back to top
LEAGUES MATCHES STATS FAV BLOG MEMBER LOGIN
usa6
USA - NWSL
LATEST MATCHES FORM H2H GOALS HALF-TIME TIMING FIRST GOAL FAVOURITE
🔍

Bay FC W vs Chicago RS W

advertisement


Visual table

  GP Pts
1  Gotham FC W 26 54
2  San Diego W. W 27 51
3  Washington S. W 26 46
4  Utah Royals W 27 46
5  KC Current W 27 44
6  Portland T. W 26 43
7  Angel City W 26 42
8  N. Carolina W 27 42
9  Seattle Reign W 27 40
10  Denver Summit W 26 35
11  Orlando Pride W 27 33
12  Houston Dash W 26 30
13  Boston Legacy W 26 26
14  Bay FC W 27 26
15  R. Louisville W 27 24
16  Chicago RS W 26 17

 
Sun 24 May 2026
Bay FC W0 1Chicago RS W
0:1 M. Swanson (70)






Seasonal streaks


2nd consecutive defeat for Bay FC W.
2nd consecutive game with no goal scored for Bay FC W.
3rd consecutive game where Bay FC W conceded.
2nd consecutive home game where Bay FC W conceded.
 

 
Lead durations in 90 minutes of regular time
090
Bay FC WLevel (70)Chicago RS W (20)
Lead durations tables
  How are the duration values calculated?⌄

To calculate the above duration values based on a total of 90 minutes, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are considered scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are considered scored on the 90th minute.


Outcome Surprise-Level

Points Per Game (before the match)
Bay FC W at home1.00
Chicago RS W away0.00
OutcomeOutcome surprise-level
Away win
66.7%
Scale: from 0 (less surprising) to 100 (more surprising)

Outcome Surprise-levels

More information on the calculation of the Outcome surprise-level is outlined in the following blog article:
Evaluating surprising results







 






 flag

Bay FC W

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 13 4 2 7  
  Away 14 3 3 8  
  Total 27 7 5 15  
PPG (Home): 1.08
PPG (Away): 0.86
PPG (Total): 0.96


Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game0.96 0.88 -8.3%
AVG Goals For1.04 1.00 -3.8%
AVG Goals Against1.56 1.88 +20.5%



Bay FC W's progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
14 Mar Bay FC W 2:1

1-0   A. Pfeiffer (8)

     1-1   K. Kössler (20)

2-1   Joelle Anderson (31)

Denver Summit W + - - 2-1
22 Mar Bay FC W 1:3

     0-1   S. Jónsdóttir (3)

     0-2   G. Thompson (32)

---------------------------------------
     0-3   S. Jónsdóttir (53)

1-3   Taylor Brooke Huff (56)
Angel City W + - - 0-2
28 Mar N. Carolina W 1:3

     0-1   A. Pfeiffer (20)

     0-2   Keira Kathleen Barry (30)

     0-3   Dorian Josey Bailey (34)

---------------------------------------
1-3   Manaka Matsukubo (65)
Bay FC W + - - 0-3
5 Apr Bay FC W 0:2

---------------------------------------
     0-1   B. Courtnall (o.g.) (57)

     0-2   Gift Nyakno Monday (86)
Washington S. W - - + 0-0
25 Apr Gotham FC W 3:0

1-0   Karlie Lema (o.g.) (20)

2-0   R. Lavelle (40)

3-0   E. Rodríguez (45) pen.

Bay FC W + - + 3-0
3 May San Diego W. W 0:1

     0-1   Racheal Kundananji (5)

Bay FC W - + - 0-1
10 May Bay FC W 0:0

Utah Royals W - + + 0-0
16 May Bay FC W 1:1

---------------------------------------
1-0   Dorian Josey Bailey (51)

     1-1   A. Santos (64) pen.
Boston Legacy W - - - 0-0
21 May Portland T. W 2:0

1-0   Mary Alice Vignola (30)

---------------------------------------
2-0   M. McKenzie (77)
Bay FC W - - + 1-0
24 May Bay FC W 0:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   M. Swanson (70)
Chicago RS W - - + 0-0
30 May Orlando Pride W 3:1

1-0   Barbra Banda (4)

     1-1   Caroline Noel Conti (7)

---------------------------------------
2-1   Barbra Banda (51)

3-1   C. Dyke (55)
Bay FC W + - - 1-1
5 Jul Boston Legacy W 2:2

     0-1   C. Hutton (5) pen.

     0-2   Karlie Lema (17)

1-2   A. Santos (45)

---------------------------------------
2-2   Aïssata Traoré (79) pen.
Bay FC W + - - 1-2
11 Jul R. Louisville W 0:2

     0-1   Kennedy Linh Fuller (21)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Karlie Lema (58)
Bay FC W - + - 0-1
18 Jul Bay FC W 3:0

1-0   Karlie Lema (15)

2-0   Karlie Lema (17)

---------------------------------------
3-0   Racheal Kundananji (54)
N. Carolina W + + - 2-0
25 Jul Houston Dash W 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   L. Ullmark (90)
Bay FC W - - + 0-0
30 Jul Bay FC W 0:1

     0-1   M. Williams-Purce (2)

Gotham FC W - - + 0-1
2 Aug Bay FC W 2:3

     0-1   Mia Renee Fishel (5)

     0-2   M. Dahlien (10)

1-2   Hannah Bebar (13)

---------------------------------------
2-2   Keira Kathleen Barry (75)

     2-3   J. Fishlock (85)
Seattle Reign W + - - 1-2
9 Aug Chicago RS W 0:0

Bay FC W - + + 0-0
15 Aug Utah Royals W 3:2

     0-1   Karlie Lema (6)

1-1   Miyabi Moriya (7)

2-1   Narumi Miura (22)

     2-2   H. Gilchrist (29)

---------------------------------------
3-2   Mina Tanaka (79) pen.
Bay FC W + - - 2-2
23 Aug Bay FC W 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Cristiana Girelli (89)
Houston Dash W - + - 0-0
30 Aug Washington S. W 1:0

1-0   P. Metayer (45)

Bay FC W - - + 1-0
5 Sep Bay FC W 1:2

     0-1   I. Rodriguez (11)

1-1   Karlie Lema (45)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   R. Cedeño (89)
KC Current W + - - 1-1
13 Sep Seattle Reign W 2:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   S. Huerta (51) pen.

