| Home | Away | Total | |
| Played | 9 | 10 | 19 |
| Points Per Game | 1.11 | 0.30 | 0.68 |
| Select Favourite Stats | |||
| View Favourite Stats for all teams | |||
 |
Chicago Red Stars W |
(this season in the league) |
Chicago RS W's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 15 Mar | Angel City W |
4:0
1-0 Kennedy Linh Fuller (33) --------------------------------------- 2-0 Evelyn Shores (53) 3-0 A. Borges (66) 4-0 M. Niehues (70) |
Chicago RS W | + | - | + | 1-0 |
|
| 22 Mar | Chicago RS W |
2:1
1-0 Tessa Dellarose (42) --------------------------------------- 2-0 J. Huitema (50) 2-1 H. Hopkins (57) |
KC Current W | + | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 26 Mar | Chicago RS W |
0:3
0-1 Barbra Banda (13) 0-2 L. Muoz (22) 0-3 H. Anderson (35) |
Orlando Pride W | + | - | + | 0-3 |
|
| 29 Mar | San Diego W. W |
2:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Lia Eugenia Godfrey (56) 2-0 M. Barcenas (72) |
Chicago RS W | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 4 Apr | Utah Royals W |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Mina Tanaka (74) pen. |
Chicago RS W | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 25 Apr | Chicago RS W |
2:0
1-0 J. Huitema (10) --------------------------------------- 2-0 N. Coelho (51) |
Boston Legacy W | - | + | - | 1-0 |
|
| 30 Apr | Chicago RS W |
0:2
0-1 Jordynn Araya Dudley (1) 0-2 R. Lavelle (10) |
Gotham FC W | - | - | + | 0-2 |
|
| 3 May | Chicago RS W |
0:2
0-1 Olivia Lynn Moultrie (17) --------------------------------------- 0-2 Reilyn Sky Turner (89) |
Portland T. W | - | - | + | 0-1 |
|
| 10 May | KC Current W |
3:0
1-0 Temwa Chawinga (22) --------------------------------------- 2-0 Temwa Chawinga (47) 3-0 Temwa Chawinga (49) |
Chicago RS W | + | - | + | 1-0 |
|
| 16 May | N. Carolina W |
4:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Evelyn Ijeh (47) 2-0 A. Sanchez (61) 3-0 A. Schlegel (65) 4-0 Manaka Matsukubo (86) |
Chicago RS W | + | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 24 May | Bay FC W |
0:1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 M. Swanson (70) |
Chicago RS W | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| 31 May | Chicago RS W |
0:2
0-1 M. Silva (3) --------------------------------------- 0-2 Trinity Paula Byars (90) |
San Diego W. W | - | - | + | 0-1 |
|
| 5 Jul | Chicago RS W |
3:2
1-0 J. Huitema (20) 1-1 C. Lacasse (43) --------------------------------------- 1-2 Cecelia Anne Delzer (54) pen. 2-2 Samantha Keala Staab (59) 3-2 J. Huitema (86) |
Utah Royals W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 11 Jul | Boston Legacy W |
2:0
1-0 A. Santos (22) pen. --------------------------------------- 2-0 N. Prince (58) |
Chicago RS W | - | - | + | 1-0 |
|
| 18 Jul | Chicago RS W |
0:2
--------------------------------------- 0-1 M. Niehues (56) pen. 0-2 S. Jnsdttir (90) |
Angel City W | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 25 Jul | Orlando Pride W |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Julie Kate Doyle (88) |
Chicago RS W | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 1 Aug | R. Louisville W |
2:1
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Mirann Gacioch (55) 2-0 Kayla Fischer (62) 2-1 N. Coelho (80) |
Chicago RS W | + | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 9 Aug | Chicago RS W |
0:0
|
Bay FC W | - | + | + | 0-0 |
|
| 15 Aug | Seattle Reign W |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Madison Mercado (53) |
Chicago RS W | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| Filter Chicago Red Stars W results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 20 Aug | Houston Dash W vs Chicago RS W | 1.50 | 0.30 | |||
| 23 Aug | Chicago RS W vs R. Louisville W | 1.11 | 0.60 | |||
| 30 Aug | Denver Summit W vs Chicago RS W | 1.33 | 0.30 | |||
| 6 Sep | Chicago RS W vs N. Carolina W | 1.11 | 1.89 | |||
| 13 Sep | Portland T. W vs Chicago RS W | 2.33 | 0.30 | |||
| 20 Sep | Chicago RS W vs Washington S. W | 1.11 | 1.91 | |||
| 26 Sep | Gotham FC W vs Chicago RS W | 2.18 | 0.30 | |||
| 4 Oct | Chicago RS W vs Denver Summit W | 1.11 | 1.20 | |||
| 18 Oct | Chicago RS W vs Seattle Reign W | 1.11 | 1.44 | |||
| 24 Oct | Chicago RS W vs Houston Dash W | 1.11 | 0.89 | |||
| 1 Nov | Washington S. W vs Chicago RS W | 1.78 | 0.30 | |||
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.55 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
Run-in overview | ||||||
|
Of their 11 remaining matches in the league, Chicago RS W will be playing more matches at home (6) than away (5).
Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, Chicago RS W's remaining away matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining home matches.
Chicago RS W's opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 1.32 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that Chicago Red Stars W will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 1.82 Points Per Game at home in the league. | ||||||
| View opponents PPG values for all teams | ||||||
| Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
Chicago RS W (19 matches) vs league average
Chicago RS W at home (9 matches) vs league average at home
Chicago RS W away (10 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chicago Red Stars W goals statistics indicate an average of 0.47 goals scored per game so far this season, which is lower than the average number of 1.35 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in the league. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Chicago RS W | |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 4 / 19 | 21% | |
| Opponent scored first | 14 / 19 | 74% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 2 / 19 | 11% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 7 / 19 | 37% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 9.2 min. | 10% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 42.6 min. | 47% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 38.2 min. | 42% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Chicago Red Stars W have been in the lead for an average duration of 9.2 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 38.2 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Chicago RS W | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 19 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 5 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 1 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 80% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 15 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 1 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 7% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 3 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 18 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
Chicago Red Stars W have taken the lead 5 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a lead-defending rate of 80% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 20%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 15 times that Chicago RS W's opponents have taken the lead, Chicago RS W have managed to score an equalizer on 1 instance, translating into an equalizing rate of 7%.
|
Chicago RS W | |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 3 / 9 | 33% | |
| Opponent scored first | 5 / 9 | 56% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 2 / 9 | 22% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 4 / 9 | 44% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 17.2 min. | 19% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 32.2 min. | 36% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 40.6 min. | 45% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Chicago RS W have been in the lead for an average duration of 17.2 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 40.6 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Chicago RS W | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 9 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 4 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 1 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 75% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 6 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 1 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 17% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 2 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 7 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Chicago RS W have taken the lead 4 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 75% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 25%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 6 times that Chicago RS W's opponents have taken the lead when Chicago RS W were playing at home, Chicago RS W have managed to score an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a home equalizing rate of 17%.
|
Chicago RS W | |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 1 / 10 | 10% | |
| Opponent scored first | 9 / 10 | 90% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 0 / 10 | 0% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 3 / 10 | 30% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 2.0 min. | 2% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 52.0 min. | 58% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 36.0 min. | 40% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Chicago RS W have been in the lead for an average duration of 2.0 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 36.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Chicago RS W | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 10 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 1 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 0 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 100% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 9 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 0 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 0% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 1 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 11 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Chicago RS W have taken the lead 1 time and have conceded an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 100% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 0%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 9 times that Chicago RS W's opponents have taken the lead when Chicago RS W were playing away, Chicago RS W have managed to score an equalizer on 0 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 0%.
