back to top
LEAGUES MATCHES STATS FAV BLOG MEMBER LOGIN
usa6
USA - NWSL
LATEST MATCHES FORM H2H GOALS HALF-TIME TIMING FIRST GOAL FAVOURITE
🔍

Chicago RS W vs Bay FC W

advertisement


Visual table

  GP Pts
1  Gotham FC W 20 43
2  Utah Royals W 20 36
3  Washington S. W 19 36
4  San Diego W. W 20 33
5  Portland T. W 19 31
6  N. Carolina W 18 30
7  KC Current W 20 30
8  Seattle Reign W 18 27
9  Angel City W 17 24
10  Denver Summit W 19 24
11  Orlando Pride W 19 23
12  Boston Legacy W 19 20
13  Houston Dash W 18 20
14  Bay FC W 19 19
15  R. Louisville W 18 17
16  Chicago RS W 19 13

 
Mon 10 Aug 2026
Chicago RS W0 0Bay FC W






Seasonal streaks


2nd consecutive home game with no goal scored for Chicago RS W.
2nd consecutive away game with no goal scored for Bay FC W.
 

 
Lead durations in 90 minutes of regular time
090
Chicago RS WLevel (90)Bay FC W
Lead durations tables
  How are the duration values calculated?

To calculate the above duration values based on a total of 90 minutes, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are considered scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are considered scored on the 90th minute.


Outcome Surprise-Level

Points Per Game (before the match)
Chicago RS W at home1.13
Bay FC W away1.25
OutcomeOutcome surprise-level
Draw
6.3%
Scale: from 0 (less surprising) to 100 (more surprising)

Outcome Surprise-levels

More information on the calculation of the Outcome surprise-level is outlined in the following blog article:
Evaluating surprising results







 






 flag

Chicago Red Stars W

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 9 3 1 5  
  Away 10 1 0 9  
  Total 19 4 1 14  
PPG (Home): 1.11
PPG (Away): 0.30
PPG (Total): 0.68


Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game0.68 0.50 -26.5%
AVG Goals For0.47 0.50 +6.4%
AVG Goals Against1.79 1.50 -16.2%



Chicago RS W's progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
15 Mar Angel City W 4:0

1-0   Kennedy Linh Fuller (33)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Evelyn Shores (53)

3-0   A. Borges (66)

4-0   M. Niehues (70)
Chicago RS W + - + 1-0
22 Mar Chicago RS W 2:1

1-0   Tessa Dellarose (42)

---------------------------------------
2-0   J. Huitema (50)

     2-1   H. Hopkins (57)
KC Current W + - - 1-0
26 Mar Chicago RS W 0:3

     0-1   Barbra Banda (13)

     0-2   L. Muoz (22)

     0-3   H. Anderson (35)

Orlando Pride W + - + 0-3
29 Mar San Diego W. W 2:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Lia Eugenia Godfrey (56)

2-0   M. Barcenas (72)
Chicago RS W - - + 0-0
4 Apr Utah Royals W 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Mina Tanaka (74) pen.
Chicago RS W - - + 0-0
25 Apr Chicago RS W 2:0

1-0   J. Huitema (10)

---------------------------------------
2-0   N. Coelho (51)
Boston Legacy W - + - 1-0
30 Apr Chicago RS W 0:2

     0-1   Jordynn Araya Dudley (1)

     0-2   R. Lavelle (10)

Gotham FC W - - + 0-2
3 May Chicago RS W 0:2

     0-1   Olivia Lynn Moultrie (17)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Reilyn Sky Turner (89)
Portland T. W - - + 0-1
10 May KC Current W 3:0

1-0   Temwa Chawinga (22)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Temwa Chawinga (47)

3-0   Temwa Chawinga (49)
Chicago RS W + - + 1-0
16 May N. Carolina W 4:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Evelyn Ijeh (47)

2-0   A. Sanchez (61)

3-0   A. Schlegel (65)

4-0   Manaka Matsukubo (86)
Chicago RS W + - + 0-0
24 May Bay FC W 0:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   M. Swanson (70)
Chicago RS W - + - 0-0
31 May Chicago RS W 0:2

     0-1   M. Silva (3)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Trinity Paula Byars (90)
San Diego W. W - - + 0-1
5 Jul Chicago RS W 3:2

1-0   J. Huitema (20)

     1-1   C. Lacasse (43)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   Cecelia Anne Delzer (54) pen.

2-2   Samantha Keala Staab (59)

3-2   J. Huitema (86)
Utah Royals W + - - 1-1
11 Jul Boston Legacy W 2:0

1-0   A. Santos (22) pen.

---------------------------------------
2-0   N. Prince (58)
Chicago RS W - - + 1-0
18 Jul Chicago RS W 0:2

---------------------------------------
     0-1   M. Niehues (56) pen.

     0-2   S. Jnsdttir (90)
Angel City W - - + 0-0
25 Jul Orlando Pride W 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Julie Kate Doyle (88)
Chicago RS W - - + 0-0
1 Aug R. Louisville W 2:1

---------------------------------------
1-0   Mirann Gacioch (55)

2-0   Kayla Fischer (62)

     2-1   N. Coelho (80)
Chicago RS W + - - 0-0
9 Aug Chicago RS W 0:0

Bay FC W - + + 0-0
15 Aug Seattle Reign W 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Madison Mercado (53)
Chicago RS W - - + 0-0



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
20 Aug Houston Dash W vs Chicago RS W 1.50 0.30
23 Aug Chicago RS W vs R. Louisville W 1.11 0.60
30 Aug Denver Summit W vs Chicago RS W 1.33 0.30
6 Sep Chicago RS W vs N. Carolina W 1.11 1.89
13 Sep Portland T. W vs Chicago RS W 2.25 0.30
20 Sep Chicago RS W vs Washington S. W 1.11 2.00
26 Sep Gotham FC W vs Chicago RS W 2.18 0.30
4 Oct Chicago RS W vs Denver Summit W 1.11 1.20
18 Oct Chicago RS W vs Seattle Reign W 1.11 1.44
24 Oct Chicago RS W vs Houston Dash W 1.11 0.63
1 Nov Washington S. W vs Chicago RS W 1.78 0.30
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.53