2-0   B. Ratcliffe (90)
Bay FC W - - + 0-0
17 Sep Denver Summit W 2:2

1-0   Lindsey Horan (42)

---------------------------------------
2-0   J. Sonis (57)

     2-1   C. Hutton (73)

     2-2   Taylor Brooke Huff (90)
Bay FC W + - - 1-0
20 Sep Bay FC W 2:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   A. Pfeiffer (50)

2-0   Karlie Lema (56)
R. Louisville W - + - 0-0
27 Sep Bay FC W 1:3

     0-1   H. McCutcheon (2)

1-1   Racheal Kundananji (11)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   H. McCutcheon (47)

     1-3   L. Muñoz (90)
Orlando Pride W + - - 1-1
3 Oct KC Current W 5:1

     0-1   Karlie Lema (4)

1-1   H. Hopkins (24)

---------------------------------------
2-1   D. Oliveira (46)

3-1   D. Oliveira (53)

4-1   D. Oliveira (75)

5-1   Temwa Chawinga (89)
Bay FC W + - - 1-1



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
18 Oct Bay FC W vs Portland T. W 1.08 1.31
25 Oct Angel City W vs Bay FC W 1.38 0.86
1 Nov Bay FC W vs San Diego W. W 1.08 2.00
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.56

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins ---
Consecutive draws ---
Consecutive defeats 112
No win 172
No draw 813
No defeat ---
1 goal scored or more 524
1 goal conceded or more 152
No goal scored ---
No goal conceded ---
GF+GA over 2.5 122
GF+GA under 2.5 ---
Scored at least twice ---










Comparison with league average


Bay FC W (27 matches) vs league average

(overall)Bay FC W League AVG
Points per game  0.96 1.41
% Wins  26% 41%
% Draws  19% 17%
% Defeats  56% 41%
Goals scored per game  1.04 1.40
Goals conceded per game  1.56 1.40
% Clean sheets  26% 25%
% Failed To Score  37% 25%
% Won To Nil  19% 21%
% Lost To Nil  30% 21%
% Team scored first  41% 48%
% Opponent scored first  52% 48%
Average minute scored first  25 29
Average minute conceded first  31 29
Lead-defending rate  58% 63%
Equalizing rate  29% 37%
% Time leading  21% 27%
% Time level in goals  48% 46%
% Time trailing  31% 27%
PPG when scored first  2.09 2.38
PPG when conceded first  0.07 0.48
Total goals per game  2.59 2.80
% over 1.5 goals  70% 77%
% over 2.5 goals  48% 56%
% over 3.5 goals  33% 28%
% both teams scored  44% 53%

Bay FC W at home (13 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Bay FC W League AVG
Points per game  1.08 1.59
% Wins  31% 47%
% Draws  15% 17%
% Defeats  54% 35%
Goals scored per game  1.08 1.54
Goals conceded per game  1.31 1.26
% Clean sheets  31% 27%
% Failed To Score  31% 24%
% Won To Nil  23% 23%
% Lost To Nil  23% 19%
% Team scored first  38% 48%
% Opponent scored first  54% 48%
Average minute scored first  43 32
Average minute conceded first  21 26
Lead-defending rate  67% 67%
Equalizing rate  30% 41%
% Time leading  17% 28%
% Time level in goals  50% 46%
% Time trailing  33% 26%
PPG when scored first  2.60 2.57
PPG when conceded first  0.00 0.67
Total goals per game  2.38 2.80
% over 1.5 goals  69% 77%
% over 2.5 goals  46% 56%
% over 3.5 goals  23% 28%
% both teams scored  46% 53%

Bay FC W away (14 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Bay FC W League AVG
Points per game  0.86 1.24
% Wins  21% 35%
% Draws  21% 17%
% Defeats  57% 47%
Goals scored per game  1.00 1.26
Goals conceded per game  1.79 1.54
% Clean sheets  21% 24%
% Failed To Score  43% 27%
% Won To Nil  14% 19%
% Lost To Nil  36% 23%
% Team scored first  43% 48%
% Opponent scored first  50% 48%
Average minute scored first  10 26
Average minute conceded first  40 32
Lead-defending rate  50% 59%
Equalizing rate  27% 33%
% Time leading  25% 26%
% Time level in goals  46% 46%
% Time trailing  29% 28%
PPG when scored first  1.67 2.20
PPG when conceded first  0.14 0.29
Total goals per game  2.79 2.80
% over 1.5 goals  71% 77%
% over 2.5 goals  50% 56%
% over 3.5 goals  43% 28%
% both teams scored  43% 53%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Bay FC W
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 11 / 27 41%
  Opponent scored first 14 / 27 52%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 6 / 27 22%
  Opponent was leading at HT 7 / 27 26%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 19.2 min. 21%
  Average minutes level in goals 42.8 min. 48%
  Average minutes trailing 28.0 min. 31%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Bay FC W have been in the lead for an average duration of 19.2 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 28.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Bay FC W
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 27

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 12
  Equalizer goals conceded 5
  Lead defending rate * (1) 58%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 21
  Equalizer goals scored 6
  Equalizing rate * (2) 29%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 10
  Non-crucial goals conceded 16

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Bay FC W have taken the lead 12 times and have conceded an equalizer on 5 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 58% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 42%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 21 times that Bay FC W's opponents have taken the lead, Bay FC W have managed to score an equalizer on 6 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 29%.


 flag Bay FC W
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 5 / 13 38%
  Opponent scored first 7 / 13 54%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 2 / 13 15%
  Opponent was leading at HT 3 / 13 23%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 15.4 min. 17%
  Average minutes level in goals 44.6 min. 50%
  Average minutes trailing 30.0 min. 33%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Bay FC W have been in the lead for an average duration of 15.4 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 30.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Bay FC W
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 13

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 6
  Equalizer goals conceded 2
  Lead defending rate * (1) 67%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 10
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 30%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 5
  Non-crucial goals conceded 5

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Bay FC W have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 67% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 33%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 10 times that Bay FC W's opponents have taken the lead when Bay FC W were playing at home, Bay FC W have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 30%.



 flag Bay FC W
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 6 / 14 43%
  Opponent scored first 7 / 14 50%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 4 / 14 29%
  Opponent was leading at HT 4 / 14 29%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 22.8 min. 25%
  Average minutes level in goals 41.1 min. 46%
  Average minutes trailing 26.1 min. 29%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Bay FC W have been in the lead for an average duration of 22.8 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 26.1 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Bay FC W
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 14

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 6
  Equalizer goals conceded 3
  Lead defending rate * (1) 50%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 11
  Equalizer goals scored 3
  Equalizing rate * (2) 27%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 5
  Non-crucial goals conceded 11

