0 1:3 h2h
16 Indy Eleven 26 33 2:2 2:2 h2h
17 Oakland Roots 26 33   1:1 h2h
18 Phoenix Rising 26 33     h2h
19 Las Vegas L. 25 33 1:2   h2h
20 Miami FC 27 33 0:0 1:1 h2h
21 Birmingham L. 25 23
22 Loudoun Utd 25 23 18 Oct 2:2 h2h
23 Monterey Bay 26 18   2:0 h2h
24 Brooklyn FC 26 18 4:0 21 Oct h2h
25 Sporting JAX 27 14 2:3 10 Oct h2h








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 20 1636
GF per match 1.431.45 1.44
Goals conceded (GA) 182442
GA per match 1.292.18 1.68
GF + GA per match 2.713.643.12
GF+GA over 0.5 86%100%92%
GF+GA over 1.5 64%100%80%
GF+GA over 2.5 50%73%60%
GF+GA over 3.5 36%64%48%
GF+GA over 4.5 14%27%20%
GF+GA over 5.5 7%0%4%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 57%91%72%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 29%73%48%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 14%9%12%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 36%0%20%
Won-to-nil 21%0%12%
Failed to score 21%18%20%
Lost-to-nil 7%18%12%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 79%82%80%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 50%73%60%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 50%45%48%
Scored in both halves 21%36%28%
Both teams scored 57%82%68%
Conceding Rate 64%100%80%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 36%73%52%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 50%82%64%
Conceded in both halves 21%55%36%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 79%82%80%
GF over 1.5 36%55%44%
GF over 2.5 14%9%12%
GF over 3.5 14%0%8%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 64%100%80%
GA over 1.5 43%73%56%
GA over 2.5 14%36%24%
GA over 3.5 7%9%8%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Birmingham L. matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 14%0%8%
Match total goals = 1 21%0%12%
Match total goals = 2 14%27%20%
Match total goals = 3 14%9%12%
Match total goals = 4 21%36%28%
Match total goals = 5+ 14%27%20%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 36%0%20%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 29%36%32%
Match total goals = 4+ 36%64%48%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  20 01
Away wins  01 00
Home & Away wins  21 01
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  40 00
Away defeats  41 01
Home & Away defeats  81 01
Birmingham L. have obtained as many one-goal margin wins as wins with a margin of 2 goals or more (2 wins for each).

A majority of Birmingham L.'s defeats had a one-goal margin (8 defeats), while 2 of their defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 70%
30%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.14
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)0.64
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 56%
44%
  % Goals conceded 43%
57%
  League average 56%
44%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 32 5  20%
Drawing at HT 97 16  64%
Losing at HT 22 4  16%
  Total 141125







Goal times


 flag Birmingham L.
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 5
GA 4
16-30 GF 7
GA 6
31-45 GF 6
GA 7
46-60 GF 5
GA 7
61-75 GF 2
GA 6
76-90 GF 11
GA 12
1st Half GF 18
50%
GA 17
40%
2nd Half GF 18
50%
GA 25
60%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 50
 Avg. minute goals conceded 55


  Birmingham L.
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 4
GA 3
16-30 GF 2
GA 3
31-45 GF 2
GA 1
46-60 GF 2
GA 3
61-75 GF 1
GA 4
76-90 GF 9
GA 4
1st Half GF 8
40%
GA 7
39%
2nd Half GF 12
60%
GA 11
61%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 56
  Avg. minute goals conceded 50


  Birmingham L.
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 1
GA 1
16-30 GF 5
GA 3
31-45 GF 4
GA 6
46-60 GF 3
GA 4
61-75 GF 1
GA 2
76-90 GF 2
GA 8
1st Half GF 10
62%
GA 10
42%
2nd Half GF 6
38%
GA 14
58%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 42
  Avg. minute goals conceded 58








Birmingham L. scores

FT at home
2-2 2 14%
1-2 2 14%
1-1 2 14%
1-0 2 14%
0-0 2 14%
4-4 1 7%
2-3 1 7%
0-1 1 7%
4-0 1 7%
FT away
3-2 3 27%
2-2 2 18%
1-1 2 18%
1-3 1 9%
2-1 1 9%
4-0 1 9%
2-0 1 9%
The Birmingham L. score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 3-2 so far (3 times).
Half-time at home
0-0 6 43%
1-0 3 21%
1-1 2 14%
2-2 1 7%
1-2 1 7%
0-1 1 7%
Half-time away
1-1 5 45%
2-2 1 9%
0-2 1 9%
0-1 1 9%
2-0 1 9%
1-0 1 9%
0-0 1 9%