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins ---
Consecutive draws 1--
Consecutive defeats -41
No win 246
No draw -101
No defeat 1--
1 goal scored or more ---
1 goal conceded or more -41
No goal scored 212
No goal conceded 1--
GF+GA over 2.5 ---
GF+GA under 2.5 212
Scored at least twice ---










Comparison with league average


Chicago RS W (19 matches) vs league average

(overall)Chicago RS W League AVG
Points per game  0.68 1.41
% Wins  21% 41%
% Draws  5% 18%
% Defeats  74% 41%
Goals scored per game  0.47 1.33
Goals conceded per game  1.79 1.33
% Clean sheets  16% 28%
% Failed To Score  74% 28%
% Won To Nil  11% 23%
% Lost To Nil  68% 23%
% Team scored first  21% 47%
% Opponent scored first  74% 47%
Average minute scored first  36 28
Average minute conceded first  39 28
Lead-defending rate  80% 64%
Equalizing rate  7% 36%
% Time leading  10% 27%
% Time level in goals  47% 46%
% Time trailing  42% 27%
PPG when scored first  3.00 2.40
PPG when conceded first  0.00 0.47
Total goals per game  2.26 2.66
% over 1.5 goals  74% 75%
% over 2.5 goals  37% 54%
% over 3.5 goals  16% 26%
% both teams scored  16% 50%

Chicago RS W at home (9 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Chicago RS W League AVG
Points per game  1.11 1.59
% Wins  33% 47%
% Draws  11% 18%
% Defeats  56% 35%
Goals scored per game  0.78 1.48
Goals conceded per game  1.56 1.19
% Clean sheets  22% 30%
% Failed To Score  67% 26%
% Won To Nil  11% 25%
% Lost To Nil  56% 21%
% Team scored first  33% 45%
% Opponent scored first  56% 50%
Average minute scored first  24 31
Average minute conceded first  18 26
Lead-defending rate  75% 68%
Equalizing rate  17% 40%
% Time leading  19% 27%
% Time level in goals  36% 46%
% Time trailing  45% 28%
PPG when scored first  3.00 2.65
PPG when conceded first  0.00 0.69
Total goals per game  2.33 2.66
% over 1.5 goals  89% 75%
% over 2.5 goals  33% 54%
% over 3.5 goals  11% 26%
% both teams scored  22% 50%

Chicago RS W away (10 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Chicago RS W League AVG
Points per game  0.30 1.23
% Wins  10% 35%
% Draws  0% 18%
% Defeats  90% 47%
Goals scored per game  0.20 1.19
Goals conceded per game  2.00 1.48
% Clean sheets  10% 26%
% Failed To Score  80% 30%
% Won To Nil  10% 21%
% Lost To Nil  80% 25%
% Team scored first  10% 50%
% Opponent scored first  90% 45%
Average minute scored first  70 26
Average minute conceded first  50 31
Lead-defending rate  100% 60%
Equalizing rate  0% 32%
% Time leading  2% 28%
% Time level in goals  58% 46%
% Time trailing  40% 27%
PPG when scored first  3.00 2.17
PPG when conceded first  0.00 0.22
Total goals per game  2.20 2.66
% over 1.5 goals  60% 75%
% over 2.5 goals  40% 54%
% over 3.5 goals  20% 26%
% both teams scored  10% 50%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Chicago RS W
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 4 / 19 21%
  Opponent scored first 14 / 19 74%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 2 / 19 11%
  Opponent was leading at HT 7 / 19 37%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 9.2 min. 10%
  Average minutes level in goals 42.6 min. 47%
  Average minutes trailing 38.2 min. 42%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Chicago Red Stars W have been in the lead for an average duration of 9.2 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 38.2 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Chicago RS W
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 19

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 5
  Equalizer goals conceded 1
  Lead defending rate * (1) 80%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 15
  Equalizer goals scored 1
  Equalizing rate * (2) 7%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 3
  Non-crucial goals conceded 18

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Chicago Red Stars W have taken the lead 5 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a lead-defending rate of 80% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 20%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 15 times that Chicago RS W's opponents have taken the lead, Chicago RS W have managed to score an equalizer on 1 instance, translating into an equalizing rate of 7%.


 flag Chicago RS W
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 3 / 9 33%
  Opponent scored first 5 / 9 56%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 2 / 9 22%
  Opponent was leading at HT 4 / 9 44%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 17.2 min. 19%
  Average minutes level in goals 32.2 min. 36%
  Average minutes trailing 40.6 min. 45%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Chicago RS W have been in the lead for an average duration of 17.2 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 40.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Chicago RS W
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 9

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 4
  Equalizer goals conceded 1
  Lead defending rate * (1) 75%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 6
  Equalizer goals scored 1
  Equalizing rate * (2) 17%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 2
  Non-crucial goals conceded 7

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Chicago RS W have taken the lead 4 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 75% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 25%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 6 times that Chicago RS W's opponents have taken the lead when Chicago RS W were playing at home, Chicago RS W have managed to score an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a home equalizing rate of 17%.



 flag Chicago RS W
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 1 / 10 10%
  Opponent scored first 9 / 10 90%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 0 / 10 0%
  Opponent was leading at HT 3 / 10 30%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 2.0 min. 2%
  Average minutes level in goals 52.0 min. 58%
  Average minutes trailing 36.0 min. 40%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Chicago RS W have been in the lead for an average duration of 2.0 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 36.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Chicago RS W
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 10