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Bay FC W have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 50% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 50%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 11 times that Bay FC W's opponents have taken the lead when Bay FC W were playing away, Bay FC W have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 27%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Gotham FC W 26 54 0:1 3:0 h2h
2 San Diego W. W 27 51 1 Nov 0:1 h2h
3 Washington S. W 26 46 0:2 1:0 h2h
4 Utah Royals W 27 46 0:0 3:2 h2h
5 KC Current W 27 44 1:2 5:1 h2h
6 Portland T. W 26 43 18 Oct 2:0 h2h
7 Angel City W 26 42 1:3 25 Oct h2h
8 N. Carolina W 27 42 3:0 1:3 h2h
9 Seattle Reign W 27 40 2:3 2:0 h2h
10 Denver Summit W 26 35 2:1 2:2 h2h
11 Orlando Pride W 27 33 1:3 3:1 h2h
12 Houston Dash W 26 30 1:0 1:0 h2h
13 Boston Legacy W 26 26 1:1 2:2 h2h
14 Bay FC W 27 26
15 R. Louisville W 27 24 2:0 0:2 h2h
16 Chicago RS W 26 17 0:1 0:0 h2h








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 14 1428
GF per match 1.081.00 1.04
Goals conceded (GA) 172542
GA per match 1.311.79 1.56
GF + GA per match 2.382.792.59
GF+GA over 0.5 92%93%93%
GF+GA over 1.5 69%71%70%
GF+GA over 2.5 46%50%48%
GF+GA over 3.5 23%43%33%
GF+GA over 4.5 8%14%11%
GF+GA over 5.5 0%7%4%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 54%79%67%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 46%43%44%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 15%29%22%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 31%21%26%
Won-to-nil 23%14%19%
Failed to score 31%43%37%
Lost-to-nil 23%36%30%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 69%57%63%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 38%50%44%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 46%14%30%
Scored in both halves 15%7%11%
Both teams scored 46%43%44%
Conceding Rate 69%79%74%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 46%57%52%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 54%64%59%
Conceded in both halves 31%43%37%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 69%57%63%
GF over 1.5 31%36%33%
GF over 2.5 8%7%7%
GF over 3.5 0%0%0%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 69%79%74%
GA over 1.5 38%57%48%
GA over 2.5 23%29%26%
GA over 3.5 0%7%4%
GA over 4.5 0%7%4%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Bay FC W matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 8%7%7%
Match total goals = 1 23%21%22%
Match total goals = 2 23%21%22%
Match total goals = 3 23%7%15%
Match total goals = 4 15%29%22%
Match total goals = 5+ 8%14%11%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 31%29%30%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 46%29%37%
Match total goals = 4+ 23%43%33%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  21 10
Away wins  12 00
Home & Away wins  33 10
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  43 00
Away defeats  33 11
Home & Away defeats  76 11

A majority of Bay FC W's wins have been obtained with a margin of 2 goals or more (4 wins), while 3 of their wins had a one-goal margin.

A majority of Bay FC W's defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (8 defeats), while 7 of their defeats had a one-goal margin.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 54%
46%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.08
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)0.86
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 50%
50%
  % Goals conceded 40%
60%
  League average 55%
45%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 24 6  22%
Drawing at HT 86 14  52%
Losing at HT 34 7  26%
  Total 131427







Goal times


 flag Bay FC W
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 9
GA 8
16-30 GF 6
GA 5
31-45 GF 3
GA 6
46-60 GF 6
GA 9
61-75 GF 2
GA 4
76-90 GF 2
GA 10
1st Half GF 18
64%
GA 19
45%
2nd Half GF 10
36%
GA 23
55%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 35
 Avg. minute goals conceded 48


  Bay FC W
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 4
GA 6
16-30 GF 1
GA 1
31-45 GF 2
GA 1
46-60 GF 5
GA 3
61-75 GF 1
GA 2
76-90 GF 1
GA 4
1st Half GF 7
50%
GA 8
47%
2nd Half GF 7
50%
GA 9
53%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 41
  Avg. minute goals conceded 43


  Bay FC W
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 5
GA 2
16-30 GF 5
GA 4
31-45 GF 1
GA 5
46-60 GF 1
GA 6
61-75 GF 1
GA 2
76-90 GF 1
GA 6
1st Half GF 11
79%
GA 11
44%
2nd Half GF 3
21%
GA 14
56%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 28
  Avg. minute goals conceded 51








Bay FC W scores

FT at home
1-3 2 15%
0-1 2 15%
2-3 1 8%
1-2 1 8%
0-2 1 8%
2-1 1 8%
1-1 1 8%
3-0 1 8%
2-0 1 8%
1-0 1 8%
0-0 1 8%
FT away
2-2 2 14%
2-0 2 14%
1-0 2 14%
5-1 1 7%
1-3 1 7%
3-2 1 7%
0-2 1 7%
3-1 1 7%
0-1 1 7%
3-0 1 7%
0-0 1 7%

Half-time at home
0-0 6 46%
1-1 2 15%
1-2 1 8%
0-2 1 8%
2-1 1 8%
0-1 1 8%
2-0 1 8%
Half-time away
1-0 3 21%
0-0 3 21%
1-1 2 14%
0-1 2 14%
0-3 1 7%
2-2 1 7%
1-2 1 7%
3-0 1 7%





This season in the league

Bay FC W have lost their last 2 matches.
Bay FC W failed to keep a clean sheet in 9 of their 13 home matches.
Bay FC W failed to keep a clean sheet in 11 of their 14 away matches.
Bay FC W have scored 64% of their goals in the first half.
Bay FC W have lost 7 of their 13 home matches.
Bay FC W have failed to win in their last 7 away matches.
Bay FC W have scored 32% of their goals in the first 15 minutes.

View comments for all teams



 flag

Chicago Red Stars W

(this season in the league)


Seasonal match statistics

GP W D L  
  Home 12 4 1 7  
  Away 14 1 1 12  
  Total 26 5 2 19  
PPG (Home): 1.08
PPG (Away): 0.29
PPG (Total): 0.65


Relative form

AllLast 8 Diff.
Points per Game0.65 0.50 -23.1%
AVG Goals For0.58 0.75 +29.3%
AVG Goals Against2.31 3.38 +46.3%



Chicago RS W's progression (home & away)

Line graph variation:   win:+2  draw:0  defeat:-1
 




Results

2.5+ CS FTS HT
15 Mar Angel City W 4:0

1-0   Kennedy Linh Fuller (33)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Evelyn Shores (53)

3-0   A. Borges (66)

4-0   M. Niehues (70)
Chicago RS W + - + 1-0
22 Mar Chicago RS W 2:1

1-0   Tessa Dellarose (42)

---------------------------------------
2-0   J. Huitema (50)

     2-1   H. Hopkins (57)
KC Current W + - - 1-0
26 Mar Chicago RS W 0:3

     0-1   Barbra Banda (13)

     0-2   L. Muñoz (22)

     0-3   H. Anderson (35)