This season in the league

Birmingham L. failed to keep a clean sheet in 9 of their 14 home matches.
Birmingham L. failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their 11 away matches.
Birmingham L. have scored in 9 of their 11 away matches.
Birmingham L. have failed to win in their last 8 away matches.
Birmingham L. have scored in each of their last 9 home matches.
Birmingham L. failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 11 away matches.
Birmingham L. have scored a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 4 home matches.
Birmingham L. have conceded a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 5 away matches.

View comments for all teams















Tables overview

Points

GP pts
Tampa Bay 26 52
El Paso 26 47
Charleston 26 46
Detroit City 26 44
New Mexico 26 43
FC Tulsa 26 41
Lexington 26 40
Sacramento R. 25 40
Colorado S. 26 39
Hartford A. 26 39
Orange County 26 39
San Antonio 26 38
Pittsburgh 27 38
Louisville C. 26 37
Rhode Island 25 35
Indy Eleven 26 33
Oakland Roots 26 33
Phoenix Risi. 26 33
Las Vegas L. 25 33
Miami FC 27 33
Birmingham L. 25 23
Loudoun Utd 25 23
Monterey Bay 26 18
Brooklyn FC 26 18
Sporting JAX 27 14

Form (last 8)

GP pts
El Paso 8 22
Hartford A. 8 18
Charleston 8 16
Tampa Bay 8 14
Sacramento R. 8 14
Colorado S. 8 14
Detroit City 8 13
Lexington 8 12
FC Tulsa 8 12
Oakland Roots 8 12
Pittsburgh 8 11
Miami FC 8 11
Las Vegas L. 8 11
Phoenix Risi. 8 11
Louisville C. 8 10
Rhode Island 8 10
New Mexico 8 9
Indy Eleven 8 8
San Antonio 8 7
Birmingham L. 8 6
Sporting JAX 8 6
Loudoun Utd 8 5
Brooklyn FC 8 5
Orange County 8 5
Monterey Bay 8 3

Home

GP pts
Charleston 13 32
Detroit City 13 28
Indy Eleven 14 27
Tampa Bay 12 26
Lexington 13 25
Sacramento R. 12 24
Colorado S. 13 24
FC Tulsa 13 24
New Mexico 13 24
Rhode Island 13 23
Pittsburgh 13 23
Phoenix Risi. 13 22
Hartford A. 12 21
El Paso 12 21
Louisville C. 13 21
San Antonio 13 20
Miami FC 13 19
Orange County 13 18
Las Vegas L. 13 17
Oakland Roots 14 17
Birmingham L. 14 16
Monterey Bay 13 15
Brooklyn FC 13 12
Loudoun Utd 13 11
Sporting JAX 13 9

Away

GP pts
El Paso 14 26
Tampa Bay 14 26
Orange County 13 21
New Mexico 13 19
Hartford A. 14 18
San Antonio 13 18
FC Tulsa 13 17
Detroit City 13 16
Sacramento R. 13 16
Louisville C. 13 16
Oakland Roots 12 16
Las Vegas L. 12 16
Lexington 13 15
Pittsburgh 14 15
Colorado S. 13 15
Charleston 13 14
Miami FC 14 14
Rhode Island 12 12
Loudoun Utd 12 12
Phoenix Risi. 13 11
Birmingham L. 11 7
Indy Eleven 12 6
Brooklyn FC 13 6
Sporting JAX 14 5
Monterey Bay 13 3

Offence

GP GF
Charleston 26 52
Lexington 26 46
El Paso 26 45
Tampa Bay 26 45
Louisville C. 26 43
Colorado S. 26 40
New Mexico 26 39
Birmingham L. 25 36
Miami FC 27 36
Rhode Island 25 36
Orange County 26 35
Phoenix Risi. 26 35
Oakland Roots 26 33
Sacramento R. 25 33
Detroit City 26 32
Indy Eleven 26 32
Las Vegas L. 25 32
Sporting JAX 27 32
FC Tulsa 26 31
Loudoun Utd 25 31
Hartford A. 26 29
San Antonio 26 29
Pittsburgh 27 28
Monterey Bay 26 27
Brooklyn FC 26 26