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 1
  Equalizer goals conceded 0
  Lead defending rate * (1) 100%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 9
  Equalizer goals scored 0
  Equalizing rate * (2) 0%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 1
  Non-crucial goals conceded 11

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Chicago RS W have taken the lead 1 time and have conceded an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 100% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 0%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 9 times that Chicago RS W's opponents have taken the lead when Chicago RS W were playing away, Chicago RS W have managed to score an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 0%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Gotham FC W 20 43 0:2 26 Sep h2h
2 Utah Royals W 20 36 3:2 1:0 h2h
3 Washington S. W 19 36 20 Sep 1 Nov h2h
4 San Diego W. W 20 33 0:2 2:0 h2h
5 Portland T. W 19 31 0:2 13 Sep h2h
6 N. Carolina W 18 30 6 Sep 4:0 h2h
7 KC Current W 20 30 2:1 3:0 h2h
8 Seattle Reign W 18 27 18 Oct 1:0 h2h
9 Angel City W 17 24 0:2 4:0 h2h
10 Denver Summit W 19 24 4 Oct 30 Aug h2h
11 Orlando Pride W 19 23 0:3 1:0 h2h
12 Boston Legacy W 19 20 2:0 2:0 h2h
13 Houston Dash W 18 20 24 Oct 20 Aug h2h
14 Bay FC W 19 19 0:0 0:1 h2h
15 R. Louisville W 18 17 23 Aug 2:1 h2h
16 Chicago RS W 19 13








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 7 29
GF per match 0.780.20 0.47
Goals conceded (GA) 142034
GA per match 1.562.00 1.79
GF + GA per match 2.332.202.26
GF+GA over 0.5 89%100%95%
GF+GA over 1.5 89%60%74%
GF+GA over 2.5 33%40%37%
GF+GA over 3.5 11%20%16%
GF+GA over 4.5 11%0%5%
GF+GA over 5.5 0%0%0%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 78%30%53%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 33%0%16%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 11%0%5%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 22%10%16%
Won-to-nil 11%10%11%
Failed to score 67%80%74%
Lost-to-nil 56%80%68%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 33%20%26%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 33%0%16%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 33%20%26%
Scored in both halves 33%0%16%
Both teams scored 22%10%16%
Conceding Rate 78%90%84%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 56%30%42%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 56%90%74%
Conceded in both halves 33%30%32%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 33%20%26%
GF over 1.5 33%0%16%
GF over 2.5 11%0%5%
GF over 3.5 0%0%0%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 78%90%84%
GA over 1.5 67%60%63%
GA over 2.5 11%30%21%
GA over 3.5 0%20%11%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Chicago RS W matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 11%0%5%
Match total goals = 1 0%40%21%
Match total goals = 2 56%20%37%
Match total goals = 3 22%20%21%
Match total goals = 4 0%20%11%
Match total goals = 5+ 11%0%5%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 11%40%26%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 78%40%58%
Match total goals = 4+ 11%20%16%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  21 00
Away wins  10 00
Home & Away wins  31 00
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  04 10
Away defeats  42 12
Home & Away defeats  46 22

A majority of Chicago RS W's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (3 wins), while 1 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more.

A majority of Chicago RS W's defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (10 defeats), while 4 of their defeats had a one-goal margin.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 77%
23%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.11
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)0.30
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 78%
22%
  % Goals conceded 41%
59%
  League average 55%
45%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 20 2  11%
Drawing at HT 37 10  53%
Losing at HT 43 7  37%
  Total 91019







Goal times


 flag Chicago RS W
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 1
GA 4
16-30 GF 1
GA 4
31-45 GF 1
GA 3
46-60 GF 3
GA 11
61-75 GF 1
GA 7
76-90 GF 2
GA 5
1st Half GF 3
33%
GA 11
32%
2nd Half GF 6
67%
GA 23
68%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 52
 Avg. minute goals conceded 51


  Chicago RS W
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 1
GA 4
16-30 GF 1
GA 2
31-45 GF 1
GA 2
46-60 GF 3
GA 3
61-75 GF 0
GA 0
76-90 GF 1
GA 3
1st Half GF 3
43%
GA 8
57%
2nd Half GF 4
57%
GA 6
43%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 45
  Avg. minute goals conceded 41


  Chicago RS W
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 0
GA 0
16-30 GF 0
GA 2
31-45 GF 0
GA 1
46-60 GF 0
GA 8
61-75 GF 1
GA 7
76-90 GF 1
GA 2
1st Half GF 0
0%
GA 3
15%
2nd Half GF 2
100%
GA 17
85%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 75
  Avg. minute goals conceded 57








Chicago RS W scores

FT at home
0-2 4 44%
0-3 1 11%
3-2 1 11%
2-1 1 11%
2-0 1 11%
0-0 1 11%
FT away
1-0 3 30%
4-0 2 20%
2-0 2 20%
2-1 1 10%
0-1 1 10%
3-0 1 10%
The Chicago RS W score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 0-2 so far (4 times). The Chicago RS W score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-0 so far (3 times).
Half-time at home
0-1 2 22%
1-0 2 22%
0-0 2 22%
0-3 1 11%
0-2 1 11%
1-1 1 11%
Half-time away
0-0 7 70%
1-0 3 30%





This season in the league

Chicago RS W have failed to win in their last 6 matches.
Chicago RS W failed to keep a clean sheet in 7 of their 9 home matches.
Chicago RS W have failed to score in 6 of their 9 home matches.
Chicago RS W failed to keep a clean sheet in 9 of their 10 away matches.
Chicago RS W have failed to score in 8 of their 10 away matches.
77% of Chicago RS W's points have been earned at home.
Chicago RS W have scored 78% of their goals at home.
67% of Chicago RS W's goals have been scored in the second half.
68% of Chicago RS W's conceded goals occurred in the second half.
Chicago RS W have conceded the opening goal in 14 of their 19 matches.
Chicago RS W have lost 14 of their 19 matches.
Chicago RS W have lost 5 of their 9 home matches.
Chicago RS W have lost 9 of their 10 away matches.
Chicago RS W have lost their last 4 away matches.
Chicago RS W have failed to score in their last 2 home matches.