Orlando Pride W + - + 0-3
29 Mar San Diego W. W 2:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Lia Eugenia Godfrey (56)

2-0   M. Barcenas (72)
Chicago RS W - - + 0-0
4 Apr Utah Royals W 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Mina Tanaka (74) pen.
Chicago RS W - - + 0-0
25 Apr Chicago RS W 2:0

1-0   J. Huitema (10)

---------------------------------------
2-0   N. Coelho (51)
Boston Legacy W - + - 1-0
30 Apr Chicago RS W 0:2

     0-1   Jordynn Araya Dudley (1)

     0-2   R. Lavelle (10)

Gotham FC W - - + 0-2
3 May Chicago RS W 0:2

     0-1   Olivia Lynn Moultrie (17)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Reilyn Sky Turner (89)
Portland T. W - - + 0-1
10 May KC Current W 3:0

1-0   Temwa Chawinga (22)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Temwa Chawinga (47)

3-0   Temwa Chawinga (49)
Chicago RS W + - + 1-0
16 May N. Carolina W 4:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Evelyn Ijeh (47)

2-0   A. Sanchez (61)

3-0   A. Schlegel (65)

4-0   Manaka Matsukubo (86)
Chicago RS W + - + 0-0
24 May Bay FC W 0:1

---------------------------------------
     0-1   M. Swanson (70)
Chicago RS W - + - 0-0
31 May Chicago RS W 0:2

     0-1   M. Silva (3)

---------------------------------------
     0-2   Trinity Paula Byars (90)
San Diego W. W - - + 0-1
5 Jul Chicago RS W 3:2

1-0   J. Huitema (20)

     1-1   C. Lacasse (43)

---------------------------------------
     1-2   Cecelia Anne Delzer (54) pen.

2-2   Samantha Keala Staab (59)

3-2   J. Huitema (86)
Utah Royals W + - - 1-1
11 Jul Boston Legacy W 2:0

1-0   A. Santos (22) pen.

---------------------------------------
2-0   N. Prince (58)
Chicago RS W - - + 1-0
18 Jul Chicago RS W 0:2

---------------------------------------
     0-1   M. Niehues (56) pen.

     0-2   S. Jónsdóttir (90)
Angel City W - - + 0-0
25 Jul Orlando Pride W 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Julie Kate Doyle (88)
Chicago RS W - - + 0-0
1 Aug R. Louisville W 2:1

---------------------------------------
1-0   Mirann Gacioch (55)

2-0   Kayla Fischer (62)

     2-1   N. Coelho (80)
Chicago RS W + - - 0-0
9 Aug Chicago RS W 0:0

Bay FC W - + + 0-0
15 Aug Seattle Reign W 1:0

---------------------------------------
1-0   Madison Mercado (53)
Chicago RS W - - + 0-0
20 Aug Houston Dash W 5:0

1-0   Katherine Ann Rader (5)

2-0   Katherine Ann Rader (42)

3-0   L. Ullmark (45)

---------------------------------------
4-0   Kate Faasse (79)

5-0   Lisa Boattin (90)
Chicago RS W + - + 3-0
23 Aug Chicago RS W 3:2

1-0   Jameese Joseph (34)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Taylor Jacklyn Flint (49)

2-1   M. Swanson (62)

     2-2   M. Morris (68)

3-2   Julia Angela Grosso (83)
R. Louisville W + - - 1-0
30 Aug Denver Summit W 6:1

1-0   J. Sonis (13)

2-0   K. Kössler (19)

---------------------------------------
3-0   Yuzuki Yamamoto (47)

     3-1   Julia Angela Grosso (53)

4-1   Natasha Jane Flint (56)

5-1   K. Kössler (58)

6-1   Olivia Hylton Thomas (85)
Chicago RS W + - - 2-0
6 Sep Chicago RS W 0:6

     0-1   A. Sanchez (11)

     0-2   Chioma Okafor (17)

---------------------------------------
     0-3   Shinomi Koyama (61)

     0-4   Ryan Emilie Williams (63)

     0-5   A. Sanchez (69) pen.

     0-6   A. Sanchez (81)
N. Carolina W + - + 0-2
13 Sep Portland T. W 1:1

1-0   Maitane López Millán (o.g.) (22)

---------------------------------------
     1-1   Taylor Wood (90)
Chicago RS W - - - 1-0
20 Sep Chicago RS W 0:3

     0-1   T. Moyer-Rodman (7)

     0-2   A. Sullivan (34) pen.

---------------------------------------
     0-3   T. Carmo (85)
Washington S. W + - + 0-2
26 Sep Gotham FC W 3:1

1-0   Jaedyn Reese Shaw (9)

---------------------------------------
2-0   Samantha May Kerr (50)

3-0   Jaedyn Reese Shaw (66)

     3-1   T. Dellarose (87)
Chicago RS W + - - 1-0



Points Per Game
Home Away Opponent
4 Oct Chicago RS W vs Denver Summit W 1.08 1.00
18 Oct Chicago RS W vs Seattle Reign W 1.08 1.08
24 Oct Chicago RS W vs Houston Dash W 1.08 0.86
1 Nov Washington S. W vs Chicago RS W 1.46 0.29
Average of Opponent PPG values above 1.10

The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team.
 
Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes.








Current Streaks & Sequences

CURRENT SEQUENCES Home Away Total
Consecutive wins ---
Consecutive draws ---
Consecutive defeats 212
No win 285
No draw 312
No defeat ---
1 goal scored or more -31
1 goal conceded or more 388
No goal scored 2--
No goal conceded ---
GF+GA over 2.5 312
GF+GA under 2.5 ---
Scored at least twice ---










Comparison with league average


Chicago RS W (26 matches) vs league average

(overall)Chicago RS W League AVG
Points per game  0.65 1.41
% Wins  19% 41%
% Draws  8% 17%
% Defeats  73% 41%
Goals scored per game  0.58 1.40
Goals conceded per game  2.31 1.40
% Clean sheets  12% 25%
% Failed To Score  65% 25%
% Won To Nil  8% 21%
% Lost To Nil  62% 21%
% Team scored first  19% 48%
% Opponent scored first  77% 48%
Average minute scored first  35 29
Average minute conceded first  30 29
Lead-defending rate  62% 63%
Equalizing rate  10% 37%
% Time leading  9% 27%
% Time level in goals  40% 46%
% Time trailing  51% 27%
PPG when scored first  3.00 2.38
PPG when conceded first  0.05 0.48
Total goals per game  2.88 2.80
% over 1.5 goals  81% 77%
% over 2.5 goals  50% 56%
% over 3.5 goals  31% 28%
% both teams scored  27% 53%