Defence

GP GA
Detroit City 26 20
Sacramento R. 25 22
Tampa Bay 26 23
FC Tulsa 26 24
Hartford A. 26 26
Pittsburgh 27 27
San Antonio 26 28
Rhode Island 25 28
New Mexico 26 31
Charleston 26 31
Lexington 26 32
Indy Eleven 26 32
El Paso 26 32
Oakland Roots 26 35
Las Vegas L. 25 35
Colorado S. 26 37
Phoenix Risi. 26 38
Orange County 26 40
Louisville C. 26 42
Birmingham L. 25 42
Loudoun Utd 25 43
Miami FC 27 44
Monterey Bay 26 46
Brooklyn FC 26 52
Sporting JAX 27 73

Offence (last 8)

GP GF
Birmingham L. 8 18
Lexington 8 18
El Paso 8 17
Hartford A. 8 16
Charleston 8 15
New Mexico 8 13
Colorado S. 8 12
Miami FC 8 12
Tampa Bay 8 12
FC Tulsa 8 11
Indy Eleven 8 11
Louisville C. 8 11
Phoenix Risi. 8 11
Loudoun Utd 8 10
Rhode Island 8 9
Sacramento R. 8 9
Sporting JAX 8 9
Brooklyn FC 8 8
Monterey Bay 8 8
Oakland Roots 8 8
Pittsburgh 8 8
Las Vegas L. 8 7
Detroit City 8 6
Orange County 8 6
San Antonio 8 4

Defence (last 8)

GP GA
Detroit City 8 3
Tampa Bay 8 4
El Paso 8 5
Sacramento R. 8 6
Pittsburgh 8 7
Oakland Roots 8 7
FC Tulsa 8 7
Charleston 8 7
San Antonio 8 8
Las Vegas L. 8 8
Rhode Island 8 9
Hartford A. 8 9
Lexington 8 10
Louisville C. 8 11
Indy Eleven 8 11
Colorado S. 8 11
Phoenix Risi. 8 13
Miami FC 8 13
New Mexico 8 14
Loudoun Utd 8 14
Monterey Bay 8 16
Brooklyn FC 8 18
Orange County 8 21
Birmingham L. 8 21
Sporting JAX 8 22

Offence (home)

GP GF
Charleston 13 36
Tampa Bay 12 28
Lexington 13 25
Miami FC 13 24
Colorado S. 13 23
Indy Eleven 14 23
Phoenix Risi. 13 23
El Paso 12 21
New Mexico 13 21
Rhode Island 13 21
Birmingham L. 14 20
Sacramento R. 12 20
Sporting JAX 13 20
Loudoun Utd 13 19
Hartford A. 12 18
Louisville C. 13 18
Monterey Bay 13 17
Oakland Roots 14 17
Detroit City 13 15
Pittsburgh 13 15
Brooklyn FC 13 14
Las Vegas L. 13 14
Orange County 13 14
San Antonio 13 14
FC Tulsa 13 13

Defence (home)

GP GA
Detroit City 13 5
FC Tulsa 13 7
Sacramento R. 12 9
Charleston 13 9
Pittsburgh 13 10
Rhode Island 13 11
San Antonio 13 12
Lexington 13 13
Indy Eleven 14 13
Tampa Bay 12 14
Las Vegas L. 13 14
Hartford A. 12 15
Colorado S. 13 15
New Mexico 13 16
Louisville C. 13 16
Brooklyn FC 13 16
Phoenix Risi. 13 18
Orange County 13 18
Oakland Roots 14 18
Birmingham L. 14 18
El Paso 12 19
Monterey Bay 13 20
Miami FC 13 23
Loudoun Utd 13 23
Sporting JAX 13 38

Offence (away)