View comments for all teams



 flag

Bay FC W

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 9 2 2 5  
  Away 10 3 2 5  
  Total 19 5 4 10  
PPG (Home): 0.89
PPG (Away): 1.10
PPG (Total): 1.00


Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game1.00 1.00 0.0%
AVG Goals For1.05 1.38 +31.4%
AVG Goals Against1.42 1.25 -12.0%



Bay FC W's progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
14 Mar Bay FC W 2:1

1-0   A. Pfeiffer (8)

     1-1   K. Kssler (20)

2-1   Joelle Anderson (31)

Denver Summit W + - - 2-1
22 Mar Bay FC W 1:3

     0-1   S. Jnsdttir (3)

     0-2   G. Thompson (32)

---------------------------------------
     0-3   S. Jnsdttir (53)

1-3   Taylor Brooke Huff (56)
Angel City W + - - 0-2
28 Mar N. Carolina W 1:3

     0-1   A. Pfeiffer (20)

     0-2   Keira Kathleen Barry (30)

     0-3   Dorian Josey Bailey (34)

---------------------------------------
1-3   Manaka Matsukubo (65)
Bay FC W + - - 0-3
5 Apr Bay FC W 0:2

---------------------------------------
     0-1   B. Courtnall (o.g.) (57)

     0-2   Gift Nyakno Monday (86)
Washington S. W - - + 0-0
25 Apr Gotham FC W 3:0

1-0   Karlie Lema (o.g.) (20)

2-0   R. Lavelle (40)

3-0   E. Rodrguez (45) pen.

Bay FC W + - + 3-0
3 May San Diego W. W 0:1

     0-1   Racheal Kundananji (5)

Bay FC W - + - 0-1
10 May Bay FC W 0:0

Utah Royals W - + + 0-0
16 May Bay FC W 1:1

---------------------------------------
1-0   Dorian Josey Bailey (51)

     1-1   A. Santos (64) pen.
Boston Legacy W - - - 0-0
21 May Portland T. W 2:0

1-0   Mary Alice Vignola (30)

---------------------------------------
2-0   M. McKenzie (77)
Bay FC W - - + 1-0
24 May Bay FC W 0:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   M. Swanson (70)
Chicago RS W - - + 0-0
30 May Orlando Pride W 3:1

1-0   Barbra Banda (4)

     1-1   Caroline Noel Conti (7)

---------------------------------------
2-1   Barbra Banda (51)

3-1   C. Dyke (55)
Bay FC W + - - 1-1
5 Jul Boston Legacy W 2:2

     0-1   C. Hutton (5) pen.

     0-2   Karlie Lema (17)

1-2   A. Santos (45)

---------------------------------------
2-2   Assata Traor (79) pen.
Bay FC W + - - 1-2
11 Jul R. Louisville W 0:2

     0-1   Kennedy Linh Fuller (21)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Karlie Lema (58)
Bay FC W - + - 0-1
18 Jul Bay FC W 3:0

1-0   Karlie Lema (15)

2-0   Karlie Lema (17)

---------------------------------------
3-0   Racheal Kundananji (54)
N. Carolina W + + - 2-0
25 Jul Houston Dash W 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   L. Ullmark (90)
Bay FC W - - + 0-0
30 Jul Bay FC W 0:1

     0-1   M. Williams-Purce (2)

Gotham FC W - - + 0-1
2 Aug Bay FC W 2:3

     0-1   Mia Renee Fishel (5)

     0-2   M. Dahlien (10)

1-2   Hannah Bebar (13)

---------------------------------------
2-2   Keira Kathleen Barry (75)

     2-3   J. Fishlock (85)
Seattle Reign W + - - 1-2
9 Aug Chicago RS W 0:0

Bay FC W - + + 0-0
15 Aug Utah Royals W 3:2

     0-1   Karlie Lema (6)

1-1   Miyabi Moriya (7)

2-1   Narumi Miura (22)

     2-2   H. Gilchrist (29)

---------------------------------------
3-2   Mina Tanaka (79) pen.
Bay FC W + - - 2-2



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
23 Aug Bay FC W vs Houston Dash W 0.89 0.63
30 Aug Washington S. W vs Bay FC W 1.78 1.10
5 Sep Bay FC W vs KC Current W 0.89 0.64
13 Sep Seattle Reign W vs Bay FC W 1.56 1.10
17 Sep Denver Summit W vs Bay FC W 1.33 1.10
20 Sep Bay FC W vs R. Louisville W 0.89 0.60
27 Sep Bay FC W vs Orlando Pride W 0.89 0.78
3 Oct KC Current W vs Bay FC W 2.56 1.10
18 Oct Bay FC W vs Portland T. W 0.89 1.18
25 Oct Angel City W vs Bay FC W 1.33 1.10
1 Nov Bay FC W vs San Diego W. W 0.89 2.00
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.31

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins ---
Consecutive draws ---
Consecutive defeats 211
No win 235
No draw 411
No defeat ---
1 goal scored or more 111
1 goal conceded or more 211
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded ---
GF+GA over 2.5 111
GF+GA under 2.5 ---
Scored at least twice 111