Chicago RS W at home (12 matches) vs league average at home

(home matches)Chicago RS W League AVG
Points per game  1.08 1.59
% Wins  33% 47%
% Draws  8% 17%
% Defeats  58% 35%
Goals scored per game  0.83 1.54
Goals conceded per game  2.08 1.26
% Clean sheets  17% 27%
% Failed To Score  67% 24%
% Won To Nil  8% 23%
% Lost To Nil  58% 19%
% Team scored first  33% 48%
% Opponent scored first  58% 48%
Average minute scored first  26 32
Average minute conceded first  15 26
Lead-defending rate  57% 67%
Equalizing rate  12% 41%
% Time leading  17% 28%
% Time level in goals  34% 46%
% Time trailing  49% 26%
PPG when scored first  3.00 2.57
PPG when conceded first  0.00 0.67
Total goals per game  2.92 2.80
% over 1.5 goals  92% 77%
% over 2.5 goals  50% 56%
% over 3.5 goals  25% 28%
% both teams scored  25% 53%

Chicago RS W away (14 matches) vs league average away

(away matches)Chicago RS W League AVG
Points per game  0.29 1.24
% Wins  7% 35%
% Draws  7% 17%
% Defeats  86% 47%
Goals scored per game  0.36 1.26
Goals conceded per game  2.50 1.54
% Clean sheets  7% 24%
% Failed To Score  64% 27%
% Won To Nil  7% 19%
% Lost To Nil  64% 23%
% Team scored first  7% 48%
% Opponent scored first  93% 48%
Average minute scored first  70 26
Average minute conceded first  38 32
Lead-defending rate  100% 59%
Equalizing rate  8% 33%
% Time leading  2% 26%
% Time level in goals  45% 46%
% Time trailing  53% 28%
PPG when scored first  3.00 2.20
PPG when conceded first  0.08 0.29
Total goals per game  2.86 2.80
% over 1.5 goals  71% 77%
% over 2.5 goals  50% 56%
% over 3.5 goals  36% 28%
% both teams scored  29% 53%
The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season.








First goal, leading & trailing


 flag Chicago RS W
 Leading & trailing (total)  

  OPENING GOALS (total) Matches
  Team scored first 5 / 26 19%
  Opponent scored first 20 / 26 77%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (total) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 3 / 26 12%
  Opponent was leading at HT 13 / 26 50%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) per match
  Average minutes leading 7.8 min. 9%
  Average minutes level in goals 36.1 min. 40%
  Average minutes trailing 46.1 min. 51%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Chicago Red Stars W have been in the lead for an average duration of 7.8 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 46.1 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Chicago RS W
 Equalizer goals (total)  

  Matches played 26

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (total)
  Goals giving the lead 8
  Equalizer goals conceded 3
  Lead defending rate * (1) 62%

  EQUALIZING (total)
  goals giving lead to opponent 21
  Equalizer goals scored 2
  Equalizing rate * (2) 10%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total)
  Non-crucial goals scored 5
  Non-crucial goals conceded 36

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability
Chicago Red Stars W have taken the lead 8 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 62% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 38%).

Equalizing ability
Of the 21 times that Chicago RS W's opponents have taken the lead, Chicago RS W have managed to score an equalizer on 2 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 10%.


 flag Chicago RS W
 Leading & trailing (home)  

  OPENING GOALS (home) Matches
  Team scored first 4 / 12 33%
  Opponent scored first 7 / 12 58%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (home) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 3 / 12 25%
  Opponent was leading at HT 6 / 12 50%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) per match
  Average minutes leading 15.3 min. 17%
  Average minutes level in goals 30.8 min. 34%
  Average minutes trailing 43.9 min. 49%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Chicago RS W have been in the lead for an average duration of 15.3 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 43.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Chicago RS W
 Equalizer goals (home)  

  Matches played 12

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (home)
  Goals giving the lead 7
  Equalizer goals conceded 3
  Lead defending rate * (1) 57%

  EQUALIZING (home)
  goals giving lead to opponent 8
  Equalizer goals scored 1
  Equalizing rate * (2) 12%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home)
  Non-crucial goals scored 2
  Non-crucial goals conceded 14

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Chicago RS W have taken the lead 7 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 57% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 43%).

Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 8 times that Chicago RS W's opponents have taken the lead when Chicago RS W were playing at home, Chicago RS W have managed to score an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a home equalizing rate of 12%.



 flag Chicago RS W
 Leading & trailing (away)  

  OPENING GOALS (away) Matches
  Team scored first 1 / 14 7%
  Opponent scored first 13 / 14 93%

  HALF-TIME LEAD (away) Matches
  Team was leading at HT 0 / 14 0%
  Opponent was leading at HT 7 / 14 50%

  AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) per match
  Average minutes leading 1.4 min. 2%
  Average minutes level in goals 40.6 min. 45%
  Average minutes trailing 47.9 min. 53%
Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute.
In this example, Chicago RS W have been in the lead for an average duration of 1.4 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 47.9 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches.


 flag Chicago RS W
 Equalizer goals (away)  

  Matches played 14

  DEFENDING THE LEAD (away)
  Goals giving the lead 1
  Equalizer goals conceded 0
  Lead defending rate * (1) 100%

  EQUALIZING (away)
  goals giving lead to opponent 13
  Equalizer goals scored 1
  Equalizing rate * (2) 8%

  NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away)
  Non-crucial goals scored 3
  Non-crucial goals conceded 22

(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100

Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.

Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.

Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match, so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.

Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Chicago RS W have taken the lead 1 time and have conceded an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 100% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 0%).

Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 13 times that Chicago RS W's opponents have taken the lead when Chicago RS W were playing away, Chicago RS W have managed to score an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away equalizing rate of 8%.


Results table

  GP Pts Home Away
1 Gotham FC W 26 54 0:2 3:1 h2h
2 San Diego W. W 27 51 0:2 2:0 h2h
3 Washington S. W 26 46 0:3 1 Nov h2h
4 Utah Royals W 27 46 3:2 1:0 h2h
5 KC Current W 27 44 2:1 3:0 h2h
6 Portland T. W 26 43 0:2 1:1 h2h
7 Angel City W 26 42 0:2 4:0 h2h
8 N. Carolina W 27 42 0:6 4:0 h2h
9 Seattle Reign W 27 40 18 Oct 1:0 h2h
10 Denver Summit W 26 35 4 Oct 6:1 h2h
11 Orlando Pride W 27 33 0:3 1:0 h2h
12 Houston Dash W 26 30 24 Oct 5:0 h2h
13 Boston Legacy W 26 26 2:0 2:0 h2h
14 Bay FC W 27 26 0:0 0:1 h2h
15 R. Louisville W 27 24 3:2 2:1 h2h
16 Chicago RS W 26 17