GP GF
Louisville C. 13 25
El Paso 14 24
Lexington 13 21
Orange County 13 21
FC Tulsa 13 18
Las Vegas L. 12 18
New Mexico 13 18
Colorado S. 13 17
Detroit City 13 17
Tampa Bay 14 17
Birmingham L. 11 16
Charleston 13 16
Oakland Roots 12 16
Rhode Island 12 15
San Antonio 13 15
Pittsburgh 14 13
Sacramento R. 13 13
Brooklyn FC 13 12
Loudoun Utd 12 12
Miami FC 14 12
Phoenix Risi. 13 12
Sporting JAX 14 12
Hartford A. 14 11
Monterey Bay 13 10
Indy Eleven 12 9

Defence (away)

GP GA
Tampa Bay 14 9
Hartford A. 14 11
Sacramento R. 13 13
El Paso 14 13
New Mexico 13 15
Detroit City 13 15
San Antonio 13 16
Rhode Island 12 17
Pittsburgh 14 17
Oakland Roots 12 17
FC Tulsa 13 17
Lexington 13 19
Indy Eleven 12 19
Phoenix Risi. 13 20
Loudoun Utd 12 20
Miami FC 14 21
Las Vegas L. 12 21
Orange County 13 22
Colorado S. 13 22
Charleston 13 22
Birmingham L. 11 24
Monterey Bay 13 26
Louisville C. 13 26
Sporting JAX 14 35
Brooklyn FC 13 36






Total Match Goals stats


Match total goals stats

Teams GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Sporting JAX  27 3.89 100% 85% 74% 56% 41% 15% 63% 0% 37% 0% 37%
Louisville City  26 3.27 96% 85% 58% 35% 23% 15% 69% 19% 15% 15% 12%
Charleston  26 3.19 100% 85% 58% 42% 23% 8% 46% 35% 19% 35% 19%
Birmingham L.  25 3.12 92% 80% 60% 48% 20% 4% 68% 20% 20% 12% 12%
Brooklyn FC  26 3.00 100% 81% 62% 42% 15% 0% 46% 12% 42% 12% 42%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats


Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)

Last 8 matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Birmingham L.  8 4.88 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 12% 75% 12% 12% 12% 12%
Sporting JAX  8 3.88 100% 88% 75% 62% 62% 0% 62% 0% 38% 0% 38%
Lexington  8 3.50 100% 75% 62% 50% 50% 12% 50% 25% 25% 25% 25%
New Mexico  8 3.38 88% 75% 75% 38% 25% 12% 75% 12% 25% 0% 12%
Orange County  8 3.38 100% 88% 50% 38% 38% 25% 50% 12% 38% 12% 38%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)


Match total goals stats (at home)

Teams (at home) GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Sporting JAX  13 4.46 100% 85% 85% 62% 46% 31% 69% 0% 31% 0% 31%
Miami FC  13 3.62 92% 85% 69% 54% 38% 15% 69% 15% 23% 8% 15%
Tampa Bay  12 3.50 100% 83% 67% 50% 17% 8% 42% 50% 8% 50% 8%
Charleston  13 3.46 100% 92% 62% 46% 38% 8% 54% 46% 0% 46% 0%
El Paso  12 3.33 100% 83% 58% 50% 42% 0% 75% 25% 0% 25% 0%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats (at home)


Match total goals stats (away)

Teams (away) GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Louisville City  13 3.92 100% 92% 69% 46% 31% 23% 85% 15% 0% 15% 0%
Brooklyn FC  13 3.69 100% 100% 85% 62% 23% 0% 46% 8% 46% 8% 46%
Birmingham L.  11 3.64 100% 100% 73% 64% 27% 0% 82% 0% 18% 0% 18%
Sporting JAX  14 3.36 100% 86% 64% 50% 36% 0% 57% 0% 43% 0% 43%
Orange County  13 3.31 100% 85% 54% 46% 31% 15% 77% 15% 8% 15% 8%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats (away)

Example
0.5+: matches where the total number of goals (team goals + opponent goals) was over 0.5