Comparison with league average


Bay FC W (19 matches) vs league average

(overall)Bay FC W League AVG
Points per game  1.00 1.41
% Wins  26% 41%
% Draws  21% 18%
% Defeats  53% 41%
Goals scored per game  1.05 1.33
Goals conceded per game  1.42 1.33
% Clean sheets  26% 28%
% Failed To Score  42% 28%
% Won To Nil  16% 23%
% Lost To Nil  32% 23%
% Team scored first  42% 47%
% Opponent scored first  47% 47%
Average minute scored first  16 28
Average minute conceded first  31 28
Lead-defending rate  56% 64%
Equalizing rate  23% 36%
% Time leading  27% 27%
% Time level in goals  44% 46%
% Time trailing  29% 27%
PPG when scored first  2.13 2.40
PPG when conceded first  0.00 0.47
Total goals per game  2.47 2.66
% over 1.5 goals  68% 75%
% over 2.5 goals  47% 54%
% over 3.5 goals  32% 26%
% both teams scored  42% 50%

Bay FC W at home (9 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Bay FC W League AVG
Points per game  0.89 1.59
% Wins  22% 47%
% Draws  22% 18%
% Defeats  56% 35%
Goals scored per game  1.00 1.48
Goals conceded per game  1.33 1.19
% Clean sheets  22% 30%
% Failed To Score  44% 26%
% Won To Nil  11% 25%
% Lost To Nil  33% 21%
% Team scored first  33% 45%
% Opponent scored first  56% 50%
Average minute scored first  25 31
Average minute conceded first  27 26
Lead-defending rate  50% 68%
Equalizing rate  17% 40%
% Time leading  20% 27%
% Time level in goals  43% 46%
% Time trailing  37% 28%
PPG when scored first  2.33 2.65
PPG when conceded first  0.00 0.69
Total goals per game  2.33 2.66
% over 1.5 goals  67% 75%
% over 2.5 goals  44% 54%
% over 3.5 goals  22% 26%
% both teams scored  44% 50%

Bay FC W away (10 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Bay FC W League AVG
Points per game  1.10 1.23
% Wins  30% 35%
% Draws  20% 18%
% Defeats  50% 47%
Goals scored per game  1.10 1.19
Goals conceded per game  1.50 1.48
% Clean sheets  30% 26%
% Failed To Score  40% 30%
% Won To Nil  20% 21%
% Lost To Nil  30% 25%
% Team scored first  50% 50%
% Opponent scored first  40% 45%
Average minute scored first  11 26
Average minute conceded first  36 31
Lead-defending rate  60% 60%
Equalizing rate  29% 32%
% Time leading  33% 28%
% Time level in goals  46% 46%
% Time trailing  21% 27%
PPG when scored first  2.00 2.17
PPG when conceded first  0.00 0.22
Total goals per game  2.60 2.66
% over 1.5 goals  70% 75%
% over 2.5 goals  50% 54%
% over 3.5 goals  40% 26%
% both teams scored  40% 50%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Bay FC W
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 8 / 19 42%
  Opponent scored first 9 / 19 47%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 6 / 19 32%
  Opponent was leading at HT 5 / 19 26%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 24.1 min. 27%
  Average minutes level in goals 39.9 min. 44%
  Average minutes trailing 25.9 min. 29%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Bay FC W have been in the lead for an average duration of 24.1 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 25.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Bay FC W
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 19

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 9
  Equalizer goals conceded 4
  Lead defending rate * (1) 56%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 13
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 23%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 8
  Non-crucial goals conceded 10

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Bay FC W have taken the lead 9 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 56% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 44%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 13 times that Bay FC W's opponents have taken the lead, Bay FC W have managed to score an equalizer on 3 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 23%.


 flag Bay FC W
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 3 / 9 33%
  Opponent scored first 5 / 9 56%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 2 / 9 22%
  Opponent was leading at HT 3 / 9 33%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 17.7 min. 20%
  Average minutes level in goals 38.7 min. 43%
  Average minutes trailing 33.7 min. 37%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Bay FC W have been in the lead for an average duration of 17.7 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 33.7 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Bay FC W
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 9

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 4
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 50%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 6
  Equalizer goals scored 1
  Equalizing rate * (2) 17%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 4
  Non-crucial goals conceded 4

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Bay FC W have taken the lead 4 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 6 times that Bay FC W's opponents have taken the lead when Bay FC W were playing at home, Bay FC W have managed to score an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a home equalizing rate of 17%.



 flag Bay FC W
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 5 / 10 50%
  Opponent scored first 4 / 10 40%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 4 / 10 40%
  Opponent was leading at HT 2 / 10 20%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 29.9 min. 33%
  Average minutes level in goals 41.1 min. 46%
  Average minutes trailing 19.0 min. 21%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Bay FC W have been in the lead for an average duration of 29.9 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is longer than the average duration of 19.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Bay FC W
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 10

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 5
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 60%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 7
  Equalizer goals scored 2
  Equalizing rate * (2) 29%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 4
  Non-crucial goals conceded 6

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Bay FC W have taken the lead 5 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 60% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 40%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 7 times that Bay FC W's opponents have taken the lead when Bay FC W were playing away, Bay FC W have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 29%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Gotham FC W 20 43 0:1 3:0 h2h
2 Utah Royals W 20 36 0:0 3:2 h2h
3 Washington S. W 19 36 0:2 30 Aug h2h
4 San Diego W. W 20 33 1 Nov 0:1 h2h
5 Portland T. W 19 31 18 Oct 2:0 h2h
6 N. Carolina W 18 30 3:0 1:3 h2h
7 KC Current W 20 30 5 Sep 3 Oct h2h
8 Seattle Reign W 18 27 2:3 13 Sep h2h
9 Angel City W 17 24 1:3 25 Oct h2h
10 Denver Summit W 19 24 2:1 17 Sep h2h
11 Orlando Pride W 19 23 27 Sep 3:1 h2h
12 Boston Legacy W 19 20 1:1 2:2 h2h
13 Houston Dash W 18 20 23 Aug 1:0 h2h
14 Bay FC W 19 19
15 R. Louisville W 18 17 20 Sep 0:2 h2h
16 Chicago RS W 19 13 0:1 0:0 h2h








