| Home | Away | Total | |
| Played | 13 | 13 | 26 |
| Points Per Game | 1.08 | 0.92 | 1.00 |
| Select Favourite Stats | |||
| View Favourite Stats for all teams | |||
 |
Bay FC W |
(this season in the league) |
Bay FC W's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 14 Mar | Bay FC W |
2:1
1-0 A. Pfeiffer (8) 1-1 K. Kssler (20) 2-1 Joelle Anderson (31) |
Denver Summit W | + | - | - | 2-1 |
|
| 22 Mar | Bay FC W |
1:3
0-1 S. Jnsdttir (3) 0-2 G. Thompson (32) --------------------------------------- 0-3 S. Jnsdttir (53) 1-3 Taylor Brooke Huff (56) |
Angel City W | + | - | - | 0-2 |
|
| 28 Mar | N. Carolina W |
1:3
0-1 A. Pfeiffer (20) 0-2 Keira Kathleen Barry (30) 0-3 Dorian Josey Bailey (34) --------------------------------------- 1-3 Manaka Matsukubo (65) |
Bay FC W | + | - | - | 0-3 |
|
| 5 Apr | Bay FC W |
0:2
--------------------------------------- 0-1 B. Courtnall (o.g.) (57) 0-2 Gift Nyakno Monday (86) |
Washington S. W | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 25 Apr | Gotham FC W |
3:0
1-0 Karlie Lema (o.g.) (20) 2-0 R. Lavelle (40) 3-0 E. Rodrguez (45) pen. |
Bay FC W | + | - | + | 3-0 |
|
| 3 May | San Diego W. W |
0:1
0-1 Racheal Kundananji (5) |
Bay FC W | - | + | - | 0-1 |
|
| 10 May | Bay FC W |
0:0
|
Utah Royals W | - | + | + | 0-0 |
|
| 16 May | Bay FC W |
1:1
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Dorian Josey Bailey (51) 1-1 A. Santos (64) pen. |
Boston Legacy W | - | - | - | 0-0 |
|
| 21 May | Portland T. W |
2:0
1-0 Mary Alice Vignola (30) --------------------------------------- 2-0 M. McKenzie (77) |
Bay FC W | - | - | + | 1-0 |
|
| 24 May | Bay FC W |
0:1
--------------------------------------- 0-1 M. Swanson (70) |
Chicago RS W | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 30 May | Orlando Pride W |
3:1
1-0 Barbra Banda (4) 1-1 Caroline Noel Conti (7) --------------------------------------- 2-1 Barbra Banda (51) 3-1 C. Dyke (55) |
Bay FC W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 5 Jul | Boston Legacy W |
2:2
0-1 C. Hutton (5) pen. 0-2 Karlie Lema (17) 1-2 A. Santos (45) --------------------------------------- 2-2 Assata Traor (79) pen. |
Bay FC W | + | - | - | 1-2 |
|
| 11 Jul | R. Louisville W |
0:2
0-1 Kennedy Linh Fuller (21) --------------------------------------- 0-2 Karlie Lema (58) |
Bay FC W | - | + | - | 0-1 |
|
| 18 Jul | Bay FC W |
3:0
1-0 Karlie Lema (15) 2-0 Karlie Lema (17) --------------------------------------- 3-0 Racheal Kundananji (54) |
N. Carolina W | + | + | - | 2-0 |
|
| 25 Jul | Houston Dash W |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 L. Ullmark (90) |
Bay FC W | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 30 Jul | Bay FC W |
0:1
0-1 M. Williams-Purce (2) |
Gotham FC W | - | - | + | 0-1 |
|
| 2 Aug | Bay FC W |
2:3
0-1 Mia Renee Fishel (5) 0-2 M. Dahlien (10) 1-2 Hannah Bebar (13) --------------------------------------- 2-2 Keira Kathleen Barry (75) 2-3 J. Fishlock (85) |
Seattle Reign W | + | - | - | 1-2 |
|
| 9 Aug | Chicago RS W |
0:0
|
Bay FC W | - | + | + | 0-0 |
|
| 15 Aug | Utah Royals W |
3:2
0-1 Karlie Lema (6) 1-1 Miyabi Moriya (7) 2-1 Narumi Miura (22) 2-2 H. Gilchrist (29) --------------------------------------- 3-2 Mina Tanaka (79) pen. |
Bay FC W | + | - | - | 2-2 |
|
| 23 Aug | Bay FC W |
1:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Cristiana Girelli (89) |
Houston Dash W | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| 30 Aug | Washington S. W |
1:0
1-0 P. Metayer (45) |
Bay FC W | - | - | + | 1-0 |
|
| 5 Sep | Bay FC W |
1:2
0-1 I. Rodriguez (11) 1-1 Karlie Lema (45) --------------------------------------- 1-2 R. Cedeo (89) |
KC Current W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| 13 Sep | Seattle Reign W |
2:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 S. Huerta (51) pen. 2-0 B. Ratcliffe (90) |
Bay FC W | - | - | + | 0-0 |
|
| 17 Sep | Denver Summit W |
2:2
1-0 Lindsey Horan (42) --------------------------------------- 2-0 J. Sonis (57) 2-1 C. Hutton (73) 2-2 Taylor Brooke Huff (90) |
Bay FC W | + | - | - | 1-0 |
|
| 20 Sep | Bay FC W |
2:0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 A. Pfeiffer (50) 2-0 Karlie Lema (56) |
R. Louisville W | - | + | - | 0-0 |
|
| 27 Sep | Bay FC W |
1:3
0-1 H. McCutcheon (2) 1-1 Racheal Kundananji (11) --------------------------------------- 1-2 H. McCutcheon (47) 1-3 L. Muoz (90) |
Orlando Pride W | + | - | - | 1-1 |
|
| Filter Bay FC W results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 3 Oct | KC Current W vs Bay FC W | 2.38 | 0.92 | |||
| 18 Oct | Bay FC W vs Portland T. W | 1.08 | 1.31 | |||
| 25 Oct | Angel City W vs Bay FC W | 1.38 | 0.92 | |||
| 1 Nov | Bay FC W vs San Diego W. W | 1.08 | 2.00 | |||
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.77 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
Run-in overview | ||||||
|
Of their 4 remaining matches in the league, Bay FC W will be playing as many matches at home and away (2 in each case).
Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, Bay FC W's remaining away matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining home matches.
Bay FC W's opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 1.66 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that Bay FC W will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 1.88 Points Per Game at home in the league. | ||||||
| View opponents PPG values for all teams | ||||||
| Dates are based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
Bay FC W (26 matches) vs league average
Bay FC W at home (13 matches) vs league average at home