Goals scored & conceded

SCORING Home Away All
Goals scored (GF) 10 515
GF per match 0.830.36 0.58
Goals conceded (GA) 253560
GA per match 2.082.50 2.31
GF + GA per match 2.922.862.88
GF+GA over 0.5 92%100%96%
GF+GA over 1.5 92%71%81%
GF+GA over 2.5 50%50%50%
GF+GA over 3.5 25%36%31%
GF+GA over 4.5 25%14%19%
GF+GA over 5.5 8%7%8%
GF+GA over 0.5 at HT 83%50%65%
GF+GA over 1.5 at HT 42%14%27%
GF+GA over 2.5 at HT 8%7%8%








No goal scored / conceded

Home Away All
Clean sheets 17%7%12%
Won-to-nil 8%7%8%
Failed to score 67%64%65%
Lost-to-nil 58%64%62%








Scoring & Conceding rates

Home Away All
Scoring Rate 33%36%35%
Scoring Rate 1st-H. 33%0%15%
Scoring Rate 2nd-H. 33%36%35%
Scored in both halves 33%0%15%
Both teams scored 25%29%27%
Conceding Rate 83%93%88%
Conceding Rate 1st-Half 58%50%54%
Conceding Rate 2nd-Half 67%86%77%
Conceded in both halves 42%43%42%

Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal








Goals scored / Goals conceded

Home Away All
GF over 0.5 33%36%35%
GF over 1.5 33%0%15%
GF over 2.5 17%0%8%
GF over 3.5 0%0%0%
GF over 4.5 0%0%0%
GA over 0.5 83%93%88%
GA over 1.5 75%64%69%
GA over 2.5 25%43%35%
GA over 3.5 8%29%19%
GA over 4.5 8%14%12%

GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded









Total goals in Chicago RS W matches

SCORED + CONCEDED Home Away All
Match total goals = 0 8%0%4%
Match total goals = 1 0%29%15%
Match total goals = 2 42%21%31%
Match total goals = 3 25%14%19%
Match total goals = 4 0%21%12%
Match total goals = 5+ 25%14%19%
Match total goals = 0 or 1 8%29%19%
Match total goals = 2 or 3 67%36%50%
Match total goals = 4+ 25%36%31%








Goal margins

WINNING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home wins  31 00
Away wins  10 00
Home & Away wins  41 00
LOSING MARGINS  1  2   3  4+ 
Home defeats  04 21
Away defeats  43 14
Home & Away defeats  47 35

A majority of Chicago RS W's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (4 wins), while 1 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more.

A majority of Chicago RS W's defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (15 defeats), while 4 of their defeats had a one-goal margin.









Home vs Away comparisons

Home / Away points Home Away
  % Points 76%
24%




Home / Away PPG
 Points Per Game at Home (PPGH)1.08
 Points Per Game Away (PPGA)0.29
Home / Away goals Home Away
  % Goals scored 67%
33%
  % Goals conceded 42%
58%
  League average 55%
45%







Half-time lead

Half-time Home Away Total
Leading at HT 30 3  12%
Drawing at HT 37 10  38%
Losing at HT 67 13  50%
  Total 121426







Goal times


 flag Chicago RS W
(this season in the league) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total)
0-15 GF 1
GA 9
16-30 GF 1
GA 7
31-45 GF 2
GA 6
46-60 GF 4
GA 16
61-75 GF 2
GA 12
76-90 GF 5
GA 10
1st Half GF 4
27%
GA 22
37%
2nd Half GF 11
73%
GA 38
63%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (total)       
 Avg. minute goals scored 58
 Avg. minute goals conceded 49


  Chicago RS W
(this season in the league, home matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home)
0-15 GF 1
GA 6
16-30 GF 1
GA 3
31-45 GF 2
GA 3
46-60 GF 3
GA 4
61-75 GF 1
GA 4
76-90 GF 2
GA 5
1st Half GF 4
40%
GA 12
48%
2nd Half GF 6
60%
GA 13
52%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (home)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 50
  Avg. minute goals conceded 45


  Chicago RS W
(this season in the league, away matches) 
GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away)
0-15 GF 0
GA 3
16-30 GF 0
GA 4
31-45 GF 0
GA 3
46-60 GF 1
GA 12
61-75 GF 1
GA 8
76-90 GF 3
GA 5
1st Half GF 0
0%
GA 10
29%
2nd Half GF 5
100%
GA 25
71%

'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded


  AVERAGE MINUTES (away)       
  Avg. minute goals scored 76
  Avg. minute goals conceded 52








Chicago RS W scores

FT at home
0-2 4 33%
0-3 2 17%
3-2 2 17%
0-6 1 8%
2-1 1 8%
2-0 1 8%
0-0 1 8%
FT away
1-0 3 21%
4-0 2 14%
2-0 2 14%
6-1 1 7%
5-0 1 7%
3-1 1 7%
2-1 1 7%
1-1 1 7%
0-1 1 7%
3-0 1 7%
The Chicago RS W score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 0-2 so far (4 times). The Chicago RS W score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-0 so far (3 times).
Half-time at home
0-2 3 25%
1-0 3 25%
0-1 2 17%
0-0 2 17%
0-3 1 8%
1-1 1 8%
Half-time away
0-0 7 50%
1-0 5 36%
3-0 1 7%
2-0 1 7%





This season in the league

Chicago RS W have lost their last 2 matches.
Chicago RS W have failed to win in their last 5 matches.
Chicago RS W failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 8 matches.
Chicago RS W failed to keep a clean sheet in 10 of their 12 home matches.
Chicago RS W have failed to score in 8 of their 12 home matches.
Chicago RS W failed to keep a clean sheet in 13 of their 14 away matches.
76% of Chicago RS W's points have been earned at home.
Chicago RS W have scored 67% of their goals at home.
73% of Chicago RS W's goals have been scored in the second half.
Chicago RS W have conceded the opening goal in 20 of their 26 matches.
Chicago RS W were losing at half-time in 13 of their 26 matches.
Chicago RS W have lost 19 of their 26 matches.
Chicago RS W have lost 7 of their 12 home matches.
Chicago RS W have lost 12 of their 14 away matches.
Chicago RS W have lost their last 2 home matches.
Chicago RS W have failed to win in their last 8 away matches.
Chicago RS W have failed to score in their last 2 home matches.
Chicago RS W failed to keep a clean sheet in each of their last 8 away matches.
Chicago RS W have conceded a minimum of 2 goals in each of their last 3 home matches.
Chicago RS W have scored 33% of their goals after the 75th minute.