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 9 1120
GF per match 1.001.10 1.05
Goals conceded (GA) 121527
GA per match 1.331.50 1.42
GF + GA per match 2.332.602.47
GF+GA over 0.5 89%90%89%
GF+GA over 1.5 67%70%68%
GF+GA over 2.5 44%50%47%
GF+GA over 3.5 22%40%32%
GF+GA over 4.5 11%10%11%
GF+GA over 5.5 0%0%0%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 56%80%68%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 44%50%47%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 22%40%32%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 22%30%26%
Won-to-nil 11%20%16%
Failed to score 44%40%42%
Lost-to-nil 33%30%32%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 56%60%58%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 33%60%47%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 44%10%26%
Scored in both halves 22%10%16%
Both teams scored 44%40%42%
Conceding Rate 78%70%74%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 44%50%47%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 56%60%58%
Conceded in both halves 22%40%32%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 56%60%58%
GF over 1.5 33%40%37%
GF over 2.5 11%10%11%
GF over 3.5 0%0%0%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 78%70%74%
GA over 1.5 33%50%42%
GA over 2.5 22%30%26%
GA over 3.5 0%0%0%
GA over 4.5 0%0%0%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Bay FC W matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 11%10%11%
Match total goals = 1 22%20%21%
Match total goals = 2 22%20%21%
Match total goals = 3 22%10%16%
Match total goals = 4 11%30%21%
Match total goals = 5+ 11%10%11%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 33%30%32%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 44%30%37%
Match total goals = 4+ 22%40%32%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  10 10
Away wins  12 00
Home & Away wins  22 10
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  32 00
Away defeats  22 10
Home & Away defeats  54 10

A majority of Bay FC W's wins have been obtained with a margin of 2 goals or more (3 wins), while 2 of their wins had a one-goal margin. Bay FC W have conceded as many one-goal margin defeats as defeats with a margin of 2 goals or more (5 defeats for each).









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 42%
58%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)0.89
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)1.10
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 45%
55%
  % Goals conceded 44%
56%
  League average 55%
45%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 24 6  32%
Drawing at HT 44 8  42%
Losing at HT 32 5  26%
  Total 91019







Goal times


 flag Bay FC W
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 7
GA 6
16-30 GF 6
GA 4
31-45 GF 2
GA 4
46-60 GF 4
GA 4
61-75 GF 1
GA 3
76-90 GF 0
GA 6
1st Half GF 15
75%
GA 14
52%
2nd Half GF 5
25%
GA 13
48%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 28
 Avg. minute goals conceded 44


  Bay FC W
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 3
GA 4
16-30 GF 1
GA 1
31-45 GF 1
GA 1
46-60 GF 3
GA 2
61-75 GF 1
GA 2
76-90 GF 0
GA 2
1st Half GF 5
56%
GA 6
50%
2nd Half GF 4
44%
GA 6
50%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 36
  Avg. minute goals conceded 41


  Bay FC W
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 4
GA 2
16-30 GF 5
GA 3
31-45 GF 1
GA 3
46-60 GF 1
GA 2
61-75 GF 0
GA 1
76-90 GF 0
GA 4
1st Half GF 10
91%
GA 8
53%
2nd Half GF 1
9%
GA 7
47%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 21
  Avg. minute goals conceded 47








Bay FC W scores

FT at home
0-1 2 22%
2-3 1 11%
1-3 1 11%
0-2 1 11%
2-1 1 11%
1-1 1 11%
3-0 1 11%
0-0 1 11%
FT away
1-3 1 10%
3-2 1 10%
2-2 1 10%
0-2 1 10%
3-1 1 10%
0-1 1 10%
3-0 1 10%
2-0 1 10%
1-0 1 10%
0-0 1 10%
The Bay FC W score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 0-1 so far (2 times).
Half-time at home
0-0 4 44%
1-2 1 11%
0-2 1 11%
2-1 1 11%
0-1 1 11%
2-0 1 11%
Half-time away
0-1 2 20%
0-0 2 20%
0-3 1 10%
2-2 1 10%
1-2 1 10%
1-1 1 10%
3-0 1 10%
1-0 1 10%





This season in the league

Bay FC W have failed to win in their last 5 matches.
Bay FC W failed to keep a clean sheet in 7 of their 9 home matches.
Bay FC W have failed to score in 4 of their 9 home matches.
58% of Bay FC W's points have been earned away.
Bay FC W have scored 75% of their goals in the first half.
Bay FC W have lost 5 of their 9 home matches.
Bay FC W have lost their last 2 home matches.
Bay FC W have scored 35% of their goals in the first 15 minutes.
22% of Bay FC W's conceded goals occurred in the first 15 minutes.

View comments for all teams















Tables overview

Points

GP pts
Gotham FC W 20 43
Utah Royals W 20 36
Washington S. 19 36
San Diego W.. 20 33
Portland T. W 19 31
N. Carolina W 18 30
KC Current W 20 30
Seattle Reig. 18 27
Angel City W 17 24
Denver Summi. 19 24
Orlando Prid. 19 23
Boston Legac. 19 20
Houston Dash. 18 20
Bay FC W 19 19
R. Louisvill. 18 17
Chicago RS W 19 13

Form (last 8)

GP pts
Gotham FC W 8 22
N. Carolina W 8 15
Washington S. 8 15
Seattle Reig. 8 13
Utah Royals W 8 12
Angel City W 8 11
Boston Legac. 8 11
San Diego W.. 8 11
R. Louisvill. 8 10
KC Current W 8 9
Houston Dash. 8 9
Denver Summi. 8 9
Orlando Prid. 8 9
Bay FC W 8 8
Portland T. W 8 8
Chicago RS W 8 4