Bay FC W away (13 matches) vs league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bay FC W goals statistics indicate an average of 1.04 goals scored per game so far this season, which is lower than the average number of 1.39 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in the league. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Bay FC W | |
| Leading & trailing (total) | |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 10 / 26 | 38% | |
| Opponent scored first | 14 / 26 | 54% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 6 / 26 | 23% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 7 / 26 | 27% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 19.2 min. | 21% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 43.4 min. | 48% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 27.4 min. | 30% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Bay FC W have been in the lead for an average duration of 19.2 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 27.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Bay FC W | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | |
| Matches played | 26 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 11 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 4 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 64% | |
| EQUALIZING (total) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 20 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 6 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 30% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 10 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 13 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
Bay FC W have taken the lead 11 times and have conceded an equalizer on 4 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 64% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 36%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 20 times that Bay FC W's opponents have taken the lead, Bay FC W have managed to score an equalizer on 6 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 30%.
|
Bay FC W | |
| Leading & trailing (home) | |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 5 / 13 | 38% | |
| Opponent scored first | 7 / 13 | 54% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 2 / 13 | 15% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 3 / 13 | 23% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 15.4 min. | 17% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 44.6 min. | 50% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 30.0 min. | 33% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Bay FC W have been in the lead for an average duration of 15.4 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 30.0 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Bay FC W | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | |
| Matches played | 13 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 6 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 2 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 67% | |
| EQUALIZING (home) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 10 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 3 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 30% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 5 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 5 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Bay FC W have taken the lead 6 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 67% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 33%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 10 times that Bay FC W's opponents have taken the lead when Bay FC W were playing at home, Bay FC W have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 30%.
|
Bay FC W | |
| Leading & trailing (away) | |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | ||
| Team scored first | 5 / 13 | 38% | |
| Opponent scored first | 7 / 13 | 54% | |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | ||
| Team was leading at HT | 4 / 13 | 31% | |
| Opponent was leading at HT | 4 / 13 | 31% | |
| AVERAGE DURATIONS (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 23.0 min. | 26% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 42.2 min. | 47% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 24.8 min. | 28% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Bay FC W have been in the lead for an average duration of 23.0 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 24.8 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Bay FC W | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | |
| Matches played | 13 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | ||
| Goals giving the lead | 5 | |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 2 | |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 60% | |
| EQUALIZING (away) | ||
| goals giving lead to opponent | 10 | |
| Equalizer goals scored | 3 | |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 30% | |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 5 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 8 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the goals giving lead to opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Bay FC W have taken the lead 5 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 60% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 40%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 10 times that Bay FC W's opponents have taken the lead when Bay FC W were playing away, Bay FC W have managed to score an equalizer on 3 occasions, translating into an away equalizing rate of 30%.