Results table
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 7 | 2 | 9 |
| GF per match | 0.78 | 0.20 | 0.47 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 14 | 20 | 34 |
| GA per match | 1.56 | 2.00 | 1.79 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.33 | 2.20 | 2.26 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 89% | 100% | 95% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 89% | 60% | 74% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 33% | 40% | 37% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 11% | 20% | 16% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 11% | 0% | 5% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 78% | 30% | 53% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 33% | 0% | 16% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 11% | 0% | 5% |
| Chicago Red Stars W over 2.5 stats indicate a 37% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is lower than the league average value of 54% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in the league. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 22% | 10% | 16% |
| Won-to-nil | 11% | 10% | 11% |
| Failed to score | 67% | 80% | 74% |
| Lost-to-nil | 56% | 80% | 68% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 33% | 20% | 26% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 33% | 0% | 16% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 33% | 20% | 26% |
| Scored in both halves | 33% | 0% | 16% |
| Both teams scored | 22% | 10% | 16% |
| Conceding Rate | 78% | 90% | 84% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 56% | 30% | 42% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 56% | 90% | 74% |
| Conceded in both halves | 33% | 30% | 32% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 33% | 20% | 26% |
| GF over 1.5 | 33% | 0% | 16% |
| GF over 2.5 | 11% | 0% | 5% |
| GF over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 78% | 90% | 84% |
| GA over 1.5 | 67% | 60% | 63% |
| GA over 2.5 | 11% | 30% | 21% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 20% | 11% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Chicago RS W matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 11% | 0% | 5% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 0% | 40% | 21% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 56% | 20% | 37% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 22% | 20% | 21% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 0% | 20% | 11% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 11% | 0% | 5% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 11% | 40% | 26% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 78% | 40% | 58% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 11% | 20% | 16% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Away wins | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Home & Away defeats | 4 | 6 | 2 | 2 |
|
A majority of Chicago RS W's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (3 wins), while 1 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more. A majority of Chicago RS W's defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (10 defeats), while 4 of their defeats had a one-goal margin. |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 77% | 23% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | |
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.11 |
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 0.30 |
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | +0.81 |
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 78% | 22% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 41% | 59% | ||
| League average | 56% | 44% | ||
|
Matches played at home have accounted for 77% of Chicago RS W's total points and 78% of the goals they have scored so far this season in the league. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 2 | 0 | 2 | 11% |
| Drawing at HT | 3 | 7 | 10 | 53% |
| Losing at HT | 4 | 3 | 7 | 37% |
| Total | 9 | 10 | 19 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
Chicago RS W |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 11 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 3 | 33% | |
| GA | 11 | 32% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 6 | 67% | |
| GA | 23 | 68% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 52 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 51 |
|
Chicago RS W |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 3 | 43% | |
| GA | 8 | 57% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 4 | 57% | |
| GA | 6 | 43% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 45 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 41 |
|
Chicago RS W |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 0 | 0% | |
| GA | 3 | 15% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 2 | 100% | |
| GA | 17 | 85% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 75 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 57 |
Chicago RS W scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Chicago RS W score with the most occurences in home matches during the season in the league has been 0-2 so far (4 times).
The Chicago RS W score with the most occurences in away matches during the season in the league has been 1-0 so far (3 times).
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| This season in the league |
|
Chicago RS W have failed to win in their last 6 matches. Chicago RS W failed to keep a clean sheet in 7 of their 9 home matches. Chicago RS W have failed to score in 6 of their 9 home matches. Chicago RS W failed to keep a clean sheet in 9 of their 10 away matches. Chicago RS W have failed to score in 8 of their 10 away matches. 77% of Chicago RS W's points have been earned at home. Chicago RS W have scored 78% of their goals at home. 67% of Chicago RS W's goals have been scored in the second half. 68% of Chicago RS W's conceded goals occurred in the second half. Chicago RS W have conceded the opening goal in 14 of their 19 matches. Chicago RS W have lost 14 of their 19 matches. Chicago RS W have lost 5 of their 9 home matches. Chicago RS W have lost 9 of their 10 away matches. Chicago RS W have lost their last 4 away matches. Chicago RS W have failed to score in their last 2 home matches. View comments for all teams |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsMatch total goals stats
Match total goals statsMatch total goals stats (last 8 matches)
Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)Match total goals stats (at home)
Match total goals stats (at home)Match total goals stats (away)
Match total goals stats (away)Example
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