Home

GP pts
Gotham FC W 11 24
KC Current W 9 23
Utah Royals W 10 21
Portland T. W 8 18
Washington S. 9 16
Orlando Prid. 10 16
Houston Dash. 10 15
Seattle Reig. 9 14
Boston Legac. 12 14
N. Carolina W 9 13
San Diego W.. 10 13
Angel City W 9 12
Denver Summi. 9 12
R. Louisvill. 8 11
Chicago RS W 9 10
Bay FC W 9 8

Away

GP pts
Washington S. 10 20
San Diego W.. 10 20
Gotham FC W 9 19
N. Carolina W 9 17
Utah Royals W 10 15
Seattle Reig. 9 13
Portland T. W 11 13
Angel City W 8 12
Denver Summi. 10 12
Bay FC W 10 11
Orlando Prid. 9 7
KC Current W 11 7
Boston Legac. 7 6
R. Louisvill. 10 6
Houston Dash. 8 5
Chicago RS W 10 3

Offence

GP GF
Utah Royals W 20 35
N. Carolina W 18 32
Portland T. W 19 32
KC Current W 20 31
Washington S. 19 29
Angel City W 17 26
Gotham FC W 20 26
Denver Summi. 19 25
San Diego W.. 20 25
R. Louisvill. 18 24
Orlando Prid. 19 23
Seattle Reig. 18 23
Boston Legac. 19 22
Bay FC W 19 20
Houston Dash. 18 20
Chicago RS W 19 9

Defence

GP GA
Gotham FC W 20 13
Washington S. 19 17
Angel City W 17 19
San Diego W.. 20 21
Utah Royals W 20 23
Seattle Reig. 18 23
Denver Summi. 19 25
N. Carolina W 18 26
Houston Dash. 18 26
Bay FC W 19 27
Portland T. W 19 28
KC Current W 20 28
Boston Legac. 19 28
Orlando Prid. 19 29
Chicago RS W 19 34
R. Louisvill. 18 35

Offence (last 8)

GP GF
N. Carolina W 8 17
Utah Royals W 8 17
Portland T. W 8 15
Gotham FC W 8 14
Seattle Reig. 8 14
KC Current W 8 13
Angel City W 8 12
Bay FC W 8 11
Boston Legac. 8 11
Washington S. 8 11
R. Louisvill. 8 9
Denver Summi. 8 8
Houston Dash. 8 8
Orlando Prid. 8 8
San Diego W.. 8 8
Chicago RS W 8 4

Defence (last 8)

GP GA
Gotham FC W 8 6
Washington S. 8 8
San Diego W.. 8 8
Houston Dash. 8 9
Angel City W 8 9
Boston Legac. 8 10
Bay FC W 8 10
KC Current W 8 11
Seattle Reig. 8 12
Denver Summi. 8 12
Chicago RS W 8 12
Utah Royals W 8 13
Orlando Prid. 8 13
N. Carolina W 8 14
R. Louisvill. 8 16
Portland T. W 8 19

Offence (home)

GP GF
KC Current W 9 22
N. Carolina W 9 19
Boston Legac. 12 18
Utah Royals W 10 18
Portland T. W 8 16
Orlando Prid. 10 15
Angel City W 9 14
Houston Dash. 10 14
Washington S. 9 14
Gotham FC W 11 13
Denver Summi. 9 12
R. Louisvill. 8 12
San Diego W.. 10 10
Seattle Reig. 9 10
Bay FC W 9 9
Chicago RS W 9 7

Defence (home)

GP GA
Portland T. W 8 4
Gotham FC W 11 6
KC Current W 9 7
Washington S. 9 9
Seattle Reig. 9 9
San Diego W.. 10 10
Utah Royals W 10 11
Angel City W 9 11
R. Louisvill. 8 12
Bay FC W 9 12
Orlando Prid. 10 13
Houston Dash. 10 13
Denver Summi. 9 14
Chicago RS W 9 14
N. Carolina W 9 15
Boston Legac. 12 19

Offence (away)

GP GF
Utah Royals W 10 17
Portland T. W 11 16
San Diego W.. 10 15
Washington S. 10 15
Denver Summi. 10 13
Gotham FC W 9 13
N. Carolina W 9 13
Seattle Reig. 9 13
Angel City W 8 12
R. Louisvill. 10 12
Bay FC W 10 11
KC Current W 11 9
Orlando Prid. 9 8
Houston Dash. 8 6
Boston Legac. 7 4
Chicago RS W 10 2

Defence (away)

GP GA
Gotham FC W 9 7
Washington S. 10 8
Angel City W 8 8
Boston Legac. 7 9
San Diego W.. 10 11
N. Carolina W 9 11
Denver Summi. 10 11
Utah Royals W 10 12
Houston Dash. 8 13
Seattle Reig. 9 14
Bay FC W 10 15
Orlando Prid. 9 16
Chicago RS W 10 20
KC Current W 11 21
R. Louisvill. 10 23
Portland T. W 11 24






Total Match Goals stats


Match total goals stats

Teams GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
R. Louisville W  18 3.28 100% 83% 72% 39% 17% 11% 72% 0% 28% 0% 28%
N. Carolina W  18 3.22 94% 83% 72% 44% 17% 6% 56% 28% 22% 22% 17%
Portland T. W  19 3.16 95% 89% 58% 47% 11% 11% 53% 42% 11% 37% 5%
KC Current W  20 2.95 100% 90% 75% 20% 5% 5% 55% 20% 25% 20% 25%
Utah Royals W  20 2.90 95% 75% 65% 30% 20% 5% 65% 30% 10% 25% 5%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats


Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)

Last 8 matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Portland T. W  8 4.25 100% 100% 88% 75% 25% 25% 75% 12% 12% 12% 12%
N. Carolina W  8 3.88 100% 100% 75% 50% 38% 12% 50% 25% 25% 25% 25%
Utah Royals W  8 3.75 100% 75% 75% 62% 50% 12% 75% 12% 12% 12% 12%
Seattle Reign W  8 3.25 100% 88% 62% 50% 25% 0% 62% 38% 0% 38% 0%
R. Louisville W  8 3.13 100% 88% 62% 38% 12% 12% 62% 0% 38% 0% 38%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)