Segments Table

0 pt Segments table progression arrow 52 pts
5th Segment 4th Segment 3rd Segment 2nd Segment 1st Segment
up to 10.0 pts from 10.1 to 20.5 pts from 20.6 to 31.0 pts from 31.1 to 41.5 pts from 41.6 to 52 pts
(26)  18  Monterey Bay
(26)  18  Brooklyn FC
(27)  14  Sporting JAX
(25)  23  Birmingham L.
(25)  23  Loudoun Utd
(26)  41  FC Tulsa
(26)  40  Lexington
(25)  40  Sacramento R.
(26)  39  Colorado S.
(26)  39  Hartford A.
(26)  39  Orange County
(26)  38  San Antonio
(27)  38  Pittsburgh
(26)  37  Louisville City
(25)  35  Rhode Island
(26)  33  Indy Eleven
(26)  33  Oakland Roots
(26)  33  Phoenix Rising
(25)  33  Las Vegas L.
(27)  33  Miami FC
(26)  52  Tampa Bay
(26)  47  El Paso
(26)  46  Charleston
(26)  44  Detroit City
(26)  43  New Mexico

The Segments Table is a visual representation splitting the teams into 5 segments. Each team is assigned to a specific segment, depending on the team's number of points. Each of the 5 segments spans one-fifth (20%) of the total points held by the team ranked 1st in the league. For each team, the number of matches played appears in green between brackets, and the number of points is displayed in black.








Thu 1 Oct
SAC - VEG
Sat 3 Oct
LOU - IND
Sun 4 Oct
BRO - RHO
Sun 4 Oct
DET - BIR
Sun 4 Oct
LEX - ELP
Sun 4 Oct
TPB - MIA
Sun 4 Oct
TUL - SAC
Sun 4 Oct
COL - OAK
Sun 4 Oct
ORA - MON
Sun 4 Oct
VEG - SAN




League statistics

324 matches played / 375
86.4% completed
Home wins:  44%
Over 1.5 goals:  72%
Draws:  29%
Over 2.5 goals:  50%
Away wins:  27%
Over 3.5 goals:  32%
Goals:  883 Home goals per match:  1.52
Goals per match:  2.73 Away goals per match:  1.20
    Both teams scored:  54%

Results

 Latest results
 Matches by date
 Matches by Matchweek
 Results grid
 Results filter
 Outcome Surprise-Levels

Tables

 Home / Away tables
 Wide table
 Tables by Date
 Form tables
 Projected points

Analysis

 Goals statistics
 Points performance
 Over / Under
 Scored / Conceded
 Home advantage
 Relative form
 Run-in analysis

Goal times

 When goals were scored
 1st-half / 2nd-half
 First team to score
 Goal types
 Lead durations
 Points Won/Lost
Home team scored first: 53% No goal scored: 9% Away team scored first: 37%
Average minute when home team scored first: 32 min. Average minute when away team scored first: 32 min.
Home team lead-defending rate: 61% Away team lead-defending rate: 51%
Home team equalizing rate: 49% Away team equalizing rate: 39%
Home team lead duration: 29% Teams level in goals: 52% Away team lead duration: 20%
Home PPG when home team scored first: 2.35 Away PPG when away team scored first: 2.10

More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 324 matches played in the league, a total of 883 goals have been scored (2.73 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including the league results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded.

 

SoccerSTATS.com - Public edition

SoccerSTATS.com provides football statistics, results and blog articles on national and international soccer competitions worldwide. Football fans can keep a tab on stats related to their favourite team or leagues of interest, and access a wide range of team performance data analytics and league standings, not only on the world's most famous professional leagues, but also on amateur and regional leagues over the world. Example of soccer statistics include league standings, form tables, top goal scorers, scoring stats, statistical previews and goal timing statistics.
Follow us on Twitter
F.A.Q. Contact Privacy Policy Do Not Sell My Information
Terms & conditions of use About us Cookie usage and options Membership information
Mobile app
To our loyal users: PLEASE SUPPORT US

Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. Products, services, promotional offers and other offerings from partners and advertisers are subject to terms and conditions. By using this website you certify that you agree with the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy and that you are over the age of 18 or that you have the permission of a parent or guardian to use this website, after your parent or guardian has carefully reviewed and agreed to the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy. The website's content is provided for informational purposes only is not to be relied upon as a professional opinion whatsover. Nothing on this website should be considered as advice. This website is not associated with nor endorsed by any league or competition (whether professional, collegiate or other types of leagues / competitions), federation, association, club or team. All trademarks, brands, images, logos and names appearing on this website belong to their respective owners.
Useful links (third-party websites):   www.gamcare.org.uk       www.begambleaware.org        gamblingtherapy.org
 
   
Copyright 1998-2026 SoccerSTATS.com
back to top