View comments for all teams















Tables overview

Points

GP pts
Gotham FC W 26 54
San Diego W.. 27 51
Washington S. 26 46
Utah Royals W 27 46
KC Current W 27 44
Portland T. W 26 43
Angel City W 26 42
N. Carolina W 27 42
Seattle Reig. 27 40
Denver Summi. 26 35
Orlando Prid. 27 33
Houston Dash. 26 30
Boston Legac. 26 26
Bay FC W 27 26
R. Louisvill. 27 24
Chicago RS W 26 17

Form (last 8)

GP pts
San Diego W.. 8 19
Angel City W 8 17
Gotham FC W 8 17
Portland T. W 8 15
KC Current W 8 14
Seattle Reig. 8 13
Utah Royals W 8 13
N. Carolina W 8 12
Denver Summi. 8 12
Houston Dash. 8 10
Orlando Prid. 8 10
Washington S. 8 10
Bay FC W 8 7
Boston Legac. 8 6
R. Louisvill. 8 4
Chicago RS W 8 4

Home

GP pts
KC Current W 14 34
Gotham FC W 13 28
Portland T. W 13 26
Seattle Reig. 14 26
San Diego W.. 14 25
Utah Royals W 13 24
Denver Summi. 13 22
N. Carolina W 13 19
Washington S. 13 19
Orlando Prid. 14 19
Angel City W 13 18
Houston Dash. 12 18
R. Louisvill. 14 18
Bay FC W 13 14
Boston Legac. 14 14
Chicago RS W 12 13

Away

GP pts
Washington S. 13 27
San Diego W.. 13 26
Gotham FC W 13 26
Angel City W 13 24
N. Carolina W 14 23
Utah Royals W 14 22
Portland T. W 13 17
Seattle Reig. 13 14
Orlando Prid. 13 14
Denver Summi. 13 13
Boston Legac. 12 12
Houston Dash. 14 12
Bay FC W 14 12
KC Current W 13 10
R. Louisvill. 13 6
Chicago RS W 14 4

Offence

GP GF
N. Carolina W 27 50
KC Current W 27 48
Angel City W 26 44
Utah Royals W 27 44
Portland T. W 26 43
Denver Summi. 26 42
San Diego W.. 27 40
Orlando Prid. 27 36
R. Louisvill. 27 36
Washington S. 26 36
Gotham FC W 26 34
Seattle Reig. 27 33
Boston Legac. 26 32
Houston Dash. 26 32
Bay FC W 27 28
Chicago RS W 26 15

Defence

GP GA
Gotham FC W 26 20
Washington S. 26 24
San Diego W.. 27 28
Angel City W 26 28
Seattle Reig. 27 32
Utah Royals W 27 35
Portland T. W 26 35
Houston Dash. 26 36
Denver Summi. 26 37
KC Current W 27 38
N. Carolina W 27 39
Bay FC W 27 42
Orlando Prid. 27 43
Boston Legac. 26 44
R. Louisvill. 27 52
Chicago RS W 26 60

Offence (last 8)

GP GF
Denver Summi. 8 18
KC Current W 8 18
Angel City W 8 17
N. Carolina W 8 16
San Diego W.. 8 16
Portland T. W 8 15
Boston Legac. 8 13
Orlando Prid. 8 13
Houston Dash. 8 12
Utah Royals W 8 12
Gotham FC W 8 11
Washington S. 8 10
Seattle Reig. 8 9
Bay FC W 8 8
R. Louisvill. 8 8
Chicago RS W 8 6

Defence (last 8)

GP GA
Seattle Reig. 8 7
San Diego W.. 8 8
Gotham FC W 8 8
Angel City W 8 8
Portland T. W 8 10
N. Carolina W 8 10
Houston Dash. 8 10
Washington S. 8 11
KC Current W 8 12
Denver Summi. 8 13
Utah Royals W 8 14
Orlando Prid. 8 14
Bay FC W 8 15
R. Louisvill. 8 16
Boston Legac. 8 20
Chicago RS W 8 27

Offence (home)

GP GF
KC Current W 14 37
N. Carolina W 13 26
Denver Summi. 13 25
Portland T. W 13 22
Angel City W 13 21
Boston Legac. 14 21
Orlando Prid. 14 21
San Diego W.. 14 21
Utah Royals W 13 21
R. Louisvill. 14 20
Houston Dash. 12 19
Gotham FC W 13 17
Seattle Reig. 14 16
Washington S. 13 15
Bay FC W 13 14
Chicago RS W 12 10

Defence (home)

GP GA
Gotham FC W 13 8
Portland T. W 13 9
Seattle Reig. 14 10
Washington S. 13 14
KC Current W 14 14
Houston Dash. 12 14
San Diego W.. 14 15
Angel City W 13 16
Utah Royals W 13 17
Bay FC W 13 17
Denver Summi. 13 18
R. Louisvill. 14 21
N. Carolina W 13 21
Orlando Prid. 14 22
Chicago RS W 12 25
Boston Legac. 14 26

Offence (away)

GP GF
N. Carolina W 14 24
Angel City W 13 23
Utah Royals W 14 23
Portland T. W 13 21
Washington S. 13 21
San Diego W.. 13 19
Denver Summi. 13 17
Gotham FC W 13 17
Seattle Reig. 13 17
R. Louisvill. 13 16
Orlando Prid. 13 15
Bay FC W 14 14
Houston Dash. 14 13
Boston Legac. 12 11
KC Current W 13 11
Chicago RS W 14 5

Defence (away)

GP GA
Washington S. 13 10
Gotham FC W 13 12
Angel City W 13 12
San Diego W.. 13 13
Utah Royals W 14 18
N. Carolina W 14 18
Boston Legac. 12 18
Denver Summi. 13 19
Orlando Prid. 13 21
Seattle Reig. 13 22
Houston Dash. 14 22
KC Current W 13 24
Bay FC W 14 25
Portland T. W 13 26
R. Louisvill. 13 31
Chicago RS W 14 35






Total Match Goals stats


Match total goals stats

Teams GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
N. Carolina W  27 3.30 96% 85% 74% 41% 22% 7% 59% 30% 15% 26% 11%
R. Louisville W  27 3.26 100% 89% 67% 37% 22% 7% 70% 0% 30% 0% 30%
KC Current W  27 3.19 100% 93% 74% 30% 15% 7% 63% 15% 22% 15% 22%
Denver Summit W  26 3.04 92% 81% 62% 35% 23% 8% 65% 19% 23% 12% 15%
Portland T. W  26 3.00 96% 88% 54% 38% 12% 8% 62% 35% 8% 31% 4%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats


Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)