Match total goals stats (at home)

Teams (at home) GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
N. Carolina W  9 3.78 100% 100% 89% 67% 22% 0% 67% 22% 11% 22% 11%
KC Current W  9 3.22 100% 89% 78% 33% 11% 11% 67% 33% 0% 33% 0%
Boston Legacy W  12 3.08 100% 75% 67% 33% 17% 8% 67% 17% 17% 17% 17%
R. Louisville W  8 3.00 100% 88% 62% 38% 12% 0% 75% 0% 25% 0% 25%
Utah Royals W  10 2.90 100% 70% 60% 30% 20% 10% 60% 30% 10% 30% 10%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats (at home)


Match total goals stats (away)

Teams (away) GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Portland T. W  11 3.64 100% 91% 73% 55% 18% 18% 73% 18% 9% 18% 9%
R. Louisville W  10 3.50 100% 80% 80% 40% 20% 20% 70% 0% 30% 0% 30%
Seattle Reign W  9 3.00 89% 89% 67% 33% 22% 0% 67% 22% 22% 11% 11%
Utah Royals W  10 2.90 90% 80% 70% 30% 20% 0% 70% 30% 10% 20% 0%
KC Current W  11 2.73 100% 91% 73% 9% 0% 0% 45% 9% 45% 9% 45%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats (away)

Example
0.5+: matches where the total number of goals (team goals + opponent goals) was over 0.5





Segments Table

0 pt Segments table progression arrow 43 pts
5th Segment 4th Segment 3rd Segment 2nd Segment 1st Segment
up to 8.2 pts from 8.3 to 16.9 pts from 17.0 to 25.6 pts from 25.7 to 34.3 pts from 34.4 to 43 pts
(19)  13  Chicago RS W (17)  24  Angel City W
(19)  24  Denver Summit W
(19)  23  Orlando Pride W
(19)  20  Boston Legacy W
(18)  20  Houston Dash W
(19)  19  Bay FC W
(18)  17  R. Louisville W
(20)  33  San Diego W. W
(19)  31  Portland T. W
(18)  30  N. Carolina W
(20)  30  KC Current W
(18)  27  Seattle Reign W
(20)  43  Gotham FC W
(20)  36  Utah Royals W
(19)  36  Washington S. W

The Segments Table is a visual representation splitting the teams into 5 segments. Each team is assigned to a specific segment, depending on the team's number of points. Each of the 5 segments spans one-fifth (20%) of the total points held by the team ranked 1st in the league. For each team, the number of matches played appears in green between brackets, and the number of points is displayed in black.








Sat 15 Aug
LOU - BOS
Sun 16 Aug
POR - ORL
Mon 17 Aug
NCC - HOU
Mon 17 Aug
LA - WAS
Wed 19 Aug
LOU - RGN




League statistics

151 matches played / 240
62.9% completed
Home wins:  47%
Over 1.5 goals:  75%
Draws:  18%
Over 2.5 goals:  54%
Away wins:  35%
Over 3.5 goals:  26%
Goals:  402 Home goals per match:  1.48
Goals per match:  2.66 Away goals per match:  1.19
    Both teams scored:  50%

Results

 Latest results
 Matches by date
 Matches by Matchweek
 Results grid
 Results filter
 Outcome Surprise-Levels

Tables

 Home / Away tables
 Wide table
 Tables by Date
 Form tables
 Projected points

Analysis

 Goals statistics
 Points performance
 Over / Under
 Scored / Conceded
 Home advantage
 Relative form
 Run-in analysis

Goal times

 When goals were scored
 1st-half / 2nd-half
 First team to score
 Goal types
 Lead durations
 Points Won/Lost
Home team scored first: 45% No goal scored: 5% Away team scored first: 50%
Average minute when home team scored first: 31 min. Average minute when away team scored first: 26 min.
Home team lead-defending rate: 68% Away team lead-defending rate: 60%
Home team equalizing rate: 40% Away team equalizing rate: 32%
Home team lead duration: 27% Teams level in goals: 46% Away team lead duration: 28%
Home PPG when home team scored first: 2.65 Away PPG when away team scored first: 2.17

More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 151 matches played in the league, a total of 402 goals have been scored (2.66 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including the league results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded.

 

SoccerSTATS.com - Public edition

SoccerSTATS.com provides football statistics, results and blog articles on national and international soccer competitions worldwide. Football fans can keep a tab on stats related to their favourite team or leagues of interest, and access a wide range of team performance data analytics and league standings, not only on the world's most famous professional leagues, but also on amateur and regional leagues over the world. Example of soccer statistics include league standings, form tables, top goal scorers, scoring stats, statistical previews and goal timing statistics.
Follow us on Twitter
F.A.Q. Contact Privacy Policy Do Not Sell My Information
Terms & conditions of use About us Cookie usage and options Membership information
Mobile app
To our loyal users: PLEASE SUPPORT US

Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. Products, services, promotional offers and other offerings from partners and advertisers are subject to terms and conditions. By using this website you certify that you agree with the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy and that you are over the age of 18 or that you have the permission of a parent or guardian to use this website, after your parent or guardian has carefully reviewed and agreed to the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy. The website's content is provided for informational purposes only is not to be relied upon as a professional opinion whatsover. Nothing on this website should be considered as advice. This website is not associated with nor endorsed by any league or competition (whether professional, collegiate or other types of leagues / competitions), federation, association, club or team. All trademarks, brands, images, logos and names appearing on this website belong to their respective owners.
Useful links (third-party websites):   www.gamcare.org.uk       www.begambleaware.org        gamblingtherapy.org
 
   
Copyright 1998-2026 SoccerSTATS.com
back to top