Results table
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 14 | 13 | 27 |
| GF per match | 1.08 | 1.00 | 1.04 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 17 | 20 | 37 |
| GA per match | 1.31 | 1.54 | 1.42 |
| GF + GA per match | 2.38 | 2.54 | 2.46 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 92% | 92% | 92% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 69% | 69% | 69% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 46% | 46% | 46% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 23% | 38% | 31% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 54% | 77% | 65% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 46% | 38% | 42% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 15% | 31% | 23% |
| Bay FC W over 2.5 stats indicate a 46% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is lower than the league average value of 56% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in the league. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 31% | 23% | 27% |
| Won-to-nil | 23% | 15% | 19% |
| Failed to score | 31% | 46% | 38% |
| Lost-to-nil | 23% | 38% | 31% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 69% | 54% | 62% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-H. | 38% | 46% | 42% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-H. | 46% | 15% | 31% |
| Scored in both halves | 15% | 8% | 12% |
| Both teams scored | 46% | 38% | 42% |
| Conceding Rate | 69% | 77% | 73% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 46% | 54% | 50% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 54% | 62% | 58% |
| Conceded in both halves | 31% | 38% | 35% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 69% | 54% | 62% |
| GF over 1.5 | 31% | 38% | 35% |
| GF over 2.5 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
| GF over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 69% | 77% | 73% |
| GA over 1.5 | 38% | 54% | 46% |
| GA over 2.5 | 23% | 23% | 23% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Bay FC W matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 23% | 23% | 23% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 23% | 23% | 23% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 23% | 8% | 15% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 15% | 31% | 23% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 8% | 8% | 8% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 31% | 31% | 31% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 46% | 31% | 38% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 23% | 38% | 31% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Away wins | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Home & Away defeats | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
|
A majority of Bay FC W's wins have been obtained with a margin of 2 goals or more (4 wins), while 3 of their wins had a one-goal margin. Bay FC W have conceded as many one-goal margin defeats as defeats with a margin of 2 goals or more (7 defeats for each). |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 54% | 46% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | |
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.08 |
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 0.92 |
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | +0.16 |
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored | 52% | 48% | ||
| % Goals conceded | 46% | 54% | ||
| League average | 55% | 45% | ||
|
Matches played at home have accounted for 54% of Bay FC W's total points and 52% of the goals they have scored so far this season in the league. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 2 | 4 | 6 | 23% |
| Drawing at HT | 8 | 5 | 13 | 50% |
| Losing at HT | 3 | 4 | 7 | 27% |
| Total | 13 | 13 | 26 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
Bay FC W |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 8 | ||
| GA | 8 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 7 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 9 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 17 | 63% | |
| GA | 18 | 49% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 10 | 37% | |
| GA | 19 | 51% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 36 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 46 |
|
Bay FC W |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 7 | 50% | |
| GA | 8 | 47% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 7 | 50% | |
| GA | 9 | 53% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 41 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 43 |
|
Bay FC W |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 5 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 5 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 10 | 77% | |
| GA | 10 | 50% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 3 | 23% | |
| GA | 10 | 50% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored
GA: Goals conceded
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 30 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 50 |
Bay FC W scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| This season in the league |
|
Bay FC W failed to keep a clean sheet in 9 of their 13 home matches. Bay FC W failed to keep a clean sheet in 10 of their 13 away matches. Bay FC W have scored 63% of their goals in the first half. Bay FC W have lost 7 of their 13 home matches. Bay FC W have scored 30% of their goals in the first 15 minutes. 22% of Bay FC W's conceded goals occurred in the first 15 minutes. View comments for all teams |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsMatch total goals stats
Match total goals statsMatch total goals stats (last 8 matches)
Match total goals stats (last 8 matches)Match total goals stats (at home)
Match total goals stats (at home)Match total goals stats (away)
Match total goals stats (away)Example
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