Last 8 matches of... GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Boston Legacy W  8 4.13 100% 100% 88% 38% 38% 25% 75% 12% 12% 12% 12%
Chicago RS W  8 4.13 100% 88% 75% 62% 50% 25% 50% 0% 50% 0% 50%
Denver Summit W  8 3.88 100% 88% 75% 50% 38% 25% 75% 12% 12% 12% 12%
KC Current W  8 3.75 100% 100% 75% 50% 38% 12% 88% 0% 12% 0% 12%
Orlando Pride W  8 3.38 100% 88% 88% 50% 12% 0% 88% 12% 0% 12% 0%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)


Match total goals stats (at home)

Teams (at home) GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
KC Current W  14 3.64 100% 93% 79% 50% 29% 14% 79% 21% 0% 21% 0%
N. Carolina W  13 3.62 100% 100% 85% 54% 23% 0% 69% 23% 8% 23% 8%
Boston Legacy W  14 3.36 100% 79% 71% 36% 21% 14% 71% 14% 14% 14% 14%
Denver Summit W  13 3.31 92% 92% 77% 38% 15% 8% 69% 15% 23% 8% 15%
Orlando Pride W  14 3.07 100% 79% 71% 36% 14% 7% 71% 21% 7% 21% 7%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats (at home)


Match total goals stats (away)

Teams (away) GP Avg 0.5+ 1.5+ 2.5+ 3.5+ 4.5+ 5.5+ BTS CS FTS WTN LTN
Portland T. W  13 3.62 100% 92% 69% 54% 23% 15% 77% 15% 8% 15% 8%
R. Louisville W  13 3.62 100% 85% 77% 46% 31% 15% 69% 0% 31% 0% 31%
N. Carolina W  14 3.00 93% 71% 64% 29% 21% 14% 50% 36% 21% 29% 14%
Seattle Reign W  13 3.00 92% 92% 69% 31% 15% 0% 77% 15% 15% 8% 8%
Utah Royals W  14 2.93 93% 79% 64% 29% 21% 7% 71% 29% 7% 21% 0%
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS

The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.

Match total goals stats (away)

Example
0.5+: matches where the total number of goals (team goals + opponent goals) was over 0.5





Segments Table

0 pt Segments table progression arrow 54 pts
5th Segment 4th Segment 3rd Segment 2nd Segment 1st Segment
up to 10.4 pts from 10.5 to 21.3 pts from 21.4 to 32.2 pts from 32.3 to 43.1 pts from 43.2 to 54 pts
(26)  17  Chicago RS W (26)  30  Houston Dash W
(26)  26  Boston Legacy W
(27)  26  Bay FC W
(27)  24  R. Louisville W
(26)  43  Portland T. W
(26)  42  Angel City W
(27)  42  N. Carolina W
(27)  40  Seattle Reign W
(26)  35  Denver Summit W
(27)  33  Orlando Pride W
(26)  54  Gotham FC W
(27)  51  San Diego W. W
(26)  46  Washington S. W
(27)  46  Utah Royals W
(27)  44  KC Current W

The Segments Table is a visual representation splitting the teams into 5 segments. Each team is assigned to a specific segment, depending on the team's number of points. Each of the 5 segments spans one-fifth (20%) of the total points held by the team ranked 1st in the league. For each team, the number of matches played appears in green between brackets, and the number of points is displayed in black.








Sun 4 Oct
POR - BOS
Sun 4 Oct
NJY - LA
Sun 4 Oct
CHI - DEN
Mon 5 Oct
HOU - WAS
Sat 17 Oct
BOS - LOU
Sat 17 Oct
WAS - NJY
Sat 17 Oct
UTA - KCC
Sun 18 Oct
NCC - SD
Sun 18 Oct
DEN - LA
Sun 18 Oct
HOU - ORL




League statistics

212 matches played / 240
88.3% completed
Home wins:  47%
Over 1.5 goals:  77%
Draws:  17%
Over 2.5 goals:  56%
Away wins:  35%
Over 3.5 goals:  28%
Goals:  593 Home goals per match:  1.54
Goals per match:  2.80 Away goals per match:  1.26
    Both teams scored:  53%

Results

 Latest results
 Matches by date
 Matches by Matchweek
 Results grid
 Results filter
 Outcome Surprise-Levels

Tables

 Home / Away tables
 Wide table
 Tables by Date
 Form tables
 Projected points

Analysis

 Goals statistics
 Points performance
 Over / Under
 Scored / Conceded
 Home advantage
 Relative form
 Run-in analysis

Goal times

 When goals were scored
 1st-half / 2nd-half
 First team to score
 Goal types
 Lead durations
 Points Won/Lost
Home team scored first: 48% No goal scored: 4% Away team scored first: 48%
Average minute when home team scored first: 32 min. Average minute when away team scored first: 26 min.
Home team lead-defending rate: 67% Away team lead-defending rate: 59%
Home team equalizing rate: 41% Away team equalizing rate: 33%
Home team lead duration: 28% Teams level in goals: 46% Away team lead duration: 26%
Home PPG when home team scored first: 2.57 Away PPG when away team scored first: 2.20

More statistics tables can be accessed from the 'Statistics' dropdown list on the league navigation menu.
After 212 matches played in the league, a total of 593 goals have been scored (2.80 goals per match on average). The menus above provide access to league-level statistics and results analysis, including the league results and goal scoring stats such as clean sheets, average goals scored and goals conceded.

 

SoccerSTATS.com - Public edition

SoccerSTATS.com provides football statistics, results and blog articles on national and international soccer competitions worldwide. Football fans can keep a tab on stats related to their favourite team or leagues of interest, and access a wide range of team performance data analytics and league standings, not only on the world's most famous professional leagues, but also on amateur and regional leagues over the world. Example of soccer statistics include league standings, form tables, top goal scorers, scoring stats, statistical previews and goal timing statistics.
Follow us on Twitter
F.A.Q. Contact Privacy Policy Do Not Sell My Information
Terms & conditions of use About us Cookie usage and options Membership information
Mobile app
To our loyal users: PLEASE SUPPORT US

Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. Products, services, promotional offers and other offerings from partners and advertisers are subject to terms and conditions. By using this website you certify that you agree with the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy and that you are over the age of 18 or that you have the permission of a parent or guardian to use this website, after your parent or guardian has carefully reviewed and agreed to the terms and conditions of use and the privacy policy. The website's content is provided for informational purposes only is not to be relied upon as a professional opinion whatsover. Nothing on this website should be considered as advice. This website is not associated with nor endorsed by any league or competition (whether professional, collegiate or other types of leagues / competitions), federation, association, club or team. All trademarks, brands, images, logos and names appearing on this website belong to their respective owners.
Useful links (third-party websites):   www.gamcare.org.uk       www.begambleaware.org        gamblingtherapy.org
 
   
Copyright 1998-2026 SoccerSTATS.com
back to top